PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER
Effect of sudden flow reduction on the decompositionof alder leaves (Alnus glutinosa [L.] Gaertn.) in a temperatelowland stream: a mesocosm study
Jeanette Schlief Æ Michael Mutz
Received: 29 April 2008 / Revised: 7 December 2008 / Accepted: 15 December 2008 / Published online: 2 February 2009
� Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
Abstract Climate change leads to summer low flow
conditions and premature litter input in lowland
streams in Central Europe. This may cause a sudden
reduction of flow and fragmentation into isolated pools
of permanently flowing streams, with a simultaneous
increase in the food supply for detrivores during
summer months. We performed a mesocosm study to
investigate shredder and microbial mediated litter
decomposition under these conditions. Leaf litter was
placed in a lowland stream with a natural flow regime
(reference) and in a stream mesocosm with significant
flow reduction (FR) and a representative density of
macroinvertebrates and detritus. Physicochemical
parameters, leaf mass loss, macroinvertebrate abun-
dance and biomass, leaf-associated respiration, fungal
sporulation, and biomass were measured at regular
intervals for 6 weeks. Coarse and fine-mesh bags were
used to include or exclude macroinvertebrate shred-
ders. In the coarse-mesh bags, leaf mass loss was
significantly lower in the FR system than in the
reference regime. In the fine-mesh bags, leaf respira-
tion, fungal sporulation, and biomass but not leaf mass
losses were substantially lower with flow reduction.
Chironomid larvae (Micropsectra spp.) appeared to
effectively fragment leaf litter in fine-mesh bags. In the
FR system, leaf respiration was higher in the coarse-
than in the fine-mesh bags. Our results suggest that, in
temperate lowland streams, premature litter input
during or after a sudden fragmentation into isolated
pools and a reduction of stream flow reduces direct
shredder-mediated litter decomposition, but shredders
may indirectly influence the decomposition process.
Keywords Litter decomposition � Stream flow �Litter input � Shredder � Microbial activity
Introduction
Leaf litter is a major source of energy for food webs in
small forested streams (Wallace et al., 1999; Webster
et al., 1999). Leaf litter decomposition in streams
consists of abiotic processes, such as leaching and
mechanical leaf fragmentation by the physical envi-
ronment, decomposition by bacteria and fungi, and
consumption by invertebrate shredders. Shredders
often stimulate breakdown rates in temperate streams
(Barlocher, 1985; Hieber & Gessner, 2002). Among
the fungi, the aquatic hyphomycetes, which are able to
degrade plant cell polymers (Chamier, 1985), play a
predominant role in litter decomposition (Hieber &
Gessner, 2002; Pascoal & Cassio, 2004). In temperate
climate regions leaf litter decomposition has been
most intensively studied in autumn and winter periods
Handling editor: B. Oertli
J. Schlief (&) � M. Mutz
Department of Freshwater Conservation, Brandenburg
University of Technology, Cottbus, Seestrasse 45,
15526 Bad Saarow, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
DOI 10.1007/s10750-008-9694-4
when the leaves of deciduous trees senesce and fall
(Petersen et al., 1989). In temperate lowland streams
with pluvial hydrological regimes, high autumn to
winter discharge coincides with peak litter input, thus
creating an environment favorable for litter decom-
position (Benfield et al., 2000; Habdija et al., 2003).
Large water volumes and fast turbulent flows dilute
leaf leachates, transport leaves, distribute stream
organisms, and guarantee a high oxygen supply from
the atmosphere. Most organisms involved in litter
decomposition are well adapted to these environmental
conditions (Bunn & Arthington, 2002).
Climate change may affect the stream hydrology as
well as the timing of leaf abscission, thereby influ-
encing litter input into streams. In Central Europe,
scientists predict a regional decrease in precipitation
during summer and early autumn, which could lead to
more frequent dry periods and droughts during this
time (Gerstengarbe et al., 2003). Particularly in first to
third-order streams, flow will presumably diminish
during summer months (Lahmer & Becker, 2000).
These streams may lose their flow continuum and
fragment into a series of isolated pools without
connection via surface flow (Boulton, 2003; Acuna
et al., 2004; Andersen et al., 2006). Since Central
European lowland streams often have a strong link to
the groundwater, and isolated pools may be connected
by hyporheic water exchange, the water within such
pools is not stagnant but has extremely low current
velocities. A reduction of current may be associated
with changes in environmental conditions such as
water temperature, habitat for aquatic fauna and
dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations (Lake, 2003;
Bond et al., 2008). The fragmentation into isolated
pools with changes in the aquatic environment occur
abruptly at the beginning of a fragmentation phase
(Boulton, 2003; Acuna et al., 2005) and may have a
negative impact on stream organisms involved in litter
decomposition.
Furthermore, drought-related stress may result in
premature leaf abscission (Wendler & Millard, 1996;
Kozlowski & Pallardy, 2002). Particularly in small
streams, premature litter input during summer months
would provide an unnaturally high food supply to
aquatic detrivores during a season usually character-
ized by limited supply (Barlocher, 1983; Richardson,
1991). Thus, under the predicted climate change
scenario, premature litter input would coincide with
low to zero flow and stream fragmentation into
isolated pools. The effects of such a sudden flow
reduction within an isolated pool in association with a
high food supply on leaf-associated organisms and on
the dynamics of litter decomposition are unknown.
In the present study, we simulated conditions of
sudden fragmentation into an isolated pool with strong
flow reduction in association with high litter input
during summer months to test their effect on litter
breakdown rates, leaf-associated microbial activity,
and biomass and to elucidate the role of invertebrate
shredders in litter decomposition. We hypothesized
that breakdown rates would be lower in the system
with reduced flow, and that the significance of
shredders in controlling litter decomposition would
decrease in the low-flow environment. To distinguish
the effects of shredders, we compared leaf breakdown
rates and leaf-associated microbial activity of exposed
litter bags with versus without shredder access
(Webster & Benfield, 1986; Benfield, 1996). We also
hypothesized that leaf-associated microbial activity
would be reduced. In particular, we expect lower
colonization by aquatic hyphomycetes under flow
reduction, since their sporulation and dispersal are
known to be stimulated by the current (Smither-
Kopperl et al., 1998; Maamri et al., 2001).
Materials and methods
Study site
The study was performed in Demnitzer Muhlenfließ,
a third-order stream located 60 km southeast of
Berlin in the State of Brandenburg, Germany. It is a
tributary of the Spree River. The stream water is
influenced by nutrients (mainly phosphorus and
nitrogen) originating from agricultural land use of
the headwater catchment (Gelbrecht et al., 1996,
2000; Lengsfeld & Gelbrecht, 2003). Our study site
was located 50 m downstream of a weir. The
streambed was dominated by sandy substrates partly
covered with fine or coarse detritus. In the summer,
coarse detritus mainly consisted of small twigs and a
few green leaves that had been shed during storm
events, etc. Visually degraded leaf litter was scarce
during this season. The riparian zone was dominated
by alder (Alnus glutinosa [L.] Gaertn.) and to a lesser
extent by ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and hornbeam
(Carpinus betulus L.).
