Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    1/13

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Recent results released by leading hoteliers point towardsimproving occupancies, RevPARs and ADRS locally. Weexpect this positive earnings outlook to continue, given the

    positive outlook for the tourism sector. Our range ofscenarios for RevPAR growth is xx, given the limited supplygrowth until 2013.

    With occupancies recovering towards peak levels we couldsee room supply coming at a premium. Prospects fordiscount business with corporate transient customers.

    Tight supply environment an important tailwind for AfricanSun

    An increase in local salaries should boost local consumerspent while investment interest in the country should boostforeign business visitors

    An improvement in the global economy will also support thetourism industry.

    Better earnings visibility for Cresta Hospitality and Meikles,because of their simpler more defensive business model.Business travel and tourism is less fickle than leisure travelso the groups profits are likely to show defensive qualities.

    We also like African Sun because it has already expandedregionally, and is more diversified.

    Operating cost inflation, and subdued consumer andcorporate profits.The lack of incremental costs on newmanagement contracts should buoy results for African Sun

    Not cash generative because of capex projects.

    Prospects for hotels have strong longer term drivers,

    Economic growth and varied and unique tourist offering.

    Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook-From the zenith of hyperinflation to thenadir of deflation two worlds rolled into one: Zimbabwe

    Analyst: Tonderai. J .Maneswa Addmore .T. ChakuriraEmail:[email protected] [email protected]: +263 4 700 000 +263 4 700 000

    +263 772 895 024 +263 772 265 454

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    2/13

    A sweet spot f or t he ZSE in 2013

    After a largely indifferent year in 2012 the ZSE industrialindex reported a sterling performance in 2013 gaining a

    sturdy 32.6% compared to 4.3% in 2012. This was on theback of a better economic environment in 2012 and early2013 when corporates reported improved profitability. Theoverall performance of the industrial index was so strongthat in June 2013, before the harmonised election, thereturn on the index was close to 50%. Speculation on thereintroduction of the Zimbabwe dollar immediately afterthe election and unclear economic policies then dampenedinvestor enthusiasm resulting in the market losingmomentum during the third quarter. Reassurances fromthe Ministry of Finance (MoF) and the Reserve Bank ofZimbabwe (RBZ) on the continuation of the multicurrencysystem instilled confidence back into the market by thebeginning of the fourth quarter. The Mining Index for athird straight year receded to close the year with anegative return of 29.7% compared to -35% y-o-y in 2012and a loss of 49.8% in 2011. The industrial indexs gainswere bolstered by respectable performances from the bluechips, Delta, Econet, BATZ, Old Mutual, TSL and Padenga,while the mining index suffered due to unexcitingperformances from all four listed counters namely Falgold,Bindura, Hwange and RioZim. The solid performance of theindustrial index was anchored on the back ofpredominantly foreign trades owing to the trickle downeffects of quantitative easing (QE) in developed

    economies. Furthermore, investors were attracted to theZSE irrespective of the election due to the multiplecurrency regime which entails that foreign investors hadminimum exchange risk especially coming from a USDdenominated home country.

    On market capitalisation, the bourse closed the year atUSD 5.6bn compared to USD 3.9bn in the prior year. Thiswas mainly on the back of the upward price movement inheavily capitalised stocks such as Delta which closed theyear at USD 1.7bn (2012: USD 1.3bn). Other heavy weightcompanies that recorded solid gains include Econet up33.3%, BATZ +228%, TSL +264%, Innscor +14.3%, Old Mutual

    +66% and Seed Co +16.9%. Total turnover at USD 485.7mwas 8.4% higher than 2012 and foreign participationdominated across the board.

    Going forward, we expect a largely mixed year ahead dueto the tapering in the US economy that was initiatedtowards the end of 2013. According to World Bankestimates close to USD 64bn was withdrawn fromdeveloping-country mutual funds between June and August2013. We expect the tapering to also negatively impactportfolio allocation in frontier markets as investors returnto traditional markets where portfolio alphas are lookingpositive. On the other hand an improvement in developed

    economies will improve demand for commodities fromdeveloping countries but the outlook remain mixed overall.

    Equity ResearchZimbabweJanuary 2014

    Macroeconomic

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Indices performance since dollarisation

    I ndustrial I ndex(LHS) Mining (RHS)

    TOP TEN MOVERS 31-12-2012 31-12-2013 Move(Usc)%Change

    TSL 11 40 29 264%

    BATZ 365 1200 3 229%

    AFRICAN SUN 0.9 2.7 217 200%

    MASIMBA 2.93 6.5 0.7 122%

    AFDIS 14 30 2.2 114%

    FMHL 5.2 10 46 92%

    FBCH 7.5 13.5 0.5 80%

    LAFARGE 65 110 5 69%

    PADENGA 4.75 8 17 68%

    OLD MUTUAL 152 253 30 66%

    BOTTOM TEN MOVERS 31-12-2012 31-12-2013 Move(Usc)%Change

    FALGOLD 16.5 4.5 -12 -73%

    HWANGE 19.5 7 -12.5 -64%

    ZIMPLOW 6.5 3.5 -3 -46%

    TA HOLDING 11 6 -5 -45%ARISTON 1.3 0.8 -0.5 -38%

    CAFCA 45 28 -17 -38%

    RIO ZIM 52 33 -19 -37%

    AICO 9 6 -3 -33%

    ART ZDR 0.45 0.3 -0.15 -33%

    NTS 3 2 -1 -33%

    Zimbabwe Review and Outlook 2014

    2

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    3/13

    -8.0%

    -5.0%

    -2.0%

    1.0%

    4.0%

    90

    92

    94

    96

    98

    100

    102

    Consumer Price Index

    CPI (LHS) M-o-M (RHS) y-oy Source: ZimStats So u r c e : I E S; R BZ ; M i n i s t r y o f F i n a n c e

