Download pdf - Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji Narodowa Agencja ... 1.pdf · Program „Erasmus Mundus” Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji Narodowa Agencja Programu „Uczenie się przez całe

Program „Erasmus Mundus”

Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji

Narodowa Agencja Programu „Uczenie się przez całe życie”

Program Erasmus Mundus Akcja 1 programu Erasmus Mundus jako

inicjatywa wspierająca ideę wspólnego

kształcenia – sposób przygotowania i realizacji

wspólnych studiów.

Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji

Narodowa Agencja Programu „Uczenie się przez całe życie”

Beata Skibińska, FRSE

PROGRAM „ERASMUS MUNDUS”

Plan prezentacji

Ogólna charakterystyka wspólnych studiów magisterskich zgodnych z zasadami programu Erasmus Mundus;

Ogólna charakterystyka wspólnych studiów doktoranckich zgodnych z zasadami programu Erasmus Mundus;

Kryteria oceny wspólnych studiów w programie Erasmus Mundus


EMMC charakterystyka ogólna

An EM Masters Course must:

Have a duration of one to two years (60 to 120 ECTS) in PL – 90-120 ECTS

be coordinated by an HEI located in a European country

Be implemented by a consortium of European and, where relevant, third-country HEI; minimum eligible consortium = full partners from 3 different European countries (at least 1 – EU Member State)

provide high-quality education to European and third-country students and reserve a number of places for Erasmus Mundus scholarship holders;


EMMC charakterystyka ogólna

An EM Masters Course must:

be an integrated programme in all its aspects

be based on consortium agreement signed by the governing bodies of the partner HEIs (signed before signature of specific grant agreement)

include a mandatory mobility component

be fully developed at the time of the application and ready to run for 5 consecutive editions as from 2012/13

be fully recognised by first students enrolment


EMJD charakterystyka ogólna

An EM Joint Doctorate programme must:

Be designed as training and research programme lasting for a maximum period of 4 years;

Involve doctoral candidates from Europe and third countries and reserve every year a certain number of places for EM fellowships holders;

Have a joint governance structure with joint admission, selection, supervision, monitoring and assessment procedures,

Have a transparent fee policy


EMJD charakterystyka ogólna

An EM Joint Doctorate programme must:

Include training/research periods in at least 2 of the European countries;

Ensure that candidates spend at least 2/3 of their programme in Europe for the period covered by fellowship;

Offer „employment contract” to EM fellowship holders;

Be based on EMJD agreement

Provide for the use of at least 2 European languages


Finansowanie wspólnych studiów, jeżeli zaakceptowane

do finansowania w programie EM

Zasoby własne uczelni (kadra, infrastruktura)

Kwota ryczałtowa – dofinansowanie kosztów

zarządzania dla całego konsorcjum (EMMC – 30.000 €

na jedną edycję; EMJD – 50.000 € na jedną edycję)

Czesne pobierane od studentów w wysokości nie

przekraczającej dopuszczanej przez KE wysokości

EMMC – 4.000 € (A) lub 2.000 € (B) / semestr

EMJD – 300 € non-laboratory; 600 € laboratory

courses/ month

Dofinansowanie z innych źródeł


Erasmus Mundus selection process

Action 1

EACEA: Exclusion, eligibility and selection criteria

National Structures:

Eligibility EU HEIs

Recognition degrees

EU Delegations:

Eligibility 3C HEIs

External experts: Assessment of proposals

Selection Board

Evaluation Committee

Selection Decision


Kryteria oceny jakości projektów Akcji 1 w

programie Erasmus Mundus Erasmus Mundus Master Courses

(EMMCs)

Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate

Programmes (EMJDs)

Academic quality – course content

(30%)

Academic and research quality (25%)

Course integration (25%) Partnership experience and

composition (25%)

Course management, visibility and

sustainability measures (20%)

European integration and functioning

of the programme (20%)

Students’ services and facilities (15%) Provisions for EMJD candidates and

fellowships holders (15%)

Quality assurance and evaluation

(10%)

Programme management and quality

assurance (15%)


Kryteria decydujące o jakości – AWARD CRITERIA

Europejskie Studia Magisterskie Erasmus Mundus

Erasmus Mundus Master Courses

(EMMC)


A.1 Academic quality – course content

Describe the EMMC objectives (including in socio-economic terms) in relation to the needs analysis in the field(s) concerned.

