49
Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look

1

Page 2: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Developed more than 80 years ago as a tool to help democratize higher education access for all students, the SAT

® has grown to become the world’s most widely used college entrance exam.

The SAT continues to evolve and improve to meet the needs of a dynamic education landscape. However, the SAT has always served the primary mission of the College Board: to connect students to college opportunity and success.

History and Background

4

Page 3: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

A Measure of College Readiness

The SAT evaluates the cognitive tools necessary to succeed in college and beyond, including the ability to:

– Think critically

– Solve problems

– Communicate effectively

What is the SAT®

?

5

A Predictor of College Outcomes

Is a valid predictor of meaningful college outcomes on a student’s path to a college degree, including:

– Freshman Year GPA

– 2nd, 3rd and 4th year GPAs

– College Retention

Page 4: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

What’s On The Test…

The SAT® assesses the core academic skills necessary for college success and how students apply those skills.

6

44 multiple-choice items, 10 student-produced response items

Number & Operations, Algebra, Geometry, Data Analysis

25 minute essay, take sides on an accessible topic

49 multiple-choice grammar/usage questions

Essay sub-score 2-12

Short (paragraph) and long (up to 800 word) passages

48 questions, make inferences, draw conclusions

19 sentence completion questions

Critical Reading200 - 800

Mathematics200 - 800

Writing200 - 800

Page 5: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Every SAT® Knowledge and Skills Topic is represented in the Common Core State Standards

The knowledge and skills covered on the SAT are directly linked to what students are learning in the classroom

7

SAT Critical Reading Knowledge and Skills Topics

SAT Mathematics Knowledge and Skills Topics

SAT Writing Knowledge and Skills Topics

Number & Operations

Algebra & Functions

Geometry & Measurement

Data, Statistics & Probability

Problem Solving

Representation

Connections

Communication

Manage Word Choice and Grammatical Relationships Between Words

Manage Grammatical Structures Used to Modify or Compare

Manage Phrases and Clauses in a Sentence

Recognize Correctly Formed Sentences

Manage Order and Relationships of Sentences and Paragraphs

Determining the Meaning of Words

Author’s Craft

Reasoning and Inference

Organization and Ideas

Understanding Literary Elements

Source: Vasavada, N., Carman, E., Hart, B. Luisier, D.; Common Core State Standards Alignment: readiStep™, PSAT/NMSQT® and SAT; College Board, 2011

Page 6: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Students enrolled in a core curriculum perform better on the SAT®

Core curriculum is defined by at least four years of English, and at least three years of mathematics, three years of natural science, and three years of social science and history.

+48 points

+47 points

+48 points

Scor

e

Source: College-Bound Seniors 2011 Cohort Data8

SAT® Mean Scores by Curriculum

Students who take a core curriculum in high school perform better on the SAT and are better prepared for college than students who do not.

Page 7: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Students enrolled in rigorous courses perform stronger on the SAT ®

9

+59 points +46 points

+58 points

Scor

e

Source: College-Bound Seniors 2011 Cohort Data

SAT Mean Scores by AP or Honors English Participation

Students enrolled in AP ® or Honors English outperform the general SAT populations in all sections of the SAT.

Page 8: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Students enrolled in rigorous courses perform stronger on the SAT ®

Source: College-Bound Seniors 2011 Cohort Data10

+64 points

+76 points

+64 points

Scor

e

SAT Mean Scores by AP or Honors Math Participation

Students enrolled in AP ® or Honors Mathematics outperform the general SAT populations in all sections of the SAT.

Page 9: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

Grade Average for All Subjects* 3.10 3.20 3.28 3.33 3.34

High school grades are increasing over time

*Based on four-point system, where A=4.0Note: 1990 GPAs reflect both SAT Subject Test™ takers and SAT® takers. GPAs for 1995-2010 reflect SAT® takers only.

11

The need for a consistent national measure is more important than ever as high school grades have been increasing over time.

