1
Governance Learning Program Review:A Participatory Action-Oriented Approach
WBI, October 25th, 2001
‘Through rigorous and participatory
action-oriented learning programs, to support stakeholders in concretely
improving governance capacity in their country, thus reducing poverty ’
Simple formula on the process: IG = KD + CB + CA + PW
(I mproving G overnance = K nowledge D eepening + C apacity B uilding
+ C ollective A ction + P olitical W ill)
For general information on the governance program, please visit http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance
For specifics on the governance program review: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/proglog.htm
2
Presentation’s Outline and Key Issues
• Define, Unbundle & Operationalize Governance
• Challenge of Action-Oriented Country-Focus: The Key elements of the revamped Governance Program
• Program Components: Integration, and key Inputs to other programs (and to Mainstreaming of Governance)
• Partnerships within/outside the Bank as key vehicle
• “Learning Program Cycle” at Country level (and country strategy note) as key tools for action-learning
• Strategy for relevant Monitoring and Evaluation
• Some Unresolved Issues and Challenges
3
Defining and Operationalizing Governance
• Governance is the process and institutions by which authority in a country is exercised:
(1) the process by which governments are selected, held accountable, monitored, and replaced;
(2) the capacity of governments to manage resources efficiently, and to formulate, implement, and enforce sound policies and regulations; and,
(3) the respect for the institutions that govern economic and social interactions among them
Each of these 3 components in Governance definition is unbundled into 2 measurable subcomponents (total of 6): Database and details: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/data_main.htm
4
Question: W hich is the MOST important obstacle to the transparency and impartiality of the judiciary?
Source: Comprehensive Legal and Judicial Development Conference, June 6, 2000. Instant Survey Results, Sample Size 130.
18%
8%
18%
1%
30%
26%
6%
38%
13%
44%
0%
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Absence of jobsecurity
Inadequate training
Inadequateremuneration
Absence of merit-based selection
process for judges
Political interference /Lack of independence
Powerful economicinterests / Elite
influence
Eastern Europe andFormer Soviet Union
DevelopingCountries
Percentage of responses
The Challenge of Country/Regional Adaptation:Survey Responses to: Largest Obstacle to Impartial and
Transparent JudiciaryTransition Economies vs. Developing Countries
5
Enormous Variation in State Capture across countries (selected countries
in transition)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
% of firms
directly
affected by
capture
Hungary Estonia Russia Ukraine
Parliament Votes Pres. Decrees Courts“Purchase” of:
Source: WBI/ECA/EBRD research on State Capture. See F&D synthesis at http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/seizestate.htm
6
Governance Learning Program – The Evolution and Restructuring
The Past…
1. One-off/Stand alone activities2. Generic course participants3. WBI on its own4. Awareness-raising5. Face-to-face only6. High-cost deliveries7. Focus on bribery/corruption
8. National vs. subnational9. Client vs. staff learning10. Traditional classroom11. Softer content/qualitative
12. Anti-corruption “silo”
13. Basic evaluation14. Stand-alone within WBI
…to Present and into the Future
Strategic program cycle approachCountry focus/selectivity (“G-5”)Partners as preconditionConcrete impact on the groundWith IT and DL tools (VC/web)Unit cost efficiency On Governance; Effective Use of Public Resources and
of Policy-Making; state captureNational and subnational and urban governanceClient with staff learningAction-learning approachR&D/Empirics/quantitative indicators/diagnostics
Good Governance for Anti-Poverty and Input to Sectoral Reform
Rigorous impact evaluationIntegrated: Input to other WBI programs and to
regions
7
Parliaments Misgoverned or Honest Institutions?
35/35
30/3042/4215/2235/36
17/2034/42
32/4312/22
27/36
8/32
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Cambodia Latvia Georgia Honduras Argentina Romania Paraguay Slovakia Peru Columbia Ecuador
Rank of Parliament within country, by households
% w
ho
bel
ieve
th
at P
arli
amen
t is
cor
rup
t
Good Bad
Source: WBI diagnostics and survey data; various countries; 1992-2001Note: The chart shows percentage of respondents reporting that Parliament is dishonest institution. The number at the top of each bar reflects the ranking of Parliament relative to other,pre-defined government institutions.
