Umesh Prajapati Final

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    1/29

    , &O R M U L A T I O N D E V E L O P M E N T E V A L U T I O N O F&O R M U L A T I O N D E V E L O P M E N T E V A L U T I O N O F X T E N D E D R E L E A S E T A B L E T O F A N T I E P I L E P T I C X T E N D E D R E L E A S E T A B L E T O F A N T I E P I L E P T I C

    R U GR U G

    Guided By.M r sha ilesh S h arm a

    . ( )M Pharm G u idePresented by

    .M r U m eshPra ja p a ti

    .M Pharam( )P Ceutics

    Department of Pharmaceutics, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, JAIPUR

    o n e o n ea tt .Y D U S C A D IL A H E LT H C A R E LT D

    Industrial Guide :( -M s A rtiPo td a r C o

    )g u id e

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    2/29

    INDEX

    1. Objective

    2. Drug and Excipients

    3. Formulation, Development &

    Evaluation

    4. Stability study5. Conclusion

    1.

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    3/29

    1.O BJ EC T I V E

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    4/29

    OBJECTIVE To formulate stable, effective and optimum Extended

    release dosage form

    To study the effect of different excipients in theformulation.

    To evaluate the prepared Extended release dosage forms.

    To perform the stability studies.

    In this work effect of polymer will be observed ondrug release .

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    5/29

    2. DRUG AND EXCIPIENT

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    6/29

    DRUG AND EXCIPIENTSAPI1. Category Anti-epileptic

    2. Mol. mass 250.294 g/mol

    3. Boiling point 697.3 C

    4. Melt. Point 142 - 146 C

    5. Solubility BCS class-I, Highly soluble

    6. Description A white to Off-white to powder

    7. Metabolism Hepatic

    8. Half life 13 hours

    9. Time to peak plasma 4 hrs

    10. Route Oral, IV

    11. BCS class I

    12. Excretion 40% as conjugated metabolite inurine

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    7/29

    ExcipientsIngredients Function

    AED API

    Lactose monohydrate Diluent

    Hydroxypropaylmethaylcellulose(HPMC K100 M) Matrix-forming polymer

    Hydroxypropaylmethaylcellulose (HPMC K4M) Matrix-forming polymer

    Hydroxypropaylmethaylcellulose (HPMC K15M) Matrix-forming polymer

    Isopropaylalcohol (IPA) Binder solution

    Microcrystalline cellulose(MCC) Diluent

    Colloidal silicon dioxide Glidant (0.25-3%)

    Talc Glidant

    Magnesium stearate Lubricant (0.25-4%)

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    8/29

    3 .PREF ORM U LA T I O N

    3 .PREFO RM U LA T I O N

    S T U D Y S T U D Y

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    9/29

    Drug- Excipient Compatibility StudySr. No. Ingredients

    Ratio of Drymix Drug:Excipient

    Initial 1 week 2week 3 week 4 week

    1 API -- Whitecrystalline

    powder

    No change No change No change No change

    2 LACTOSEMONOHYDRETE

    1:1 Whitecrystalline

    powder

    No change No change No change No change

    3 HPMC K4M 1:1 Whitecrystalline

    powder

    No change No change No change No change

    4HPMCK100M

    1:1 Whitecrystalline

    powder

    No change No change No change No change

    5 HPMCK15M

    1:1 Whitecrystalline

    powder

    No change No change No change No change

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    10/29

    6Microcrystallinecellulose(MCC) 1:1

    White crystalline powder

    No change No change No change No change

    7 Colloidalsilicondioxide

    1:1 White crystalline powder

    No change No change No change No change

    8 TALC 1:1 White crystalline powder

    No change No change No change No change

    9 Magnesiumstearate

    1:1 White crystalline powder

    No change No change No change No change

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    11/29

    PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF API

    Result of preformulation study of APIDrug Angle of

    repose(0)

    Loose bulk density(g/ml)

    Tapped bulk density(g/ml)

    Carrsindex(%)

    Hausner'sratio

    API 22.22 0.35 0.49 39.45 1.40

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    12/29

    Description: A white to off-white powder

    Related substances: Unknown Impurities: :NOT MORE THAN 0.1%Total Impurities: NOT MORE THAN 0.5%

    Assay by HPLC 99.87%

    Loss of drying 0.67% (Not more than 1.0%)

    Melting point 142~146c

    Half life: 13 hour

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    13/29

    Particle size analysis

    ( By Malvern master seizer, dry method)

    For many active substances, particle size has an impact on powder flow; content

    uniformity and drug dissolution. In order to assure consistent product quality, the particle size of the API has been characterized. From the results obtained, the limits

    will be derived which will be routinely applied by the API manufacturer during

    analysis of drug.

    Particle size of drug was determined by Malvern particle size analyzer.

    D (0.10) = 2.39 , D (0.50) = 7.37 , D (0.90) = 19.46 .

