Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
WAS
PAUL
JESUS’ APOSTLE
? Dr. Muhammad Sulaiman
2
WAS PAUL JESUS’ APOSTLE?
One would logically think that the two billion Christians who
carry the name of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him, PBUH) are
following him. However, this is not true, because Christians do not
follow the teachings of Jesus. For instance, let's read what Jesus
said:
“The most important one, answered Jesus, is this: ‘Hear, O Israel:
The Lord our God, THE LORD IS ONE’.” (Mark, 12:29)
“Do not think that I HAVE COME TO ABOLISH THE LAW or the
Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.”
(Matthew, 5:17)
Do Christians apply these verses?
No. Today Christianity consider Jesus a divine Son of God and a
part of the Trinity (God, the Father; God, the Son; and God, the Holy
Ghost). In addition they have abrogated the law of God. Therefore,
Christians today are following Paul and not Jesus Christ.
In this booklet, we will provide clear evidence, from the Bible,
that Paul was not a true apostle of Jesus. In the beginning he
tortured and killed Jesus' followers. Then he claimed his
conversion to Christianity and appointed himself an apostle of
Jesus to destroy Christianity from within.
“It has always been my ambition to preach the gospel where Christ
was not known so that I would not be building on someone else’s
foundation” (Romans 15:20).
Jesus foretold and warned from false apostles like Paul. In
addition, he foretold the coming of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH),
the Spirit of the truth, to guide mankind to the Straight Path of God.
“Yet when the Spirit of Truth comes, he’ll guide you into all
truth” (John, 16:13).
4
WAS PAUL JESUS’
APOSTLE
? Dr. Muhammad Sulaiman
5
Copyright is reserved by the author, except for those who want to distribute this booklet for free.
May God reward all those who contributed to writing, revising, amending, translating and printing this booklet.
6
IN THE NAME OG GOD THE MOST GRACIOUS, THE MOST MERCIFUL
WAS PAUL JESUS’ APOSTLE?
Dr. Muhammad Solaiman
1. Introduction 6
2. Saul / Paul 7
3. Contradictions in the story of Paul's conversion 10
4. Was Paul recognised as one of the twelve apostles of Jesus? 11
5. Inconsistencies in Paul’s claimed apostleship 13
6. Questionable incidents in Paul's Apostleship 17
7. Why did Pauline Christianity prevail and spread rapidly among the Gentiles? 21 8. The role of Constantine and the Church in the propagation of Pauline Christianity 23
9. Jesus doctrine vs. Pauline doctrine 27
10. How to restore the original message of God 38
11. Concluding remarks 42
1. Introduction
There is today at least two billion Christian. Ironically, however, if
Jesus, peace be upon him, (1) returns back he would not recognise them as
his followers! He would say to them, "I do not know you, you just carry my
name. I told you 'If you love me, keep my commandments' (John, 14:15),
and yet you have followed the commandments of others".
Today’s Christians believe in the divinity of Jesus, as the son of God,
original sin and they have abrogated the law of God which they think Jesus
has emancipated them from. All these notions were actually introduced
years after Jesus by a Jew from Tarsus called Saul. After Jesus’ ascension to
Heaven, Saul claimed that he was converted to Christianity and changed his
name to Paul. He claimed to have had direct revelations from Jesus and
appointed himself an apostle of Jesus.
None of the above doctrines of Paul was preached by Jesus. On the
contrary, the Bible tells us that Jesus preached the Oneness of God and the
submission to His Law. Read, for example:
“The most important one answered Jesus, is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord
our God, the Lord is one’” (Mark, 12:29).
1. Muslims normally praise the prophets after mentioning their names. For the ease of reading the text by non-Muslims, I will refrain from doing so in the booklet. However, Muslims are required to say peace be upon him.
7
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have
not come to abolish them but to fulfil them” (Matthew, 5:17).
As we will see in this booklet, Paul cooperated with the pagan Roman
authorities, to torture Christians. He even superintended the killing of
Simon the first Christian martyr. When Paul found that the ruthless torture
of Christians was useless, he decided to use deception. He appointed
himself an apostle of Jesus and propagated a completely different religion
which could be called Pauline Christianity.
Though Paul’s odd doctrines were rejected by the true followers of Jesus
Christ, he found a foothold among the pagan Gentiles because they had no
idea about the scripture and he presented to them Jesus as a substitute for
their deities.
In addition and most importantly, Paul’s doctrines suited well the
powerful pagan ambitious Roman Emperor, Constantine, who was only
keen to rule a powerful unified Empire. Therefore, Constantine chose a
Church that unified his vast Empire based on the distorted Pauline
Christianity. The Church tortured and killed the true followers of Jesus
Christ and burnt their scribes.
Therefore, Christians have been misled to follow Paul instead of Jesus.
They do not even realise that the true message of Jesus has been abrogated
and replaced by the false doctrines of Paul which are continuously taught to
them by the Church.
You will find in this booklet amazing evidence that Paul was a false
apostle. We will clarify how Paul’s teachings have no roots in what Jesus
and all the prophets of God, like Noah, Abraham, Moses and Muhammad
(PBUT) have taught. All prophets of God preached the Oneness of God and
the commitment to his Law, which are the essences of the religion of Islam.
2. Saul / Paul Paul’s name was originally Saul. According to his Epistles and the Acts
(23:6) of the New Testament of the Bible, he was a Jew of the tribe of
Benjamin and from a long-established Pharisee family in Tarsus. He studied
in Jerusalem under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3), the leader of the Pharisees. The
Pharisees were a sect of Jews who preserved the Pharisaical oral law
in the form of the Talmud.
Paul was not a disciple of Jesus and he never met him. He also had not
any sort of direct connection to Jesus’ Apostles before his claimed
conversion to Christianity.
8
Figure 1: Paul was born around AD 4, converted to Christianity around AD 33 and died around AD 64. Although he was contemporary of Jesus, he never met him.
While Jesus is supposed to be the founder of Christianity, the Church
considers Paul to be the greatest interpreter of Jesus' mission and teachings.
Ironically, while in the New Testament, there are only four gospels of Jesus,
thre are thirteen Epistles attributed to Paul.
Paul shaped the doctrines of Christianity and introduced, in his Epistles,
what Jesus himself never did or said. He made of Jesus a deity to be
worshipped, abolished the Law he was sent to fulfil and made of his life and
death on the cross a mission of salvation.
2.1. Persecution and killing of Christians
After the mission of Jesus, Saul was one of the opponents who
enthusiastically persecuted Christians. Saul was acting in concert with the
high priest (Acts 9:2) as a sort of a policeman to torture and kill Christians.
“And Saul approved of their killing him (Stephen). On that day a great
persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the
apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria” (Acts 8:1).
"But Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the
Lord, went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues at
Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, men or women, he
might bring them bound to Jerusalem" (Acts 9:1-2).
2.2. Conversion to Christianity
Saul was entrusted by the high priest to travel to Damascus, which was
not under the Roman rule at the time, to arrest prominent members of the
Jerusalem Church.
9
On his way to Damascus, Paul experienced the vision of Jesus that
converted him from a persecutor to a believer. In Damascus, Acts 9 states
that he was healed of his blindness and baptised by Ananias. After learning
that there was a plot against his life, he fled and went to Arabia (II
Corinthians 11:32-33).
In Arabia, Apostle Paul claimed to be personally taught by Jesus Christ
for a span of 3 years. Paul did not discuss this event until he wrote the book
of Galatians in late spring of 53 A.D.
2.3. Paul's missionary campaigns Paul’s first missionary campaign, began after his conversion to
Christianity by 14 years. It is not known what happened during this time.
Paul journeyed on four trips to Asia Minor and Europe and wrote his Epistles
during his missionary trip (Figure 8).
2.4. The Opposition of the true followers of Jesus
Paul’s new doctrine was met with disapproval from the Jerusalem Church,
who considered the substitution of the notion of Jesus' atoning death for the
observance of the Torah as a lapse into paganism.
