Upload
naszacha
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 19
Using a social networking site for experiential learning Appropriating lurking
modeling and community building
Nike Arnold a1 Trena Paulus b12
a Portland State University Department of Applied Linguistics PO Box 751 Portland OR 97207-0751 USAb University of Tennessee Educational Psychology and Counseling 515BEC 1122 Volunteer Blvd Knoxville TN 37996-3452 USA
a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o
Keywords
Social networking site
Vicarious interaction
Case study
Experiential learning
Lurking
Teacher education
With social networking sites playing an increasingly important role in todays society educators are
exploring how they can be used as a teaching and learning tool This article reports the 1047297ndings of a
qualitative case study about the integration of Ning into a blended course The study draws on the
perspectives of the students the instructor and an outside observer to explore the intended and unintended
outcomes of Ning use As intended by the instructor the site effectively served as an information repository
and the blogs and discussion forums promoted re1047298ection and review of each others work Unintended
outcomes included community building and modeling both of which are types of vicarious interaction that
fall into the category of pedagogical lurking
copy 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved
1 Introduction
With blogs wikis and social networking sites (SNSs) the Internet
has entered the new era of Web 20 which goes beyond linking
information to connecting people (Warschauer 2009) Facebook andother SNSs are becoming more prevalent in educational environ-
ments with educators exploring how such tools can be used for
teaching and learning (Schwartz 2009 Terris 2009) Social network-
ing sites differ from and provide an alternative to proprietary course
management systems such as Blackboard since SNSs emphasize
community and collaboration They are designed to combine
individual pro1047297le pages with group interaction tools such as chat
blogs and discussion forums Many existing SNSs are free and can be
incorporated by teachers without additional cost which is why they
can be particularly useful when teaching courses on technology
integration in the classroom Through the use of experiential learning
techniques students themselves learn the computer-mediated com-
munication (CMC) technologies they will eventually use in their own
teachingThis paper describes the useof a publicly availableSNS Ning and its integration into a blended university course on computer-
assisted language learning (CALL)
Our study is informed by a re1047298ective practice stance more
speci1047297cally a retrospective re1047298ection-on-action perspective (Schoumln
1983) Framed as a case study (Merriam 1998) we drew upon data
from three perspectives (that of the course instructor the students
and an outside observer) to explore how the Ning site served as an
online presence for the class rede1047297ned the meaning of interaction
and modeled the potential of technology to support language
learning By including the students as well as an outsiders
perspective we do not focus exclusively on theteacher a shortcoming
of the re1047298ective practice stance identi1047297ed by Kumaravadivelu (2003)We integrated these three perspectives as follows Dr Arnold the
instructor of the course described and re1047298ected upon the context of
the course and articulated her design decisions for using the Ning tool
In this article she presents her descriptions and re1047298ections in her own
voice using the1047297rst person The students perspectives were obtained
through interview data collected by Dr Paulus an instructional
designer with 11 years of experience using and researching comput-
er-mediated communication in language and other teaching environ-
ments She analyzed the content and structure of the Ning site to
provide an outside perspective on what was happening in the class
Both Dr Arnold and Dr Paulus collaborated on iterations of the data
analysis to answer the research questions Together these three
perspectives mdash instructor student and outside observer mdash shed light
on the potential for SNSs to support learning
2 Conceptual framework
From a pedagogical stance CMC tools offer a variety of bene1047297ts
such as an increased potential for student-to-student and student-to-
instructor interaction outside of traditional class time (Garrison
Anderson amp Archer 2000) In distance learning environments this
may lead to a greater sense of community which in turn can motivate
learners and decrease attrition rates (Rovai 2003) In hybrid or
blended learning environments however students sense of com-
munity may come primarily from the face-to-face meeting time
Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
Corresponding author Tel +1 44 503725 8258 fax +1 44 503725 4139
E-mail addresses narnoldpdxedu (N Arnold) tpaulusutkedu (T Paulus)1 Contributed equally to this article2 Tel +1 44 865974 8144 fax +1 44 865974 0135
1096-7516$ ndash see front matter copy 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved
doi101016jiheduc201004002
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Internet and Higher Education
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 29
Providing additional venues for interaction is especially valuable
for foreign language learning where exposure to the target language
is often limited CMC can provide authentic contextualized language
input beyond the con1047297nes of the classroom (Luke 2006) Chat email
and other forms of electronic communication can serve as a space for
meaningful interaction that promotes cultural pragmatic and lin-
guistic competence by allowing learners to use the language with
native speakers or other learners (Abrams 2006 Lomicka 2006)
Given its pedagogical potential for language instruction futurelanguage teachers like theparticipants of our study need to be able to
make informed decisions about appropriate CMC implementation
This is one reason CMC hasbeen integrated into many teacher training
programs Electronic discussions for example are a valuable tool for
teacher development because they can encourage information
exchange collaboration re1047298ection and problem solving (Arnold amp
Ducate 2006)
For many language teachers the decision whether and how to use
CALL including CMC is no longer based solely on their personal
preference but in1047298uenced by curricular requirements or employer
demands (Kessler 2006) This growing pressure further emphasizes
the need to provide teacher candidates with adequate training in how
to make effective use of technology Recognizing the importance of
such training teacher educators have debated not only which skills
and knowledge are necessary (Compton 2009 Teachers of English to
Speakers of Other Languages 2009) but also the format of such
training (Hubbard 2008 Hubbard amp Levy 2006) To help future
teachers understand the connection between theory and practice as
well as facilitate the application of their new skills and knowledge in
the classroom some scholars have called for training that explicitly
connects with realistic teaching contexts ldquoClearly CALL teacher
education must be more like the contexts in which such language
instruction takes placerdquo (Egbert 2006 p 168) There are several
pedagogical approaches to achieve this such as project based
learning situated learning and experiential learning
Experiential learning is ldquothe process whereby knowledge is
created through the transformation of experience Knowledge results
from the combination of grasping and transforming experiencerdquo
(Kolb 1984 p 41) According to the four-stage model of experientiallearning learners engage in re1047298ection and observation based on
concrete experiences in order to synthesize them into abstract
concepts which then form the basis for active experimentation
(Kolb Boyatzis amp Mainemelis 2001) The course described here was
designed to promote experiential learning by allowing students to
experience CMC as learners (concrete experience) and re1047298ecton these
experiences (re1047298ection) Students were asked to draw on both of
these course components when formulating their personal philoso-
phies about if and how to use CALL in their own teaching (abstract
concept) which it was hoped would inform their future teaching
(active experimentation)
The class investigated for this study used several CMC tools
through a SNS While instructional uses of CMC have been
investigated extensively research on the educational potential of SNSs is still in its infancy As Mitchell (2009) described students self-
motivated use of Facebook can promote language learning in a variety
of ways The idea of creating expressing and experimenting with
identities a central aspect of SNSs seems to have signi1047297cant
pedagogical potential (McBride 2009) especially within the meth-
odological framework of critical language learning (Halvorsen 2009)
As described by Blattner and Fiori (2009) Facebook can be used for
language instruction to promote socio-pragmatic competence Ob-
serving groups on Facebook can raise learners awareness of linguistic
issues such as regional language variation as well as provide
opportunities to put pragmatic knowledge to use while engaging in
communicative acts
As described above social networking can be an informal
(Mitchell 2009 Stevenson amp Liu 2010) or formal learning tool in
blended or onlineenvironments Therole of social networking tools in
blended environments has been investigated less frequently than in
fully distant environments How and why faculty and students use
SNSs as part of blended environments warrants further study This
study is intended to contribute to our understanding of how SNSs can
be used to support blended learning environments as well as model
technology integration practices to future teachers More speci1047297cally
we wanted to investigate the following research questions
1 How did the students in this blended course use the Ning site
2 What were student perceptions of Ning
3 How did the modeling of Ning use impact students plans to use
CMC andor SNS tools in their future teaching
4 How were the instructor goals for the use of the site met
3 Methodology
31 Research design and data collection
A qualitative case study (Merriam 1998) was our strategy to
explore this blended learning environment Merriam (1998) empha-
sizes that qualitative design is emergent with a recursive dynamic
process of data collection and analysis After receiving IRB ap-
proval from both our institutions the following data sources were
gathered a student questionnaire the content of the Ning site and
student interviews All data collection instruments are available
upon request
The questionnaire was administered to the students at the end of
the quarter and gathered the following information (1) demograph-
ics (age gender native language and undergraduate or graduate
status) (2) type of previous language teaching experience (language
and level) and (3) previous experience learning languages with
instructional technology (language and technologies) Further to
assess their level of technology use participantswere asked to take an
online quiz available from the Pew Internet and American Life Project
which categorizes respondents as oneof ten types on their technology
user taxonomy (Horrigan 2007)
After grades were entered at the end of the term all content fromparticipating students was downloaded from the Ning site for analysis
This included nine memberpro1047297le pages 14 wall comments 143
discussion forum posts 81 blog posts and three group pages (with
nine commentsposts) Students position papers were also down-
loaded for analysis Completed towards the end of the course this
assignment required students to draw on information from the
professional literature as well as their own experiences in the course
to formulate their personal philosophy of the role CALL can play to
promote language learning
Allparticipants were invited to participate in a one hour interview
Four participants (Ruth Tsukiko Gary and Karen) agreed to be
interviewed To allow students to speak openly about their opinions
Dr Paulus the outside observer conducted the interviews Since she
was not located in the same state as the participants synchronousinstant messenger tools were used for the interviews Participants
chose the tool they were most comfortable with and a variety of tools
(Skype Yahoo and Gmail) were used These text-based interviews
were automatically archived for analysis
32 Participants
Eight of the ten students consented to participate in the research
study Pseudonyms are used throughout this paper As illustrated in
Table 1 two students were male and the rest were female Their ages
ranged from 20 to 26 and two were non-native speakers of English
Four were undergraduates and four were graduates They had a range
of previous teaching experiences and experiences learning with
technology While four participants were ldquo
omnivoresrdquo
(heavy users)
189N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 39
of technology according to the Pew taxonomyothers made less use of
technology in their daily lives Pavla who was classi1047297e d as
ldquoconnected but hassledrdquo represented the lowest level of technology
use of this class being at level 5 of the taxonomys ten levels
33 Data analysis
We analyzed the data in an inductive iterative manner using a
modi1047297ed form of the constant comparative method guided by the
research questions (Bogdan amp Biklen 2007 Strauss amp Corbin 1998)
Merriam (1998) outlines three phases in this type of qualitative data
analysis intensive analysis developing categories and developing
theory Since we were interested in how students used the Ning site
we calculated descriptive tallies of the communication that took place
in the site (eg number of posts and comments made) as well as
reading through and making notes on the content of the site We
compared our initial descriptive tallies and notes with questionnaire
responses interviews and position papers Intensive analysis began as
we read and re-read the data each making notes and re1047298ections to
isolate the most striking aspects comparing and noting themes
related to theresearchquestionsWe kept a list of the major ideas thatcut across the data searching for regularities and patterns similar to
open coding as described by Strauss and Corbin (1998) Units of data
were isolated and labeled in the margins of the paper transcripts in
preparation for the next phase of developing categories We then
developed our initial lists into categories Similar to axial coding
(Strauss amp Corbin 1998) we sorted the concrete units into more
abstract categories Through an iterative process of convergence and
divergence we organized emerging categories and subcategories
Finally through a process of selective coding we developed a tentative
set of 1047297ndings From the initial concrete codes we identi1047297ed abstract
