WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ......WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WORKSESSION ROOM 140 PUBLIC SERVICES CENTER AUGUST 17, 2004 REVISED 8:30 a.m. (15 min.) 1. …

WASHINGTON COUNTYBOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

WORKSESSION

ROOM 140PUBLIC SERVICES CENTER

AUGUST 17, 2004

REVISED

8:30 a.m.(15 min.)

1. Board of Commissioners Communication

8:45 a.m.(20 min.)

2. Discussion of Formal Agenda Items

9:05 a.m.(20 min.)

3. SOLV Presentation§ Jack McGowan, Executive Director, SOLV

9:05 a.m.(15 min.)

4. Update on Park SDC for Bull Mountain Area§ Joanne Rice, Land Use and Transportation

Jail Inspection for Month of August:Commissioner Leeper

AGENDACLEAN WATER SERVICES

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Agenda Category: Consent

Agenda Title: ACQUIRE AN EASEMENT TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITYPRESERVATION AND STORM AND SURFACE WATERDRAINAGE

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (nmc)

SUMMARY (Attach Supporting Documents if Necessary)

The following easement is necessary to provide water quality preservation and storm and surfacewater drainage for a property in Clean Water Services' service district:

I. WATER QUALITY PRESERVATION AND STORM AND SURFACE WATERDRAINAGE

PROPERTY OWNER PROJECT AREA VALUE

Anthony E. Spiering Project No. 6085 25,866 sf -0-Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2003

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A

REQUESTED ACTION: Acquire an easement to provide water quality preservation and stormand surface water drainage to a property in Clean Water Services'service district.

Agenda Item No. 1.a.

Date: 8/17/04

Page 1 – RESOLUTION AND ORDERCLEAN WATER SERVICES2550 S.W. Hillsboro Highway

Hillsboro, Oregon 97123-9379Telephone (503) 681-3600 Fax (503) 681-3603

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CLEAN WATER SERVICES

In the Matter of Acquisition of an ) RESOLUTION AND ORDEREasement Needed for District Purposes. )

) NO._____________________

The above-entitled matter came before the Board of Directors of Clean Water Services

(Board) at its regular meeting of August 17, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that Clean Water Services (District) requires a certain easement to

provide for water quality preservation and storm and surface water drainage to a property in the

District’s service district; and

It appearing to the Board that ORS 451.550 (3) and (4) give the Board the power to acquire

easements determined to be necessary and proper in the exercise of District purposes; and

It appearing to the Board that District representatives have secured from the property owner

named in Exhibit A, a duly executed easement to provide water quality preservation and storm and

surface water drainage, which recites therein an appropriate amount of consideration for acquisition

of the easement; and

It appearing to the Board that said easement should be accepted and recorded, and the Board

being fully advised in the premises and that the grantor thereof should be compensated for the

easement granted thereby as provided in the easement document and as set forth in Exhibit A; it is

therefore

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Page 2 – RESOLUTION AND ORDERCLEAN WATER SERVICES2550 S.W. Hillsboro Highway

Hillsboro, Oregon 97123-9379Telephone (503) 681-3600 Fax (503) 681-3603

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the easement granted by the property owner named in

Exhibit A to this Resolution and Order be, and hereby is, accepted by the Board of Directors of the

District.

DATED this 17th day of August, 2004.

CLEAN WATER SERVICESBy its Board of Directors

________________________________Chairman

________________________________Recording Secretary

EXHIBIT A

I. WATER QUALITY PRESERVATION AND STORM AND SURFACE WATERDRAINAGE

PROPERTY OWNER PROJECT AREA VALUE

Anthony E. Spiering Project No. 6085 25,866 sf -0-Revocable Trust dated June 4, 2003


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Agenda Title:

APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH COMCAST OF TUALATINVALLEY, INC. TO UTILIZE THE METROPOLITAN AREANETWORK

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (ms)


Comcast of Tualatin Valley, Inc. (Comcast) provides a Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) basedon fiber-optic technology. Clean Water Services (District) satisfactorily utilized Comcast’sservices for the past several years for data communication between District sites. This contractrenewal allows the District to continue to achieve high-speed, reliable communications on itsdistributed computing environment for significantly less than if it were to utilize traditionaltelephone company services. Therefore, the District pays less for more bandwidth. Most of theDistrict’s sites operate at one gigabyte of bandwidth for an average monthly charge of $745 persite.

The District requests its Board of Directors to approve a one-year agreement with Comcast in theamount of $59,502.53, so that the District can utilize the MAN for its data communications. Thisamount is reduced from last year's amount because of the consolidation that occurred with themove into the new Administration Building. The cost of these services, as reflected in theproposed contract renewal, are established by the Metropolitan Communications Network andreflect no appreciable change from the current year.FISCAL IMPACT: $59,502.53

Budget Information: 040.8305.0000.52440

REQUESTED ACTION: Approve a one-year agreement with Comcast of Tualatin Valley,Inc. in the amount of $59,502.53 to utilize the Metropolitan AreaNetwork for the District’s data communications.

(A copy of the Agreement is available at the Clerk’s desk.)

Agenda Item No. 1.b.

Date: 8/17/04

Page 2


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Agenda Category: Consent CPO 7

Agenda Title:

AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE WILLOW CREEK WATERQUALITY AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT (4886) TO THE LOWESTRESPONSIBLE BIDDER

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (dg)


The Willow Creek Water Quality and Enhancement Project (4886) consists of providing labor,materials and equipment for the installation of 183 lineal feet of 30-inch diameter PVC storm sewermain, 76 lineal feet of 15-inch PVC storm sewer pipe, one water quality diverter manhole structure,installation of a water quality treatment swale, and 3.25 acres of wetland/buffer enhancement planting.

The Engineer’s Estimate for the project is $136,822.35. Bids for construction of the project will bereceived and opened on Thursday, August 12, 2004. Staff will report the company names, bidamounts for the three lowest bids, and provide an award recommendation as soon as possible after bidopening.

The project is funded with available funds from the SWM Construction Fund 212.

FISCAL IMPACT: To be determinedBudget Information: 212.062.8224.52205 (Project 4886)

REQUESTED ACTION: Award the contract for construction of the Willow Creek WaterQuality and Enhancement Project to the lowest responsiblebidder.

Agenda Item No. 1.c.Date: 8/17/04


BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Agenda Title: APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF FLOW MONITORING EQUIPMENT

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (ds)


Clean Water Services (District) utilizes electronic flow monitoring devices in its flow monitoringprogram to collect data from the sanitary and storm water collection systems. This data is used by theDistrict to identify ground water infiltration and inflow, allowing District to better allocate repair andmaintenance resources. The information is also used to project collection system needs such as pipeupgrades and plant expansions.

Staff has researched options to replace existing monitoring equipment that is obsolete and no longerserviceable, and has found only one manufacturer who offers a suitable replacement. BainbridgeAssociates, Inc. (Bainbridge) is the only company at this time who offers “FLO-DAR,” a fully non-contact flow meter. This technology eliminates the hazards of staff physically entering live confinedspace stream flows to place and maintain equipment. It also provides longer equipment life since themeter sensors do not come in contact with the stream flow. Staff currently operates other monitoringequipment sold by Bainbridge that has performed well. Purchasing additional Bainbridge units wouldallow staff to standardize software data formats and provide additional cost savings.

(CONTINUED)

FISCAL IMPACT: $106,500Budget Information: 106.0.0.52340 (Project 6194)

REQUESTED ACTION Waive the competitive purchasing requirements and authorizethe General Manager to sign a contract with BainbridgeAssociates, Inc. in the amount of $106,500 for thepurchase of flow monitoring equipment.

Agenda Item No. 1.d.Date: 8/17/04

Page 2

Under purchasing rule 125-340-020, the Board may waive the competitive purchasing requirements ifthere is only one manufacturer or seller of the product of the quality required. Because of theadvantages noted above, District is requesting that the Board waive the competitive purchasingrequirements for this purchase. The purchase is not likely to encourage favoritism in public contracts orsubstantially diminish competition, and will result in cost savings to the District.

Staff recommends that a contract be signed with Bainbridge for the purchase price of $106,500.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Agenda Category: Consent (CPO 9, 12F)

Agenda Title:

AWARD OF CONTRACTS FOR ROCK CREEK DIGESTER ANDFOREST GROVE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ROOFREPLACEMENT PROJECTS TO SNYDER ROOFING AND BOBCARLSON, INC.

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (hb)


Clean Water Services' (District) needs to the replace the roofs on the Rock Creek Digester andForest Grove Administration Buildings (Projects). The work will include removing existingroofing materials and installing new roofs. At the Forest Grove Facility, the contractor will alsorepair a porch. The District solicited separate lump sum bids for each of the Projects. The Districtreceived and opened the following bids on July 28, 2004:

Contractor Bid for Roof Replacement on Rock Creek Digester BuildingBob Carlson, Inc. $110,967Snyder Roofing $123,568

Contractor Bid for Roof Replacement on Forest Grove Admin BuildingSnyder Roofing $101,460Bob Carlson, Inc. $113,622

Engineer's Estimate for the Projects $200,000 (CONTINUED)

FISCAL IMPACT: $212,427.00 (for both Projects)Budget Information: 106 (Project 6131)

REQUESTED ACTION: Award the contract for the Roof Replacement on the Rock CreekDigester Building to Bob Carlson, Inc. in the amount of $110,967and award the contract for the Roof Replacement on the ForestGrove Administration Building to Snyder Roofing in the amount of$101,460.

Agenda Item No. 1.e.

Date: 8/17/04

Page 2

The District recommends awarding the contract for the roof replacement on the Rock CreekDigester Building to Bob Carlson, Inc., the lowest responsive bidder. Bob Carlson, Inc. did notdisclose any subcontractors for this project.

District recommends awarding the contract for the roof replacement at the Forest GroveAdministration Building to Snyder Roofing (Snyder), the lowest responsive bidder. Snyderdisclosed IT&L sheet metal and Karl Construction as sub-contractors.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Agenda Category: Consent CPO 8

Agenda Title:

QUITCLAIM A PERMANENT STORM AND SURFACE WATERDRAINAGE EASEMENT TO ANTHONY SPIERING (FOR TAXLOT 1N31200102)

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (nmc)


Anthony Spiering, the property owner of Tax Lot 1N31200102, has requested that Clean WaterServices (District) release a permanent water quality preservation and storm and surface waterdrainage easement over his property. The easement was granted by Document 2002-096162 andincludes restrictions on excavation and paving that interfere with vehicular access to an existingstructure.

The quitclaim is being requested in conjunction with the granting of a new Water QualityPreservation and Storm and Surface Water Drainage easement by Mr. Spiering to the District thatdoes not interfere with access to the existing structure on the property. District staff has reviewedand approves the quitclaim of the water quality preservation and storm and surface water drainageeasement to Mr. Spiering.

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A

REQUESTED ACTION: Quitclaim the above-described easement to Anthony Spiering.

Agenda Item No. 1.f.

Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA

WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation (CPO 4M)

Agenda Title: APPROVE AMENDMENT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERINGSERVICES FOR THE HIGHWAY 99W/SW HALL BOULEVARDINTERSECTION PROJECT

Presented by: Dan Brown, Capital Project Management Manager


The Highway 99W/SW Hall Boulevard Intersection project is part of the Washington CountyMajor Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP 3).

This project will reconstruct the Highway 99W/SW Hall Boulevard intersection to improve safetyand capacity. The work scope includes development and evaluation of alternatives, and selectionof a recommended alternative prior to the start of engineering design.

On September 3, 2002, by MO #02-309, the Board approved a Multi-Year Professional ServicesAgreement for roadway engineering services with W&H Pacific, Inc. and authorized the CountyAdministrator to sign amendments for services on a specific project with fees not to exceed$150,000. Amendments for work in excess of $150,000 require Board approval.

(continued)

Attachment: Vicinity Map

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:

Approve Amendment 5.0 with W&H Pacific, Inc., for $250,000 and authorize its execution uponcompletion of the County’s contract review process.

cpm\shared\projects\2523 99w hall boulevard intersection\agendaamnd5.0whp.doc 7/28/04

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S RECOMMENDATION:

I concur with the requested action.

Agenda Item No. 1.g.Date: 8/17/04

APPROVE AMENDMENT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THEHIGHWAY 99W/SW HALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION PROJECTBCC 8/17/04

W&H Pacific, Inc. is the consultant selected to perform preliminary design engineering services forthis project based on their experience on similar type projects and the resources available tocomplete the work in a timely manner, which are Board approved criteria for consultant selectionfor specific work.

Amendment 5.0 is for W&H Pacific, Inc. to perform preliminary design services for the project.Staff has negotiated the scope of services and cost to provide these services for a cost of $250,000.

The subconsultants anticipated to be involved with this project are Geodesign., Kittelson &Associates Inc., and TW Environmental.

Fiscal Impact:

Project Budget $ 4,875,942

Expenditures to August 17, 2004 $ < 16,497 >

This Amendment $ < 250,000 >

Balance Available $ 4,609,445

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation (CPO 8)

Agenda Title: SET PUBLIC HEARING TO NAME COUNTY ROAD NO. 3185(NW COLLINS ROAD)

Presented by: Kenneth Bauer, County Surveyor


In 1997, a road was constructed between NW Collins Road and NW Kay Road. The right-of-waywas dedicated to the public in Document Nos. 97065949, 97077511, 97094968, and 97094967.It is in the best interest of the general public and emergency service providers to name the road“NW Collins Road”.

Washington County Code requires a public hearing to name a public street.

Attachments: 1. Description and Map (Exhibit “A”)


Set October 5, 2004, at 10:00am in the Auditorium of the Washington County Public ServicesBuilding, Hillsboro, Oregon, at your regularly scheduled meeting as the time and place for apublic hearing on this matter and direct staff to provide the appropriate public notices.

\\WNUT\DATA\ENG\Shared\WPSHARE\Colleen\LiaisonFolders\agendas\8-17-04\SPHNWCollinsCR3185-081704.doc



Agenda Item No. 1.h.

Date: 8/17/04

IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON

In the Matter of the Renaming of )A Certain Public Road in the ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERUnincorporated Area of )Washington County, Oregon. ) NO.