Justify – using concrete evidence - the EMMC's added value compared with existing masters’ courses in the same field at national, European and international level.

Present the structure and content of the EMMC and justify the added value and relevance of the mandatory mobility component.

Justify the learning outcomes relevance in view of the students' future

academic opportunities (e.g. at doctorate level) and employability.

Justify the relevance of the consortium composition and the expertise of the key academic staff involved to achieve the EMMC objectives.

Explain the EMMC interaction with the professional socio- economic/scientific/cultural sectors concerned.


A.2 Course integration

Justify the extent to which the EMMC is organised in a truly

integrated way.

Justify the extent to which the EMMC is recognised in participating

countries and leads to the award of an official degree by each of

the partner institutions. Describe the type of degree(s) that will be

awarded to successful students.

Describe the consortium joint student application, selection and

admission procedure.

Describe the joint examination methods and mechanisms in place

between the consortium partners to assess the students'

achievements.


A.3 Course management, visibility and sustainability measures

Describe the organisation of the cooperation mechanisms within the consortium.

Explain how the students' participation costs to the EMMC have been calculated and agreed upon by the consortium.

Describe the way the EMMC will be managed from a financial point of view.

Describe how the consortium development and sustainability plan is designed in order to ensure the proper implementation and continuity of the joint programme beyond the period of Community funding and present the Consortium’s proposed actions for complementary funding.

Describe the course promotion measures taken by the consortium to increase the course's (and the EM programme's) visibility and attractiveness.


A.4 Student services and facilities

Describe the nature of the information (/support) provided to

students prior to their enrolment and the way this information will

be delivered.

Describe the content (and, if available, provide a model) of the

Student Agreement defining the rights and obligations of the two

signing parties.

Present the services that will be provided by the partner institutions

to host students / scholars including the nature and coverage of the

mandatory insurance scheme.

Describe the consortium language policy.

Indicate the measures taken to facilitate networking among the

Erasmus Mundus students and between these students and other

students from the partner institutions.


A.5 Quality assurance and evaluation

Describe the internal evaluation strategy and

mechanisms in place.

Describe the external quality assurance

envisaged.


Kryteria decydujące o jakości – AWARD CRITERIA

Europejskie Wspólne Studia Doktoranckie

Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate

(EMJD)


B.1 Academic and Research quality Describe the EMJD objectives (including in scientific and socio-

economic terms) in relation with the needs analysis in the field(s) concerned.

Justify –using concrete evidence - the joint programme's added value and distinctiveness compared with existing programmes at national, European and international level.

Present the education, training and research programme, including its originality, innovative aspects and scientific quality notably as regards research methodologies and approaches.

To what extent does the programme include inter-sectorial and inter-organisational collaboration

Describe the nature and quality of the expected outcomes from the innovative, educational, scientific and technological points of view, including in terms of skills and competences acquired


B.2 Partnership experience and composition

Justify the relevance of the consortium composition and the expertise of the key academic and research staff involved to achieve the EMJD objectives

Describe the complementarity (in terms of education, training, research or dissemination/valorisation activities) of the consortium members and their diversity (in terms of countries / regions, types of organisation, etc.).

Present the partnership track records in terms of networking and cooperation activities (through their joint involvement in EU/international research and/or education projects).

Where applicable, justify the role and appropriateness of the professional/non-academic (/economic/scientific/cultural) sector participation in terms of activities and responsibilities.


B.3 European integration and functioning of

the programme

Describe the extent to which the EMJD programme is organised in a structured and integrated way.

Justify the relevance and appropriate organisation of the mandatory mobility periods of the candidates in the participating institutions.

Describe the common standards and mechanisms developed by the consortium for the application, selection, admission and review of doctoral candidates (European and third-country).

Justify the appropriateness and the quality of joint supervision and monitoring of the candidate activities (including the exams for the taught part and the assessment and defence of the thesis) to ensure the highest quality of the outcomes.

What is the kind and nature of the degree(s) awarded? If applicable, what are the measures taken or envisaged by the consortium to deliver a fully accredited and recognised joint degree?


B.4 Provisions for EMJD candidates and fellowship

holders

Present the information and promotion strategy envisaged by the consortium to reach out potentially interested candidates, in particular those from third countries?

Present the services that will be provided by the partner institutions to host doctoral candidatesDescribe the extent to which the EMJD programme is organised in a structured and integrated way.