206 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
Experimental set-up
We created an experimental design that should
simulate the conditions of drastic flow reduction
accompanied by sudden fragmentation and isolation
of invertebrates in an isolated pool. The experiment
compared leaf decomposition under these conditions
of sudden flow reduction (FR) with reference condi-
tions (Ref). At the reference site the stream was 3 m
wide, 0.35 m deep, and characterized by a natural flow
regime. Directly adjacent to this site, we placed a
mesocosm in the bed close to the stream margin to
induce considerable flow reduction. The mesocosm
consisted of a box (67 9 36 9 30 cm) that was
immersed about 20 cm into the water column to
ensure that the water inside was at stream water
temperature. The mesocosm contained a total water
volume of 50 l and had two opposite openings for
inflow and outflow near the upper margin. The inflow
was connected with a plastic pipe, the upper opening
of which was positioned upstream of a weir to achieve
constant water excess in the container by means of
hydrostatic pressure. The openings of the mesocosm
were covered with a net (0.25 mm mesh size) to
prevent migration or drift of macroinvertebrates and
transport of particles with in- or outflow to simulate
the conditions within isolated pools after sudden
stream fragmentation, where macroinvertebrates are
not able to enter or escape. To assess the reaction of the
present aquatic community involved in the decompo-
sition process under sudden flow reduction the bottom
of the mesocosm was filled with a representative
density of macroinvertebrates and detritus (e.g., twigs
and some visually degraded leaf litter partly covered
and mixed with fine detritus and sand), which were
collected at the reference site with a Surber sampler
(25 9 25 cm, mesh size 0.2 mm).
Alder leaves collected from trees at the stream
margin during senescence (November 2005) were air-
dried at room temperature (21�C) and stored dry until
needed. Since this initial drying of the litter is
considered to affect leaching (Gessner, 1991; Gessner
et al., 1999), the leaves were preleached in distilled
water (24 h, 21�C) before the start of the experiment
in summer 2006. The moistened leaves were then cut
into disks (12 mm diameter) using a cork borer. 25
leaf disks were pinned to a stainless steel wire to
prevent handling loss at retrieval and to guarantee that
disks did not cover each other during exposure or
during respiration measurement. The disks were
placed in nylon mesh bags with either a coarse
(5 mm) or a fine (0.3 mm) mesh size.
In August 2006, 15 coarse and 15 fine-mesh bags
and an additional amount of preleached leaf litter were
placed in the reference and flow reduction system,
respectively. The additional litter (approximately
75 g/m2 stream bottom) was used to simulate a high
food supply. In the reference, it was spread over an
area of 3 m2 and fixed to the stream bottom with the
aid of a net (3 cm mesh size) and tent pegs. The litter
bags were evenly distributed on this litter layer and
fixed by tent pegs. In the FR system, the additional
litter was spread on the bottom and the bags were
evenly distributed on this layer. At week 1, 2, 3, 4, and
6 after exposure, sets of three coarse and three fine-
mesh bags were carefully retrieved with a hand net
(250 lm). An additional benthic organic matter
sample at the reference site was retrieved with the
Surber sampler to monitor macroinvertebrate coloni-
zation outside the exposed leaf litter. All samples
were placed in individual plastic boxes filled with
stream water, and transported to the laboratory.
Physical and chemical stream characteristics
Conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO),
and pH were measured using portable meters
(WTWLF323, WTW Oxi 340-A, WTWpH325) four
to five times per week. In addition, the DO in the litter
bags and the surrounding water was measured on five
occasions by drawing water with a needle-type syringe
connected via rubber tubes with an oxygen microsen-
sor and an oxygen optode (Fibox 3, Precision Sensing
GmbH). Water samples (minimum 1 l) for nitrate,
ammonia, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) testing were also
taken on each sampling date. Samples for nitrate,
ammonium, and SRP analyses were filtered through
cellulose-acetate membrane filters (SARTORIUS,
0.45 lm pore size) and determined by segmented
flow analysis (PERSTORP-Analytical). The total
phosphorus (TP) concentration in unfiltered samples
was determined by flow analysis (FIA). For DOC,
samples were filtered through glass fiber filters
(WHATMAN GF/F, 0.7 lm pore size) and deter-
mined by elemental analysis (DIMATEC, DIMA-
TOC 100). All samples were stored in sealed plastic
jars at -20�C until analysis. Current velocity was
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 207
123
measured three times per week. Current velocity in the
reference system was measured using a small hydro-
metric propeller (1.5 cm diameter, Mini-Air-2,
Schiltknecht), which was positioned 2.5 cm above
the stream bed and 5 cm in front of the litter bags.
Since current velocity inside the mesocosm was too
low to measure with a hydrometric propeller, it was
determined by assessing the discharge through the
mesocosm based on three consecutive measurements
of water volume per unit time at the mesocosm outlet.
Mean current velocity was calculated based on
discharge through the mesocosm and mesocosm cross
section.
Sample processing and macroinvertebrates
At each sampling date, leaf disks were carefully
removed from the bags and gently rinsed with filtered
(10 lm) stream water to remove sand, fine detritus,
and invertebrates. The additional benthic organic
matter samples were processed in the same manner.
The remaining slurry of each sample was sieved over
a 300 lm mesh, and the retained invertebrates were
preserved in 70% ethanol. Macroinvertebrates were
identified to the lowest practical taxonomic level,
counted, and classified as shredders or non-shredders
according to Merritt & Cummins (1996). The biomass
of each group, which was determined by weighing
dried animals (48 h, 60�C), was expressed based on
ash-free dry mass of leaf disks. The number of
invertebrates from the benthic organic matter samples
was expressed per m2 stream bottom.
Microbial parameters
Leaf-associated respiration and fungal sporulation
rates served as measures of microbial activity.
Respiration rates of all samples were measured within
24 h after sampling based on oxygen consumption in
a closed-chamber system with internal water circula-
tion adapted from Pusch & Schwoerbel (1994) and
Schlief (2004). For this purpose, the steel wire with 10
leaf disks was carefully placed in a cylindrical
respiration glass chamber (length 9 cm, diameter
3.2 cm), which was connected via plastic tubes to a
flow-through cell housing oxygen microsensor with
an oxygen optode (Fibox 3, Precision Sensing
GmbH). The system was filled with autoclaved water
from the sampling site and placed in a water bath. The
water bath had a constant temperature (21�C) and was
darkened to prevent photosynthesis. The circulation
inside the system was adjusted to 0.2 cm s-1 with an
electromagnetic pump. Blanks with autoclaved stream
water were measured concurrently for determination
of oxygen diffusion into the system and for correction
of leaf-associated respiration rates. Depending on the
level of activity, it took between 30 and 60 min to
complete the measurements. Respiration rates were
expressed as lg oxygen per unit weight of leaf disks.
To determine leaf-associated sporulation rates, five
leaf disks from each fine-mesh bag were aerated in
150 ml distilled water for 2 days at 15�C, and the
suspension was filtered through 8 lm pore membrane
filters (Millipore). Spores trapped on the filters were
stained with lactophenol cotton blue, counted and
identified under a microscope (200-4009 magnifica-
tions; minimum of 25 fields) and extrapolated to
numbers of spores per unit weight of leaf disks.
