Transportation Presentation FINAL FINAL

8/8/2019 Transportation Presentation FINAL FINAL

1/38

Transportation4


2/38

Light Rail and Street Car- Regiona

East Link- 2030

Light RailUrban Village

Light Rail Stations

LEGEND

Street Car

University Link- 2016

North Link- 2020(revised to 2021)

Westlake Center

Sound Transit- Light RailCentral Link began service between Westlake

and SeaTac Airport in 2009

U Link: scheduled service begins 2016, currenconstruction

North Link- Scheduled service begins 2021

East Link (Bellvue/Redmond), South Corridor (Redondo Beach/ Federal Way), and North Co(Shoreline/Lynnwood) are planned for 2030 an

Streetcar Network-Creating an Urban Village Transit Network (UTConnecting SLU, Capital Hill, Ballard, FremonUniversity District, Lower Queen Anne, and theWaterfrontU-LineRoute Length (from SLU)- 3.5 MilesCost- $42-46 Mil per mile

Ridership Estimate- 2.6-3.1 Mil annual


3/38

Heavy Bus UseModerate Bus Use

Bus Stop

LEGEND

Light Use

MAGNOLIA

QUEENANNE

DOWNTOWN

MONTLAKE

MADISONPARK

MADRONA

FREMONT

UNIVERSITY

DISTRICT

GREENLAKEBALLARD

SAND

POINT

NORTHGATEBLUERIDGE

BROADVIEW

BITTERLAKE JACKSON

PARK

LAKE CITY

NORTH BEACH

GREENWOOD

WALLINGFORD

PHINNEYRIDGE

CROWNHILLLOYAL

HEIGHTS

SODO

BEACON

HILL

MOUNTBAKER

COLUMBIA

CITY

RAINER

VALLEY

HARBORISLAND

ADMIRALDISTRICT

ALKI

WESTSEATTLE

DELRIDGE

GEORGETOWN

SOUTHLK. UNION

RAVENNA

MAPLE

LEAF

WEDGEWOOD

CENRALDISTRICT

FIRST HILL

EASTLAKE

CAPITOLHILL

To / From West Campus

Central Seattle

Capitol Hill 7, 9, 25, 43, 48 (56) First Hill 9, 205 (9)

Central Area 7, 9, 43, 48 (50) International District 7, 9, 71, 72, 73

Downtown Seattle

Seattle downtown 7, 25, 43, 66, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74E, 79 (83)

Northeast Seattle

Jackson Park 73, 78, 243 (22) Ravenna 65, 68, 73,

74, 79, 243 (50Lake City 65, 72, 75, 79, 243, Sand Point 74, 75 (15)

372 (36)Laurelhurst 25, 75 (15) University Village 25, 65, 68, 74,

243, 372 (48)Maple Leaf 68, 72, 72, 78, 79 View Ridge 71 (6)

(20)Northgate 66, 67, 68, 75 (24) Wedgwood 65, 71 (17)

North/Northwest Seattle

Ballard 44, 46 (19) Magnolia 31 (6)Fremont 31, 46, 74 (16) Queen Anne 31,45,46, 74 (20)Green Lake 48 (16) Wallingford 31,44,45,46,74 (35)

South Seattle

Columbia City 7, 9, 48 (43) White Center 133 (4)Rainier Beach 7, 9, 48 (43)

- http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/University/DraftReport/UATScha

Bus Transportaion - Regional


4/38

REGIONAL: VECHICLE TRANSPORTATION

Principle Arterial

Minor Route

LEGEND

I-5 Express

UW Campus

520 to Bellevue

Seattle dowtown

90 to Eastside

Peak Hour Trac Distribution:

