49

Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)
Page 2: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

TABA

Page 3: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

D AT A y

TH C I f OF IT rF

MAR 2 1 2014

The Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon Chainnan Committee of Armed Services United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

Thank you for your letter dated February 14, 2014 requesting that th Army provide you with a list of the Army's unfunded priorities for FY 2015.

I would firat to expr my appreciation for the support of the Congress In passing the FY 2014 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P .L. 113-76). The Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2013 provided the Army some relief from the Budget Control Act (BCA) defense spending caps and predictability in FY 2014 and FY 2015. While the restoration of some funding In FY 2014 helps the Army restore some of the readiness lost in FY 2013, it is not sufficient to fully eliminate the void in core capabilities created over the past decad of coun1erinaurgency operations. The current level of FY 2015 funding will allow the Army to sustain lle readinea levels achieved in FY 2014, but will only generate the minimum readil"t8A required to meet the DefenM Strategy. The anticipated sequestration reductions in FY 2018 and beyond hinder our ability to shape the Army for the future. Projected budget reductions will MVerely degrad Army reldineaa and mod mization efforts even as we continue to draw down and restructure the Army into a smaller force.

Affordablltty is driving the need to reduce Total Army end strength and force structure. To optimize readiness for the Nation under smaller budgets, we made dtfflcult decisions that impacted modernization program . such aa halting the development of the Ground Combat Vehicle. The Army is in the process of an accelerated drawdown to 490,000 in the active oomponent; 350,200 in the Army National Guard (ARNG); and 202,000 in the U.S Army Reeerve (USAR) by the end of FY 2015 (accelelllted from what was previously planned for FY 2017). In conjunction with these end trength reduction . the Army ia lnnovdvely reorganizing the current operational force and eliminating excess hNdquartera tnfraatructure in order to provide greater combat power across the remaining brigade combat teama (BCTs). The Army will also restructure our aviation formations to achieve a leaner, more efficient and capable force that balances operational capability and flexibility across the Total Army. The Army Is enhancing its ability to Prevent and Shape by regionally aligning Army forces with Combatant Commanders and responding to their requirements for partnership building exercisea around the world.

Page 4: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

- 2 -

The combined effects of sustained operational demand for Army forces and budget reductio~& have resul~ in a decline in unit readiness across the Total Army. The post­war enVIronment requ1res land forces that are trained and equipped for full spectrum, combined arms maneuver capabilities. This is a shift in focus away from Counterinsurgency (COIN) forces. In order to build decisive action capabilities in FY 2015, the Army has prioritized funds to property train forces in the Army Contingency Force and, due to top line funding decreaaea, hat accepted riak to the readineaa of multifunctional and theater support brigades aa well as In progressive heme station training, facilities, equipment sustainment and modernization.

Enclosure 11dentifies known gaps in training, installation readiness, nd modernization throughout the Total Army. The enclosed $10.6 billion of unfunded requirements includes the Army's $7.5 billion portion of the Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative (OGSI). Funding the items identified on the list would provide training opportunities at all operational levels, including multifunctional and theater support brigades to meet Combatant Commander demands. Additional fund for trak\ing would improve ARNG and USAR readiness to the level of Platoon(+) proficiency above the Individual, Crew, and Squad proficiency funded In the FY 2015 President's Budget requeat. Additionally, two ARNG BCTa would be able to participate in Combat Training Center (CTC) rotations.

The Army had to make dlfftcult decisions and tradeoff& to prioritize buikilng of naar term readiness needed to support the Defense Strategy under a conatratned budget top line. The President's FV15 Budget request reftec::ta the decision to conclude the Ground Combat Vehlde program after the technology pha , as the program · no longer affordable under current budget constraints. Becau an Infantry Fighting Vehida (IFV) remains a priority, In the interim the Army will continue funding technology m.Wration etforta and defer development of the IFV until additional re ources become available. ModerniZation programs in the attached list add capabilities and cost av ngs through multi-year procurement of dditional UH-60 Blackhawk, AH-64 Apache nd CH-47 Chinook aircraft in support of the Aviation Restructure Initiative. The Army would also accelerate the development and procurement of a 4th Double V-hull set for a Stryker Brigade Combat Team. Additional funding would increase Air and M. Defense support to Comba nt Commanders. Additional command and control capability supports the Soldier as the centerpiece to landpower by further enhancing situational awareneaa and connectivity from the tactical edge.

To address risk In our Installation Infrastructure, the unfunded requirements list significantly improves installation readine11 that has been degraded under the cumulative impacts of unoertain and reduced funding. Sustainment and base operation support ktvela would increase to 90% of requirements acroas the Total Army providing much needed stability to support base aervioea and infrastructure. The mHitary con truction request accelerates key readiness and training projects to meet Army pnoritiea for readiness and taldng care of our most important asset, Soldiers and their Families.

Page 5: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

- 3 ~

The Army is in the midst of a very critical time of downsizing and adapting to a post­war environment while, at the same time, remaining very much engaged in contingencies around the world, including combat, training, and support operations in Afghanistan. lam very concerned about the impact to Army base funds in FY 2015 if the Overseas Contingency Operationa (OCO) budget request is not acted upon by the start of the fiscal year. Absent approval for OCO funding, we would be required to support OCO·funded mi&aions with base funds. which would immediately begin degrading readinasa acroaa the Total Army. The instability in base funding is detrimental to the long term sustained readiness necel88ry to meet the Increasingly complex threat environment and the Army's roles In the Defense Strategy.

My goal is to preclude hollowness in our force by achieving balance between readiness, end strength, and modemllation. This goal wm be extremely difficutt to achieve in an environment of rapid declining budgets and uncertainty in OCO funding. Aa we look to the future, Army bate funding muat be adjuated to account for enduring requirements neceaaary to support the Defense Strategy. Even in a am ller Army, I estimate our enduring base requirement will increase to include requirements such as depot maintenance after Reaet is completed and enduring operations currenUy funded In OCO (e.g. Operation Spartan Shield). Planning for the future demands that risk in modernization be overcome through support In base funding. The Anny require& the resource& to balance risk between end strength, readiness, and modernization.

I am providing copies of this letter to the chairs and ranking members of the Congrnaional Defense oommitteel as well as the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chlefl of Stllff.

I thank you for your enduring and committed support for our Soldiers and their Families ensuring our Nation'• defense at home and around the world. I appreciate your consideration of the Army's resource challenges and look forward to working with you to addrel& the ever ..evolving national security environment.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

Raymond T. Odierno General, United States Arm~·

Page 6: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Enctoeure: F!Kal Year 2015 Unfunded Requirement. U.t

Key Area Title Amount Oel<lription CSMl 1-RC Jlfr/and~ 1D dlnd

..... I)'Pef'sonnel Reeerve Componenr Tl'llnlng Support 305 ~ T~. AANG Pre CTC ltld ~~- a.,_, Trelnlng & Llldef

RMIDrw rlak In AC Glound and All OPTEMPO, 1ncreM1 ARHG ~

OPTeMPO 1,000 11om L'CIS ID ~ 8fiCI PlaiDon !AWl: 8uppom ARNG CTC ratdons: I~ USAR ~flam 1/CISID PIMoon~

Plovlde5 ~ TSS Funclng for

~reining & Trelnklg 5uppor1 230 l..., Dwalapmllt and lndMdull Trllinlng, Mcla lnaltullleriallon .. the CTCA far IN ani m.neuv. bett.t1on1

reeourcee tupport au COMPO&.

Tnlnlftg RNciiMM FUnding 111111Dret Alfrrt'l QIIPIIblllr 1o eupport the ~and~ lor ODfiWI'IIIIIcllllon and eledronlol ~ ~ aUIIMia net oen1r1e ~. m11t1111n ~ aoftwllre~Y*N (PPI8) to -..,on aiiiiMOtk Willie Amrt 2414,

Depol MaiiMnanoe tue IUpport moclenllulionl lfiOr1l In IVIatlofl a!ICIINIIIIII (UH-eO ana bMIIIIIIIII, m.t1a1n CIIPl6e- of ,.W (depots) IAWlllltt10 U.S C 2414. N1P0rt modemlr.alone doria "' ftllltion and miaiiM (UH-80 Mel PATRI01), eupporta oombat IINica auppcwt. OOIIIbet & lldk:al wNc:lal and llclrMiefld ncurily l'lliMionl

a. .. ap.ratlon Support 1.514 RMD'M baM .uppolt and..........,., teadlnMIID 10% ol requirWnlnt

Facllty Sultlllnmanl, Raatoretlon and 1,380 lrllprowld .... IUitairlmallt lo "*' the

Moclernlutlon OIDI0%110111

Provi0-.IIIIIP0'11D /INrfl F~ Holllint Army Famty Houling 106 apiiiiiOII. llllllrltlnMDt ltld raper. 1aa111111

ltld RCI 6UIIP(K1

~ ARCYIII!R and llllwCQ dlfllnw ion Alfrrt lnllalldonl, PI'!Mdel Felly

Operalona Suppoft ActNIIIM 850 1Upport ...._ u.t dl-.oly IUppo!t lnCNUI r.adftallllaWng req'*-<1 tor the

lnslallatlon R8eclln ... AC. ARNO and RelaNw: ~ EnwlroiWNnlal Rellolation ......