The rift between Pauline Christianity and Jesus’ Christianity became clear
after the Apostle Peter visited Paul in Antioch and became fully aware of the
corrupted Pauline Christianity (Galatians 2:11). Paul was then accused by
James of turning his back on the Law of God (Acts 21:21). This would be
obvious if we compare between what is stated by Paul and Matthew.
“Know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in
Jesus Christ (Galatians 2:16).
“For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father's glory with his angels,
and then he will reward each person according to what they have done”
(Matthew 16:27).
After Paul’s ideas were attacked in Jerusalem by Jesus’ real apostles (Acts
21:18-26), Paul defended himself, taunted the apostles and dropped his
contact with them (Acts 15:36-39; Galatians 2:9-14; I Corinthians 9:19-22).
2.5. The death of Paul
Although Paul is considered a cornerstone in the formulation of the
doctrine of today’s Christianity, the details about his death is not mentioned
in the New Testament. Isn’t that weird?
10
Figure 2: The Gospel of Thomas, which is a non-canonical sayings-gospel, does not directly point to Jesus' divinity, crucifixion or resurrection. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Thomas
It is commonly believed that in the second conference in Jerusalem, some
true Christians (Jewish Christians) considered his doctrine as a lapse into
paganism. Paul feared for his life and was rescued by the Roman police.
According to the Acts of Paul, which was written around 160 AD, and is
considered non-canonical (not recognised as part of the Bible), Paul
was condemned to death by decapitation in the reign of Nero (2).
3. Contradictions in the story of Paul’s conversion
The story of the conversion of Paul to Christianity is told in the Book of
Acts in the New Testament in three different ways.
"Now as he journeyed, he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from
heaven flashed around him. And he fell to the ground and heard a voice
saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?" And he said, "Who are
you, Lord?" And he said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting; but rise
and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do. The men who were
travelling with him stood speechless, hearing the voice but seeing no one"
(Acts 9:3-6).
"Now those who were with me saw the light but did not hear the voice of the
one who was speaking to me. … But since I could not see because of the
brightness of that light, I was led by the hand by those who were with me and
came into Damascus“ (Acts 22:9-11, NIV).
"At midday, O King, I saw on the way a light from heaven, brighter than the
sun, shining round me and those who journeyed with me. And when we had
all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew
language..." (Acts 26:13-14).
2. James, Montague Rhodes (1924). "The Acts of Paul". The Apocryphal New Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11
As noticed, there are three contradictory stories of the same incident in
the book of Acts.
1. While in the first verse, Paul and not the men travelling with him saw the
light, in the second and third verse both Paul and the men saw the light.
2. The bright light blinded Paul and not his witnesses who took him to
Damascus.
3. While in the first verse, both Paul and the men heard the voice of Jesus,
in the second and third verses only Paul heard the voice.
4. While in the first verse, only Paul fell on the ground, all of them fell on
the ground in the third verse.
It should also be mentioned that the story of Paul’s vision was told on his
authority without any known witnesses confirming it.
Interestingly, in spite of (a) Paul’s vision inconsistency, (b) the enmity of
Paul to Jesus and his followers and (c) the absence of know witnesses, the
Church accepted Paul's story.
Further more, this questionable vision was the turning point in the history
of Christianity, and today’s Christianity is based on Paul’s teachings which as
we will see contradict with what Jesus and his twelve apostles preached.
4. Was Paul recognised as one of the twelve apostles of Jesus?
Paul claimed that he was converted to Christianity in a vision during his
journey to Damascus (Romans 1:1). He specifically claimed to have received
his Gospel through revelations from Jesus Christ (Galatians 1:12) and
referred to himself as the Apostle to the Gentiles (Romans 11:13, Galatians
2:8). However, it is interesting to know that the only person to say that Paul is
a true Apostle of Jesu, in the entire New Testament, is Paul himself!
According to the Bible, Jesus appointed twelve apostles (Mark 3:16-19).
Now, one might imagine that after Judas' betrayal of Jesus and his death, Paul
replaced him. However, the four canonical gospels, which were written after
the Epistles of Paul (Table 1), never mention anything about Paul. In
addition, according to Acts, which was written by his friend Luke, the
disciples casted lots, and the lot fell to Matthias who became a replacement
for Judas and was added to the eleven apostles (Acts 1:26).
12
Figure 3: The Gospel of Barnabas considered Paul an impostor apostle.
Interestingly, although, the name Paul appears in 128 verses of the book
of Acts; the only single verse in which Paul is referred to as an apostle is
14:14. However, in this verse, Luke addressed both Paul and Barnabas as
apostles. However, since Barnabas was just a disciple and not one of the
twelve apostles of Jesus, Luke, therefore, in this verse was considering Paul
as a disciple like Barnabas. Similarly, in 1 Thessalonians (2:6), Paul
considered Silas, who was not one of the twelve Apostles, and himself
apostles.
Therefore, it may be concluded that right from the beginning, Paul was
not really accepted as a real apostle of Jesus, but he was rather considered,
like many others, as a sort of a delegate or disciple of Jesus. However, when
Paul’s lies were later discovered he lost his credibility, and James frankly
ordered him to keep the law of God and therefore, Paul was obliged to
defend himself.
“(James ordering Paul) Walk orderly and keep the law” (Acts 21:24).
"This you know, that all those in Asia have turned away from me”
(2Timothy 1:15).
“I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie” (Galatians
1:20).
“And among the people is he who argues about God without knowledge, or
guidance, or an enlightening scripture. Turning aside in contempt, to lead
away from the path of God” (Qur’an 22:8-9).
13
5. Inconsistencies in Paul’s claims of Apostleship If we carefully read the Epistles of Paul, we will discover that they are
full of inconsistencies, lies, contradictions and bad behaviour which does not
fit with apostleship.
5.1. Where did Paul go after his conversion?
According to Acts (9: 17), he met first Ananias of Damascus and then the
apostles in Jerusalem (Acts 9: 27).
“Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you
came, has sent me (Ananias) that you may receive your sight and be filled
with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 9:17).
“But Barnabas took him and brought him to the Apostles. And he declared to
them how he had seen the Lord on the road” (Acts 9:27).
On the contrary, in Galatians (1:17), after his vision, he went into the
desert of Arabia without seeking instructions and then he returned to
Damascus.
“I did not go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was,
but I went into Arabia. Later I returned to Damascus” (Galatians, 1:17).
5.2. Did Paul fear the Jews or King Aretas in Damascus?
According to Paul in II Corinthians (11:32-33), after his conversion, he
joined the Christians of Damascus, but soon he had to flee from Damascus to
escape the officers of King Aretas. However, on the contrary in Acts (9:22-
25), it was claimed that his persecutors were the Jews and not King Aretas’
officers.
5.3. Two examples of Paul's lies
5.3.1. His lies about the Council of Jerusalem: According to the Acts, in the
Council of Jerusalem, James decreed that the Gentiles must abstain from four
points.
“… To keep away from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from anything
strangled, and from sexual immorality" (Acts 15: 29).
However, Paul wrote to the Galatian Church claiming that: “All they
asked was that we should continue to remember the poor” (Galatians 2:10).
5.3.2. His lies to the High Priest: During his last visit to Jerusalem, Paul was
arrested in the Temple and he was rescued from the Jews by the Romans.
14
Figure 4: The place where Paul is believed to have escaped from persecution in
Damascus (left) and the process of beheading Paul (right).
On the following day, he was taken to Ananias the High Priest and the
Sanhedrin to defend himself.
“...the Jews from Asia, seeing him in the temple, stirred up the whole crowd
and laid hands on him, crying out, ‘Men of Israel, help! This is the man who
teaches all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this
place’..." (Acts 21:27-28).
When he perceived the presence of Sadducees and Pharisees in the
Sanhedrin, he claimed another story:
"Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; concerning the
hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!" And when he had said
this, a dissension arose between the Pharisees and the Sadducees; and the
assembly was divided” (Acts 23:6-7).