themes which were then compared to the data and to the literature
until the 1047297nal iteration of 1047297ndings were agreed upon
34 Course context and design decisions
We now move to a description of the course and the design
decisions made by Dr Arnold the course instructor This description
was written prior to data collection and analysis and it is written in
the 1047297rst person
I teach in an applied linguistics department at a large urban
university in thePaci1047297c Northwest Our program is primarily designed
for future teachers of English as a secondforeign language and offers
an MA in TESOL (teaching English to speakers of other languages) At
the undergraduate level the majority of our students are enrolled in a
certi1047297cate program In the winter quarter 2009 I taught a course
called ldquoComputer Assisted Language Learningrdquo (CALL) This was the
1047297rst time the course was offered and it was cross-listed as an elective
for undergraduate and graduate credit To allow for the seamless
integration of technology during class time the course met in a
computer lab
In light of the fact that most of our students are planning to
become professional language educators the pedagogical aspect of
CALL wasmy main focusMore speci1047297cally I wanted to equip students
with a solid knowledge and skill foundation to make informed
decisions about whether and how to use CALL in their own teaching
One of the main pedagogical principles driving my design of this
course was experiential education I 1047297rst experienced instructional
technology in a graduate class where online discussions allowed me
to step out of my self-imposed role as an outsider and become a more
active participant This experience is the basis for my belief in the
power of experiencing an instructional approach or tool1047297rsthand For
this course this meant providing students with the opportunity to
experience a variety of technological tools as userslearners This
would allow them to experience 1047297rst hand the potential bene1047297ts and
drawbacks of instructional technology
In selecting the thematic focus of this class I chose tools that
(1)do notrequire a lot of technological expertise from theteacher and
learners (2) are commonly used by members of the Net Generation
(Oblinger amp Oblinger 2005) and (3) are available at no cost In my
experience training future language teachers these criteria cansigni1047297cantly facilitate the implementation of instructional technology
Ultimately I decided that I wanted my students to work with four
applications mdash blog chat wiki and online discussion Many course
management systems like Blackboard now offer features like blogs
chats wikis and online discussions While they are available to many
instructors af 1047297liated with large institutions (usually in higher
education) they are not usually not an option for teachers in the
public school system Therefore I searched for an alternative that
would be more accessible to these future teachers
I also wanted to provide an online presence for the course I
envisioned this online presence mainly as an information resource
(similar to a course management system) as well as a portal for all the
tools that students would be working with Community building a
common reason for using SNSs was not a signi1047297cant factor in thisdecision-making process I felt that our class meetings which were all
conducted face-to-face would be the primary force in promoting a
supportive learning community
Social networking and group sites often include the tools I wanted
to use I decided against Facebook or MySpace because of their focus on
individual pro1047297les Joining Facebook requires creating an individual
pro1047297le after which users add friends join groups provide status
updates and comment on others activities My intention however
was 1047297rst and foremost to create a space for the class as a whole Ning
in contrast is group-centered somebody creates a site for a group
before inviting potential members to join the group While each Ning
site can be set up with blogs chats and online discussions it does not
include a wiki feature Unfortunately no other SNS or group site
offered all the features I was looking for so I settled for Ning and
Table 1
Description of participants
Name of
participant
Age N at ive
language
Status Type of previous teaching
experience
Previous experience learning
with instructional technology
Level of technology use Participated
in interview
Karen 23 English Graduate College level ESL Software for learning German Omnivore X
Pavla 21 Russian Under-gradu ate No teaching experience Course management s ystem Connected but hassled ndash
Alissa 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Productivity enhancer ndash
Ruth 25 English Under-graduate Tutoring ESL Online exercises and tests for
learning Spanish
Connector X
Gary 24 English Graduate College level Japanese Audio and notes of class lectures Omnivore XAnette 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Omnivore ndash
Tsukiko 25 Japanese Under-graduate Elementary school Japanese Software for learning English Omnivore X
Car l 20 En glish Under -g raduat e No te aching exper ience Sof twar e f or learning Spanish +cour se
management system
Lackluster veteran ndash
190 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 49
supplemented it with an outside wiki tool Fig 1 is a screen shot of the
main Ning page
At the beginning of the course I encouraged students to make the
Ning site their own and use it in whatever way they saw 1047297t I also
encouraged students to experiment with and tailor the tools made
availableto them through Ning when they were getting ready to work
on their group projects To facilitate collaboration I set up an outside
wiki and a separate page for each group on our Ning site Each group
then picked the features of their page (eg they decided if theywanted to have a discussion board on their group page)
After registering a personal page is set up for each user During
this process the user must respond to a series of pro1047297le questions
determined by the sites administrator To promote a feeling of
ownership I asked the students to decide which questions to include
to facilitate their getting to know each other This information was
then visible on each individual pro1047297le student status teaching
experience reason for taking the class goals for the class how they
currently use technology Delicious user name (a bookmarking site we
used in class) and membership status in other SNSs (eg Facebook)
4 Findings
Next we describe how students used the Ning site their
perceptions of the site how they plan to use technology in their
future teaching and how well the site helped the instructor reach the
goals for her course
41 Research question 1 student use of the Ning site
Pro1047297le pages ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posts are common features of
SNSs In this class students pro1047297le pages were personalized with
eight of the 10 students uploading photos and changing the
background and format of their pro1047297les In Ning ldquofriendingrdquo a
member of the social network allows you to exchange private
messages Wall posts are another way of communicating with other
members but the messages are visible to all members of the social
network All participants in this study friended at least one other
student in the class and all friended the instructor Fourteen wall
comments were made throughout the quarter and these were
primarily small talk or logistic in nature such as asking about
assignments missed during an absence
Most of the studentndashstudentndashinstructor conversations took place
in the Ning discussion forums Eleven forums were created by theinstructor and the class made a total of 143 posts Three of these
forums were used only by the instructor and their purpose was for
the instructor to share 1047297les with the students as there was no other
wayto upload1047297les to the Ning site Another three forumshad only one
post per student The 1047297ve forums with the greatest levels of
interaction had structured tasks for the students which required
feedback from their peers See Table 2 for task details
Overall the site did not have a high level of visible student-to-
student interaction beyond what was required by these assigned
tasks Some students were much more active than others Karen and
Gary both ldquoomnivoresrdquo posted most often (20 and 19 times
respectively) and Pavla who described herself as ldquoconnected but
hassledrdquo posted a good deal as well (16 times) (see Table 3)
The blog feature was also heavily used with 81 blog posts made
during the quarter This resulted from each student making 10
re1047298ective posts as assigned plus an additional post made by the
instructor Thegroup sites were used hardlyat all Whilethe instructor
advised groups to set up a group page it was the students who chose
whether and how to customize and utilize their pages (eg decided
which tools to feature on their page) All groups selected a pro1047297le
picture for their group which indicates at least initial intentions to
personalize and use the site Activity on the group sites was very
limited however All three groups did what the instructor had
recommended namely formulate a plan for the group project and
postit onthe group page Ofa total ofnineposts fourcan beattributed
Fig 1 Screen shot of Ning Site
191N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 59
to this type of organizing The remaining posts were to share resources
(2) refer group members to the wiki for new content added to theproject (1) and to thank group members for their work (2)
In summary unlike SNSs such as Facebook the friending and wall
post features were not heavily used The intended purpose for the
Ning site was to serve as a central repository for course materials and
submission of assignments in a public venue Visible interaction took
place in thediscussion forum andblogs as responses to assigned tasks
rather than as wall posts or student-initiated blog entries However
while not required to do so students reported in the interviews that
by virtue of the posts being publicly visible they were motivated to
read each others re1047298ective posts and assignments This 1047297nding is
explored in the next section
42 Research question 2 student perceptions of the Ning site
Overall the students felt that Ning operated as a ldquohubrdquo for the class
and was a ldquofresh alternative to Blackboardrdquo (Gary) Anette reported
that Ning was ldquoa great way to communicate and store informationrdquo
and sheldquoliked being able to refer to the site any time for info on classrdquo
Students would have liked Ning to have a calendar feature and some
felt that the design was not very intuitive for new users Although the
instructor was instrumental in organizing the Ning site she was not
heavily involved in the studentndashstudent interactions taking place
either during the chats or in the forums Students felt that the
instructor wanted it to be more of a student space where she would
facilitate but not dominate Three themes capture the student
perceptions of the Ning site community building modelingfeedback
and authenticity
421 Community building
While not an explicit goal of the instructor students felt that theirindividual pro1047297les encouraged bonding among students Unlike most
course management systems Ning allowed students to upload a pro1047297le
picture which was displayed as an identi1047297er whenever they posted
content to the site According to Karen being able to easily identify the
author of a post ldquomade for more community We knew everyones
name and we could link a person to their post betterrdquo Ruth described
When you share a special place like that I feel it bonds you in a
way And when youre bonded like that I feel your [sic] more likely
to care about your classmates which creates a better class
environment which promotes student success
Ning also made it easier for students to contact each other outside
of class when they needed to Gary explained ldquoThere were times
when students would miss a class and could ask for the notes or
assistance on an individuals lsquowallrsquordquo He also felt
it was a little challenging to lsquoopen-uprsquo and talk about personal
feelings towards problems andor situationsbut by being able to
do this in a blogwritten format helped and knowing that the
other students were going to be doing the same thing reduced the
anxiety
Ruth concurred that ldquopeople who did not often speak up in class
did so during these chat [making] comments that were more open
especiallyabout how certain words and phrases made us feel based
on our culturerdquo Thus even in this blended environment where
students met face-to-face Ning added to the sense of community
among students
422 Modeling and feedback
Having student work publicly available was felt to be a good way
to provide modeling in that students could see how others were
approaching the assignments Tsukiko explained ldquoSometimes I wasnt
sure what I needed to write But I read couple other students posting
to get the ideas of the assignment and what I needed to include in my
postingrdquo Students claimed to read each others work more than they
usually would even though they didnt necessarily respond to this
work with additional posts or comments Karen said ldquoI think I read
more than I normally would have Normally I dont read others posts
unless that is part of the assignmentthe homepage gave you a taste
and then you got curiousrdquo Apparently the list of latest activity on the
Ning homepage (eg blurbs of recent posts) not only allowed
Table 3
Number of posts and comments in discussion forum
Participant Number of forum posts made
Instructor 33
Karen 20
Gary 19
Pavla 16
Carl 15
Tsukiko 13
Alissa 11
Ruth 10
Anette 6
Total 143
Table 2
Most active discussion forum tasks and number of posts
Task description Number of posts
Post the 1047297le with your CALL activity as an attachment to a posting in this message board If you have any speci 1047297c
questions for the reviewer include them in the post Review the activity designed by one of your classmates
Pretend to be a learner and work through the whole activity It is important to provide detailed constructive
and honest feedback she can use to revise the activity before turning it in for a grade Here are some guiding
questions [9 questions included here] Post your feedback as a reply to the original message with the 1047297le
Your evaluation counts as a participation grade
27
Discuss the pedagogical pros and cons of annotations transcripts visual input (ie video+audio instead of audio only)the learners ability to pausereplay collaboration among learners and the use of authentic materials
Be sure to make this an interactive discussion Post your 1047297rst message by Thursday 12 noon
At least 3 messages are expected from each student
22
Post your CMC Activity here for peer review 18
Post the URL for your online text here 18
There are three phases to this assignment
1) Group A makes a list of keywords from the chapter and posts it in this forum