9
Another Illustration: Governance in the Effective Use of Public
Resources ProgramFrom• Traditional PEM -
budget design, rules, professionalization of bureaucracy
• Traditional classroom course, 2-weeks, WBI stand-alone, F2F
To• Focus on how public
resources are governed and used, e.g. governance in budget execution & procurement
• Training activities integrated into overall Bank operations, using DL, F2F, web-based
• Also, New Programs: judiciary reform; governance and the poor; anti-corruption and the youth; confronting state capture; new empirical tools, etc. (for catalog of learning activities, visit http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/proglog.htm#catalog )
10
Governance Program Components
• National and Sub-National Governance• Effective Use of Public Resources• Legal and Judicial Learning Program• Media Development and Accountability• Parliamentary Strengthening• Private - Public Sector Governance Nexus• Governance R&D as Key Input to all
Operational Learning Components above
11
Effective Use of Public
ResourcesPREM · OCPS
AFR · ECA
Legal and Judicial Learning Program
PREM · LAC · AFR · ECA
LEG
Media Development & Accountability
PREM · LAC EXT · AFR
Private – Public Sector Governance
PSI · EAP · ECA · INTBE · PREM · ISG
HRS · LEG
Parliamentary Strengthening
OCPS · EXT AFR · PREM
National and Subnational GovernancePREM · LAC
AFR · INT
Governance
Governance R&D as key input to all operational
learning components
DEC · ECA · LAC AFR · ASIA
PREM
Governance Programs& WBG Partners
12
Attacking Poverty
CESI
Fiscal Decentralization
Market Solutions
Knowledge for Development
Education
Health
Social Protection
HIV/AIDS
Staff Learning
with PREM
Sustainable Development
Governance in Budget
Covering Budgets and Government
Spending
Diagnostics, Empirics,
R&D
Transparency in
Infrastructure
Participation in Municipal Governance
Participation in National
Governance
Corporate Responsibility
Investigative Journalism
Parliaments, Governance
PRSP
Governing Municipalities
Governance and Anti-
Corruption for Youth
Governance
Governance Modules: Input to Learning Programs
13
Improving Judiciary
with LEG/PREM
Municipal Governance for LAC and Africa
with EP/Decentralization
PROCUREMENTWorkshopsWith OCPS
GOVERNANCE
SHAPING AND IMPLEMENTATION
OF RULES
NATIONAL AND SUBNATIONAL
EFFECTIVE USE OF PUBLIC
RESOURCES
Illustrations of Joint Programs
StaffLearningAnd WBGSeminar Series
(w/ PREM & ECA)
Statistical/Data Gathering&Analysis Capacity-BuildingInitiative w/DEC
Anti-corruptionFor the youthw/EXT-AFR
14
Examples of Mainstreaming Governance: Collaboration in
Staff Training & RelatedEmpirical Analysis & Design of Governance Reforms:
– New Tools and Methodologies for Governance Analysis (with ECA, DEC, PREM)
– Governance and the Shaping of the Investment Climate (incl. State Capture): Using Empirical Tools in the Design of Reform Strategies (with ECA, PREM, PSI, DEC)
– Governance and Poverty: Use of Empirical Tools in the Design and Implementation of Poverty Reduction Strategies (with PREM, APP)
15
External Partners (Illustrations)
Country Partner Country Partner Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs NORAD
Argentina Centro de Estudios Económicos de la Regulación, UADE Mongolia State Property Committee and the Manager/Coordinator for the Enterprise
Restructuring Project Benin Unv. Nat. Du Benin
West African Newsmedia and Dev. Centre Programme de Developpement Municiipal (PDM) (West Africa)
Paraguay Centro de Análisis y Difusión de Economía Paraguaya
Bosnia-Herzegovina Management and Information Technologies Center
Brazil ESAF Fundacao Joao Pinheiro
Canada Radio Canada CIDA
Philippines Institute of Corporate Directors University of Asia and the Pacific Institute for Solidarity in Asia Asian Development Bank
China Research Center for Regulation and Competition Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Whuan Univeristy
Commonwealth Commonwealth Press Union Commonwealth Broadcasting Association Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
Russia Press Development Institute, Moscow Graduate School of International Business Higher School of Economics, Baikal institute of Business and International Management
Cote d'Ivoire CREMIDE--Centre de Recherches Microeconomiques du Developpement
Denmakr General Danish Deve. Assistance Fund – Min. of Foreign Affairs
Singapore Singapore Institute of Directos Civil Service College of the Institute of Public Administration and Management National University of Singapore
Spain Ministry of Foreign Affiairs Instituto Ortega & Gassett Instituto Internacional de Gobernabilidad (IIG)
Sri Lanka
Institute of Policy Studies Sri Lanka Institute for Administrative Development
France OECD IBFI (Institut Bancaire et Financier International) / Banque de France ADETEF (Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances) BDPA – Institut Forhom HEC / CEBC (Centre d’Etudes sur le Blanchiment et la corruption) IIAP (Institut International d’Administration Publique) SOPEL International World Association of Newspapers
Germany Transparency International (TI)
Thailand
Chulalongkorn University - Distance Learning Center Thai Institute of Directors Association
Global Inter-Parliamentary Union Parliamentary Centre
The Netherlands European Journalism Center Amsterdam Institute for International Development Ministry of Foreign Affairs
UK Reuters Foundation Department for International Development (DFID)
Ukraine Institute for International Business Development
India Administrative Staff College of India National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration National Institute of Urban Affairs State Bank of India Staff College Tata Energy Research Institute New Delhi National Institute of Public Finance and Policy National Council of Applied Economic Research
Japan
Council for Better Corporate Citizenship Mitsubishi Research Institute, Inc.
