18
NOAM CHOMSKY’S UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR Modern tendencies in linguistics

Univerzalna Gramatika

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 1/18

NOAM CHOMSKY’S UNIVERSAL

GRAMMAR

Modern tendencies in linguistics

Page 2: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 2/18

WHAT IS UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR?

Universal grammar is the system of  principles, conditions and rules that are

elements or properties of all human

languages. 

(Chomsky, 1976:29)

Page 3: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 3/18

LANGUAGE ACQUISITION DEVICE

The early Universal Grammar Model

Input ----- LAD ----- Output(language data) (grammar of a

language)

 According to Chomsky, LAD is the

neurological system in the brain that

facilitates language development

Page 4: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 4/18

INNATENESS HYPOTHESIS

Chomsky claims that the process of languageacquisition is genetically predetermined byinnate language faculty.

The only thing child requires is the exposure tolanguage so it could master it.

Orphans from Africa

Critical period

Wild children

Page 5: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 5/18

CHOMSKY  VS SKINNER

Nativist: * grammar is innate

* needs little data

Behaviorist: * grammar is learnable

* needs robust data

Language could have gradually evolved by natural selection. Pinker, 1995 

Page 6: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 6/18

THE POVERTY OF STIMULUS ARGUMENT

How do we learn so much on the basis of solittle evidence?

Not enough information for the rich complexlanguage that children acquire at such ayoung age

Children are never really taught a languageyet they recognize the ungrammaticalsentences

Page 7: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 7/18

Children learn through:

Positive evidence (the natural input that child

receives)

Negative evidence: - direct (explicit

corrections)

- indirect

(ungrammatical input)

Pidgin and Creole languages

Page 8: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 8/18

LANGUAGE UNIVERSALS

 All human natural languages share the same

basic materials for building their grammar 

 All languages have:

verbs, nouns, pronouns… 

grammatical structures to make a question grammatical structures to distinct present,

past and future… 

Page 9: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 9/18

PARAMETERS SETTINGS

When child gets input he sets his parameters

according to the situation

(a) Mario parla italiano. (b) Parla italiano.

(c) Mario speaks Italian. (d) Speaks Italian.*

Italian is a null-subejct  language whileEnglish is not.

Page 10: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 10/18

Parameters are binary in nature

That explains why children learn so fast and

error-free

In conclusion that children in the acquisition

of grammar have the twin task of lexical

learning and parameters settings.

Page 11: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 11/18

TRANSFORMATION RULES

Transformation rules connect deep structure

and surface structure

Sentences may be presented in the brain at

two levels:

One can be heard or seen – surface

structure

One cannot be heard or seen – deep

structure

Page 12: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 12/18

Transformation rules will change or move

constituents in the structures derive from the

phrase structure rules.

S

NP VP

Pron V NP

Det N

You close the door 

Page 13: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 13/18

D-structure

S-structure

LF PF

Relation between cognitive system and language

Transformationa

l rules

Logical formPhonetic

form

Page 14: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 14/18

DEEP STRUCTURE

Deep structure refers to the underlying meaning of a sentence as it is represented inthe brain. (Chomsky, 1957.)

The boy kicked the ball.

The ball was kicked by the boy.

 Ambiguous sentences:

I have seen driving man.

• I have seen a man driving.

• I have seen a man who normally drives.

Page 15: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 15/18

THE GOVERNMENT AND BINDING THEORY 

In G/B theory UG is broken into two maincomponents: level of representation and asystem of constraints

Lexicon

D-structure

S-structure

PF LF

Page 16: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 16/18

syntax

phonetic form (PF) logical form (LF)

PF and LF constitute the interface between

language and other cognitive systems

(Chomsky, 1986.)

Syntax functions as a “bridge” between soundsand meanings (Cook, 1988.)

Page 17: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 17/18

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

M. Nenadović 

Page 18: Univerzalna Gramatika

7/27/2019 Univerzalna Gramatika

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/univerzalna-gramatika 18/18

LITERATURE:

P. Matthews, A short history of structural 

linguistics, Cambridge 2003

N. Chomsky, Reflections on language,

London 1976 

 A. Radford, Minimalist syntax, Cambridge

2006 

N. Čomski, Gramatika i um, Beograd, 1972 

V. Cook, The poverty of stimulus argument,

Thessaloniki, 1990