    Source: IES; RBZ; Mini str y of Finance

    Macroeconomic environment overview

    The possibility of Deflation looms large

    In a classical case of a taste of two worlds the local economy

    is currently undergoing a slow and painful period of

    downward price adjustment. Having experiencedhyperinflation in the not so distant past the possibility of the

    economy deflating looms large due to a consistent decline in

    the prices of goods and services. As illustrated by the charts

    on consumer price index and Y-o-Y Inflation and M3 growth

    rates on the right, there has been a consistent decline in

    money supply growth since September 2011 from above 30%

    to below 5% indicating that liquidity in the local economy has

    been gradually drying up. This reflects that some banks are

    fully loaned out and there is no money in the system to loan

    out to productive sectors. A high concentration of

    nonperforming loans on the balance sheet of banks isworsening the liquidity problem. Furthermore, as a net

    importer of manufactured goods the economy is utilising the

    little hard currency to support consumption (see graph on

    BOP on the bottom right), thus the growth in money supply

    has progressively declined and turned negative in November

    2013. The continued decline in inflation during the same

    period indicates a combination of a decline in money supply

    and the weakening of the South African rand. Although the

    Minister of Finance Mr. Patrick Chinamasa imposed duty on

    some imported products the scope for the rand to devalue

    remains high. In our view, inflation is likely to continue on adownward spiral owing to the weakening of the ZAR against a

    basket of hard currencies. The weakness on the ZAR as a

    currency due to domestic and international concerns will put

    downward strain on the ZAR against other hard currencies

    and we do not expect a quick recovery on the ZAR. On the

    other hand the weakening of the ZAR will make South Africa

    a cost effective production centre compared to Zimbabwe

    thus companies will have an incentive to continue producing

    from South Africa than Zimbabwe making the country a net

    importer of manufactured goods. The unbalanced trade

    equation between the two countries will be difficult to

    equalise as long as Zimbabwe is using a currency which is

    stronger than South Africa where it imports most of its

    consumables from and the Zimbabwean government does not

    have the ability to print money to control its currency.

    Estimates from the IMF indicate that the USD is 15%

    overvalued in Zimbabwe. Furthermore, the continued

    absence of foreign direct investment implies that the balance

    of payment will remain negative at USD 4.0bn by close of

    fiscal year 2013. Imported inflation remained very low after

    the ZAR lost ground against major hard currencies, in

    particular to the United States dollar. According to an Article

    IV report on Zimbabwe by the IMF, the CPI inflation rate in

    Strategy Note

    -4,000

    -2,000

    0

    2,000

    4,000

    6,000

    8,000

    10,000

    2009A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 Est. 2014 Prj. 2015 Prj.

    Balance of Payments Accounts

    Ex po rt s i n U SD m I mp or ts in USD m Cur re nt Ac co un t B al an ce s (U SD m)

    Source: IES; RBZ; Mini str y of Finance

    3

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    4/13

    Zimbabwe is highly associated with both the CPI and PPI

    inflation rates in South Africa with a lag of approximately

    five months, mostly due to the high share of imports from

    South Africa. Regression results indicate that a 1-

    percenatge point increase in the CPI inflation rate in South

    Africa leads to 0.6 percentage point increase in the CPI

    inflation rate in Zimbabwe five months later.

    Weak GDP growth forecast for 2014

    The economy is estimated to have grown by 3.4% in 2013

    from 10.6% realised in 2012 as reflected by the

    macroeconomic framework table and the nominal GDP and

    Real GDP growth rates graph. On the other hand the World

    Bank estimate that the economy grew by 2.2% in 2013 and

    its expected to grow at 3.3% in 2014. This estimate is

    dwarfed by the MoF estimate which projects a GDP growth

    of 6.1% anchored by a sturdy growth in agriculture (+9.0%)

    and an improved performance in mining (+11.4%) and

    construction (+11.0%) sectors. Our view is that the WorldBank estimates are achievable given the current operating

    environment and the possibility of deflation. The 2014

    Budget will be based on revenues of approximately USD

    4.1bn which is about 29.3% of projected nominal GDP (USD

    14.0bn). Tax revenues are expected to constitute USD

    3.8bn while non-tax revenue will contribute USD 296.0m.

    The major drive of growth in the agriculture subsector will

    be tobacco which is expected to grow by 2.6% to 170,000

    tonnes after a 15% growth in 2013 as reflected by the GDP

    growth rates table. This growth is mainly on account of

    increased planted area of about 90,000ha from the

    88,600ha planted in 2013. The number of registered

    growers increased from 70,904 in the 2012/13 season to

    91,278 farmers and indications are that 1,024,000 grammes

    of tobacco seedlings were sold compared to 802,000

    grammes in the prior year. Maize production for the year

    2013 stood at 0.8m tonnes versus a target of 1.1m tonnes

    and the authorities are targeting an ambitious tonnage of

    1.3m in 2014. Cotton is targeted to grow by 27.8% to close

    the year at 178,900 tonnes from a revised output of

    140,000 tonnes.