Isn’t the claim that he was being judged on the issue of the resurrection of
the dead a lie?
Interestingly, Paul claimed earlier that he was willing to die in Jerusalem
for what he believed in.
“For I am ready not only to be bound, but also to die at Jerusalem for the
name of the Lord Jesus" (Acts 21:12, 13).
Are Apostles supposed to lie and deny their doctrines or would they rather
remain steadfast and die for their cause?
5.4. Does falsehood enhance God’s truthfulness?!
“Someone might argue, ‘If my falsehood enhances God's truthfulness and so
increases his glory, why am I still condemned as a sinner’?” (Romans 3:7).
Would truthfulness be enhanced by falsehood?
15
“Cursed be he that does the work of the LORD deceitfully” (Jeremiah
48:10).
5.5. Would Jesus inspire false information to Paul?
“By this, we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and
remain until the coming of the Lord … For the Lord, Himself will descend
from heaven with a shout… Then we who are alive and remain shall be
caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and
thus we shall always be with the Lord” (1 Thessalonians 4:15-17).
This verse tells that Jesus was due to return at any minute within Paul’s
own lifetime.
Why didn’t that happen? Why did Jesus, who is claimed to be divine, reveal
to his apostle Paul something wrong?
5.6. Was Paul a descendant of Benjamin?
“For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of
Benjamin” (Romans 11:1).
This account is, however, subject to doubt, since the tribe of Benjamin
ceased to exist in 539 BCE, when the Babylonian captivity ended the
distinction between Benjamin and Judah in favour of a common identity
as Israel (3).
It seems that Paul was lying to increase his assets in the eyes of the
Gentiles!
5.7. Is hypocrisy an act of apostleship?
“I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. To the
Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law, I became
like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win
those under the law. To those not having the law, I became like one not
having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s
law), so as to win those not having the law” (1 Corinthians 9:20-21).
Isn’t the above statement a clear confession of Paul’s hypocrisy?
Paul’s hypocrisy was practically demonstrated when he circumcised
Timothy (Acts 16:3), whose mother was a Jew and objected to circumcise
Titus (Galatians 2:3-5) and the Galatians (Galatians 5:2), who were Gentiles.
3. http://ancienthistory.about.com/od/israeljudaea/f/UnitedMonarchy.htm.
16
Figure 5: A Mithraic medallion of bronze recovered from Tarsus, Cilicia,
which is the hometown of Apostle Paul.
Christian scholars have explained that on the basis that Timothy was going to
accompany Paul while he was addressing the Jews. Wasn’t then the
circumcision of Timothy hypocrisy to win the Jews?
5.8. Why would Paul preach where Christ is not known?
“It has always been my ambition to preach the Gospel where Christ was not
known, so that I would not be building on someone else’s foundation”
(Romans 15:20).
Why was Paul's ambition to preach where Christ was not known and why
did he avoid the building on someone else’s foundation?
Paul knew that if the Gentiles happened to know the true teachings of
Jesus, through one of his disciples, they would reject his teachings. This
explains why Paul's falsehood was discovered and rejected by the Ephesians
who knew about Jesus from the Apostle John (Revelation 2:2, See also 6.11).
5.9. Paul’s contradictions about the law?
“But now we are released from the law... we serve not under the old written
code, but under the new life of the Spirit” (Romans 7:6).
“Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith? Not at all! Rather, we uphold the
law” (Romans 3:31).
“Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's
commands is what counts” (1 Corinthians 7:19).
“Though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law” (1
Corinthians 9: 21, NRSV).
“So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God’s law, but in my sinful
nature a slave to the law of sin” (Romans 7:25).
Aren’t Paul’s statements about the Law contradictory?
17
5.10. Is robbery, one of the acts of the apostles?
“I robbed other churches ... to do you service” (2 Corinthians 11:8).
Some scholars explained “robbed other churches” by claiming that Paul
had a support or wages for Corinth from other rich churches, like Philippi,
because he was also labouring for them.
However, regardless of what Paul meant, he mentioned the term
robbery and not wages. Does it befit an Apostle to say so?
5.11. Paul’s moral behaviour
“I think that I am not in the least inferior to these super-apostles” (2
Corinthians, 11:5).
"But from those who seemed to be something - whatever they were, it makes
no difference to me; God shows personal favouritism to no man- for those
who seemed to be something added nothing to me” (Galatians 2:6).
"More than that, I also consider everything to be a loss in view of the
surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. Because of him I have
suffered the loss of all things and consider them as dung (σκύβαλον), so that
I may gain Christ” (Philippians 3:8).
“Be that as it may, I have not been a burden to you. Yet, crafty fellow that I
am, I caught you by trickery” (2 Corinthians 12:16).
“What I am saying, I say not with the Lord’s authority but as a fool in
boastful confidence. Since many of you boast, I too will boast” (2 Corinthians
11:17-18).
Does it befit an apostle to be sarcastic about Jesus’ true Apostles, to use
vulgar terms, and to be arrogant, tricky, fool and boastful?
6. Questionable incidents in Paul's Apostleship
6.1. According to Paul, he was a Pharisee who received his education from the
prominent Rabbi Gamaliel (Act 22:3). How could a prominent Pharisee,
scrap the prohibitions of the Sabbath and disregard his dietary regulations,
circumcision and the Law of God? Isn’t it also weird for a Pharisee who
was expecting a human Jewish Messiah, to worship this Messiah as the
pagans used to do?
18
Jesus (A) and Mithras (B)
riding sun chariots. From the left Jesus, the sun gods Sol and Mithras with sun discs on their heads.
Mary and Jesus with the sun. Pope Francis with a sun disc.
Figure 6: To satisfy Emperor Constantine, the sun worshipper, the Church allowed sun-worship practices and symbols to infiltrate into Christianity.
“Do not bow down to the sun, nor to the moon, but bow down to God, Who created
them both, if it is Him that you serve.” (Qur’an 41: 37)
6.2. Paul was acting in concert with the High Priest as a sort of a policeman to
arrest and torture Christians. The High Priest even entrusted Paul to travel
to Damascus, which was not under the Roman rule to arrest members of
the Jerusalem Church.
The High Priest was the leader of the Sadducees. The Sadducees were a
type of heretical Jews cooperating with the Romans to prevent any
political threat to their regime. Sadducees and Pharisees were mortal
enemies (4). How would a Sadducee High Priest trust Paul, the
Pharisee?
6.3. The four canonical gospels were written after the Epistles of Paul (Table
1). Nonetheless, they never mention anything about Paul, although he was
supposed to be the most prominent Apostle and interpreter of Jesus!
6.4. Paul must have studied under Gamaliel, the leader of the Pharisees in
Jerusalem, in the Hebrew language (Acts, 22:3). Why then his scriptural
references were taken from the Greek translation of the Jewish
scripture?
4. http://www.whatchristianswanttoknow.com/who-were-the-pharisees-and-sadducees-a-bible-study/
A
B
19
6.5. Paul (Saul) was a contemporary of Jesus in time and place, yet he never
met him! If the intention of Jesus, who is supposed to be God and the Son
of God, was to appoint Paul as an apostle, why didn’t he do so in his
lifetime instead of appointing him under ambiguous circumstnces after
his ascension?
6.6. After his claimed conversion to Christianity and his claims to receive
direct revelations from Jesus, Paul would logically join the other apostles
of Jesus. However, instead, Paul avoided them and went to Arabia to stay
for three years. Why did Paul avoid the Apostles and why he later had
conflicts with them? (Galatians 1:6; Galatians 2:11-21; 2 Corinthians 11:
4-5).
"… I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus. Then
after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Cephas
and stayed with him fifteen days” (Galatians 1:17-18).
“Fourteen years later I went up again to Jerusalem” (Galatians 2:1).
