Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
CAPT CAPT Terry BurtTerry Burt850 452850 452-- 7163 7163
[email protected]@navy.mil 29Jun 1129Jun 11
Mission
Develop, deliver, and support aviation training necessary to meet validated Fleet requirements through a continuum of professional and personal growth forrequirements through a continuum of professional and personal growth for
Sailors and Marines
CORE PROGRAMSCORE PROGRAMS‘A’ Schools > 19 Aviation Ratings, 247 Navy NECs / 81 USMC MOS
‘C’ Schools > 31 USN/USMC Type Model Series Aircraft, FRCs & Afloat ‘I’ LevelOfficer Training >14 Designators for Pilots/NFOs, Aviation Maintenance, &
Aviation Ordnance
Strong Strong Enterprise Enterprise
Requirements based on Requirements based on acquisition life cycle planningacquisition life cycle planning
Integrated Integrated USN / USMC USN / USMC staff/studentstaff/student
Aviation Ordnance
AlignmentAlignment Supports career continuumSupports career continuum staff/student staff/student throughputthroughput
Military Instructors return value to NAEMilitary Instructors return value to NAEReinvest expertise in the fleet upon transferReinvest expertise in the fleet upon transfer
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 2
Maintain health of the community and sea shore rotationMaintain health of the community and sea shore rotation
Students in Training Students in Training 65176517•• 22 Learning Sites22 Learning Sites
•• 835 835 Courses (CINS) /Courses (CINS) /1340 1340 locations (CDPS)locations (CDPS)
• Students in Training Students in Training 65176517gg
Initial Skill Training 3954 students
Skill Progression Training 2859 students
Functional Skill Training 485 studentsu ct o a S a g 85 stude ts
Officer Training 673 students
•• Annual Student Enrollment Annual Student Enrollment –– 121,108 (FY10)121,108 (FY10)
53,47053,470 (FY11 TD)(FY11 TD)53,470 53,470 (FY11 TD)(FY11 TD)
•• Instructors Instructors –– 22292229
•• Yellow Gear/TTE: Yellow Gear/TTE: 25,298 items25,298 items
•• Support Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 itemsSupport Equipment 13,222 items
•• Electronic Classrooms: Electronic Classrooms: 420 420
•• Major Trainers: Major Trainers: 871 871
•• Total Training Assets value $1 6 BTotal Training Assets value $1 6 B
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
TRST772R CeTARS4/06/11
Total Training Assets value $1.6 BTotal Training Assets value $1.6 B
Air Board
Naval Aviation Naval Aviation EnterpriseEnterprise
Navy Total Navy Total ForceForce
CNP
Total Force
Air BoardCNP
Total Force CFTNETC
CNATT
RequirementsRequirementsqq
ATBUSMC CNAF
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
USMC
Training Model Managers (F/A-18, P3, H-60, E2/C2, E-6, EA-6B, H-46, JSF, MH-53)
ATS/Training Mgt Teams (V-22,C-130, H-46, H-1, AV-8, H-53, JSF, UAS) 4
Significant configuration changes affecting major TMS through the FYDP
Aircraft transitions require concurrent training pipelines through the FYDP
Priorities aligned to NAE readiness requirements
NAE emphasis on total learning continuum
CNATT Integrated Production Plan will reduce Total Time to Train and close production gap
Aircraft Transition TimelineLEGACY 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 NEW
F-35CF/A-18E/F
EA-6B EA-18G
F/A-18A/D
c a t a s t o e e
E-2C E-2DP-8ABAMS
EP-3A** EPX
P-3C
MH-60SHH-60H*/SH-60F
MH-53E** HLRC-9 C-40A
C-12B/F/M** C-12 Replacement C-20A/D C-37-A/B
MH 60SMH-60R
HH 60H /SH 60FSH-60B
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 5
C-20A/D C-37-A/B
Legacy AircraftTransition PeriodNew Aircraft
* Updated from Current APDF on 5 Oct 2010
NAE NETC/N1New / Increased Requirements
N Pl
CNATTCNATTNavPlan2030MQ-8B
F-35
F/A-18
AAG/ EMALS
PCSIM
TRANETInstructor s