    The mining sector is expected to grow by 11.4% up from

    6.5% recorded in 2013 on the back of a very ambitious

    beneficiation drive to process minerals locally. Metal prices

    however are expected to remain stagnate at the current

    levels. Gold production is projected to grow by 7.1% to

    15,000 kgs while platinum is forecast to grow by 8% to

    14,000 kgs in 2014. Diamonds production is expected to

    increase from 11m carats to 12m carats in 2014 and other

    metals that are expected to record growth include

    palladium from 9,800kgs to 11,200kgs while Nickel is

    forecast to grow to 15,020 tonnes in 2014.

    Macro-economic framework

    2009A 2 010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 Est. 2014 Prj. 2015 Prj.

    Nominal GDP level in USDm 8,157.0 9,457.0 10,956.0 12,472.0 13,099.0 14 ,0 65 .0 1 5, 22 8. 0

    Real GDP growth (%) 5.4 11.4 11.9 10.6 3.4 6.1 6.4

    World Bank GDP at Mkt Prices(%pa) (5.9) 9.6 9.4 4.4 2.2 3.3 3.4

    World Bank Current Acc Bal/GDP(%) (12.2) (10.3) (23.0) (19.7) (21.9) (17.6) (14.7)

    Annual inflation (average %) (7.7) 3.0 3.5 3.8 1.7 1.5 2Revenue (Tax and non-tax) 933.6 2,198.2 2,770.4 3,451.8 3,722.2 4,120.0 4,340.5

    Expenditure & Net Lending 966.0 2,228.0 3,102.0 3,746.0 4,057.0 4,120.0 4,340.0

    Revenue as a% of GDP 11.4% 23.2% 25.3% 27.7% 28.4% 29.3% 28.5%

    Expenditure as a % of GDP 11.8% 23.6% 28.3% 30.0% 31.0% 29.3% 28.5%

    Balance of Payments Accounts

    Exports in USD m 1,796.0 3,541.0 4,771.0 4,355.0 4,430.0 5,024.0 5,524.0

    Imports in USD m 3,662.0 5,834.0 8,491.0 7,456.0 7,682.0 8,321.0 8,690.0Source: IES; RBZ; Ministry of Finance, World Bank

    0

    2,000

    4,000

    6,000

    8,000

    10,000

    12,000

    14,000

    16,000

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    2009A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 A 2013 Est. 2014 Prj. 2015 Prj.

    Nominal GDP & Real GDP growth Rate

    Nominal GDP level in USDm(RHS) Real GDP growth MoF(%pa) World Bank GDP at Mkt Prices(%pa)

    So u r c e : I E S; R BZ ; M i n i s t r y o f F i n a n c e

    GDP Growth Rates

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 EST 2014 Proj 2015 Proj

    Agric, Hunting and Fishing 38% 7.20% 1.40% 7.80% -1.30% 9.0% 5.1%

    Mining and quarrying 18.90% 37.40% 24.40% 8.00% 6.50% 11.4% 9.2%

    Manufacturing 17% 2.00% 13.80% 5 .30% 1 .50% 3.2% 6.5%

    Electricity and water 1.90% 19.50% 6.40% 0.30% 4.30% 4.5% 7.0%

    Construction 2.10% 14.10% 65.10% 23.50% 10.00% 11.0% 13.5%

    Finance and insurance 4.50% 8.30% 8.30% 28.00% 2.60% 6.3% 6.2%

    Real Estate 2.00% 4.90% 48.90% 59.00% 10.00% 11.0% 13.5%

    Distr, hotels and Restaurants 6.50% 8.80% 4.30% 4.30% 3.40% 5.1% 5.0%

    Transport and Comm 2.20% 4.70% 0.00% 6.70% 3.40% 4.0% 5.5%

    GDP at mkt prices 5.40% 11.40% 11.90% 10.60% 3.40% 6.1% 6.4%

    Source: IES; RBZ; Ministry of Finance

    4

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    5/13

    Stock of External debt

    2011 2012DebtIncTotalArrearsUSDm

    TotalArrearsstockUSDm

    DebtIncTotalArrearsUSDm

    TotalArrearsstockUSDm

    Paris Club 2,858 2,431 3,017 2,650

    Non-Paris Club 491 92 572 102BilateralCreditors

    3,349 2,523 3,591 2,751

    AFDB 622 565 636 582

    World Bank 1,335 905 1,348 937IMF 121 121 125 125

    EIB 293 255 302 268Others 110 74 75 45

    MultilateralCreditors

    2,481 1,921 2,487 1,960

    Nominal DebtIndicators (%)Debt/GDP 35 49Debt/Revenue 200 173

    Debt/Exports 130 149Arrears/Export 93 10

    Arrears/GDP 44 38

    Source: IES; Minist ry of Finance

    AFDB25%

    World Bank54%

    IMF5%

    E.I.B12%

    Others4%

    Multilateral Creditors

    Source: IES; Minist ry of Finance

    The staff monitored programme by the IMF was

    extended by another six months to June 2014 and this

    remains the biggest hope of a complete and

    comprehensive engagement with the international

    community.

