1
Interferometric Synthetic-Aperture Radar (InSAR) Basics
2
OutlineSAR limitations
Interferometry
SAR interferometry (InSAR)Single-pass InSAR
Multipass InSAR
InSAR geometry
InSAR processing steps
Phase unwrapping
Phase decorrelationBaseline decorrelation
Temporal decorrelation
Rotational decorrelation
Phase noise
Persistent scatterers
3
SAR limitations
4
SAR limitationsAll signals are mapped onto reference plane
This leads to foreshortening and layover
5
Shadow, layover, and foreshortening distortion
Figure 5-4. Example of radar image layover. Seasat image of the Alaska Range showing the top of a mountain imaged onto the glacier at its foot (center). Shadows are also present on many of the backslopes of these steep mountains. Illumination is from the top [from Ford et al., 1989].
SEASAT Synthetic Aperture RadarLaunched: June 28, 1978Died: October 10, 1978orbit: 800 kmf: 1.3 GHz PTX: 1 kW: 33.8 s B: 19 MHz: 23 3 PRF: 1464 to 1647 Hzant: 10.7 m x 2.2 m x = 18 to 23 m y = 23 m
6
SAR limitations – foreshorteningForeshortening: - < < ( is local slope).
Dilates or compresses the resolution cell (pixel) on the ground with respect to the planar case.
7
SAR limitations – layoverLayover: ( is the local slope)
Causes an inversion of the image geometry. Peaks of hills or mountains with a steep slope commute with their bases in the slant range resulting in severe image distortion.
8
SAR limitations – shadowShadow: - /2 ( is the local slope)
A region without any backscattered signal. This effect can extend over other areas regardless of the slope of those areas.
9
Foreshortening and geocoding
10
Interferometryinterferometry—The use of interference phenomena for purposes of measurement.
In radar, one use of interferometric techniques is to determine the angle of arrival of a wave by comparing the phases of the signals received at separate antennas or at separate points on the same antenna.
11
SAR interferometry – how does it work?
Radar
Return could befrom anywhere on this circle
B
A1
A2
Antenna 1
Antenna 2
Return comes fromintersection
Single antenna SAR Interferometric SAR
12
SAR interferometry – how is it done?
Single pass orSimultaneous baselineTwo radars acquire data from different vantage points at the same time
Repeat pass orRepeat trackTwo radars acquire data from different vantage points at different times
B is the interferometric baseline
13
Single-pass interferometry
Single-pass interferometry. Two antennas offset by known baseline.
14
Interferometric SAR – geometryThe key to InSAR is to collect complex SAR data from slightly offset perspectives, the separation between these two observation points is termed the baseline, B.
This baseline introduces for each point in the scene a slight range difference that results in a phase shift that can be used to determine the scatterer’s elevation.
From trigonometry (law of cosines)
Furthermore for R » B
[Note that B amplifies R]
For scatterers in the reference plane is known ( = o), otherwise is
unknown
Finding R enables determination of and z(x)
sinRB2BRRR 222
sinBR
15
Law of cosines
2cosRB2BRRR
cosab2bac
222
222
sin
2cos
sinBRsinBR2
B
R2
RRsinBR2BRRR2
sinBR2BRRRR2RsinRB2BRRR22
22
2222222
16
Interferometric SAR– radar phase
Radar phases
Since is measured, R can be determined
Example
Let = 10 cm (f = 3 GHz)measure to /100 (3.6º)equivalent to 0.1 mm or 0.3 ps resolution
4
R
R4
jj1 eeE scatterer
RR4jj
2 eeE scatterer
jR
4j
*21
RRR4
j*21
eeEE
eEE
Multipass baselineTransmit and receive on antenna A1
Transmit and receive on antenna A2
17
Interferometric SAR– radar phase
For single-pass InSAR where transmission is on antenna A1 and reception
uses both A1 and A2:
And
Simultaneous baselineTransmit on antenna A1
Receive on both A1 and A2
R4
jj1 eeE scatterer
RR22jj
2 eeE scatterer
jR
2j
*21
RR2R22
j*21
eeEE
eEE
2
R
18
Radar interferometry – geometry
From geometry we know
but is undetermined if the scatterer is not on the reference plane.