2) Group B assigns the keywords in Group As list to broader categories Reply to Group As original post
3) Group C works on an annotated list of based on the categorized list produced by Group B (originally made by Group A)
Statements should be added to the keywords to provide a short summary of what Chun reports regarding these issues
12
192 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 29
Providing additional venues for interaction is especially valuable
for foreign language learning where exposure to the target language
is often limited CMC can provide authentic contextualized language
input beyond the con1047297nes of the classroom (Luke 2006) Chat email
and other forms of electronic communication can serve as a space for
meaningful interaction that promotes cultural pragmatic and lin-
guistic competence by allowing learners to use the language with
native speakers or other learners (Abrams 2006 Lomicka 2006)
Given its pedagogical potential for language instruction futurelanguage teachers like theparticipants of our study need to be able to
make informed decisions about appropriate CMC implementation
This is one reason CMC hasbeen integrated into many teacher training
programs Electronic discussions for example are a valuable tool for
teacher development because they can encourage information
exchange collaboration re1047298ection and problem solving (Arnold amp
Ducate 2006)
For many language teachers the decision whether and how to use
CALL including CMC is no longer based solely on their personal
preference but in1047298uenced by curricular requirements or employer
demands (Kessler 2006) This growing pressure further emphasizes
the need to provide teacher candidates with adequate training in how
to make effective use of technology Recognizing the importance of
such training teacher educators have debated not only which skills
and knowledge are necessary (Compton 2009 Teachers of English to
Speakers of Other Languages 2009) but also the format of such
training (Hubbard 2008 Hubbard amp Levy 2006) To help future
teachers understand the connection between theory and practice as
well as facilitate the application of their new skills and knowledge in
the classroom some scholars have called for training that explicitly
connects with realistic teaching contexts ldquoClearly CALL teacher
education must be more like the contexts in which such language
instruction takes placerdquo (Egbert 2006 p 168) There are several
pedagogical approaches to achieve this such as project based
learning situated learning and experiential learning
Experiential learning is ldquothe process whereby knowledge is
created through the transformation of experience Knowledge results
from the combination of grasping and transforming experiencerdquo
(Kolb 1984 p 41) According to the four-stage model of experientiallearning learners engage in re1047298ection and observation based on
concrete experiences in order to synthesize them into abstract
concepts which then form the basis for active experimentation
(Kolb Boyatzis amp Mainemelis 2001) The course described here was
designed to promote experiential learning by allowing students to
experience CMC as learners (concrete experience) and re1047298ecton these
experiences (re1047298ection) Students were asked to draw on both of
these course components when formulating their personal philoso-
phies about if and how to use CALL in their own teaching (abstract
concept) which it was hoped would inform their future teaching
(active experimentation)
The class investigated for this study used several CMC tools
through a SNS While instructional uses of CMC have been
investigated extensively research on the educational potential of SNSs is still in its infancy As Mitchell (2009) described students self-
motivated use of Facebook can promote language learning in a variety
of ways The idea of creating expressing and experimenting with
identities a central aspect of SNSs seems to have signi1047297cant
pedagogical potential (McBride 2009) especially within the meth-
odological framework of critical language learning (Halvorsen 2009)
As described by Blattner and Fiori (2009) Facebook can be used for
language instruction to promote socio-pragmatic competence Ob-
serving groups on Facebook can raise learners awareness of linguistic
issues such as regional language variation as well as provide
opportunities to put pragmatic knowledge to use while engaging in
communicative acts
As described above social networking can be an informal
(Mitchell 2009 Stevenson amp Liu 2010) or formal learning tool in
blended or onlineenvironments Therole of social networking tools in
blended environments has been investigated less frequently than in
fully distant environments How and why faculty and students use
SNSs as part of blended environments warrants further study This
study is intended to contribute to our understanding of how SNSs can
be used to support blended learning environments as well as model
technology integration practices to future teachers More speci1047297cally
we wanted to investigate the following research questions
1 How did the students in this blended course use the Ning site
2 What were student perceptions of Ning
3 How did the modeling of Ning use impact students plans to use
CMC andor SNS tools in their future teaching
4 How were the instructor goals for the use of the site met
3 Methodology
31 Research design and data collection
A qualitative case study (Merriam 1998) was our strategy to
explore this blended learning environment Merriam (1998) empha-
sizes that qualitative design is emergent with a recursive dynamic
process of data collection and analysis After receiving IRB ap-
proval from both our institutions the following data sources were
gathered a student questionnaire the content of the Ning site and
student interviews All data collection instruments are available
upon request
The questionnaire was administered to the students at the end of
the quarter and gathered the following information (1) demograph-
ics (age gender native language and undergraduate or graduate
status) (2) type of previous language teaching experience (language
and level) and (3) previous experience learning languages with
instructional technology (language and technologies) Further to
assess their level of technology use participantswere asked to take an
online quiz available from the Pew Internet and American Life Project
which categorizes respondents as oneof ten types on their technology
user taxonomy (Horrigan 2007)
After grades were entered at the end of the term all content fromparticipating students was downloaded from the Ning site for analysis
This included nine memberpro1047297le pages 14 wall comments 143
discussion forum posts 81 blog posts and three group pages (with
nine commentsposts) Students position papers were also down-
loaded for analysis Completed towards the end of the course this
assignment required students to draw on information from the
professional literature as well as their own experiences in the course
to formulate their personal philosophy of the role CALL can play to
promote language learning
Allparticipants were invited to participate in a one hour interview
Four participants (Ruth Tsukiko Gary and Karen) agreed to be
interviewed To allow students to speak openly about their opinions
Dr Paulus the outside observer conducted the interviews Since she
was not located in the same state as the participants synchronousinstant messenger tools were used for the interviews Participants
chose the tool they were most comfortable with and a variety of tools
(Skype Yahoo and Gmail) were used These text-based interviews
were automatically archived for analysis
32 Participants
Eight of the ten students consented to participate in the research
study Pseudonyms are used throughout this paper As illustrated in
Table 1 two students were male and the rest were female Their ages
ranged from 20 to 26 and two were non-native speakers of English
Four were undergraduates and four were graduates They had a range
of previous teaching experiences and experiences learning with
technology While four participants were ldquo
omnivoresrdquo
(heavy users)
189N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 39
of technology according to the Pew taxonomyothers made less use of
technology in their daily lives Pavla who was classi1047297e d as
ldquoconnected but hassledrdquo represented the lowest level of technology
use of this class being at level 5 of the taxonomys ten levels
33 Data analysis
We analyzed the data in an inductive iterative manner using a
modi1047297ed form of the constant comparative method guided by the
research questions (Bogdan amp Biklen 2007 Strauss amp Corbin 1998)
Merriam (1998) outlines three phases in this type of qualitative data
analysis intensive analysis developing categories and developing
theory Since we were interested in how students used the Ning site
we calculated descriptive tallies of the communication that took place
in the site (eg number of posts and comments made) as well as
reading through and making notes on the content of the site We
compared our initial descriptive tallies and notes with questionnaire
responses interviews and position papers Intensive analysis began as
we read and re-read the data each making notes and re1047298ections to
isolate the most striking aspects comparing and noting themes
related to theresearchquestionsWe kept a list of the major ideas thatcut across the data searching for regularities and patterns similar to
open coding as described by Strauss and Corbin (1998) Units of data
were isolated and labeled in the margins of the paper transcripts in
preparation for the next phase of developing categories We then
developed our initial lists into categories Similar to axial coding
(Strauss amp Corbin 1998) we sorted the concrete units into more
abstract categories Through an iterative process of convergence and
divergence we organized emerging categories and subcategories
Finally through a process of selective coding we developed a tentative
set of 1047297ndings From the initial concrete codes we identi1047297ed abstract
themes which were then compared to the data and to the literature
until the 1047297nal iteration of 1047297ndings were agreed upon
34 Course context and design decisions
We now move to a description of the course and the design
decisions made by Dr Arnold the course instructor This description
was written prior to data collection and analysis and it is written in
the 1047297rst person
I teach in an applied linguistics department at a large urban
university in thePaci1047297c Northwest Our program is primarily designed
for future teachers of English as a secondforeign language and offers
an MA in TESOL (teaching English to speakers of other languages) At
the undergraduate level the majority of our students are enrolled in a
certi1047297cate program In the winter quarter 2009 I taught a course
called ldquoComputer Assisted Language Learningrdquo (CALL) This was the
1047297rst time the course was offered and it was cross-listed as an elective
for undergraduate and graduate credit To allow for the seamless
integration of technology during class time the course met in a
computer lab
In light of the fact that most of our students are planning to
become professional language educators the pedagogical aspect of
CALL wasmy main focusMore speci1047297cally I wanted to equip students
with a solid knowledge and skill foundation to make informed
decisions about whether and how to use CALL in their own teaching
One of the main pedagogical principles driving my design of this
course was experiential education I 1047297rst experienced instructional
technology in a graduate class where online discussions allowed me
to step out of my self-imposed role as an outsider and become a more
active participant This experience is the basis for my belief in the
power of experiencing an instructional approach or tool1047297rsthand For
this course this meant providing students with the opportunity to
experience a variety of technological tools as userslearners This
would allow them to experience 1047297rst hand the potential bene1047297ts and
drawbacks of instructional technology
In selecting the thematic focus of this class I chose tools that
(1)do notrequire a lot of technological expertise from theteacher and
learners (2) are commonly used by members of the Net Generation
(Oblinger amp Oblinger 2005) and (3) are available at no cost In my
experience training future language teachers these criteria cansigni1047297cantly facilitate the implementation of instructional technology
Ultimately I decided that I wanted my students to work with four
applications mdash blog chat wiki and online discussion Many course
management systems like Blackboard now offer features like blogs
chats wikis and online discussions While they are available to many
instructors af 1047297liated with large institutions (usually in higher
education) they are not usually not an option for teachers in the
public school system Therefore I searched for an alternative that
would be more accessible to these future teachers
I also wanted to provide an online presence for the course I
envisioned this online presence mainly as an information resource
(similar to a course management system) as well as a portal for all the
tools that students would be working with Community building a
common reason for using SNSs was not a signi1047297cant factor in thisdecision-making process I felt that our class meetings which were all
conducted face-to-face would be the primary force in promoting a
supportive learning community
Social networking and group sites often include the tools I wanted
to use I decided against Facebook or MySpace because of their focus on
individual pro1047297les Joining Facebook requires creating an individual
pro1047297le after which users add friends join groups provide status
updates and comment on others activities My intention however
was 1047297rst and foremost to create a space for the class as a whole Ning
in contrast is group-centered somebody creates a site for a group
before inviting potential members to join the group While each Ning
site can be set up with blogs chats and online discussions it does not
include a wiki feature Unfortunately no other SNS or group site
offered all the features I was looking for so I settled for Ning and
Table 1
Description of participants
Name of
participant
Age N at ive
language
Status Type of previous teaching
experience
Previous experience learning
with instructional technology
Level of technology use Participated
in interview
Karen 23 English Graduate College level ESL Software for learning German Omnivore X
Pavla 21 Russian Under-gradu ate No teaching experience Course management s ystem Connected but hassled ndash
Alissa 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Productivity enhancer ndash
Ruth 25 English Under-graduate Tutoring ESL Online exercises and tests for
learning Spanish
Connector X