    Manufacturing sector capacity utilisation remained

    subdued at approximately 39.6% in 2013 from 44.9% in

    2012 and a figure of 40% - 45% is expected in 2014. The

    sector is projected to grow modestly at 3.2% in 2014

    from 1.5% in 2012 driven by growth in foodstuffs,

    tobacco, drinks and beverages. The manufacturing

    sector capacity utilisation has stalled due to archaic

    equipment and obsolete systems which continue to make

    the subsector uncompetitive compared to imports. Thisis exacerbated by an acute shortage of long term funding

    at competitive rates.

    The proposed Macro-Economic and Budget Framework

    faces a number of risks inter alia; a poor rainfall season,

    budget pressures particularly from employment costs,

    low Foreign Direct Investment due to slow investor

    response, little progress on the debt resolution and the

    re-engagement process, lack of clarity on key policies,

    particularly the Indigenisation and Economic

    Empowerment programme and slow progress on

    implementation of key policies.

    The debt overhang inhibiting borrowing capacity

    The country has accumulated huge stocks of both

    external and internal debt with international financial

    institutions and bilateral creditors. Most of this debt is in

    arrears and this has negatively impacted the

    creditworthiness and the ability of the country to access

    fresh capital. The government in 2010 approved the

    Zimbabwe Accelerated Arrears Clearance Debt and

    Development Strategy (ZAADDS) in order to pave the wayfor negotiating the clearance of arrears and debt relief

    for the country. One of the key mandates of ZAADDS was

    to undertake a validation and reconciliation exercise of

    Zimbabwes public and publicly guaranteed external

    debt with all creditors as shown in the Multilateral

    Creditors pie chart on the right. Total external public

    and publicly guaranteed debt (excluding Reserve Bank

    and Private sector external debt) as at 31 December

    2012, stood at USD 6.1bn (49% of GDP). Of that total

    external debt, penalty charges accounted for USD 1.03bn

    (17% of total external debt). As reflected in the table onthe Stock of external debt the Debt to GDP ratio is at

    49% and Debt to Revenue is at 173% while Debt to

    exports is at 149%. Although these ratios are high in

    absolute terms compared with other countries they

    indicate that the country is not over geared. The major

    difference with other countries is on arrears where

    Zimbabwe lags significantly and this is the area where

    the sovereign credibility is weak. Engagement with both

    multilateral and bilateral institutions remains paramount

    to the complete clearance of this economic burden.

    5

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    6/13

    Banking sector developments

    A highly segmented banking sector

    The banking sector exhibited a two-tiered scenario with

    those banks that are well capitalised and prudent on

    lending on the one side and those not well capitalised

    and more cavalier on lending on the other side. This

    was given further credence by the absence of a lenderof last resort as well as a nonexistent interbank market.

    To some extent the absence of the lender of last resort

    did help the banking industry to thrive in a very tight

    liquidity environment as systemic risk was completely

    eliminated amongst banks. If the interbank market was

    active contagion could have easily spread from the

    affected institutions to other healthier banks. The

    fortuitous quarantine meant that for the three closed

    banks exposure to other unrelated financial institutions

    was virtually zero. Furthermore, the other struggling

    banks remain in limbo and funding can only be providedby shareholders. The major reasons for these bank

    failures are persistent vulnerabilities in the financial

    sector steaming from low level of capital, insufficient

    liquidity, poor asset quality and related-party

    exposures, persistent losses and weak corporate

    governance and internal control deficiencies. However,

    the reserve bank successfully transferred non-core

    assets and liabilities to a special purpose debt

    resolution entity, managed by the Ministry of Finance,

    in an effort to build capacity to perform its mandate of

    monetary policy administration effectively.

    Figures released by the RBZ in November 2013

    indicated that banking deposits were estimated at USD

    3.8bn an annual decline of 0.46% as shown in the

    banking sector deposit graph. The nature of deposits

    remains predominately short-term as reflected by the

    pie chart: Banking Deposits in November. The report

    indicated that on a m-o-m basis, broad money

    declined by USD 144.6m (3.66%) to USD 3.8bn from

    USD 4.0bn in October 2013. The decline was largely on

    the back of panic withdrawals experienced in the

    banking sector. After ZANU PF won the electionspeculation was rife that the Zim dollar would return

    and that is why a run on the banks was experienced.

    Unconfirmed sources speculate that there is a

    considerable amount of money that left the system

    during and immediately after the elections estimated

    at approximately USD 800.0m. Outstanding credit to

    the private sector amounted to USD 3.5bn, constituting

    91% of total deposits as reflected in the credit to

    private sector November 2013 pie chart.