Million Com••llnd 45 lluppolb IT I'IWIIon 1111 far UIAAEUR, UaMPAC. IlliG IN8COM

~-- 10 MILCON proJecCa for ltlt ~. Hatlonlll GUild. Mel Raaarve Colilpcll .. to addrlellalllld 01 MlllnO

MIL CON 000 ......... •rtoua lwllly deloiiiiCIIe 1mpac11ng unit....,_, n ng IIIQIIcillrqo. lllrrrJ command anc1 oonlrol QIPiblllaa, Arrrtt lnduU'ill baM produclian and 8oldllr quality of life

~ de<Mioplnaut of lhe MDciiW Handgun, ar.n.csa Launoher sillh4inll

Soldier 81 ayaa.m Mel the Compact~

Moclemizatlon 8nlpar Syatem. UIJD'IIda UD M2 Mechina DUM~ al COMPOS

Procures 110 Olllclad t.CLRS Roeklltl:

"'" ....... DeWiu 107 I~=.':!'::!:!""' to r.c~uca

.... 1oi Z

Page 7: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Encloeuna: Fiacal v .. r 2015 Unfunded Requlrementa Ust

Aviation

·~

Mllelon Command

Page 8: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350 · 1 000

The llonorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon Chairman, Committee on

Armed Services House of Representatives Washington, JJC 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

March 3 I, 20 14

Thank you for your letter of February 14, 20 14 requesting an unfunded priority list for the Navy. I am also providing this letter to the congressional defense committees pursuant to the requirements in section 1003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (P. L. 112-239).

The enclosure provides Navy' s FY 2015 unfunded priority items to fullill a validated requirement or combatant commander priority should funds above those already requested in the FY 201 5 President's Budget (PB-15) become available. This list also includes readiness items that were degraded due t~ rv 2013 sequestration and reduced FY 201 4 funding, t<>r which additional FY 2015 funding will accelerate improvements that are proposed more gradually in PH-15.

My li st includes items in the following areas:

• Maintenance- Increases activity at depot maintenance facilities to accelerate recovery fhm1 sequestration, improve operational availability of fl eet aircraft, and enable Navy to meet the mandated capital in cstment of 6% across all shipyards and depots.

• Afloat Readiness - Provides impro ed operational flexibility and support to OPLAN and presence requirements.

• Critical Spares - Improves availability of critical aviation spares to ensure aircra11 arc delivered' ith the proper level of logistics support.

• Shore Readiness - Particularly degraded hy sequestration, arrests and improves deteriorating faciliti es and adds resources lor sustainment, restoration and modernization of installations.

• Modernization - Accelerates critical capabilities of key weapons systems to the Fleet in order to ensure the United Stales maintains technological superiority over potential ad ersaries; includes aviation assets (e.g., P-8A, E-2D, EA-180 ).

• Manpower/Training - Increases training support to meet prescribed readiness levels, improves manpower management systems, and addresses shortfalls for recruitment.

Page 9: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

While the im cstment presented here arc important , they are not of a higher priority than items in our PR- I 5 budget submission. Consequently, I request funding of items on this list not come at the expense of the FY 2015 budget request.

I ha e not included spcci ric funding in FY 2015 for the USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN 73rs refueling overhaul. This unfunded transcends FY 2015 - it L a Future Year Defense Program (FYDP) requirement. Retaining this aircrafl carrier would require $7 billion across our FYDP. Thus the decision to refuel or. inactivate CVN 73 is dependent upon the fiscal outlook in 1-Y 2016 and beyond, and whether we will be forced to return to sequestration levels.

A similar letter has been sent to Ranking Member Smith, as well as Chairwoman Mikulski; Chairmen I .evin, Rogers, Durbin and l·relinghuysen; and Ranking Members lnhofe, Lowey, Shelby, Cochran and Visclosky. I rt can be of further assistance, please let me know.

Sincerely.

~~:= a Admiral, U.S. Navy

Enclosure: Navy 's Fiscal Year 2015 Unfunded Priority List

2

Page 10: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Navy's FY 2015 Unfunded Priority List

Maintenance The maintenance items listed below increase activity at depot maintenance facilities to accelerate recovery from sequestration, improve operational availability of fleet aircratl, and enable Navy to meet the mandated capital investment of 6% across all shipyards and depots. The funding wi II allow for optimization of the aviation repair workload within the capacity of the repair depots. Achie ing this balance will result in a reduction to the FY 15 engine and airframe backlog, ultimately supporting higher aircraft Mission Capable and Full Mission Capable rates. Funding also supports organizational level maintenance, enhancing tactical repair of aircraft.

Maintenance

Fund FHP 0 -Level Maintenance(1A1A/1A2A)

Fund Add.itional Aviation Depot Maintenance

Fund Shipyard Recap to NDAA levels

Additional SCN Outfitting Funding

Afloat Readiness

FY15 ($M)

$ 68 $ 136

$ 104 $ 14

The anoat readiness items listed below provide improved operational flexibility and support to OPLAN and presence requirements. Restoration of Combat Logistics Force platfonns and operational steaming days will ensure longer endurance of deployed forces better material support for underway repair, and enhanced self-sustainability. JHSV manpower and steaming days are also included to provide an additional platfonn to meet COCOM and emergent operational requirements.

Afloat Readiness

Fund T-AKE's to Full Operational Status

Joint High Speed Vessel Operations

Fund CLF steaming days

Aviation Logistics (1A9A)

Critical Spares

FY15($M)

$ 72

$ 10

$ 13 $ 148

The critical spares listed below improve availability of outfitting spares to ensure aircraft are delivered with the proper level of logistics support and reduce risk in our aviation spares accounts. Ultimately, this will lead to higher Full Mission Capable rates, enhanced safety of personnel , and more flexibility during training, simulation, and deployed operations.

Critical Spares

Fund Additional Spares (APN-6)

Shore Readiness

FY15($M)

$ 178

Navy took significant risk in shore readiness during sequestration in order to support deployed operations and afloat readiness. The items below arrest and improve deteriorating facilities, and restore ashore programs and requirements that were particularly degraded by sequestration. The military construction projects will enhance fleet support and conduct critical repair of selected

Page 11: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

shore facilities. Family housing projects will ensure family suppo11, improving quality of life for Navy personnel. Long-delayed demolition and previously-approved but not executed BRAC actions are also requested.

Shore Readiness FV15 ($M)

Berthing Barge Improvements $ 5

Reserve Remote Computer Access Solution $ 10

Base Operating Support Enhancements $ 41

Fund Unaccompanied Barracks $ 75

NCIS Polygraphic Support $ 4

BRAC Funding (previous rounds) $ 40

Fund Facilities Demolition from FV13/14 $ 106

MILCON Additions $ 519

Facilities Sustainment for Major Projects s 215

Family Housing Construction $ 77

Accelerate Facilities Demolition Program s 265

Accelerate critical MILCON Projects into FV15 s 589

NAVFAC Environmental Support $ 4

Environmental Restoration Actions s 101

Buyback FY13 sequestration cuts to Facilities Recapitalization $ 461

Flagship Institution Recapitalization Reductions $ 44

Fund Facilities Sustainment to 90% of Model $ 216

Planning efforts for oil spill/natural resources $ 6

Improve Facilities Conditions with OMN RM investment $ 801

Fund Facilities Sustainment to 100% of Model $ 265

Modernization Modernization is critical in order to maintain superiority over existing and emerging threats. The difficult decisions necessary under PB-15 funding levels necessitated delaying validated modernization requirements. The items below will accelerate critical capabilities to the fleet , remediate cyber issues and reduce risk in Navy's ability to support the DSG. Modernization spans a multitude of procurement categories to include ships aircraft, and weapons.

The 22 additional EA-18Gs would enJ1ance Navy's ability to support the Joint Tactical Airborne Electronic Attack (AEA) capability. Ongoing analysis by DoD and the DoN indicate a larger squadron size is needed to maximize the AEA capabilities and reduce risk in a Joint major contingency operation. An additional 22 EA-18Gs would allow the carrier air wing electronic attack squadron to increase from five to seven aircraft per squadron, reducing the wartighting risk in the Joint Force 's ability to operate in future complex electromagnetic anti-access/area­denial environments. Additional details can be provided in a classified forum.