Gary 24 English Graduate College level Japanese Audio and notes of class lectures Omnivore XAnette 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Omnivore ndash
Tsukiko 25 Japanese Under-graduate Elementary school Japanese Software for learning English Omnivore X
Car l 20 En glish Under -g raduat e No te aching exper ience Sof twar e f or learning Spanish +cour se
management system
Lackluster veteran ndash
190 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 49
supplemented it with an outside wiki tool Fig 1 is a screen shot of the
main Ning page
At the beginning of the course I encouraged students to make the
Ning site their own and use it in whatever way they saw 1047297t I also
encouraged students to experiment with and tailor the tools made
availableto them through Ning when they were getting ready to work
on their group projects To facilitate collaboration I set up an outside
wiki and a separate page for each group on our Ning site Each group
then picked the features of their page (eg they decided if theywanted to have a discussion board on their group page)
After registering a personal page is set up for each user During
this process the user must respond to a series of pro1047297le questions
determined by the sites administrator To promote a feeling of
ownership I asked the students to decide which questions to include
to facilitate their getting to know each other This information was
then visible on each individual pro1047297le student status teaching
experience reason for taking the class goals for the class how they
currently use technology Delicious user name (a bookmarking site we
used in class) and membership status in other SNSs (eg Facebook)
4 Findings
Next we describe how students used the Ning site their
perceptions of the site how they plan to use technology in their
future teaching and how well the site helped the instructor reach the
goals for her course
41 Research question 1 student use of the Ning site
Pro1047297le pages ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posts are common features of
SNSs In this class students pro1047297le pages were personalized with
eight of the 10 students uploading photos and changing the
background and format of their pro1047297les In Ning ldquofriendingrdquo a
member of the social network allows you to exchange private
messages Wall posts are another way of communicating with other
members but the messages are visible to all members of the social
network All participants in this study friended at least one other
student in the class and all friended the instructor Fourteen wall
comments were made throughout the quarter and these were
primarily small talk or logistic in nature such as asking about
assignments missed during an absence
Most of the studentndashstudentndashinstructor conversations took place
in the Ning discussion forums Eleven forums were created by theinstructor and the class made a total of 143 posts Three of these
forums were used only by the instructor and their purpose was for
the instructor to share 1047297les with the students as there was no other
wayto upload1047297les to the Ning site Another three forumshad only one
post per student The 1047297ve forums with the greatest levels of
interaction had structured tasks for the students which required
feedback from their peers See Table 2 for task details
Overall the site did not have a high level of visible student-to-
student interaction beyond what was required by these assigned
tasks Some students were much more active than others Karen and
Gary both ldquoomnivoresrdquo posted most often (20 and 19 times
respectively) and Pavla who described herself as ldquoconnected but
hassledrdquo posted a good deal as well (16 times) (see Table 3)
The blog feature was also heavily used with 81 blog posts made
during the quarter This resulted from each student making 10
re1047298ective posts as assigned plus an additional post made by the
instructor Thegroup sites were used hardlyat all Whilethe instructor
advised groups to set up a group page it was the students who chose
whether and how to customize and utilize their pages (eg decided
which tools to feature on their page) All groups selected a pro1047297le
picture for their group which indicates at least initial intentions to
personalize and use the site Activity on the group sites was very
limited however All three groups did what the instructor had
recommended namely formulate a plan for the group project and
postit onthe group page Ofa total ofnineposts fourcan beattributed
Fig 1 Screen shot of Ning Site
191N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 59
to this type of organizing The remaining posts were to share resources
(2) refer group members to the wiki for new content added to theproject (1) and to thank group members for their work (2)
In summary unlike SNSs such as Facebook the friending and wall
post features were not heavily used The intended purpose for the
Ning site was to serve as a central repository for course materials and
submission of assignments in a public venue Visible interaction took
place in thediscussion forum andblogs as responses to assigned tasks
rather than as wall posts or student-initiated blog entries However
while not required to do so students reported in the interviews that
by virtue of the posts being publicly visible they were motivated to
read each others re1047298ective posts and assignments This 1047297nding is
explored in the next section
42 Research question 2 student perceptions of the Ning site
Overall the students felt that Ning operated as a ldquohubrdquo for the class
and was a ldquofresh alternative to Blackboardrdquo (Gary) Anette reported
that Ning was ldquoa great way to communicate and store informationrdquo
and sheldquoliked being able to refer to the site any time for info on classrdquo
Students would have liked Ning to have a calendar feature and some
felt that the design was not very intuitive for new users Although the
instructor was instrumental in organizing the Ning site she was not
heavily involved in the studentndashstudent interactions taking place
either during the chats or in the forums Students felt that the
instructor wanted it to be more of a student space where she would
facilitate but not dominate Three themes capture the student
perceptions of the Ning site community building modelingfeedback
and authenticity
421 Community building
While not an explicit goal of the instructor students felt that theirindividual pro1047297les encouraged bonding among students Unlike most
course management systems Ning allowed students to upload a pro1047297le
picture which was displayed as an identi1047297er whenever they posted
content to the site According to Karen being able to easily identify the
author of a post ldquomade for more community We knew everyones
name and we could link a person to their post betterrdquo Ruth described
When you share a special place like that I feel it bonds you in a
way And when youre bonded like that I feel your [sic] more likely
to care about your classmates which creates a better class
environment which promotes student success
Ning also made it easier for students to contact each other outside
of class when they needed to Gary explained ldquoThere were times
when students would miss a class and could ask for the notes or
assistance on an individuals lsquowallrsquordquo He also felt
it was a little challenging to lsquoopen-uprsquo and talk about personal
feelings towards problems andor situationsbut by being able to
do this in a blogwritten format helped and knowing that the
other students were going to be doing the same thing reduced the
anxiety
Ruth concurred that ldquopeople who did not often speak up in class
did so during these chat [making] comments that were more open
especiallyabout how certain words and phrases made us feel based
on our culturerdquo Thus even in this blended environment where
students met face-to-face Ning added to the sense of community
among students
422 Modeling and feedback
Having student work publicly available was felt to be a good way
to provide modeling in that students could see how others were
approaching the assignments Tsukiko explained ldquoSometimes I wasnt
sure what I needed to write But I read couple other students posting
to get the ideas of the assignment and what I needed to include in my
postingrdquo Students claimed to read each others work more than they
usually would even though they didnt necessarily respond to this
work with additional posts or comments Karen said ldquoI think I read
more than I normally would have Normally I dont read others posts
unless that is part of the assignmentthe homepage gave you a taste
and then you got curiousrdquo Apparently the list of latest activity on the
Ning homepage (eg blurbs of recent posts) not only allowed
Table 3
Number of posts and comments in discussion forum
Participant Number of forum posts made
Instructor 33
Karen 20
Gary 19
Pavla 16
Carl 15
Tsukiko 13
Alissa 11
Ruth 10
Anette 6
Total 143
Table 2
Most active discussion forum tasks and number of posts
Task description Number of posts
Post the 1047297le with your CALL activity as an attachment to a posting in this message board If you have any speci 1047297c
questions for the reviewer include them in the post Review the activity designed by one of your classmates
Pretend to be a learner and work through the whole activity It is important to provide detailed constructive
and honest feedback she can use to revise the activity before turning it in for a grade Here are some guiding
questions [9 questions included here] Post your feedback as a reply to the original message with the 1047297le
Your evaluation counts as a participation grade
27
Discuss the pedagogical pros and cons of annotations transcripts visual input (ie video+audio instead of audio only)the learners ability to pausereplay collaboration among learners and the use of authentic materials
Be sure to make this an interactive discussion Post your 1047297rst message by Thursday 12 noon
At least 3 messages are expected from each student
22
Post your CMC Activity here for peer review 18
Post the URL for your online text here 18
There are three phases to this assignment
1) Group A makes a list of keywords from the chapter and posts it in this forum
2) Group B assigns the keywords in Group As list to broader categories Reply to Group As original post
3) Group C works on an annotated list of based on the categorized list produced by Group B (originally made by Group A)
Statements should be added to the keywords to provide a short summary of what Chun reports regarding these issues
12
192 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 39
of technology according to the Pew taxonomyothers made less use of
technology in their daily lives Pavla who was classi1047297e d as
ldquoconnected but hassledrdquo represented the lowest level of technology
use of this class being at level 5 of the taxonomys ten levels
33 Data analysis
We analyzed the data in an inductive iterative manner using a
modi1047297ed form of the constant comparative method guided by the
research questions (Bogdan amp Biklen 2007 Strauss amp Corbin 1998)
Merriam (1998) outlines three phases in this type of qualitative data
analysis intensive analysis developing categories and developing
theory Since we were interested in how students used the Ning site
we calculated descriptive tallies of the communication that took place
in the site (eg number of posts and comments made) as well as
reading through and making notes on the content of the site We
compared our initial descriptive tallies and notes with questionnaire
responses interviews and position papers Intensive analysis began as
we read and re-read the data each making notes and re1047298ections to
isolate the most striking aspects comparing and noting themes
related to theresearchquestionsWe kept a list of the major ideas thatcut across the data searching for regularities and patterns similar to
open coding as described by Strauss and Corbin (1998) Units of data
were isolated and labeled in the margins of the paper transcripts in
preparation for the next phase of developing categories We then
developed our initial lists into categories Similar to axial coding
(Strauss amp Corbin 1998) we sorted the concrete units into more
abstract categories Through an iterative process of convergence and
divergence we organized emerging categories and subcategories
Finally through a process of selective coding we developed a tentative
set of 1047297ndings From the initial concrete codes we identi1047297ed abstract
themes which were then compared to the data and to the literature
until the 1047297nal iteration of 1047297ndings were agreed upon
34 Course context and design decisions
We now move to a description of the course and the design
decisions made by Dr Arnold the course instructor This description
was written prior to data collection and analysis and it is written in
the 1047297rst person
I teach in an applied linguistics department at a large urban
university in thePaci1047297c Northwest Our program is primarily designed
for future teachers of English as a secondforeign language and offers
an MA in TESOL (teaching English to speakers of other languages) At
the undergraduate level the majority of our students are enrolled in a
certi1047297cate program In the winter quarter 2009 I taught a course
called ldquoComputer Assisted Language Learningrdquo (CALL) This was the
1047297rst time the course was offered and it was cross-listed as an elective
for undergraduate and graduate credit To allow for the seamless
integration of technology during class time the course met in a
computer lab
In light of the fact that most of our students are planning to
become professional language educators the pedagogical aspect of
CALL wasmy main focusMore speci1047297cally I wanted to equip students
with a solid knowledge and skill foundation to make informed
decisions about whether and how to use CALL in their own teaching
One of the main pedagogical principles driving my design of this
course was experiential education I 1047297rst experienced instructional
technology in a graduate class where online discussions allowed me
to step out of my self-imposed role as an outsider and become a more
active participant This experience is the basis for my belief in the
power of experiencing an instructional approach or tool1047297rsthand For
this course this meant providing students with the opportunity to
experience a variety of technological tools as userslearners This
would allow them to experience 1047297rst hand the potential bene1047297ts and
drawbacks of instructional technology
In selecting the thematic focus of this class I chose tools that
(1)do notrequire a lot of technological expertise from theteacher and
learners (2) are commonly used by members of the Net Generation
(Oblinger amp Oblinger 2005) and (3) are available at no cost In my
experience training future language teachers these criteria cansigni1047297cantly facilitate the implementation of instructional technology
Ultimately I decided that I wanted my students to work with four
applications mdash blog chat wiki and online discussion Many course