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    -

    500

    1,000

    1,5002,000

    2,500

    3,000

    3,500

    4,000

    4,500

    Oct- 11 D ec- 11 F eb- 12 A pr- 12 Ju n- 12 A ug -1 2 Oct- 12 D ec- 12 F eb-1 3 A pr-1 3 J un -1 3 A ug -1 3

    Banking Sector Deposits, Loans and Advances

    D eposi ts(USD )(L HS) Tota l loans and a dva nces(U SD )(L HS) L oan to D eposit Ratio(L HS)

    Source: IES; RBZ; Mi nistr y of Finance

    10.4

    12.7

    24

    52.9

    Banking Sectors Deposits November 2013(%)

    Savings Long te rm Unde r 30-days De mand

    Source: IES; RBZ; Mi nistr y of Finance

    Source: IES; RBZ; Minist ry of Finance

    6

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    7/13

    As of November 2013 the major recipients of the loans

    were agriculture 17.7% (2012:21.7%), distribution 17.6%

    (2012:20%), manufacturing 15.6% (2012:19.5%) and

    households 16.1% (2012:13.2%). Although the mining

    sector is expected to anchor the economy, lending to

    that sector has remained very limited due to the short

    term nature of deposits. Credit to the private sector

    was mainly utilised for asset purchases (44.8%) as well

    as inventory build-up (33.9%). Loans and advancesutilised for fixed investments activity have remained

    low with the procurement of plant and equipment

    accounting for 3.31% and pre and post shipment

    financing at 1.61% of total loans and advances.

    Level of nonperforming loans at 16%

    The period under review saw a spike in the level of

    nonperforming loans from 12.3% to above 16%.

    According to the IMF the NPL problem is in the worst

    case one of resolving troubled institutions, and in

    others, one of addressing underlying weaknesses toallow viable banks to gradually reduce NPL ratios

    through write-offs, work-outs and growth. Sorting out

    the NPL situation would improve the capacity of the

    banks to ensure sustainable growth in private sector

    credit and enhance financial sector stability. Recent

    reports from the Bankers Association of Zimbabwe

    estimates that more than 16% of loans mainly

    concentrated in six banks are not performing. Although

    loan origination from weak banks has subsided most

    banks continue to be haunted by the legacy of

    imprudent lending at the onset of dollarisation.Indications from the banking sector are that NPLs are

    actually higher than the reported figure of 16% and are

    estimated at 20% which is miles ahead of the prudential

    regional benchmark of 5%. The NPLs are extremely high

    when compared to the prudential 3% promulgated in the

    Basel III requirements. In our view, NPLS could rise

    further given the tight liquidity environment and the

    huge possibility that the economy can go into deflation.

    With some banks engaged in the poor practice of

    continuously rolling over poorly performing assets as a

    way of hiding NPLs we believe vulnerabilities in thesector remain elevated. We continue to reiterate that

    most of the lending decisions have been based on the

    size of the collateral being offered and relationships

    rather than cash flow. In the absence of credible

    information compounded by the absence of the national

    credit bureau, abuse by clients will remain high and

    rampant. Furthermore, the value of the collateral,

    which is real estate in most cases, tends to be

    overstated and inevitably harder to realise if the need

    arises. This has allowed the official NPLs numbers to be

    low. In our view, many banks are sitting on a significant

    unknown quantity of NPLs and they continue to be rolled

    over. The planned re-introduction of the interbank market

    as well as the recapitalisation of the Central Bank are

    welcome developments as these are expected to ease the

    liquidity constraints. Nonetheless, we are still to see the

    modalities of the proposed USD 100.0m interbank market to

    be guaranteed by Afreximbank. Our initial view is that an

    injection of new money is unlikely under the programme in

    which case the liquidity woes are unlikely to subside.Furthermore, the 5 year TBs at 5% p.a. to be issued for the

    RBZ debt are expected to ease the liquidity crunch

    depending on acceptance.

    Government finances

    According to the 2014 MoF budget, revenue was estimated

    at USD 3.4bn in November and was expected to have

    reached USD 3.72bn by December 2013, slightly below the

    original budget estimate of UISD 3.86bn. The budget

    experienced a number of shocks from unbudgeted but

    inescapable programmes such as the referendum and theelection against very low revenue inflow especially in the

    second half of the year. Unlike the previous year the

    revenue target of USD 3.9bn was not revised significantly

    indicating that the economy largely performed to

    expectations. Tax and non-tax revenue were expected to

    close the year at USD 3.6bn and USD 0.2m respectively. The

    negative variance of 1% on the budget could have been

    higher had it not been offset by the once-off unbudgeted

    non-tax collections from the renewal of licence fees from

    mobile telecommunication companies, whose business

    licences generated USD 145.5m (Econet alone paid USD137m). Of the USD 61.0m target revenue from diamonds

    nothing was received from this sector compared to USD

    84.2m received in 2012. Tax revenues which are directly

    linked to the performance of the economy performed

    below the target for most of the period under review,

    reflecting the overall economic slowdown. Tax revenue of

    USD 3.01bn were collected against a target of USD 3.21bn.

    For the period to November 2013, recurrent expenditure

    was estimated at USD 2.43bn from an initial estimate of

    USD 2.28bn representing 68.9% of the budget a slight

    improvement on 2012s 70% and 80% in 2011. Theexpenditure composition remains skewed towards recurrent

    expenditure at 69% contrary to best practice of allocating

    30% of total revenue to recurrent expenditure. The overrun

    in recurrent expenditure is a result of the planned cost of

    living review affected in January 2013.

    The cash budget continued to reflect a cash deficit during

    the year which increased domestic arrears accumulation

    and the position was worsened by an increase in employee

    allowances and unbudgeted recruitment. Fiscal stress was

    aggravated by underperforming diamond revenues during

    the year.