Percentage of Students by Self-Reported High School GPA

Page 10: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

West Ed Alignment | Summary of Findings

Competency SAT Alignment ACT Alignment

UC – Academic Literacy

Critical Reading: 90% Strong, 10% Implicit (B8)

Writing: 100% Strong (B8)

Essay: 3 standards aligned

Reading: 85% Strong, 13% Implicit, 2% None

English: 100% Strong

Essay: 3 standards aligned

UC – Mathematics

Mathematics: 85% Strong, 13% Partial, 2% Implicit Mathematics: 82% Strong, 12% Partial

CA – English Language Arts (Grades 9-10)

Critical Reading: 66% Strong, 34% None (B8)

Writing: 100% Strong (B8)

Essay: 5 standards aligned

Reading: 25% Strong, 8% Partial, 67% None

English: 100% Strong

Essay: 5 standards aligned

CA – English Language Arts (Grades 11-12)

Critical Reading: 37% Strong, 63% None (B1)

Writing: 98% Strong, 2% None (B1)

Essay: 5 standards aligned

Reading: 40% Strong, 60% None

English: 97% Strong, 3% None

Essay: 5 standards aligned

CA – Mathematics

Mathematics: 63% Strong, 35% Partial, 2% None

SAT II 3YBC: 82% Strong, 12% Partial, 6% None

Mathematics: 77% Strong, 22% Partial, 1% None

CA – Science SAT II Physics: 57% Strong, 23% Partial, 20% None

SAT II Chemistry: 58% Strong, 32% Partial, 10% None

SAT II Biology: 39% Strong, 17% Partial, 44% None

Science: 0% Strong, 3% Partial, 97% None

*All information taken from WestEd SAT/ACT Alignment Study

Page 11: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT® Participation

13

Page 12: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

More students are planning for college as evidenced by the increase in SAT ® participation

Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Report; WICHE (2008)14

1,534,4571,563,272 1,573,110

1,597,329

1,647,123

2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

% C

hang

e vs

. 200

7 Co

hort

US SAT TakersUS High School

Graduates

SAT Participation Relative to U.S. High School GraduatesSAT Participation by Cohort

The SAT reaches more students than ever before while the number of graduating high school seniors in the U.S. has decreased.

Page 13: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT® Is reaching more underserved students

2011 SAT Takers Beneficiaries of the SAT Fee-Waiver Program

545,010

533,731

507,782

483,842

487,113

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2011 SAT Takers Prospective First-Generation College Goers

15

351,068

309,289

269,015

230,080

198,729

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors

77% increase in SAT Fee-Waiver usage since 2007

Represents more than $37 million in fees and services

The SAT is reaching more low-income and first-generation students who are traditionally underserved in the college-going process.

Page 14: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® is the most diverse U.S. college entrance exam

Note: Due to rounding, percentages do not add up to 100.

Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors 16

11%

Asian

13%

Black

15%

Hispanic/Latino

4%

Other

53%

White

4%

No Response

1%

American Indian

2011 College-Bound Seniors by Race/Ethnicity

43% of SAT takers report an ethnic or racial background other than Caucasian

Page 15: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Minority SAT ® takers are increasing at a faster rate than U.S. public high school grads

17

The growth rate of SAT takers is highest for racial and ethnic minority sub-groups

Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Report; WICHE (2008)

Page 16: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT® reflects the diversity of the nation’s classrooms

US Public SchoolSAT Takers

US Public SchoolGraduates

84% of SAT Takers report attending public school

18Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors Total Group Report; WICHE (2008)

SAT participation closely reflects the distribution of minority students graduating from U.S. public schools.

Page 17: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

19

Page 18: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT ® Validity

20

Page 19: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Why is Predictive Validity important?

Predictive Validity refers to the ability of a factor (e.g. test scores) to predict future performance.

Predictive Validity refers to the ability of a factor (e.g. test scores) to predict future performance.

For colleges and universities, it is important to understand how well factors used for college admissions or placement predict desired academic outcomes

– Factors (predictors) - typically include high school grades, SAT ® scores or class rank

– Academic Outcomes – GPA, retention, course grades

The measurement of how well predictors do is usually expressed as a correlation (from +1.0 to -1.0)

Page 20: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

22

National SAT ® Validity Study

Cross-institutional, longitudinal validity and higher education research informing ways to ensure that students are ready for and successful in college.

* College Board Research and Development Database, 2007 Cohort

National SAT Validity Study*

Data supplied by four-year institutions from around the U.S. and matched to College Board data.