Page 12: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Modernization FY15 ($M)

P-SA Rephase APN -1 to 16/9/13/11/7 $ 1,125

Aegis OMN/OPN $ 12

OPN funds for DOG Modernization Program $ 66

Naval Integrated Fire Control Counter Air Wholeness $ 2

Fund Additional Torpedo Maintenance (OMN) $ 11

Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN) $ 7

Multi-functional Info Distribution System {MIDS) $ 10

Procure two C-40A aircraft $ 190

Procure 1 Additional E-20 $ 146

Fund E-2D Naval Integrated Fire Control -Counter Air Testing $ 11

Procure 22 EA-18G aircraft $ 2,142

T-45 Service Life Extension Program $ 20

Procure 3 STUAS and Associated Spares $ 51

Procure C-40 in FY151ost due to sequestration $ 98

H-1 Program (APN-1) (Procures 1 tail) $ 30 C-12 (APN-4) (Procures 1 tail) $ 15

KC-130J (APN -4) {Procures 1 tail) $ 75

V-22 Tanker Capability {ROTEN) $ 15

H-1 Electrical Power Improvement (ROTEN) $ 14

LCAC SLEP Funding $ 83

CH-53E Smart Multi-Function Color Display $ 8

Blue Force Situational Awareness Tool $ 12

AV-8B Link-16 Tactical Datal ink $ 19

AV-8B LITENING Gen4 upgrade $ 36

AV-8B DACA lnteroperability $ 9

MAGTF EW Improvements $ 42

USMC Aviation Commitment to GATOR Block 4 $ 10

V-221mprovements $ 32

KC-130J Block Upgrade $ 37

USMC F-181mprovements $ 71

USMC H-11mprovements $ 13

UHF Comm Relay for RQ-7B $ 3

CH-53K Reliability Improvements $ 5

Procure (1) H- lin FY15 $ 30

UH-lY Structural Improvements (APN-5) $ 6

KJ Block Upgrade A+B Kits (APN -5) $ 37

ORT Cyber Remediation (CANES) $ 46

Navy Cyber Warfare Development Group $ 3 Info Sys Sec Prgm (ISSP)/Comp Network Def (CND) $ 14

ORT Cyber Remediation (CND/Switches) $ 78

OPN Funding for SQQ-89 for 15 CGs $ 21

Commercial Broadband Satellite Program OPN $ 11

Page 13: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Mode rnlzatlon (continued) FY15 ($M)

Ship's Sig Exploit Equip and GRAYWING $ 13 Advanced Tactical Data link System (ATDLS) $ 2

Autonomous Underwater Vehicle {LBS-UUV) $ 6

Fund Additional Man Tech/Tech Insertion $ 18

Additional ROTEN for SM-2 Fleet Firings $ 9

Aegis RDT&E Funding restoral $ 36

ROTE funds to Strike Force lnteroperability {SFI) $ 3

Environmental R&D Programs $ 5

AMNS Near Surface Capability ROTEN Funding $ 8

Investment Persistent Littoral Undersea Surveillance $ 9

Next Gen Jammer Inc II Development $ 12

Fund Coop Eng Cap (CEC)/Ship's Self-Def Sys (SSDS) $ 5

Ship's Sig Exploit Equip Mods - Adv. Capabilities $ 10

Accelerate Development and Procurement ofTB-29X $ 9

Accelerate Multi-star Enhanced Prelaunch for DSLE $ 9

Classified Issue (S& T) $ 40 Fund Additional Parrotfish Research and Development $ 4

Fund Additional Navy Dive R&D $ 1

Fund Littoral Surveillance Radar System (LRSR) $ 6

Land Ship Dock (LPD) 17 Class Wholeness $ 35

Ohio Replacement Program ROTEN Reduction $ 24

LCAC Post SLEP Sustainment $ 16

Procure and sustain additional Low Profile Photonics Mast $ 17

Fund SSBN Command and Control System Modernization $ 9

Procure Additional Low Cost Conformal Arrays (LCCA) $ 18

Procure 83AIM-120D $ 62

Funds AIM-9X Blk Ill R&D $ 34

Fund Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) Operational Testing $ 4

Ship's Self Defense System (SSDS) $ 15

Classified Issue 3 $ 17

Fund SSGN Attack Weapons System Shortfall $ 17

AMNS Neutralizer Procurement $ 7

Fund JDAM Assault Breaching System(JABS) Test & Eval $ 11 Fund Additional Standard Missile OMN $ 8

Fund Additional Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) OPN $ 4

Fund Additional AIM-9X OMN $ 3

Fund Marine Mammai/Quickstrike Mine Level of Effort $ 4

Page 14: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Manpower/Training The manpower and training items listed below improve specialized training for sailors and units required to meet prescribed readiness levels and funding for the travel associated with various type of training. Also included are requests for additional support for manpower management systems as well as funding to address shortfalls in adve11ising programs needed to recruit our country's best and brightest.

Manpower /Tral nl ng FY15($M)

Range Capability Support and Fleet Synthetic Training $ 28

Training Travel Funds Increase $ 25

Common Core Training expansion (Navy e-Learning) $ 5 Mobile Small Arms Familiarization Trainers (FATS) $ 0.2

Fund Submarine Training Wholeness $ 9

KC-130J Fuselage Trainer (APN-4) $ 12

IT N 1 Legacy Restoral $ 27

Electronic Military Personnel Record System $ 2

Business Process Re-Engineering $ 5

PERS/PAY MOD (NSIPS) $ 4

Increase Temporary Duty Under Instruction (TEMDUINS) $ 20

Fund additional Bureau of Naval Personnel (BUPERS) on-line $ 2

Fund Billet Based Distribution (CMS-ID) $ 2

Advertising $ 37

Curriculum Reengineering $ 10

Training 2020 $ 10 Electronic Classrooms $ 10

Data Center Sustainment $ 10

My Navy Portal (MNP) $ 10

Authoring Instructional Materials (AIM) Tool $ 10

Recruiting Systems Modernization(NRIS/ARM/Pride) $ 10

Increased Support to Manpower and Training Establishment $ 10

Maritime Operational Planner Course $ 2

Page 15: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HQ USAt/CC 1670 Air Force Pentagon Washington. DC 20330-1670

Ol'f'IC Ofl' TH CHIEF 0 8T.A F

UNIT 0 TAT 8 .AIR FORC

W.A8HINGTON DC 20 0

The Honorable Howa.rd P. "Buck .. McKeon Chaim1an Committee on Anned Setvices United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515-6035

Dear Mr. Chainnan:

:· 2 5 -)J.

Per your request; the Air Force has identified requirements above and beyond those included in our FY 201 5 President's Budget (PB) request. These items fall into four major categories: readiness. recapitalization. modernization, and installation support. The attached li t

incorporates and builds upon the President's Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative (OGSI} . Our list includes funding to accelerate recapitalization programs such as F-35A. MQ-9 and C-1 30J , as well as moditications and upgrades to current aircraft. It would also help to reduce the large backlog of facility projects across Air Force installations. We have added four requirements to the list submitted as part of the OGSI. each of which emerged after we finalized our FY2015 PB request. With our emphasis on strengthening the nuclear enterprise. we have identified requirements as part of our Nuclear Force Improvement Program. These requirements are our# I priority in our UPL. The other additional items will allow us to better manage our military personnel drawdown plan. bridge the Combat Rescue Helicopter program until we can fully fund it in the FY 201 6-20 POM, and reduce the backlog of space weapon system sustainment.

We appreciate congressional suppot1 ofthe Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) and the 2014 appropriations. For 2014, the BBA allowed us to fully fund our flying hour program and keep our top recapitalization programs on track. It ensured we did not have to resort to drastic measures seen in FY 2013 post-sequestration, such as standing down acti ve duty fighter and bomber units, furloughing civilian Ainnen, and conducting only emerg ncy facil ity maintenance. However, the BBA provides more limited top line relief in 2015, so the Air Force is now budgeting to a topline 8 bill ion le than our previou FY 20 I 5 planning number. Within these constraints, our FY 201 5 budget request balances capability, capacity and readiness. retaining no more force structure than we can afford to keep ready today and over the coming years. While the FY 2015 budget request is our best judgment about how to allocate resources at the BBA funding level, congressional support for the items on this list, including those in the OGSI, would allow us to further recover from the effects of sequestration in FY 2013 and enhance the readiness and recapitalization prOf:,'fess we were able to make within BBA funding levels.

Page 16: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

\Vc arc incredibly fortunate to h:n-e th be t innen in the " ' rid . They ar · , ·ery proud of who they are and what they do f4 r our countr . \lie are ommitted to pro,·iding them the training. equipm nt and r ource nccc ar, to allow them t b their vcr · b t. Your full upport and tirncly ~ongre ional appro\ al of our FY 201 5 PB and unfunded priori tie will

en ure your Air Force i ready to dcli\·cr lubell l 'ig ilan e. Global Rca h and lobnl Po11· r today and in the future. hank you again tor your uppot1 and we look forward to working with your committee in this challenging fiscal erl\'ironment.

Attachment: Air Force FYI Unfunded Priority Li ·t

Very Respectfully.

('f/ 1 .. A h:dut:__ Mark~~\:~1111 G ncrnl. 'SAF Chief of StatT

Page 17: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

..... . , ... Tolll Modemlldon

USAF FY16 Praaldant'a Budget Unfunded Priority List

N\Jclear Force Improvement Progrlll'll Miilery Pay (MiPers) for Ioree menagement Combat Rescue Helicopltlf Space Weapon System Sustainment enhancement

AF Agency lor Modebng and Smulltion AF Forcea C2 courses normalization ANG Cyber Opa Squadrons (7x) Claaalfied Program (details provided upon request) Combat Air Forces Training Range lmprovementa (threats, aims) lor Anti-Access Area Denial Cyber Mosslon Force Teams OT&E Cyber Weapon System Opa Cyberspace Defense Weapon System and Cyber Mission Forces Deployable C3 Command. Control and Communlcationa progrern Readineaa Support (57 WG Backlhop mx, Ranges, CAF Exercilea. etc.) 8econd Destinllion Transportation program Weapon Storage & Security System equipment

AC-130J Weapoo System Traoner F·35 (2x) procurement F-35 FMS (3x) procurement HC-130 configuration to "J" model HC-130J (5x) procurement MC-130J (5x) procurement MQ-9 (12x) procurement