    7

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    8/13

    Unsustainable reserve levels of 0.3 months

    In a hard currency economy, reserves are not only

    insurance against external shocks, but also a key tool

    for managing domestic financial instability. Thus an

    import cover of only 0.3 months indicates that the

    country is vulnerable to vacillations in import price

    movements especially in the event of a currency

    shortage. With low liquid assets of its own, the RBZ

    can provide only limited short-term liquidity to banks,

    and cannot be the ultimate guarantor of the stability

    of the financial and payments systems in the event of

    a systemic bank run.

    Political Outlook in 2014

    After a prolonged period of haggling the principles to

    Zimbabwes Global Political Agreement (GPA)-ZANU

    PF, MDC-T and MDC agreed on a new constitution on

    17 January 2013. The final draft of the constitution

    was tabled in Parliament on 6 February 2013. Aconstitutional referendum was subsequently held on

    16 March, with an overwhelming majority of the votes

    supporting adoption of the new constitution. After the

    referendum the draft constitution went back to

    Parliament as the Constitutional Bill and was passed by

    the House of Assembly on 14 May and by the Senate on

    15 May. This paved the way for the holding of

    harmonised elections in July 2013. The cost of the

    constitution was close to USD 53m, while the elections

    cost USD 125.4m. The funding for the elections was

    mainly from internal resources including an increase in

    excise duty on fuel by USD 0.05/litre for a period of 10

    months, USD 40.0m in one year treasury bills to

    domestic non-bank financial institution as well as

    revenue from mobile phone operating licence fees.

    After a largely credible and peaceful harmonised

    election in July 2013 ZANU PF won a clear mandate to

    govern for the next five years. The party won clear

    majorities in parliament and the senate with more

    than two thirds majorities, giving the party the power

    to effect legislation in the country. Furthermore, the

    party also won the presidential race and its candidateRobert Mugabe was sworn-in in August 2013 for the

    next five years with a possibility of re-election in 2018

    in accordance with the new constitution. The message

    from government has largely been positive and

    courteous. The IMF staff monitored programme is

    ongoing and avenues to engage with the international

    community are being explored. Concerns however

    remain on the political will to rein in fiscal

    indiscipline, tolerance of dissenting voices, freedom of

    expression and association as well as respect for

    property rights.

    2013 Contribution to revenue

    VAT 39%

    Companies 4%

    Individualls 15%

    Non-tax Revenue 6%Excise Duties 7%

    Other Taxes 3%

    CustomsDuty 26%

    Source: IES; IMF Art icle IV

    Source: IES; IMF Art icle IV

    1.20

    0.50

    0.40

    0.20

    0.30

    0.40

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    1.20

    1.40

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    International Reserves

    Usable International reserves(USDm)(LHS) Months of imports (RHS)

    Source: IES; IMF Art icle IV

    0.3

    4.7

    4.8

    15.9

    0 5 10 15 20

    Zimbabwe

    South Africa

    Lesotho

    Botswana

    International Resrves (months of prospective imports)

    8

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    9/13

    Equities market developments

    The industrial index recorded a remarkable gain of 32.6%

    during the 2013 period to close the year at 202.12 points.

    This solid performance was anchored on significant foreign

    trading as evidence by a total of USD 291m shares bought

    and USD 195m shares sold. Total turnover for the entire

    bourse came in at USD 486m for the year. Foreign

    participation was solid because of two fundamentally

    important issues, firstly the local bourse and the economyis hard currency denominated (USD mainly) and this

    eliminated exchange losses associated with investing in

    frontier markets and secondly quantitative easing (QE) in

    the United States had a positive effect on frontier market

    including the ZSE. The effect of QE can be substantiated

    by the fact that all bourses in Africa, barring South Africa,

    were positive in real terms during 2013 a clear indication

    that a large chunk of the cash injected into these

    developed economies found its way onto global equity

    markets as portfolio investment.

    Sectors that performed relatively better in 2013 include

    the FMCG, food retail, Agro-Industrials, telecoms and

    beverages. A total of 10 companies were delisted from the

    bourse and two were suspended during 2013.

    2014 Equity Outlook

    Going forward we expect the bourse to be largely

    defensive in 2013 owing to the ongoing tapering in the

    USA. This will impact the Zimbabwean economy in two

    ways. Firstly there is the inescapable fact that there will

    be reduced portfolio inflows on the ZSE and secondly thereduction in QE will make the USD appreciate against any

    other currency which will further erode our manufacturing

    competitiveness. Assuming a deflationary environment in

    2014 companies that are expected to do well are those

    with strong cash generating capacity, low gearing and

    most importantly a skilled management team. With

    demand expected to weaken, liquidity to tighten,

    currency to appreciate and international interest rates to

    rise it will be heinous to invest in a highly leveraged

    company because the prospect of financial distress are

    high. Telecoms, brewers, agro-based manufactures andselected defensive FMCG will do admirably well in a

    defensive strategy geared towards value preservation

    compared to growth. We urge investors to stay clear of

    the banks, manufacturing and mining counters due to high

    capital demands in these sectors as well as deep rooted

    concerns of technological obsolescence in the current

    state of operations. Indications on the ground are pointing

    towards a very difficult year from both the fiscal

    performance and private sector participation.