•110 institutions•216,081 students

Broad institutional characteristics•Size•Public/Private•Geographic distribution•Selectivity

Page 21: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® is a strong predictor of first year college performance

Correlation* of SAT® and High School GPA to First-Year College

GPA

Each section is a valid and strong predictor of college performance

* Correlations corrected for restriction of rangeSource: Patterson, B.; Mattern, K.; Kobrin, J.; Validity of the SAT for Predicting FYGPA: 2007 SAT Validity

Sample; College Board, 2011 23

The combined SAT predicts as well as high school GPA

The SAT in combination with HSGPA is the best predictor of college performance

The SAT continues to predict just as well as high school grades. When used together, grades and SAT scores are the best predictors of college performance

Page 22: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

What does a correlation of .56 mean?

The SAT® provides a meaningful prediction of how students will perform in their first year of college.

8%18%

33%

54%

74%

89%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

600-890 900-1190 1200-1490 1500-1790 1800-2090 2100-2400

% E

arni

ng B

or

high

er

Freshman GPA of B or Higher

SAT Scores: Mathematics + Critical Reading + Writing

24Source: Patterson, B.; Mattern, K.; Kobrin, J.; Validity of the SAT for Predicting FYGPA: 2007 SAT Validity

Sample; College Board, 2011

Page 23: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Other Correlation Examples for Context

Variable 1 Variable 2 Correlation Sugar Consumption

Child’s Behavior .00

Aspirin Heart Attack Death .02

Lead Exposure Child IQ .12

Parental Divorce Child Well-Being .09

Ibuprofen Pain Reduction .14

Alcohol Aggressive Behavior

.23

Viagra Sexual Functioning .38

Gender Height .67

SAT (CR, M, W

) with

FYGPA ≈ .56

From: Meyer, G., et. al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165.

Page 24: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT ® Scores Still Matter, Even AfterControlling for High School GPA

27

Mean FYGPA by SAT Score Band, Controlling for HSGPA

SAT 600 - 890 900 - 1190 1200 - 14901500 - 1790 1800 - 2090 2100 - 2400

2.79

3.09

3.34

3.56

2.22

2.522.51

2.74

2.94

3.15

1.98

2.262.12

2.27

2.472.54

1.81

1.98

FYG

PA

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

HSGPAC or Lower B A

Page 25: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT® continues to predict college outcomes through students’ 2nd and 3rd years

The relationship between SAT scores and cumulative GPA remains strong and consistent as students progress through their college career.

28

Percent of Students Earning a 2nd Yr and 3rd Yr Cum GPA of a B or Higher by SAT Score Band

Source: Patterson, B.; Mattern, K.; Kobrin, J.; Validity of the SAT for Predicting Second-Year Grades: 2006 SAT Validity Sample; College Board, 2011; Patterson, B.; Mattern, K.; Kobrin, J.; Validity of the SAT for Predicting Third-Year Grades: 2006 SAT Validity Sample; College Board, 2011;

Page 26: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT® continues to predict college persistence

29

College Retention Rates by SAT Score Band

Page 27: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® provides incremental validity over HSGPA in predicting college retention

Once again we see that the SAT in combination with High School grades provides a greater understanding of how students might perform

31

Incremental Validity of SAT Scores over HSGPA for Predicting Second Year Retention

Source: Patterson, B.; Mattern, K.; The Relationship between SAT Scores and Retention to the Second Year: 2007 SAT Validity Sample; College Board, 2011

Page 28: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® helps predict four-year graduation rates

32

Rates by score band with continuous enrollment at original institution

Page 29: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® provides incremental validity over HSGPA in predicting four-year graduation rates

33

Four-Year Graduation Rates by SAT Scores, holding HSGPA constant

Page 30: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

External validity studies confirm the value and validity of the SAT ®

34Sources: University of Minnesota - (Sackett, Kuncel, Arneson, Waters, and Cooper, 2009); University of Georgia (Cornwell, Mustard, and Parys, 2008); University of

California (Agronow, 2007)

Page 31: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT ® Fairness

35

Page 32: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT ® score performance does vary by sub-group

The existence of score gaps amongst different groups does not necessarily indicate that the assessment is unfair or biased.