AF Otatnbuted Common Ground Svatem a Muht·INT ISR Enterprtae Col1ecllon Planner AF Distributed Common GrOI.IId System a Mu111-1NT ISR Portal ANG MQ-9 C2 lnlrastructure upgrade Automated intelanalyata tooll & applcalions AWACS Block 40145, restore B-2 Common Very low Frequency receiver; Secure, survivable llrategic comm capability B-2 Oelenaive Management System threat Info B-2 low Obserabla improvements B-52 Antl-akld replacement Battleliatd Air Operations k~ update development/procurement Boeing Broadband SatCom Network equipment on C-32A and e-.108 replacement C-130 Weapon System Trainer Infrared C-130J center wing box replacement C-5 Cora Mission ComputariWaatller Radar Program CapabiiHy to generate aarlat larglll sor1aa and 53 Weapons Evaklation Group balltltna operations Classified Program (details provided upon request) Combat Air Forces Training Range Improvements (threats, sima) lor Anti-Access Area Denial Combat Identification technology projedllevaklations Criala Action Planning & Execution Segments system lnleropabltty wiJoint Operational Planning and Execution System Clyptologlcat devices on C-37A ..,craft (9x) rep8Cement Cybtlf C2 Minion System lor full-spedrum cyber opa and jo11t mission planning Deployable radar approach control & air traflte control c;omms ROT&E Oiatributed Common Ground System • Oepbylble Surface Tannlnall Electronic llltack pod threat RepliCation Enayption algorithms and devictl for secure voice comm Expanded Science & Technology for F-X demonstration activity inct pre-AoA, concept development, ate. F-15 active eleclronlceO.,.-acanned array radar (lOx) F-15 Eagle PaaslvaiActive Waming and Survivability System F-15 Electronic Protactlon F-22 Investment Fund, restore Fiber Channel Comm Switching System & Misaion Data Sy1tem repair/replace (4K)

Gorgon st- - Wide Area Motion Imagery sensor Guardian Angel Weapons System mlaaion-orlented equipment ISR Senaora upgrade Joint Communications Support Element'• Theater Deployable Comma Joint Information Environment - Cyber capabililies Jotnt Information Environment • voice capabilities, lnstalallon proca11ing nodes Joint Information Environment - voice capabdliel, aarvlcea Joint Information Environment Delenae Entarprisa Ematt for NIPR Joint Information Environment Delanae Enterprise ErnaH for SIPR Joint Worldwtde Intelligence Communication System equipment replacement/repair Joint Worldwide lntetl gence Commurilcation System upgrades & replacements KC-135 redar capabiiMy update LAIRCM procl'llslallor C-130J and C-17 Low visibility Deployable Surface Tennlnaii/Fibef lnjed Points Low-alltude penetrating recon tach dennonllnltion Mini Air-launChed Decoy, Jamming Procurarnent, decoys (210x) Mini Air-launched Decoy, Jamming; EleCtronic Warfare (200x) Mission Planning System hanllsofl-. core capability upgrade Mobility Air Forces Mission Planning System upgrades MQ-9 Extended Range RDT&E continued development Networ1t Centric Collaborative Targeting

153.800 563,000 200,000 183,300

UtO.tll 3,500 3,170 5,008 2 ,300

89,200 55,161 49,960 29,497 17,500

221,529 41,000

940 ., .. ,. 30.000

372,263 49,500 11,400

510,000 510.000 192,000 . ..,... 11.m 25,975 8,010 9,700

71 ,500 5.000

159.400 11 ,700 6,280 9.510

10,200 20.000 19,500 16,950 7,150

197,000 32,600 15,000

8 ,000 4,900 3,155 2,110

13,500 3,000

15.000 30,000 65,000

3 ,940 31 ,000 65,000 42,900 10,000 7,400 2,500 2.600

14,900 14,200 3,600

35,000 16,000 2.733 3,100 8,300

70,000 13,500 25,000 70,000 14,000 5,191

20,000 30.000

2 ,000

Page 18: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Moclemlntion

Mr $ J ... an TOIII lnltlllltlons

Grand Total

USAF FY16 Presldenra Budget Unfunded Priority List

Nuclear C3 technology lestflg, developing slralegoes bUIIdl!lQ roadmaps. Very Low Frequency/low Frequency analy&os QF-16 Aerial Targets RC.135 Steerable Antenna (3x) Science & Technology Funded at PB14 Levell SEEK EAGLE. restore Selr Contained Navigation System upgrllde Solid Rocket Motor technology maluration for ICBM Suter Mechine-to-Machine Moderizatlon UnmaMed Alrcrefl System requirements Upgredea to JSTARS C2 infraalructure Vehicle procurement & Support Equipment

112 Oostnbuted Common Ground System f8Cikly rc-out at Beale Facility Maint-nce & Repair Facility Suatalnment to 80% MILCON, AF RelllfVtl MILCON, Air Force MIL CON. Air National Guerd NGB Contingency Reaponae Group equipment SBCurily Forces training and auatailment

706 17.200 19,320

156,986 280

8,900 55,000 5.600 2,500

38,000 54,050

42,952 1,115,934

442,852 73,700

1,159,000 139,200

789 70,000

Page 19: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

L-~_:_:_--_.;.-

4March2014

Dear Mr. Chairman:

..1

i I

j

Thank you for your letter of 14 February requesting the Marine Corps' Unfunded Requirements List. Accordingly, attached to this letter is a list of unfunded requirements that would enable the Marine Corps to meet PY15 priority mission requirements, should additional funds above those already requested in the FYlS President's Budget be made available.

The FY15 President's Budget forgoes some critical investments in order to maintain ncar-term readiness. To protect near-tenn readiness, we reduced our equipment modernization and infrastructure sustainment efforts. The lack of investment in these areas cannot be sustained long tenn and will impose future risk to readiness and increased costs. As America's crisis response force, we are required to maintain a posture that facilitates our ability to deploy at a moment's notice. The enclosed Unfunded Requirements Ust would further enhance our near-tenn readiness and invest in our longer-tenn readiness through inveatment in our equipment modernization and infrastructure sustainment.

Each of these programs is ·crucial to the Nation's defense. For example, our request for additional F-35s contained within the enclosure represents replacement of the 6 AV-8B Harrier tactical aircraft we lost due to enemy action at FOB Bastion in Afghanistan. The replacement of these aircraft will do much to enable our ability to preserve ready forces now while we transition to a fifth generation tactical aircraft capability. However, I must reiterate that additional funds for these FY15 requirements and critical capabilities cannot come at the expense of programs and capabilities resourced through the FY 1 S President's Budget Submission. Any changes to that submission would adversely impact operational capability and readiness.

I look forward to continuing our dialogue to ensure we remain the Nation's Expeditionary Force in Readiness. I appreciate your support for your Marine Corps. I remain ...

The Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon Chainnan, Committee on Anned Services House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515

Semper Fidelis,

Enclosure: (1) FY 2015 USMC Unfunded Requirements List

Copy to: The Honorable Adam Smith, Ranking Member

Page 20: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

United States Marine Corps FY15 Unfunded Priority list

($M)

-· Amount· ,, Readiness $111.5 lnfrastrvc:ture Sustainment $587.4 Equipment Modernization $74.6: Aw.tlon Raciness $294.3 Aviation Modernization $1.397.5 Am...ww-.., SUppOrt $83.0

!Total $~

Appropriation Amount OMMC $205.1 OMMCR $3.9 MPMC $12.8 PANMC $64.9

MCN $412.2 PMC $64.5 ..

$97.3' ROTEN OMN $276.2

AI'N $1,324.5 OPN $3.9

SCN $83.0

Total $2.548.3

Pagel

Page 21: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

,.,....... APPN

Speciel Purpose rMrine AK Ground Taslc Force- CENTCOM (SPMAGTF-CENTCOM) OMMC !Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Taslt Force- CENTCOM (SPMAGTF-CENTCOt.1) MPMC Special Purpose Marini! Ail Ground Task Forte- CENTCOM (.5PMAGTF-CENTCOM) MPMC

Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force- SOUTHCOM (SPMAGTF-SOUTHCO) OMMC Specill Purpose Marine IW Ground Task Forte- SOUTHCOM SPMAGTF-SOUTliCOM)_ MPMC

Special Pwpose M8rine Ai.r Ground T8slc Force- SOIJTHCOM (SPMAGTF-SOUTHCOM) MPMC

' I

I I

:Coml!lltiollll Ground Ammunition PANMC

Total RAdlness

Readiness ($M)

l....._l.he Anloant

1A1A $ 28.6

BA1 $ 0.6

BA2 $ 5.8

1A1A $ 5.2

BAl $ 0.6

IAZ $ s.a

1471 $ 64.9

$U1.S

Pase2

DeKrlplloo

PnMdes funds for the new SPMAGTF-C£NTtOM ttat wll counter emerJfn1 tlwats and crises In the CENTCOM AOR. 1M SPMAGTF Cllllducts crisis response and lmlt2d CIOIDIIIIICV openltlans. The SPMAGTF is trained U1 conduct security, quick raction force, llmlled olrensiw/dl!fenslvoe oper atlons. tacticall"eCXM!rf of aiR:raft and persomel.llmltaf humanbrlln assistance, and lmlted nan-lcDmbatant evaaatiDn oper atlal1 missions. i'rowldes Ina era~utal pay and llllowalas for Marine Ofticets while fonnrd

In the carn:oM AOR. PnMdes Incremental pay llld allowancas for Enlsted Marines whle forward

in the CENTCOM AOR.

