UFC/USADA Anti Doping Policy Article 10 Anti-Doping Policy consists of sport rules governing the conditions under which UFC sport is conducted. It is distinct in nature from criminal

  • View
    214

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Text of UFC/USADA Anti Doping Policy Article 10 Anti-Doping Policy consists of sport rules governing the...

  • Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC)

    ANTI-DOPING POLICY

    July 2015

    UFC Anti-Doping Policy Version 1 (July 2015) 1

  • PROGRAM OBJECTIVES

    This Policy is a central part of UFCs expanded efforts to protect the health and safety of its Athletes, and also to protect their right to compete on a level playing field. UFCs goal for this Policy is to be the best anti-doping program in all of professional sport. This Anti-Doping Policy is modeled on the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code) and, except as provided otherwise herein, should be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with the Code. This Anti-Doping Policy consists of sport rules governing the conditions under which UFC sport is conducted. It is distinct in nature from criminal and civil laws, and is not intended to be subject to or limited by any national requirements and legal standards applicable to criminal or civil proceedings. When reviewing the facts and the law of any given case, all judicial or other adjudicating bodies should be aware of and respect the distinct nature of this Anti-Doping Policy and the fact that the Code upon which it is based represents the consensus of a broad spectrum of stakeholders around the world as to what is necessary to protect and ensure fair sport. UFC may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and authority under this Program to the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), other Anti-Doping Organizations, or other third-party providers of anti-doping services. References to UFC in this Program shall include USADA, other Anti-Doping Organizations, or third-party anti-doping service providers to which UFC has made a delegation.

    SCOPE AND APPLICATION OF THE POLICY

    This Anti-Doping Policy shall apply to UFC and its officials, employees and independent contractors, and each participant in a UFC Bout. It also applies to the following: Athletes, Athlete Support Personnel, and other Persons, each of whom is deemed, as a condition of his/her contract with UFC, license with any Athletic Commission, accreditation and/or participation in a UFC Bout or by the preparation of Athletes for participation in any UFC Bout, to have agreed to be bound by this Anti-Doping Policy, and to have submitted to the authority of UFC and USADA to enforce this Anti-Doping Policy and to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the hearing panel specified in Article 8 to hear and determine cases brought under this Anti-Doping Policy. More specifically, this Anti-Doping Policy shall apply to: A. All Athletes under contract with UFC from the date of their first contract until the earlier of the termination of their contract with UFC or such time as they give notice to UFC in writing of their retirement from competition; and B. All Athlete Support Personnel who: participate in any UFC Bout in any capacity, including without limitation as a manager, coach, trainer, second, corner man, agent, official, medical or paramedical personnel, or who have been identified by an Athlete to UFC or USADA as an Athlete Support Person.

    UFC Anti-Doping Policy Version 1 (July 2015) 2

  • Any Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel, or other Person who commits an Anti-Doping Policy Violation while subject to this Policy shall remain subject to this Policy for purposes of results management and discipline after the relationship which originally gave rise to UFCs or USADAs authority has ceased.

    ARTICLE 1 DEFINITION OF DOPING

    Doping is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the Anti-Doping Policy Violations set forth in Article 2.1 through Article 2.10 of this Anti-Doping Policy.

    ARTICLE 2 ANTI-DOPING POLICY VIOLATIONS

    The purpose of Article 2 is to specify the circumstances and conduct which constitute Anti-Doping Policy Violations. Hearings in doping cases will proceed based on the assertion that one or more of these specific policies have been violated. Athletes or other Persons shall be responsible for knowing what constitutes an Anti-Doping Policy Violation and the substances and methods which have been included on the Prohibited List. The following constitute Anti-Doping Policy Violations:

    2.1 Presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athletes Sample

    2.1.1 It is each Athletes personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters his or her body. Athletes are responsible for any Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers found to be present in their Samples. Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Athletes part be demonstrated in order to establish an Anti-Doping Policy Violation under Article 2.1.

    2.1.2 Sufficient proof of an Anti-Doping Policy Violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athletes A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the B Sample is not analyzed; or, where the Athletes B Sample is analyzed and the analysis of the Athletes B Sample confirms the presence of the Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers found in the Athletes A Sample; or in the conditions described in the WADA International Standard For Laboratories, where the Athletes B Sample is split into two bottles and the analysis of the second bottle confirms the presence of the Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers found in the first bottle.

    2.1.3 Excepting those substances for which a quantitative threshold is specifically identified in the Prohibited List, the presence of any quantity

    UFC Anti-Doping Policy Version 1 (July 2015) 3

  • of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athletes Sample shall constitute an Anti-Doping Policy Violation. 2.1.4 As an exception to the general rule of Article 2.1, the Prohibited List or International Standards may establish special criteria for the evaluation of Prohibited Substances that can also be produced endogenously.

    2.2 Use or Attempted Use by an Athlete of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method

    2.2.1 It is each Athletes personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters his or her body and that no Prohibited Method is Used. Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Athletes part be demonstrated in order to establish an Anti-Doping Policy Violation for Use of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method. 2.2.2 The success or failure of the Use or Attempted Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not material. It is sufficient that the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method was Used or Attempted to be Used for an Anti-Doping Policy Violation to be committed.

    2.3 Evading, Refusing or Failing to Submit to Sample Collection Evading Sample collection, or without compelling justification refusing or failing to submit to Sample collection after notification as authorized in this Anti-Doping Policy.

    2.4 Whereabouts Failures Any combination of three Whereabouts Failures within a twelve-month period as defined in the Whereabouts Policy developed by UFC.

    2.5 Tampering or Attempted Tampering with any part of Doping Control Conduct which subverts the Doping Control process but which would not otherwise be included in the definition of Prohibited Methods. Tampering shall include, without limitation, intentionally interfering or attempting to interfere with a Doping Control official, providing fraudulent information to UFC or USADA, or intimidating or attempting to intimidate a potential witness.

    2.6 Possession of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method

    2.6.1 Possession by an Athlete In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method, or Possession by an Athlete Out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method which is prohibited Out-of-Competition unless the Athlete establishes

    UFC Anti-Doping Policy Version 1 (July 2015) 4

  • that the Possession is consistent with a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) granted in accordance with Article 4.4 or other acceptable justification. 2.6.2 Possession by an Athlete Support Person In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method, or Possession by an Athlete Support Person Out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method which is prohibited Out-of-Competition in connection with an Athlete, competition or training, unless the Athlete Support Person establishes that the Possession is consistent with a TUE granted to an Athlete in accordance with Article 4.4 or other acceptable justification.

    2.7 Trafficking or Attempted Trafficking in any Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method 2.8 Administration or Attempted Administration to any Athlete, In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method, or Administration or Attempted Administration to any Athlete Out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method that is prohibited Out-of-Competition 2.9 Complicity Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, conspiring, covering up or any other type of intentional complicity involving an Anti-Doping Policy Violation, Attempted Anti-Doping Policy Violation or violation of Article 10.12.1 by another Person. 2.10 Prohibited Association Association by an Athlete or other Person in a professional or sport-related capacity with any Athlete Support Person who:

    2.10.1 If subject to the authority of UFC, USADA, another Anti-Doping Organization or Athletic Commission, is serving a period of Ineligibility; or 2.10.2 If not subject to the authority of UFC, USADA another Anti-Doping Organization or Athletic Commission, has been convicted or found in a criminal, disciplinary or profes