management systems like Blackboard now offer features like blogs
chats wikis and online discussions While they are available to many
instructors af 1047297liated with large institutions (usually in higher
education) they are not usually not an option for teachers in the
public school system Therefore I searched for an alternative that
would be more accessible to these future teachers
I also wanted to provide an online presence for the course I
envisioned this online presence mainly as an information resource
(similar to a course management system) as well as a portal for all the
tools that students would be working with Community building a
common reason for using SNSs was not a signi1047297cant factor in thisdecision-making process I felt that our class meetings which were all
conducted face-to-face would be the primary force in promoting a
supportive learning community
Social networking and group sites often include the tools I wanted
to use I decided against Facebook or MySpace because of their focus on
individual pro1047297les Joining Facebook requires creating an individual
pro1047297le after which users add friends join groups provide status
updates and comment on others activities My intention however
was 1047297rst and foremost to create a space for the class as a whole Ning
in contrast is group-centered somebody creates a site for a group
before inviting potential members to join the group While each Ning
site can be set up with blogs chats and online discussions it does not
include a wiki feature Unfortunately no other SNS or group site
offered all the features I was looking for so I settled for Ning and
Table 1
Description of participants
Name of
participant
Age N at ive
language
Status Type of previous teaching
experience
Previous experience learning
with instructional technology
Level of technology use Participated
in interview
Karen 23 English Graduate College level ESL Software for learning German Omnivore X
Pavla 21 Russian Under-gradu ate No teaching experience Course management s ystem Connected but hassled ndash
Alissa 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Productivity enhancer ndash
Ruth 25 English Under-graduate Tutoring ESL Online exercises and tests for
learning Spanish
Connector X
Gary 24 English Graduate College level Japanese Audio and notes of class lectures Omnivore XAnette 26 English Graduate No teaching experience No experience Omnivore ndash
Tsukiko 25 Japanese Under-graduate Elementary school Japanese Software for learning English Omnivore X
Car l 20 En glish Under -g raduat e No te aching exper ience Sof twar e f or learning Spanish +cour se
management system
Lackluster veteran ndash
190 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 49
supplemented it with an outside wiki tool Fig 1 is a screen shot of the
main Ning page
At the beginning of the course I encouraged students to make the
Ning site their own and use it in whatever way they saw 1047297t I also
encouraged students to experiment with and tailor the tools made
availableto them through Ning when they were getting ready to work
on their group projects To facilitate collaboration I set up an outside
wiki and a separate page for each group on our Ning site Each group
then picked the features of their page (eg they decided if theywanted to have a discussion board on their group page)
After registering a personal page is set up for each user During
this process the user must respond to a series of pro1047297le questions
determined by the sites administrator To promote a feeling of
ownership I asked the students to decide which questions to include
to facilitate their getting to know each other This information was
then visible on each individual pro1047297le student status teaching
experience reason for taking the class goals for the class how they
currently use technology Delicious user name (a bookmarking site we
used in class) and membership status in other SNSs (eg Facebook)
4 Findings
Next we describe how students used the Ning site their
perceptions of the site how they plan to use technology in their
future teaching and how well the site helped the instructor reach the
goals for her course
41 Research question 1 student use of the Ning site
Pro1047297le pages ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posts are common features of
SNSs In this class students pro1047297le pages were personalized with
eight of the 10 students uploading photos and changing the
background and format of their pro1047297les In Ning ldquofriendingrdquo a
member of the social network allows you to exchange private
messages Wall posts are another way of communicating with other
members but the messages are visible to all members of the social
network All participants in this study friended at least one other
student in the class and all friended the instructor Fourteen wall
comments were made throughout the quarter and these were
primarily small talk or logistic in nature such as asking about
assignments missed during an absence
Most of the studentndashstudentndashinstructor conversations took place
in the Ning discussion forums Eleven forums were created by theinstructor and the class made a total of 143 posts Three of these
forums were used only by the instructor and their purpose was for
the instructor to share 1047297les with the students as there was no other
wayto upload1047297les to the Ning site Another three forumshad only one
post per student The 1047297ve forums with the greatest levels of
interaction had structured tasks for the students which required
feedback from their peers See Table 2 for task details
Overall the site did not have a high level of visible student-to-
student interaction beyond what was required by these assigned
tasks Some students were much more active than others Karen and
Gary both ldquoomnivoresrdquo posted most often (20 and 19 times
respectively) and Pavla who described herself as ldquoconnected but
hassledrdquo posted a good deal as well (16 times) (see Table 3)
The blog feature was also heavily used with 81 blog posts made
during the quarter This resulted from each student making 10
re1047298ective posts as assigned plus an additional post made by the
instructor Thegroup sites were used hardlyat all Whilethe instructor
advised groups to set up a group page it was the students who chose
whether and how to customize and utilize their pages (eg decided
which tools to feature on their page) All groups selected a pro1047297le
picture for their group which indicates at least initial intentions to
personalize and use the site Activity on the group sites was very
limited however All three groups did what the instructor had
recommended namely formulate a plan for the group project and
postit onthe group page Ofa total ofnineposts fourcan beattributed
Fig 1 Screen shot of Ning Site
191N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 59
to this type of organizing The remaining posts were to share resources
(2) refer group members to the wiki for new content added to theproject (1) and to thank group members for their work (2)
In summary unlike SNSs such as Facebook the friending and wall
post features were not heavily used The intended purpose for the
Ning site was to serve as a central repository for course materials and
submission of assignments in a public venue Visible interaction took
place in thediscussion forum andblogs as responses to assigned tasks
rather than as wall posts or student-initiated blog entries However
while not required to do so students reported in the interviews that
by virtue of the posts being publicly visible they were motivated to
read each others re1047298ective posts and assignments This 1047297nding is
explored in the next section
42 Research question 2 student perceptions of the Ning site
Overall the students felt that Ning operated as a ldquohubrdquo for the class
and was a ldquofresh alternative to Blackboardrdquo (Gary) Anette reported
that Ning was ldquoa great way to communicate and store informationrdquo
and sheldquoliked being able to refer to the site any time for info on classrdquo
Students would have liked Ning to have a calendar feature and some
felt that the design was not very intuitive for new users Although the
instructor was instrumental in organizing the Ning site she was not
heavily involved in the studentndashstudent interactions taking place
either during the chats or in the forums Students felt that the
instructor wanted it to be more of a student space where she would
facilitate but not dominate Three themes capture the student
perceptions of the Ning site community building modelingfeedback
and authenticity
421 Community building
While not an explicit goal of the instructor students felt that theirindividual pro1047297les encouraged bonding among students Unlike most
course management systems Ning allowed students to upload a pro1047297le
picture which was displayed as an identi1047297er whenever they posted
content to the site According to Karen being able to easily identify the
author of a post ldquomade for more community We knew everyones
name and we could link a person to their post betterrdquo Ruth described
When you share a special place like that I feel it bonds you in a
way And when youre bonded like that I feel your [sic] more likely
to care about your classmates which creates a better class
environment which promotes student success
Ning also made it easier for students to contact each other outside
of class when they needed to Gary explained ldquoThere were times
when students would miss a class and could ask for the notes or
assistance on an individuals lsquowallrsquordquo He also felt
it was a little challenging to lsquoopen-uprsquo and talk about personal
feelings towards problems andor situationsbut by being able to
do this in a blogwritten format helped and knowing that the
other students were going to be doing the same thing reduced the
anxiety
Ruth concurred that ldquopeople who did not often speak up in class
did so during these chat [making] comments that were more open
especiallyabout how certain words and phrases made us feel based
on our culturerdquo Thus even in this blended environment where
students met face-to-face Ning added to the sense of community
among students
422 Modeling and feedback
Having student work publicly available was felt to be a good way
to provide modeling in that students could see how others were
approaching the assignments Tsukiko explained ldquoSometimes I wasnt
sure what I needed to write But I read couple other students posting
to get the ideas of the assignment and what I needed to include in my
postingrdquo Students claimed to read each others work more than they
usually would even though they didnt necessarily respond to this
work with additional posts or comments Karen said ldquoI think I read
more than I normally would have Normally I dont read others posts
unless that is part of the assignmentthe homepage gave you a taste
and then you got curiousrdquo Apparently the list of latest activity on the
Ning homepage (eg blurbs of recent posts) not only allowed
Table 3
Number of posts and comments in discussion forum
Participant Number of forum posts made
Instructor 33
Karen 20
Gary 19
Pavla 16
Carl 15
Tsukiko 13
Alissa 11
Ruth 10
Anette 6
Total 143
Table 2
Most active discussion forum tasks and number of posts
Task description Number of posts
Post the 1047297le with your CALL activity as an attachment to a posting in this message board If you have any speci 1047297c
questions for the reviewer include them in the post Review the activity designed by one of your classmates
Pretend to be a learner and work through the whole activity It is important to provide detailed constructive
and honest feedback she can use to revise the activity before turning it in for a grade Here are some guiding
questions [9 questions included here] Post your feedback as a reply to the original message with the 1047297le
Your evaluation counts as a participation grade
27
Discuss the pedagogical pros and cons of annotations transcripts visual input (ie video+audio instead of audio only)the learners ability to pausereplay collaboration among learners and the use of authentic materials
Be sure to make this an interactive discussion Post your 1047297rst message by Thursday 12 noon
At least 3 messages are expected from each student
22
Post your CMC Activity here for peer review 18
Post the URL for your online text here 18
There are three phases to this assignment
1) Group A makes a list of keywords from the chapter and posts it in this forum
2) Group B assigns the keywords in Group As list to broader categories Reply to Group As original post
3) Group C works on an annotated list of based on the categorized list produced by Group B (originally made by Group A)
Statements should be added to the keywords to provide a short summary of what Chun reports regarding these issues
12
192 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 49
supplemented it with an outside wiki tool Fig 1 is a screen shot of the
main Ning page
At the beginning of the course I encouraged students to make the
Ning site their own and use it in whatever way they saw 1047297t I also
encouraged students to experiment with and tailor the tools made
availableto them through Ning when they were getting ready to work
on their group projects To facilitate collaboration I set up an outside
wiki and a separate page for each group on our Ning site Each group
then picked the features of their page (eg they decided if theywanted to have a discussion board on their group page)
After registering a personal page is set up for each user During
this process the user must respond to a series of pro1047297le questions
determined by the sites administrator To promote a feeling of
ownership I asked the students to decide which questions to include
to facilitate their getting to know each other This information was
then visible on each individual pro1047297le student status teaching
experience reason for taking the class goals for the class how they
currently use technology Delicious user name (a bookmarking site we
used in class) and membership status in other SNSs (eg Facebook)
4 Findings
Next we describe how students used the Ning site their
perceptions of the site how they plan to use technology in their
future teaching and how well the site helped the instructor reach the
goals for her course
41 Research question 1 student use of the Ning site
Pro1047297le pages ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posts are common features of
SNSs In this class students pro1047297le pages were personalized with
eight of the 10 students uploading photos and changing the
background and format of their pro1047297les In Ning ldquofriendingrdquo a
member of the social network allows you to exchange private
messages Wall posts are another way of communicating with other
members but the messages are visible to all members of the social
network All participants in this study friended at least one other
student in the class and all friended the instructor Fourteen wall