    Unfortunately we expect more companies to file for

    judicial management and some will be liquidated as theinescapable effects of deflation bite.

    2013 in Chartes

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    31-Dec-12 28-Feb-13 30-Apr-13 30-Jun-13 31-Aug-13 31-Oct-13 31-Dec-1

    Millio

    ns

    ZSE 2013 Volume Traded

    Sour ce: IES; ZSE

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    16.00

    31-D ec-12 28-Fe b-13 30-Ap r-13 30-Ju n-13 31-Au g-13 31-Oct-13 31-D ec-

    Millions($)

    ZSE Value Traded USD

    Sour ce: IES; ZSE

    -4.00

    -2.00

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    31-Dec-12

    21-Jan-13

    11-Feb-13

    04-Mar-13

    25-Mar-13

    15-Apr-13

    06-May-13

    27-May-13

    17-Jun-13

    08-Jul-13

    29-Jul-13

    19-Aug-13

    09-Sep-13

    30-Sep-13

    21-Oct-13

    11-Nov-13

    02-Dec-13

    23-Dec-13

    Millions

    Net Foreign Value Traded USD

    Sour ce: IES; ZSE

    0.00

    1.00

    2.00

    3.00

    4.00

    5.00

    6.00

    7.00

    Billions

    ZSE Market Cap USD

    Sour ce: IES; ZSE

    9

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    10/13

    2014 Picks

    Buy Recommendations

    Market Cap

    (USDm)

    Updated recommendation

    Hist. +1 Hist. +1 31.12.13

    Afdis 37.7 15.6 5.6 4.1 28.6 44.5 Dominant market share in the spirits mass

    market which has high g rowth potential.

    Increasing volumes and eff iciencies keeping

    competitive pricing especially after rights issue

    BATZ 47.3 16.0 43.8 13.8 247.6 309.0 Dominant market share. Strong cash

    generation. Generous dividend policy.

    Impressive RoaE and RoaA.

    Delta 15.6 12.5 5.3 4.4 1,731.1 2,098.6 Pristine balance sheet, strong cashflows and

    solid brands . Virtually a monopoly. Volume

    traction likely to be maintained.

    Econet 7.7 4.1 2.0 1.5 984.0 1,124.8 Undemanding ratings. Dominant market share

    and significant growth potential in the sector.Head start over other players in terms of

    penetration data. Nonetheless, governance

    issues are a concern.

    Innscor 11.1 10.6 2.9 2.4 433.3 547.0 Perenial perfomer. Defensive businesses with

    attractive medium to long-term prospects .

    Strong cash generation.

    Mash Holdings 14.9 12.8 0.6 0.6 60.4 62.5 Divers ified property portfolio. Improv ing

    average renta ls per square metre and renta l

    yields.Trading at a discount to property value

    and replacement cost.

    National Foods 10.2 8.7 2.4 2.0 141.9 164.5FMCG company with dominant brands across

    defensive food products like mealie meal and

    flour. S trong manag ement and s trategic

    partners from parent companies.

    OK Zimbabwe 18.7 13.0 3.3 2.7 230.9 259.2 Defensive food business and extensive branch

    network. Improving dis pos able incomes

    expected to support earnings growth

    Padenga 8.0 7.5 0.8 0.8 43.3 69.7 Renowned for large premium quality skins

    production. Opportunities to ex tend into

    production of alligators and saltwater

    Seed Co 20.2 10.7 2.1 2.0 175.4 237.3 Dominant market share (80%) of the local

    hybrid seed maize. Huge demand for seed in

    the region. We are confident on future

    performance and believe shareholders will be

    richly rewarded.Exposure can be get through

    AICO after the consummation of the impending

    transctions

    TSL 25.0 18.4 1.4 1.3 138.9 154.6 Strong balance sheet. Good asset play.

    Volumes improving at Bak Logistics. Energetic

    and skilled management

    PER PBVIES Fair

    Value (USDm)

    10

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    11/13

    Ones to watch

    Market Cap

    (USDm)

    IES USD Fair

    Value (USDm)

    Updated recommendation

    Hist. +1 Hist. +1 31.12.13

    CBZH 2.4 2.0 0.6 0.5 102.7 123.1 Well capitalised. Largest banking group in

    Zimbabwe by all metrices. Receding asset

    quality pressures quality given the increasing

    tenure.

    Colcom 28.8 16.0 14.9 0.1 39.8 51.2 Strong brand equity that is supporterd by a

    track record of product excellence. Product

    reengineering and reposition was done in 2013.

    Rolling out of new products underway

    Dairibord 42.0 na 1.7 1.0 56.4 64.4 A victim of intense competition from the

    region. Management has failed to retool the

    company in time however there is basis for a

    recovery given the right skills at the top.

    FBCH 6.2 5.4 0.7 0.6 89.7 96.8 A well run financial instituation, very liquid andvery minimum NPLs. A highly conservative and

    prudent management with vast experience in

    the local banking industry.

    Hippo 14.5 12.5 0.9 0.9 173.8 222.0 High cash generative abilities, sound

    management. Technical support from Tongaat

    Hulett.

    Lafarge 14.9 12.5 2.6 2.1 88.0 93.6 Demand for cement remains strong. Improving

    efficiencies to result in improved margins.