To determine we use
where a = 1 for single-pass and a = 2 for multipass
So that
cosRhxz
sinBR
2a
R
sin
B2a
19
Radar interferometry – geometry
From
we find
and
where a = 1 for single-passa = 2 for multipassa = 2 for single-pass, ping-pong mode
Precise estimates of z(x) require accurate knowledge of B, , and as well as R and h
B2asincosRhxz 1
B2asin 1
sin
B2a
20
Interferometric SAR processing geometry
Range S phere
Doppler Cone
VelocityVector
Phase Cone
AircraftPosition
BaselineVector
S catterer is at intersection of RangeS phere, Doppler Cone and Phase
Cone
21
SAR InterferometryInSAR provides additional information via phase measurements
This additional information enables a variety of new capabilities
Topography measurement
Vertical surface displacement (uplift or subsidence)
Lateral surface displacement (velocity)
Change detection (via phase decorrelation)
22
SAR InterferometryMulti-pass interferometry
Two pass• Two scenes, one interferogram
topography, change detection surface velocity (along-track interferometry – temporal baseline)
Three pass• Three scenes, two interferograms
topography, change detection, surface deformation
23
Differential interferometry – how does it work?
Three-pass repeat track
Two different baselines
Same incidence angle
Same absolute range
Parallel ray approximation used to detect changes
If the surface did not change between observations, then
),B(),B( 2211
0)sin(B
)sin(B
11
2212
24
Interferometric SAR processingProduction of interferometric SAR images and data sets involves multiple processes.
Independent SAR data sets must be collected
Complex SAR images are produced
SAR images must be registered with one another
Interferometric phase information extracted pixel-by-pixel
Coherence is analyzed
Phase is unwrapped (removes modulo-2 ambiguity)
Phase is interpolated
Phase is converted into height
Interferometric image is geocoded
To produce surface velocity or displacement maps, successive pairs of InSAR images are processed to separate elevation effects from displacements.
25
InSAR processing steps
26
Phase history and magnitude image
27
Phase image
28
Illustrated InSAR processes (1 of 3)
29
Illustrated InSAR processes (2 of 3)
30
Illustrated InSAR processes (3 of 3)
31
Phase coherenceLack of coherence caused by decorrelation
Baseline decorrelationSufficient change in incidence angle results in scatterer interference (fading effect)
Temporal decorrelationMotion of scatterers between observations produces random phase
– Windblown vegetation– Continual change of water surface– Precipitation effects– Atmospheric or ionospheric variations– Manmade effects
Rotational decorrelationData collected from nonparallel paths
Phase unwrapping to obtain absolute phase requires reference point
32
SAR InterferometryThe radar does not measure the path length directly, rather it measures the interferometric phase difference, , that is related to the path length difference, R
The measured phase will vary across the radar swath width even for a surface without relief (i.e., a flat surface or smooth Earth)
increases as the sine of
If o is the incidence angle in the absence
of relief and z is the elevation of a pixel at the same Ro, then the change in incidence
angle induced by the relief is
sinB2a
R2a
oo sinR
z
33
SAR InterferometryIt follows that
phase due to phase due tosmooth Earth relief
Removing the phase component due to the smooth Earth yields a “flattened interferogram”
ooo cosB
2asinB
2asinB
2a
oo
oflat sinR
zcosB
2a
34
SAR Interferometry
35
Ambiguity heightThe interferometric ambiguity height, e, which is the elevation for which the flattened interferogram changes by one cycle, is
The ambiguity height is like the sensitivity of the InSAR to relief.
From this relationship we know
• A large baseline B improves the InSAR’s sensitivity to height variations.
• However since the radar measures interferometric phase in a modulo 2 manner, to obtain a continuous relief profile over the whole scene the interferometric phase must be unwrapped.
• To unambiguously unwrap the phase, the interferometric phase must be adequately sampled.
• This sampling occurs at each pixel, thus if the interferometric phase changes by 2 or more across one pixel a random phase pattern results making unwrapping difficult if not impossible.
• The problem is aggravated for positive terrain slopes (sloping toward radar)
o
oo
cosBa
sinRe
36
Phase unwrapping
z
x
ACTUAL ELEVATION PROFILE
x
Phase
0
2
WRAPPED PHASE
x
Phase
0
2
4
6
8
UNWRAPPED PHASE
Formerly phase unwrapping was an active research area, now Matlab has a built-in function (unwrap.m) that does this reliably for most cases.
37
Baseline decorrelationTo illustrate this consider two adjacent pixels in the range dimension – pixel 1 & pixel 2 – on a surface with slope .
The interferometric phase for these two pixels is
For small r (small slant range pixel spacing)
and from geometry we know
so that
sinB2a
sinB2a
2
1
cosB
2acosB
2asinB
2a12
tanR o
r
tanRcosB
2a
o
r12
38
Baseline decorrelationLimiting to 2 results in a critical baseline, Bc such that if
B > Bc the interferometric phases will be hopelessly
unwrappable.