Trainers (TTE)
BRAC USMC
H-1Y/Z KC-130J
Electronic Classrooms
Courseware
NKOMultimedia
BRAC USMCATSP
E-2DH-60S/R
RQ7B
E-2D
P-8ITRO
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 6
MAPEA-18G CH-53K
Aviator
Undergrad Grad
FlightTrng
USNAROTCOCS
Recruit FRS
T & R M t i
FRS
T & R M t i
FRS
T & R M t iT & R Matrix T & R Matrix T & R Matrix
Undergrad Grad
Aviation Technical Rating
ASchool
InitialT/M/SCNATT
Career T/M/SCNATT
Boot CampRecruit
Undergrad Grad
In
Service
SEAMCNATT
In
ServiceIn
ServiceTraining
(QPT)
J
Training
(QPT)
Service
Training
(QPT)
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 7
E1 - E4
Apprentice
E5 - E6
Journeyman Master
E7 – E9
Recruit
16,000
NEC
ABF
Current FIT Fill, Apprentice
Goal IPP Fit FillRating
Annual Plan 15,005
FY10 Production and Goals
91.5% 102.0%
12,000
14,000AG ASABEABH
Rate Phasing Matrix Adjustments
IPP Goal 12,457
93.7% 150.2%99.3% 122.7%86.9% 92.5%89.2% 94.0%
8,000
10,000
ACADAEAM
92.2% 91.1%93.5% 106.3%93.7% 98.4%93.3% 96.6%
4 000
6,000
, AMAMEAOAT-IAT-O
90.4% 89.9%91.6% 95.4%95.3% 104.1%95 3% 104 1%
2,000
4,000 AT-OAW-O/RAW-SAZPR
95.3% 104.1%92.0% 107.0%108.0% 102.0%99.3% 122.7%91.4% 102.7%
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 8
-O N D J F M A M J J A S NETC Production Criteria
> 125% > 90% to 125% Between 75% to 89%
PR 91.4% 102.7%
FY-13 FY-14 FY-15 FY-16 FY-17VFA -301 -301 -280 -280 -280VAQ -33 -27 -23 -23 -23VAW -55 -55 -55 -55 -55F-35C -155 -252 -398 -488 -538Helo/Fire Scout 60 34 -65 -168 -173Helo EXP ROC/POE 0 -421 -428 -696 -688SOF/ISR 0 -400 -400 -400 -400VP 0 15 15 15 15VP 0 -15 -15 -15 -15FRC 0 0 -160 -520 -520BAMS 0 -162 -266 -340 -430UCLAS 0 0 Growth Growth GrowthUCLAS 0 0 Growth Growth GrowthSecurity Billets -10 -20 -20 -20 -20TOTAL -494 -1619 -2110 -3005 -3142
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
Numbers are based on program estimates and do not include CVN or all training tail requirements
Source: CAPT Tom Macrae, CNAF N19
CNAF
Directs / MonitorRequirements
Deliver the right people with the right
Demand Signal
p p gcompetencies to
accomplish the right work for the best
value ... today and in the future
Trains Sailors/Marines
CNATTTraining Model Manager
CNATTU CO/OIC
SignalMarines
WING MOFRC NATEC
HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet Feedback
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 10
C
CNATTU CO/OIC
NATEC
HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet FeedbackWING MO
FRC
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 1111
C
• Local TRIADs
• QPT PQS• QPT PQS
• Bi-annual HPRR Conferences
• ENARG
• Integrated Logistic Support Management Team (ILSMT)(ILSMT)
• Formal Course Reviews
• Occupational Standard Review
• Rating and TMS IPTs
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
• Acquisition FEA w/o standardized process12
• Shrinking budgets
• Pressure to document training impact on• Pressure to document training impact on readiness
• Reduced manning levels• Reduced manning levels
• Roll-down in pay-grade and level of experience
M hilMeanwhile…
• Expanding aircraft system complexity and integration of new platformsintegration of new platforms
• Extending life of sundowner platforms with aging systems
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
systems
. . .more with less13
• Which maintenance degraders are likely suspects for training deficiencies?p g
• What kind of skill and at what level is required to support the required performance?
• At what point(s) in the training continuum is the skill acquired and at what levels?
• Are there any gaps in the training progression? – If so, how are we dealing with them now?
– What would it take, and cost, to fill the gap(s)?
• Who needs to engage, and how?
