Upload
victoria-shelton
View
232
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Outcome for the Targets Group
“A prioritised list of the under represented groups to be targeted by the Widening Participation Regional Strategy together with a range of time related goals for participation rates for each group.”
Considerations and work of the group to date have included:
Statistical analysis of HE participation in Northern Ireland
Specific areas explored to date have included:• Socio-economic classification• Deprivation• Religion• Ethnicity• Age• Disability• Geographical location of HE participation
Considerations and work of the group to date have included:
Rationale for targeting WP resources and activity needs to consider:
• Targeting resources for maximum impact
• Focussing on those groups where there are low rates of HE participation
• How WP activities can best work together to support HE learner progression
• Developing the monitoring and data capacity to support the regional WP framework.
Emerging Questions and Issues Are there missing target groupings from the areas
listed? How specified do the target groupings need to be for
operational purposes? How important is it to frame any final numerical targets
against, for example, changing demographics and changes in HE?
What other factors or issues should the group consider in its future work?
How might success be measured?
Key Barriers to Attainment & Aspirations
DISPOSITIONAL
INSTITUTIONAL
FINANCIAL
OTHER
INFORMATIONAL
SITUATIONAL
BARRIERS
Institutional
Situational Barriers Poor Levels of Attainment
Literacy/Numeracy difficulties
Peer pressure and cultural norms
Reluctance to leave geographical and other ‘comfort zones’
Physical access – rural access /public transport infrastructure
Challenges for Adult Returners (Family responsibilities, working patterns, lack of time, benefit entitlement)
Dispositional Barriers Low self-esteem
Lack of confidence, motivation & fear of failure
Poor past educational experiences
Resistance to learning
No tangible rewards
Alienation from family
Unstable home circumstances
Outdated perceptions of the educational sector
Attitudes related to social class or gender roles
Lack of suitable role models.
Institutional Barriers Lack of articulated
progression routes
Irrelevant/inflexible curriculum
Mode of provision
Inflexible entrance requirements
Meritocratic application and admissions systems
Intimidating facilities/buildings
Stigmatisation
Informational Barriers
Poor access to high quality careers education provision
Poor quality pre-entry information, advice and guidance
Lack of awareness of benefits of further and higher education
Lack of access to prospectus material due to low levels of literacy & numeracy
Financial Barriers Costs – direct, indirect
(transport and child-care)
Opportunity costs of forgone income
Debt aversion – need to develop financial literacy
Limited discretionary grants
Other Barriers
Lack of awareness of the needs of targeted groups
Integrated multi-agency approach
Employer support
Key Question
What could help learners overcome these barriers in order to achieve their full potential and consider the relevant progression opportunities?
Moving Forward
Early InterventionHigh Quality Teaching & LearningRelevant & Affirming CurriculumStructured Learning Support Linking with Key Partners
Raising ExpectationsBroadening HorizonsLevel of AchievementClear Progression PathwaysInformation, Advice & Guidance
ATTAINMENT
ASPIRATION
Two Guiding PrinciplesWidening Participation is not about lowering standards
Higher Education provision Northern Ireland covers University, University College and Regional Colleges
Focus of GroupEvaluating Methods of Recruitment
Evaluating Methods of Selection
Identifying Parameters for Enhancement
Measuring Impact
CONTEXT - Infrastructure Swartz Report (2004) National Student Forum (2008) IUSS Select Committee Report - Students and
Universities (2009) Unleashing Aspirations: Report on Fair Access to the
Professions (2009) Role of Supporting Professionalism in Admissions
(SPA)
CONTEXT – Regional
Is there a problem?
If so, where does it lie?
Solutions need to be target-focussed
Solutions need to be measurable
Identifying Targets
Overlap Work of Targets Group
Assumption: SECs 5-7Male Protestant Youth
Disability
Adult Returners
Work-based Learners
Enhancing Recruitment
Raising Aspirations – Targeted ActivitiesQueen’s - Discovering Queen’s
University of Ulster - Step Up
Realising Opportunities Project – HEFCE-funded13 research intensive universities
Compact Schemes
Texas 10%
Role of careers, information advice and guidance
Enhancing SelectionAre there qualifications barriers?
• Statistical evidence e.g. 14.7% progress to HE from Secondary
Schools
74.2% progress to HE from Grammar Schools
How are these to be addressed?• Adjustment period• Contextual Data• Selection using non-cognitive processes (SATs mini interviews)• Vocational Qualifications• Qualifications and Credit Framework• APEL
Issues or Questions
1. Widening Participation is not about lowering standards of entry. What are the barriers for more inclusive recruitment and selection for target groups?
2. Are there interventions at stages not being optimized?a) Primary
b) Post-Primary
c) Post-16
d) Adult Learning
e) Work-based learning
3. What should the role of employers be in supporting training and education opportunities for progression to HE?
Issues or Questions (continued)4. Is there a shared view that contextual data should be adopted in the
areas of:• Hard data supplied by DEL/DE• Soft data in applications
How does this relate to Section 75?
5. Should alternative access routes to HE be enhanced?• Access programmes• New routes for disengaged youth (NEET)• Foundation Degrees• Other
6. Should quotas be set for participation levels in HE (as in the Republic of Ireland)?
Membership of Group Suzanne Gray Belfast Metropolitan College Heather Laird Open University Joan McCombe St Mary’s University College Dorothy Mclwee North-West Regional College Dr Damian O’Kane University of Ulster Professor Colin Trotman DACE, Swansea University Paul Walsh South-Eastern Regional
College
DEL: Kieran Mannion; Peter Martin; Thomas Coyle
Terms of Reference To identify those groups who are least likely to be retained,
progress and achieve Higher Education qualifications
To identify the possible barriers to completion among the target groups
To identify ways in which the target groups can be supported to successfully complete Higher Education programmes
To provide guidance on a regional approach to the improvement of retention, progression and completion among the target groups
To identify those groups who are least likely to be retained, progress and achieve Higher Education qualifications
Lower Socio-Economic Class (SEC)
Gender - Males
Disability - Likelihood increases with year of course
Age - Adult Learners
Religion – Catholics
Are there other groups/sub-groups that we should be considering?
To identify the possible barriers to completion among the target groups (Personal, Social, Academic interaction)
Financial
Parental Education
Subject Studied – STEM Subjects higher drop-out
Qualification on Entry – Misalignment of teaching strategies
Pre-Entry preparation – inadequate info, Interest in subject
Post Entry Support – Social and Academic Integration
What barriers are there to completion among the target groups?
To identify ways in which the target groups can be supported to successfully complete Higher Education programmes
What can Government do? Policies
Target Setting
Funding
What can HE/FE Institutions do?
Academic & Pastoral Support
What can other stakeholders do?
Schools
Careers Service
Community Organisations
How do we improve retention and progression among the target groups?
Post Entry Support – Social and Academic Integra
Specific Issues for Consultation
(1) Are there other groups/sub-groups that we should be considering?
(2) What barriers are there to completion among the target groups?
(3) How do we improve retention and progression among the target groups?
What can Government do?
What can HE/FE Institutions do?
What can other stakeholders do?