PnMdes funds for the new SPMAGTF-SOUTHCOM that wRJ counter emeratnc 1hreats nr crises In the SOUTHCOM AOR. The SPMAGTF conduCts criSis raponse and lmlted continpncy oper.tlalas. The SPMAGTF Is trained to conduct security, quick I'Ddian force, limited offei\Siveldefl!nsi opel--. tactic:al recovery of lin:raft and personnel, lmltl!d hucnanll:art.n assislance, and limited nan-combltant ewcwtion operation misslans. Provides lnaemetltal pay and llalwancl!s for Marine Officers while forward i

in theSOUTHCOM AOR. Provides Incremental pay and .. owances fDr Enlisted Mar1nes while forWIC'd depkJyed In the SOU1lfCOM AOR.

Flnfs wDI procure the tOCD7 Roc:laet. Common Practice (CP) Shoulder Mounted Assault Weapon (SMAW). These Rodcllts wll replenish munitions expendld by

Mlrlne Forces cbtnt tBinin& ~ ation and rellaanals fDr combat In support of the TCICII Munitions AeQuln!ments {TMR).

Page 22: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Pn:lpul ~ Facilities SUstainment OMMC Fadlitles Sustainment OMMCR Faclltles Demolition OMMC

Facilities Restoration & Modemlzatlon OMMC

P1280 2nd Radio Bn Complex, Phase I 0 MCB Lejeune,

Rcbonvllle. NC MCN

P1346 Simulator lntaeratlon/Ran&e Control Fldllty II MCB Lejeune, Jaclcsonvlle, NC MCN

P474 Townsend Bombin& Ren&e Acquisition- Phase 2 0 MCAS Beaufort. sc MCN

P902 Electrical Distribution & Airfield Lilhtifll UPif'lde$ fJ MCB Hawaii MCN

P910 Bachelor Enlisted Qamrters • MCB HawaB MCN

P602 MAWTS-1 CALA Maintenance Facllltv 0 MCAS Yuma, AZ MCN ..

lnfrastrucbn Sustainment ($M}

~Lin· Amount

BSM1 $ 106.8 IBuvs to~ of 0o0 ~sustainment requirement. BSSl $ 3.9 IBwsto ~of DoOt.clltles sustailtment ~ BSMl $ i7JJ Funds &50K sq...-.t.etofdefemd demolition ~

Funds fedlltles restoration and modet 1 datb 1 requlrwments to support continued BSMl $ 47.5 Q2 (fair) standards.

Consolidates Radio BaUallon requirements Into a sfnCie location. Supports expanded MARFORtYBER miukln. Includes control centar, battabon aid station.

670011280 $ 50.7 and HHCIQUM'terS.

~ a 127IC sq~are foot consolid.-1 simulator ln1elntlon center to 670011346 $ S2A ~additional tral~devices .nd ~fielded at.c.mp Lejeune.

Acquires appr'CIIIdrnetelv 10,000 acres of prlmartly undeveloped, mlnim.tly Improved lands surroundlnt Townsend 8omblnl Rlnp for the purposes of aa:omrnodlltin8 reqtM'ed missions indudlr,. the use of Precision Guided Munitions

60169474 $ 42.3 (PGMs). Completes the total purchase of 42.000 aaes.

Uppades and modifies the airfield IIBfrtlnl system in order to meet current cedes and standards. The main swllt:hlng station Is corroding due to the saJt air concftlons. causing the electrlall clstrlbutlon system to detBtorate. Airfield llhtlnc does not meet current elecb1cal codes and standards, since camponents

00318902 $ 26.1 used are obsolete. deb!llorated .-Mf beyond their shelf lives.

Constructs a 102 room (204 man spaces) permanent party Bachelor E~ Quwters, with associated parlclnc structtn. intended to support the movement of HMLA, VMM, VMU squadrons and MWS detachment to the base. Bamleks space Insufficient to meet the requirements of the Increased Maline personnel being

00318910 $ 65.4 assilned to MCB Hawaii.

Constructs a new Combat ARraft loldins Area (CALA) Malntenanat Facility for both fbced and rotary win& ain:nft and pnMdes space needed for additional alrtraft mllntenllnc:e. Maintenance on fixed wtnalnd rotary ein:nft utillzlna the fMN~" CALAIs normaly c:onduded on the ex1st1rw partctna apron which lades ~heltw to pro111ct maintenlnce personnel In hot or rainy conditions. lnoperatM ~ must be towedJbxied to rnmtenanc:e hanprs that are far from the

62974602 $ 46.1 _.stlnl CALA partJnaapron.

Pap3

Page 23: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

APPN .... Une ~

Project aeates new security fenc:lnc, new patrol access roads, paves existing patrol access roads. relocates aeneral stDrate shed. and relocates hazardous waste storaae area. CUrrently, the airfield does not meet the physical security

requirements for a Level n restrleted area and F-35 basing. Numerous access P222 Airfield Security • MCAS Cherry Point, NC MCN 67399222 $ 19.1 points to the airfield do not hilve sufficient aa:ess CGI'Itrol. P610 Expeditionary Warfare School Ac8demk: Facility • MCB Quantico, VA MCN 00264610 $ 84.5 Constructs • new faeRy for Expedltionlry Warfare School (EWS).

Construc:ts I compliant AT/FP pte for security and Sllfety. FKilty Includes 1 pte IJuard house/vlsltDr center, canopies, pa over-wmh str'UCtl.n. and ro.d & utility Improvements. FaciBty wlllfve Marines potectlon from elements when

P647 Security Gam I ents • MCAF Quantico, VA MCN 00262647 $ 5.1 lnspectiiiJa vehicle and for detalnlnl clrlvers ...,,_ UMUthorized admission.

MILCON funds support plannfnland deslp of major construction and real P101 Planninl.,d Desiln MCN 64482101 $ 19.8 (over $7SOK) for Mwlne Corps --nts. !_otallnfnlstruc:b.we $ S87A

hp4

Page 24: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

APPN

~nee Power Sourtes PMC

Combat Operations Center PMC

TOW Guided Weapon Mod PMC

MlAl Modification ICits PMC

Family of Construction Equipment PMC FamHyof w.terSys PMC

Science & TechnoiOIY {s&T) ROTEN

Science & r...,., •(S&'O ROTEN

Equipment Modernization ($M)

........ Une Amount

Funds the p-oanment of Ground Renewable Expedlkx•ry EneriY Network Systems (GREENS); funds the transition of Mobile Hybrid Ellpecfrtionary Power Systems (MHEPS) Lilht to a P0R; funds the fleldlnt of critical renewable eneray

6366 s 2.9 land power CIXIYS'Sion systems to forces to be more enei'IY efficient.

Funds the malnc.nance of an addltionai12S Combat Operations Centers to Include the fteldlnl of version 2 thrOUBh VW'IIon 4 Mrdww'e refresh In support of a common hardware baseline. Sustains the existin& software baseline necessary to maintain Approwl to Operate and lntecJ atfon with Tlctlr:ll Service Oriented Ard'lltec:bft. Jomt Tactical Convnlnd Opentlonal Picture Woabtallon and

14190 $ 6.3 '' ... -, d and Control Personal

Funds the procurement of replacement missle assets that have reeched end of service rife. It wll also malraln the TOW missile Inventory beyond FYDP necessary to meet tralnln& current end c:ontincencY openltioi ts. TOW 2A drops to appie»dtiiately 20% of Total Munitions Requirement by Fn9. Procurement of new

3123 $ 32.5 TOW·2A and TOW-88 missiles will W.rReerw Procures Generation IV Abrams Ammunition Rllclc to prevent ammunition fires and brtna the fleet of Marine Corps M1Al tank fleet to a slncle. common, ammuntlon

2061 $ 3.3 rack ......

Funds the replacement of MCUSO dozer and scraper, and fieldlns of Marine Corps TKtlcal Weld Shop (MCTWS). It will also fund the deYelopment of a new mattinc system, perform a SeMce life Extension Prosr-n of Roller Com~ctors and

6544 $ 14.1 Meclwn Crawler TrKtar (MCT) and Welder Prolnrns. 6274 $ 5.4 Procures Tactical water Chillers and Small Unit w~ Purifiers.

Funds Initiation of fow naw starts In USMC Applied Resarch, which is the systemlltic application of lcnowledp to dewlap useful mat~ rials. devic:e:s, and

0&02131M $ 2.4 systems or methods.

en.bles Joint Non-l.athal Weapons Pqrlm (JNLWP) Applied Reseln:h to advance combat development activities for non-lethal effect (NLE) capebales across the 5erYices. addlni emphasis on analysis of abmatlve solutions for JROC-approved

0602651M $ 0.3 counter-materiel , ....

PaleS

Page 25: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

~ APPN BudptUne Amouat Desatption

Enables Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Propam (JNLWP) Technolorf DeYelopment tD

advance comt.t deow eiDplnent far n~ effect (NLE) c:apabiQtles across the

Services, addinl emphasis on 11111ysis of alternltNe solutions for JROC~ Science& T (S&Tl ROTEN 0603651M $ 0.6 f'"WV"'"" mlteliel ok. 'PIJS,

FundlnJ would ac:c:elerata the deveJopment of new capabilities for the advaiiCI!ment of requirlln:Jents impentiYe tD the TICtical Robodc: Controller (TRC) ~nd a MAGTF robotic collabcntlon for common opeatlonll pictum. These two c:a.-.es combined allow for shared robotic data whlth wll feed dlrectlv lntD

Sc:ienca & Tecmolor~ (s&T) ROTEN 0603640M $ 2.2 Marine Corps w ............. Lib (MCWI.) exDerlmentldon.