6.7. Although Saul was born in Tarsus (Acts, 9:11), he never mentioned it in
his Epistles. Tarsus was mentioned only once in the Acts written by Luke.
Why wasn’t Tarsus mentioned in Paul’s Epistles?
Well, Tarsus was a major Mithraic centre, in which Mithraism was
practised as early as 67 BCE. Therefore, it seems that Paul tried to avoid
drawing the attention to the influence of Mithraism on his version of
Christianity. For example, according to pagan Mithraism, eternal life is
gained by the transformation of Mithras into a Bull before the eating of his
flesh and blood. This parallels the eating and drinking of Jesus’ flesh and
blood to wash away sin and gain eternal life (5) (Figure 7).
6.8. Paul's conversion was a couple of years after Jesus ascension. However, he
started his first missionary journey between 47 and 50 AD. What did Paul
do during all these lagging years?
6.9. According to Paul’s claims, he was an apostle of Jesus and he received
revelations from him. However, Jesus’ teachings and words are never
found in Paul’s writings except for some unspecific phrases such as a
servant of Jesus Christ; through Jesus; in Jesus; by Jesus; by a revelation
of Jesus, etc. These phrases were used to ascertain his false doctrines and
imply that he received ‘revelations’ from him.
7.
5. http://paulproblem.faithweb.com/relationship_high_priest_proves_sadducee.htm
20
From the left, the Eucharist of Mithras, Dionysus and Jesus.
Figure 7: The Eucharist (Holy Communion, the Lord's Supper) is a pagan practice
adopted by almost all Churches like the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Catholics,
Anglicans, Presbyterians, and Lutherans.
If Paul never quoted Jesus, what is the ground for accepting him as his
Apostle?
6.10. Paul had a weird connection with the Romans. Before his conversion, the
High Priest, concerted with him in the arrest, torture and killing of
Christians, because they were a threat to the Roman Empire. However,
after his conversion, although he claimed to preach the wealth of Jesus'
Christianity, he moved freely and safely along the Roman Empire in his
missionary trips.
Why Paul and his Gentile followers were not considered as a threat to
the Roman Empire?
6.11. Jesus commended the Ephesian Church in Asia for rejecting liar apostles.
"I know your works, your labour, and your patience, and that you cannot
bear those who are evil. And you have tested those who say they are
apostles and are not, and have found them liars" (Revelation 2:2).
The Ephesians of Asia Minor knew the above commendment of Jesus
through a letter from Apostle John. Interestingly, the Ephesians rejected
Paul.
"This you know, that all those in Asia have turned away from me”
(2Timothy 1:15).
Doesn’t the Ephesians' rejection of Paul as an Apostles imply that he is
a false apostle?
21
7. Why did Pauline Christianity prevail and spread rapidly among the Gentiles?
Paul succeeded to spread his version of Christianity because he was a genius
deceiver who coloured himself with all colours. The following are some of his
tactics to deceive both the Gentiles, and the true followers of Jesus.
7.1. The motivating story of his conversion
Luke in Acts presented a motivating story of Paul’s vision in which he
addressed Jesus as Lord and Jesus requested him to stop his persecution. For
some Gentiles, this story was motivating as it paralleled the mythology of
their god Dionysus, who also complained to the ruler (Pentheus) about his
persecution.
“As Saul travelled along and was approaching Damascus, a light from
heaven suddenly flashed around him. He dropped to the ground and heard a
voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul! Why are you persecuting me? He asked,
‘Who are you, Lord?’ The voice said, ‘I’m Jesus, whom you are persecuting’”
(Acts 9:3-6).
7.2. Paul put himself at a higher rank than the Apostles
By claiming that he received revelations directly from Jesus after his
ascension, Paul put himself higher than the true Apostles.
“I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by
revelation from Jesus Christ” (Galatians 1:12).
7.3. Paul presented Jesus as a better substitute for the pagans deities
The knowledge of the philosophical language of his day, and his
knowledge of the Hellenistic religious culture and the ancient Egyptian
religions enabled Paul to portray Jesus Christ as a popular mythological figure
suiting the diverse Gentile communities of the Roman Empire.
Paul realised that the violent deaths of Osiris, Attis, Adonis, and Dionysus
made them deities, and therefore he substituted the stories of these deities with
the story of the violent death of Jesus on the cross. He also used the Last
Supper (1Corinthians 11:17–34), to initiate the Eucharist, echoing the
communion meal of Mithraism and Dionysus (Figure 7).
22
Figure 8: Paul had four missionary journeys. The book of Acts mentions 57 cities and places in his first three journeys.
In addition, Paul's "salvation story of Jesus" was more appealing to pagans
than their own salvation stories because it would attach them to the Divine
Hebrew Scriptures.
7.4. Paul postponed his conflicts with the Apostles
As mentioned before, after his claimed conversion and the claimed direct
revelations from Jesus, supposedly, the most logical thing to do was to return
to Jerusalem and consult with the twelve Apostles. However, he avoided them
and went to Arabia and stayed for three years (Galatians 1:17-18). It was
round the middle of the first century when the Apostle Peter visited Paul in
Antioch and became aware of Paul's views. From then a serious rift began
between Paul and the Apostles. James even accused Paul in Jerusalem of
teaching Jews "to turn their backs on Moses" (Acts 21:21).
7.5. Paul succeeded to gaining the Gentiles’ sympathy
“Are they (the twelve Apostles) Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelites? So am
I. Are they descendants of Abraham? So am I. Are they servants of Christ?—I
speak as if insane—I more so; in far more labours, in far more
imprisonments, beaten times without number, often in danger of death. Five
times I received from the Jews thirty-nine lashes. Three times I was beaten
with rods, once I was stoned; three times I was shipwrecked, a night and a
day I have spent in the deep. I have been on frequent journeys, in dangers
from rivers, dangers from robbers, dangers from my countrymen, dangers
23
from the Gentiles, dangers in the city, dangers in the wilderness, dangers on
the sea, dangers among false brethren; I have been in labour and hardship,
through many sleepless nights, in hunger and thirst, often without food, in
cold and exposure. Apart from such external things, there is the daily pressure
on me of concern for all the churches. Who is weak without my being weak?
Who is led into sin without my intense concern?” (2 Corinthians 11: 22-29).
“But I do not think I am in the least inferior to those ‘super-apostles’.” (2
Corinthians 11: 5)
7.6. Paul actively moved on missionary trips
Unlike the Twelve Apostles (the Eleven plus Matthias), who stayed in
Jerusalem for yeaers away from the threats of the Romans, Paul extensively
travelled during his four missionary journeys, as detailed in the Book of Acts
(Figure 7). He traveled more than 10,000 miles to various regions while he
was wroting his Epistles and converting a large number of Gentiles.
7.7. Paul’s cleverness in presenting his forged mythology
No one denies that Paul explained his doctrines repeatedly and clearly and
He portrayed Jesus as a popular mythological figure suiting well the diverse
Gentile communities of the Roman Empire.
7.8. Pauline Christianity was adopted by Constantine
This is actually the most important factor in the wide spread of Pauline
Christianity. Constantine I, the Roman Emperor, was inclined to Pauline
Christianity. He appointed a Church which made a legend of Paul and
propagated and enforced his distorted version of Christianity.
8. The role of Constantine and the Church in the propagation of Pauline Christianity
8.1. Constantine’s Conversion to Christianity
The Roman Emperor Constantine was a sun worshiper. In AD 311,
Constantine with 40,000 soldiers rode toward Rome to confront Maxentius.
Constantine claimed to have had a vision of a bright cross with the words ‘by
this sign conquer.’ When he awoke next morning, he ordered his soldiers to
mark their shields with the cross. After his victory, Constantine claimed his
conversion to Christianity in AD 312.
24
Figure 9: After his claimed conversion to Christianity, Emperor Constantine put the
images of the sun god Sol on his coins (A), and his Arch of Victory in Rome (B). He
also superintended the burning of some of the records of Jesus’ followers (C).