comments were made throughout the quarter and these were
primarily small talk or logistic in nature such as asking about
assignments missed during an absence
Most of the studentndashstudentndashinstructor conversations took place
in the Ning discussion forums Eleven forums were created by theinstructor and the class made a total of 143 posts Three of these
forums were used only by the instructor and their purpose was for
the instructor to share 1047297les with the students as there was no other
wayto upload1047297les to the Ning site Another three forumshad only one
post per student The 1047297ve forums with the greatest levels of
interaction had structured tasks for the students which required
feedback from their peers See Table 2 for task details
Overall the site did not have a high level of visible student-to-
student interaction beyond what was required by these assigned
tasks Some students were much more active than others Karen and
Gary both ldquoomnivoresrdquo posted most often (20 and 19 times
respectively) and Pavla who described herself as ldquoconnected but
hassledrdquo posted a good deal as well (16 times) (see Table 3)
The blog feature was also heavily used with 81 blog posts made
during the quarter This resulted from each student making 10
re1047298ective posts as assigned plus an additional post made by the
instructor Thegroup sites were used hardlyat all Whilethe instructor
advised groups to set up a group page it was the students who chose
whether and how to customize and utilize their pages (eg decided
which tools to feature on their page) All groups selected a pro1047297le
picture for their group which indicates at least initial intentions to
personalize and use the site Activity on the group sites was very
limited however All three groups did what the instructor had
recommended namely formulate a plan for the group project and
postit onthe group page Ofa total ofnineposts fourcan beattributed
Fig 1 Screen shot of Ning Site
191N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 59
to this type of organizing The remaining posts were to share resources
(2) refer group members to the wiki for new content added to theproject (1) and to thank group members for their work (2)
In summary unlike SNSs such as Facebook the friending and wall
post features were not heavily used The intended purpose for the
Ning site was to serve as a central repository for course materials and
submission of assignments in a public venue Visible interaction took
place in thediscussion forum andblogs as responses to assigned tasks
rather than as wall posts or student-initiated blog entries However
while not required to do so students reported in the interviews that
by virtue of the posts being publicly visible they were motivated to
read each others re1047298ective posts and assignments This 1047297nding is
explored in the next section
42 Research question 2 student perceptions of the Ning site
Overall the students felt that Ning operated as a ldquohubrdquo for the class
and was a ldquofresh alternative to Blackboardrdquo (Gary) Anette reported
that Ning was ldquoa great way to communicate and store informationrdquo
and sheldquoliked being able to refer to the site any time for info on classrdquo
Students would have liked Ning to have a calendar feature and some
felt that the design was not very intuitive for new users Although the
instructor was instrumental in organizing the Ning site she was not
heavily involved in the studentndashstudent interactions taking place
either during the chats or in the forums Students felt that the
instructor wanted it to be more of a student space where she would
facilitate but not dominate Three themes capture the student
perceptions of the Ning site community building modelingfeedback
and authenticity
421 Community building
While not an explicit goal of the instructor students felt that theirindividual pro1047297les encouraged bonding among students Unlike most
course management systems Ning allowed students to upload a pro1047297le
picture which was displayed as an identi1047297er whenever they posted
content to the site According to Karen being able to easily identify the
author of a post ldquomade for more community We knew everyones
name and we could link a person to their post betterrdquo Ruth described
When you share a special place like that I feel it bonds you in a
way And when youre bonded like that I feel your [sic] more likely
to care about your classmates which creates a better class
environment which promotes student success
Ning also made it easier for students to contact each other outside
of class when they needed to Gary explained ldquoThere were times
when students would miss a class and could ask for the notes or
assistance on an individuals lsquowallrsquordquo He also felt
it was a little challenging to lsquoopen-uprsquo and talk about personal
feelings towards problems andor situationsbut by being able to
do this in a blogwritten format helped and knowing that the
other students were going to be doing the same thing reduced the
anxiety
Ruth concurred that ldquopeople who did not often speak up in class
did so during these chat [making] comments that were more open
especiallyabout how certain words and phrases made us feel based
on our culturerdquo Thus even in this blended environment where
students met face-to-face Ning added to the sense of community
among students
422 Modeling and feedback
Having student work publicly available was felt to be a good way
to provide modeling in that students could see how others were
approaching the assignments Tsukiko explained ldquoSometimes I wasnt
sure what I needed to write But I read couple other students posting
to get the ideas of the assignment and what I needed to include in my
postingrdquo Students claimed to read each others work more than they
usually would even though they didnt necessarily respond to this
work with additional posts or comments Karen said ldquoI think I read
more than I normally would have Normally I dont read others posts
unless that is part of the assignmentthe homepage gave you a taste
and then you got curiousrdquo Apparently the list of latest activity on the
Ning homepage (eg blurbs of recent posts) not only allowed
Table 3
Number of posts and comments in discussion forum
Participant Number of forum posts made
Instructor 33
Karen 20
Gary 19
Pavla 16
Carl 15
Tsukiko 13
Alissa 11
Ruth 10
Anette 6
Total 143
Table 2
Most active discussion forum tasks and number of posts
Task description Number of posts
Post the 1047297le with your CALL activity as an attachment to a posting in this message board If you have any speci 1047297c
questions for the reviewer include them in the post Review the activity designed by one of your classmates
Pretend to be a learner and work through the whole activity It is important to provide detailed constructive
and honest feedback she can use to revise the activity before turning it in for a grade Here are some guiding
questions [9 questions included here] Post your feedback as a reply to the original message with the 1047297le
Your evaluation counts as a participation grade
27
Discuss the pedagogical pros and cons of annotations transcripts visual input (ie video+audio instead of audio only)the learners ability to pausereplay collaboration among learners and the use of authentic materials
Be sure to make this an interactive discussion Post your 1047297rst message by Thursday 12 noon
At least 3 messages are expected from each student
22
Post your CMC Activity here for peer review 18
Post the URL for your online text here 18
There are three phases to this assignment
1) Group A makes a list of keywords from the chapter and posts it in this forum
2) Group B assigns the keywords in Group As list to broader categories Reply to Group As original post
3) Group C works on an annotated list of based on the categorized list produced by Group B (originally made by Group A)
Statements should be added to the keywords to provide a short summary of what Chun reports regarding these issues
12
192 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 59
to this type of organizing The remaining posts were to share resources
(2) refer group members to the wiki for new content added to theproject (1) and to thank group members for their work (2)
In summary unlike SNSs such as Facebook the friending and wall
post features were not heavily used The intended purpose for the
Ning site was to serve as a central repository for course materials and
submission of assignments in a public venue Visible interaction took
place in thediscussion forum andblogs as responses to assigned tasks
rather than as wall posts or student-initiated blog entries However
while not required to do so students reported in the interviews that
by virtue of the posts being publicly visible they were motivated to
read each others re1047298ective posts and assignments This 1047297nding is
explored in the next section
42 Research question 2 student perceptions of the Ning site
Overall the students felt that Ning operated as a ldquohubrdquo for the class
and was a ldquofresh alternative to Blackboardrdquo (Gary) Anette reported
that Ning was ldquoa great way to communicate and store informationrdquo
and sheldquoliked being able to refer to the site any time for info on classrdquo
Students would have liked Ning to have a calendar feature and some
felt that the design was not very intuitive for new users Although the
instructor was instrumental in organizing the Ning site she was not
heavily involved in the studentndashstudent interactions taking place
either during the chats or in the forums Students felt that the
instructor wanted it to be more of a student space where she would
facilitate but not dominate Three themes capture the student
perceptions of the Ning site community building modelingfeedback
and authenticity
421 Community building
While not an explicit goal of the instructor students felt that theirindividual pro1047297les encouraged bonding among students Unlike most
course management systems Ning allowed students to upload a pro1047297le
picture which was displayed as an identi1047297er whenever they posted
content to the site According to Karen being able to easily identify the
author of a post ldquomade for more community We knew everyones
name and we could link a person to their post betterrdquo Ruth described
When you share a special place like that I feel it bonds you in a
way And when youre bonded like that I feel your [sic] more likely
to care about your classmates which creates a better class
environment which promotes student success
Ning also made it easier for students to contact each other outside
of class when they needed to Gary explained ldquoThere were times
when students would miss a class and could ask for the notes or
assistance on an individuals lsquowallrsquordquo He also felt
it was a little challenging to lsquoopen-uprsquo and talk about personal
feelings towards problems andor situationsbut by being able to
do this in a blogwritten format helped and knowing that the
other students were going to be doing the same thing reduced the
anxiety
Ruth concurred that ldquopeople who did not often speak up in class
did so during these chat [making] comments that were more open
especiallyabout how certain words and phrases made us feel based
on our culturerdquo Thus even in this blended environment where
students met face-to-face Ning added to the sense of community
among students
422 Modeling and feedback
Having student work publicly available was felt to be a good way
to provide modeling in that students could see how others were
approaching the assignments Tsukiko explained ldquoSometimes I wasnt
sure what I needed to write But I read couple other students posting
to get the ideas of the assignment and what I needed to include in my
postingrdquo Students claimed to read each others work more than they
usually would even though they didnt necessarily respond to this
work with additional posts or comments Karen said ldquoI think I read
more than I normally would have Normally I dont read others posts
unless that is part of the assignmentthe homepage gave you a taste
and then you got curiousrdquo Apparently the list of latest activity on the
Ning homepage (eg blurbs of recent posts) not only allowed
Table 3
Number of posts and comments in discussion forum
Participant Number of forum posts made
Instructor 33
Karen 20
Gary 19
Pavla 16
Carl 15
Tsukiko 13
Alissa 11
Ruth 10
Anette 6
Total 143
Table 2
Most active discussion forum tasks and number of posts
Task description Number of posts
Post the 1047297le with your CALL activity as an attachment to a posting in this message board If you have any speci 1047297c
questions for the reviewer include them in the post Review the activity designed by one of your classmates
Pretend to be a learner and work through the whole activity It is important to provide detailed constructive
and honest feedback she can use to revise the activity before turning it in for a grade Here are some guiding
questions [9 questions included here] Post your feedback as a reply to the original message with the 1047297le
Your evaluation counts as a participation grade
27
Discuss the pedagogical pros and cons of annotations transcripts visual input (ie video+audio instead of audio only)the learners ability to pausereplay collaboration among learners and the use of authentic materials
Be sure to make this an interactive discussion Post your 1047297rst message by Thursday 12 noon
At least 3 messages are expected from each student
22
Post your CMC Activity here for peer review 18
Post the URL for your online text here 18
There are three phases to this assignment
1) Group A makes a list of keywords from the chapter and posts it in this forum
2) Group B assigns the keywords in Group As list to broader categories Reply to Group As original post
3) Group C works on an annotated list of based on the categorized list produced by Group B (originally made by Group A)
Statements should be added to the keywords to provide a short summary of what Chun reports regarding these issues
12
192 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 69
students a quick overview but also encouraged them to review each
others contributions
When required to give feedback it was more thorough critical
feedback than it would otherwise have been Karen explained
ldquoSometimes we would comment on each others lessonsand that
was really helpful It seemed to be a little bit more well thought out
then if we would have just shared in class and given criticismrdquo
Having peer feedback posted in Ning then made it easier to revise
their work Ruth felt that ldquo
it was nice to have a way to look at whatclassmates said later especially in the case when we would give
peer feedback It made it much easier to revise your assignments
that wayrdquo It also supported re1047298ection in that they could re1047298ect on
their blog posts and see their progress over time Tsukiko explained
ldquoThe 1047297rst couple re1047298ections were about my thoughts towards
technology And last couple re1047298ections were about the same topics