This matter having come on regularly before the Board at its meeting of May 21, 2002;and

It appearing that, pursuant to Section 11.04.060 Washington County Code, the Boardinitiated proceedings to rename a certain public road in the unincorporated area of WashingtonCounty as described and depicted on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and by this referenceincorporated herein; and

It appearing to the Board that by its Minute Order No. 02-117, April 23, 2002, it dulyrequired the setting of a time and place of public hearing on said matter and required that notice ofsaid hearing be posted in at least two conspicuous places abutting said subject road and that noticeof said hearing be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the subject roadpursuant to the Washington County Code; and

It appearing to the Board that in accordance with said Resolution and Order, notice was dulygiven by posting and publishing and a public hearing was held on this matter on the 21st day ofMay, 2002, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock a.m., in the Auditorium of the Washington County PublicServices Building, Hillsboro, Oregon; and

It appearing to the Board that at said public hearing, the Board heard the matter and consideredobjections and testimony offered by all persons interested in the proposed renaming of said publicroad, and the Board having considered this matter found that the best interests of WashingtonCounty would be served by renaming that certain public road; it is therefore

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that it is in the best interest of Washington County and thepublic in general that said public road be renamed as identified in Exhibits "A" and "B", attachedhereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Department of Land Use and Transportation causenew street signs to be placed; and it is further

After Recording Return To:Surveyor's Office, Suite 350-15

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County Clerk of Washington County, Oregon, beand hereby is, authorized and directed to forward a copy of this Resolution and Order to theDepartment of Land Use and Transportation, the Department of Assessment and Taxation, and theCounty Surveyor; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the effective date of the changes shall be May 29, 2002.

Dated this 21st day of May, 2002.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSFOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON

CHAIR

RECORDING SECRETARY

Approved as to Form:

Loretta SkurdahlSenior Assistant County Counsel

Date:

MAB:KB:clS:\ENG\WPSHARE\Colleen\agendas\PubHrgs02Agendas\PHRenameOldHwy47052102doc.doc5/1/02

Page 2

Resolution and Order No. Renaming Certain Roads

1. Present Name: SW Old Highway 47 (also known as Tualatin ValleyHighway)

Description: That portion of SW Old Highway 47 in the SoutheastOne-quarter of Section 1 and the Northeast One-quarter of Section 12, T1S, R4W, W.M. and lyingbetween the westerly right-of-way line of StateHighway 47 and the center of Gales Creek.

(See Exhibit “B”, Page 1)

Background: Washington County and the Oregon Department ofTransportation have executed an AbandonmentResolution, which transferred a portion of OldHighway 47 to Washington County. The NewHighway 47 by-pass is open for traffic and now aportion of Old Highway 47 must be renamed, Theportion transferred and to be renamed is south ofForest Grove and lies between the westerly right-of-way of Highway 47 and the center of Gales Creek tothe north. The portion of Old Highway 47 lying northof Gales Creek and being within the limits of ForestGrove is named “B Street”. For public safety reasonsand to avoid confusing the general public, the portionof Old Highway 47 south of Gales Creek shall berenamed “SW B Street”.

Recommendation: SW “B” Street

EXHIBIT “A” PAGE 1

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation (CPO 7)

Agenda Title: APPROVE AMENDMENT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERINGSERVICES FOR THE NW CORNELL ROAD/NW 179TH AVENUETO NW BETHANY BOULEVARD PROJECT



The NW Cornell Road/NW 179th Avenue to NW Bethany Boulevard project is part of theWashington County Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program (MSTIP 3b).

This project will reconstruct NW Cornell Road between NW 179th Avenue and NW BethanyBoulevard. The project includes roadway widening from two to five lanes, sidewalks, bikelanes,illumination, and landscaping.

On September 3, 2002, by MO #02-309, the Board approved a Multi-Year Professional ServicesAgreement for roadway engineering services with W&H Pacific, Inc. and authorized the CountyAdministrator to sign amendments for services on a specific project with fees not to exceed$150,000. Amendments for work in excess of $150,000 require Board approval.

W&H Pacific, Inc. is the consultant selected to perform preliminary engineering design servicesfor this project based on their experience on similar type projects and the resources available tocomplete the work in a timely manner, which are Board approved criteria for consultant selectionfor specific work.

(continued)

Attachment: Vicinity Map


Approve Amendment 4.0 with W&H Pacific, Inc. for $550,000 and authorize its execution uponcompletion of the County’s contract review process.

cpm\shared\projects\100044 cornell rd - 179th-bethany blvd\agendaamnd4.0whp.doc 7/29/04



Agenda Item No. 1.i.Date: 8/17/04

APPROVE AMENDMENT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THENW CORNELL ROAD/NW 179TH AVENUE TO NW BETHANY BOULEVARD PROJECTBCC 8/17/04

Amendment 4.0 is for W&H Pacific, Inc. to perform preliminary engineering design services forthe project. Staff has negotiated the scope of services and cost to provide these services for a costof $550,000.

The subconsultants anticipated to be involved with this project are Geodesign, Angelo Eaton andAssociates, Jeanne Lawson and Associates, Kittelson & Associates Inc., and TW Environmental.

Fiscal Impact:

Project Budget $ 7,431,000

Expenditures to August 17, 2004 $ - 0 -

This Amendment $ < 550,000 >

Balance Available $ 6,881,000

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation (CPO 4B)

Agenda Title: APPROVE DECLARATION OF NECESSITY AND PROTECTIVERENT PAYMENTS FOR THE SIDE STREETS IMPACTED BYTHE WALNUT STREET/121S T TO 135TH AVENUES PROJECT



On April 6, 2004, the Board approved R & O #04-35, authorizing staff to acquire the necessaryright-of-way acquisition and protective rent payments for the Walnut Street/121st to 135th

Avenues project. Some of the side street centerline descriptions have changed slightly, so a newR & O has been prepared to reflect the current centerline descriptions on all side streets impacted.

In order to construct the improvements as designed, additional right-of-way and ancillaryeasements may be required. Right-of-Way acquisition for the project will follow Oregon StateDepartment of Transportation guidelines and policies adopted by the Board.

There may be opportunities to acquire right-of-way for the project, which may require protectiverent payments. Accordingly, the Board is requested to approve protective rent payments for thisproject as necessary, which has been done on other similar projects.

A new Resolution and Order has been prepared for the Board, which would allow the County toacquire the right-of-way and easements by condemnation, if necessary.

Attachment: Resolution and Order with Exhibits “A-1” & “A-2” Vicinity Map

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Approve the attached Resolution and Order authorizing the staff to acquire the necessary right-of-way acquisition and protective rent payment for the side streets impacted by the WalnutStreet/121st to 135th Avenues project.shared\row\002549 walnut (121st-135th)\2549-decnec8-17-04.doc 8/9/04



Agenda Item No. 1.j.

Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation CPO Beaverton

Agenda Title: SET PUBLIC HEARING TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION OFCERTAIN COUNTY ROADS TO THE CITY OF BEAVERTON

Presented by: Gregory S. Miller, County Engineer


The City of Beaverton by City Resolution No. 3762, requested the Transfer of Jurisdiction ofCertain County Roads from the County to the City of Beaverton. ORS 373.270 requires theCounty to hold a public hearing on this matter. Therefore, we ask the Board to set the date ofOctober 19, 2004 for the public hearing. ORS 373.270 requires public notification of thishearing.

Attachment: 1. Description “Exhibit A” 2. Map “Exhibit B”


Approve and set October 19, 2004, at 10:00am, in the Auditorium of the Washington CountyPublic Services Building, Hillsboro, Oregon, at your regularly scheduled meeting as the time andplace for a public hearing on the requested Transfer of Jurisdiction to the City of Beaverton (C.R.3189T/J). Direct that notification to the public be made by posting pursuant to ORS 373.270.

S:\Shared\WPSHARE\Colleen\LiaisonFolders\agendas\8-17-04\SPHTransJurisToBeaverton-081704.doc



Agenda Item No. 1.k.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Land Use and Transportation CPO 4M

Agenda Title: SET PUBLIC HEARING TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION OFCERTAIN COUNTY ROADS TO THE CITY OF TIGARD

Presented by: Gregory S. Miller, County Engineer


The City of Tigard by City Resolution No. 04-50, requested the Transfer of Jurisdiction ofCertain County Roads from the County to the City of Tigard. ORS 373.270 requires the Countyto hold a public hearing on this matter. Therefore, we ask the Board to set the date of October 19,2004 for the public hearing. ORS 373.270 requires public notification of this hearing.

Attachment: 1. Description “Exhibit A” 2. Map “Exhibit B”


Approve and set October 19, 2004, at 10:00am, in the Auditorium of the Washington CountyPublic Services Building, Hillsboro, Oregon, at your regularly scheduled meeting as the time andplace for a public hearing on the requested Transfer of Jurisdiction to the City of Tigard (C.R.3190T/J). Direct that notification to the public be made by posting pursuant to ORS 373.270.

S:\Shared\WPSHARE\Colleen\LiaisonFolders\agendas\8-17-04\SPHTransJurisToTigard-081704.doc



Agenda Item No. 1.l.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – County Counsel

Agenda Title: AUTHORIZE RELOCATION OF GRAVES IN RIGHT-OF-WAY

Presented by: Dan R. Olsen, County Counsel


Pursuant to ORS 97.220, your Board has authority to order the disinterment and relocation of theremains of deceased persons. Valley Memorial Park has requested that you do so as described inthe attached letter.

Valley Memorial states that the cemetery was dedicated in 1958 and plots were platted.Subsequently, a strip of land, including some empty cemetery plots, was dedicated to ODOT forright of way. Unfortunately, at some point the prior owner of the cemetery mistakenly buried 38individuals in this area. ODOT has requested that these be removed and the current owner hasworked on locating next of kin and obtaining permissions for some time.

The attached letter lists the remaining deceased persons. Most were indigent at the time of burial.Some had no apparent next of kin and in other cases the next of kin no longer can be found orhave not responded.

The new burials will occur nearby and are conducted so as to minimize any disturbance.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Authorize Valley Memorial Park to disinter and relocate the remains of those persons on theattached letter.



Agenda Item No. 1.m.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Office of Community Development

Agenda Title: APPROVE FAIR HOUSING PLAN REGARDING ANALYSIS OFFAIR HOUSING IMPEDIMENTS

Presented by: Peggy A. Scheer, Program Manager, Community Development BlockGrant Program (CDBG)


Since the county is a recipient of federal funds through the US Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment (HUD), we are required to comply with all federal laws, executive orders andregulations pertaining to fair housing and equal opportunity—including the furthering of fairhousing in our community. In order to certify that entitlement jurisdictions are furthering fairhousing, an analysis of impediments to fair housing must be conducted and the jurisdiction mustalso take appropriate action to overcome the effects of the impediments identified. It must alsomaintain records reflecting the analysis and related actions--hence the need for a fair housing planthat identifies these impediments and a plan for action to overcome them. The purpose of thisagenda item therefore, is to request that the Board approve the Fair Housing Plan.

The Office of Community Development contracted with Fisher, Sheehan & Colton in February2004 to prepare the Fair Housing Plan. During the plan development process, Dr. MichaelSheehan, the primary consultant, interviewed local and regional planners, advocates, housingindustry representatives, care providers, police, housing providers, fair housing regulators, andcounty housing officials. He also reviewed comprehensive planning documents as well as cityordinances to determine potential impacts on fair housing choice. The results of his research arereflected in the plan and are due at HUD on August 23, 2004. The plan is available at the Clerks’desk and is available for public review.

A 30-day public comment period on the document started on June 15th and ended on July 15th

with a public hearing held by the Policy Advisory Board. Hearing minutes and written testimonyare included in Appendix VI of the plan.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Adopt Washington County’s Fair Housing Plan for submittal to the US Department of Housingand Urban Development.



Agenda Item No. 1.n.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Health and Human Services

Agenda Title: APPROVE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THESTATE OF OREGON TO PROVIDE ALCOHOL AND DRUGSPECIALIST SERVICES

Presented by: Susan Irwin, Director


An Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Oregon, acting through the Department ofHuman Resources, Children, Adults and Families, continues funding for 1.5 FTE Alcohol andDrug Outreach Worker positions employed by LifeWorks NW. The staff works with clients toobtain substance abuse assessments and referrals to treatment.

The Department requests your Board approve the Intergovernmental Agreement in the amount upto $81,330 to fund those positions for the period of July 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.These funds were included in the County Request for Proposals process (#24030P) and awardedto LifeWorks NW.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:The Department requests your Board approve the Intergovernmental Agreement in the amount upto $81,330 for the period of July 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.



Agenda Item No. 1.o.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA



Agenda Title: APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE 2004-2005 CONTRACT WITHTHE ARC OF WASHINGTON COUNTY TO PROVIDESERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTALDISABILITIES



The State Department of Human Services has awarded funds for The Arc of Washington Countyin the amount of $20,128 to provide vocational services for one additional individual. YourBoard awarded the original contract with The Arc of Washington County in the amount of$77,733 on June 22, 2003 (MO #04-235). A competitive proposal process is not required as theservice provider is designated by the state. However, the increase of $20,128 exceeds 20 percentof the original contract amount and must be authorized by your Board.

The Department requests your Board approve an amendment to the 2004-2005 contract with TheArc of Washington County. The new contract total is $97,861.


The Department requests your Board approve an amendment to the 2004-2005 contract with TheArc of Washington County increasing funding by $20,128.



Agenda Item No. 1.p.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA



Agenda Title: APPROVE A RESOLUTION AND ORDER INCREASING THEDEPARTMENT APPROPRIATION BY $94,856 IN STATEHEALTH DIVISION FUNDS



State funding for Public Health services in Washington County is granted through anIntergovernmental Agreement with the Oregon Department of Human Services. This agreementfor fiscal year 2004-2005 was accepted by your Board on July 6, 2004, M.O. #04-266.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ budget was prepared estimating the amount ofthe grant. The Department requests approval of a Resolution and Order to adjust the 2004-2005budget to conform to the actual funding from the state. The budget adjustments are as follows:an increase of $4,048 for State Support of Public Health, $24,962 for Family Planning, $17,334for WIC, $157,518 for Child & Adolescent Health, $54,388 for Immunization Special Payments,$10,000 for School Based Clinics, $1,460 for TB Case Management, $73,765 for BioterrorismPreparedness, $2 for Health Alert Network and $7,000 for West Nile Virus Surveillance; areduction of $42,726 for Perinatal, $150,336 for Babies First, $26,966 for HIV Prevention,$35,000 for HIV Outreach and $593 for STARS. These adjustments result in a total increase of$94,856.

The attached Resolution and Order requests the addition of $94,856 to the Department budget.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Approve a Resolution and Order increasing the Department of Health and Human Services,Public Health Division, revenue and appropriations by $94,856 for fiscal year 2004-2005.



