A Multidimensional Classification of 55 Enterprise Architecture Frameworks
Dr. Eldar Sultanow Dr. Carsten Brockmann Kai Schroeder Sean Cox
2
Agenda
! Problem statement and objectives
! Methodology
! Results of the comparison
! Conclusion
! Contact persons
Problem statement and objectives
3 Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
Many frameworks exist
Readers should be able to compare the frameworks based on a determined set of criteria
Purpose of each framework not well known in the community
4
Agenda
! Problem statement and objectives
! Methodology
! Results of the comparison
! Conclusion
! Contact persons
Methodology
5 Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
Comparison of 55 frameworks in six dimensions
Dimension 2: Architectural domain scope: strategy, business processes, information systems, Infrastructure
Dimension 3: Mutability: once formed, self-preserving
Dimension 4: Alignment: socio-cultural, functionally, structurally, infological, contextually
Dimension 5: Intentional dimension: government and agency frameworks, management frameworks, military frameworks, manufacturing-specific frameworks, technically oriented frameworks, interoperability frameworks, Add-on frameworks
Dimension 1: Covering size of organizations: local business unit, association of local business units, spatially distributed organization, global corporate networks
Dimension 6: Chronological Dimension: The arrangement of these frameworks following one after another in time when they are published or developed, a sequence according to time of occurrence
6
Agenda
! Problem statement and objectives
! Methodology
! Results of the comparison
! Conclusion
! Contact persons
Results of the comparison (1/2)
7 Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
Results of the comparison (2/2)
8 Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
9
Agenda
! Problem statement and objectives
! Methodology
! Results of the comparison
! Conclusion
! Contact persons
Conclusion
10 Copyright © Capgemini 2016. All Rights Reserved
Most frameworks were developed out of the following domains: Government, Business and Military
EAF frameworks are usually forks of existing frameworks
TOGAF is the best established framework. Many frameworks provided the foundation for TOGAF
Few frameworks consider corporate strategy. TOGAF for example allows the use of the Business Motivation Model via the TOGAF Motivation Extension
Very few frameworks can be applied within a SME
11
Agenda
! Problem statement and objectives
! Methodology
! Results of the comparison
! Conclusion
! Contact persons
Contact Persons
12
Dr. Eldar Sultanow
Lead Consultant / Architect Capgemini Nürnberg E-Mail: [email protected]
Dr. Carsten Brockmann
Lead Consultant / Architect Capgemini Berlin E-Mail: [email protected]
Kai Schroeder
Head of Architects Service Industries Capgemini Hamburg E-Mail: [email protected]
Recommended