F1n:Js three additional transitions from the Marine Corps Landini Force Selena! & r~·-Y <s&1l ROTEN $ 4.6 T< , Pf'OII'IIII eiMnent tD Advanced T< Demonstrltion phase.

lrot.~ Madanlzation $ 74.&

Pap6

Page 26: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Aviation Readiness ($M)

Pra&nm APPN BudlletUne Amount Contract l.olistics Sustainment Fundin& for maintenance keeps the

Power by the How lA9A Restoration (KC·l30J) OMN 1A9A s 13.9 I reauisite number of aircraft wailable for use. Contract L.Gifstlcs Sustainment Funding for maintenance keeps the

Power by the Hour lA9A Restomlon (F-358) OMN lA9A $ 103.8 reaulslte number of aircraft avaDable for use. Contract LOifstlcs SUstainment Fundfnl for maintenance keeps the

Power by the Hour 1A9A Restomlon (F--3SC) OMN lA9A $ 84.4 reaulslte number of llra'aft available for use. Contract Logistics Sustainment Fundirc for maintenance keeps the

Power by the Hour 1A9A Restlorltion (MV-22) OMN 1A9A $ 57.0 I reaulsitll number of airaaft available for use. ll'rocures four sets Of o-tevel support equipment to stve spedflc MV-22

squadrons the~ to conduct duakite operations with rio dearadation to sortie aeneration at either location. 'This is a c:hanle to doctrinal

V-22 Detachment t:apabllty APN 0164 $ lS.l emDiovment of a VMM squadron. ·vn..,.._.,o:!AirSUpport (OAS) bya,..,...-·-~·1 !IUU _, ....... .: Oose

AJr Support hcus tD Expeditionary Wriwe Tralnina Groups (EWTGs). This translates to approximately 2,000 fixed-wing controls (an average of 35% of the total required controls per year for each of the EWTGs) with ordnance

Contnlc:t 0ose A1r SUODCrt OMN 1A1A $ 4.5 (LGTR and MK-76). Contract Logistics Sustainment Fundq for maintenance keeps the

JSF-F-3SB as OMN 1A9A $ 12.6 I requisite number of aircraft available for use.

Funds Improvements to the Aviatfon l.oliStlcs {AVLOG) support capabilities to geasraphicaUy distributed air operations In the Pacific theater whHe reducins reiance on 20+ year old lepcy Marine Aviation Loctstics Support

Modernization for Marine Awllltlon lDKlstlcs SUpport Prolram ROTEN 0605013N $ 3.0 Prom-am methodolo«ies for d AVLOG operations.

'Total Avbltlon Rel•ness $294.3

Pap7

Page 27: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

I

~ I

Sx F-3SC Combat lteplac:ement

lx F-358 Combat Replacement

~1 m

-40

KC-13QI

V-12 Tanlcer Capability

AV-88

APPN

APN

APN

APN

APN

APH

ROTEN

RDTEN

Aviation Modemization ($M)

Line Am aunt Desolptiolt Procures 5 F-3SC JSF airtraft: to replace OVerseas Contingency loss of 5 AV-

$ 875.5 8Bs on 14 Se 2012 Procures 1 F-358 JSF alrtraft to replace OVerseas CCXJtlngency loss of 1 AV-

$ 14L6 88 on 14 Sep 2012.

0178 $

0246 $

0416 $

0604262N $

214N $

Pap8

Page 28: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

AV-88 DACAS I bility

H-1 T401CE'

MAGTF EW-Sof'twan! mabfel'avll*f

MATCAI.S G/ATOR Block 4 EASR

MATCAI..S A TNAVICS ECP: Mode Ss

UH-lY Strucbnl

MATCAL5 EW- Electronic Warfare SeMc:es Architecture

MAGTFEW-

'

i. I UC-12W

I

I

APPN .... APN 0514 $

,APN 0532 $

RDTEN I0604376M I $

ROTEN I0604504N I $

OPN

APN

2815 $ 3.9 ana IncorporateS oeny access panelS ana strUCtUral PfO\IISIOOS.

include new aircraft skins, for the Defense Armament System. Installing these new skins dLrif11 scheduled depot maintenance provides an opportunity to also Install structural nlinfoc cement pnMslons required to eliminate the UH-1N hold-over limitation on external stores. InStalling access panels increases aircraft refilbltity, whHe reducing maintenance

0532 I $ 6.8 ltlme on aircraft. ftrijs the Marine AirTniffiCControland lindlni-System (MATCAlS) Electronic Warfare Services Architl!cture. which Wl11 provide an enabling

6M I $ 3.9 !capability to facilitate Collaborative EW {CEW). Funds the expansion arid lmproyement of edsting Intrepid T.lger II Electronic Warfare capability. This capability delivers fixed and rotary

$ 30.5 lwlnl aircraft Electronic Attack Procures and Instals ~Vision '"-Ifni 5¥stan competJble eJdler1or llshtina.

$ 2.3 llnlaior c:odcplt cftsiUys. and PI If! f'CI!I' COIIIJM Uilel"'t

Procures (1) UC-12W Extended R8111R alrcnlftht has the,.,._ .nd prylwd

c:aplblltles requiNd to pn:Mde .tfec:tM Of*dOMI airlift In support of forward $ 15.1ldlllkMd M.tne units.

Pap9

Page 29: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

II I J

Page 30: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

APPN l..ancllnc Craft Air CUshion (I.CAC) Service Life Extension f'rolram (SLEP) SCN

:TOial Amphibious 5apport

Amphibious SUpport I$M}

.............. Amount Description Funds the .a::elesatlon of four LCAC SlEP to further enhance ship to shore

5139 $ 83.0 .._

for amphtious s.

-.$13.0_

Papll

Page 31: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

TABB

Page 32: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU 11 PENTAGON 'ASHJNGTOH DC 301-1

2 0 MAR 2014

The Honorable Howard *Buck• McKeon Chairman Committee on Armed Services U.S. Hou e of Representatives Wa hington, DC 20515-6035

Dear Mr. Chairman:

The National Guard's Fiscal Year 2015 unfunded priority list emphasizes requirements important to maintain an agile, skilled, and ready force po tured to support our Nation's mia ions.

A core competency of the National Guard i to rapidly, robustly, and competently expand the Nation's full -spectrum military capability to defend vital national interests in the most affordable, lowest ri k manner po aible. The National Guard remains ready to expand the capacity of the President and our Governors to meet the needs of the American people. Funding the requirements in the enclosure helps leverage the benefits of the National Guard for the Department of Defense and the Nation.

Thank you for your continued support of our Soldiers and Airmen. I look forward to working with you to maintain a ready and capable National Guard.

Enclosures: As stated

Sincerely,

1~J.!L--Frank J. Gras General, U.S. Army Chief, National Guard Bureau

Page 33: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)
Page 34: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)
Page 35: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)
Page 36: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)
Page 37: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

TABC

Page 38: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

U IT

March 4, 2014

The Honorable Howard P. ·suck· McKeon Chairman. Commrttee on Armed Services U.S. House of Re~ Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

This letter provides the U.S. Special Operations Command's (USSOCOM's) Fiscal Year 2015 Congressional Unfunded Requirements (C-UFR) List. USSOCOM'a unfunded list totals $400 million. I am providing this list in response to your request for our unfunded priortty list. dated February 14. 2014.

USSOCOM's request llddreuea the moat pre•ing readine s and tnfr structure requ ntmenta not contained m the FY 2015 Preaident's ~ subrn' ion. It 1ncludes milrtary conttruet1on, institutional and unit training, intelligence, IUMtillance, and reconna· nee funding. nd recapitalization/modernization of Command, Control. Communications. Computers and Intelligence systems. A breakout by category ia encloaed.

Similar letters have been provided to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Defense Oversight Committees. Thank you for your continued support of SOF.

Sincerely.

Enclosure

Copy Furnished: The Honorable Adam Smith Ranking Member. Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives Washington. DC 20515

Page 39: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

- - USSOCOM "Investment Fund" for Opport~nity, Growth and_ Security I -

I FY 2015 REQUEST

CATEGORY SUB-CATEGORY UFR o .. cripUon RES CAT (SK) Rt~intH

11ncreases operational training from 66% to 76% or FMno Hours required aireteW ll'eining hours O&M 95.950

.v ....... me ::IUt--unoque n111\WUO\, oaUI. 5ef'V10811. ano lpplocations 101' Process~ Exploltalioo and Dissemtnation (PEf?). advanced ana~Yta and SOF ISR Enterprise. Provides dedicated PED for M0-9 platforms. Provides SIE reach bldt neiWofk using SATCOM alrtimelbandwldlh necessary to take

Qrg.,IC ISR Intelligence products from b8tlleleld to PED eels. O&M 47,916 Funda lt1e USSOCOM Enterpnse Wide Tralnrlg and Ellerolle Program whim consolidatea COIIedfve tra1ntng enauring the ~I'll u .. of rnourcec going to l'hN*ef Spldlll OperatJOnt ~ (TSOCSJ and Components. Thtt additlot'\11 funding ,.,-ur· the BaH rtqutsl by and addilionllll7~ which f\Aly enabiM lmplementaflon of the consolic;.led progrem In FY15

lnltilutional Training O&M 48,52.6 Supporll endurlng day-to-day training optrlliont conducted by JSOC high priOI'ity unill (trlv.l. lrWIIPQI1. oonaumables. range support. etc.). Providn an addrtlonal 23% to the Base request In order k) enhllnce overall unit Readiness criti~l lo million sucoets.