Leaf-associated ergosterol content, an indicator of
fungal biomass, was measured on 10 leaf disks from
each fine-mesh bag (Newell, 1993). Ergosterol was
extracted by 30-min reflux in an alcoholic base and
then purified by solid-phase extraction and quantified
by HPLC (Gessner & Schmitt, 1996). Ergosterol
content was expressed per unit weight of leaf disks.
Leaf mass loss
After respiration measurement, the leaf disks were
dried (48 h, 60�C) and ashed (550�C, 4 h) to determine
leaf ash-free dry mass (AFDM) according to standard
protocols (Benfield, 1996). Subsamples of initial leaf
disks were processed in the same way to obtain initial
AFDM. Data were expressed as %AFDM remaining.
Data analyses
An exponential decay model was fitted to the data on
mass loss through time using the SPSS curve estima-
tion method. The equation used for the model is
commonly applied to litter breakdown studies (e.g.,
Petersen & Cummins, 1974; Webster & Benfield,
1986):
Mt ¼ M0 e�kt
where Mt = AFDM remaining at time t, M0 = initial
AFDM, and k is the breakdown rate coefficient.
208 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
Breakdown rates were calculated for coarse and fine-
mesh bags. We did not force the model through 100%
at time zero as an intercept. Breakdown rates were also
calculated on a degree-day basis (k0) by replacing time
(t) with cumulative degree days (�d), which were
computed from mean water temperature (Minshall
et al., 1983; Short et al., 1984). ANCOVA was used to
determine differences between breakdown coeffi-
cients on a degree-day basis to account for possible
temperature differences between the treatments. The
data were ln-transformed before analysis to satisfy
the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of
variance. Physicochemical water parameters, macro-
invertebrate abundance, respiration rates, fungal
sporulation, and fungal biomass were analyzed by
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and compared using a
Wilcoxon test to detect treatment effects. These non-
parametric tests were used because the data did not
have a normal distribution, even after transformation.
Non-transformed data were used to represent the mean
and standard error (SE) of the mean. All statistical
analyses were performed using SPSS (Vol. 14.0/SPSS
Inc., IL, USA) with significance levels set at P \ 0.05.
Results
Physical and chemical stream characteristics
The current velocity was much lower in the flow
reduction system (0.4 cm s-1) than in the reference
(33 cm s-1). Temperature was slightly but not signifi-
cantly higher (P = 0.2, Wilcoxon test) in the mesocosm
than in the reference (Table 1). Conductivity, pH, SRP,
NOx--N, NH4
?-N, and DOC were similar in the two
systems (Table 1). The TP concentrations indicated a
high trophic level of the stream (Dodds et al., 1998) and
were similar in both systems. The DO concentrations in
the two systems differed (P \ 0.05; Wilcoxon test).
Compared to 85% saturation in the reference, the DO
concentration in the low-flow environment was only
65% (Table 1). Both systems exhibited similar DO
concentrations within litter bags of both mesh sizes and
in the surrounding water.
Macroinvertebrates
Densities of shredders (147 ± 33 indiv. m-2) and
non-shredders (122 ± 27 indiv. m-2) associated to
benthic organic matter outside the exposed litter
remained constant throughout the experiment. These
densities had been taken to adjust macroinvertebrate
density at the beginning of litter bag exposure in the
mesocosm. Essentially the same taxa of macroinver-
tebrates were found in litter bags of the reference and
FR systems and associated to benthic organic matter
outside the exposed litter throughout the experiment
(Table 2). Two macroinvertebrate species, Gammarus
pulex L. and Asellus aquaticus L., were classified as
shredders. G. pulex was the dominant shredder
throughout the study period (Table 2). At the refer-
ence site, shredder abundance and biomass in litter
bags peaked at week 3 (Fig. 1) and remained higher
than non-shredder abundance and biomass throughout
the study (P \ 0.05; Wilcoxon-test). Shredder abun-
dance and biomass in litter bags in the FR system had
no distinct peaks throughout the study and decreased
to very low levels at the last two sampling dates
(Fig. 1). Shredder abundance and biomass values in
litter bags in the reference were higher than those in
the FR system (P \ 0.05; Wilcoxon-test), whereas
non-shredder abundance and biomass values did not
differ between the groups’ treatments. At week 3 of
exposure, we detected a high abundance of chirono-
mid larvae (Micropsectra spp.) in the fine-mesh bags
(up to 35 individuals per bag) with no difference
between the groups’ treatments. The Micropsectra
larvae were detected on the leaf surface and inside the
leaf matrix. At the last sampling date, most of the
Micropsectra larvae inside the bags had pupated.
Table 1 Physicochemical characteristics in the reference
(Ref) and under conditions of flow reduction (FR)
Ref FR
Temperature (�C) 13.5 ± 0.2 14.4 ± 0.4
Conductivity (lS cm-1) 969 ± 7.3 970 ± 12.2
pH 7.9 ± 0.1 7.8 ± 0.1
Velocity (cm s-1) 33.0 ± 4.6 0.4 ± 0.1
DO (mg l-1) 7.1 ± 0.5 5.6 ± 0.9
DO (% saturation) 84.9 ± 3.5 65.4 ± 9.2
SRP (lg l-1) 96.4 ± 21.1 93.5 ± 13.5
NOx--N (lg l-1) 40.4 ± 7.1 42.3 ± 6.8
NH4?-N (lg l-1) 107.4 ± 31.4 129.6 ± 78.1
TP (lg l-1) 137.5 ± 26.0 129.8 ± 18.8
DOC (mg l-1) 15.8 ± 2.4 18.2 ± 4.3
Values represent means (n = 15) ± standard error
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 209
123
Microbial parameters
In fine-mesh bags, mean leaf-associated respiration
was higher (P \ 0.05, Wilcoxon test) in the reference
(1.43 ± 0.22 mg O2 g AFDM-1 h-1) than in the FR
system (1.26 ± 0.15 mg O2 g AFDM-1 h-1) (Fig. 2)
throughout the study. In coarse-mesh bags, mean
respiration did not differ between the reference
(1.53 ± 0.27 mg O2 g AFDM-1 h-1) and FR sys-
tems (1.63 ± 0.30 mg O2 g AFDM-1 h-1). Pair-
wise comparisons of the mesh size variants revealed
that, in the FR system, respiration was higher in
coarse-mesh bags (P \ 0.05, Wilcoxon test) than in
fine-mesh bags, whereas, in the reference system,
respiration did not differ between mesh sizes (Fig. 2).
Leaf-associated sporulation rates, number of spor-
ulating taxa and ergosterol content were higher in the
reference than in the FR system (P \ 0.05, Wilcoxon
test). The temporal pattern of sporulation, the number
of taxa, and the ergosterol content also differed
between the groups’ treatments (Figs. 3, 4). In the
reference, sporulation rates and the number of taxa
initially increased, peaked after week 2, and subse-
quently decreased. A total of 10 different taxa could
be identified from spore counts at this site (Table 3).
In the FR system, only five different taxa of aquatic
hyphomycete released a lower number of spores, with
the highest values occurring towards the end of the
study (Fig. 3). The leaf-associated ergosterol content
in the reference peaked after 3 weeks, whereas in the
FR system, ergosterol increased throughout the whole
experimental period (Fig. 4).
