Upload
halden
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance. Joe Foster, Manchester University 04 Jan 2005 All results compiled in time for Christmas…. Last year I …. Was responsible for quality assurance on all UK SCT endcap modules. Helped refine module acceptance criteria. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
UK ATLAS SCT Module Quality Assurance
Joe Foster, Manchester University
04 Jan 2005All results compiled in time for Christmas…
Last year I …
• Was responsible for quality assurance on all UK SCT endcap modules.
• Helped refine module acceptance criteria.• Ran web pages of current UK module statistics.• Examined and evaluated detailed test histories of 364
modules. • Chased missing test result, hidden problems,
database funnies, unexplained failures, etc.• Was an officially sanctioned grumpy old man.
Next Year I’ll…
• Carry on with UK endcap module QA.• Examine another 250 or so module test histories in
detail.• Further refine acceptance criteria to ensure we have
enough modules of the right sort.• Maybe move to integration of SCT in ATLAS.• Do some e-Science.• Increase my rating to ‘grouch’?
Aims of Module QA
• Monitor each step of module production.• Continuous health check on each module.• Monitor overall production rates, yields, etc.• Provide complete history of each module.• Select the best modules for assembly in SCT.• Pass module parameters on to reconstruction and
simulation.
Module QA Tools
• Production Database:– Current location and status of every SCT component.– Complete test history of of each component.– Shipping history of each component.– Complete assembly ‘family tree’.– Accessible world wide.
• Module ‘traveler’ and visual inspection sheets.• Locally archived test results.• Scanned images of assembled modules.• Personal notes from meetings, emails, etc.
UK Module Production Rates
UK Modules Started
Yield of Good + Pass UK Modules
Leakage Current, All UK Modules
RC Defects, All UK Modules
Noise Occupancy, All UK Modules
Midyf, All UK Modules
Midyf vs Midxf, All UK Modules
Msy vs. Mhy
Zmax, Zmin Front, All UK Modules
Zmax, Zmin Back, All UK Modules
Zminf vs. Zminb, All UK Modules
Time to Complete UK Module Testing
Failure ModesFailure Mode Outers Middles Inners
Broken bits 7 2 0
IV 5 1 0
No HV bias 1 1 0
RC defects 7 0 1
Noise Occupancy
2 1 0
Trim (1) 0 0
XY survey 4 1 5
Z survey 2 0 0
Misc. 1 0 0
UK XY/Z Survey Parameters out of Spec.
Parameter Pass Outside Pass
Mhy 4 1
Msx 0 1
Msy 3 0
Midyf 8 4
Sepf 0 1
Sepb 0 3
Zminf 9 0
Zminb 3 0
Zmaxf 1 0
Recoverable Modules
Rework Modules
Redefine ‘Pass’ 20220240100158, 208, 211, 365, 407(?)
Repair Bonds 20220240100043, 144, 381(?), 392(?)
Replace Chip 20220240100082, 083, 095, 195, 210, 237, 402
Others 20220240100119, 320(?)
Could recover ~5 modules by extending Pass spec.Up to 7 could be recovered by chip replacement.
Module Summary
Type StartsUnder
Test, OKEval
Good + Pass
Yield
Outer 250 16 231 204 0.88
Long
Middle123 1 122 116 0.95
Inner 79 61 10 8 0.80
Four inners fail ‘pass’ cuts due to jig teething problems.
Conclusions
• Good module QA information.• Good QA information on production processes.• UK should meet commitments on number and quality
of modules.