8.2. Was Constantine a real Christian?
The Roman Emperor, Constantine, was a sun worshiper. However, after
his claimed conversion to Christianity and according to the custom in Rome,
Constantine became the Head of the Church (the Pontiff Maximus).
Although Constantine is considered a great saint by both Eastern
Orthodox and Byzantine Catholics, you might be shocked to know the
following facts about Constantine:
1. He was baptised on his deathbed in AD 337 (i.e. 25 years after his
conversion).
2. After his conversion, he did not make Christianity the state religion of
Rome and pagan religions continued to celebrate their festivals.
3. He continued to display sun gods like Sol Invictus on coins till AD 324
(Figure 5). Sol driving the sun chariot was also depicted on the east end of
his Arch of Victory erected in AD 315.
4. He substituted the Sabbath (Saturday) with Sunday as the day of worship
throughout the Roman Empire. Sunday was the day dedicated to
honouring the sun god Sol Invictus.
A
B
C
25
5. He substituted the Passover, observed by Jesus (Matthew 26:2; Luke 22:8)
with Easter, which is a pagan festival of fertility named after the
Babylonian Goddess Ishtar (6).
6. He killed both his eldest son Crispus and his wife Fausta without a trial,
and deleted their names from all official documents across the empire.
8.3. The Council of Nicaea
Constantine noticed that there were disputes and little agreement amongst
Christians about the beliefs, teachings, the nature of Jesus and the scriptures.
As a smart politician, he realised that these disagreements could threaten the
unity of his Empire. Therefore, Constantine called for the Council of Nicaea
in 325, and invited bishops from around the Empire to work out an official
doctrine and provide the basis for a unified Church. The Council was attended
by more than 250 bishops.
According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica: “Constantine himself
presided, actively guiding the discussions, and personally proposed … the
crucial formula expressing the relation of Christ to God in the creed issued by
the council … Overawed by the emperor, the bishops, with two exceptions
only, signed the creed, many of them much against their inclination” (1971
edition, Vol. 6, ‘Constantine’, p. 386).
To satisfy Constantine, who was inclined to the divinity of Jesus, the
bishops endorsed the divinity of Jesus in the Nicaean Creed, though this
opinion was held by only a minority of the attendants. Nonetheless, the
bishops overwhelmingly voted for the deification and eternal life of Jesus.
8.4. Shaping a new Christianity to suit Constantine
After the Council of Nicaea and voting for the divinity of Jesus Christ, as
preached by Paul, a marriage between Church and the State took place.
Constantine’s Church agreed to substitute the Sabbath with Sunday, the
day of the sun god Sol. The birthdate of Jesus became of December 25, which
is the date of birth of the popular pagan gods in the Roman Empire, Mithras
and Sol. In addition, to attract pagans to Christianity, the Church portrayed
Jesus, in every possible way, like the pagan sun gods. For instance, Jesus was
portrayed in a sun chariot like Helios and with sun discs on his head like Sol,
Helios and Mithras (Figure 6).
6. From the Letter of the Emperor to all those not present at the Council, found in Eusebius, Life of Constantine, 3: 18-20.
26
The Church thought that by compromising with pagans it would attract
them to Christianity. However by doing so, the true message of Jesus was lost.
To avoid any objection, Constantine’s Church executed Jesus’ true followers
for heresy and destroyed their scripts.
8.5. Constantine’s Church Compiled a Bible compatible with Pauline Christianity
To make sure that the Bible would be compatible with the Pauline
Christianity, Constantine’s Church intentionally compiled at least 13 of Paul’s
Epistles among the 27 books of the New Testament. It also chose the four
Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John which were written between AD
65 and 110 to make sure that their writers were influenced by Paul’s Epistles
which were written earlier, between 50 and 67 AD (Figure 8). The Book of
Acts written by Paul’s friend Luke was also included. Half of this deals with
Paul, who is mentioned 128 times.
Although all possible means were used by the Church to confiscate and
burn all other records or Gospels, still every now and then, Gospels hidden in
Table 1: Approximate dates of the conversion of Paul, the Ascension
of Jesus and the writing of Paul’s Epistles and the four Gospels.
The incident Approximate Time
Ascension of Jesus AD 30-33
Paul’s conversion AD 31-36
Writing of Paul’s Epistles AD 52-67
Writing of Mark's Gospel AD 68-73
Writing of Matthew's Gospel AD 70-100
Writing of Luke's Gospel AD 80-100
Writing of John's Gospel AD 90-100
caves in clay pots are discovered. These unearthed gospels are usually
different and contradictory to the four canonical Gospels (Figures 2 and 3).
Interestingly, the Epistle of James which is included in the Bible, makes
no reference to the death, resurrection, or divinity of Jesus, and Apostle
Barnabas described Paul as an imposter in his Gospel (Fig. 3), However, the
Church, has considered it as a non-canonical (7).
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistle_of_James
27
The theologians of the Church are careful to always claim that God
inspired the writing of the Gospels and superintended and preserved them.
However, this is very unlikely because the Gospels are full of contradictions
(See for example Table 2). Would God ever inspire contradictions?
Contradictions also suggest that the writers of the four canonical Gospels
were not disciples of Jesus, otherwise, why would they contradict one
another? Interestingly, the writers of the Gospels did not write in the Aramaic
language of Jesus, and they used the Koine Greek language of Paul. There has
been a broad consensus among scholars that the Gospels were not written by
the people whose names are attached to them (8).
Like all prophets of God, Jesus preached Islam. In other words, he
preached the oneness of God and emphasised the commitment to His
commandments. On the contrary, Paul’s doctrine was contradictory to both
the Old Testament and what Jesus taught in the Gospels. These doctrines are
based on:
9. Jesus' doctrine vs. Pauline doctrine 1) The divinity of Jesus as God and the incarnate Son of God.
2) Salvation through faith in Jesus and not the works of God’s Law.
3) The concept of the original sin and the atonement of sins through the
suffering and death of Jesus.
As we will see in the next sections, these doctrines are incompatible with
the teachings of Jesus and all the other prophets of God (PBUT).
9.1. Evidence that Jesus is not divine
9.1.1. Jesus never preached his divinity
Christian scholars have claimed that some verses in the Gospels imply the
divinity and eternity of Jesus.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being
through Him, and apart from Him, nothing came into being that has come into
being” (John 1:1-3).
8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament
28
“And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you
before the world began.” (John 17:5)
“I and the Father are one” (John 10:30).
The notion of the first verses (1:1-3) was stated by John and not by Jesus.
It is debatable wheather John was an apostle or an eyewitness of Jesus. This
Gospel was written about 70 years after Jesus and there is a possibility that the
writer was influenced by the notions of Paul’s Epistles, which preceded his
Gospel. On the other hand, the original writings of John are not available, and
therefore, this verse might have been inserted since John, in other verses in his
Gospel, explicitly stated that God is one God (5:44 and 17:3).
“Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus
Christ, whom you have sent”(John 17:3).
The second verse could mean that God glorified Jesus as He did with all
His prophets (PBUT) when He planned to create mankind and the world.
The third verse (John, 10:30) might imply that Jesus is one in purpose with
God because he preached God’s Straight Path. That is why Jesus said, “As
You, Father, are in me, and I in You; that they also may be one in us” (John
17:21). Definitely, “one" in this verse means ‘one in purpose’.
Table 2: There are staggering differences and contradictions in the Bible. The
following are contradictions on just the occasion of Jesus’ resurrection.
Incidence Mark Matthew Luke John
Who first saw the risen Jesus and where?
Mary Magdalene (16:9). No location
Mary Magdalene and another Mary. At the tomb (28:1-9)
Cleopas and an unnamed man. Near Emmaus (24:13-18)
Mary Magdalene.
At the tomb (20:10-14)
Who arrived first to the empty tomb?
Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother and Salome (15:5)
Mary Magdalene and another Mary. (28:1)
Mary Magdalene, Mary mother of James, Joanna and others (24:10)
Mary Magdalene (20:1)
What did they see?