Agenda Item No. 1.q.Date: 8/17/04

Page 1 - RESOLUTION AND ORDER 114-8310

WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL155 N. FIRST AVE, SUITE 340 ~ MS #24

HILLSBORO, OR 97124PHONE (503) 846-8747 - FAX (503) 846-8636

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS


In the Matter of Adjusting the Budget for theDepartment of Health and Human ServicesOrganization Unit 7030 – Public Health

))))

RESOLUTION AND ORDER

No. ____________________

The above enti t led matter came before the Board at i ts meeting of August 17, 2004 and

I t appearing to the Board that funding from the State Health Division grant has been received for

public health programs; and

WHEREAS, the aforementioned funding from the State Health Division grant increases revenues

to Washington County Department of Health and Human Services by $94,856, i t is , therefore,

RESOLVED AND ORDERED tha t t he ap propriation and revenues for Organization Unit No.

7030 - Public Health are hereby increased by $94,856 for fiscal year 2004-2005; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the above ident i f ied revenues shal l be expended from August

17, 2004 through June 30, 2005, for the purpose of funding public health programs.

Dated this 17th day of August, 2004.

B O A R D O F C O U N T Y C O M M I S S I O N E R SF O R W A S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y

Chairman

Recording SecretaryApproved As To Form:/s/ Paul L. Hathaway, IIIAssistant County CounselDate: 8/4/2004

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Sheriff’s Office

Agenda Title: AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WITH STATEMARINE BOARD

Presented by: Rob Gordon, Sheriff


The Sheriff’s Office requests Board approval of the annual Oregon State Marine Board contract.The contract provides reimbursement to the Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement activities onHagg Lake.

The total amount of the FY04-05 contract is $96,983. The Marine Board portion is $63,904(reimbursed semi-annually per actual expenditures) and County match is $33,079, which will bepaid from existing appropriations. Funds offered under this agreement are used to reimburse theCounty for permanent and temporary marine salaries, boat maintenance and operating expenses,and miscellaneous supplies associated with the County’s Marine Patrol operations. Funds havebeen budgeted in the amount of $50,000 for this purpose.

The contract is available at the desk of the Clerk of the Board for review.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Approve the FY04-05 Marine Board contract as submitted and authorize execution of thecontract



Agenda Item No. 1.r.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Sheriff’s Office

Agenda Title: AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITYOF PORTLAND FOR RECEIPT OF URBAN AREA SECURITYINITIATIVE (UASI) GRANT EQUIPMENT

Presented by: Rob Gordon, Sheriff

SUMMARY (Attach Supporting Documents if Necessary)In conjunction with the county’s emergency management efforts conducted under the auspice ofthe Office of Consolidated Emergency Management (OCEM), the Sheriff’s Office requests Boardapproval of an intergovernmental agreement with the City of Portland.

The City of Portland has been designated grant administrator for the Urban Area SecurityInitiative (UASI) grant on behalf of the Oregon Urban Area that includes jurisdictions inMultnomah, Clackamas, Columbia and Washington Counties in Oregon and Clark County inWashington. The UASI grant originates from the US Department of Homeland Security, Officefor Domestic Preparedness. The purpose of the UASI grant initiative is to increase the capabilityof urban areas to prevent and respond to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosiveevents.

Under this grant (and via the proposed agreement with Portland), the Sheriff’s Office has beenawarded a LENCO Bear Citizen Rescue Vehicle worth approximately $274,000. The purpose ofthis vehicle is to transport operational personnel into, and citizen removal from, “hot-zones”. Itprovides mobile hard-cover against small-arms fire and projectiles; is a vehicle large enough toserve as a evacuation vehicle for endangered citizens as well as an insertion vehicle foroperational personnel in tactical situations.

Other items included in the grant award include approximately $113,000 for personal protectiveequipment for officers; communications equipment (radios); logistical support equipment andtraining funds. There are no matching funds required although some local implementationexpenditures (shipping, installation, maintenance, etc.) may be required and will be taken fromexisting Sheriff’s Office funds if needed.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Approve the proposed agreement with the City of Portland as submitted. It is available for reviewat the Clerk’s desk.



Agenda Item No. 1.s.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Support Services (CPO 12F)

Agenda Title: AUTHORIZING PRIVATE SALE OF COUNTY-OWNED PARCELDESCRIBED AS 1N436BA-05700

Presented by: Don Bohn, Sr. Deputy County Administrator


Washington County receives property through tax foreclosure, civil forfeiture, donation, andpurchase. On January 9, 1996, your Board approved Minute Order No. 96-15 that adoptedadditional property management guidelines allowing for the sale of the County’s land known as“slivers” to adjacent property owners at a price of not less than 20 percent of the assessed value.Consistent with the County 2000 Plan, this allows properties to be placed back on the tax rolls.Washington County has 35 parcels of this type. Oregon Revised Statute 275.225 authorizes thesale of property valued at less than $5,000, and deemed unbuildable, at private sale and requiresthat advertisement of the sale be made in a newspaper of general circulation.

County staff was contacted by Josh Bentley regarding a county-owned parcel of land described as1N436BA, Tax Lot 05700. Washington County received this parcel of land through the taxforeclosure process for nonpayment of back taxes. The parcel is located directly adjacent to theMr. Bentley’s property located at 1520 Thatcher Road in Forest Grove. The County-ownedparcel is approximately .07 acre in size (see attached map) and has a current assessed value of$1,520. The property is unbuildable and is of value only to the Mr. Bentley.

(Continued on Page 2)

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:1. Request that your Board declare County-owned property described as 1N436BA, Tax Lot

05700 surplus to the County’s needs.

2. Authorize the sale of the property described as 1N436BA, Tax Lot 05700, to Josh Bentley forthe purchase price of $304.

3. Direct staff to prepare a Quitclaim Deed and authorize the Board Chair, or his designee, toexecute the deed.



Agenda Item No. 1.t.Date: 8/17/04

Consent – Support ServicesAUTHORIZING PRIVATE SALE OF COUNTY-OWNED PARCEL DESCRIBED AS1N436BA-05700Page 2

Mr. Bentley has offered to purchase this parcel for $304. All adjacent property owners werecontacted to see if they had an interest in acquiring the property and Mr. Bentley is the onlyproperty owner that has expressed an interest in acquiring the parcel. Therefore, staff recommendsthe above-mentioned parcel be declared surplus to the County’s needs, and be sold to Josh Bentley for$304.

Staff will be available to answer any questions you may have.

Washington County GIS on the Web

Return to Geonet

Change Scale

Washington County Geographic Information Systems155 N First

Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124 (503)846-3553

www.co.washington.or.us

This map was derived from several databases. The County cannot accept reponsibility for any errors, omissions, or positional accuracy and therefore there are no warranties for this product. However, notification of errors would be appreciated.

Printed:8/4/2004 11:26:35 AM

Page 1 of 1Map Request

8/4/2004file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\jessicad\Local%20Settings\Temp\Map%20Reques...

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Department of Support Services

Agenda Title: AMEND THE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2004-2005 PAY PLAN FORCERTAIN CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF LANDUSE AND TRANSPORTATION

Presented by: Bob Osip, Human Resources Manager


The purpose of this agenda item is to request that your Board approve and establish salary rangesfor the new classification series of Engineering Project Manager I, Engineering Project Manager II,and Senior Engineering Project Manager in the Department of Land Use and Transportation.

This new series will replace the existing classifications of Engineering Project Coordinator andEngineering Project Manager, and is part of the Department of Land Use and Transportation’sreorganization of the Capital Project Division to increase efficiency and improve overall projectmanagement effectiveness. Historically, Capital Project Management’s work has been dividedamong internal divisions, separating project development and construction. Under the newstructure, projects are assigned between two teams that manage projects from inception tocompletion. This approach allows projects to move more efficiently through all phases of theproject development and management process.

Positions assigned to a classification within the Engineering Project Manager series will beresponsible for defining the work activities on assigned engineering project development andconstruction for capital improvement projects; planning, organizing, managing, implementing,evaluating and participating in assigned project(s) from inception to completion; monitoringperformance against project goals and objectives to ensure positive project results; investigatingfield problems and preparing project progress reports; and providing technical and projectcoordination and staff assistance to higher level management staff. (Continued on page 2).

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:That your Board approve the attached Resolution and Order establishing salary range 40 ($3,889-$4,726) for Engineering Project Manager I, salary range 44 ($4,293-$5,217) for EngineeringProject Manager II, and salary range 48 ($4,739-$5,759) for Senior Engineering Project Manager.



Agenda Item No. 1.u.Date: 8/17/04

Consent – Support ServicesAMEND 2004-2005 PAY PLAN

Page 2

The Human Resources Division completed a comprehensive classification and compensationreview of this proposed new classification series. The review consisted of: 1) an analysis of theproposed duties and responsibilities assigned to positions; 2) an assessment of proposed salary levelrelative to scope and complexity of work; and 3) a comparison of duties, responsibilities and pay ofthis classification series, to those of other related classifications.

The recommended salary ranges are range 40 ($3,889-$4,726) for Engineering Project Manager I,range 44 ($4,293-$5,217) for Engineering Project Manager II, and range 48 ($4,739-$5,759) forSenior Engineering Project Manager. The Project Manager I classification provides an “entry” levelat salary range 40 that does not currently exist. The salary range (44) for the new Project Manager IIclassification is the same as the current Engineering Project Coordinator classification, and thesalary range (48) for the new Senior Project Manager classification is the same salary range as thecurrent Engineering Program Manager classification. No additional staffing is requested orrecommended.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON

IN THE MATTER OF AMENDING THE ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERWASHINGTON COUNTY 2004-05 ) NO._____________________PAY PLAN )

The above-entitled matter came before the Board at its regular meeting of August 17,

2004; and

It appearing to the Board that Washington County Code Chapter 2.32, Appendix

I, known as the Washington County Civil Service Act and Section 15, directs that the

Board of County commissioners shall fix the compensation of all civil service positions

in the County; and

It appearing to the Board that the Washington County Position and Salary Report

sets forth all positions in the County, including compensation for such positions; and

It appearing to the Board that Washington County Department of Support

Services, Human Resources Division has reviewed the classifications of Engineering Project

Manager I, Engineering Project Manager II and Senior Engineering Project Manager; and

that appropriate compensation be provided for these classifications; more particularly of

salary range 40 ($3889-$4726) for Engineering Project Manager I, 44 ($4293-$5217) for

Engineering Project Manager II and 48 ($4739-$5759) for Senior Engineering

Project Manager; now therefore, it is

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the compensation be established at salary

range 40 ($3889-$4726) for Engineering Project Manager I, 44 ($4293-$5217) for Engineering

Project Manager II and 48 ($4739-$5759) for Senior Engineering Project Manager; and it is

further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Washington County Pay Plan, effective

August 17, 2004 be amended to reflect said adjustments.

DATED this 17th day of August 2004.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSFOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON

_______________________________________CHAIRMAN

_________________________________________RECORDING SECRETARY

APPROVED AS TO FORM

_________________________County Counsel

_________________________Date of Approval

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Consent – Service District for Lighting No. 1A County Service District (CPO 6)

Agenda Title: FORM ASSESSMENT AREA, AUTHORIZE MAXIMUM ANNUALASSESSMENT, AND IMPOSE A FIRST YEAR ASSESSMENTFOR ST. MARY’S WOODS APARTMENTS NO. 2

Presented by: David L. Schamp, Operations and Maintenance Division Manager


A petition (with waiver of hearing and remonstrances) requests street lighting service for theSt. Mary’s Woods Apartments No. 2

Number of Number Number of Number of Percent of SignaturesSignatures of Lots Street lights Property Owners Signatures Required 1 1 7 1 100% 51%

Attachments: 1. Resolution and Order2. Petition – Exhibit A3. Street lighting Proposal – Exhibit B4. Waiver and Continuing Request – Exhibit C5. Assessment Area Map – Exhibit D6. Vicinity Map

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:By Resolution and Order, (1) accept the petition(s), (2) form area as an assessment area withinthe Service District for Lighting, and (3) authorize maximum annual assessment and impose afirst year assessment.



Agenda Item No. 1.v.Date: 8/17/04

Page 1 – RESOLUTION AND ORDER R&O 2000 Creation & Assessment 100% Waiver\4-2000\de

WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL155 N. FIRST AVE, SUITE 340


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

IN THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT

FOR LIGHTING (No. SDL-1)

In the Matter of Creating an Assessment Area, )Ordering Installation, Operation and Maintenance ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERof Street Lighting Facilities; Establishing a )Maximum Annual Assessment and Imposing a First ) NO. Year Assessment for St. Mary’s Woods Apartments )

This matter having come before the Board of Directors of the Service District For

Lighting No.1, a county service district, at its meeting of August 17, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that 100% of the property owners in the proposed assessment

area described in Exhibit A, known as the St. Mary’s Woods Apartments development, have

requested by petition that their property be included in an assessment area for purposes of

installing, operating and maintaining street lighting facilities and that said facilities be financed

by special assessments on their property; and

It appearing to the Board that 100% of the property owners voluntarily have waived their

right to notice, hearing remonstrance and referendum, and consent to assessment as set forth

herein; and

It appearing to the Board that the street lighting facilities described in Exhibit B, will be a

special benefit to the properties and that the assessment method and amounts represent a

reasonably fair and equitable manner for apportioning costs in relation to benefit; now, therefore

it is

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the assessment area described in Exhibit A hereby is

established, and, that the facilities described in Exhibit B, shall be installed, operated and

maintained as described therein; and it is further




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the assessment method, maximum annual assessment

amount and first year assessments shown in Exhibit B hereby are adopted, levied and imposed.

Said first assessment shall be placed on the tax rolls and collected in the same manner as ad

valorem property taxes as provided by law if not otherwise paid by July 1, and, it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that, for purposes of Section 11b, Article XI of the

Oregon Constitution, said annual assessment amounts hereby are classified as “taxes levied or

imposed for the purpose of funding government operations” subject to the limit of $5 per $1000

of real market value; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the maximum annual assessment may be increased

after newspaper notice and public hearing to pass through direct cost increases for administration

and electricity as provided by Ordinance No. 3; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County Administrator, or his designee, shall take

steps to place matter of record and such other steps as are necessary to implement this Resolution

and Order.


BOARD OF DIRECTORS FORWASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICEDISTRICT FOR LIGHTING (No. SDL-1)

CHAIRMAN

RECORDING SECRETARY

PROPOSAL TO INSTALL, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN STREET LIGHTINGWASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING NO. SDL-1

WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON

ST. MARY’S WOODS APARTMENTS NO. 2

PART I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA - Currently, tax lot 1N117-00100PART II. ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05

A. Monthly Cost of Service

1. Lights (7-150 W / 16,000 L, HPS CobraLuminaries) @ $6.32 each $ 44.24

2. Poles (7-30ft.Bronze Poles) @ $.15 each $ 1.05

3. Total (Lights and Poles) $ 45.29

B. Annual Cost of Service

1. Streetlights and Poles ($45.29 x 12 Months) $ 543.48

2. Administration ($2.00 x 1 Lots) $ 2.00

3. Annual Cost for Service Area $ 545.48

4. Base Annual Cost Per Lot ($545.48 / 1 Lot) $ 545.48

5. Total Annual Cost Per Lot $ 545.48

C. Maximum Annual Assessment $ 1,090.96

PART III. LOCATION OF LIGHTS AND POLESPer attached Service Area Map

EXHIBIT BPage 1 of 1

AGENDA



Agenda Title: AMEND THE SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING (SDL) ANDESTABLISH A NEW MAXIMUM ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FORARBOR STATION NO. 2



The Board, by Resolution and Order No. 03-25 established an SDL for Arbor Station No. 2 onOctober 7, 2003. Arbor Station No. 2 is phase 2 of an approved 4-phase development.

