Upload
others
View
21
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Volumetric Modulated Arc TherapyVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy--
Planning & QA Planning & QA
Daliang Cao, PhD, DABR
Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
OutlineOutline
VMAT treatment planningVMAT treatment planning
Comparison between VMAT and Helical TomotherapyComparison between VMAT and Helical Tomotherapy
VMAT machine QA and patient specific QA VMAT machine QA and patient specific QA
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT Treatment PlanningVMAT Treatment Planning
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Commercial Planning SystemsCommercial Planning Systems
Elekta Ergo++Elekta Ergo++®®
Elekta MonacoElekta Monaco®® VMAT 3.0VMAT 3.0
Elekta MonacoElekta Monaco®® VMAT 3.2VMAT 3.2
Eclipse RapidArcEclipse RapidArc®®
Philips SmartArcPhilips SmartArc®®
ProwessProwess®®
NucletronNucletron -- OncentraOncentra VMATVMAT
anatomy based semi-inverse planning
fluence based planning
aperture based planning
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Comparison of Comparison of different inverse planning approaches different inverse planning approaches
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
A Pancreas CaseA Pancreas Case
Anatomy-based Fluence-based Aperture-based
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
A Pancreas CaseA Pancreas Case
Thick Solid lines: Anatomy-basedThin Solid lines: Fluence-basedDashed lines: Aperture-based
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
A H&N CaseA H&N Case
Thin Solid lines: Anatomy-basedThick Solid lines: Fluence-basedDashed lines: Aperture-based
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Which Planning System to Choose?Which Planning System to Choose?
The anatomyThe anatomy--based Inverse planning is easy to plan and based Inverse planning is easy to plan and is capable of generating conformal dose distributions for is capable of generating conformal dose distributions for simple cases. However, it may fail to provide a solution simple cases. However, it may fail to provide a solution for more complex cases.for more complex cases.
Both fluenceBoth fluence--based and aperturebased and aperture--based inverse planning based inverse planning approaches can achieve comparable plan qualities for approaches can achieve comparable plan qualities for most of the clinical cases.most of the clinical cases.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Comparison Between VMAT and Helical Comparison Between VMAT and Helical TomotherapyTomotherapy
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Lung CaseLung Case
Helical Tomotherapy 1-arc VMAT
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Lung CaseLung Case
GTV
PTV
heart
lungcord
Delivery time for VMAT plan was 2’04”
Delivery time for the Tomotherapy plan was 5’44”
Solid lines: VMATDashed lines: Tomo
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Prostate CaseProstate Case
Helical Tomotherapy 1-arc VMAT
PTV1 PTV1
bladder bladderrectum rectum
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Prostate CaseProstate Case
Solid lines: VMATDashed lines: Tomo
GTV
PTV1
PTV2
Rectum
BladderFemoralHeads
Delivery time for VMAT plan was 2’09”
Delivery time for Tomotherapy plan was 3’31”
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Head & Neck Case #1Head & Neck Case #1
Two targets with prescription levels of 5040 and 4500 cGy
Helical Tomotherapy 2-arc VMAT
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Head & Neck Case #1Head & Neck Case #1
Two targets with prescription levels of 5040 and 4500 cGyTwo targets with prescription levels of 5040 and 4500 cGy
Helical Tomotherapy 2-arc VMAT
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Average V95: Tomotherapy = 98.4% and VMAT = 98.6%
Max cord dose: Tomotherapy = 34.4 Gy and VMAT = 21.6 GyMean parotids dose: Tomotherapy = 12.1 GY and VMAT = 12.6 Gy.
Solid lines: VMATDashed lines: Tomo
GTV
PTV1
PTV2
LT Parotid
RT Parotid
Cord
Head & Neck Case #1Head & Neck Case #1
Delivery time for VMAT plan was 4’25”
Delivery time for the Helical Tomotherapy plan was 9’07”
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Solid = SmartArc Dashed = Tomotherapy
Head & Neck Case #2Head & Neck Case #2
PTV70
PTV60
PTV66
CordLt. Parotid
Rt. Parotid
PTV50
Lt. Parotid
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT provided a 43% reduction in treatment time.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT machine QAVMAT machine QA
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT Machine Specific QAVMAT Machine Specific QA
MLC leaf positionMLC leaf position
Gantry angleGantry angle
Dose rateDose rate
The three major variables during VMAT deliveryThe three major variables during VMAT delivery
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
A special VMAT plan with specific MLC A special VMAT plan with specific MLC leaf motion patterns and dose rate leaf motion patterns and dose rate
variations was developed to check all variations was developed to check all three major variables three major variables
Gantry continue rotates while the MLC leaves are moving.
