Upload
nick-jankowski
View
324
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Publishing in Academic Journals Procedures & Practices
Nicholas W. Jankowski
Visiting FellowVirtual Knowledge Studio for the Humanities and Social Sciences (VKS)Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and SciencesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Co-editor, New Media & Society
Workshop: Scientific PublishingCORE Doctoral School of Communication Studies, FinlandUniversity of Tampere
Thursday, 11 November 2010, 9.00-12.00
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 1
Overview
• Prelimaries– Editorial background– Publishing routes
• Selecting a journal– considerations– Measures of Impact– Resources
• Iowa Guide• Iowa Online Resources
• Manuscript – submission– Processing procedures– Reviews & correspondence – Preparing for publication
• In conclusion– Editorial preferences– Summary: FAQs– Micellania– Journals new media
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 2
Preliminaries
• Workshop: informal– important: interrupt with questions at any time
• Materials– Article: Daft (1995), “Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected….”– Workshop document: Publishing in Academic Journals– SAGE Journals Online– Issue New Media & Society
• Agenda (09.00-12.00)– Presentation: ca. 45 min. (with interruptions)– Discussion re presentation materials: ca. 15 min.– Break: ca. 15 min.– Small group activities: ca. 45 min.– Plenary reports from small groups: ca. 45 min.– Wrap-up: ca. 15 min.
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 3
Preliminaries: Editorial Background
• book editor– small publishers: Quintessenz Verlag, Cramwinckel, Libbey– major communication publishing houses: Hampton, Routledge, SAGE
• journal editor– Communications: European Journal of Communication Research– New Media & Society
• book series editor– Euricom Monographs: Communicative Innovations and Democracy
(Hampton Press)
• guest editor of journal theme issues– Javnost, EJCR, JCMC, EJC, IP
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 4
Preliminaries: Publishing Routes
Dissertation-Related Publications
Ph.D. dissertation (chapter)
Conference paper Other publications
*essaysJournal article * book reviews
* review essays*research-in-brief
Book chapter
Scholarly monograph
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 5
Selecting a Journal: Considerations 1
• language– minority languages– national focus– International orientation
• distribution– regional– international
• form of publication– print only– online only– hybrid: online & print
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 6
Selecting a Journal: Considerations 2
• reviewing procedure– double blind, peer review
• abstracting & indexing services– Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Web of Science– others: Web of Knowledge, Communication Abstracts, Social SciSearch
• status of journal– discipline / peers & colleagues– department / institution– Impact Factor, H-index, Publish or Perish
• other issues– career advancement– intended audience– point of entry (close to home)– academic status: international, ISI ranked, impact factor, English language, peer
reviewed11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 7
Selecting a Journal: Measures of Impact 1
• ISI Impact Factor: Definition– Cites to Articles in current year / Articles published in past 2
years (revision: past 5 years)
• Applications– Authors: journal status; prestige– Libraries: journal comparative assessment – Institutions: staff assessment– National assessment exercises
• Alternatives
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 8
Selecting a Journal: limitations to ISI
• Inclusion in database• North American bias• English bias• ‘blind’ application during assessments• Fluctuations in factor across time
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 9
Selecting a Journal: Impact Alternatives
• Publish or Perish• Hirsch index (H-index)
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 10
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 12
Manuscript: submission
• initial query– meeting editor– letter– draft of manuscript (ms)
• formal submission– online / email (no longer via conventional postal service)– cover letter– single electronic copy
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 13
Manuscript: Processing Procedures 1
• submission, (NM&S)– internal assessment (1-2 weeks)– external reviews (3-8 weeks)
• letter to author after review– ‘reject’, (decline to consider for publication)– ‘revise & resubmit’ (with external review by same reviewers)– accept for publication
• revision of ms (max. 12 weeks)
• assessment of revised ms (2-6 weeks)– internal assessment (2 weeks)– external assessment (4 weeks)
• letter to author: decision to publish– request to submit final version– NM&S ms final checklist
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 14
Manuscript: Processing Procedures 2
• ms prepared for ‘banking’– final check by assistant to editor– copyright release form– ms sent to SAGE London
• publication in SAGE OnlineFirst
• ms selected for inclusion in print issue– special treatment– order– publicity
• Time durations: submission to publication– from submission to decision to publish: 6-12 mo.– From decision to SAGE OnlineFirst: ca. 6 mo.– From OnlineFirst to printed issue: ca. 4-6 mo.