Leaf mass loss
During the first 2 weeks of exposure, almost no mass
was lost in bags of both systems (Fig. 5) presumably
Table 2 Mean relative abundance (%) of macroinvertebrates
in coarse-mesh litter bags during 6 weeks of exposure in the
reference (Ref) and flow reduction system (FR)
Taxon Ref FR
Gammarus pulex L. 51.1 ± 22.5 46.3 ± 25.4
Asellus aquaticus L. 21.1 ± 7.4 32.1 ± 19.2
Erpobdella octoculata L. 1.6 ± 0.7 2.6 ± 0.2
Erpobdella testacea Sav. 0.1 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.3
Helobdella stagnalis L. 0.8 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.1
Glossiphonia complanata L. 0.5 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2
Chaetopterix villosa Fabr. 3.4 ± 1.3 1.3 ± 0.5
Platambus maculatus L. 2.5 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.3
Hydropsyche spp. 4.2 ± 2.3 0.4 ± 0.3
Psidium spp. 2.1 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.1
Ptychoptera spp. 1.2 ± 0.2 0
Micropsectra spp. 8.1 ± 6.2 14.1 ± 8.9
Baetis spp. 3.3 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.7
Values presented are means (n = 15) ± standard error
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Exposure time (weeks)
Ab
un
dan
ce(I
nd
ivid
ual
s g-1
AF
DM
)
Shredder Ref Non-shredder RefShredder FR Non-shredder FR
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exposure time (weeks)
Bio
mas
s(g
g-1
AF
DM
)
Shredder Ref Non-shredder RefShredder FR Non-shredder FR
A
B
Fig. 1 (A) Abundance and (B) ash-free dry mass (AFDM) of
shredder and non-shredder taxa on leaf disks in litter bags
exposed in coarse-mesh bags in the reference (Ref) and flow
reduction system (FR). Data presented are means (n = 3) ±
standard error
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Exposure time (weeks)
Res
pir
atio
n r
ate
(mg
O2
h-1
g-1
AF
DM
)
Ref coarse FR coarseRef fine FR fine
Fig. 2 Leaf-associated respiration rates based on ash-free dry
mass (AFDM) of leaf disks in fine and coarse-mesh bags
during 6 weeks of exposure in the reference (Ref) and flow
reduction system (FR). Data presented are means (n = 3) ±
standard error
210 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
due to the use of preleached leaf material. After the
second week, substantial mass loss was measured in
all bags. After 4 weeks of exposure, most leaf disks
in the coarse-mesh bags exhibited extensive skelet-
onization, with only major leaf veins remaining,
whereas those in the fine-mesh bags exhibited partial
skeletonization, with major and small leaf veins
remaining. After 6 weeks, the leaf mass remaining
ranged from 18% of initial mass in coarse-mesh
bags in the reference to 57% of initial mass in the
fine-mesh bags in the FR system (Fig. 5).
The estimated breakdown rates based on time (k)
and degree days (k0) for each treatment group and the
determination coefficient of each regression are
reported in Table 4. Even though some determination
coefficient values (R2) seemed rather low, the regres-
sions were always highly significant (ANOVA
P \ 0.001). Time-based breakdown rates of leaf disks
ranged from k = 0.017 ± 0.004 in fine-mesh bags in
the FR system to k = 0.057 ± 0.007 for coarse-mesh
bags in the reference (Table 4). ANCOVA revealed
significant differences in breakdown rates between the
groups’ treatments. Breakdown rates of leaf disks
enclosed in coarse-mesh bags were higher in the
reference than in the FR system (P \ 0.05,
ANCOVA), whereas those of leaf disks in fine-mesh
bags rates did not differ between systems (Fig. 5). In
the reference system, leaf breakdown rates were
faster in coarse-mesh bags than in fine-mesh bags
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Exposure time (weeks)
Sp
oru
lati
on
rat
e(C
on
idia
µg
-1 A
FD
M d
-1) Ref FR
Ref FR
0
2
4
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exposure time (weeks)
Tax
a(N
o. b
ag-1
)
A
B
Fig. 3 (A) Fungal sporulation rates based on ash-free dry mass
(AFDM) and (B) number of sporulating aquatic hyphomycete
taxa on leaf disks in fine-mesh bags during 6 weeks of
exposure in the reference (Ref) and flow reduction system
(FR). Data presented are means (n = 3) ± standard error
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Exposure time (weeks)
Erg
ost
ero
l (µg
g-1
AF
DM
) Ref FR
Fig. 4 Ergosterol content of leaf disks in fine-mesh bags
during 6 weeks of exposure in the reference (Ref) and flow
reduction system (FR). Data presented are means (n = 3) ±
standard error
Table 3 Aquatic hyphomycetes found (•) on alder leaf disks
decomposing in fine-mesh bags during 6 weeks of exposure in
the reference (Ref) and sudden flow reduction system (FR)
Taxon Ref FR
Anguillospora longissima •Articulospora tetracladia •Clavariopsis aquatica • •Flagellospora curvula •Flagellospora fusarioides • •Lemmoniera aquatica •Mycocentrospora acerina • •Tetrachaetum elegans • •ND1 •ND2 •ND3 •
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exposure time (weeks)
Lea
f m
ass
rem
ain
ing
(%
)
Ref fine FR fine
Ref coarse FR coarse
Fig. 5 Leaf mass remaining in leaf disks in coarse- and fine-
mesh bags during 6 weeks of exposure in the reference (Ref)
and flow reduction system (FR). Data presented are means
(n = 3) ± standard error
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 211
123
(P \ 0.05, ANCOVA), whereas in the FR system, the
rates did not differ between mesh sizes.
Discussion
Our results revealed that sudden fragmentation into
isolated pools associated with severe flow reduction
reduces the importance of shredder-mediated litter
decomposition. Although invertebrate community
composition and densities at the start of the experi-
ment were identical, leaf breakdown rates in coarse
litter bags were lower in the low-flow environment
than in the reference. One possible explanation for this
difference could be that, during a season characterized
by limited litter supply, exposed leaf litter may have
attracted shredders from a wider section of the
reference reach, which in turn accelerated litter
breakdown rates. We observed increasing shredder
abundance and biomass in the reference during the
first 3 weeks of litter exposure, which could reflect an
attraction of shredders to this site. However, rapid
increases in shredder abundances during alder leaf
colonization were measured in several studies, either
during summer or autumn (Maloney & Lamberti,
1995; Haapala et al., 2001; Richardson et al., 2004).
Furthermore, the breakdown rates in our reference
system fall within the range reported for alder in
streams with similar trophic levels (Vought et al.,
1998; Baldy et al., 2007; Bergfur et al., 2007). These
rates were measured during or shortly after peak litter
input when food is not limited and, consequently, the
probability of shredders being attracted by exposed
litter was low. In addition, we measured similar
macroinvertebrate abundances associated to benthic
organic matter outside the exposed litter at the
reference site throughout the whole study period.