Dose rate also varies while gantry is rotating.
The plan was measured using a MatriXX 2D ion chamber inserted in a MULTICube phantom.
The data were recorded in movie mode with 0.1 second sampling time.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
The VMAT plan for machine QAThe VMAT plan for machine QA
The theoretical dose distribution calculated using convolution/superposition dose engine in Pinnacle. The calculation was done with 1° gantry spacing.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
How to check the variablesHow to check the variables
MLC leaf motion: The projection position of the tip for MLC leaf motion: The projection position of the tip for each MLC leaf on the MatriXX device can be used to each MLC leaf on the MatriXX device can be used to determine the MLC leaf motion accuracy.determine the MLC leaf motion accuracy.
Gantry angle: The projection width of the 1cm gap Gantry angle: The projection width of the 1cm gap between MLC leaves on the MatriXX device can be used between MLC leaves on the MatriXX device can be used to determine the gantry angle.to determine the gantry angle.
Dose rate: The absolute dose measured in the open Dose rate: The absolute dose measured in the open area from each 0.1s sample can be used to determine area from each 0.1s sample can be used to determine the actual dose rate.the actual dose rate.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
The measurement resultThe measurement result
The measurement was interpolated into 1mm dose grid using cubic splineinterpolation method. The sample time is 0.1 second.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
QA ResultsQA Results
The standard deviation of the gantry angle error is 1.0° with a maximum error of 2.6°. The standard deviation of the leaf position error is 1.1mm with a maximum error of 3.1mm in this case.The mean error of the dose rate is 2.7 MU/minutes or 3.2% in relative mode.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT patient specific QAVMAT patient specific QA
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
VMAT plan QA methodsVMAT plan QA methods
Film & ion chamberFilm & ion chamber
diode array diode array
MapcheckMapcheck in in MapPhanMapPhan phantomphantom
ArcCheckArcCheck
Delta4Delta4
2D ion chamber array 2D ion chamber array
MatriXX in MULTICube phantomMatriXX in MULTICube phantom
PTW 729 in PTW 729 in OctaviusOctavius phantomphantom
Composite dose measurement Fluence measurement
2D ion chamber array2D ion chamber array
MatriXXMatriXX mounted on Gantrymounted on Gantry
Portal Portal dosimetrydosimetry
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Film & Ion ChamberFilm & Ion Chamber
A stack of solid water phantom with a total thickness of 15cm.A stack of solid water phantom with a total thickness of 15cm.A 0.6cc farmer chamber was inserted at the depth of 10cm.A 0.6cc farmer chamber was inserted at the depth of 10cm.A film was sandwiched 1cm above the ion chamber. A film was sandwiched 1cm above the ion chamber.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Prostate CaseProstate Case
Plan Measurement
Ion Chamber measurement is 1.3% below the predicted value
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
H&N CaseH&N Case
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
2D Diode Array2D Diode Array
A MapCheck device inserted into a A MapCheck device inserted into a MapPhanMapPhan solid water phantomsolid water phantom
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
MapCheck in MapCheck in MapPhanMapPhan QA resultQA result
With 3% and 3mm criteria, the gamma analysis passing rate is 96.With 3% and 3mm criteria, the gamma analysis passing rate is 96.5%5%Dose threshold in gamma analysis is 10%Dose threshold in gamma analysis is 10%
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Dose Rate DependencyDose Rate Dependency
0.975
0.980
0.985
0.990
0.995
1.000
1.005
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 500.00
dose rate (MU/minute)
rela
tive
dose
res
pons
e
Mapcheck diode
MatriXX ion chamber
The variation of dose response with the dose rate can reach up to 2.5% for MapCheck diode.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Calibrate MapCheck with medium dose rateCalibrate MapCheck with medium dose rate
Gamma passing rate increased to 98.8%Gamma passing rate increased to 98.8%
Dose calibration was performed at 224 MU/Min
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Angular dose response of MapCheck Angular dose response of MapCheck diodediode
Significant variation of the dose response can be found when theSignificant variation of the dose response can be found when the incidence incidence beam angle is parallel to the detector plane.beam angle is parallel to the detector plane.Each diode in MapCheck may have different angular dose response Each diode in MapCheck may have different angular dose response curve. curve.
