12
Zooming-in and Zooming-out Computer Methods for Contingency Screening in Large Scale Power Networks Sanja Cvijid, Marija Ilid and Peter Feldmann Carnegie Mellon University IBM [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] March 13 th , 2012

Zooming-in and Zooming-out Computer Methods for ...electriconf/2012/slides/Section...Zooming-in and Zooming-out Computer Methods for Contingency Screening in Large Scale Power Networks

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Zooming-in and Zooming-out Computer Methods for Contingency Screening in

    Large Scale Power Networks

    Sanja Cvijid, Marija Ilid and Peter Feldmann

    Carnegie Mellon University IBM [email protected], [email protected] [email protected]

    March 13th, 2012

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Motivation

    Contingency Analysis: Each contingency very similar to the original network

    Why re-compute the whole DF matrix?

    Efficient distributed algorithm for solving ”DC” power flow

    Enable re-use of power flow data in normal operation and contingencies Repeat computations in the area with a contingency only

    Minimize exchange of information in multi-area environments

    2

  • Outline

    Distributed coordinated “DC” Power Flow Algorithm Internal Line Outage

    algorithm

    exchange of information

    Tie-Line Outage algorithm

    exchange of information

    AC Contingency Screening using continuation homotopy methods

    Conclusion and Future Work 3

  • 10-bus example: ZOOM-IN tree transf.[1-3]

    4

    S S

    S

    1A 2A

    3A

    1B 2B

    3B 4B 1C 2C

    3C

    S

    S

    S

    S

    S

    S

    1A 2A

    3A

    1B 2B

    3B 4B

    1C 2C

    3C

    ZOOM-IN

    S

    S

    S

    1 2 3

    ZOOM-IN (area k)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

  • 10-bus example: ZOOM-OUT tree transf.

    5

    S S

    S

    S S

    S

    A B

    C

    3 4

    ZOOM-OUT

    A B

    C

    4 5 6 ZOOM-OUT

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

  • Network Transformations and Exchange of Information

    Bidirectional transformations[2]

    “down”: topological transformations into a spanning tree 𝑋22 = 𝐶12

    𝑇 ∙ 𝑋11 ∙ 𝐶12

    “up”: computes line flows 𝐹1 = 𝐶12 ∙ 𝐹

    2

    6

    . . .

    𝑋(1) 𝑋(𝑛)

    𝐹(1) 𝐹(𝑛)

    ZOOM-IN (area 1)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area k)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area n)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-OUT

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    𝑋(𝑘) 𝐹(𝑘)

  • Internal Contingency

    7

    4

    6

    4 5

    6 7

    5

    7

    4

    6

    NORMAL OPERATION OUTAGE OF LINE 6-7

    7

    TREE REPRESENTATION

    . . .

    𝐹(1) 𝐹(𝑛)

    ZOOM-IN (area 1)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area k)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area n)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-OUT

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    𝑋(𝑘)𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝐹

    (𝑘)

  • Tie-line Contingency

    8

    A B

    C

    TREE REPRESENTATION OUTAGE OF LINE 3-8

    “up”

    . . .

    𝐹(1) 𝐹(𝑛)

    ZOOM-IN (area 1)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area k)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-IN (area n)

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    ZOOM-OUT

    tree

    trans. flow

    comp.

    𝐹(𝑘)

  • New approach to AC Contingency Screening

    9

    Base Case

    ACPF(x)=0

    Contingency k

    ACPF_ck(x)=0 y(λ)=(1-λ)*y

    homotopy

    easy hard

    λ 1 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homotopy

    9

    0

    Improves chances for global convergence

    Used for solving systems of nonlinear equations: f(x)=0

    Constructs a sequence of problems that lead to the problem of the interest

  • Homotopy for Ill-Conditioned Systems [4]

    Converges in cases when Newton-Raphson fails to converge

    Example: 11-bus system[5]

    10

    1.024∠0 1.103∠0.04 1.124∠0.067

    1.119∠0.061

    1.723∠0.363

    1.790∠0.473

    1.326∠0.453

    1.095∠0.060

    1.129∠0.089

    1.086∠0.301

    1.300∠0.354

    0.578∠0.380

    0.583∠0.525

    1.089∠0.102

    1.024∠0 1.072∠0.05 1.089∠0.083

    1.064∠0.072 1.042∠0.070

    0.778∠0.567

    0.426∠0.974

    0.589∠1.149

    DCPF ACPF homotopy

  • Conclusions & Future Work

    Algorithm for Contingency Screening

    more efficient distributed algorithm than the existing methods

    given fixed clustering into areas was assumed

    What is the optimal clustering for

    maximum computational efficiency

    minimum the amount of information exchange

    AC contingency screening based on homotopy

    examine different homotopy functions

    11

  • References

    12

    [1] H. H. Happ ,“Diakoptics and Piecewise Methods“, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1970

    [2] Sanja Cvijid, Marija Ilid, “Contingency Screening in a Multi-Control Area System Using Coordinated DC Power Flow”, ISGT Europe 2011, Manchester, December 2011

    [3] Sanja Cvijic, Marija Ilic “Contingency Screening in a Multi-Control Area System Using Coordinated DC Power Flow”, Carnegie Mellon University provisional patent filing, August 5, 2011

    [4] Peter Feldmann, Sanja Cvijic, “ Power Flow and Optimal Power Flow analysis using Homotopy methods”, IBM provisional patent filing: YOR8-2011-0847, August 22, 2011

    [5] S. Iwamoto, Y. Nakanishi and Y. Tamura, “A Load Flow Calculation for lcl-Conditioned Power Systems”, Electrical Engineering in Japan