A young man dressed in a white robe (16:5)
An angel (28:2) Two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning (24:4)
Two angels in white (20:12)
What was their reaction?
They were astonished and afraid, so they kept quiet (16:8)
They ran away filled with joy (28:8)
They left and told the disciples (24:9)
Mary Magdalene told the disciples the body was stolen (20:1-2)
29
9.1.2. “The Father is greater than I”
“I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I” (John 14:28).
“Why do you call me good? No one is good, except God alone” (Mark
10:18).
My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch
them out of my Father's hand (John 10:29).
“And (Jesus said) indeed, God is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him.
That is a straight path” (Qur’an, 19: 36).
Is there a greater God and does God have a Lord?
9.1.3. Jesus lacked knowledge and authority
“But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor
the Son, but only the Father” (Mark 13:32).
“For I [Jesus] have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent
me gave me command, what I should say and what I should speak” (John
12:49).
“By myself, I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgement is just,
for I seek not to please myself but Him Who sent me” (John 5:30).
If Jesus was divine, why did he lack both knowledge and authority?
“Is there of your claimed partners of God, one who guides to the truth? Say:
It is God Who guides to the truth. Is then He Who guides to the truth more
worthy to be followed, or he who finds no guidance unless he is guided?”
(Qur’an 10:35).
9.1.4. Jesus was a prophet
Jesus, like all prophets, was sent by God to guide people to His Straight
Path. Therefore, he was recognised as a prophet of God by people in his time.
“Jesus said to them, ‘A prophet is not without honour except in his hometown
and in his own household’” (Matthew 13:57).
“And the crowds said, ‘This is the Prophet Jesus, from Nazareth of Galilee’”
(Matthew 21:11).
“And We sent, following in their footsteps, Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming
that which came before him in the Torah; and We gave him the Gospel, in
30
Figure 10: Idolatry practices were introduced into Christianity by the Church to
attract pagan Gentiles.
“Do not become corrupt and make for yourselves an idol, an image of any shape, whether formed like a man or a woman” (Deuteronomy 4:16).
which was guidance and light and confirming that which preceded it of the
Torah as guidance and instruction for the righteous” (Qur’an 5:46).
9.1.5. Jesus was a servant and a messenger of God
“The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified
His servant Jesus” (Acts, 3:13).
“I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a
messenger greater than the One who sent him” (John 13:16).
“Now this is eternal life: that they know You, the only true God, and Jesus
Christ, whom You have sent” (John 17:3).
“These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father Who sent
me” (John 14:24).
“Here is my servant (Jesus) whom I have chosen” (Matthew 12:18).
Would God choose Himself or His eternal Son as a servant, or, logically, He
chooses His prophets or messenger to be His servants?
“The Messiah, the son of Mary, was no more than a messenger; many
messengers had already passed away before him. His mother was a truthful
woman” (Qur’an 5:75).
9.1.6. Jesus did his miracles by the Will of God
Jesus admitted that he was capable of doing miracles by the help of God
and not because he was divine. This was recognised by people who attended
him. It should be mentioned that Jesus in Mark (8:22-26) was not able to heal
31
a blind man in his first attempt. Would God or a son of God fail to heal a
blind man from the first attempt?
“Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles,
wonders, and signs, which God did among you through him, as you
yourselves know” (Acts 2:22).
“But if I drive out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has
come upon you” (Luke 11:20).
“And He will teach him writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel
and [make him] a messenger to the Children of Israel, [who will say],
‘Indeed, I have come to you with a sign from your Lord in that I design for
you from clay like the form of a bird, then I breathe into it and it becomes a
bird by permission of God. And I cure the blind and the leper, and I give life
to the dead - by permission of God. And I inform you of what you eat and what
you store in your houses. Indeed, in that is a sign for you, if you are
believers’” (Qur’an 3:48-49).
9.1.7. The term ‘son’ of God is a metaphor
The term son of God, in the Bible, is used as a metaphor for prophets and
even anyone who is righteous. Therefore, there are several sons of God in the
Bible. In the following two verses, God considered David His son. Did his
followers consider him a divine son of God?
“I will proclaim the LORD's decree: He said to me, ‘You (David) are my son;
today I have become your father’” (Psalms 2:7).
“I will be his Father, and he shall be my son” (1 Chronicles 17:13).
Jesus clearly stated that God is his God and the God of his followers, and
God is his Father and the Father of his followers.
“I'm ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God”
(John 20:17).
How could Jesus as a son of God and God have a God, and why were his
followers not considered divine though God is their father?
“And the Christians say: ‘the Messiah (Christ) is the son of God.’ That is
what they say with their mouths, imitating the sayings of the former
unbelievers” (Qur’an 9:30).
“And they say, ‘The Most Merciful has begotten a son’. You have come up
with something monstrous. At which the heavens almost rupture, and the earth
splits, and the mountains fall and crumble because they attribute a son to the
Most Merciful. It is not fitting for the Most Merciful to have a son. There is
32
The Pope Francis with the
crosses of Nimrod.
Ancient Egyptian Ankh cross (left) in the
architectures of Coptic Egyptian Churches.
Ancient Egyptian
cross. Assyrian cross,
6000 B.C. Prehistoric German
Cross. Buddha with
crosses.
Figure 11: To attract pagans, the Church adopted their cross.
none in the heavens and the earth but will come to the Most Merciful as a
servant” (Qur’an 19:88-93).
9.2. The freedom from the Law of God Paul claimed that Christ has set the Christians free from the Law of God.
He even considered both the Law of God and Jesus to be curses.
“For sin will have no mastery over you, because you are not under law but
under grace” (Romans 6:14).
“Because through Jesus Christ the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you
free from the law of sin and death” (Romans 8:2).
“Therefore, let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to
maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and
of faith toward God” (Hebrews 6:1).
“All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written:
‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the
Book of the Law’” (Galatians 3:10).
33
“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us,
for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who is hanged on a tree’” (Galatians
3:13).
On the contrary to what was preached by Paul, the submission and application
of the Law of God have been highly important right from the time of the
creation of Adam and Eve, when God commanded them not to eat from a
certain forbidden tree.
To make sure that mankind would be committed to His Law, God sent a
succession of prophets who guided their people to the Law of God and
commanded them to obey and follow it. There are several verses in the Bible
that emphasise the importance of the law of God.
“It pleased the Lord for the sake of his righteousness to make His Law great
and glorious” (Isaiah 42:21).
“And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the Law to
fail” (Luke 16:17).
“I tell you the truth: until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter,
not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until
everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:18).
“Not all of those who call me ‘Lord’ will enter the kingdom of God, but only
the one who does the Will of my Father in heaven” (Matthew 7:21).
It is not enough to know the law if you do not apply it. That is why Jesus
was angry with the scribes and Pharisees because they knew the Law of God
and they did not apply it. Jesus considered that to be hypocrisy.
Was there any point in blaming the scribes and the Pharisees for their
hypocrisy regarding the Law, if Jesus’ mission was to exempt them from it?
“You also outwardly appear righteous to men, but inside you are full of
hypocrisy and lawlessness” (Matthew 23:25-28).
Jesus Christ even warned his followers of the curse that falls on those who
do not apply the Law of God.
“No! But this mob that knows nothing of the law - there is a curse on them”
(John 7:49).
“Cursed be anyone who does not confirm the words of this law by doing them.
And all the people shall say, Amen” (Deuteronomy 27:26).
34
Is it fair according to original sin?
- To be punished for a crime committed by someone else.
- To blame Eve for tempting Adam which is the basis for bias against women.
- To unfairly punish unbaptized babies.
Figure 13: original sin violates the love of God.
“The example of those who were entrusted with the Torah, but then failed to
uphold it, is like the donkey carrying works of literature. Miserable is the
example of the people who denounce God’s revelations. God does not guide
the wrongdoing people” (Qur’an 62:5).