NE 50th Street Link

NE 45th Street Link

Montlake Boulevard Link

Eastlake Avenue East Link

Roosevelt Way and 12th Avenue

NE Link Sputh of NE 65th Street


5/38

LEGEND

Shared use, sharrows indicated

Designated bicycle lane

No bicycle ammenities

Burke Gilman

Trail

520 Bridge,

connection to

Eastside

I-90 Bridge,

connection to

Eastside

Alki Trail

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION: BICYC

-Strong ammenities of urban trails such as Burke-Gilman

Trail, InterUrban Trail and Alki Trail

-No connection to Eastside from North due to character o

520 Bridge

-Good connection to Eastside from downtown via shared

I-90 Trail

-Regional disconnects between various trails, cyclists mus

resort to riding on surface streets, often unmarked for

cyclists

InterUrban Trail

Ship Canal Trail


6/38

Light Rail Transportation- District

U Link-

University Link alone is projected to add 70,000

boardings a day to the light rail system; line wilextend from Westlake Center and service Capi

Hill and the University District at Husky Stadiumon Montlake Blvd.

Husky Stadium Station: construction completio

2015

Light Rail service begins 2016Expected Daily Boarding- 25,000

North Link-North Link will extend service to Northgate Tran

Center, with stops at Brooklyn St and 45th,Roosevelt, and Northgate. Over 35,000 are ex

pected to board daily on the North Link alone.

Brooklyn Station completion 2019

Light Rail service begins 2021Expected Daily Boardings- 12,300

Light Rail (underground)Light Rail Access

Street Car Stops

LEGEND

Seattle Street Car


7/38

Bus Routes and Destinations - District

- Major bus routes run North / South

- Major Bus Destinations in the Univerrsity District are:Campus ParkwayHUBUnivesity Ave. & 45thUW Medical Center

Heavy Bus Use

Moderate Bus Use

LEGEND

Major Bus Destination


8/38

University

Bridge

Montlake Bridge

15th Ave NE

DISTRICT: VEHICULAR VOLUMES

Avergae number of daily vehicle flow was 52,094 in 2009Decreased by about 10.5% compared with 58,222 daily trips in 2008

The five gatehouses located close to Aterial principle, they are crutial in terms

vehicle control within the campus boundary

Core Connections from Campus:

Via Primary corridor Morning/ Mid/ Evening

To Seattle Downtown: Pine St, 23rd Ave, E 10-15/15/30 min

To Seattle Downtown: I-5 5-8/7-10/- min

To Seattle Downtown: Eastlake Ave. E, Fairview Ave.N 12/15/15 minTo Columbia City 23rd Ave. E, MLK Jr Way S 30/60/ - min

Woodinville SR-522, Both 15/15/30 min

Arterial Route

Minor Route

LEGEND

Gatehouse

1

2

3

4

5

NE 45th Sreet


9/38

-Burke-Gilman Trail provides broad acess to and around

campus

-Weak E/W connection across I-5 aside from BurkeGilman Trail

-North/South access compromised by heavy traffic anddangerous intersections across University Bridge and

Montlake Bridge

Seattle DOT Bicycle commuter estimates for 2012:-Students: 8% or 3,135 cyclists per day

-Faculty: 11% or 820 cyclists per day-Staff: 6% or 1,080 cyclists per day

Total: 12,435 cyclists commuting to UW campus per day!!

Majority arrive from West, 2nd greatest from North.

DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION: BICYCL

LEGEND

Shared use, sharrows indicated

Designated bicycle lane



10/38

Streetcar- Site Transportation

Frequent service- every 10 to 15 minutes

Stop spacing is relatively short.

Visible and easy-to-understand routing.

Connection to Urban Village Network

Curb Lane Stations along Campus Parkway, N

Pacific St, and University Way @ 45th and 50tCampus Parkway Eastbound becomes a single

vehicle lane with Streetcars running both East

West.

Light Rail

Light Rail Stop

Street Car Stop

LEGEND

Street Car Line


11/38

Site - Bus Use

EXISTING

- 42 bus routes serve campus

- 27,300 transite riders per day average

- 12 bus stops on west campus site

- 3 designated bus layover areas

- Nearly 10% of all metro users are U-Pass users

- 40% of UW students and staff commute with the Metro

- Traffic noise is l oudest on 15th Ave. and Campus Prky.