A revised plat of Arbor Station No. 2 has been received which includes an additional 8 lots on 80feet of additional roadway which was originally planned as part of Arbor Station No. 3.

The proposed amended assessments are as follows:

Number Number of Number of of Lots Street lights Property Owners 148 17 1

Attachments: 1. Resolution and Order2. Street lighting proposal – Exhibit A3. Assessment Area Map – Exhibit B4. Vicinity Map

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:By Resolution and Order, amend assessment area within the Service District for Lighting andestablish a new maximum annual assessment.



Agenda Item No. 1.w.Date: 8/17/04




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36



In the Matter of Amending the Boundary ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERAnd Assessment Amount for Arbor Station No. 2 )For Assessment Area Number 1013 ) NO.


Lighting No.1, a County service district, at its meeting of August 17, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that staff has recommended that the boundary of Arbor Station

No. 2, (R & O 03-25) be amended to add eight (8) lots and to extend two (2) roads to an

additional 40 feet each as described in Exhibit A: and

It appearing to the Board that this amendment requires that the facilities described in

Exhibit A be added to the assessment area; and

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the proposed amendment to the existing SDL as

described in the updated feasibility report is hereby established.

Done and dated this 17th day of August 2004.


CHAIRMAN

RECORDING SECRETARY

PROPOSAL TO AMEND, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN STREET LIGHTINGWASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING NO. SDL-1


ARBOR STATION NO. 2 (Amendment)

PART I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA - Currently, tax lot 1S106DC-00200,0500, 00600, 00700, 00800 and 00900PART II. ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-04


1. Lights (17-100 W / 9,500L, HPS AcornLuminaire) @ $5.05 each $ 85.85

2. Poles (17-18ft.Black Pole) @ $.10 each $ 1.70



1. Streetlights and Poles ($87.55 x 12 Months) $ 1,050.60


3. Annual Cost for Service Area $ 1,346.60

4. Base Annual Cost Per Lot ($1,346.60 / 148 Lots) $ 9.09


C. Maximum Annual Assessment $ 18.19


EXHIBIT APage 1 of 1

AGENDA



Agenda Title: FORM ASSESSMENT AREA, AUTHORIZE MAXIMUM ANNUALASSESSMENT, AND IMPOSE A FIRST YEAR ASSESSMENTFOR CASCADIAN HEIGHTS NO. 3



A petition (with waiver of hearing and remonstrances) requests street lighting service for theCascadian Heights No. 3Number of Number Number of Number of Percent of SignaturesSignatures of Lots Street lights Property Owners Signatures Required 1 60 18 1 100% 51%

Attachments: 1. Resolution and Order2. Petition – Exhibit A3. Street lighting Proposal – Exhibit B4. Waiver and Continuing Request – Exhibit C5. Assessment Area Map – Exhibit D6. Vicinity Map

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:By Resolution and Order, (1) accept the petition(s), (2) form area as an assessment area withinthe Service District for Lighting, and (3) authorize maximum annual assessment and impose afirst year assessment.



Agenda Item No. 1.x.Date: 8/17/04




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36



In the Matter of Creating an Assessment Area, )Ordering Installation, Operation and Maintenance ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERof Street Lighting Facilities; Establishing a )Maximum Annual Assessment and Imposing a First ) NO. Year Assessment for Cascadian Heights No. 3 )


Lighting No.1, a county service district, at its meeting of August 17, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that 100% of the property owners in the proposed assessment

area described in Exhibit A, known as the Cascadian Heights No. 3 development, have requested

by petition that their property be included in an assessment area for purposes of installing,

operating and maintaining street lighting facilities and that said facilities be financed by special

assessments on their property; and

It appearing to the Board that 100% of the property owners voluntarily have waived their

right to notice, hearing remonstrance and referendum, and consent to assessment as set forth

herein; and

It appearing to the Board that the street lighting facilities described in Exhibit B, will be a

special benefit to the properties and that the assessment method and amounts represent a

reasonably fair and equitable manner for apportioning costs in relation to benefit; now, therefore

it is RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the assessment area described in Exhibit A hereby is

established, and, that the facilities described in Exhibit B, shall be installed, operated and

maintained as described therein; and it is further




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the assessment method, maximum annual assessment

amount and first year assessments shown in Exhibit B hereby are adopted, levied and imposed.

Said first assessment shall be placed on the tax rolls and collected in the same manner as ad

valorem property taxes as provided by law if not otherwise paid by July 1, and, it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that, for purposes of Section 11b, Article XI of the

Oregon Constitution, said annual assessment amounts hereby are classified as “taxes levied or

imposed for the purpose of funding government operations” subject to the limit of $5 per $1000

of real market value; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the maximum annual assessment may be increased

after newspaper notice and public hearing to pass through direct cost increases for administration

and electricity as provided by Ordinance No. 3; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County Administrator, or his designee, shall take

steps to place matter of record and such other steps as are necessary to implement this Resolution

and Order.



CHAIRMAN

RECORDING SECRETARY

PROPOSAL TO INSTALL, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN STREET LIGHTINGWASHINGTON COUNTY SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING NO. SDL-1


CASCADIAN HEIGHTS NO. 3

PART I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA - Currently, tax lot 1N121CD-01000,1N121CD-01200 and 1N121CD-08700PART II. ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05


1. Lights (13-100 W / 9,500 L, HPS AcornLuminaries) @ $5.05 each $ 65.65

2. Lights (5-150 W / 16,000 L, HPS AcornLuminaries) @ $6.83 each $ 34.15

3. Poles (18-18ft. Black Non-fluted Fiberglass Pole) @ $.10 each $ 1.80



1. Streetlights and Poles ($101.60 x 12 Months) $ 1,219.20


3. Annual Cost for Service Area $ 1,339.20

4. Base Annual Cost Per Lot ($1339.20 / 60 Lots) $ 22.32


C. Maximum Annual Assessment $ 44.64


EXHIBIT BPage 1 of 1


BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Agenda Category: Boards and Commissions

Agenda Title:APPOINTMENTS TO CLEAN WATER SERVICES ADVISORYCOMMISSION

Presented by: Bill Gaffi, General Manager (lk)


The District 4 position on the Clean Water Services Advisory Commission (CWAC) is vacant.Recruitment over the past several months resulted in the attached applications. Applicants wererecruited by newspaper, CPO newsletters, direct mail, and announcements.

The eligible applicants for the District 4 position are:Veta BrandawLolita CarterDeke GundersenFrank LippertDoug LonghurstVictoria LoweLoren RogersJon Stagnitti

Staff has interviewed the applicants, and recommends the Board of Directors appoint VictoriaLowe to the District 4 position.

(CONTINUED)

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A

REQUESTED ACTION: Staff recommends the Board of Directors review the applicationsand appoint Victoria Lowe as the District 4 representative, andreappoint Roger Neu as the homebuilder representative on the CleanWater Services Advisory Commission effective immediately.

Agenda Item No. 3.a.

Date: 8/17/04

Page 2

In addition, the Resolution and Order which governs CWAC states that members may serve twoterms. Roger Neu, who represents home builders, has served Clean Water Services for one termwhich has recently expired. Mr. Neu has indicated an interest in serving the second term if theBoard wishes reappointment. Mr. Neu has been a valued member of CWAC offeringcomprehensive input into and thoughtful analysis of policy recommendations. Staff recommendsMr. Neu be appointed to a second term effective immediately.

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Boards and Commissions (CPO 12C)

Agenda Title: APPOINTMENTS TO THE COOPERATIVE LIBRARYADVISORY BOARD

Presented by: Eva Calcagno, Cooperative Library Services Manager


The Cooperative Library Advisory Board (CLAB) includes a primary representative and analternate representative from each of the contractors to the Public Library Services Agreement,plus the West Slope Community Library (representing the County). Contractors nominateprimary and alternate representatives. Appointments are for two-year terms.

Two contractors wish to change their representatives at this time due to vacancies.

The City of Cornelius has nominated City Councilor John Groth as the primary representative,and City Councilor Alfredo Solares-Vega as the alternate.

Cedar Mill Community Library has nominated Harry Bodine as the primary representative, andDavid Dennison as the alternate.

The current terms for both contractors' representatives were to expire 9/15/04. They arerequesting that the new appointments be made earlier, in August 2004, so that officiallyappointed representatives may be present at the CLAB Annual Meeting on September 1st. Termsfor both contractors' representatives would then extend through the next term to September 15,2006.

Letters of nomination are attached.

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:That your Board make the appointment to the Cooperative Library Advisory Board as nominated.



Agenda Item No. 3.b.Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA


Agenda Category:Public Hearing – First Reading and First Public Hearing -Department of Land Use and Transportation All CPO’s

Agenda Title: PROPOSED LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 623 – AN ORDINANCEAMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODEELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATING TORECEIVING AND TRANSMITTING ANTENNAS ANDCOMMUNICATION AND BROADCAST TOWERS

Presented by: Brent Curtis, Planning Division Manager; Dan Olsen, County Counsel


Ordinance 623 proposes to make changes to the Community Development Code (Code) relatingto wireless telecommunication and broadcast towers and antennas. Changes range fromrestructuring existing Code Section 430-109 provisions into an easier to read and better organizedformat to removing regulations based upon radio frequency emissions. Other changes areintended to result in new antennas and towers that are less visible.

In 2003 the Board directed staff to conduct a two-year follow-up to the previous year’s wirelesstelecommunications regulations update and the adoption of Ordinance 591. The work to beundertaken in 2003 consisted primarily of conducting legal reviews of the County’s currentwireless telecommunication regulations, while the preparation of an ordinance would becompleted in 2004. The public involvement strategy as outlined in the Board’s March 10, 2003issue paper consisting of meeting with representatives of the Joint CPO TelecommunicationsTower Group as well as industry representatives and essential public communication providersand open houses was followed.

(continued)

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Read by title only and conduct the first public hearing for Ordinance 623. After taking testimony,consider continuing the hearing to September 7, 2004. However, in the event that the Board isprepared to deliberate, staff recommends that the Board direct engrossment of the ordinance toinclude the recommended changes set forth in Attachments “A” through “I” to the staff report,continue the hearing to September 21 and 28, 2004 as required by Chapter X of the CountyCharter, and direct staff to prepare and mail the Chapter X notice describing the engrossedchanges.



Agenda Item No. 4.a.Date: 8/17/04

PROPOSED LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 623August 17, 2004Page 2

On May 4, 2004, the Board provided staff with additional direction, specifically concerning keypolicy issues. The Board also directed staff to coordinate a working group comprised ofrepresentative from both the Joint CPO Telecommunications Tower Group and the wireless servicesindustry. The Board’s direction was in direct response to the request by several members of theworking group and industry representatives to continue to meet beyond the April 26th meetingfacilitated by staff. The newly formed group met five times in May and June and identified a list ofissues of common concern relating to the County’s current regulation of wirelesstelecommunication facilities and prepared a list of recommended changes for which there wasunanimous agreement.

On July 7, 2004, the Planning Commission (Commission) opened the public hearing on Ordinance623 and received limited testimony. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Commission continuedthe hearing to July 21, 2004. Staff recommended a continuance in order to be afforded time toprepare some minor fine-tuning changes in response to County Counsel comments as well as toreview the recommended changes submitted by the Cell Tower Working Group.

On July 21, 2004, the Commission opened the continued public hearing on Ordinance 623 andreceived limited testimony. At the conclusion of the July 21, 2004 hearing, the Commission votedunanimously to forward to the Board a recommendation that they engross Ordinance 623 to amend:

1. Exhibit 1 to include the changes set forth in Attachment “A”, including a recommended changein response to public testimony relating to a minor clarification of Section 430-109.1 B. (1) as itpertains to replacement antennas.

2. Exhibit 7 to include a definition of ‘Telecommunication Facility’, as described on page 4 of theJuly 21, 2004 Planning Commission staff report.

3. Exhibit 8 to allow replacement poles no more than 15 feet higher than the pole to be replaced asdescribed on page 7 of the July 21, 2004 Planning Commission staff report.

The staff report and attachments will be provided to the Board prior to the hearing and copies willalso be available at the Clerk’s desk.

Pursuant to Board direction on July 11, 1995, testimony about the ordinance will be limited to 12minutes for a representative of a recognized group and three minutes for individual testimony.

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Public Hearing – County Administrative Office (CPO 4B, 4K)

Agenda Title: CONSIDER INTERIM PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEMDEVELOPMENT CHARGE FOR PORTIONS OF THE BULLMOUNTAIN AREA

Presented by: Charles Cameron, County Administrator


On August 3, 2004, the Board continued the public hearing to August 17th to await action by theCity of Tigard about its proposed annexation plan for Bull Mt. The City is scheduled to takeaction on the plan on August 10th. If the City adopts the annexation plan and places it on theballot, the proposed park and recreation system development charge (SDC) and the companionintergovernmental agreement (IGA) can be adopted on the 17th. If adopted, the park SDC andIGA would become effective on August 18th. Staff will provide the Board with informationabout Tigard’s action on the annexation plan prior to the August 17th meeting.

On May 18, 2004, the Board conducted the first public hearing for the proposed park SDC forurban unincorporated properties in the Bull Mt. area as shown on the attached map. Currently,these properties do not have park and recreation services provided to them because they arelocated outside of the City of Tigard. The adopted Tigard Urban Service Agreement designatedTigard as the long-term park and recreation provider to the Bull Mountain area.

The purpose of the proposed park SDC is to provide interim funding for park and recreationcapital improvements to serve these properties. The County SDC would serve as a bridge untilthese properties are annexed to Tigard, at which time the County’s SDC would no (continued)

Attachment Map of affected properties. Information about the status of the Bull Mt. AnnexationPlan will be provided to the Board and the Clerk’s desk prior to August 17th.

Public testimony Limited to two minutes for individuals and five minutes for a representative ofa group.


Conduct the third public hearing. Staff will provide a recommendation following the City ofTigard’s August 10th Council meeting.