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 14
CNATTU CO/OIC
• Aligning Training to Readiness
• Identifying Gaps
P idi th ‘ i ht t l ’• Providing the ‘right tools’
• Improve response time
• Focusing ResourcesHPPRs, IPTs, • Focusing ResourcesFleet Feedback
NATEC
WING MOFRC
‘In a repeatable process’
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 15
In a repeatable process
Triad / CNATT Response Engine Triad / CNATT Response Engine CNATTU CO/OIC
HPPRs, IPTs, Fleet
NATEC
HPRR, IPT, Fleet Feedback
WING MOFRC
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 16
NATEC ELAR perspective
• “Unable to effectively utilize schematic drawings to troubleshoot/ repair”
• “Improper repair of electrical connector components”
• “Do not have an adequate knowledge of System Signal Flow“
“Th t h i i i f th f l t i i t th• “The technicians coming from the formal training to the Fleet have no understanding of the system”
• “Most Sailors unable to correlate OTPS instructions,Most Sailors unable to correlate OTPS instructions, pubs, and schematics to effectively troubleshoot basic WRA/CASS station issues”
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
• Visual inspection techniques as aid in troubleshooting is not being reinforced”
17
Aviator/aircrew training only. No accounting for maintainer training
Combined maintenance & aviator/aircrew personnel makes Maintenance tasks p
metric insensitive to gaps in aviators/aircrew
Aircraft systems only. No accounting for
support equipment/IMRL
are implied in aviator/aircrew
tasks
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingSource: Russell Scott, CNAL N81
18
Directly measures contribution of
aviators/aircrew
Specific to aviator/aircrew
training
Add logistics NTAs to explicitly measure
Directly measures contribution of appropriate personnel in maintenance departments Directly measures
Specific to maintainer
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training
explicitly measure logistics readiness
maintenance departments contribution of support equipment/IMRL
training
Source: Russell Scott, CNAL N81 19
Engaged to dateNETC COO NATECCNAF N42COMFRC / AIR 6.0AIR 6 7
NATECCNATTU CO /OiCs NAE TF ESC
AIR 6.7
Next stepsR fi th i l di idRefine the process including rapid responseEvaluate the pilot feedbackSelect candidate issuesVisit the Wings / FRCs Report findings. . .
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 20
Maintaining legacy training while meeting new platform transition requirementsq
Funding requirements transfer from N88 to N1. . .
Fleet Returnees/C School Utilization/NEC Award Fleet Returnees/C School Utilization/NEC Award
“We will develop a comprehensive strategy for the use of high fidelity simulators in training
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 21
We will develop a comprehensive strategy for the use of high fidelity simulators in training. . . provides the right balance of live and simulated training to the Fleet.”
CNO Guidance for 2011
Extending Integrated Production Plan (IPP) to FRC & USMC
USMC Production/Time-to-Train Alignment
Training TRIAD Training TRIAD
HPRR value
Li ki T i i P f t Fl t R di Linking Training Performance to Fleet Readiness
“. . .we have an obligation to set up our Sailors for success by providing them with the tools, training, and the time needed to deploy with confidence in their ability to accomplish
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 22
tools, training, and the time needed to deploy with confidence in their ability to accomplish their assigned missions.”
Admiral J. C. Harvey USN Fleet Forces
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 23
Triad/CNATTTriad/CNATT Response EngineResponse Engine
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 24
Requirements Requirements to Training to Training DeliveryDeliveryLinkageLinkage
Technical Training CurriculumDefense Readiness Reporting S t
gg
EO
Key Learning Points
KSAKSAKSA
JTF NMETL
JMETL
Group NMETL
W f CDR
System
EO
EO
EO
Key Learning Points
KSAKSAKSA
TOMESM
Unit NMETL
CRITICAL &FREQUENT CTTL
Warfare CDRNMETL
APPROVEDNTSP
MASTERTASK LIST
EO
EO
EO
Key Learning Points
KSAKSAKSA
TOFREQUENTTASKS
T/M/S MC and FMCreadiness goals
TRPPM
AnalysisMPT INPUTS TO
CONCEPT
TRAININGSYSTEM ACQ STRATEGYPLAN
NTSP EOKey Learning Points
KSAKSAKSA
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 25
REFINEMENT
RFPTraining System Development
LearningLearning Lessons from NAELessons from NAEAviator trainingAviator training
VADMs Zortman Kilcline Meyers all
CNAF Policy Message 18 Apr 06 Objective:
VADMs Zortman, Kilcline, Meyers all identified training system contribution to Aviator readiness as major analysis requirements
I t O t tAviator Readiness Training • The same process and tool should be applied for
Maintainer training
START
Tool
Inputs• NTAs• T&R Matrix• Skills• Tasks
Outputs• Training
System Specs• Cost-benefit• ROI
Maintainer training
• Problem: What the Fleet needs is not well articulated and aligned for Maintainers
– Alignment of the requirements across Acquisition/Schoolhouse/Fleet is needed to identifyTasks ROI
• Process applied across 10 Navy T/M/S,• Modified process being applied to Marine
Acquisition/Schoolhouse/Fleet is needed to identify performance gaps.
– A modified START process could guide acquisition of training to fill gaps.
– Logistics NTAs could be invoked and reported, ll ti di l t M i t i ith
Systematic Team Assessment of Readiness Training
Center for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical TrainingCenter for Naval Aviation Technical Training 26
p g ppAir.
• $163M awarded across FYDP.
allocating readiness value to Maintainers, as with Aviators.