- Larger bus stop shelters are provided on Campus Prkwy. Pacific St. dohave bus stop shelters

- Major pedestrian areas slow bus traffic and can cause congestion

Heavy Bus UseModerate Bus Use

Bus Stop

LEGEND

Bus Layover Zone

14

15

15

13

25

7

4


12/38

SITE: VEHICULAR VOLUMES

The typology of the vehicular circulation in the west Campus can be divided into thr

catalogues, the analysis of the density of traffic flow illustrate the current condition

interms of accessbility, parking strategy, noise level, air pollution, and possiblity of

traffic accident.

The following 5 routes are identified as princile aterial:

West - East direction: NE Campus parkway, and NE Pacific Street

North - South direction: Roosevelt Way NE, University Way NE, and 15th Ave NE

As the traffic flow reduces, the following routes served as minor circultion:

West - East direction: NE 41th Street, NE 40th Street, and NE Boat Street

North - South direction 12th Ave NE, and Brooklyn NE

Forthuer more, The Adams Road, Adams Place, Cowlitz Road are Serice access a

parking paths.

Principle Arterial

Minor Route

Service Access

LEGEND

Heavy Trac junctions in West Campus

Campus Parkway & Roosevelt Way NE & 15th Ave NE &

15th Ave NE 11th Ave NE NE Pacific Street


13/38

SITE: CAR PARKING ANALYSIS

The average number of daily vehicle flow was 3,156 in 2009.

Compared to 2008 when 3,374 trips were counted, a 6.4% decrease.

The U-pass system encourages the traffic accessibilty: the volume of 24

vehicle trips to campus has decresed 18.8% between 2004 and 2009

Peak of inbound period 6:00am to 10:00am,

Average amount 900 vehicles

Peak of outbound period 4:00pm to 7:00pm,

Average amount 800 vehicles

Examples of car parking useage:

Parking Space Average Peak Time

University way: 1680 49% 63%

Steven court below grond: 1827 63% 73%

LEGENDDepartment

Residential

Private and commericial

Surface Parking

Structured Parking

Below Ground Parking

W10 Surface Car parking Portage Bay Parkig Facility Steven court car pa

Cowlitz Road NE Pacic Street NE Pacic Street

98 Parking Spaces 1273 Parking Spaces 1827 Parking Space


14/38

SITE TRANSPORTATION: BICYCLES

Traffic conflicts involving bicycles were noted at many intersectioincluding:

LEGEND

Shared use, sharrows indicatedDesignated bicycle lane


Bicycle storage

Bicycle service facilityBurke Gilman Trail Crossings at

streets south of campus

Roosevelt

near Unive

Bridge

Along University

Recycled

Cycles

ASUW Bike Shop

(temporary)


15/38

Heavy Pedestrian UseModerate PedestrianUseKey Circulation points

LEGEND

2

4

4

5

1

2

3

45

1: Intersection with high

pedestrians.

Ex: Intersection of NE C

Parkway & University W

2: Positive pedestrian e

Ex: Alley on 42nd St. Se

access maintained whil

enhancing pedestrian e

(outside of formal site b

Ex: N side of Condon HBuilding volume steps b

accomodate pedestrian

bicycle commuters.

Ex: Near Brooklyn AvNE Boat Street. Mid-b

crosswalk in accordanUW Master Plan, Sea

Campus (2003).

2

4

Pedestrian Flow- Existing Conditions

one minute

walking time

1

45

3: Negative pedestrian

South side of Condon H

Concrete wall confronts

Campus Parkway whicprimary pedestrian corr

1

1


16/38

Heavy Pedestrian UseModerate PedestrianUseKey Circulation points

LEGEND

13

Pedestrian Flow- Existing Conditions

(cont.)