Describe the language policy of the consortium.

What administrative arrangements are foreseen for the award of the fellowships (including health care, social security and pension rights) and the distribution of the fellowship holders among the EMJD partners?

Describe the measures taken by the consortium to ensure the candidate’s career prospects and to monitor his/her career development once graduated.

Describe the nature and comprehensiveness of the Doctoral Candidate Agreement.


B.5 Programme managmeent and quality assurance

Describe the quality of the organisational arrangements and cooperation mechanisms within the consortium and the specific role played by each of its members.

Describe the way the EMJD will be managed from a financial point of view and explain how the participations costs in the joint programme have been calculated; if differences exist between third-country and European candidates, what are the reasons for such differences?

Describe how the consortium's development and sustainability plan is designed in order to ensure the proper implementation and continuity of the joint programme beyond Community funding and present the Consortium's proposed actions for complementary funding

Describe the nature of the internal evaluation (by the institutions themselves? through candidates/scholars feed-back systems? etc.) and external quality assessment (by e.g. national, international or professional bodies) envisaged.

PROGRAM „ERASMUS MUNDUS” PROGRAM „ERASMUS MUNDUS”

Przygotowanie wspólnych studiów

Pomysł

Grupa realizująca (konsorcjum)

Szkic programu kształcenia i propozycja jego wykonawców

Sprawdzenie poprawności „pomysłu” z regulacjami uczelnianymi i

krajowymi (JM Rektor, Dziekan, Dział Kształcenia/ Toku Studiów –

sprawdzenie poprawności programu kształcenia oraz sposobu jego

udokumentowania)

Przygotowanie szczegółowego programu kształcenia (na

podstawie ustaleń z konsorcjum) do zatwierdzenia przez

odpowiednie władze uczelni

REALIZACJA (przy stałej współpracy z działami

odpowiedzialnymi za tok studiów i jego udokumentowanie)


Polecane regulacje prawne (1)

Ustawa „Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym” – tekst jednolity po

wejściu w życie wszystkich przepisów ustawy z dnia 18 marca

2011 r. – Dział IV (studia i studenci), rozdział 1 – organizacja

studiów, rozdział 3 – studia doktoranckie.

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z 5 października 2011 r. w sprawie

warunków prowadzenia studiów na określonym kierunku i

poziomie kształcenia

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 1 września 2011 r. w sprawie

kształcenia na studiach doktoranckich w uczelniach i jednostkach

naukowych

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z 14 września 2011 r. w sprawie

dokumentacji przebiegu studiów


Polecane regulacje prawne (2)

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 8 sierpnia 2011 r. w sprawie

obszarów wiedzy, dziedzin nauki i sztuki oraz dyscyplin

naukowych i artystycznych

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 1 września w sprawie tytułów

zawodowych nadawanych absolwentom studiów, warunków

wydawania oraz niezbędnych elementów dyplomów ukończenia

studiów i świadectw ukończenia studiów podyplomowych oraz

wzoru suplementu do dyplomu.

Rozporządzenie MNiSW z dnia 29 września 2011 r. w sprawie

warunków oceny programowej i oceny instytucjonalnej


Polecane publikacje

„Jak przygotować programy kształcenia zgodnie z wymaganiami

krajowych ram kwalifikacji dla szkolnictwa wyższego?” Autor prof.

Andrzej Kraśniewski, wydawca MNiSW

„Tuning Eucational Structures in Europe. A guide top formulating

degree programme profiles including programme competences

and programme learning outcomes”. (Tuning association)

„Salzburg II recommendations. European Universities’

achievements since 2005 in implementing the Salzburg

prionciples”. - Euroean University Association

Handbook of excellent higher-education practice - interactive tool

to assess your own course http://www.emqa.eu

http://www.emqa.eu/

http://www.emqa.eu/


Seminaria „Wspólne studia jako skuteczna forma

umiędzynarodowienia i uatrakcyjnienia kształcenia”.

Przygotowanie i realizacja wspólnych studiów na

przykładzie programu Erasmus Mundus. 8 i 29 lutego

2012 r.

Dalsze pytania, potrzeba konsultacji?

Agencja Wykonawcza w Brukseli:

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus_mundus/index_en.php

Krajowe biuro programu Erasmus Mudnus

http://www.mundus.org.pl

Dziękuję za uwagę

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/erasmus_mundus/index_en.php

http://www.mundus.org.pl/