    Meikles 15.6 12.7 3.0 2.7 45.8 65.9 Unbundling of retail operations and the

    agricultural concern could unlock value for

    shareholders. Supermarkets are recovering well

    and hotels are profitable. Group has strong

    defensive characteristics and solid market

    position.

    Truworths 13.6 11.0 2.3 2.0 16.1 19.8 Truworths entered into an agreement with

    CABS whereby the bank wil buy recievables

    from Truwothrs at discount. This has made

    Truworths a very liquid reatiler and prospects

    for growing retain sales is high. However the

    company is very prudent on credit extension.

    Turnall 350.2 18.9 1.4 0.8 25.9 35.2 Turnall dominates the local low cost housing

    market holding 80% of the local roofing market

    and processes 60% to 70% of Zimbabwesroofing and piping products

    PER PBV

    11

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    12/13

    Sell /Take Profit Recommendations

    PER PBV Market Cap

    (USDm)

    Updated recommendation

    Hist +1 Hist +1 31.12.11

    G/Beltings na na 0.0 0.0 0.4 na Weak financial position will adversely affectgroup future prospects.

    Pelhams 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 1.0 na Low disposable incomes. Limited credit

    facilities for high ticket goods.

    TA Holdings 4.4 2.4 0.3 0.3 9.9 na Agro-chemicval investments continue to

    haemorrage the group on oudated technology.

    Substantial investment required for new

    technology.

    Zeco na na 0.0 0.0 0.1 na Undercapitalised businesses. Company unlikely

    to see much growth with troughs outweighing

    peaks.

    IES USD Fair

    Value (USDm)

    12

  • 8/13/2019 Zimbabwe Macroeconomic Report 2013 Review and 2014 Outlook

    13/13

    NOTES

    Imara CapitalSecuritiesBotswanaBlock 6, SecondFloor, MorojwaMews,Plot 74769

    WesternCommercialRoad, New CBDGaboroneBotswana

    Imara AfricaSecurities ( Adivision of ImaraSP Reid)Imara House,Block 3

    257 Oxford RoadIllovoJohannesburg,2146South AfricaTel:+27 11 5506200Fax:+27 11 5506295

    Imara SecuritiesAngolaSCVM LimitadaRua Rainha Ginga74, 13thFloor,Luanda, AngolaTel: +244 222 372029/36Fax: +244 222332 340

    Imara EdwardsSecurities (Pvt.)Ltd.Tendeseka OfficePark1st Floor Block 2

    Samora MachelAve.Harare, ZimbabweTel: +2634790590Fax:+2634791435

    4 Fanum HouseCnr. LeopoldTakawira/JosiahTongogara StreetBulawayoTel: +263 9 74554Fax: +263 966024Members of t he

    Zimbabwe Stock

    Exchange

    Imara S P Reid(Pty)LtdImara House257 Oxford RoadIllovo 2146

    P.O. Box 969Johannesburg2000South AfricaTel: +27 11 5506200Fax: +27 11 5506295Member of t he

    JSE Secur it ies

    Exchange

    Namibia EquityBrokers (Pty) Ltd1st Floor CityCentreBuilding, WestWing

    Levinson ArcadeWindhoekNamibiaTel: +264 61246666Fax: +26461256789Member of t he

    Namibia Stock

    Exchange

    StockbrokersMalawi LtdGround FloorNBM BusinessCentreCnr. Hanover

    Avenue/Henderson StreetBlantyreMalawiTel: +2651822803Member of t he

    Malawi Stock

    Exchange

    StockbrokersZambia Ltd2nd Floor (Wing),Stock ExchangeBuildingCentral Park

    CornerChurch/CairoRoadsP O Box 38956LusakaZambiaTel: +260211232455Fax: +260211224055Member of t he

    Zambia

    St ock Exchange

    This research report is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for any securities. The securities referred to in this report maynot be eligible for sale in some jurisdictions. The information contained in this report has been compiled by Imara Edwards Securities (Pvt.) Ltd. (Imara)from sources that it believes to be reliable, but no representation or warranty is made or guarantee given by Imara or any other person as to its accuracy orcompleteness. All opinions and estimates expressed in this report are (unless otherwise indicated) entirely those of Imara as of the date of this report onlyand are subject to change without notice. Neither Imara nor any other member of the Imara Group of companies including their respective associatedcompanies (together Group Companies), nor any other person, accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this reportor its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. Each recipient of this report shall be solely responsible for making its own independentinvestigation of the business, financial condition and prospects of companies referred to in this report. Group Companies and their respective affiliates,officers, directors and employees, including persons involved in the preparation or issuance of this report may, from time to time (i) have positions in, andbuy or sell, the securities of companies referred to in this report (or in related investments); (ii) have a consulting, investment banking or brokingrelationship with a company referred to in this report; and (iii) to the extent permitted under applicable law, have acted upon or used the informationcontained or referred to in this report including effecting transactions for their own account in an investment (or related investment) in respect of anycompany referred to in this report, prior to or immediately following its publication. This report may not have been distributed to all recipients at thesame time. This report is issued only for the information of and may only be distributed to professional investors (or, in the case of the United States,major US institutional investors as defined in Rule 15a-6 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and dealers in securities and must not be copied,published or reproduced or redistributed (in whole or in part) by any recipient for any purpose.

    Imara Edwards Securities 2014

    13