4: Dangerous Pedestria

Ex: Eastlake-Roosovelt-

Parkway NE converege

Ex: Intersection of Bu

Trail and Brooklyn Ave

5: No Pedestrian Acce

Ex: Along NE Boat Str

This area is classied Stable Urban Zone (S

Shoreline Master Planhas allowances for UW

for water-related instruaddition to public acce

2

4

5

1

2

3

45

2

4

1

45

4one minute

walking time

1

North-South Streets


17/38

Brooklyn Ave. NE

North South Streets

University Way NE

NE Pacic Street

sidewalk width 8

Mid Blocksidewalk width 8

NE 40th Streetsidewalk width 8

NE Campus Parkwaysidewalk width 8

NE Pacic Street

sidewalk width 6

At BG intersectionsidewalk width 5, then N of

BG 14


NE Campus Parkwaysidewalk width 12

NE Boat Streetsidewalk width 9


East-West Streets


18/38

NE 40th Street(Lincoln Way)

At this point vechicular accessterminates, and pedestrians

and bicyclists have different

routes

Brooklyn Ave NE

(north view)

University Way NEsidewalk width 8

15th Ave NEsidewalk width 15Brooklyn Ave NE

(view towards

15th Ave NE)

NE Campus Parkway

Mid-Block Brooklyn Ave NE

sidewalk width= 12

University Way NE

sidewalk width= 18

15th Ave NE

sidewalk width= 8

12th Ave NE

no pedestrian crosswalks

Informal path from Roosevelt

to NE Capmus Parkway for

pedestrians


19/38

Observed Preferred Use

- Mapping of existing preferred uses of streets and paths for each type oftransportation.

- Preferred use patterns are common on 15th Ave. but also have conflictinintersections with other East / West paths

- Pedestrian flow East / West on Campus Parkway is directly linked to thebus stops

CarsBusses

Pedestrian

LEGEND

Bicycles


20/38

Infrastructure deciency

Multiple intersecting modes of transportation, right of way

confusion, bicycle & pedestrian crossing are absent and dan

gerous, no signal mitigation

Pedestrian crossing unregulated North-South, signage unclea

vehicle conflict between cars and bus circulation, trafficspeed is unmarked, car parking area is unclear

Hierarchy of intersection is unclear

High unregulated pedestrian flow creates street back up for

cars and buses

Multiple intersecting modes of transportation, right of way

confusion, inadequate pedestrian and bicycle access,

unshielded and unmetrical left turn, Congestion of buses an

cars

High traffic of all modes of transportation

Burke Gilman crossing- right of way and sight lines is uncl

Existing infrastructure lacks of activities

Lack of public waterfront access

VehicleBus

Pedestrian

(Volume)

Street car

Future Route

Waterfront

LEGEND

Bicycle

1

1

2

3

5

4

6

7

8

9

2 3

4

5

6

8

9

1

7


21/38

Future Improvements & Studies

LIGHT RAIL/STREET CAR:

1. Move stop away from high used intersection

2. Sidewalk and signage improvements will be necessary for increase

volumes resulting from light rail stop at 45th and Brooklyn

3. NE Pacific stop be integrated with existing traffic flows and connecte

campus.

BUS:

4. Street and bus stop improvements (scheduled with 15th Ave NE

upgrades)

5. Improve bus transfer terminus and layover facilities

6. Increase east/west bus traffic to ease flows on 45th Street

CAR:

7. Extend 12th Avenue NE street connection across NE Campus Park

8. Improve traffic flow at signals

BICYCLE

9.Connecting bike lanes between University Bridge and adjacent stree

provide clear routes for safe access

10.Add bike lanes to Campus Parkway NE11. Develop Brooklyn Ave as a North/South bike corridor

12. Widen Burke Gilman Trail to accomodate high volumes around UW

13. Improve intersection at Eastlake and Furman to improve safety

PEDESTRIAN:

14. Approved green street development (per Seattle Neighborhoods)

15. Pedestrian enhancements (Mahlum Design)

16. Potential midblock linkages

17. Extend Sakuma Point park and waterfront access

Bus

Car

Pedestrian

LEGENDLight Rail/Street Car

Bicycle


22/38

Future Waterfront Development?


23/38

Transportation

Future?