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180Gantry Angle
Per
cent
Err
or (
%)
180°°°°
90°°°°
0°°°°
-90°°°°
Couch
detector array& phantom
-180°°°°
phantom setup MapCheck Diode MatriXX ion chamber
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180
Gantry Angle
perc
ent e
rro
r (%
)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
1386 diode detectors arranged in cylindrical geometry1386 diode detectors arranged in cylindrical geometry
Measures entrance and exit doseMeasures entrance and exit dose
The QA can be done in composite or per control point The QA can be done in composite or per control point
Arc Check Arc Check –– Sun NuclearSun Nuclear
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
ArcCHECKArcCHECK features a versatile central cavityfeatures a versatile central cavity
–– May be used to accommodate different detectors and insertsMay be used to accommodate different detectors and inserts
–– MultiPlugMultiPlug (left) also accommodates EBT film cassette and (left) also accommodates EBT film cassette and multiple detector locationsmultiple detector locations
Central Cavity OptionsCentral Cavity Options
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
SNC Patient SoftwareSNC Patient Software
Software enables composite and control point analysisSoftware enables composite and control point analysis
DICOM RT Dose is imported and DICOM RT Dose is imported and ArcCHECKArcCHECK software then extracts 3D software then extracts 3D dose corresponding to detector locations, and performs a comparidose corresponding to detector locations, and performs a comparisonson
All data files from All data files from ArcCHECKArcCHECK are open format for easy exportare open format for easy export
–– Raw data also available for exportRaw data also available for export
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
ArcCheckArcCheck QA resultQA result
Gamma analysis passing rate is 95.2% for this case.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
ScandidosScandidos DeltaDelta 44
A cylinder-shaped plastic phantom with 2 imbedded orthogonal crossing detector planes.1069 diode detectorsDose is recorded in 2 planes and a 3D dose is reconstructed for comparison with the QA plan.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
CompositeComposite--level analysis of level analysis of SmartArc plan with DeltaSmartArc plan with Delta44
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
MatriXX & MULTICube phantomMatriXX & MULTICube phantom
MatriXX system has 1020 vented ion chambers with an active area MatriXX system has 1020 vented ion chambers with an active area of of 24.4cm x 24.4cm.24.4cm x 24.4cm.
The size of each ion chamber is 4.5cm (diameter) x 5cm (height).The size of each ion chamber is 4.5cm (diameter) x 5cm (height). The raw The raw pixel size is 7.62mm, which can be interpolated down to 1mm.pixel size is 7.62mm, which can be interpolated down to 1mm.
Laser is used to align system. Dose from both coronal and sagittLaser is used to align system. Dose from both coronal and sagittal planes al planes can be measured depending on the phantom.can be measured depending on the phantom.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Results: Prostate CaseResults: Prostate Case
With 3% and 3mm criteria, the passing rate is 99% for this coronWith 3% and 3mm criteria, the passing rate is 99% for this coronal sliceal slice
measurement plan
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
MatriXX QA: H&N CaseMatriXX QA: H&N Case
measurement plan
With 3% and 3mm criteria, the passing rate is 98.2% for this corWith 3% and 3mm criteria, the passing rate is 98.2% for this coronal sliceonal sliceNo dose threshold was applied in gamma analysis. Note the passinNo dose threshold was applied in gamma analysis. Note the passing rate reduces to 97.1% g rate reduces to 97.1% if a 10% threshold is applied. if a 10% threshold is applied.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Angular variation of dose responseAngular variation of dose response
Up to 8% dose variation can be found when the photon beam is parUp to 8% dose variation can be found when the photon beam is parallel to the detector allel to the detector planeplane
180°°°°
90°°°°
0°°°°
-90°°°°
Couch
detector array& phantom
-180°°°°
phantom setup
-10.0
-6.0
-2.0
2.0
6.0
10.0
-180 -120 -60 0 60 120 180Gantry Angle
per
cen
t err
or
(%)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
MatriXX EvolutionMatriXX Evolution
The gantry angle for each frame is recorded during the VMAT deliThe gantry angle for each frame is recorded during the VMAT delivery.very.
A angular dose response correction is applied to all the data baA angular dose response correction is applied to all the data based on the sed on the gantry angle information.gantry angle information.