Unit SuslalnmanUTmg O&M 25,221

Funds will be used to lntegrete the TSOCs and Components into lhe SOF nformalion Environment. providing robu11 globll access to C41 ent8IJ)rile services. This10% Increase to our Ba reque~t will enable en accelereted lhlckerung and improved

C4 Modemitalion raNablity of the Global SOF IT netwottr. . O&M 43.596

Funds wil be used to integrate 1M TSOC. and Components irWJ the SOF lnfonndon Envinlnment. providing global access to C41 enlerprise 181'Vice1 support by Integrated network operlllons. This ful request provides ror communication requnments lhllt

C4 Modemtzation are currently unreeourced in lhe FYOP. PROC 85,108

Feclllty Sultlllnmenl See project lilt below. MIL CON 53.587

Suppolt& project tor SOF Mime SpecieJ ~ Regiment HOI. Clmp ~- NC (UM). 8nd SOf Admlnlatratlve/Compeny Operations. Ft. Bragg. NC S1M) P&D 1,841

supports llle purChase of colllter .. eqwpmenl fOr MILCON projects. . O&M 275

MILCON PROJECT LIST LOCATION 0.1Crlptlon FUNDING Wltll a 1paoe ~ ~ •• ...., ·-·, 1

comprehensive Human Performance Center tNt emphuims rangth conditioning, nutrition. , .., .......... lion, injury prevention. , evaruatlon.

SOF Human Performenoe Center Dam Neck. VA rtiMI'Ctllnd 11 .147 IPtovidea a trlining lacMy lOf numan _t""' ...... --

concrllionir1g. spom medlcint. hydrothtrlpy, SOF Facility Augmentation-Human comballves. locker room•. behaVIOr health and Perlormence Cent« Torti Station, Japan claaarooms. 7900

Provides Spectal Operations Marine with spaces for administration. phy111cal therapy. physical performance

SOF Performance ReaiUency Center Camp Leteune, NC educatiOn and tralfllllg. and nutrit100 ed~!ion. 14,~00

Constructs a parking area for Stryker vehicles and an addHional covered ma•ntenonce area for the Tactical

SOF St'Ytler Maintenance Area Fort Lewis. WA Equipment Maintenance Facility. 3,520

ProvkiH an adequate flclbty that 11 property sized end SOF NSAV Mod·2 Bay Hangar/AMU CIMon AFB, NM configured for multi-bay medium-siZed ainnft. 18.600

- MILCON Project Llll -- • 5!,M7

- TOTAL UISOCOM PORTION OF DOD $21 BILLION IUIMIB&ION - • 400,000

Page 40: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

TE OT

General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr. Commander, United States Northern Command 250 Vandenberg Street, Suite 8016 Peterson AFB CO 80914-3801

The Honorable Howard P. "Buck" McKeon Chairman Committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515

Dear Mr. Chainnan:

MAR 10 2014

In accordance with the FY13 NOAA, I am writing to inform you we do not have any FY15 unfunded requirements. This Ia primarily a result of DOD'a fiacal guidance that identified Homeland Oefanae as the Department's top priority. In addition, the temporary budget relief provided by the BI-Partl an Budget Act of 2013 allowed the Services to address many of our top capability concerns, thus helping to mitigate risk areas for our operational requirements. Lastly, every Service identified additional capabilities for consideration in the Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative Fund that accompanied the.FY15 PrMident's Budget, which could also further Increase readiness and maintenance in critical areas.

We still have concerns regarding FY16 and beyond due to sequester funding levels, and look forwtNd to WOitdng with you on these In the future. I'm grateful for your leadership aa we collectively work through these budget challenges.

cc: The Honorable Adam Smith Ranking Member

Sincerely,

~~ General, USA Commander

Page 41: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

COMMANDE , U •. PACI IC CO MAND (U PACOM)

CAMP H .M . MITH. HAWAII9 1-4028

H w rd "Buck" P. M K n

Endosure: Additional Program Infom1ation

PY to ; Th~ H n bt Ad m mith R nl..ing Mem

rch 2 • 0 14

I .9M 1. M

Page 42: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

.e U.S. Pacific Command Unfunded Priorities (FY15} PROGRAM APPN Service Qty $M

PREPO Munition Shortfall Mitigation O&M Air Force 19.1

Munitions

AdvanC:ed Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile - AMRAAM (AIM-120D)

Air Force PROC Air Force 16 27.2 Navy PROC Navy 15 19.5

SubTotal 31 46.7

Air Intercept Missile - SIDEWINDER (AIM-9X Block II) Air Force PROC Air Force 20 8.8 Navy PROC Navy 10 4.6

Sub Total 30 13.4

Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range (JASSM-ER)

Air Force PROC Air Force 15 22.5

Sub Total 15 22.5

Guided Multiple Launched Rocket System-Alternate Warhead (GMLRS-AW)

Army PROC Army 180 19.8

Sub Total 180 19.8

Cluster Bomb Unit {CBU)-105 Sensor Fuzed Weapon Munitions (SFW) (P31) Air Force PROC Air Force 30 7.8

SubTotal 30 7.8

Guided Bomb Unit {GBU)- 31V3 (BLU-109) Munitions Air Force PROC Air Force 264 16.1

SubTotal 264 16.1

Munitions Sub Total 126.3

QUEUFIRE Military Intelligence Program Funding Shortfall O&M NSA 19.0

TOTAL 164.4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Enclosure 1

Page 43: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Enclosure 1

FY15 USSOUTHCOM Unfunded Requirements

Below are the unresolved USSOUTHCOM funding issues:

a. FOPEN LIDAR: USSOUTHCOM is currently operating the UHF Single Aperture Radar (SAR), Foliage Penetration (FOPEN-TRACER) system to conduct airborne intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR). Although TRACER has proven to be a valuable system, but it lacks the critical special resolution and fidelity that a FOPEN LIDAR system such as FALCON-I provides. The command will build on the success of the FALCON-I Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD), which concludes in June 2014, by operating this system in the USSOUTHCOM Area of Responsibility (AOR). In addition, USSOUTHCOM lacks an adequate counter­concealment/foliage-penetrating, high resolution collection capability which in tum hinders our ability to detect, locate and track High Value Targets (HVT) and elements of Transnational Organized Crime (TOC). The FOPEN LIDAR system would solve this shortfall as well. The system provides the necessary enhanced ability to locate and collect vital information on HVTs and the elements of terrorism and TOC including construction sites for self-propelled semi-submersible (SPSS) vessels and fully submersible vessels (FSV), hydrochloride labs (HCL), adversary lines of communication (LOC) as well as weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The system will allow the command to perform the kind of vital collection, processing and fusion of multi-source information necessary to produce a comprehensive view of targets obscured by foliage and/or weather. The funding requested would pay for the operation and maintenance of the LIDAR sensor as well as the cost of the processing, exploitation and dissemination of the data it collects.

Appropriation: OMA, OSDPE: OPOGMTOT, APE: 411000000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

b. C41 IT Resources Restoral: As a stand-alone command, without the C41 support normally available on a military installation, USSOUTHCOM has a fixed minimum level of required C41 services necessary to support both daily operations and future contingencies. While the costs of these requirements remain relatively unchanged from year to year, the command continues to absorb decrements which force us to raid mission funding in order to continue performing these critical C41 functions. So, as Army repeatedly decrements our C41 account, not only is the Command, Control and Communications mission threatened, but we are forced to vacate planned exercises with partner nations and cancel various military-to-military engagements. This practice has had the unintended consequence of eroding our presence and influence in our AOR and thereby emboldening bad actors in the region.

Page 44: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

lJ

Restoration of the decrement described in this issue would be an important step in reversing this negative trend. Army levied this reduction in BESPOM 14-18 BF3.0 position of March 2012 without prior coordination with the Combatant Command. In addition to the broader theater engagement losses described above, the specific loss to our C41 program would be extensive if the decrement goes unresolved: severe restriction of maintenance support of USSOUTHCOM's network equipment, restriction of all wireless capability including secret-secure cellular phones,

PDA and SME-PED services. In addition it would impair the C4 services to USSOUTHCOM's Washington Field Office including telephone and computer network services. It would result in the loss of 23 contract personnel who support HQ's VTC capabilities, system administrators, message processing center and the IT help desk. This loss would, in turn, result in delayed responses in maintaining 6 major networks impacting communications for the HQ and 25 SCOs. Finally, lifecycle periodicity for 1,750 NIPR and 2,100 SIPR workstations, already stretched beyond their normal interval, would have to be extended further. Request restoration of this critical funding to our C41 program.

Appropriation : OMA, OSDPE: 0201115A, APE: 138215000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

c. Maritime Support Vessel (MSV) (commercial vessel): USSOUTHCOM requires a 1.0 year-round presence of a forward staging vessel or MSV to support Special Operation Forces (SOF) operations and engagements throughout the AOR. The vessel will provide a multi-functional Special Operations-specific platform capable of supporting a Crisis Response Force and provide a persistent presence in the maritime domain. The MSV will support SOF operations, Building Partner Capacity (BPC) activities, Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief (HAIDR) and provides incidentals support to Detection & Monitoring operations.

d. Security Cooperation Offices (SCO) C4 Theater Support Issue: The funding requested will enable actionable intelligence and information exchange to conduct counternarcotic operations (e.g., Detection and Monitoring) which in turn facilitates joint interdiction and disruption of illicit drug trafficking . This program supports C41 infrastructure for imagery and surveillance against Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCO) and facilitates analysis in support of U.S. law enforcement agencies and partner nations. It provides the communications infrastructure, automatic data processing equipment and on-site technical representatives (OSTR) for counternarcotic missions

2

Page 45: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

and traditional security assistance and security cooperation activities in 25 Security Cooperation Offices (SCO) located across the AOR.