Accordingly, we suggest that the increase in shredder
colonization measured in the reference site was not
caused by an unusually high attraction. We conclude
that a reduction in leaf shredding in the mesocosm
accounted for the observed differences in breakdown
rates. It is possible that mesocosm effects, such as a
reduced diversity of habitats, predation refugia and
hyporheic interstitial, lack of groundwater inflow, or
the black color of the container, affected leaf-associ-
ated organisms and in turn breakdown rates. We tried
to partly prevent such effects and to mimic natural
conditions by providing coarse and fine detritus mixed
with sand in similar densities as found at the stream
reference to increase the complexity of the bottom
substrate in the mesocosm. However, the mesocosm
experiment had also several advantages as it allowed a
controlled low water in- and outflow and the simul-
taneous comparison of environmental conditions that
usually occurs subsequently, such as a stream reach
before and after its fragmentation into isolated pools.
Moreover, the mesocosm and the stream reference
received identical environmental influences such as
temperature, dark–light interval, precipitation and
quality of inflowing water.
We assume that shredders in the mesocosm were
negatively affected by unfavorable environmental
conditions that would also occur after a sudden
fragmentation into isolated pools. Severe flow reduc-
tion is known to cause changes in various abiotic and
biotic factors (Benbow et al., 2005; Acuna et al.,
2005). In our experiment, besides current velocity,
DO was the only abiotic factor that decreased in the
mesocosm. DO depletion is deleterious to macroin-
vertebrate species like G. pulex, which have a low
capacity to regulate oxygen consumption at low DO
levels (Meijering, 1991; Toman & Dall, 1998).
Nevertheless, we did not observe severe oxygen
depletion within the metabolically critical range
(O2 \ 2.7 mg l-1) for gammarid shredders (Vobis,
1973; Maltby, 1995). Moreover, A. aquaticus, which
coexisted with G. pulex in our experiment, is able to
shred at low DO levels. Bjelke (2005), for example,
found that even at hypoxic levels of 2 mg l-1, which
is far lower than the DO in the mesocosm, A.
aquaticus has the same leaf-shredding capacity as at
normoxia. We therefore conclude that besides abiotic
factors, biotic factors such as predation pressure also
influenced litter decomposition in the mesocosm.
Table 4 Summary of non-linear regression analyses of leaf
mass loss data for leaf disks in fine- and coarse-mesh bags
during 6 weeks of exposure in the reference (Ref) and sudden
flow reduction system (FR)
Site Mesh
bag
k days-1 ± SE R2 k0 �days-1 ± SE R2
Ref Fine 0.0322 ± 0.0049 0.77 0.0024 ± 0.0003 0.77
Ref Coarse 0.0571 ± 0.0066 0.85 0.0042 ± 0.0005 0.85
FR Fine 0.0168 ± 0.0036 0.63 0.0012 ± 0.0003 0.63
FR Coarse 0.0230 ± 0.0040 0.72 0.0017 ± 0.0003 0.72
Values presented are means (n = 15) ± standard error (SE)
212 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
Accordingly, predation pressure in the mesocosm
could have decimated the shredder population, which
in turn resulted in reduced litter decomposition.
Similar observations were made by McIntosh et al.
(2002), who assume that invertebrate density
decreased in response to changes in competition and
predation in a Hawaiian stream after flow reduction
through water diversion. Indeed, we detected preda-
tory taxa among the non-shredders throughout the
whole experiment. For example Hirudinea such as
Erpobdella octoculata, which can significantly reduce
densities of prey organisms like G. pulex (Dahl &
Greenberg, 1997; Kutschera, 2003), were present in
both the reference and flow reduction systems. In the
FR system, however, extremely low shredder densi-
ties were observed in litter bags in the mesocosm
toward the end of the experiment. The macroinverte-
brates were apparently not able to escape predation
up- or downstream. In addition, reduced flow could
have removed their velocity-mediated predation refu-
gia in case predators and prey normally have different
velocity preferences (Dewson et al., 2007). As climate
change models predict a more frequent occurrence of
flow reduction and fragmentation for Central Euro-
pean lowland streams (Andersen et al., 2006), similar
effects may occur in those streams. In particular, at the
beginning of stream fragmentation, which often leads
to an abrupt cessation of surface flow and a discon-
nection of the formerly connected stream (Acuna
et al., 2005), macroinvertebrates would then be
restricted to isolated pools and, as in our mesocosm,
have low or no possibility to escape predation.
In addition to shredder-mediated decomposition,
sudden flow reduction also affected leaf-associated
microbial activity, which manifested as lower leaf
respiration in the fine litter bags in the mesocosm than
in the reference. This is in agreement with Acuna et al.
(2004), who found that the reduction of flow during
stream fragmentation caused a sharp decrease in
ecosystem respiration. In our experiments, the low-
ered respiration and the delayed sporulation and
number of sporulating taxa in the mesocosm could
indicate that aquatic hyphomycetes have played a
minor role in leaf decomposition. The reduction of
flow might have been too strong to support successful
dispersal and subsequent attachment of hyphomycete
spores or to induce spore production, which is
generally known to be stimulated by water current
(Ibqal & Webster, 1977; Smither-Kopperl et al., 1998;
Maamri et al., 2001). Observations made by Maamri
et al. (2003) support this assumption. The authors
reported that cessation of flow in an arid zone stream
decreased the likelihood of successful colonization of
aquatic hyphomycetes. Furthermore, Dang et al.
(2007) suggest that differences in successful attach-
ment of hyphomycete spores to leaf surfaces might
have implications for structuring aquatic hyphomyc-
ete communities on decomposing litter. Nevertheless,
our leaf respiration and ergosterol content data
indicate the activity and presence of microorganisms
and, in particular, fungi throughout the initial period
of the experiment as well. It is possible that in the
mesocosm reproduction of aquatic hyphomycetes did
not occur simultaneously to periods of biomass
growth or leaf consumption. Another possibility for
the non-correspondence between sporulation of aqua-
tic hyphomycetes and respiration could be that, at
least initially, bacteria or epiphytic terrestrial fungi
account for the measured activity. Thus, aquatic
hyphomycetes might have been initially outcompeted
by other microorganisms, e.g., through antagonistic
effects. Such antagonism has been reported by Mille-
Lindblom et al. (2006), who found depressed growth
of several fungal species in the presence of bacteria.
However, comparing to other studies, even in the
reference the number of leaf-associated aquatic
hyphomycete taxa and their sporulation was low or
intermediate, whereas respiration and ergosterol con-
tents were among the higher end of ranges reported for
alder (Haapala et al., 2001; Baldy et al., 2007;
Yoshimura et al., 2008). We assume this might have
been an effect of the higher trophic status of the stream
or an effect of the season, as our study was performed
during summer with higher water temperatures. Both,
nutrients and temperature, are generally considered to
stimulate leaf breakdown rates, microbial activity, and
biomass (Rowe et al., 1996; Barlocher & Corkum
2003; Gulis & Suberkropp, 2003; Baldy et al., 2007;
Bergfur et al., 2007), but may have variable effects on
aquatic hyphomycete sporulation (Sridhar & Barlocher,
1997; Chauvet & Suberkropp 2001).
Although we measured lowered respiration and
sporulation in the flow reduction system, the break-
down rates in fine-mesh bags were not lower than those
in the reference. This discrepancy can be attributed to
the occurrence of chironomid larvae (Micropsectra
spp.) on leaf skeletons in fine-mesh bags in the second
half of the experiment. Thus, based on the breakdown
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 213
123
rates in our experiments, fine-mesh bags do not prevent
macroinvertebrate effect on leaf decomposition.