If Paul was a real apostle of Jesus would he follow the law of God or
abrogate it?
9.3. Original sin
According to Paul, original sin stems from Adam and Eve's disobedience
to God when they both ate the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. Paul also
assumed that the only way to receive God's grace is first to believe that Jesus
Christ died on the cross to redeem our sins.
“For as by one man’s (Adam’s) disobedience many were made sinners, so by
one man’s (Jesus’) obedience many will be made righteous” (Romans 5:19).
“For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ
Jesus our Lord” (Romans 6:23).
After the Church of Constantine adopted Pauline Christianity, it
propagated the doctrine of original sin. The mainstream Churches today
believe in original sin as based on the writings of St Augustine of Hippo (354-
430). The adoption of Augustine’s ideas of the doctrine of original sin in
Christian orthodoxy came after decades of disputes. According to Augustine,
babies inherit Adam and Eve’s original sin and if they die unbaptized they go
to Hell.
35
9.3.1. Original sin contradicts with the Old Testament
Contrary to Paul’s assumption of the inheritance of original sin, the Old
Testament teaches that each human is responsible for his own sins and God is
forgiving and merciful.
“The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the
father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the
righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon
himself” (Ezekiel, 18:20).
“I have swept away your offenses like a cloud, your sins like the morning mist.
Return to me, for I have redeemed you” (Isaiah 44:22).
9.3.2. Original sin contradicts Jesus’ teachings
9.3.2.1. Forgive one another to be forgiven
“For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly
Father will also forgive you” (Matthew 6:14).
“Forgive and you will be forgiven” (Luke 6:37).
Does it make sense that God forgives us if we forgive one another and yet
He wouldn’t forgive Adam and Eve?
9.3.2.2. The children are pure and sinless
Jesus never mentioned anything about babies inheriting original sin and
being cast into Hell or Limbo if they die unbaptized. On the contrary, he
acknowledged their purity which leads them to Heaven.
“And He called a child to Himself and set him before them, and said, ‘Truly I
say to you, unless you are converted and become like children, you will not
enter the kingdom of heaven’” (Matthew 18:2-3).
“Let the children alone, and do not hinder them from coming to Me; for the
kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these” (Matthew 19:14).
Did Jesus want us to be like children because they deserve Hell or Heaven?
9.3.3. Original sin is an innovation
Some Christian scholars presume that original sin is Biblical. They
presume that the following verse of John refers to original sin and redemption.
“The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, ‘Look, the
Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!’” (John 1:29)
36
Figure 14: Would God Who breathed His Noble Spirit in babies, cast them with original sin and if not baptized cast them into Hell or Limbo?
Babies or infants are born pure. They have not committed sins and they do not
comprehend what is meant by accepting or rejecting Jesus. Would it be fair to punish them and send them to Hell for Adam and Eve’s sin?
However, this verse was stated by John and not by Jesus. In addition, it
could be understood in the sense that, like all the prophets, Jesus was sent to
take away sins of people by guiding them to God’s Straight Path.
Christian scholars also refer to Psalm (51:5) in the Old Testament as
evidence for original sin.
“Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity; And in sin, my mother conceived
me” (Psalm 51:5).
However, why did the Jews for hundreds of years after the above verse of
Psalms was revealed never believe in original sin? Didn’t Paul or the Church
scholars know that: “the iniquity of the father is not inherited” (Ezekiel
18:20).
Who gave Paul and the Church the authority to add original sin to
Christianity? Nobody, including Jesus, has been given this authority.
“Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the
commands of the LORD your God that I give you” (Deuteronomy 4:2)
“For I [Jesus] have not spoken on my own authority, but the Father who sent
me gave me command, what I should say and what I should speak” (John
12:49).
9.3.4. Original sin is a controversial issue
As explained before, generally speaking according to original sin, as
elaborated by Augustine, those who do not believe in Jesus, as a redeemer for
37
their sin, and are not baptised, whether adults or new-borns, will not enjoy
salvation. However, Original sin has been an issue of dispute between
Christian scholars who have faced the terrible pain of parents who lost their
babies before their baptism.
Both Catholics and Protestants in the Western Traditions accept
Augustinian original sin. However, some Protestant scholars believe that those
who died as believers prior to the crucifixion of Jesus reside in a place named
“Abraham's Bosom,” which is not Heaven, but not Hell.
The Eastern Orthodox Churches, on the other hand, have different
understandings of “sin and salvation”. They acknowledge that Adam and
Eve's sin introduced ancestral sin but deny that humanity inherited guilt or
bear the consequences of original sin. Most Eastern theologians rejected any
suggestion that infants are born tainted with sin.
In recent decades, some Catholic theologians have departed from the
Church's traditional position and suggested that unbaptized infants, etc. may
somehow attain salvation and thus be accepted into Heaven. In 2007, the
International Theological Commission released a ground- breaking report,
approved by Pope Benedict XVI, in which they stated that there is a
possibility for the unbaptized babies to go to heaven.
9.3.5. Conclusion
It may be concluded that original sin is an innovation of Apostle Paul,
which was further stretched by Augustine (354 - 430). Original sin is not
based on the scripture and was never mentioned by Jesus. It contradicts God’s
Passion, Kindness, Love and Justice and it deprives unbaptized new-borns of
God’s Grace.
Various modern Christian and contemporary denominations have
reinterpreted or denied original sin. Pope John Paul II (1978-2005) of the
Catholic Church denounced it (9).
According to Islam, we are born pure, and there is no original sin. God is
Forgiving and Merciful and full of love for us. Both Adam and Eve repented
and were forgiven.
“Then Adam received words from his Lord, so his Lord pardoned him
(accepted his repentance) He is very Relenting, the Most Merciful” (Qur’an
2:37).
9. Paul II (1994). Crossing the threshold of hope, Random House, Inc., New York City, page 228.
38
Table 3: Comparison between four issues in the belief of the three main Churches; Orthodoxy, Protestantism and Roman Catholicism
Topic Orthodox Protestant Roman Catholic
Holy Spirit The third person of the Trinity, proceeding from the Father alone as in the original Nicene Creed.
The Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son.
Agrees with the Protestant view.
Bible - Composition
Accept the 39 Old Testament and 27 New Testament books, and the Deuterocanonicals books which are not found in the Hebrew Bible.
Protestants reject the Deuterocanonicals as not being inspired scripture and term them Apocrypha.
Agrees with Orthodoxy as to the validity of these books.
Mary's position
Mary is venerated as God-bearer. She is first amongst the saints and 'ever-virgin'.
Mary was a holy woman chosen to bear the Son of God. Her perpetual virginity and intercession are denied.
The view is similar to the Orthodox church - the title 'Mother of God' is commonly used.
Papal - Infallibility
Papal Infallibility is rejected. The Holy Spirit acts to guide the church into truth through ecumenical councils.
Protestants also reject Papal infallibility. The only source of infallible teaching is that found in the Bible.
The Pope is infallible. Through the Holy Spirit.
“Say, ‘Oh My servants who have transgressed against themselves: do not
despair of God’s mercy, for God forgives all sins. He is indeed the Forgiver,
the Clement.’” (Qur’an 39:53).
10. How to restore the original message of God
10.1. Christian groups and denominations
There are five major groups of Churches, namely: the Roman Catholic,
Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Protestant, and Anglican Churches.
However, according to the “World Christian Encyclopaedia,” published in
2001, there are about 34,000 different Christian groups or denominations
which have emerged from the main Churches. These denominations believe
and teach many different confusing and contradictory philosophies about God,
Christ and the Bible (Table 3).
39
In addition, each denomination proclaims that it follows the Bible and Jesus
Christ and it knows the truth (10).
Could all these conflicting Christian beliefs and philosophies be right?
Obviously, if one of them is right, the rest must be wrong. How would one
pick up the right denomination from thousands of them?