InclinometerInput
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
With and Without Angular response With and Without Angular response correctioncorrection
The measured data without angular dose response The measured data without angular dose response correction is slightly colder than the one with correction.correction is slightly colder than the one with correction.
PlanMeasurement
Without CorrectionMeasurement
With Correction
A two-arc case: H&N
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
With and Without Angular response With and Without Angular response correctioncorrection
3% and 3mm passing criteria for Gamma analysis.3% and 3mm passing criteria for Gamma analysis.
Without Correction81.9%
With Correction96.2%
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Portal Portal DosimetryDosimetry
Portal Dosimetry Process
Created verification plan for each patient
Calibrated panel prior to collecting data
Data measured in units of CU
Definition of Calibrated Unit (CU)Field Size =10 x 10 cm2SDD = 105 cmDeliver 100 MU to panelSet reading = 1 CU1 CU is numerically approximate to 1 Gy
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Portal Portal DosimetryDosimetry –– RapidArcRapidArc (Prostate)(Prostate)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Portal Portal DosimetryDosimetry –– RapidArcRapidArc (Prostate)(Prostate)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Portal Portal DosimetryDosimetry –– RapidArcRapidArc (HN)(HN)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
SummarySummary
VMAT planning systems using different techniques are available iVMAT planning systems using different techniques are available in n the market. Fluence and aperture based algorithms can provide the market. Fluence and aperture based algorithms can provide better dose distributions than anatomy based algorithm, especialbetter dose distributions than anatomy based algorithm, especially ly for more complex cases.for more complex cases.
VMAT and Helical Tomotherapy provide comparable IMRT plan VMAT and Helical Tomotherapy provide comparable IMRT plan quality. However, VMAT delivery efficiency is much better.quality. However, VMAT delivery efficiency is much better.
The three major variables during VMAT The three major variables during VMAT delivery(gantrydelivery(gantry angle, MLC angle, MLC leaf position and dose rate) should be checked as part of the VMleaf position and dose rate) should be checked as part of the VMAT AT machine specific QA. machine specific QA.
There are many methods/devices available for VMAT patient QA. There are many methods/devices available for VMAT patient QA. Users need to know limit of each QA technique/device for best Users need to know limit of each QA technique/device for best patient specific QA result.patient specific QA result.
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
AcknowledgementAcknowledgement
David M. Shepard, Ph.D.David M. Shepard, Ph.D.
Muhammad K. N. Afghan, Ph.D.Muhammad K. N. Afghan, Ph.D.
Fan Chen, Ph.D.Fan Chen, Ph.D.
Min Rao, Ph.D.Min Rao, Ph.D.
Jinsong Ye, M.S.Jinsong Ye, M.S.
Tony P. Wong, Ph.D.Tony P. Wong, Ph.D.
Vivek Mehta, M.D.Vivek Mehta, M.D.
David HousleyDavid Housley
Grace KimGrace Kim
Igor Gomola, Ph.D.Igor Gomola, Ph.D.
Gerry Gerry VantellingenVantellingen
Jie Shi, Ph.D.Jie Shi, Ph.D.
Kris LyleKris Lyle
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Thank you!Thank you!
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Virtual InclinometerVirtual Inclinometer
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
3DVH Option3DVH Option
The most advanced 3D patient dose and DVH tools availableThe most advanced 3D patient dose and DVH tools available
–– Uses existing Uses existing ArcCHECKArcCHECK measurementsmeasurements
–– Supports VMAT and Supports VMAT and RapidArcRapidArc deliveriesdeliveries
–– No secondary dose calculation algorithmNo secondary dose calculation algorithm
–– 3D dose and DVH analysis on 3D dose and DVH analysis on patientpatient geometry (not phantom geometry (not phantom geometry)geometry)
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
MatriXX data conversionMatriXX data conversion
The raw image has only 1024 pixels with 7.62mm dose grid. The daThe raw image has only 1024 pixels with 7.62mm dose grid. The data set can be interpolated to ta set can be interpolated to 1mm dose grid.1mm dose grid.
linear
Cubic Spline
2012 Penn2012 Penn--Ohio AAPM Chapter Ohio AAPM Chapter Fall Symposium, ClevelandFall Symposium, Cleveland
Portal Portal DosimetryDosimetry –– RapidArcRapidArc (HN)(HN)