36Source: 2011 College-Bound Seniors

Page 33: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The achievement gap exists among many measures of academic achievement and attainment

37

Sources: 2011 College-Bound Seniors; U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, High School Transcript Study (HSTS), various years, 1990–2009. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, 2009; U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey (ACS)

% - Percent of population age 18-24 with a high school credential, 2006

Average CR+M+W

Average GPA

Academic Achievement Academic Attainment

% National six-year graduation rates of bachelor's degree-seeking students, 2007

Unfortunately, inequities in American society and education exist as evidenced by multiple academic measures

Page 34: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

TESTAfrican

AmericansAsian

AmericansHispanics Caucasia

ns

SAT Verbal 434 498 456 526

SAT Math 426 526 460 528

ACT Composite 17.1 21.8 18.9 21.7

GRE Verbal 391 487 438 495

GRE Quant 416 598 482 540

GMAT 416 533 492 531

LSAT 142.7 152.7 145.2 153.5

Achievement gaps persist beyond undergraduate studies

Page 35: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

– Regular Curriculum Surveys

• Ensure the content on the SAT aligns with what is taught in high school and what colleges expect entering freshman to know and understand

– Test Development Committees

• Comprised of high school and college faculty review all test items and test forms

– Pre-Test (variable section)

• Field tests new items to collect statistics about item performance, ensure fairness for students of all backgrounds and that students of equal ability perform the same

– Rigorous Psychometric Analysis

• Evaluates the performance of each item to validate that items are performing as expected

The SAT ® is rigorously developed and researched to ensure fairness

The SAT® is the most rigorously researched and designed standardized test in the world.

39

Every question is field-tested across the entire testing population •All 50 U.S. states•Over 170 countriesevery question goes through a sensitivity review to avoid concerns with:•Gender•Ethnicity/Race•Disabilities•Controversial topics like war, violence and politics

Page 36: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Gardens in one form or another has been planted, tended, and harvested since antiquity by people from a wide variety of cultures. No error.

Easier/more difficult for which gender or racial/ethnic group(s), matched on total score?

Eliminating Questions that Behave Differently for Groups of Students

40

African Americans – more difficult

Asian Americans – more difficult

Page 37: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The SAT ® holds as a valid predictor of college performance by all sub-groups

41

Correlation* of SAT® and High School GPA to First-Year College GPA by Race/Ethnicity

When we evaluate the predictive validity of the SAT by racial/ethnic sub-groups we see that SAT continues to be a strong and valid predictor of college performance, in most cases even more so than high school GPA

RACE/ETHNICITY SAT (CR+M+W)

HSGPA SAT+HSGPA

American Indian .54 .49 .63

Asian American .48 .47 .56

African American .47 .44 .54

Hispanic .50 .46 .57

White .53 .56 .63

Total .56 .56 .64

The SAT in combination with HSGPA remains the best predictor of college performance across all sub-groups

Page 38: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Extensive external research confirms that the SAT ® is not biased

42

There is a substantial body of literature indicating that individual

item bias has been largely mitigated in today’s admission test due to extensive external research and development of question items

on both the SAT and ACT®.

-NACAC Testing Commission Report-September 2008

Page 39: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Interpreting and Comparing Scores

43

Page 40: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

• Each section score is reported on a 200- to 800- point scale, each section is an independently valid predictor of college success.

• The Writing sub-score is a combination of a multiple-choice score from 20-80 (70%) and an essay score from 2 to 12 (30%)

• Each essay is independently graded by two qualified readers

• The SAT is designed so that a student who answers about half of the questions correctly will receive an average score of approximately 500.

• Scores on any standardized assessment are approximations rather than precise measures of skill. The standard error of measure (SEM) of the SAT usually falls in a range of 30 points for reading and mathematics and 40 points for writing above or below a student’s true skill level.

• When comparing scores there must be a difference of 50-60 points before more skill can be assumed in one area than another.