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 15
Manuscript: Reviews & Correspondence
• Editorial decision options– accept (with minor revisions)– revise & resubmit– reject
• Reacting to reviews– important: content of cover letter accompanying revised ms
• Revising ms
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 16
Manuscript: Preparing for publication
• final check of ms– by author– by NM&S editors
• correction of page proofs– by author– global check by NM&S editor
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 17
Manuscript: NM&S Decision Tree
Internal Assessment Submission
Reject / unsuitable Suitable for review
1st review 2nd review 3rd review
Editor assessment
Rejection R&R mixed assessment / acceptance
Submission to NM&S Co-editors
Rejection R&R Acceptance
Rejection 2nd external review Acceptance
Final internal assessment
Rejection acceptance
Final version msFinal editor checkCopyright release formBanking ms SageSelection ms issueSage copyediting msProof pages Publication
In Conclusion: Editorial Preferences
• likes– clear organization & presentation– theoretical models / formulations– empirical basis for statements– proposals for further (empirical) study
• dislikes– informal conversational letters– incomplete referencing (in-text & bibliographies)– grammatical errors & non-academic stylistic
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 19
In Conclusion: 18 FAQs (unordered)
1 How long does the review process take?
2 How much time may elapse between submission and publication?
3 What recourse is available when an author doesn’t agree with the reviewer’s comments?
4 What to do when no word from journal editor (for
what seems like a very long time)?
5 What alternatives are available to speed up publication process?
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 20
FAQs (continued)
6 Can I submit my ms to more than one journal?
7 Does it help to co-author an article with a senior scholar or mentor?
8 Can I place my published article on my or another website?
9 Can I submit a translated version of my article to NM&S that has already been published in a minority language (e.g., Finnish, Dutch) journal?
10 Who retains copyright of journal articles?
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 21
FAQs (continued)
11 Do online journals have the same status as print journals?
12 Who has the final say: the positive reviewers or the reserved editor?
13 How are articles selected for a particular issue of NM&S?
14 What happens when the NM&S editors disagree on the quality of a ms?
15 Does NM&S have a preference for particular theoretical perspectives or methodological approaches?
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 22
FAQs (continued)
16 How important is the Impact Factor of a journal in deciding whether to submit?
17 What is the status of NM&S as compared to other journals concerned with ICTs?
18 Once my article is published, is there anything else I should do?
Other issues– Copyright– Multimedia, dynamic visualizations, color– Supplementary materials (e.g., data, instruments, analyzes)– Social media (social networks, blogs, discussion sites)
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 23
In Conclusion: Miscellania
• University of Iowa, online communication studies resources
• APA Style • Chicago Manual of Style• Ohio State University site on Chicago Manual; on APA Citation Guide• Purdue Online Writing Lab. Materials related to APA Style
• Kitchin, R., & Fuller, D. (2005). The academic’s guide to publishing. London: Sage Publications. (Google Books version)• University of Toronto, Books on writing for graduate students• Capital Community College, Guide to grammar & writing
• Procedures: Review of International Economics• How to Publish in Top Journals
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 24
In Conclusion: New Media / Internet Studies Journals(small & personal selection)
• New Media & Society• J. of Computer/Mediated Communication • Information, Communication & Society• First Monday• Convergence• Policy & Internet• Intern’l J. of Internet Science• J. of Information Technology & Politics• TV & New Media
• Social Science Computer Review• The Information Society• New Media & Culture• M/C Journal
• J. of Public Deliberation• Information Polity• International J. of Communication• Javnost / The Public• Electronic J. of Communication
• Directories of (online) journals – New Jour– Directory of Open Access Journals– Serials in Cyberspace
11 November 2010 CORE Workshop: Scientific Publishing 25