Continued from August 3, 2004

CONSIDER INTERIM PARK AND RECREATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGEFOR PORTIONS OF THE BULL MOUNTAIN AREAAugust 17, 2004Page 2

longer be applicable. If adopted, the park SDC would only apply to new development, such as anew home on a vacant lot. It would not be applicable to the expansion of an existing house.

The proposed SDC is consistent with the Board’s policy for park and recreation services providedTigard adopts its proposed annexation plan and commits to place it on the ballot. In 2003, theBoard adopted Ordinance No. 612, which allows the County to adopt an interim park SDC when thelong term park provider (Tigard in this instance) has committed to place an annexation plan on theballot. Placing an annexation plan on the ballot is necessary to help ensure the County’s proposedinterim park SDC would not be a long term program because the County is not a designated parkand recreation provider.

The basis for the County’s proposed park SDC methodology is Tigard’s park SDC methodology,park master plan and capital improvement plan. All three Tigard documents address theunincorporated properties in the Bull Mt. area. The Tigard Urban Service Agreement and the“Urban Services Intergovernmental Agreement Between City of Tigard and Washington County”also provide for the adoption of a park SDC for urban unincorporated Bull Mt.

Exhibit 7 of the “Urban Services Intergovernmental Agreement Between City of Tigard andWashington County” directs that the revenue from an SDC for urban unincorporated Bull Mt. be, tothe extent practicable, expended in the Bull Mt. area. The proposed resolution and order to adoptthe Bull Mt. park SDC includes this provision.

At the August 3rd hearing, CPO 4B submitted a resolution to the Board recommending that it notadopt the proposed park SDC unless the SDC revenue is “used exclusively for park acquisition anddevelopment on Bull Mountain or in Urban Growth Boundary Areas 63 or 64." The resolution waspassed on a vote of 16 in favor, one in opposition, and one abstention.

wpshare\Park SDC\Bull Mt\SDC agenda 08-17-04.doc

��

��

��

� �

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

�

��

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Public Hearing – County Counsel

Agenda Title: THIRD READING, FIRST PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSEDORDINANCE NO. 625; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COUNTYCODE SECTION 2.32, PERSONNEL

Presented by: Dan R. Olsen, County Counsel


Human Resources is proposing to amend County Code Section 2.32, the Personnel Ordinance ofWashington County. The proposed amendment would establish a new procedure for employeesreturning to their former position after a promotion, make two adjustments to the definition ofunclassified positions, and refine some of the language used in the Ordinance.

Under the current Personnel Ordinance, employees who have taken a promotion within theCounty, but fail their one-year probationary period in their new position, have the option ofreturning to their former position. If the former position has already been filled, the employeewho replaced the promoted employee is laid off or, if possible, reassigned. The “bumping out”scenario can be disruptive to the receiving department and particularly to the employee beingdisplaced.

The proposed amendment (attached) maintains the right to return to the former position, but onlyif the promotion took place within the same department, which is the more common scenario.Crossing departmental lines on a promotion will not entail a probationary period. To return toone’s former position would still be possible, but would be at the discretion of the receivingdepartment.

(Continued on Page 2)

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:Conduct third reading, first public hearing of proposed Ordinance 625. If not adopted, continueto a date certain for the fourth reading, second public hearing.




County CounselTHIRD READING, FIRST PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE 625Page 2

The proposed amendment also makes changes to the definition of positions not subject to CivilService (Unclassified). The position of Chaplain is added, at the request of the Sheriff, recognizingthe confidential nature of that position and to provide the Sheriff with more latitude in staffing thatposition. The other change clarifies that positions within the Human Resources division areunclassified. It has been the practice to identify these confidential positions as unclassified, but thelanguage in the current ordinance is not clear on that subject.

The proposed amendment also revises inconsistent or out-of-date language including making theemployee probationary period consistent with County collective bargaining agreements andrecognizing the name change for Clean Water Services.

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Action – County Administrative Office (CPO 4B, 4K)

Agenda Title: CONSIDER INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEENWASHINGTON COUNTY AND TIGARD FOR THECOLLECTION OF PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE

Presented by: Charles Cameron, County Administrator


On August 3, 2004, the Board continued this matter to August 17th to await action by the City ofTigard about its proposed annexation plan for Bull Mt. on August 10th. If the City adopts theannexation plan and places it on the ballot, the proposed interim park and recreation systemdevelopment charge (SDC) and this intergovernmental agreement (IGA) can be adopted on the17th. Staff will provide the Board with information about Tigard’s action prior to the August17th meeting.

The “Intergovernmental Agreement Between Washington County And City Of Tigard ForSystem Development Charge Collection” would authorize the City of Tigard to collectWashington County’s proposed park SDC for urban unincorporated Bull Mt. If Tigard places theannexation plan on the ballot, the park SDC and this IGA would become effective on August 18,2004 upon adoption by the Board on August 17th.

It is the Board’s intent that staff shall enter into the IGA the number of the resolution and orderadopting the Bull Mt. park SDC which preceded this item on the August 17th agenda.

The IGA requires:• Tigard to collect the County’s park SDC at the time building permits for new development

are issued by the City (continued)

Ø Public testimony is limited to three minutes for individuals and 12 minutes for arepresentative of a group.


Staff will provide a recommendation following the City of Tigard’s August 10th Council meeting.


Continued from August 3, 2004

CONSIDER INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTONCOUNTY AND TIGARD FOR THE COLLECTION OF PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTCHARGEAugust 17, 2004Page 2

• Tigard to hold County SDCs in a separate account until they have been remitted to the County• Tigard to remit collected SDCs to the County at least every 30 days• Tigard to identify for the County the location of each building site for which a County SDC is

collected• Washington County to pay Tigard a fee equal to three percent of each SDC collected to cover

the City’s administrative costs and accounting expenses associated with collection anddistribution of each SDC.

wpshare\Park SDC\Bull Mt\IGA agenda 8-17-04 BCC mtg.doc

AGENDA


Agenda Category: Action – Assessment & Taxation

Agenda Title: APPROVAL OF BALLOT TITLE AND EXPLANATORYSTATEMENT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY PEOPLES’UTILITY DISTRICT FORMATION AND LEVY

Presented by: Jerry Hanson, Director of Assessment & TaxationChris Gilmore, Assistant County Counsel


The Board of Commissioners approved the boundary for the Washington County Peoples’Utility District (PUD) on August 3, 2004 for purposes of submitting the question of whether toform the PUD to the voters at the November election.

Consistent with state law, the Petition also requested the County to submit the question ofwhether to approve a one-time property tax levy in the amount of $0.003 per thousand dollars ofassessed value. The levy is for purposes of paying for an engineer’s report on revenue bonds forthe acquisition or construction of an electric utility system and to pay for a later election to issuerevenue bonds if the PUD is formed. Approval of the levy would raise approximately$109.600.00.

County Counsel drafted a ballot title and explanatory statement for the question of whether to:(1) form a PUD and (2) approve the one-time property tax levy. Both the Petitioners and PGEwere provided an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed ballot titles andexplanatory statements.

County Counsel further drafted a Resolution and Order adopting the ballot titles and explanatorystatements for purposes of including them in the Voter’s Pamphlet and authorizing staff topresent this measure on the November ballot. The measure information must be filed with theCounty Clerk no later than September 2, 2004.


Approve the Resolution and Order or continue the matter no later than the next Board meetingset for August 24, 2004 in order to meet the filing deadline of September 2, 2004.




Page 1 – RESOLUTION AND ORDER



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

IN THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS


In the Matter of Calling for an Election ) RESOLUTION AND ORDERFor the formation of the Washington County ) No. _________Peoples’ Utility District and a Related Property )Tax Levy, Adopting Ballot Titles and Explanatory )Statements for Inclusion in the Voter’s Pamphlet )

This matter having come before the Board of Commissioners at a public hearing

conducted on July 20, 2004 and August 3, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that the Washington County Peoples’ Utility District boundary

was approved by Resolution and Order No. 04-95; and

It appearing to the Board that upon approval of the PUD boundary, state law requires the

Board to submit the question of PUD formation to the electors; and

It appearing to the Board that the PUD formation includes a request to authorize a property tax

levy in the amount of $0.003 per $1,000.00 assessed value; and

It appearing to the Board that County Counsel drafted ballot title s and explanatory

statements for both the PUD formation and the associated property tax levy; now, therefore, it is

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Ballot Title and Explanatory Statement set forth in

Exhibit “A” and “B” hereby are adopted as a concise and impartial statement of the question and

the effect of the PUD formation; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the draft Ballot Title and Explanatory Statement set

forth in Exhibit “C” and “D” are adopted as a concise and impartial statement of the proposed

property tax levy authorizing an amount of $0.003 per $1,000 assessed value if the PUD is

Page 2 – RESOLUTION AND ORDER



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

36

formed; and it is further

RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County Administrator, or his designee, and the

Elections Manager shall take such actions as are necessary to place both the ballot title and

explanatory statement for PUD formation and the associated property tax levy in the voter’s

pamphlet and place this measure before the voters at the November 2, 2004, election.

DATED this 3rd day of August, 2004.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON

CHAIRMAN

RECORDING SECRETARY

Exhibit A page 1 of 1

BALLOT TITLE FOR THE

PETITION REQUESTING FORMATION OF AWASHINGTON COUNTY PEOPLES’ UTILTY DISTRICT

CAPTION : Authorizes the formation of the Washington County Peoples’ Utility District

QUESTION: Shall voters form the Washington County Peoples’ Utility District coveringWashington County territory currently served by Portland General ElectricCompany?

SUMMARY: A majority vote in favor shall require the Board of Commissioners to issue anorder proclaiming the formation of the Washington County Peoples’ UtilityDistrict.

If created, this PUD shall include all of the territory in Washington County notincluding the City of Forest Department of Light and Power and the WestOregon Electric Cooperative. In addition, eight sections of Township 2N6Wwill be excluded as not having the requisite number of electors.

The corporate powers of the PUD shall include the authority to levy taxes,issue bonds, set rates, acquire real property, exercise the power of eminentdomain and other powers that are necessary and convenient for purposes ofproviding electrical service.

If the voters of any incorporated city cast a majority of votes againstformation of the PUD, that city will be excluded from the proposed PUD.

The PUD shall be managed by a board of elected directors consisting of fivemembers who shall be residents of the district.

Caption: 10 words (maximum is 10)Question: 20 words (maximum is 20)Summary: 164 words (maximum is 175)

Exhibit B page 1 of 1

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Forms Washington County Peoples’ Utility District

On April 29, 2004, an electors’ petition was filed for formation of the Washington CountyPeoples’ Utility District (PUD) to supply electric utility service. On August 3, 2004, theWashington County Board of County Commissioners, after a public hearing, found that thepetition complied with Oregon law and pursuant to ORS 261.161 determined that the boundariesof the proposed PUD must include all of Washington County except the area served by the Cityof Forest Grove Light and Power Department as well as the West Oregon Electric Cooperative,and a portion of Township 2N6W that includes 8 sections and no electors. The total areaexcluded from the boundary is approximately 455.95 square miles. If the voters of anyincorporated city cast a majority of votes against formation of the PUD, that city will beexcluded from the PUD. In no case will a yes vote on this measure result in including areasoutside the county in the proposed district boundary.

A “yes” vote on this measure will create the Washington County Peoples’ Utility Districtcomprised of the boundaries described above. The District will be governed by a5-person board of directors chosen by voters at this same election. Directors must be voters whohave resided in the proposed PUD area for not less than 2 years.

If the PUD is formed, the Board of Directors will have the authority to take any action authorizedby law, including acquiring utility assets from PGE by purchase or condemnation.

The law will not allow the PUD Board to interfere with or exercise any control over the City ofForest Grove Light and Power Department or the West Oregon Electric Cooperative withoutconsent. The PUD may cooperate with the City of Forest Grove Light and Power Department orthe West Oregon Electric Cooperative as authorized by law.

307(max 500 words)

Exhibit C page 1 of 1

BALLOT TITLE FOR THE

PETITION REQUESTING A TAX LEVY IF THEWASHINGTON COUNTY PEOPLES’ UTILTY DISTRICT IS FORMED

CAPTION : Authorizes property tax levy if Washington County PUD is formed.

QUESTION: Shall District impose a property tax of $0.003 per $1,000 of assessedvaluation starting July 2005 for an engineer’s report?

SUMMARY: If the Washington County Peoples’ Utility District is formed, this measureallows the District’s elected board of directors to impose a special property taxlevy on property within the district. Funds raised from the levy would be usedto pay for an engineer’s report on revenue bonds for the acquisition orconstruction of an electric utility system and to pay for a later election onwhether to issue revenue bonds, if called by the board.

This measure is estimated to raise a total of $109,600.00. The tax on a homewith an assessed value of $160,000 would be 48 cents. The estimated tax costfor this measure is an ESTIMATE ONLY based on the best informationavailable from the county assessor at the time of the estimate.

Caption: 10 words (maximum is 10)Question: 20 words (maximum is 20)Summary: 128 words (maximum is 175)

Exhibit D page 1 of 1

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Authorize Washington County Peoples’ Utility District Special Levy

On April 29, 2004, an electors’ petition was filed to form the Washington County Peoples’Utility District (PUD). As required by statute the elector’s petition includes a proposal for theauthorization for the district to impose a special property tax levy of $0.003 per $1000 ofassessed value. Funds raised from the levy would be used to pay for an engineer’s report onrevenue bonds for the acquisition or construction of an electric utility system and to pay for alater election to issue revenue bonds, if called by the PUD Board. The Board is required by lawto submit the special property tax levy to the electors in the affected territory for their approvalor rejection.

The Measure would authorize the PUD, if formed, to levy a one-time property tax of $0.003 perone thousand dollars ($1000) of assessed valuation. The proposed levy would raise totalestimated revenues of $109.600. The levy for a house with an assessed value of $160,000 wouldbe 48 cents. This would be a one-time levy, starting in July 2005.

186 words (500 max)

AGENDA

BOARD OF DIRECTORSHOUSING AUTHORITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

Agenda Category: Consent – Housing Authority

Agenda Title: AUTHORIZE INVITATION TO BID (#24070B) FOR PUBLICHOUSING INTERIOR/EXTERIOR PAINTING SERVICES

Presented by: Susan A. Wilson, Executive Director


The purpose of this agenda item is to request that your Board accept the following findings andreject all bids received in response to Invitation to Bid #24070B Interior and Exterior PaintingServices for Public Housing units and authorize the proposed painting contract to be re-bid.

The required legal advertisement and Invitation to Bid were issued July 8, 2004 requesting bidsfor a two-year painting contract. A total of seven bid documents were issued prior to bid openingtime and date of 11:00 a.m., July 26, 2004. Two bids were received.

