19
90 y o, 20 y after cataract surgery, 3 y after suturing of left eye, 20/400 preop, 20/40 post op, removal retained lens material

Why reposition and suture instead of replace

  • Upload
    dori

  • View
    64

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

90 y o, 20 y after cataract surgery, 3 y after suturing of left eye, 20/400 preop, 20/40 post op, removal retained lens material. Why reposition and suture instead of replace. Replacement with large one piece PMMA sclerally sutured IOL Requires large incision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

90 y o, 20 y after cataract surgery, 3 y after suturing of left eye, 20/400 preop, 20/40 post op, removal retained lens material

Page 2: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Replacement with large one piece PMMA sclerally sutured IOL» Requires large incision» Long healing time and visual recovery

– In older patients may be very significant time

Replacement with AC IOL» Longer healing time

Page 3: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 4: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

dislocation after complicated cataract surgery in patient with NAG s/p PI OU, 20/200 preop, 20/50 post op fixation, secondary BK,

20/40 after DSEK

Page 5: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

B, 70 y o Dsek 2007, lens sutured 2 years later, +cme

Page 6: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

reasener

Page 7: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 8: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 9: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 10: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 11: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Oval pupil corrected with iridoplasty

Page 12: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

After lens suturing and iridoplasty

Page 13: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Siepser knot

Page 14: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 15: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Why iridoplasty?

Better optics and less glare Less peripheral anterior Synecheia

» Less decrease in outflow Better tolerance of mild lens

decentration

Page 16: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Complications of repair

Retinal detachment Glaucoma

Corneal edema Cystoid macular edema

Recurrence of dislocations

Page 17: Why reposition and suture instead of replace
Page 18: Why reposition and suture instead of replace

Dislocated IOLs

A problem? YES When to treat:

» Prevention: larger capsulotomies,– Capsular tension rings?

» When lens causing symptoms or likely to sublux Surgical options With appropriate repair outcomes are excellent and recurrences

are rare The least invasive procedure is the best, iris suturing leads to

consistent excellent results

Page 19: Why reposition and suture instead of replace