10.2. Which denomination is right?
Unfortunately, most denominations embrace the Pauline interpretation of
Jesus as the “true” Christianity. How we could trust these denominations and
as it has been previously demonstrated: Paul was an enemy of Jesus and he
abolished his message.
Paul was rejected by Jesus’ true Apostles.
Paul lied, cheated, contradicted himself and contradicted the teachings of
Jesus Christ.
In addition, Jesus anticipated and warned about people like Paul.
“At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ Or, ‘There he
is!’ Do not believe it. For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and
perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I
have told you ahead of time” (Matthew 24:23-24).
10.3. Can we restore our religion by relying on Jesus words in the Gospels?
Some Christian groups have discovered the falsehoods of Paul and have
tried to rely only on the words of Jesus in the Gospels. However, the Bible we
have today was compiled by the scholars of the Church of Constantine who
were enforcing Pauline Christianity. Therefore, what we have in hand is only
what the selected canonical Gospels tell about Jesus.
Although it is true that we still can trace the outline of the message of
Jesus (PBUH) from his words in the Bible, as we did in this booklet it is,
however, impossible to trace his full detailed message after thousands of years
of distortions and corruptions.
10. http://www.is-there-a-god.info/blog/belief/40000-christian-denominations-show-christian-god-doesnt-exist-
1/
40
10.4. Would God leave us without guidance?
God loves us; He would not leave us to be lost without guidance.
Whenever people deviated from His Straight Path or were misguided, He sent
a prophet to remind them.
“There is no community but a warner has passed through it” (Qur’an 35:24).
When the Jews deviated from the commandments of God, He sent Jesus to
guide them back to his Straight Path. Likewise, when Christianity was
corrupted by Paul, Constantine and the Church, God sent the Prophet
Muhammad and revealed to him the Glorious Qur’an to guide mankind to His
Straight Path.
10.5. Muhammad is the foretold brethren prophet
Abraham had two wives, Sarah and Hagar. His first son was born to Hagar
and was called Ishmael (Genesis, 16:15). A brother of Ishmael was born to
Sarah after thirteen years and was called Isaac. According to the Bible, the
children of Isaac and Ishmael (PBUT) are brethren (brothers).
“And Ismael will dwell in the presence of all his brethren” (Genesis 16:12).
“And He [Ishmael] died in the presence of all his brethren” (Genesis 25:18).
Muhammad is a descendant from among the brethren of the Israelites. In
Deuteronomy 18:18, God said to Moses:
“I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and
will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I
command Him” (Deuteronomy 18:18).
The prophet of the brethren of the Israelites who had the words of God
(the Qur’an) in his mouth was the Prophet Muhammad. In Acts 13:22-23, Paul
misinterpreted this prophecy as a reference to Jesus. However, Jesus is from
the Israelites and not their brethren.
On the other hand, the prophecy tells that the brethren prophet is like
Moses. Interestingly, both Moses and Muhammad (PBUT) were born and
died naturally, had families and children, were forced to migrate in their
adulthood, had a new Law of God revealed to them, were statesmen and
fought their enemies and achieved victories over them. Conversely, Jesus was
born miraculously, did not die naturally, did not fight battles, did not migrate
in his adulthood, did not marry and was not a statesman.
41
Interestingly, to mislead Christians and keep them away from the Prophet
Muhammad, some recent translations substituted the term brethren with
‘among their fellow Israelites’ and ‘countrymen’.
“Oh Prophet (Muhammad), Verily, We have sent you as a witness, a bearer of
glad tidings and a Warner; and a preacher to God by His leave and a lamp
spreading light” (Qur’an 33:45-46).
10.6. Jesus’ prophecy about the advent of Muhammad
In his last speech, Jesus foretold the advent of the Prophet Muhammad.
“I still have a lot to say to you, but you cannot bear it now. Yet when the
Spirit of Truth comes, he’ll guide you into all truth. He won’t speak on his
own accord, but he’ll speak whatever he hears and will declare to you the
things that are to come. He will glorify me because he will take what is mine
and declare it to you” (John 16:12-14).
The “Spirit of Truth” in the above verse is Muhammad. He is not the Holy
Spirit as claimed by the Church to hide the truth.
According to the Bible, the Holy Spirit was already around and attended
the baptism of Jesus (PBUH, Matthew 3:16). In other words, he didn’t need to
come after Jesus because he already existed. On the other hand, according to
Christianity, the Holy Spirit is supposed to be part of the God Head, and
therefore he does not need to hear from God and speak what he hears.
As Jesus foretold, the Prophet Muhammad and all the billions of Muslims
who have been following him, glorify, respect and love Jesus.
The Prophet Muhammad was sent to humanity to clear up the darkness
and illusion created by Paul and the Church and to guide humanity to the
Straight Path of God conveyed by Jesus and all prophets (PBUT). Today,
around 24% of the global population follow Muhammad.
“Those who follow the Messenger, the Unlettered Prophet, whom they find
mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel in their possession, He directs them to
righteousness, and deters them from evil, and allows for them all good things,
and prohibits for them wickedness, and unloads the burdens and the shackles
that are upon them. Those who believe in him, and respect him, and support
him, and follow the light that came down with him—these are the successful”
(Qur’an 7:157).
42
11. Concluding remarks
Jesus gave a parable of a man who sowed good seeds of wheat in his
field. While everyone was sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among
the wheat, and went away. When the wheat sprouted and formed heads, it was
mixed with weeds. The owner of the field of wheat ordered the harvesters to
collect the weeds, tie them and burn them, so that the pure wheat could then
be claimed (Matthew 13:24-29).
As has been demonstrated in this book, while, Jesus sowed the seeds of the
pure message of God, Paul sowed the seeds of paganism in the form of a
cosmic sacrifice of a divine son of God (Jesus) for the redemption of an
original sin and the emancipation from the Law of God.
Paul was a contemporary of Jesus in time and place. However, instead of
becoming one of his followers, he arrested, tortured and killed his followers.
Paul was full of hatred of Jesus and he dedicated his whole life to destroying
his message. Therefore, he considered Jesus and the Law of God curses for us
and avoided and disrespected Jesus’ Apostles.
“My one ambition is to proclaim the Gospel where the name of the Messiah is
not known, so I don’t build on someone else’s foundation” (Romans 15:20,
ISV).
“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us”
(Galatians 3:13).
“I saw that they (Jesus’ Apostles) walked not uprightly according to the truth
of the Gospel” (Galatians 2:14).
God, the most Gracious and the most Loving, has given us the logic to
differentiate between the truth and falsehood. He has also given us an amazing
heart that perceives the truth. Pleas ask yourself:
If Jesus was divine and his mission was to die on the cross for the
redemption of our sins, why he never mentioned these ideas in the
Gospels?
If his mission was to nullify the Law of God, why did he preach and
observe it and why did he command his followers to stick to it?
Does it make sense that Jesus came in a vision to Paul to command him to
nullify his message?
Jesus warned of false apostles like Paul and he laid the way for us to find
our way back to the Straight Path of God.
43
“For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs
and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you ahead
of time” (Matthew 24:23-24).
“When the Spirit of Truth comes he’ll guide you into all truth.” (John 16:13)
The Prophet Muhammad is the Spirit of the Truth. He was foretold by
Jesus, Abraham and Moses [Please read sections 10.5 and 10.6]. He is your
only guide to the pure message of God. He is your guide to ISLAM.
“Surely, those who say: ‘Our Lord is God,’ and then go straight, the angels
will descend upon them: ‘Do not fear, and do not grieve, but rejoice in the
news of the Garden which you were promised. We are your allies in this life
and in the Hereafter, wherein you will have whatever your souls desire, and
you will have therein whatever you call for; a Hospitality from an All-
Forgiving, Merciful’” (Qur’an 41:30-35).
Other books for the writer
1. Restore your original religion
2. Did Jesus preach Islam?
3. Does science lead to God?
4. Science in the Glorious Qur’an
5. Spirituality in yoga, Christianity and Islam
www.islamic-invitation.com