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    14/29

    Theoretical Release profile InVitro Release study of Theoretical and Hypothetical Release profile

    Dissolution 900ml, USP - II (Paddle) Apparatus, 50 RPM

    Time (hrs.) Theoretical % Drug Release Hypothetical % Drug Release

    0.1N HCL

    1 23.9 15-25%

    2 36 30-35%

    PH6.8 Phosphate buffer

    4 53.5 50-55%

    8 89.6 85-90%

    12 97.6 NLT 90%

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    15/29

    4.4. METHODOLOGYMETHODOLOGY

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    16/29

    Sr.no Ingredient F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7

    1 API 300 300 300 300 300 300 300

    2 Lactose

    mono hydrete

    177 177 169.5 162 162 162 162

    3 HPMC K4M - - - - 10 20 30

    4 HPMCK15M

    40 - - - - - -

    5 HPMCK100M

    - 40 50 60 50 40 30

    6 IPA Q.S. Q.S. Q.S. Q.S. Q.S. Q.S. Q.S.

    7 MCC 59 59 56.5 54 54 54 54

    8 Colloidalsiliconedioxide

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    9 TALC 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

    10 Mg.sterate 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    TOTAL 600 600 600 600 600 600 600

    Formulation compositions of AED

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    17/29

    Evaluation of blend Result of evaluation of powder blend of trial batches F/1 to F/7

    Trails Angle of repose ()

    Bulk density(g/ml)

    Tappeddensity(g/ml)

    Carrs index(%) Hausners ratio

    F/1 24.69 0.462 0.524 11.83 1.13

    F/2 23.31 0.438 0.517 15.28 1.18

    F/3 24.31 0.431 0.504 14.48 1.17

    F/4 25.14 0.459 0.534 14.04 1.16

    F/5 23.31 0.459 0.534 14.48 1.18

    F/6 24.31 0.456 0.529 15.28 1.18

    F/7 24.31 0.456 0.529 14.48 1.17

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    18/29

    Evaluation Of Tablet Result of evaluation of tablets of trial batches F/1 to F/7

    Trial batchesHardness (kP)

    Thickness(mm) Friability (%) Avg. Wt.

    (mg)

    Assay (%)

    F1 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 98.80

    F2 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 97.5

    F3 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 97.6

    F4 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 98.7

    F5 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 97.8

    F6 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 98.4

    F7 16-17 5.41-5.42 Nil 600 94.3

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    19/29

    5 . DRU G RELEA S E PRO F I LE

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    20/29

    Drug release profile of trail F/1 to F/7

    Time (hrs.) F/1 F/2 F/3 F/4F/5 F/6 F/7

    0.1N HCL

    1 62.2 60.8 55.4 49.436.6 25.9 23.9

    2 85.8 64.2 63.8 45.844.2 39.1 35.9

    PH6.8phosphete buffer

    4 98.7 87.6 79.8 69.955.6 58.9 53.4

    8 97.2 97 98.4 9969.8 92.1 89.7

    12 95.1 96.9 96.5 98.381.9 89.4 97.4

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    21/29

    Time

    Dissolution data of drug release F1 to F3 Dissolution data of drug release F4 to F7

    Dissolution Parameter : :Dissolution Media . / .0 1N HCL PH6 8Phosphet Buffer :Temperature 37+ 2 C :Volume of Medium 900ml :Sample Drawn 10 ml :Apparatus Basket . . .:R P M 100 :Dilution 5ml in 100ml

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    22/29

    6.STABILITY STUDY

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    23/29

    STABILITY STUDY Tablets was packed in a blister formed by the following primary packaging components.

    Base foil: PVC/PVDC blister pack.

    Lidding Material : 0.025 mm aluminum foil

    Justification: PVC/PVDC Blister pack provides complete protection

    against

    light, water vapour, gases etc.

    The ICH Guidelines have established that long term stability testing should be done at

    25C2C / 60%5% RH; stress testing should be done at 40C2C / 75%5% RH for 6

    months

    l f b l b h f h

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    24/29

    Evaluation parameters of stability batch after 1 months

    FormulationCode

    Parameters Storage time

    0 month 1 month

    Drug content,%

    101.34

    100.24

    Physicalappearance

    No discolor- ation No discolor-ation

    Comparison of dissolution of optimized tablet (F07) of initial and after 1 months

    Time(min) Initial After 1months

    1 23.9 23.32 35.9 32.2

    4 53.4 50.0

    8 89.7 85.01

    12 97.4 95

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    25/29

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    26/29

    7.CONCLUSION

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    27/29

    CONCLUSION The study was undertaken with the aim to Formulation and

    evaluation of Antiepileptic extended release tablet using

    HPMC grade of polymer as retarding agent. From the

    above results and discussion, it is concluded that theformulation of extended release tablet of Antiepileptic

    drug containing HPMC K100+HPMC K4M, which are taken

    as ideal or optimized formulation of extended release

    tablet for 12 hours release as it fulfils all the requirementof extended release tablet and study encourages further

    clinical trials and long term stability study on this

    formulation

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    28/29

    References Chien YW, 1992,. Novel drug delivery systems, 2nd Edition; Marcel Dekker

    Inc: New York, 139-40. Jantzen GM, Robinson JR, 1996, Sustained- and controlled-release drug

    delivery systems. In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT, editors. Modern pharmaceutics. 3 rd Ed.; Marcel Dekker Inc; New York; 575-609.

    Lachman L, Lieberman HA, Kanig JL., 1987, The theory and practice of industrial pharmacy, 3 rd Ed.; Varghese Publishing House Bombay, 293-345,430.

    Hui HW, Robinson JR, Lee VHL. Design and fabrication of oral controlledrelease drug delivery systems. In: Robinson JR, Lee V, editors. Controlleddrug delivery fundamentals and applications. 2 nd Ed.; Marcel Dekker: NewYork: Inc; p. 373-4..

    Ben-Menachem, E. Lacosamide: an investigational drug foradjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. Drugs of Today2007; 43 Available at: www.prous.com/journals

    ICH GUIDELINES Q1A (R2), Guidance for industry, stabilitytesting of new drug substance and products (Available on:http:// http://www.ich.org).

    The Indian Pharmacopoeia; Ministry of Health and FamilyWelfare Government of India Controller of Publications New

  • 8/6/2019 Umesh Prajapati Final

    29/29