16
1 WP3 – Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016

WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

1

WP3 – Monitoring, integrationand evaluation of impacts

Sebastien Fiette, CEA@CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016

Page 2: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

2 WP4 Objectives and tasks

• Measure, analyse the benefits of the use of Fuel Cell Buses• Technology perspective,• Taking into account environmental, economic, social

aspects• Socio-economic assessment

• determining the life cycle cost• Environmental impact

• Benchmark evaluation with other bus technologies

WP4 Monitoring, integration and Evaluation of impacts

Partners

Task 4.1 Evaluation plan CEA

Task 4.2 HRS and FCB evaluation assessment CEA

Task 4.3 Non-technological evaluationassessment

VanHool, LAZIO, PZH, DE LIJN, LBSL,RET, CUC

Page 3: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

3 Task 4.1 Evaluation Plan

Evaluation plan status

- First proposal has been sent to partners in January 2016- Significant remarks / feedback from Van Hool :

- Main changes made on variables to be recorded in the bus, with less critical / confidential data and less details

- Little evolution on logbooks aspects

- New version to be sent before the end of June

Page 4: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

4 Evaluation Plan – Document Structure

Evaluation Plan part 1 : defining / agreeing on the high level KPIs

Merge of several lists and tables present in the Description of Work

Defining target values if relevant

Definition of groups of KPIs

Evaluation Plan part 2 - definition of data to be collected :

Datalogging / Forms / Log books / Surveys

Definition of frequencies of data collection

Definition of partners responsibilities

Evaluation Plan part 3 - detailed formulas and methodology to evaluate KPIs from collected data

For each KPI, definition of the required data

Page 5: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

5 Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Groups of KPIs Key Factor Indicators 3EMOTION target value

Bus reliability

Bus availability 90%

Safety incident reporting

Fuel Cell warranty >15.000h

Bus statistical analysis of failure

Bus durability 10 years

Buses KPIs

Page 6: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

6

Groups of KPIs Key Factor Indicators 3EMOTION target value

Bus efficiency

Bus fuel consumption / specific H2 consumption

8 kg H2/100km (10kg/100km for articulated buses) - 7 to 9kg H2

/100km

Impact of driving styleConsumption ranges from 6,9 to 9,2kg/100km depending on the

driver

Bus costs

Bus cost 850k€, 1250k€ for articulated buses

Cost for bus maintenance service

Annual cost for bus maintenance

Annual cost for bus repair/failure

Buses KPIs

Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Page 7: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

7

Groups of KPIs Key Factor Indicators 3EMOTION target value

Heavy duty city bus usage

Frequency of stops >2/km

Urban bus duty cycle / bus operational time

12 to 20 hours/day / 12h/day and 6 days per week

Commercial speed between 12 and 16km/h

Bus fuel fills 2 fills/day1 fill/day

Full option comfort60 to 50% for traction ; 40 to 50% for auxiliaries - For 12m buses :

1,1kW.h/km for traction and 0,5kW.h/km for auxiliaries

Buses KPIs

Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Page 8: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

8

Groups of KPIs Key Factor Indicators 3EMOTION target value

Bus performance / specifications

Driving range >300km without refuelling

Acceleration 25m in 8s ; 200m in 30s

Greadability 14% fully loaded

Maximum speed

Drivetrain power density

Ambient temperature -20°C to +40°C

Maximum H2 storage capacity

Energy density of the H2 storage

Gas pressure 350bar

Buses - number of passengers

Buses KPIs

Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Page 9: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

9

Groups of KPIs Key Factor Indicators 3EMOTION target value

Extent of the experimentTotal travelled distance

H2 refuelled and consumed

Customers surveysCustomer satisfaction

Approval and operational hurdles of the vehicle

Buses KPIs

Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Page 10: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