24/38

Transportation4

Transportation Appendix


25/38

Example Roadway Cross Section from 2007 Bicycle Master Plan and Design

Recommendations from SDOT Right-Of-Way Improvement Manual

Design Recommendations for Arterial Streets:

Sidewalk:

6 foot

MIN.

Shoulder:

5 foot

MIN.

Bike Lane:

5 foot MIN.

at curb

4 foot MIN.

if no curbTurning

lane:

11 foot

MIN.

Driving

lane:

12 foot

MIN.

Driving

lane:

14 foot MIN.

if shared with

bikes

Parking:

8 foot MIN.

10 foot

MIN. if on

bus route

Street-

car

lane:

12 foot

MIN.


26/38

Example Roadway Cross Section from 2007 Bicycle Master Plan and Design

Recommendations from SDOT Right-Of-Way Improvement Manual

Design Recommendations for Arterial Streets: Sidewalk:

6 foot

MIN.

Shoulder:

5 foot

MIN.

Bike Lane:

5 foot MIN.

at curb

4 foot MIN.if no curb

Turning

lane:

11 foot

MIN.

Driving

lane:

12 foot

MIN.

Driving

lane:

14 foot MIN.

if shared with

bikes

Parking:

8 foot MIN.

10 foot

MIN. if onbus route


27/38


28/38

ALLEY

MARGIN

ALLEY

MARGINRIGHT-OF WAY

ALLEY PAVEMENT

WIDTH PER TABLE

LC

1

MAX 2

4.7%* 4.7%*

COMPACTED

SUBGRADE PER

STD. SPEC. 2-06

SURFACING

PER CHAPTER

4.7.2: ROADWAY PAVEMENTEXISTING

GROUND

* SEE STD PLAN 403.

ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS SHALL CONSIDER AN ADA

ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FOR THE ENTIRE ALLEY.

** REFER TO CHAPTER 3: ALLEY WIDTH REQUIREMENTS

Figure 3-15 September 2

Alley Improvement

SEATTLERIGHT-OF-WAY

manual


29/38


30/38

June 15, 2007 SDOT Team Meeting 4

Performance Measures:

Street Type = Classification + Land Use


31/38


3. PEDESTRIAN Walking Space + Buffers:

Protection from moving traffic

Standards

Street Type Sidewalk Planting Parking/BikeTotal(Minimum)

Regional Connector 6 feet 4 feet 0 feet 10 feet

CommercialConnector

6 feet 4 feet 8 feet 18 feet

Local Connector 6 feet 6 feet 6 feet 18 feet

Green Street 8 feet 10 feet 0 feet 18 feetMain Street/Mixed Use Street

8 feet 6 feet 8 feet 22 feet

LOS is determined by the percentage meeting the standard, measured along a

continuous street-type segment

Source: Seattle Right-of-Way Improvements Manual: Section 4.2, Chapter 4 Design Criteria


32/38


5. PEDESTRIAN: Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflicts

Measures how many vehicles turn across the crosswalk whilepedestrians are crossing

Count used is the total for all signal cycles in the PM peak hour

Thresholds vary by street type:

200-400 Vehicles = Green Streets/ Main Streets/Local Connectors 400-600 Vehicles = Mixed Use Streets/Commercial Connectors

600-800 Vehicles = Regional Connectors

Highest measured in UATAS is over 1,000 vehicles

EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS


33/38

City of Seattle University Area Transportation Action StrategyDraft 2/6/2008 Page 11

Pedestrian System PerformanceThe evaluation of the pedestrian system in the University area focused on theprovision of sidewalk facilities, the adequacy of space between the pedestrianfacilities and adjacent vehicle traffic and the degree of ease for pedestrians tocross streets at signalized intersections. Performance measures for pedestrianfacilities were defined based on their relationship to the street and adjacent landuses. Specific thresholds, tied to the adjacent land uses were set for eachperformance measure. To evaluate the pedestrian system, the analysis appliedthe following performance measures:

Pedestrian walking space: The percentage of pedestrian facilities(sidewalk only) that meets the minimum width as described by theRight-of-Way Improvement Manual.