Interpreting SAT Scores

44

Page 41: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Comparing SAT ® and ACT ® scores

45

•The ACT and SAT are scored on different scales

•The concordance table provides a way for individuals and institutions to compare a student’s performance on one exam with their likely performance on a second exam

•Comparing percentiles is not accurate because the pools of students taking the two tests are different

Note: The concordance table is based on scores from over 300k students who took both versions of the tests with writing from the Class of 2006

Page 42: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

The population of students taking the SAT® perform better than the population taking the ACT ® across all sub-groups

To compare the performance of students or populations of students you should concord an ACT score to the SAT scale

46

2011 National Composite ACT Scores

Concorded 2011 ACT Scores to

SAT CR+M Scale

2011 National Combined SAT CR+M

Total 21.1 994 1011

American Indian 18.6 894 972

Asian 23.6 1094 1112

Black 17 830 855

Hispanic 18.7 898 914

White 22.4 1046 1063

Sources: 2011 College Bound Seniors; ACT: Condition of College and Career Readiness, 2011

Page 43: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Resources – For Students

47

Page 44: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT Practice Tools At a Glance for Students

5

Practicing for the SAT and SAT Subject Tests Planning for Test Day

SAT Question of the Day – FREE

SAT Question of the Day Mobile App – FREE

SAT Practice Questions – FREE

SAT Subject Test Practice Questions – FREE

SAT Practice Test – FREE

Mathematics Review – FREE

Effective Writing Review – FREE

SAT® Skills Insight™ – FREE

The SAT® Practice Booklet – FREE

Official SAT Study Guide™: 2nd Ed.

Official SAT Subject Test Study Guide™: 2nd Ed.

The Official SAT Online Course™

My SAT Study Plan™ – FREE

Answers Imagined – FREE

SAT Test Taking Approaches – FREE

SAT Essay Strategies – FREE

SAT Subject Test Taking

Approaches – FREE

SAT Subject Test Recommended Skills

and Prerequisites – FREE

SAT Subject Test Web Resources – FREEExpanded Practice QuestionsAnswer ExplanationsRecommended Preparation

Important Test Day information on:

How to Do Your Best

What to Bring

Standby Testing

If You’re Absent

SAT Test Center Closing

Make-up Testing

Test Security and Fairness

Helping Students Get Ready

Models, Lesson Plans, and Strategies for:Argumentative writing skillsSchool-based SAT PracticeThe Official SAT Teacher’s Guide™ESL/ELL students

Professional Development Workshops:SAT Skills InsightAnimating Student Writing Holistic Scoring Workshop School-Based SAT PracticeWriting Preparation for Educators of ESL/ELL Students

Most SAT Practice Tools are FREE!

Page 45: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

49

SAT Skills Insight

• SAT Skills Insight identifies the academic skills that typical students should focus on to improve their scores, depending on their target score range

• Free, online resource, paired with My SAT Online Score Report to make SAT In Focus

• Sample SAT questions and answers help students better understand the skill descriptions given

Page 46: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

SAT® Offers the Most Generous Fee Waiver Program of Any College Entrance Exam

More than 360,000 low-income students in the graduating class of 2011 benefitted from SAT Fee Waivers (1 in 5)

More than $35 million in services made available at no cost to low-income high school students last academic year

Eligible students can receive:

Two SAT fee waivers and two SAT Subject Tests™ fee waivers (up to six Subject Tests)

Four Free Additional Flexible Score Reports

Free Question and Answer Service or Student Answer Service

Four Request for Waiver of College Application Fee forms

Discount on The Official SAT Online Course™

Page 47: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

Resources – For Institutions

51

Page 48: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

There are many factors that colleges and universities use to assess students today, but the SAT remains a key component, along with high school grades and a rigorous curriculum.

The SAT:– Provides a national yardstick to compare students across the country

• High schools vary widely in courses, teachers and grading practices

• Grade inflation is more common than ever

– Is a strong predictor of college success and retention• As good as high school grades at predicting student performance in the first,

second and even third years of college

• Gives students a better sense, based on their scores, of how ready they are academically for the rigors of college

The Importance of the SAT® for Institutions

52

Page 49: Understanding Standardized Testing: A Deeper Look 1

To assist colleges and universities in conducting research about their students, the College Board offers the Admitted Class Evaluation Service (ACES™), a free online service that predicts how admitted students will likely perform at your institution and how successful they can be in specific classes.

ACES placement validity studies predict how students will perform on different academic measures by comparing student performance in selected courses with student scores on various College Board assessments*.

Admitted Class Evaluation Service™

* SAT ®, SAT Subject Tests™, ACCUPLACER® tests, AP ® Exams and CLEP ® exams

ACES admission validity studies identify which measures best predict a student’s future performance and recommends the best combination of predictors for your institution.

53