Kazakhstan University of International Business (formerly International Business School)
Kyrgyz Republic State Commission Under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic on Securities Market
US Harvard Business School Ethics Officers Association International Federation of Accountants Agencia Internacional para el Desarrollo (USAID) Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID) Casals & Asociados Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Fundación para las Américas Organización de Estados Americanos (OEA)
Macedonia Trajkovski & Partners Consulting CPI OKO Faculty of Economics, University of "St. Ciryl and Methodius" Uzbekistan Tashkent State Economic University
México Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey Secretaría de Contraloría y Desarrollo Administrativo
Mongolia School of Economics of the Mongolian State University
Zimbabwe Municipal Development Program (East and Southern Africa)
16
An illustration in a Core Course:
Learning Program Cycle for Results on the Ground:
1. Joint Governance Empirical Diagnostic2. Participatory Formulation of Action Program3. Capacity Building: Specialized Learning Programs4. Collective Action Workshop; Adoption of program5. Adoption & Implementation (Operations, w/networks)6. Monitoring, Evaluation, Feedback Mechanisms
of A-C course
17
Country Learning Strategies: Key for Country Focus
• Country Strategy formulation process for collaborative action-orientation on the ground
• Complement with: i) ‘G-5’ approach to learning events, and, ii) action learning program cycle
• Classifying Countries: selectivity is key– Category 1: High Priority (10-12)– Category 2: High Risk-High Potential (10-12)– Category 3: Others with strong demand (10-15)
• Joint Design of Draft Country Learning Strategies– Based on Bank strategy documents (CAS, etc);
interface with colleagues (country teams, etc) diagnostics/empirics; specific commitments
18
Tanzania: An Example of a Country Strategy
• Designed for FYO2, w/ implications for FY03-04.• Primary Objective- to assist the Support
Accountability, Transparency, and Integrity Program (ATIP) - $40m loan for national framework for good governance
• Includes--empirical diagnostic work; strengthening oversight and watchdog institutions; governance monitoring; and media capacity building
• Drafted with input from the TTL Tanzania AFTI2
19
Strategy for Monitoring and Evaluation
• Key Substantive Challenge: Convergence between WB approach to M&E and how we recommend clients to do M&E (performance-based, continuous, quick feedback for changes, rigorous, affordable)
• Features– Level I and Level II – of course, but beyond…– Action programming – Official approval of action
plans– Capacity building – Creation of communities of
practice, procedural guidebooks, spin-off training activities
– Development of methodologies – Web-site hits/downloads; outside publications (ref), SSRN, etc.
– Mainstreaming – number of governance modules used in non GF-sponsored activities
20
Challenges and some Issues for Debate
1. Implementing Selectivity in an Umbrella Program:
i) saying No to work in some countries; ii) Say No to many components/topics within a country; iii) key complementarities vs. prioritization, and, iv) resisting simplistic participant-days bean-counting only…
2. Mainstreaming Governance in all programs: political sensitivities, still some unease?
3. Quality Assurance on Knowledge Deepening: ensuring quality at entry; M&E; analytical rigour
4. Frontier M&E, aligned to PSM approach5. Further deepening of partnerships 6. Resource Constraints: Implications http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/proglog.htm