Appropriation : OMA, OSDPE: 0201115A, APE: 138215000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

e. Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Resources Restoral : In the BESPOM 1519 process, Army reduced funding to the USSOUTHCOM ISR program to below critical levels and we seek restoration of funding across the FYDP. We accept the PF4.0 position decrement, which cuts our program by $2.1 M to $2.7M per year across the FYDP, but take exception to the PF3.0 position decrement of $7.8M per year. The latter cut was part of a wider Army initiative to reduce contractor support across the service. USSOUTHCOM supports this goal and has reduced contracted costs significantly across the enterprise over the past several years; however, this particular ISR program is unique in that, as part of the PBR review process, OUSD concluded that contract support was the only way to sustain it, especially in light of the absence of any GFMAP mitigation. Also, this ISR program is one of the few means we have to assist our vital partner nation of Colombia and demonstrate concretely that they have U.S. support in their fight against the FARC and other groups that threaten democracy and the rule of law. The annual decrement in FY16-20 equates to the loss of one of only two 8200 aircraft currently in theater or 1100 SIGINT flying hours. This would completely eliminate the critical two-aircraft gao-location flights that provide the most accurate SIGINT results. Cutting this program so drastically sends the wrong message throughout the region. For these reasons, the USSOUTHCOM ISR program should be exempted from service-wide cuts aimed at reducing contract dependence and cost. Request partial restoration of funding as shown in order to provide the necessary critical support to USSOUTHCOM SIGINT.

Appropriation: OMA, OSDPE: OPOGMTOT, APE: 411000000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

f. USSOCSOUTH C41 IT: Resourcing this issue will provide critical SIPR and NIPR life-cycle replacement, a Field Technical Unit (FTU), maintenance and lifecycle support for the Storage Area Networks (SANs), essential VTC capabilities, as well as Automated Information Systems (AIS) support and an array of required licenses for USSOCSOUTH. In essence, this is SOC SO HQs only C4 funding line. The requested requirements of this issue were validated by Army CIO/G6 as part of the POM 15-19 process and ultimately funded by OUSD in RMD 700A2 of 06 March 2014. The RMD funding appeared in the President's Budget position; however, the latest Army POM

3

Page 46: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

position removes the funding from USSOUTHCOM budget in FY16-20 in violation of the Joint Task Assignment Process (JTAP) rules. Request restoration of this vital funding.

Appropriation: OMA, OSDPE: 0201115A, APE: 138215000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

g. Continuity of Operations (COOP): NSPD 51 specifies that commands must have an integrated; overlapping continuity capability to ensure they can continue to perform essential C41 functions under a broad range of emergency circumstances. USSOUTHCOM received validation and funding for this program from OUSD in RMD 700 of 23 December 2009 as part of. Program Budget Review 2011 (PBR 11 ). The RMD directed Army to fund and . sustain the USSOUTHCOM COOP. We received $4.1 M in FY11; however, Army has not yet provided the sustainment funding of $1.4M/year in the out-years. This funding will cover the use of Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) servers and Storage Area Network System (SANS) as well as critical equipment purchases including switches, routers and firewalls necessary for the system to operate. If funding is not restored, USSOUTHCOM cannot comply with NSPD 51 and our ability to rapidly recover data and ensure continuity of critical C4 Mission Essential Functions (MEF) will be seriously threatened. Our location, in a hurricane-prone area, makes COOP a critical requirement.

Appropriation: OMA, OSDPE: 0201115A, APE: 138215000 Programmatics for this shortfall shown below:

4

Page 47: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

R pi o: USSTRA TCOM/JOC 901 SA BLVD ST' 2A I OFFUTT AFB N 68113-6000

· The Honorable· Howard P. McKeon, Chairman Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives Washingt n 20515-200 I

Dear Chairman McKeon

· 20 MAR l4 SHIT L0 33- l4

U TRA M appreciate your continued supponas we w rk to meet Budget ontrol Act fi cal and operational challenge .

Passage of the Bi-Partisan Budget Act and FY 14 omnibus appropriation is particularly appreciated and helps reduce near-term budget uncertainty. But as Secretary Hagel ha indicated. the Department still face.s ''significant readiness and modernization challenges next year'' and the Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative included with the President' Budget i intended to close the gap and bring unit readiness and equipment "closer to standard .·

USSTRA T OM full participated in the development of th President' budget and f< rmulatioh of the Opportunity, Growth and Security Initiative. Combined, these submi ·sions suppon my priori investments in nuclear command. control and communications (N 3). recapitalization of strategic delivery systems and weapon program · impro ements in space situational awaren s {SSA) and protection of the Nation's space capabilities; continued fielding of yber Mi ion Force ; improvements in missile defense sensor technology and Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles (EKV); and timely replacement of our aging command and control tacility .

• Per your request. I' ve attached a list of additional item for y ur consideration if resources abo\'e the Pre ident' Budget are made available. Thi list i c mpri. ed of programs falling into three categories: re toral of funding for high pri rity programs marked below the President 's Budget in the FY 14 Appropriation bill. readiness concerns. and hi h p yofT initiatives.

Again, thank you for your support and consideration of the Depat1ment's fi scal challenge .

Sincerely

l~l fk-~ C.D.HA~ Admiral. U.S. Navy Commander

Attachment : As stated

Page 48: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

Attachment

Restoral of FY14 Reductions

Mission PlanninJ & Analysis System (Strat War Plan System/lnte1rated Strat Plannlna & Analysis Net)

FV15 Enhancement: $6.0M (AF ROT&E / L-127)

. Restores modernization f unding for the nation's only strategic planning system. Restoration is essential

to reverse declining reliability, meet crisis-action response timelines and maintain synchronization with

USSTRATCOM's transition to its new C2 Complex.

Tactical Data Networks I Airborne Network Enterprise

FV15 Enhancem ent: $3.0M (OW RDT&E I L-61)

Restores funding required for Presidential secure mobile communications in the National Capitol Region.

USCYBERCOM Command Activities

FV-15 Enhancement: $30.0M (AF RDT&E I L-169)

Maintains critical cyber tool and capability development necessary t o meet warfighting objectives and

enables USCC's ability to "Defend the Nation" in response to foreign hostile action or Imminent threats

in cyberspace.

Joint Tactical Ground System (JTAGS) Pre-planned Product Improvement (P31)

FV15 Enhancement: $10.0M (Army ROT&E I l-178)

Eliminates 2-year delay In ability to provide mission critical missile warning for forward deployed forces.

Readiness

Reasan Test Site (RTS) Space Situational Awareness (SSA) Operations Support

FY15 Enhancement: $11 .0M (Army ROT& I l -136)

Restores funding ne ded to support ICBM I SLBM tests, maintain required sensor reca ll times to track

short- or no-not ice foreign launches, and meet space surveillance requirements.

Mobile Ground System (MGS)

FY15 Enhancement: $5.0M (AF ROTE I l-68)

Procures critical spare parts and addresses obsolescence issues with the Nation's sole survivable I endurable missile warning and attack assessment system supporting national leadership across all

phases of military operations.

Page 49: Unfunded Priorities List (MOC McKeon)

B·Z low Observable. and Supportability Modlflcatfons (LOSSM)

FYlS Enhancement: $4.5M (AF ROT&E / L-125)

Addresses the number one B-2 maintenance issue. Funding reduces LO maintenance required,

increases aircraft availability and improves the combat-ready LO signature for the 8-2 fleet ensuring

survivable combat operations.

E-68 Sustainment

FV15 Enhancement: $3.5M (Navy O&M /l-80)

Funds E-68 Integrated logistics Support (ILS) at level needed to meet fleet/technical support and supply

response time requirements. Funds equipment I spares required to maintain War Reserve Kits and

development, integration, validation, test, and training efforts.

STRATCOM Mission Fundlns Restoration

FYlS Enhancement: $36.6M (AF O&M I SAG lSA & 12A/l-120 & l-70)

Restores funding required to sustain USSTRATCOM's strategic planning system and support the

Command's operational units supporting Cyber, Space, Missile Defense, and Combating WMO.

ICBM Centralized Asset Mana1ement (CAM)

FVlS Enhancement : $20.6M (AF O&M I SAG 11M I L-50)

Funding brings ICBM CAM funding in line with the rest ofthe Nuclear Enterprise. Funding improves

service's ability to procure spare parts, completes critical software I hardware upgrades and improves

contractor logistics support, technical orders and sustainment engineering efforts.

HIRh Pavoff Initiatives

Senior Leader Enterprise

FYlS Enhancement: $4S.OM (OW Procurement /l-17)

Funds critical enhancement for classified National Leadership Command Capability.

Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) Long-Ran1e Tracklns and Instrumentation RADAR

(ALTAIR) Enhancements

FYlS Enhancement: $6.0M (Army RDT&E I l-136)

Funds low risk effort to implement automation and signal processing upgrades to Reagan Test Site's

AlTAIR radar to allow a Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) Space Situational Awareness capability.