Although the fine mesh excluded most macroinverte-
brate adults, it did not exclude macroinvertebrate eggs.
Hence, we assume that the Micropsectra larvae
originated from eggs hatching inside the fine-mesh
bags. We also observed Micropsectra larvae inside the
matrix of alder leaf disks. Our findings indicate that the
leaf cuticle and tissue were sufficiently microbially
degraded in the second half of the experiment and that
Micropsectra larvae were able to enhance further
maceration of the litter. We suggest that, under
environmental conditions unfavorable for common
shredders in previously permanently flowing streams,
macroinvertebrates such as chironomid larvae, which
are not typically classified as shredders, may cause
substantial leaf fragmentation. Similar observations
had been made by other investigators, who reported an
exploitation of leaf litter by chironomid larva (Math-
uriau & Chauvet, 2002) or by tubificid Oligochaeta
(Chauvet et al., 1993) after the plant tissue has been
partly degraded. Stout & Taft (1985) found a chiron-
omid larvae (Brillia flavifrons), previously thought to
specialize on decaying wood, which consumed Alnus
rugosa leaves in two Michigan streams. Callisto et al.
(2007) evaluated the potential use of leaf litter by
chironomid larvae and observed a Micropsectra spe-
cies (M. apposita) feeding on A. glutinosa leaves. To
what extent chironomid larvae participate in leaf
decomposition certainly depends not only on the
synchronization of their life cycles with litter input,
but also on environmental conditions. For example,
high water temperatures during summer months favor
the fast life cycles of chironomids (Nolte & Hoffmann,
1992). Accordingly, we observed that Micropsectra
larvae frequently hatched and pupated within fine-
mesh bags. In coarse-mesh bags, they were found only
occasionally throughout the whole experiment. Inter-
specific effects may have influenced the colonization
of Micropsectra larvae in these bags. It is known that
macroinvertebrates, such as gammarids, additionally
act as efficient predators (Dick, 1992; Krisp & Maier,
2005) and, hence, indirectly control leaf decomposition
through predation and competition.
Another role of larger macroinvertebrates may be to
influence leaf-associated microbial activity. In the
mesocosm with experimental reduction of flow, leaf
respiration in coarse- was higher than in fine-mesh
bags, which suggests that the presence of large
macroinvertebrates enhanced leaf-associated micro-
bial respiration. This stimulation may have resulted
from the bioturbation effect of the locomotion activity
of macroinvertebrates. Previous studies in hyporheic
sediments suggest that bioturbating macroinverte-
brates, such as G. pulex and A. aquaticus, increase
oxygenation and stimulate aerobic microbial processes
(Mermillod-Blondin et al., 2000, 2003). However, we
found no differences in DO in litter bags including or
excluding these macroinvertebrates. The higher micro-
bial activity may also have resulted from an increase in
leaf surface to volume ratio caused by shredding
macroinvertebrates. Furthermore, it is possible that the
leaf feeding behavior of macroinvertebrates, in partic-
ular of Asellus aquaticus, which are known to feed by
scraping the leaf surface (Graca et al., 1993), stimu-
lated microbial activity. Thus, the macroinvertebrates
caused biomass losses to leaf-associated microorgan-
isms and simultaneously stimulated their growth and in
turn their activity (Suberkropp, 1992). However, as we
found differences in microbial activity between mesh
sizes only in the mesocosm, we conclude that in
particular under flow reduction shredders may have the
potential to stimulate microbially mediated leaf
decomposition through indirect effects.
In our experiment, large amounts of leaf litter were
used to guarantee a high food supply for shredders.
However, since preleached leaf material was used for
this purpose, a large amount of readily dissolvable
organic compounds in the leaf material was lost prior
to the experiment. Consequently, we could not study
the effects of high leachate input. Previous studies
have shown that high leachate concentrations may
strongly reduce microbially mediated litter decom-
position (Schlief & Mutz, 2007) and shredding
(Canhoto & Laranjeira, 2007). In addition, a high
leachate input is thought to have the potential to
lower DO through increased oxygen consumption in
the water column (Canhoto & Laranjeira, 2007).
Further studies are needed to determine whether such
leachate effects can interfere with, or accelerate
the effects of sudden flow reduction after stream
fragmentation into isolated pools.
Conclusion
A sudden reduction of flow and connectivity in a
previously permanently flowing stream can reduce
214 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
direct shredder-mediated litter decomposition.
Nevertheless, macroinvertebrates not typically classi-
fied as shredders can participate in litter decomposition
even after a sudden flow reduction. Typical shredders,
in turn, may indirectly influence the decomposition
process by exerting interspecific effects or by stimu-
lating microbial activity. Although we found no
evidence of reduced microbially mediated decompo-
sition in our experimental model, we found that a
sudden reduction of flow lowered leaf respiration and
delayed leaf colonization by aquatic hyphomycetes.
We conclude that premature litter input after or during
a sudden reduction of flow in a normally permanently
flowing lowland stream can affect litter decomposition
and thus the supply of decomposition products for the
stream food web. Our results are essential in small
lowland stream scenarios that evaluate the effects of
drought events or water deficits in temperate climate
regions.
Acknowledgments This study was supported by the DFG
Priority Program 1162 AQUASHIFT. We are grateful to
Thomas Wolburg, Michael Seidel, and Susann Parsche for their
assistance that contributed to the success of this study.
References
Acuna, V., A. Giorgi, I. Munoz, U. Uehlinger & S. Sabater,
2004. Flow extremes and benthic organic matter shape the
metabolism of a headwater Mediterranean stream.
Freshwater Biology 49: 960–971.
Acuna, V., I. Munoz, A. Giorgi, M. Omella, F. Sabater & S.
Sabater, 2005. Drought and postdrought recovery cycles
in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and
functional aspects. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 24: 919–993.
Andersen, H. E., B. Kronvang, S. E. Larsen, C. C. Hoffmann, T. S.
Jensen & E. K. Rasmussen, 2006. Climate-change impacts
on hydrology and nutrients in a Danish lowland river basin.
Science of the Total Environment 365: 223–237.
Baldy, V., V. Gobert, F. Guerold, E. Chauvet, D. Lambrigot &
J.-Y. Charcosset, 2007. Leaf litter breakdown budgets in
streams of various trophic status: effects of dissolved
inorganic nutrients on microorganisms and invertebrates.
Freshwater Biology 52: 1322–1335.
Barlocher, F., 1983. Seasonal variation on the standing crop
and digestibility of CPOM in a Swiss Jura stream. Ecol-
ogy 64: 1266–1272.
Barlocher, F., 1985. The role of fungi in the nutrition of stream
invertebrates. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
91: 83–84.
Barlocher, F. & M. Corkum, 2003. Nutrient enrichment over-
whelms diversity effects in leaf decomposition by stream
fungi. Oikos 101: 247–252.
Benbow, M. E., M. D. McIntosh, A. J. Burky & C. M. Way,
2005. The influence of stream flow reduction on the
energetics of endemic Hawaiian torrenticolous aquatic
insects, Telmatogeton Schiner and Procanace Hendel.
Journal of Insect Conservation 9: 175–185.
Benfield, E. F., 1996. Leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. In
Hauer, F. R. & G. A. Lamberti (eds), Methods in Stream
Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego: 579–589.