I was surprised how my thoughts had changed in 10 weeks rdquo Thus
we see that students went beyond what was required by the
instructor reading each others posts and providing feedback in
more depth than would be possible during the face-to-face class
session
423 Authenticity
Of all the Ning activities the chats were seen as least helpful due
to a perceived lack of authenticity Karen explained ldquoI wasnt
particularly fond of chatting in classit seemed pointless thats why I
dont think chat works It is arti1047297cial Its hard to chat with people
you are in the same room withrdquo Ruth admitted to having a similar
attitude at least initially ldquoit was a little strange being in the same
roombut the more we used it the more I realized that it helped
shyer students talk morerdquo Ruths opinion changed over time as she
noticed some of the affordances of chat such as building community
among participants This is one example of a student evaluating the
pedagogical potential of a tool based on her personal experience as a
user which was the main goal for integrating experiential learning
into this course
Tsukiko was critical of the fast pace of chats revealing that as a
non-native speaker ldquoit was very dif 1047297cult for me I could not think fast
enough to make a sentence in Englishpeople were talking way fasterthan merdquo As a result she reported that she would carefully consider
group size when using chat in her own teaching ldquoIf I need to use
chatting I will only use it to do the activity wit [sic] partner If there
are more than couple students using chat at a one time students will
notbe able to communicate wellrdquo Tsukiko appears hesitant to usethis
type of CMC for language teaching as evident in her choiceof the verb
lsquoneedrsquo
While students were most critical of their experience with
synchronous CMC they did see educational potential in chats blogs
and discussion boards Students plans for using technology in their
own teaching are described next
43 Research question 3 students plans to use CMC in their future
teaching
The students described concrete ways that they would use CMC
tools such as Ning in their own classrooms In many cases their ideas
mirrored the Ning implementation for this course which focused on
posting instructor and student generated materials and creating an
interactive online space Tsukiko for example felt that she ldquowould
post all the assignments and materials for my students I would like
my students to post some of their homework and give and get
feedback or comments from other studentsrdquo However students also
reported their intentions to use a SNS and CMC in ways that extended
how it was used in this course One example is for community
building mdash not one of the instructors goals but a potential use
identi1047297ed by the students Karen said ldquoI will use [Ning ] (for my own
teaching)it is a great way to create communityrdquo
Ruth expressed
similar plans when she said she liked ldquothe idea of my future students
having a community like that mdash with personal pro1047297les and highlights
of who they are and what they want to accomplishrdquo
Experiencing a variety of CMC tools allowed students to get ideas
for assignments that extended the instructors use Ruth for example
might use blogs in a less structured way ldquoI would also have my
students blog somehow mdash either journals like we did or even more of
a free writerdquo She also plans to use chat outside of class similar to
Karen who ldquo
might also do chat with people from another areardquo
Thisseems to directly build on their experience as learners1047297nding ways to
more authentically use synchronous chat by conducting it outside of
class or with people at another location
Students reported that the hands-on approach to learning the
technology was bene1047297cial especially for easing non-1047298uent technology
users into the experience Carl commented that ldquoover the course of
this class I have progressed from knowing next to nothing about CALL
to knowing enough to feel con1047297dent about itrdquo Alissa explained
ldquoTechnology can be intimidating as I have found in the past but by
using this mode of communication in the class I was encouraged to
stay open minded when it came to the use of other technologiesrdquo
Besides concrete ideas about their own teaching students formed a
general philosophy of how CALL should or should not be used Alissa
felt that CMC wikis and SNS ldquoshould be part of the standard CALL
teaching in the classroomrdquo andthat ldquothesethree technologies offer the
opportunity for students to not only express themselves but
discovera style of learning that is new and excitingrdquo
Students also engaged in thoughtful critique of the place of
technology in language classrooms Anette mused that she ldquolearned
German just 1047297ne without the use of blogs chats the Internet wikis
CMCs and so onL2 learners [foreignsecond language learners] have
managed to learn language for centuries without the use of computersrdquo
She went on to articulate ldquothe real question is what are the bene1047297ts of
thecomputer in the classroom how can CALL add value to thelanguage
learning experiencerdquo Pavla pointed out some important practical
concerns such as obstacles to implementation ldquonot all regionshave the
access to computers and Internet Not all schools have big computer
labs and the 1047297nances to provide IT [instructional technology] to every
class I can say that IT and CALL are the luxuryrdquo Thus experientiallearning served not only to model the bene1047297ts of CALL use but it also
raised questions about the appropriateness of its use
44 Research question 4 instructor re 1047298ections on goals for use of Ning
site
We now turn back to the instructor and her re1047298ections on the
course She describes here again in her voice the technical
performance of the Ning site outcomes of the tasks its potential for
supporting interaction and overall effectiveness of the experiential
learning approach
441 Technical performance
Over the quarter the site was extremely reliable and I did notexperience any major technical dif 1047297culties (eg the server being
down) Registering and designing the site was easy The only problem
we encountered was that toward the end of the course the chat
feature was redesigned and we struggled to access it The new chat
feature was also problematic because longer messages were simply
cut off Dealing with these issues in class however gave students the
chance to see 1047297rst hand what logistical problems they might
encounter in their own CALL implementation I was able to model a
collaborative approach to solving the problem and turn it into a
teachable moment
One disadvantage of the Ning site was that it did not allow me to
set up the different tabs and content areas I would have liked (this has
since been changed and you can now customize the tabs and content
areas) For example there was no easy way to post 1047297les and based on
193N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 79
the suggestion of a student I resorted to creating a discussion forum
and attached 1047297les to a post (Ning now offers an application for 1047297le
sharing) In addition it would have been desirable if the Ning site
offered a wiki feature Instead I incorporated a wiki tool outside of
Ning which was not heavily used Students may have used the wiki
more for their group projects if it had been integrated in the Ning site
Commercial course management systems like Blackboard do offer
these features but my goal was to introduce students to a free
alternative to course management systems Such alternatives oftenrequire some creativity and compromise
442 Tasks
Ning effectively supported the tasks I wishedstudentsto complete
The main page allowed me to feature several text boxes with
organizational information (eg homework group assignments)
Online discussions were effective for in-class as well as homework
assignments Students were able to post drafts of their work in forums
to receive peer feedback In addition these forums were used to
discuss the reading assignments The blog was for required student
re1047298ections on their experiences and attitudes using prompts provided
by me While students could easily read each others blogs I did not
design any activities speci1047297cally asking them to read these entries
Unlike the blogs and discussion forums synchronous communication
was used exclusively during class (at least as initiated by me) for
activities that lend themselves to the fast-paced nature of the
interaction Brainstorming for example seemed appropriate because
chat allows for less re1047298ection and requires shorter turns Towards the
end of the term I was unable to make it to class because I was
traveling to a conference Students met face-to-faceand we all logged
on to the Ning chat to discuss some upcoming assignments This was a
very valuable experience for the students because they noticed how
dif 1047297cult it is to communicate with somebody exclusively through this
modality The task selection for the chat was also in1047298uenced by the
fact that Ning does not archive chat transcripts which didnt allow me
to read the interactions unless I as the instructor was logged at the
same time as the students Interestingly some students decided to
integrate the chat feature into their 1047297nal presentations
443 Interaction
I was surprised to hear that the latest activity updates (displayed
on the main page) served as teasers encouraging some students to
read their classmates posts I have to admit that initially this feature
of the homepage didnt seem to serve any real purpose and I even
considered deleting it Since Ning allows customization of the
homepage layout I will be sure to 1047297nd a prominent place for this
feature the next time I teach the class
I was encouraged to learn through the analysis of this data that
students did read each others blogs without it being a requirement or
part of the grade In my view educational technology is most effective
when students make it their ownand initiate some useby themselves
In the future I will consider adding an interactive component to the
blog assignment to increase students exposure to their classmatesperspectives and to more overtly support community building
444 Experiential learning
Overall Ning supported experiential learning in ways consistent
with my goals Based on their own experiences students noticed
important issues that are essential to consider when designing CMC
tasks First and foremost instructors have to be prepared for the
technology not to work and be able to useproblem-solving skills such
as when the chat tool was redesigned The students experienced 1047297rst
hand the affordances and constraints of chat and discussion forums
The time lag of asynchronous CMC tools allows for the careful
composition of posts a feature that makes them a good 1047297t for tasks
targeting higher cognitive skills (Arnold amp Ducate 2006) such as the
lesson plan peer review mentioned by Karen Thefast-paced nature of
synchronous CMC on the other hand can make it a challenge to
follow an online conversation This issue was brought up in class by
one of the students after we had just completed a chat activity
Tsukiko a non-native speaker of English admitted that the demands
of simply following the exchanges among the 10 students in our class
prevented her from fully participating This emphasizes how
important it is to carefully consider group size when using chat
with language learners
5 Discussion
Experiential learning activities can model for students how
technologies such as Ning can be used in their own teaching These
learning activities helped the participants in our study to identify the
limitations and possibilities of using technology tools in their own
teaching and the tradeoffs this entails However the tools were not
always used in the way that the instructor had intended For example
students did not make much use of the outside wiki or their Ning
group pages which in retrospect is not particularly surprising Since
students came to campus on a regular basis (which is not the case for
fully online classes) they were able to meet in person to work on this
assignment Students often prefer face-to-face meetings for group
projects especially when major decisions are involved (ArnoldDucate Lomicka amp Lord 2009)
People often appropriate technology reinventing it for their own
uses mdash uses which may differ from the designers intentions
Technologies are equivocal able to be ldquointerpreted in multiple and
perhaps con1047298icting waysrdquo (Fulk 1993 p 922) Students may not use
technologies in the way they are envisioned by the instructor instead
ldquorecreatingrdquo the tool to meet their needs (Walther 1999 Paulus
2007) In this study providing a mechanism for students to view
models read each others work provide feedback engage in
conversation and build a sense of community was not the intended
purpose for the Ning site yet students appropriated it for these uses
Much of this student interaction could easily have been missed
because it was vicarious and constitutes a form of lurking that is
reading but not responding to posted information or discussions
among other students Previous studies have explored this phenom-
enon of vicarious interaction and the role of lurkers in online
environments (Dennen 2008) Lurkers are often viewed as not
engaging in what many consider essential learning behaviors namely
dialogue and interaction
What we do not see in asynchronous environments literally and
1047297guratively is what else [besides visible online activity] is going
on that contributes to participants learning And it is easy to
assume that unless learners in online formats are actively
participating by posting frequent and relevant contributions they
may be bene1047297ting relatively little from this more passive
experience (Beaudoin 2002 p 147ndash148)
In our study much of the student interaction was invisible to theinstructor but it was anything but passive Instead the invisible
interactions supported community building and provided opportuni-
ties for modeling both of which promote learning We argue
therefore that thiskind of invisible interaction falls under the category
of pedagogical lurking ldquotemporary situational or topical lurking in a
class contextrdquo (Dennen 2008 p1631) As Dennen (2008) pointed out
pedagogical lurking is a vital component of online learning environ-
ments which rely on the reading of posts to facilitate interactive
learning Nonneckeand Preece (2003) made a similar argument when
suggesting the term ldquonon-public participationrdquo be used instead of
lurking because ldquoit is notpejorative andsuggeststhereare other forms
of valid participation other than public postingrdquo (p 130)
Rovai (2000) suggested that lurking can undermine community
building which was not the case in this blended course The vicarious
194 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 89
participation of these students was not a sign of disengagement