This phenomenon is know as baseline decorrelation.
B denotes the perpendicular component of baseline B
where a = 1 for single-passa = 2 for multipassa = 2 for ping-pong mode
[i.e., Tx(A1)–Rx(A1 , A2); Tx(A2)–Rx(A1, A2); repeat]
r
occ a
tanRcosBB
39
Perpendicular BaselinePerpendicular Baseline, B
Parallel-ray assumptionOrthogonal baseline component, B, is key parameter used in InSAR analysisB = B cos( - )
40
Baseline decorrelationWhile Bc represents the theoretical maximum baseline that
will avoid decorrelation, experiments show that a more conservative baseline should be used.
41
CorrelationThe degree of coherence between the two complex SAR images, s1 and s2, is defined as the cross-correlation
coefficient, , or simply the correlation
where
s2* is the complex conjugate of s2
E{ } is ensemble averaging
(incoherent) 0 < < 1 (coherent)
is a quality indicator of the interferometric phase,for precise information extraction, a high value is required.
}s{E}s{E
}ss{E2
22
1
*21
42
Decorrelation effectsFactors contributing to decorrelation include:
Spatial baseline• Inadequate spatial phase sampling (a.k.a. baseline decorrelation)
• Fading effects
Rotation• Non-parallel data-collection trajectories
• Fading effects
Temporal baseline• Physical change in propagation path and/or scatterer between observations
Noise• Thermal noise
• Quantization effects
Processing imperfections• Misregistration
• Uncompensated range migration
• Phase artifacts
43
Noise effectsRandom noise (thermal, external, or otherwise) contributes to interferometric phase decorrelation.
Analysis goes as follows:
Consider two complex SAR signals, s1 and s2, each of
which is modeled as
where c is a correlated part common to the signal from both
antennas and the thermal noise components are n1 and n2.
The correlation coefficient due to noise, N, of s1 and s2 is
2211 ncsandncs
}ss{E}ss{E
}ss{E*22
*11
*21
N
44
Noise effectsSince the noise and signal components are uncorrelated, we get
Recall that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is |c|2/|n|2 yields
For an SNR of , the expected correlation due to noise is 1
For an SNR of 10 (10 dB), N = 0.91
For an SNR of 4.5 (6.5 dB), the N = 0.81
22
2
Nnc
c
122N SNR1
1
cn1
1
45
Noise effectsNoise also increases the uncertainty in the phase measurement, i.e., the standard deviation of the phase,
SNR
1
signal
n
46
Noise effects
Note that the slope as
1
A 6.5 dB SNR yields a 50 standard deviation and a correlation of about 0.8
47
Noise with another decorrelation factor
Now consider two complex SAR signals, s1 and s2, each of
which is modeled as
where c is a correlated part common to the signal from both
antennas, di is the uncorrelated part due to spatial baseline
decorrelation (exclusive of noise), and the thermal noise
component is ni.
The correlation of s1 and s2 for an infinite SNR is
222111 ndcsandndcs
22
2
spatialdc
c
48
Noise with another decorrelation factorNow re-introducing noise we get
and since SNR is (|c|2 + |d|2 )/|n|2
222
2
noisespatialndc
c
222
22
22
2
noisespatialndc
dc
dc
c
122
2
noisespatial SNR1
1
dc
c
Nspatialnoisespatial
49
Decorrelation and phaseThe decorrelation effects from the various causes compound, i.e.,
where
scene denotes long-term scene coherence
N represents decorrelation due to noise
H includes system decorrelation sources
including baseline decorrelation, misregistration, etc.
The probability density function (pdf) reveals some statistical characteristics of the interferometric phase.
For strong correlations ( 1) the phase difference is very small and only a few outliers exist.
HNscene
Bamler, R. and D. Just, “Phase statistics and decorrelation in SAR interferograms,” IGARSS ’93, Toyko, pp. 980-984, 1993.
50
Spatial baseline decorrelation
51
Rotational decorrelation
Complete decorrelation results after rotation of 2.8 at L-band and 0.7
at C-band.
52
Temporal decorrelation
~ 0.5 yields reasonably reliable topographic maps
Complete decorrelation results after rms motion of ~ /3
53
Fading effects
Increasing the number of looks reduces the phase standard deviation, especially for N > 8
54
Uncompensated range migration effects
55
Misregistration effects
Residual misregistration of 1/8 resolution cell leads to a 42-standard deviation for a 10-dB SNR and a 23-standard deviation
for an SNR of .
