17
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2

Understanding Meaningful Use

  • Upload
    milton

  • View
    48

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Understanding Meaningful Use. Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2. Purdue Research Foundation 2012. Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012. Meaningful Use. Purdue Research Foundation 2012. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding Meaningful Use

Understanding Meaningful Use

Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHESDecember 7, 2012

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2

Page 2: Understanding Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use• Financial incentives for the “meaningful use”

of certified EHR technology to improve patient care

• Providers have to meet thresholds for certain objectives– Required core objectives– Choice of menu objectives

• Meaningful use must be demonstrated for all patients, not just Medicare or Medicaid subscribers

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 3: Understanding Meaningful Use

Stage 1 Capture Information

Stage 2 Report and Exchange Information

Stage 3 and Beyond…Leverage Information for Improved Patient Care

Meaningful Use Stages

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 4: Understanding Meaningful Use

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 5: Understanding Meaningful Use

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 6: Understanding Meaningful Use

Improving quality, safety, efficiency and

reducing health

disparities(cont.)

Maintain active medication allergy list 80%+ of patients

Record and chart changes in selected vital signs (height, weight, BP, BMI, growth charts (2-20 yrs.)

50%+ of patients

Record smoking status for patients 13 years old or older

50%+ of patients

Implement one clinical decision support rule along with the ability to track compliance that rule

1 rule

Report ambulatory quality measures to CMS or the States

Aggregate numerator/

denominator

Policy Priority Stage 1 Objectives Measure

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 7: Understanding Meaningful Use

Engage patients and families in their healthcare

Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information (including diagnostic test results, problem list, medication lists, and medication allergies) upon request, within 3 days of request

50%+ of all patients who

request

Provide clinical summaries to patients for each office visit within 3 days of visit

50%+ of all office visits

Improve Care Coordination

Capability to exchange key clinical information (for example problem list, medication lists, medication allergies, diagnostic test results) among providers of care and patient authorized entities electronically

1 test of capability

Ensure adequate security and

privacy provisions for

personal health information

Protect electronic health information created or maintained by certified EHR technology through the implementation of appropriate technical capabilities.

Conduct or review a

security risk analysis

Policy Priority Stage 1 Objectives Measure

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 8: Understanding Meaningful Use

Security

Providers fined $100,00 for Internet privacy violations

o 2 physician cardiology practice

The physician practice was posting clinical and surgical appointments for its patients on an Internet-based calendar that was publicly accessible

OCR findings: Few policies and procedures to comply with the HIPAA Privacy and

Security Rules Limited safeguards in place to protect ePHI

Outcome: $100,000 penalty Required to adopt a Corrective Action Plan

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 9: Understanding Meaningful Use

SecurityMassachusetts provider settles HIPAA

case for $1.5 milliono 300 Physician Eye and Ear Institute

Result of a theft of an unencrypted personal laptop containing ePHI of patients and research subjects

OCR findings: No thorough analysis of the risk to the confidentiality of ePHI

maintained on portable devices Did not Implement security measures sufficient to ensure the

confidentiality of ePHI Did not implement policies and procedures to restrict access to

ePHI to authorized users of portable devices Outcome:

$1.5 million penalty Required to adopt a Corrective Action Plan

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 10: Understanding Meaningful Use

Menu SetPolicy

Priority

Stage 1 Objectives Measure

Improving quality, safety,

efficiency and reducing

health disparities

Implement drug formularychecks

Functionality enabled

Incorporate clinical lab test results into certifiedEHR technology as structured data

40%+ of all clinical lab tests

ordered

Generate lists of patients by specific conditions to

use for quality improvement, reduction of disparities, research or outreach

At least 1 report of patients with

condition

Send reminders to patients 65 years or older of 5 years or younger per patient preference for preventive/ follow up care

20%+ of patients

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 11: Understanding Meaningful Use

Policy Priority

Stage 1 Objectives Measure

Engage patients and families in

their healthcare

Improve Care Coordination

Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information (including lab results, problem list,

medication lists, medication allergies) within four business days of the information being available to the EP

10%+ of patients

Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific

education resources and provide those resources to the patient if appropriate

10%+ of patients

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 12: Understanding Meaningful Use

Improve carecoordination

Perform Medication Reconciliation when the EP or eligible hospital receives a patient from another setting of care or provider of care

50%+ of care transitions to

EP

Provide summary of care record for each transition of a patient to another setting of care or provider of care or referral to another provider of care

50%+ of care transitions from EP

Improve population

health

Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registriesor Immunization Information Systems and actual submission in accordance with applicable law and practice

At least 1 test

Capability to submit electronic syndromic surveillance data topublic health agencies and actual submission in accordance with applicable law and practice

At least 1 test

Policy Priority

Stage 1 Objectives Measure

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 13: Understanding Meaningful Use

Progress to Date• Incentives according to CMS:

– More than 110,000 Eligible Professionals have received incentive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

– From May 2011 to July 31, 2012, more than $3.6 billion in Medicare payments

– From January 2011 to August 31, 2012, more than $3.3 billion in Medicaid payments

• Release of Stage 2 Meaningful Use– Begins 2014

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 14: Understanding Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use: Stage 2• Secure Messaging (Core)

– Use secure electronic messaging to communicate with patients on relevant health information

– Threshold: greater than 5%– 2 exclusions apply

• Timely Online Access: View, Transmit or Download (Core)

– 2 portions, must achieve both for Meaningful Use– Timely Online Access

• Measure: Provide patients the ability to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 4 business days of the information being available to the EP or 36 hours after discharge from an inpatient or emergency department of an EH or CAH

• Threshold: greater than 50%– View Transmit or Download

• Measure: Number of unique patients seen by the EP during the reporting period (or authorized representative), who view, download, or transmit health information.

• Threshold: greater than 5%– 1 exclusion applies to each portion

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 15: Understanding Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use: Stage 2• Imaging Results (Menu)

– Imaging results consisting of the image itself and any explanation or other accompanying information are accessible through CEHRT.

– Threshold: The resulting percentage must be more than 10 percent in order to meet this measure.

– 2 exclusions apply

• Family History (Menu)– More than 20% of all unique patients seen by the EP during

the EHR reporting periods have a structured data entry for one or more first-degree relatives

– 1 exclusion applies

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 16: Understanding Meaningful Use

Meaningful Use: Stage 2• Cancer Registry (Menu)

– Successful ongoing submission of cancer case information from CEHRT to a public health central cancer registry for the entire EHR reporting period.

– No threshold, pass/fail– 4 exclusions apply

• Specialized Registry (Menu)– Successful ongoing submission of specific case information

from CEHRT to a specialized registry for the entire EHR reporting period

– No threshold, pass/fail– 4 exclusions apply

Purdue Research Foundation 2012

Page 17: Understanding Meaningful Use

Summary

• Meaningful Use is here to stay• Advanced stages become more

challenging• Resources are available

– Allison Bryan• 765-496-9791• [email protected]

Purdue Research Foundation 2012