(unlike free riding) On the contrary it was integral to the sense of
community expressed by the students a phenomenon that has also
been observed in discussion lists (Nonnecke amp Preece 2003)
Interestingly CMC tools are often used to foster a sense of community
among learners In our case community building was not an explicit
goal for this course yet students felt that the use of the Ning site
fostered their ability to do so Even though the overt community
building features (ldquofriendingrdquo and wall posting) in Ning were not
highly used the individual pro1047297les added a personal touch to the
posts Our participants perceived the Ning site to function differently
than proprietary course management systems as re1047298ected in Garys
evaluation that Ning was a ldquofresh alternativerdquo This might be due to
Ning s emphasis on individual pro1047297les within a group context and the
communication among members of the community In contrast
course management systems put the instructor at the center of the
experience with total control of the environment Students may
perceive the former to facilitate communication and collaboration
while the latter are primarily designed for a one-way information
transfer controlled by the instructor This focus on transmission of
knowledge is evident even in the name of one course management
system BlackboardMore visible interactions among students may have been
unintentionally hindered by the structure and authenticity of the
tasks in the class While highly structuring tasks in online environ-
ments is increasingly seen as a ldquobest practicerdquo they can also reduce
spontaneous communication that could take place in these environ-
ments (Scherff amp Paulus 2006) Including less structured tasks may
encourage more conversation community building and collaborative
re1047298ection
Authentic and meaningful tasks are important in all learning
contexts especially language learning Using chat with students who
are in the same classroom is somewhat arti1047297cial There are however
sound reasons to use this strategy especially for foreign language
instruction For example some reticent students participate more
actively in synchronous chat than in face-to-face classroom discus-sions (Beauvois 1998) The value of using chat with learners who are
in the same room has been debated among CALL researchers and
practitioners for some time Sharing this debate with students and
talking explicitly about task authenticity may improve the outcome of
this teaching strategy
6 Conclusion
As suggested by tenets of re1047298ective practice (Schoumln 1983)
combining the students and both our perspectives (that of the
instructor and that of an outsider) proved especially valuable for
exploring the learning opportunities created through the Ning site
This approach provided ldquoa multifaceted stereoscopic view [] of
the intended and unintended outcomes of classroom eventsrdquo
(Kumaravadivelu 2003 p 290) Table 4 summarizes the intended
as well as unintended uses of the Ning site
Our research was designed as a case study to gain a holistic
understanding of how Ning was used in this particular class A
limitation of the study is the small number of participants and we
acknowledge that our 1047297ndings are context speci1047297c We leave it to the
reader to identify how our 1047297ndings may transfer into similar contexts
(Lincoln amp Guba 1985) Our 1047297ndings do however have implications
for the instructional design of blended learning environments
Students will likely appropriate the online tools and space to meet
their needs mdash and how they do so may surprise us as educators
Vicarious interaction and pedagogical lurking may be occurring even
though we cant see it so instructors should talk with students about
how they are using the online space For a small class with frequent
face-to-face meetings a SNS while not the primary tool for
community building may extend the community originally formed
in the physical classroom into an online space The online ldquohubrdquo
provides students the chance to publicly post and read each others
work modeling approaches to the assignments and opportunities to
provide feedback Pro1047297le pages allow posts and completed work to be
connected to a person not just a name adding to a sense of
community Tasks should be authentic and unstructured enough topromote visible interaction if that is a desired outcome of the course
Our 1047297ndings have implications for future research as well The
vicarious interaction that occurred calls into question our reliance on
visible online behaviors as evidence of for what happens in online
environments Techniques such as content analysis can provide
insight into only part of a whole Future research may want to
incorporate data collection procedures such as think-aloud protocols
interviews real-time observations or even key strokelogging and eye
movement tracking to get a more complete picture of online learning
behaviors We propose several questions for further study It is still
unclear how online and face-to-face community building and
maintenance differ in blended courses Rovai and Jordan (2004)
speculated that the blended format might accommodate the needs of
a wider variety of learners thus contributing to the stronger sense of community found in a blended courseover a fully onlineor residential
one What happens when a group of learners has two venues for
community building available (online and face-to-face) Does this
create two separate communities or do they overlap Which tools do
they choose to use and for which aspects of the community building
Furthermore research should explore the role of the instructor in
community building in hybridblended courses Brown (2001)
reported that in onlinecourses the instructorsrole is quite important
In blended courses do students prefer a separate community online
without involvement of the teacher Finally could less structured
tasks promote more visible interaction among participants While
pedagogical lurking has bene1047297ts how much lurking is too much A
better understanding of these processes will allow educators to better
match their instructional goals with appropriate tools and tasks
Table 4
SNS features and intendedunintended uses
Feature Intended goal for use Goal met Unintended uses
Text boxes Repository of course information Yes None found
Discussion forums Re1047298ection through completing tasks
peer feedback
Yes Modeling peer f eedback pedagog ical lurking
Chat Brainstorming informationopinion exchange
more equal participation
Yes but students
criticized lack of
authenticity
Incorporated by students into their 1047297nal presentations
Instructor joined class remotely during
conference travel
Blog Re1047298ection through journaling Yes Modeling community building pedagogical lurkingGroup sites Facilitate collaboration among
students for their group project
No St udent s directed gr oup member s t o t he wiki site
Individual pro1047297le pages and friending No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Community building
Activity updates No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Modeling community building
Wall posts No de1047297ned instructor goal NA Sharing information
195N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196
8102019 Using a Social Networking Site for Experiential Learning
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullusing-a-social-networking-site-for-experiential-learning 99
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants of this study for allowing
us to use their data and sharing their experiences with us We are also
grateful for the reviewers valuable comments
References
Abrams Z I (2006) From theory to practice Intracultural CMC in the L2 classroom In
L Ducate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 181minus210) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Arnold N amp Ducate L (2006) Future foreign language teachers social and cognitivecollaboration in an online environmentLanguage Learning amp Technology 10(1)42minus66 Retrieved from httplltmsueduvol10num1pdfarnoldducatepdf
Arnold N Ducate L Lomicka L amp Lord G (2009) Assessing online collaborationamong language teachers A cross-institutional case study Journal of InteractiveOnline Learning 8(2) 121minus139 Retrieved from httpwwwncolrorgjiolissues get1047297lecfmvolID=8ampIssueID=26ampArticleID=132
Beaudoin M F (2002) Learning or lurking Tracking the ldquoinvisiblerdquo online studentInternet and Higher Education 5 147minus155
Beauvois M H (1998) Conversations in slow motion Computer-mediated commu-nication in the foreign language classroom The Canadian Modern Language Review54(2) 198minus217
Blattner G amp Fiori M (2009) Facebookin thelanguageclassroomInternational Journalof Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 6 (1) Retrieved from httpwwwitdlorgjournaljan_09article02htm
Bogdan R C amp Biklen S K (2007) Qualitative research for education An introduction to
theories and methods 5th ed Boston Allyn amp BaconBrown R E (2001) The process of community building in distance learning classes
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 5(2) 18minus35 Retrieved from http sloan-corgpublicationsjalnv5n2pdfv5n2_brownpdf
Compton L K L (2009) Preparing language teachers to teach language online A lookat skills roles and responsibilities Computer Assisted Language Learning 2273minus99
Dennen V P (2008) Pedagogical lurking Student engagement in non-postingdiscussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior 24 1624minus1633
Egbert J (2006) Learning in context Situating language teacher learning in CALL In PHubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL (pp 167minus182) AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Fulk J (1993) Social construction of communication technology Academy of Management Journal 36 921minus950
Garrison D Anderson T amp Archer W (2000) Critical inquiry in a text-basedenvironment Computer conferencing in higher education The Internet and Higher Education 2(2ndash3) 87minus105
Halvorsen A (2009) Social networking sites and critical language learning In M
Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20 and second language learning (pp 237minus258) Hershey PA Information Science ReferenceHorrigan J B (2007) A typology of information and communication technology users
Retrieved from httppewInternetorg~mediaFilesReports2007PIP_ICT_Typologypdfpdf
Hubbard P (2008) CALL and the future of language teacher education CALICO Journal 25(2) 175minus188
Hubbard P amp Levy M (Eds) (2006) Teacher education in CALL AmsterdamNetherlands John Benjamins
Kessler G (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training What are we doing and what couldwe do better In P Hubbard amp M Levy (Eds) Teacher education in CALL(pp 23minus42) Amsterdam Netherlands John Benjamins
Kolb D A (1984) Experiential learning New Jersey Prentice HallKolb D A Boyatzis R E amp Mainemelis C (2001) Experiential learning theory
Previous research and new directions In R J Sternberg amp L -F Zhang (Eds) New perspectives on thinking learning and cognitive styles (pp 227minus248) Mahwah NJLawrence Erlbaum
Kumaravadivelu B (2003) Beyond methods Macrostrategies for language teaching NewHaven CT Yale University Press
Lincoln Y S amp Guba E G (1985) Naturalistic inquiry Beverly Hills CA SagePublications
Lomicka L (2006) Understanding the other Intercultural exchange and CMC In LDucate amp N Arnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to newdirections in foreign language teaching (pp 211minus236) San Marcos TX CALICOPress
Luke C (2006) Situation CALL in the broader methodological context of foreignlanguage teaching and learning Promises and possibilities In L Ducate amp NArnold (Eds) Calling on CALL From theory and research to new directions in foreign
language teaching (pp 21minus
42) San Marcos TX CALICO PressMcBride K (2009) Social-networking sites in foreign language classes Opportunitiesforre-creation InL Lomicka amp G Lord (Eds)The nextgeneration Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp 35minus58) SanMarco TexasCALICO Press
Merriam S B (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education Reved San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
Mitchell K (2009) ESOL students on Facebook Portland Oregon Portland StateUniversity Masters thesis
Nonnecke B amp Preece J (2003) Silent participants Getting to know lurkers better InCLeugamp DFisher (Eds) FromUsenet to CoWebs Interacting withsocial informationspaces (pp 110minus132) London Springer-Verlag
Oblinger D amp Oblinger J (2005) Is it age or IT First steps towards understanding theNet Generation In D G Oblinger amp J L Oblinger (Eds) Educating the Net Generation Retrieved from httpwwweducauseedueducatingthenetgen
Paulus T M (2007) CMC modes for learning tasks at a distance Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 1322minus1345
Pew Internet and American Life Project (nd) What kind of tech user are youRetrieved from httppewinternetorgParticipateWhat-Kind-of-Tech-User-Are-
YouaspxRovai A P (2000) Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning
networks The Internet and Higher Education 3 285minus297Rovai A P (2003) In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online
programs The Internet and Higher Education 6 (1) 1minus16Rovai A P amp Jordan H M (2004) Blended learning and sense of community A
comparative analysis with traditional and fully online courses International Reviewof Research in Open and Distance Learning 5(2) Retrieved from httpwwwirrodlorgindexphpirrodlarticleview192274
Scherff L amp Paulus T (2006) Encouraging ownership of online spaces Support forpreservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication Contem-
porary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 6 (4) 354minus373Schoumln D (1983) The re 1047298ective practitioner How professionals think in action London
Temple SmithSchwartz H (2009 September 28) Facebook The new classroom commons The
Chronicle of Higher Education 56 (7)Stevenson M P amp Liu M (2010) Learning a language with web 20 Exploring the use
of social networking features of foreign language learning websites CALICO Journal 27 (2) 233minus259
Strauss A amp Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2nd ed Thousand Oaks CA Sage
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) (2009) Technologystandards for language teachers Retrieved July 15 2009 from httpwwwtesolorgs_tesolsec_documentaspCID=1972ampDID=12052
Terris B (2009 October 13) At oneEnglishcollege Facebook serves as a retention toolChronicle of Higher Education Retrieved from httpchroniclecomblogPostAt-One-English-College-Fac8435
Walther J B (1999May) Visual cuesand computer-mediated communication Dont lookbefore you leap San Francisco CA Annual meeting of the InternationalCommunication Association
Warschauer M (2009) Foreword In M Thomas (Ed) Handbook of research on web 20and second language learning (pp xix-xx) Hershey PA Information ScienceReference
196 N Arnold T Paulus Internet and Higher Education 13 (2010) 188ndash196