Unlimited General Contracting submitted low bid with an average unit cost of $203.00, howeverBidder failed to submit Bid Bond as required by Housing and Urban Development (HUD)General Instructions. In accordance with HUD General Instructions, “Failure to submit a bidbond with the bid shall result in the rejection of this bid.”

North Pacific Construction submitted high bid with an average unit cost of $1,082.00. NorthPacific Constructions’ bid amount is five times higher than the average unit cost bid of UnlimitedGeneral Contractor, which is consistent with recent contracts. In accordance with the CountyPurchasing Rules, 30-102 (b) the Housing Authority Board may reject a bid when the pricepresented by the bidder is too costly to justify acceptance of the bid.

In summary, County Purchasing Rule 30-102 Rejection of all Offers states that the HousingAuthority Board may reject all Offers for good cause upon a Written finding if it is in the publicinterest to do so.DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:1) Authorize the Executive Director to reject the bids from Unlimited General Contracting andNorth Pacific Construction.

2) Authorize the re-bidding of Interior and Exterior Painting Services for Public Housing unit.



Agenda Item No.

H.A.1.a.

Date: 8/17/04

AGENDA

BOARD OF DIRECTORSHOUSING AUTHORITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

Agenda Category: Consent-Housing Authority

Agenda Title: SECTION EIGHT MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM(SEMAP) CERTIFICATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004

Presented by: Susan A. Wilson, Executive Director


The rating system for the SEMAP is similar to the Public Housing Management AssessmentProgram (PHMAP) (known as Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS); the rating isperformed exclusively by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. TheDepartment of Housing Services anticipates receiving an advisory rating of Standard Performeror higher.

Twenty-four CFR sec. 985.101 requires a Public Housing Agency (PHA) administering a Section8 tenant-based assistance program to submit an annual Section Eight Management AssessmentProgram (SEMAP) Certification within 60 days after the end of its fiscal year. The informationmeasures the performance of a Housing Authority and provides assurance that there is noevidence of seriously deficient performance. HUD uses the information to assess PHAmanagement capabilities and deficiencies and to assign an overall performance rating to the PHAthat will assist HUD in determining the effectiveness of the Housing Authority's Section 8program.

The specific areas of performance that will be evaluated involve the following:

• Selection from the Waiting List• Rent Reasonableness• Determination of Income• Utility Allowances

DEPARTMENT’S REQUESTED ACTION:That your Board approves the Resolution and Order and the SEMAP Certification for the Section8 Rental Assistance Program for fiscal year 2003-2004 and authorizes the Executive Director ofthe Housing Authority to submit the SEMAP Certification to HUD. Copies of the Certificationare available at the Clerk's desk.



Agenda Item No.

H.A.1.b.

Date: 8/17/04

Housing Authority of Washington CountySECTION EIGHT MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROGRAMCERTIFICATION 2003-2004Page 2

• Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Control• Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Enforcement• Expansion of Housing Opportunities• Fair Market Rents and Payment Standards• Annual Re-Examinations of Income and Rent Calculation• Pre-contract and Annual Housing Quality Standard (HQS) Inspections• Lease-up and Family Self-Sufficiency Program Enrollment• Deconcentration of Families Below Area Poverty Levels

Staff requests that your Board approves the Resolution and Order and the SEMAP Certification forthe Section 8 Rental Assistance Program for fiscal year 2003-2004 and authorize the ExecutiveDirector of the Housing Authority to submit the SEMAP Certification to HUD.

IN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FOR THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

In the Matter of Approving the ) Resolution and OrderSection Eight Management )Assessment Program (SEMAP) ) No._______________Certification Fiscal Year 2003-2004 )

This matter having come before the Board at its regular meeting of August 17, 2004; and

It appearing to the Board that staff completed the SEMAP Certification according to FederalRegulations and HUD’s instruction; and

It appearing to the Board that the SEMAP Certification for fiscal year 2003-2004 hasbeen presented to and reviewed by the Board, now therefore, it is

RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board of Directors for the Housing Authority ofWashington County that the Housing Authority of Washington County has complied with the HUDreporting requirements for the SEMAP Certification for fiscal year 2003-2004; and the Board ofDirectors for the Housing Authority of Washington County accepts the certification as being trueand correct.

ADOPTED by the Board of Directors for Washington County, Oregon, this 17th day ofAugust, 2004.

Chairman

Recording Secretary

MINUTES

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY

JULY 6, 2004

CONVENED: 10:09 a.m.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS:Director Tom BrianDirector Dick SchoutenDirector John LeeperDirector Roy RogersDirector Andy DuyckDirector Carol GakinDirector Sydney Sherwood

STAFF:Charles D. Cameron, County AdministratorDan Olsen, County CounselHenry Alvarez, Assistant Director of Housing ServicesPatt Opdyke, CPO Coordinator

PRESS:None.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:May 4, 2004

1. CONSENT AGENDA

It was moved to approve the Consent Agenda.

Motion – Sherwood2nd – GakinVote – 7-0

1.a.HA MO 04-6Authorize Insurance Premium Payment to the Housing Authority Risk Retention Pool(Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.b.HA MO 04-7Write Off Uncollectible Tenant Accounts in the Low Rent Public Housing Program(Approved Under Consent Agenda)

2. ORAL COMMUNICATION (2 MINUTE OPPORTUNITY)

None.


None.

4. BOARD OF DIRECTOR ANNOUNCEMENTS

Director Brian thanked Directors Gakin and Sherwood for taking the time to participatein these meetings.

5. ADJOURNMENT: 10:11 a.m.

Motion – Sherwood2nd – GakinVote – 7-0

MINUTES APPROVED THIS ____ DAY ________________________ 2004

_______________________________ ____________________________RECORDING SECRETARY DIRECTOR

MINUTES


JULY 27, 2004

CONVENED: 6:36 p.m.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS:Vice Chair Dick SchoutenCommissioner John LeeperCommissioner Roy RogersCommissioner Andy Duyck

Chairman Tom Brian was on vacation today.

STAFF:Charles D. Cameron, County AdministratorDan Olsen, County CounselKathy Busse, Assistant Director, LUTBob Cruz, Deputy General Manager, CWSLinda Gray, CPO CoordinatorJeff Friend, AudioVisual SpecialistBarbara Hejtmanek, Recording Secretary

PRESS:None.

1. CONSENT AGENDA

Vice Chair Schouten announced the following additions to the Consent Agenda:

• An off docket item from the County Administrative Office entitled “Appoint ThreeMembers to the Multnomah-Washington Regional Investment Board” is added to theConsent Agenda.

• An off docket item from the County Administrative Office entitled “Approve RevisedIntergovernmental Agreement with Multnomah County on Regional InvestmentProgram" is added to the Consent Agenda.

It was moved to adopt the Consent Agenda, as modified.

Motion – Rogers2nd – DuyckVote – 4-0

CLEAN WATER SERVICES

1.a.CWS RO 04-51Acquire an Easement to Provide Storm Sewer (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.b.CWS MO 04-74Approve Master Agreement and First Amendment for the West Basin Facilities PlanProject with West Yost & Associates (CPO 9, 12F) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.c.CWS MO 04-75Authorize General Manager to Sign Non-represented Employee Benefit InsurancePolicies for Fiscal Year 2005 (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.d.CWS MO 04-76Approve Contract for Water Rights Assistance (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.e.CWS MO 04-77Approve Agreement to Dedicate Real Property to City of Hillsboro for a StreetImprovement and Authorize General Manager to Execute Dedication Deed (CPO 9)(Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.f.CWS MO 04-78Approve Master Agreement and First Amendment for the Reclaimed Water Master PlanProject with Carollo Engineers, P.C. (All CPOs) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION

1.g.MO 04-288Approve Amendment for Construction Engineering Services for the Baseline RoadProject – Phase 3 (CPO 6, 7, 9) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.h.MO 04-289Approve Protective Rent Agreement for the 170th/173rd Baseline to Walker Project(CPO 7) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.i.MO 04-290Set a Public Hearing to Transfer Jurisdiction of Certain County Roads to the City ofHillsboro (CPO 8, 9) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

1.j.MO 04-291Approve Agreement with the State of Oregon for Food Inspection Services (ApprovedUnder Consent Agenda)


None.

3. PUBLIC HEARING3.a.CWS MO 04-73Approve Continuance of Public Hearing on Construction of Improvements to Benefit theBradhaven Local Improvement District

Bob Cruz reviewed that on June 22, 2004, the Board opened the public hearing to heartestimony concerning the proposed Bradhaven Local Improvement District. He recalledthat staff at that time requested the item to be continued to tonight in order to allow themto meet again with the neighborhood. Mr. Cruz explained that this additional meetingwas intended to ensure that staff could adequately coordinate with the developer anddecipher which method of service would be best for the neighborhood through thedevelopment and/or through the Local Improvement District. He reported that it wouldbe better for three of the lots to be served through the proposed development. In addition,Mr. Cruz told the Board that meetings with other individual property owners resulted inproposed revisions. He indicated that staff has informed the neighborhood of thesechanges. Mr. Cruz suggested continuing the public hearing one more week in order topermit adequate feedback from the neighborhood.

The public hearing was opened.

No public testimony was offered.

It was moved to continue the public hearing to August 3, 2004 to allow for the propertyowners affected by the Local Improvement District to indicate their level of support oropposition to the proposed modifications to the LID.

Motion – Duyck2nd – LeeperVote – 4-0

4. COUNTY COUNSEL4.a.MO 04-287Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 625; An Ordinance Amending County CodeSection 2.32, Personnel

There was a motion to read Ordinance No. 625 by title only.

Motion – Duyck2nd – RogersVote – 4-0

Dan Olsen read the proposed ordinance by title.

It was moved to continue this matter to August 3, 2004, for second reading.


4.b.RO 04-88 andRO 04-89Initiate Process for Formation of a Restricted Shooting District in the Metropolitan UrbanGrowth Boundary

Two Resolution and Orders were submitted for this item.

It was moved to approve the Resolution and Order establishing the proposed name of theRSD as the “2004 Metro Urban Growth Boundary Restricted Shooting District” anddelineate the boundaries for the RSD as those set forth in the over-sized map labeled as“Exhibit A”.

Motion – Rogers2nd – LeeperVote – 4-0

It was moved to approve the Resolution and Order to set a date for a public hearing onthe proposed RSD, provide required notice of the hearing and direct the Sheriff to preparea report on the proposed RSD.


Dan Olsen clarified that the public hearing will take place on August 24, 2004.


None.

6. BOARD ANNOUNCEMENTS

None.

7. ADJOURNMENT: 6:45 p.m.


MINUTES APPROVED THIS ____ DAY ____________________________ 2004

_______________________________ _________________________________RECORDING SECRETARY CHAIRMAN

MINUTES


AUGUST 3, 2004

CONVENED: 10:07 a.m.

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS:Chairman Tom BrianVice Chair Dick SchoutenCommissioner John LeeperCommissioner Roy RogersCommissioner Andy Duyck

STAFF:Charles D. Cameron, County AdministratorDavid Maertens, Senior Deputy County AdministratorPhilip Bransford, Communications OfficerDan Olsen, County CounselLoretta Skurdahl, Senior Assistant County CounselChris Gilmore, Assistant County CounselKathy Lehtola, Director, LUTJoanne Rice, Senior Planner, LUTDavid Schamp, Operations Manager, LUTMickie Kawai, Elections Manager, A&TBill Gaffi, General Manager, CWSAndy Braun, Principal Engineer, CWSBob Cruz, Deputy General Manager, CWSPatt Opdyke, CPO CoordinatorJeff Friend, AudioVisual SpecialistBarbara Hejtmanek, Recording Secretary

PRESS:Laura Gunderson, The OregonianDoug Browning, Hillsboro Argus

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:July 20, 2004

1. CONSENT AGENDA

Chairman Brian made note of the following modifications to the Consent Agenda:

• There is award of contract on item e. to BCI Contracting, Inc. in the amount of$379,936.

• An off docket item from Support Services entitled “Approve Findings and GrantExemption to Purchase and Build-Out a Weapons of Mass Destruction ResponseVehicle” is added to the Consent Agenda.

It was moved to adopt the Consent Agenda, as modified.

Motion – Schouten2nd – RogersVote – 5-0


1.a.CWS MO 04-79Direct Staff to Prepare an Engineering Study and Assessment Report for the PossibleFormation of the NW 87th at Barnes Road Local Improvement District (CPO 1)

1.b.CWS MO 04-80Direct Staff to Prepare an Engineering Study and Assessment Report for the PossibleFormation of the NW 94th Avenue Local Improvement District (CPO 1)

1.c.CWS RO 04-52Acquire Easements to Provide Sanitary Sewer, Storm and Surface Water Drainage andWater Quality (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.d.CWS MO 04-81Accept the Durham Paving Rehabilitation Project as Final and Authorize Release ofRetainage (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.e.CWS MO 04-82Award the Contract for the Celebrity Creek Culvert Enhancement Project to the LowestResponsible Bidder (CPO 6) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.f.CWS MO 04-83Authorize the General Manager to Negotiate and Sign Modification No. 1 to theMemorandum of Agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation for the Tualatin BasinWater Supply Feasibility Study (All CPOs) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)


1.g.MO 04-300Approve Agreement for Railway Crossing Engineering on the 19th and 20th AvenuesRealignment Project (CPO 12) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

1.h.RO 04-94Approve Establishment of a Road Maintenance Local Improvement District (MLID) forCascadian Heights No. 3 (CPO 7) (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

SHERIFF’S OFFICE

1.i.MO 04-301Authorize Acceptance of U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, StateCriminal Alien Assistance Grant (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

SUPPORT SERVICES

1.j.MO 04-302Accept Proposal and Award Contract for Third Party Administrative Services for ClaimsProcessing (Approved Under Consent Agenda)

OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

1.k.MO 04-303Approve Amendment to Community Development Block Grant Project Agreement –City of Sherwood, Senior Center Classroom Addition (Approved Under ConsentAgenda)


None.

3. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS3.a.MO 04-295Appointments to the Metzger Park Advisory Board (CPO 4M)

There was a motion to appoint Nicole Berg, Mike Donovan and Nick Moriniti for termsexpiring June 30, 2007 and Dimitri Guillen for a term expiring June 30, 2006.


3.b.MO 04-296Appointments to the Washington County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board

It was moved to appoint Steven Seeley, Ray Wold and Wendy Zurcher for terms expiringJune 30, 2007, Nick Atanasov for a term expiring June 30, 2006, and Ronald Hoodenpylfor a term expiring June 30, 2005.