Benfield, E. F., J. R. Webster, J. J. Hutchens, J. L. Tank & P. A.
Turner, 2000. Organic matter dynamics along a stream-
order and elevational gradient in a southern Appalachian
stream. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur
Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 27: 1341–1345.
Bergfur, J., K. R. Johnson, L. Sandin, W. Goedkoop &
K. Nygren, 2007. Effects of nutrient enrichment on boreal
streams: invertebrates, fungi and leaf-litter breakdown.
Freshwater Biology 52: 1618–1633.
Bjelke, U., 2005. Processing of leaf matter by lake-dwelling
shredders at low oxygen concentrations. Hydrobiologia
539: 93–98.
Bond, N. R., P. S. Lake & A. H. Arthington, 2008. The impacts
of drought on freshwater ecosystems: an Australian per-
spective. Hydrobiologia 600: 3–16.
Boulton, A. J., 2003. Parallels and contrasts in the effects of
drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages.
Freshwater Biology 48: 1173–1185.
Bunn, S. E. & A. H. Arthington, 2002. Basic principles and
ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for
aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:
492–507. doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0.
Callisto, M., J. F. Goncalves Jr. & M. A. S. Graca, 2007. Leaf
litter as a possible food source for chironomids (Diptera)
in Brazilian and Portuguese headwater streams. Revista
Brasileira de Zoologia 24: 442–448.
Canhoto, C. & C. Laranjeira, 2007. Leachates of Eucalyptusglobulus in intermittent streams affect water parameters
and invertebrates. International Review of Hydrobiology
92: 173–182.
Chamier, A. C., 1985. Cell-wall-degrading enzymes of aquatic
hyphomycetes: a review. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 91: 67–81.
Chauvet, E., N. Giani & M. O. Gessner, 1993. Breakdown and
invertebrate colonization of leaf litter in two contrasting
streams: significance of Oligochaeta in a large river. Cana-
dian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 488–495.
Dahl, J. & L. Greenberg, 1997. Foraging rates of a vertebrate
and an invertebrate predator in stream enclosures. Oikos
78: 459–466.
Dang, C. K., M. O. Gessner & E. Chauvet, 2007. Influence of
conidial traits and leaf structure on attachment success of
aquatic hyphomycetes on leaf litter. Mycologia 99: 24–32.
Dewson, Z., A. B. James & R. G. Death, 2007. A review of the
consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and
macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 26: 401–415.
Dick, J. T. A., 1992. The nature and implications of differential
predation between Gammarus pulex and G. duebeni celti-cus larvae (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of Zoology
227: 171–183.
Dodds, W. K., J. R. Jones & E. B. Welch, 1998. Suggested
classification of stream trophic state: distributions of
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 215
123
temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and
phosphorus. Water Research 32: 1455–1462.
Gelbrecht, J., E. Driescher, H. Lademann, J. Schonfelder &
H. J. Exner, 1996. Diffuse nutrient impact on surface
water bodies and its abatement by restoration measures in
a small catchment area in North-East Germany. Water
Science and Technology 33: 167–174.
Gelbrecht, J., E. Driescher & H. J. Exner, 2000. Long-term
investigations on nutrient input from catchment of the
brook Demnitzer Muhlenfließ and restoration measures to
reduce nonpoint pollution. Berichte des IGB 10: 151–160.
Gerstengarbe, F. W., F. Badeck, F. Hattermann, V. Krysanova,
W. Lahmer, P. Lasch, M. Stock, F. Suckow, F. Wechsung &
P. C. Werner, 2003. Studie zur klimatischen Entwicklung
im Land Brandenburg bis 2055 und deren Auswirkungen
auf den Wasserhaushalt, die Forst- und Landwirtschaft
sowie die Ableitung erster Perspektiven. Potsdam Institute
for Climate Impact Research (PIK). PIK Report 83: 1–96.
Gessner, M. O., 1991. Differences in processing dynamics of
fresh and air-dried leaf litter in a stream ecosystem.
Freshwater Biology 26: 387–398.
Gessner, M. O. & A. L. Schmitt, 1996. Use of solid-phase
extraction to determine ergosterol concentrations in plant
tissues colonized by fungi. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology 62: 415–419.
Gessner, M. O., E. Chauvet & M. Dobson, 1999. A perspective
on leaf litter breakdown in streams. Oikos 85: 377–384.
Graca, M. A. S., L. Maltby & P. Calow, 1993. Importance of
fungi in the diet of Gammarus pulex and Asellus aquati-cus. Oecologia 96: 304–309.
Gulis, V. & K. Suberkropp, 2003. Leaf litter decomposition
and microbial activity in nutrient-enriched and unaltered
reaches of a headwater stream. Freshwater Biology 43:
123–134.
Haapala, A., T. Muotka & A. Markkola, 2001. Breakdown and
macroinvertebrate and fungal colonization of alder, birch,
and willow leaves in a boreal forest stream. Journal of the
North American Benthological Society 20: 395–407.
Habdija, I., I. Radanovic, B. Primic-Habdija, R. Matonickin &
M. Kucinic, 2003. River discharge regime as a factor
affecting the changes in community and functional feed-
ing group composition of macroinvertebrates on a cobble
substrate in the Sava river. Biologia 58: 217–229.
Hieber, M. & M. O. Gessner, 2002. Contribution of stream
detrivores, fungi, and bacteria to leaf breakdown based on
biomass estimates. Ecology 83: 1026–1038.
Ibqal, S. H. & J. R. Webster, 1977. Aquatic hyphomycete spora
of some Dartmoor streams. Transactions of the British
Mycological Society 69: 233–241.
Kozlowski, T. T. & S. G. Pallardy, 2002. Acclimation and
adaptive responses of woody plants to environmental
stresses. The Botanical Review 68: 270–334.
Krisp, H. & G. Maier, 2005. Consumption of macroinverte-
brates by invasive and native gammarids: a comparison.
Journal of Limnology 64: 55–59.
Kutschera, U., 2003. The feeding strategies of the leech
Erpobdella octoculata (L.): a laboratory study. Interna-
tional Review of Hydrobiology 88: 94–101.
Lahmer, W. & A. Becker, 2000. Mogliche Auswirkungen von
Klimaveranderungen am Beispiel einer Untersuchung fur
das Land Brandenburg. In Auswirkungen von Klimaan-
derungen auf die Wasserwirtschaft. KA - Wasserwirtschaft,
Abwasser, Abfall 47: 170–175.
Lake, P. S., 2003. Ecological effects of perturbation by drought
in flowing waters. Freshwater Biology 48: 1365–2427.
Lengsfeld, H. & J. Gelbrecht, 2003. A first evaluation of res-
toration measures to reduce phosphorus losses from the
catchment of the brook Demnitzer Muhlenfließ. Berichte
des IGB 17: 105–114.
Maamri, A., F. Barlocher, E. Pattee & H. Chergui, 2001. Fungal
and bacterial colonisation of Salix pedicellata leaves decay-
ing in permanent and intermittent streams in eastern Morocco.
International Review of Hydrobiology 86: 337–348.