56
MisregistrationMisregistration leads to increased phase variance, not a phase offset (bias).
SAR imaging geometry variations contribute to misregistration.
Removing geometric distortion and shifts is called coregistration or registration.
A two-part process for achieving acceptable registration involves a coarse or rough registration followed by a fine or precise registration process.
The goal is to register the two complex SAR images to within 1/8 of a pixel.
57
Rough registrationIn the rough registration process reference points (pass points) are identified in both images.
Transformations are determined that will align the pass points in both images.
The transformation and resampling is applied to one of the images so that the two images are registered at the pixel level.
58
Rough registrationSpline interpolation is used to resample the image to provide the pixel-level registration.
59
Precise registrationFollowing rough registration, a precise registration process is used to achieve the desired 1/8 pixel registration.
Again reference (pass) points are selected.
60
Precise registrationAn image segment from the master image is selected and in the same location in the slave image a slightly smaller image segment is selected.
These image segments undergo 8:1 interpolation (to achieve a 1/8 pixel registration).
A search for the proper two-dimensional shift is conducted using the correlation coefficient as the measure of goodness.
Results from this search process are applied to the overall image.
61
Precise registration
62
Geometric correction
2
02 zHr_slr_gr
63
Geometric correction
The steep slope, as seen in the slant range axis, appears to have a negative slope. This phenomenon is used as a layover indicator.
The areas affected by layover are identified and undergo additional processing to remove the associated geometric distortion.
64
Geometric correctionThe pixels affected by layover can then be resorted to correct for the geometric distortion resulting from the layover effect.
Uncorrected residual height (elevation) errors will prevent complete removal of layover effects.
65
Geometric correction
In regions of shadow, the low SNR results in large phase errors and, consequently, large height errors.
Height errors must be detected and corrected to produce valuable elevation maps.
66
Geometric correction
67
Geometric correction
68
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterersMaterial taken from Ferretti, Prati, and Rocca, “Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(1), pp. 8-20, 2001.
Multipass SAR interferometry involves phase comparison of SAR images gathered at different times with slightly different look angles.
Multipass InSAR enables production of digital elevation maps (DEMs) with meter accuracy as well as terrain deformations with millimetric accuracy.
Factors limiting the usefulness of multipass InSAR include:temporal decorrelation
geometric decorrelation
atmospheric inhomogeneities
Without these difficulties, very long term temporal baseline interferometric analyses would be possible revealing subtle trends.
69
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
Temporal decorrelationScenes containing elements whose electromagnetic response (scattering) changes over time render multipass InSAR infeasible. Vegetated areas are prime examples.
Geometric decorrelationScenes containing scatterers whose scattering varies with incidence angle limits the number of image pairs suitable for interferometric applications.
Atmospheric inhomogeneityAtmospheric heterogeneity superimposes on each complex SAR image an atmospheric phase screen (APS) that compromises interferometric precision.
70
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterersConventional InSAR processing relies on the correlation coefficient as a quality indicator of the interferometric phase.
These decorrelation factors all degrade the overall scene correlation.
However, studies have found that scenes frequently contain permanent or persistent scatterers (PS) that maintain phase coherence over long time intervals.
Often times the dimensions of the PS are smaller than the SAR’s spatial resolution. This feature enables the use of spatial baseline lengths greater than the critcal baseline.
Pixels containing PSs submeter DEM accuracy and millimetric terrain motion (in the line of sight direction) can be detected.
71
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
The availability of multiple persistent scatterers widely distributed over the scene enables estimation of the atmospheric phase screen (APS)
With an estimate of the APS, these effects can be removed enabling production of reliable elevation and velocity measurements.
A network of persistent scatterers in a scene has been likened to a “natural” GPS network useful for monitoring sliding areas, urban subsidence, seismic faults, and volcanoes.
72
Persistent scattererWhat makes a good persistent scatterer ?
Scatterers with a large RCS and a large scattering beamwidth.
For example, naturally occuring dihedrals and trihedrals.
These can often be found in urban areas and rocky terrrain.
73
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
Taken from Warren, Sowter, and Bigley, “A DEM-free approach to persistent point scatterer interferometry,” FIG Symposium, 2006.
74
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
Atmospheric phase screen estimated from analysis of two complex Atmospheric phase screen estimated from analysis of two complex SAR images separated over a 425 day period.SAR images separated over a 425 day period.
75
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
76
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
77
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
78
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers
79
Temporal decorrelation and persistent scatterers