10

HRS KPIs

Evaluation Plan : KPIs

Groups of KPIs

Refuelling station losses

Refuelling station reliability

Refuelling station costs

Extent of the experiment

Refuelling station performances / specs

Customers surveys

H2 production KPIs

Groups of KPIs

Production unit reliability

Efficiency

CostsExtent of the experiment

Same approach for infrastructure

Page 11: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

11 Evaluation Plan : Data collection

Contract items Unit/choices

Fuel cell warranty h

Bus price €

Maintenance service subscription price €

Personal cost €/h

Repairing service contract price €

Hydrogen price €/kg or €/bar

Bus number of seats -

Bus number of possible standing passengers -

Bus maximum number of passengers -

Bus number of wheelchairs places -Ability to transport bikes Yes/no

Initial Form

To be filled by bus operators

Help from bus manufacturer for technical points

Performance items Unit/choicesAction range km

Time to cover 25m from start sTime to cover 200m from start s

Announced greadeabilitycapacities %

Maximal speed Km/hMaximal power of drivetrain kW

Mass of the drivetrain kgOperational temperature

range °C

Technical items Unit/choicesMax tank pressure bar

Minimal tank pressure bar

Maximal tank temperature °C

Tank volume lMass of the drivetrain

components kg

Power of the drivetrain kW

Page 12: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

12 Evaluation Plan : Data collection

Requested data Unit/choiceFuel cell cumulated running hours hour

Fuel cumulated number of start&stops -

Cumulated running hours hourCumulated kilometers kmMinimum battery SOC %Maximum battery SOC %

Distance made by the bus kmH2 consumption from on board tank kg

Average speed Km/hNumber of refills -

Distance made by the bus between two refuellings km

Distribution of distance made for different slope classes Km/%

Distribution of speed %/km/hTemperature distribution %/°C

Mass of H2 remaining in the tank before refueling kg

Variables computed from data logging

Generated by bus and fuel cell manufacturers

One value per day One value per month

Requested data Unit/choiceMinimum fuel cell SOH %Minimum battery SOH %

Page 13: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

13

Date

Vehicle in service Not in service

Route number

available AM available PM

Time spent in state n°1 : FCB in

service

Time spent in state n°2 : out of

service

Time spent in state n°3 : not

available

dd:mm:yyyy - Yes/no Yes/no h h h--> one line per day

Bus usage

Date Time at start of shift Time at end of shift Driver id

dd:mm:yyyy Hour:min Hour:min ---> one line per driver /shift

Shift / drivers

Log Books

Filled by bus operatorsExcel tables, with several sheetsOrWeb site from High VLO City ?

Evaluation Plan : Data collection

Page 14: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

14 HRS and FCB Monitoring

Date Reason of failureReason

description

Part concerned level of failure

cost of parts

personal hours spent

Total time out of

service

dd:mm:yyyy failure/maintenance/other free text

FC system/mechanical component/electrical

component/H2 storage/high voltage

Red/orange € h day

--> one line for each bus maintenance event

Log Books

Filled by bus operators

Maintenance

Date Event severity Event type Event type comment

dd:mm:yyyy Injury / no injury 1/2/…/6 free text

--> one line for each bus safety event

Safety events

Page 15: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

15 D4.2 Ex-Ante Analysis

Objectives• Describes the way the operators organise the public transport on the lines where the FC

Buses will be operated in the future.

• Provide the data against which the fuel cell buses are evaluated.

• Evaluate the performance of diesel vehicles on the lines.

• Estimation of the amount of noise, greenhouse gases, PM and energy that is consumed to have the dieselbuses operated.

Inputs from each site: • Description of the lines (with special attention for the differences in operations for the

different sites)

• Description of the fleet and its performance *daily/monthly/yearly mileage* Vehicles description (age / mileage / emissions standards / fuel consumption) * vehicle availability* maintenance and troubleshooting practise* relationships with suppliers

• Local expectations for FC Buses during operations

Page 16: WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts · WP3 Monitoring, integration and evaluation of impacts Sebastien Fiette, CEA @CM3 Rotterdam 22-23 June 2016. 2 WP4 Objectives

16 Deliverables WP4 – Time Plan

End of June 2016 :- Updated version of Evaluation Plan sent to partners

July 2016 :- Submission of Evaluation Plan- Sites contacted for inputs of Ex Ante Analysis (Cherbourg, London, Rotterdam and Rome)

September 2016 :- Ex Ante analysis sent to partners for review

October 2016 :- Ex Ante Analysis submission