Motion – Duyck2nd – LeeperVote – 5-0

OFF DOCKET – CLEAN WATER SERVICESCWS RO 04-53Public Hearing on Construction of Improvements to Benefit the Bradhaven LocalImprovement District

Andy Braun reviewed that this public hearing was opened on June 22, 2004, continued toJuly 27, 2004, and then continued again to today. He explained that the continuance wasrequested in order to respond to owners requesting removal from the Local ImprovementDistrict because they would be better served by a recently-proposed development. Mr.Braun told the Board that in response, staff held an additional neighborhood meeting onJuly 12, 2004 in order to update the owners on the revised LID boundary, seweralignment and assessments. He reported that the revised boundary includes 20 lots—encompassing approximately ten acres on Green View Lane, Brady Lane and CornellRoad at 102nd Avenue. Mr. Braun said that the project involves the extension ofapproximately 2,700 lineal feet of 8-inch sewer—570 of which would be offsite at theDistrict’s expense. He stated that the estimated project cost is $325,600, with the Districtcost share of $93,000 as well as potential connection incentives of $44,500. Mr. Braunindicated that zoning in the District is R-6, allowing 6 units per acre, and added that eachlot is currently developed with one home. He related that the proposed method of

assessment for the project is equal assessments by lot. Mr. Braun informed the Boardthat the estimated assessments are $11,641 per lot or $9,416 after connection incentivesare applied. He said that following the July 12th neighborhood meeting, ballots werereceived until July 23, 2004. Mr. Braun reported that the ballots indicated that 16 ownersare in favor of the project, zero are opposed four did not respond.


No public testimony was provided.

The public hearing was closed.

It was moved to adopt the Resolution and Order directing the District to proceed with theBradhaven LID project as modified.


4. PUBLIC HEARINGS – LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION4.a.RO 04-90Levy Assessments for NW 195th Avenue Local Improvement District (CPO 14)

Dave Schamp recalled that in January of 2002, the Board enacted Resolution and Order02-8, which adopted a feasibility report and established the 195th Local ImprovementDistrict. He explained that this was to hard-surface 195th Avenue and to make drainageimprovements for approximately ½ mile north of Phillips Road. Mr. Schamp reviewedthat a public hearing was held on February 26, 2002 and that no remonstrances werereceived. He went on to say that Resolution and Order 02-27 authorized theimprovements. Mr. Schamp reported that those improvements were completed in Augustof 2002, for an actual cost of $72,040. He compared this to the estimated cost of$87,095. Mr. Schamp mentioned that staff was able to take advantage of a contractedoverlay project, which reduced actual costs for the paving substantially. He summarizedthat the County’s share is $5,701, leaving $66,339 to be assessed to the LocalImprovement District.

For the record, Commissioner Schouten asked why the County is paying for one share ofthis.

Mr. Schamp responded that the County picks up the cost that would be incurred for theactual maintenance of the roadway, were the improvements not to be made. He identifiedthis amount as $1,642 per year. (This would be the County’s cost to maintain it as agravel road.)

It was moved to approve the Resolution and Order levying assessments for the NW 195thAvenue Local Improvement District.

Motion – Schouten2nd – LeeperVote – 5-0

4.b.RO 04-91Approve Proposal to Name a Public Street, SW Stepping Stone Drive (CPO 6)

Kathy Lehtola told the Board that staff has received a petition from 100 percent of theadjoining property owners to name an unnamed public street. She explained that becauseof the light rail just north of Baseline, the new alignment enables people traveling east onBaseline to go north onto 185th. Mrs. Lehtola related that property owners in the areawould like this to be called SW Stepping Stone Drive.


No public testimony was offered.


It was moved to approve a proposal to name a public street SW Stepping Stone Drive.


4.c.RO 04-92Approve Transfer of Jurisdiction of Certain County Roads to the City of Beaverton (CPO1)

Kathy Lehtola reported that the City of Beaverton has requested transfer of jurisdiction ofa portion of SW 150th Avenue to Beaverton. She referenced the map in the agendapacket and let the Board know that the area on the right side of SW 150th Avenue hasalready been annexed into Beaverton. Mrs. Lehtola believed that all but one of theproperties have been developed. She recommended transferring jurisdiction to the Cityof Beaverton.


No public testimony was forthcoming.


It was moved to approve the Resolution and Order surrendering jurisdiction of CertainCounty Roads to the City of Beaverton (C.R. 3187T/J)

Motion – Duyck2nd – SchoutenVote – 5-0

5. PUBLIC HEARING – COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE5.a.MO 04-297Consider Interim Park and Recreation System Development Charge for Portions of theBull Mountain Area (CPO 4B, 4K)

Chairman Brian observed that both items 5.a. and 6.a. pertain to the proposed InterimPark and Recreation System Development Charge for portions of the Bull Mountain area.He announced that the Board intends to take public testimony and then plans to continueboth of these items while awaiting the outcome of the City of Tigard’s decision.Chairman Brian noted that whatever the City of Tigard decides will affect whether thismeasure is necessary or not.

Joanne Rice had little to add to the Chair’s introductory remarks. She informed theBoard that Tigard has continued its deliberations on the annexation plan to August 10,2004, and that the City of Tigard is accepting written testimony through today.


Holly Shumway, Chair, CPO 4B, submitted (and read portions of) Resolution No. 04-03into the record and it may be found in the Meeting File. She advised the Board not toapprove the proposed Interim Park and Recreation System Development Charge for newdevelopment on urban, unincorporated properties in the Bull Mountain area unless thecollected funds are used exclusively for park acquisition and development on BullMountain or in Urban Growth Boundary Areas 63 or 64. Ms. Shumway read:

“Whereas, CPO 4B has authority by simple majority vote to adopt resolutions advisinglocal governments of matters which affect persons and properties within the CPOboundaries; and

Whereas, CPO 4B is the recognized citizen participation organization of WashingtonCounty which includes a majority of residents and property within unincorporated BullMountain and Tigard City limits; and

Whereas, the Washington County Board authorized staff to prepare for its considerationan interim park and recreation system and development charge for new development onurban, unincorporated properties in the Bull Mountain area to provide interim fundingfor park and recreation capital improvements to serve the unincorporated Bull Mountainarea; and

Whereas, unincorporated Bull Mountain does not have park and recreation services asthe County has not been a park and recreation provider but has relied instead on theTualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (THPRD) and cities to provide theseservices; and

Whereas, THPRD is the only provider of park, recreation and open spaces services tourban unincorporated Washington County; and

Whereas, sustained rapid levels of development since the 1980’s have outpaced thecapability of THPRD to provide the level of services called for in its master plan; and

Whereas, THPRD’s financial constraints also precluded it from acquiring future parkland in areas outside its current boundary but within its ultimate service area; and

Whereas, unincorporated properties located outside THPRD’s boundary are notprovided with park and recreation services with the exception of the Metzger area whichfunds Metzger Park through a Local Improvement District for as long as the propertyowners within the LID wish to continue to pay annual levies for the operation andmaintenance of Metzger Park; and

Whereas, Policy 33, Implementing Strategy c.4 of the Comprehensive Framework Planfor the Urban Area requires the City of Tigard to place an annexation plan for the BullMountain area on the ballot before the Board can adopt a park SDC for the BullMountain area; and. . .

Now, therefore be it resolved that the members of CPO 4B advise the Washington CountyBoard of Commissioners to not approve the proposed Interim Park SDC unless:

Section 1: SDC’s for new development on Bull Mountain are collected with the fullintention of being utilized solely for the acquisition and development of parks,recreational facilities and open spaces specifically on Bull Mountain or in urban growthboundary areas 63 or 64. There is no verification that SDC’s collected from newdevelopment outlined in the proposal would be utilized solely and specifically on BullMountain or UGB areas 63 or 64. There exists an element of ambiguity as to where themoney would be spent, on Bull Mountain or utilized for parks in the service area of theCity, which would be the most likely provider of urban services, i.e., Tigard.

Section 2: This writing of and presentation of this resolution passed by a majorityvote of CPO 4B members on July 8, 2004 at the CPO 4B general meeting.

Section 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage.

PASSED: This 8th day of July, 2004.”

Chairman Brian thanked Ms. Shumway for her participation and testimony.

Commissioner Rogers concurred with the CPO 4B position, namely, that funds raised inthat particular area be spent in that particular area. For the record, he asked staff toexplain how the Board would be looking more specifically at the locational issue in thefuture.

Loretta Skurdahl commented that the Resolution and Order, as drafted, simply states theBoard’s intent to spend the funds in the Bull Mountain area or in an area that wouldbenefit the Bull Mountain area. She clarified that the means by which the SystemDevelopment Charge would be implemented as proposed so far would call for the fundsto be collected by the City of Tigard and then remitted to the County on a monthly basis.Ms. Skurdahl summarized that these would be County funds and that the Board wouldhave exclusive control over how those funds would be spent. She presumed that thiswould come before the Board in a contract to purchase land to provide for a specificpublic improvement or in something of that type. Ms. Skurdahl said that staff has notproposed anything that would be an ordinance or controlling structure in advance.However, in order to spend those funds, she presumed there would be a need to contractfor some kind of land acquisition or contract for public improvement.

Vice Chair Schouten noticed a reference to Exhibit 7, which speaks of an Urban ServiceIntergovernmental Agreement between the City of Tigard and Washington County whichwould direct revenue from a System Development Charge—to the extent practicable—tobe expended on the Bull Mountain area.

Ms. Skurdahl noted that this issue obviously has some practicalities associated with it aswell. She did not know if the System Development Charge, once adopted, wouldgenerate $10,000 in the first year or $100,000 in the first year. Ms. Skurdahl interpreted“the extent practicable” to mean what can you do to actually benefit that area with thefunds you have in hand. She recognized that this would depend on how much the moneyis and on what opportunities there may be for park property acquisition or enhancementof an existing facility.

Charles Cameron acknowledged that the Board has made it very clear that, to themaximum extent practicable, any money that is generated in the interim period would bespent on Bull Mountain. He said that if a minimal amount of money is raised and isinsufficient for a need, ostensibly at the same time there could be a capital improvementproposed for a regional facility like Cook Park, by which everyone in the region benefits.Mr. Cameron pointed out that this would be an option down the road. He knew it wouldbe great if in absolute terms, language could be suggested that called for every nickelraised on Bull Mountain to be spent on Bull Mountain. However, he realized that this

may turn out to be neither possible nor feasible. Mr. Cameron thought that this bridgecould be crossed when it arrives. He recognized that this might not provide the residentsof Bull Mountain ultimate satisfaction but reiterated that a practical consideration needsto be made before locking the Board into a situation that may not be able to be honored.

Chairman Brian added that the timing, too, is uncertain. He said that at $300,000 to$400,000 per acre, the funds may be spent on Bull Mountain but this may need to occurseven or more years in the future. Chairman Brian recognized that it depends on how fastthe SDC’s come in. He pointed out that it would take a lot of money to buy ten acres, forexample. Chairman Brian did not want to get too deeply into that aspect. He understoodthe point and noted that the Board has expressed support for spending the money fromwhence it comes. Chairman Brian stated that the details of how to get to that and whatexceptions would reasonably be made can be discussed when it is decided to go forwardwith this resolution. He concluded that the Board has to wait and see what the City doesfirst.

Vice Chair Schouten said that the phrase “to the extent practicable” contains a clear intentto use that money in Bull Mountain if possible. He added that it would not be prudent tobind the County’s hands if that is not practicable.

Commissioner Rogers hoped to gain clarity on this issue and others in the near future.

Holly Shumway wished to speak again, this time as an individual.

The Board’s policy was not to allow “second bites at the apple” but Chairman Brianassured her that there will be an open and full discussion of this before proceeding.

There was a motion to continue this public hearing to August 17, 2004 to await finalaction by Tigard.


6. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE6.a.MO 04-298Consider Agreement Between Washington County and Tigard for the Collection of aPark System Development Charge (CPO 4B, 4K)

The Board continued this item to August 17, 2004, in order to place it on a parallel coursewith item 5.a.

5.b.RO 04-93Consideration of Renewal of the Community Safety Levy – FY 2005-06 through FY2008-09 – Review and Adopt Ballot Title and Explanatory Statement

Philip Bransford stated that the purpose of this public hearing is to provide informationabout and receive comment regarding renewal of the Community Safety Local OptionLevy for Fiscal Years 2005-2006 through 2008-2009. He said that this proposal supportsessentially the same criminal justice system staff and service levels approved by voters inthe original Community Safety Levy in November of 2000. Mr. Bransford mentionedthat the levy supports roughly one-fifth of the County’s total criminal justice system staffand services network. He announced that the final summary document (which outlinesthe levy renewal proposal) is available for review at the Clerk’s desk or may be obtainedby contacting the County Administrative Office. Mr. Bransford summarized that theproposal itself totals $68 million for an average of $17 million annually for the four yearperiod. He said that it is projected to have an average annual taxpayer impact of 42 centsper $1,000 assessed value, which is 1 cent less than the current levy. Mr. Bransfordstated that for a resident owning an average priced Washington County home, the tax ratefor the proposed levy renewal equates to an estimated annual cost of about $79 per yearor $7 per month. He commented that the proposed levy provides funding for about 137positions, which is about five positions more than the positions funded by the currentlevy.

Mr. Bransford highlighted the several factors associated with the significance of therenewal of the Community Safety levy:

• The current levy is a significant contributor of financial support to the County’s two-tiered role as a law enforcement agency and as a mandated provider of overall justicesystem services (incarceration, prosecution, probation/parole, juvenile, etc.). In fiscalyear 2003-04, the levy supported approximately 16% of the County’s total criminaljustice operating budget ($13.3 million out of a total budget of $81.2 million dollars.)

• Levy support for County-wide justice processing services is heavily relied upon by allcity and county law enforcement agencies and contributes to the maintenance ofbalance in the delivery of justice system programs.

• There has been no let-up in the demands placed on the justice system by growth inCounty population, by increases in law enforcement assets deployed by lawenforcement agencies and by dramatic reductions in historic levels of state fundingfor certain key justice system programs (community corrections and juvenileprevention).

• The current levy has made significant inroads toward the restoration of service levelsthat had eroded significantly prior to the levy’s passage in 2000. Levy-fundedservices, therefore, provide vital and basic justice system capacity that wouldotherwise be sorely missed if not funded.

David Maertens provided the Board with staff’s recommendation, which consisted of twosuggested motions:

1. Based on Board comments at the July 20, 2004 public hearing, amendments to page62 of the levy proposal have been included to provide a more generic description ofemergency housing programs and services. This amendment will allow for moreflexibility in the allocation of those emergency housing funds during the course ofthe proposed levy period.

2. Adopt the Resolution and Order calling for the November election. Adopt the BallotTitle and Explanatory Statement.

Dan Olsen recommended that the word “uniformly” be deleted from the last sentence ofthe draft Explanatory Statement (Exhibit B). Sentence would now read: “Levy renewalwould apply to all taxable property, including industrial, commercial and residential.”