Maamri, A., E. Chauvet, H. Chergui, F. Gourbiere & E. Pattee,
2003. Microbial dynamics on dead leaves in a temporary
Moroccan river. I-Fungi. Archiv fur Hydrobiology 144:
41–59.
Maloney, D. C. & G. A. Lamberti, 1995. Rapid decomposition
of summer-input leaves in a northern Michigan stream.American Midland Naturalist 133: 184–195.
Maltby, L., 1995. Sensitivity of the crustaceans Gammaruspulex (L.) and Asellus aquaticus (L.) to short-term expo-
sure to hypoxia and unionized ammonia: observations and
possible machanisms. Water Research 29: 781–787.
Mathuriau, C. & E. Chauvet, 2002. Breakdown of leaf litter in
a neotropical stream. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 21: 384–396.
McIntosh, M. D., M. E. Benbow & A. J. Burky, 2002. Effects
of stream diversion on riffle macroinvertebrate commu-
nities in a Maui, Hawaii, stream. River Research and
Applications 18: 569–581.
Meijering, M. P. D., 1991. Lack of oxygen and low pH as
limiting factors for Gammarus in Hessian brooks and
rivers. Hydrobiologia 223: 159–161.
Mermillod-Blondin, F., M. Creuze des Chatelliers, M. Gerino &
J. P. Gaudet, 2000. Testing the effect of Limnodrilus sp.
(Oligochaeta, Tubificidae) on organic matter and nutrient
processing in the hyporheic zone: a microcosm method.
Archiv fur Hydrobiology 149: 467–487.
Mermillod-Blondin, F., J. P. Gaudet, M. Gerino, G. Desrosiers
& M. Creuze des Chatelliers, 2003. Influence of macro-
invertebrates on physico-chemical and microbial
processes in hyporheic sediments. Hydrological Processes
17: 779–794.
Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins, 1996. Trophic relations of
macroinvertebrates. In Hauer, F. R. & G. A. Lamberti
(eds), Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, Lon-
don: 453–474.
Mille-Lindblom, C., H. Fischer & L. J. Tranvik, 2006.
Antagonism between bacteria and fungi: substrate com-
petition and a possible tradeoff between fungal growth
and tolerance towards bacteria. Oikos 113: 233–243.
Minshall, G. W., R. C. Petersen, K. W. Cummins & T. L. Bon,
1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem
dynamics. Ecological Monographs 53: 1–25.
Newell, S. Y., 1993. Membrane-containing fungal mass and
fungal specific growth rate in natural samples. In Kemp,
P. F., B. F. Sherr & J. C. Jonathan (eds), Handbook of
Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology. Lewis Publishers,
Boca Raton: 579–586.
216 Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217
123
Nolte, U. & T. Hoffmann, 1992. Fast life in cold water: Diamesa
incalida (Chironomidae). Ecography 15: 25–30.
Pascoal, C. & F. Cassio, 2004. Contribution of fungi and
bacteria to leaf litter decomposition in a polluted river.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70: 5266–5273.
Petersen, R. C. Jr. & K. W. Cummins, 1974. Leaf processing in
a woodland stream. Freshwater Biology 4: 343–368.
Petersen, R. C., K. W. Cummins Jr. & G. M. Ward, 1989.
Microbial and animal processing of detritus in a woodland
stream. Ecological Monographs 59: 21–39.
Pusch, M. & J. Schwoerbel, 1994. Community respiration in
hyporheic sediments of a mountain stream (Steina, Black
Forest). Archiv fur Hydrobiology 130: 35–52.
Richardson, J. S., 1991. Seasonal food limitation of detritivores
in a montane stream: an experimental test. Ecology 72:
873–887.
Richardson, J. S., C. R. Shaughnessy & P. G. Harrison, 2004.
Litter breakdown and invertebrate association with three
types of leaves in a temperate rainforest stream. Archiv
fur Hydrobiology 159: 309–325.
Rowe, J. M., W. B. Perry & S. A. Perry, 1996. Leaf litter pro-
cessing in West Virginia mountain streams: effects of
temperature and stream chemistry. In Hom, J., B. Richard &
K. O’Brian (eds), Proceedings, 1995 meeting of the
Northern Global Change Program: Introduction/Environ-
mental Change. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. Pittsburgh, PA.:
157–160.
Schlief, J., 2004. Leaf associated microbial activities in a
stream affected by acid mine drainage. International
Review of Hydrobiology 89: 467–475. doi:10.1002/iroh.
200410776.
Schlief, J. & M. Mutz, 2007. Response of aquatic leaf associ-
ated communities to elevated leachate DOC: a microcosm
study. International Review of Hydrobiology 92: 146–155.
Short, R. A., S. L. Smith, D. W. Guthrie & J. A. Stanford,
1984. Leaf litter processing rates in four Texas streams.
Journal of Freshwater Ecology 2: 469–473.
Smither-Kopperl, M. L., R. Charudattan & R. D. Berger, 1998.
Dispersal of spores of Fusarium culmorum in aquatic
systems. Phytopathology 88: 382–388.
Sridhar, K. R. & F. Barlocher, 1997. Water chemistry and
sporulation by aquatic hyphomycetes. Mycological
Research 101: 591–596.
Stout, R. J. & W. H. Taft, 1985. Growth patterns of a chironomid
shredder on fresh and senescent tag alder leaves in two
Michigan USA streams. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 3:
147–154.
Suberkropp, K., 1992. Interactions with invertebrates. In
Barlocher, F. (ed.), The Ecology of Aquatic Hyphomy-
cetes. Springer, Berlin: 118–134.
Toman, M. J. & P. C. Dall, 1998. Respiratory levels and
adaptations in four freshwater species of Gammarus(Crustacea: Amphipoda). International Review of Hydro-
biology 83: 251–263.
Vobis, H., 1973. Rheotaktisches Verhalten einiger Gammarus-
Arten bei verschiedenem Sauerstoffgehalt des Wassers.
Helgoland Marine Research 25: 495–508.
Vought, L. B.-M., A. Kullberg & R. C. Petersen, 1998. Effect
of riparian structure, temperature and channel morphom-
etry on detritus processing in channelized and natural
woodland streams in southern Sweden. Aquatic Conser-
vation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 273–285.
Wallace, J. B., S. L. Eggert, J. L. Meyer & J. R. Webster, 1999.
Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosys-
tem. Ecological Monographs 69: 409–442.
Webster, J. R. & E. F. Benfield, 1986. Vascular plant break-
down in freshwater ecosystems. Annual Review of
Ecology and Systematics 17: 567–594.
Webster, J. R., E. F. Benfield, T. P. Ehrman, M. A. Schaeffer, J.
L. Tank, J. J. Hutchens & D. J. D’Angelo, 1999. What
happens to allochthonous material that falls into streams?
A synthesis of new and published information from
Coweeta. Freshwater Biology 41: 687–705.
Wendler, R. & P. Millard, 1996. Impacts of water and nitrogen
supplies on the physiology, leaf demography and nitrogen
dynamics of Betula pendula. Tree Physiology 16: 153–159.
Yoshimura, C., M. O. Gessner & K. Tockner, 2008. Chemical
properties, microbial respiration, and decomposition of
coarse and fine particulate organic matter. Journal of the
North American Benthological Society 27: 664–673.
Hydrobiologia (2009) 624:205–217 217
123