No public testimony was delivered.


It was moved to adopt the amended language for page 62 of the levy proposal.


There was a motion to adopt the Resolution and Order, Ballot Title and ExplanatoryStatement calling for a November 2, 2004 election regarding the Proposal for a Four-Year Community Safety Local Option Levy with its accompanying recommendations,budget and estimated tax impacts.

Motion – Leeper2nd – DuyckVote – 5-0

Vice Chair Schouten observed that this is the continuation of a present levy at roughly thesame rate. He noted that it makes possible the County’s ability to provide all of thesupport services that need to come after people are arrested and is essential for the goodorder of the justice system.

Chairman Brian called attention to the prevention component of the measure, as well asthe element of homeless care. He noted that this has been able to prevent some veryunfortunate circumstances, including criminal activity. Chairman Brian appreciated

staff’s work in bringing in this levy one cent lower than the previous 5-year levy. Herecognized that a lot of needs could have been inserted into this levy that were not.

OFF DOCKET – ASSESSMENT & TAXATIONRO 04-95Continued Public Hearing to Determine Boundaries of the Proposed People’s UtilityDistrict

Chris Gilmore announced that today’s hearing is required by State law and that itspurpose is to set the boundaries for the proposed Washington County People’s UtilityDistrict. He said that the decision of whether to form the People’s Utility District isreserved for the voters in the November election. Mr. Gilmore reviewed that the originalhearing conducted on July 20, 2004, brought a few issues to light. He addressed threeissues raised by Portland General Electric:

• Accuracy of the proposed boundary for the Western Oregon Electric Cooperative. Asa matter of State law, existing cooperatives that are providing service are to beexcluded from the proposed PUB boundary. A map was displayed, which includedthe WOEC boundary as recommended by staff. WOEC received this map from thePublic Utility Commission and it is believed that that is the best evidence in therecord that the boundary is accurate. No communications have been received whichwould undermine that boundary and staff is confident that this is correct. Theadditional area identified on the map is the City of Forest Grove Light and Power.State law also requires existing municipal providers to be excluded. Those two areaswere a part of the original staff recommendation and they will continue to be part ofstaff’s recommendation for the proposed boundary.

• Should certain areas be excluded from the boundary based on the number of electoralvoters within each township? Staff went through the areas identified by PGE to tallythe number of electoral votes for each township or portion of a township. By Statelaw, if there are greater than ten electoral votes within a township or portion of atownship, that area continues to be within the proposed PUD and cannot be excluded.All of the areas that staff reviewed within the proposed PUD boundary containgreater than ten electors except for the area on the map identified in green. Theelectoral count and testimony from staff indicate that those urban areas withtownships that are mostly developed also include a population base that is greaterthan ten electors but may not be reflected on the list of accounts brought to thehearing by Mr. Gilmore today. The only area staff recommends excluding from thePUD boundary is the green area based on the electoral counts. That area has zeroelectors and that would be the only additional change in the boundary from the lasthearing on this issue.

• There is a legal question as to whether or not it is constitutional to include portions ofcities within a proposed PUD boundary. State law ORS 261.110.1 expressly providesthat a PUD may consist of portions of municipalities. It is clear, based on State law,that a PUDcan include portions of cities. There are some arguments presented byPGE that the constitution can be interpreted to say that portions of cities must be

excluded and may not be included in the boundary. The Office of County Counseladvises that until a Court of competent jurisdiction reviews the Constitution andinterprets it to direct Washington County to not include those areas within the PUDboundary, staff will continue to advise the Board to follow existing State law.

Chris Gilmore believed that these three issues have been resolved either by legal counselor through the hard work of Assessment and Taxation staff members.


Chairman Brian reminded all parties that the issue before the Board today is the narrowconsideration of the shape of the district—not the pros or cons of a PUD, PGE oranything else.

Judy Crafton, Government Affairs Representative, Portland General Electric, 121 SWSalmon, Portland, Oregon, thanked the Board and staff for their hard work addressing theissues PGE brought up at the last hearing on the boundaries. She reported that PGE,however, disagrees with staff’s recommendation not to exclude the portions of the cities.Ms. Crafton referenced today’s Worksession discussion and clarified that Judge Wilsonof Multnomah County will hold an emergency hearing on August 13, 2004. She relatedthat at that time, Judge Wilson will provide an opportunity for people who want to beintervenors in the decision and will decide at that time whether or not to reconsider herrecent ruling.

Colin Brennan, 1842 NW 156th, Beaverton, Oregon, supported the PUD proposal. Heasked what area is being excluded from the boundary.

Chris Gilmore utilized the colored map to respond to Mr. Brennan’s query. Hecommented that there are no electors in the portion alluded to by Mr. Brennan.

Colin Brennan wished to go on record with his belief that cities can be broken up for thePUD boundary, based upon what exists in Eugene and other cities throughout the State.

Jim McNaughton, 12948 SW 5th, Beaverton, Oregon, provided his opinion that if an areais broken up, the County is depriving the people in those areas from making their owndecision. He regarded this as undemocratic and against the process of the Constitution.Mr. McNaughton believed that it would be a disgrace for the Board to allow acorporation such as Enron or Portland General Electric to interpret the Constitution.

Shantu Shah, 6637 SW 88th Avenue, Portland, Oregon, identified himself as anEngineer, U.S. citizen, and Constitutional expert. He concurred with staff relative to theareas excluded. Mr. Shah said that the area of the PUD could be served as one utilitydistrict and could easily be taken over from PGE.


It was moved to adopt the Resolution and Order approving the proposed boundary asrecommended by staff.

Motion – Leeper2nd – RogersVote – 5-0

7. COUNTY COUNSEL7.a.MO 04-299Second Reading of Proposed Ordinance No. 625; an Ordinance Amending County CodeSection 2.32, Personnel

There was a motion to read Proposed Ordinance No. 625 by title only.


Dan Olsen read the proposed ordinance by title.

It was moved to continue the ordinance to August 17, 2004 for third reading and firstpublic hearing.

Motion – Schouten2nd – DuyckVote – 5-0


None.


Chairman Brian announced that this month’s Housing Authority meeting will be held onAugust 17, 2004.

10. ADJOURNMENT: 11:00 a.m.


MINUTES APPROVED THIS ____ DAY _______________________________ 2004

_______________________________ ___________________________________RECORDING SECRETARY CHAIRMAN

Washington County, OregonBoard of Commissioners

last update: August 9, 2004

MEETING NOTICEWASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

AUGUST 17, 2004

10:00 A.M.

Tom Brian, Chairman John Leeper, CommissionerDick Schouten, Vice Chair Roy Rogers, Commissioner Andy Duyck, Commissioner

The Board of Commissioners will meet for a general worksession in Room 140 of the PublicServices Building at 8:30 a.m.

Worksession Agenda (Updated 8/13/04) (PDF, 8K) (RTF, 53K)

The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, as the governing body ofWashington County, the Housing Authority and all County service districts for which thisBoard so acts, will meet for its regular Board meeting in the Shirley Huffman Auditorium ofthe Public Services Building at 10:00 a.m.

* SEE ATTACHED AGENDA - POSTED AUGUST 13, 2004 *

WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSAUDITORIUM

AUGUST 17, 2004

All public meetings are recorded.

The agenda items listed below are provided in Adobe Acrobat and Rich Text Format. Thelatest free Acrobat reader may be downloaded from: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html. As some of the attachments are notavailable in Rich Text Format, you may call 503-846-8685 for an alternative means ofviewing these items.

Housing Authority Board of Directors Agenda

1. CONSENT AGENDA

The items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and will allbe adopted in one motion unless a Board member or person in theaudience requests, before the vote on the motion, to have the itemconsidered separately. If any item is removed from the ConsentAgenda, the Chairman will indicate when it will be discussed in theregular agenda. A list of Consent Agenda items is included at the endof the agenda packet.

2. ORAL COMMUNICATION

Limited to two minutes per individual; ten minutes total.

3. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS

a. Appointments to Clean Water Services Advisory Commission(PDF, 15K) (RTF, 17K)

19

b. Appointments to the Cooperative Library Advisory Board(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 11K)

21

4. PUBLIC HEARING - LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION

a. Proposed Land Use Ordinance No. 623 - An OrdinanceAmending the Community Development Code Element of theComprehensive Plan Relating to Receiving and TransmittingAntennas and Communication and Broadcast Towers(PDF, 10K) (RTF, 17K)

23

5. PUBLIC HEARING - COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE

a. Consider Interim Park and Recreation System DevelopmentCharge for Portions of the Bull Mountain Area(PDF, 466K) (RTF, 15K)

25

6. PUBLIC HEARING - COUNTY COUNSEL

a. Third Reading, First Public Hearing of Proposed Ordinance No.625; An Ordinance Amending County Code Section 2.32,Personnel(PDF, 7K) (RTF, 12K)

29

7. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE

a. Consider Agreement between Washington County and Tigard forthe Collection of Park System Development Charge(PDF, 19K) (RTF, 14K)

31

8. ASSESSEMENT AND TAXATION

a. Approve Ballot Title and Explanatory Statement for WashingtonCounty Peoples' Utility District Formation and Levy(PDF, 19K) (RTF, 30K)

33



11. ADJOURNMENT

CONSENT AGENDA

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

July 27, 2004(PDF, 13K) (RTF, 11K)

41

August 3, 2004(PDF, 36K) (RTF, 42K)

47


a. Acquire an Easement to Provide Water Quality Preservation andStorm and Surface Water Drainage(PDF, 19K) (RTF, 64K)

63

b. Approve an Agreement with Comcast of Tualatin Valley, Inc. toUtilize the Metropolitan Area Network(PDF, 15K) (RTF, 12K)

67

c. Award the Contract for the Willow Creek Water Quality andEnhancement Project to the Lowest Responsible Bidder (CPO 7)(PDF, 17K) (RTF, 12K)

69

d. Approve the Purchase of Flow Monitoring Equipment(PDF, 16K) (RTF, 13K)

71

e. Award of Contracts for Rock Creek Digester and Forest GroveAdministration Building Roof Replacement Projects to SnyderRoofing and Bob Carlson, Inc. (CPO 9, 12F)(PDF, 15K) (RTF, 18K)

73

f. Quitclaim a Permanent Storm and Surface Water DrainageEasement to Anthony Spiering (CPO 8)(PDF, 14K) (RTF, 17K)

75


g. Approve Amendment for Preliminary Engineering Services forthe Highway 99W/SW Hall Boulevard Intersection Project (CPO4M)(PDF, 39K) (RTF, 13K)

77

h. Set Public Hearing to Name County Road (NW Collins Road)(CPO 8)(PDF, 54K) (RTF, 18K)

81

i. Approve Amendment for Preliminary Engineering Services forthe NW Cornell Road/NW 179th Avenue to NW BethanyBoulevard Project (CPO 7)(PDF, 91K) (RTF, 13K)

87

j. Approve Declaration of Necessity and Protective Rent Paymentsfor the Side Streets Impacted by the Walnut Street/121st to 135thAvenues Project (CPO 4B)(PDF, 238K) (RTF, 11K)

91

k. Set Public Hearing to Transfer Jurisdiction of Certain CountyRoads to the City of Beaverton(PDF, 63K) (RTF, 11K)

97

l. Set Public Hearing to Transfer Jurisdiction of Certain CountyRoads to the City of Tigard (CPO 4M)(PDF, 47K) (RTF, 11K)

101

COUNTY COUNSEL

m. Authorize Relocation of Graves in Right-of-Way(PDF, 48K) (RTF, 10K)

105

COMMNITY DEVELOPMENT

n. Approve Fair Housing Plan Regarding Analysis of Fair HousingImpediments(PDF, 8K) (RTF, 23K)

107

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

o. Approve Agreement with the State of Oregon to Provide Alcoholand Drug Specialist Services(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 10K)

109

p. Approve Amendment to the 2004-2005 Contract with the ARC ofWashington County to Provide Services for Persons withDevelopmental Disabilities(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 10K)

111

q. Increase Budget Appropriations for the Department of Health andHuman Services, Public Health Division by $94,856 in StateHealth Division Funds(PDF, 11K) (RTF, 19K)

113

SHERIFF'S OFFICE

r. Authorize Execution of Contract with State Marine Board(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 10K)

115

s. Authorize Execution of Agreement with the City of Portland forReceipt of Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) GrantEquipment(PDF, 7K) (RTF, 11K)

117

SUPPORT SERVICES

t. Authorize Private Sale of County-Owned Parcel (CPO 12F)(PDF, 43K) (RTF, 13K)

119

u. Amend the Washington County 2004-2005 Pay Plan for CertainClassifications in the Department of Land Use and Transportation(PDF, 9K) (RTF, 16K)

123

SERVICE DISTRICT FOR LIGHTING NO. 1

v. Form Assessment Area, Authorize Maximum AnnualAssessment, and Impose a First Year Assessment for St. Mary'sWoods Apartments No. 2 (CPO 6)(PDF, 637K) (RTF, 26K)

127

w. Amend the Service District for Lighting (SDL) and Establish aNew Maximum Annual Assessment for Arbor Station No. 2(CPO 6)(PDF, 117K) (RTF, 24K)

147

x. Form Assessment Area, Authorize Maximum AnnualAssessment, and Impose a First Year Assessment for CascadianHeights No. 3 (CPO 7)(PDF, 372K) (RTF, 27K)

153

HOUSING AUTHORITYOF WASHINGTON COUNTY

Board of Directors AgendaAugust 17, 2004

10:00 a.m.Huffman Auditorium

Housing Authority Board of Directors

Tom Brian, John Leeper, Dick Schouten, Roy RogersAndy Duyck, Sydney Sherwood, Carol Gakin

HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS 10

1. CONSENT AGENDA

Approval of Minutes - July 6, 2004 11

(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 5K)

a. Authorize Invitation to Bid for Public Housing Interior/ExteriorPainting Services(PDF, 6K) (RTF, 5K)

13

b. Section Eight Management Assessment Program (SEMAP)Certification for Fiscal Year 2003-2004(PDF, 11K) (RTF, 19K)

15


(2-Minute Opportunity)


(10-Minute Opportunity)

4. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNOUNCEMENTS

5. ADJOURNMENT

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSMeeting Calendar

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

Worksession - 8:30 a.m.Board Meeting - 10:00 a.m.

Tuesday, August 24, 2004

Worksession - 2:00 p.m.Board Meeting - 6:30 p.m.

Tuesday, September 7, 2004

Worksession - 8:30 a.m.Board Meeting - 10:00 a.m.

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Extended Worksession - 8:30 a.m.

Washington CountyAdministrative Office155 N. First Avenue, Suite 300Hillsboro, OR 97124

Phone: 503-846-8681Fax: 503-846-4545E-Mail: [email protected]