Pedestrian facilities: The percentage of pedestrian facilities that meetsthe Right-of-Way Improvement Manual guidelines for sidewalk,planting strip and other spaces that separate moving vehicles andpedestrians such as on-street parking, and bike lanes.

Ease of street crossings at intersections: Two measures are used: 1) Thenumber of vehicles conflicting with pedestrians, such as right-turningand left-turning vehicles in a permissible signal phase, and 2) the lengthof the traffic signal cycles.

Pedestrian Walking Space

The basic facilities for pedestrian travel within an urban environment aresidewalk and crosswalks. The minimum sidewalk width required by Rightof-Way Improvement Manual (Chapter 4.11 Sidewalks) is 6 feet. The performancemeasure calculates, by street type, the percentage of the sidewalks that aregreater than the minimum 6-foot sidewalk width. The following formula wasused to calculate the percentage of the adequacy of walking space:

Percent Adequate Walking Space = SUM (the length of the blockface having averaged sidewalk width greater than 6 feet) / (thelength of pedestrian segment) X 100.

This level of service indicator provides an overall view about the adequacy ofsidewalks within the UATAS study area. Table 2 defines the LOS and thresholdsfor adequacy of sidewalks. The thresholds vary based upon the street type

35

City of Seattle University Area Transportation Action SDraft 2/6/2008 P

classifications. For Local Connector streets, a threshold of LOS B is requiredother street types have a LOS C threshold.

Table 2. Level of Service for Adequacy of Walking Space (AWS-LOS)

Level of Service Percent Meeting Threshold

AWS-LOS A 95 to 100 percent

AWS -LOS B 90 to 95 percent

AWS -LOS C 85 to 90 percent

AWS -LOS D 80 to 85 percent

AWS -LOS E 70 to 80 percent

AWS -LOS F less than 70 percent

ThresholdsLOS B for Regional Connector, Commercial Connector, Main Street/Mixed Use and GreenLOS C for Local Connector

Higher levels of service (LOS A or B) indicate adequate sidewalks. Lower leof service may require improvements to correct substandard facilities. Thisindicator addresses pedestrian facilities at a macro-scale level, and does notaddress important issues such as compliance with the Americans with DisaAct (curb ramps), sidewalk maintenance or other facility issues. Figure 3 shthe sidewalk widths along individual segments (blocks) of University area types. Figure 4 displays these segments relative to meeting the threshold

standards for each street type.

36

EXISTING CONDITIONS Figure 6-2. Areas of Transit Problems


34/38

City of Seattle University Area Transportation Action StrategyDraft 2/6/2008 Page 13

Figure 3. Existing Walking Space Widths

The figure shows the average width ofthe sidewalk or other paved surface byblock.

37

University Area Transportation Study April 2002Transportation Problems 6-9

Source: Mirai Associates, 2001.

NE 65th St

NE 55th St

NE 50th St

NE 45th St

NE Blakely St

SR 520

Portage Bay

Union Bay

52

5

5

ExcesssiveTransit Delays

Low level ofService

Low transitspeeds

Low transitand HOV speeds

Low transitspeeds

Low transitspeeds

Figure 6-1. Areas of Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Problems

Figure 6-3. Areas of Vehicle/Roadway Problems


35/38



NE 65th St

NE 55th St

NE 50th St

NE 45th St

NE Blakely St

SR 520

Portage Bay

Union Bay

North

Not to scale

520

5

5

Difficult

pedestriancrossings

Pedestrian/bicycle

conflicts

Difficultpedestriancrossings

Lack of easyconnections to Burke-

Gilman trail

Inadequate facilitiesto cross I- 5

Inadequatefacilities

Inadequatesidewalks


Inadequatesidewalks

Burke-Gilman trail/street crossing

conflicts


Pedestrian/ bike/ vehicleconflicts, lacks trail

connection

Bike, PedDelays

Inadequatepedestrian

facilities

Lack of north-south bikecorridor

Inadequate bikefacilities, lackstrail connection




NE 65th St

NE 55th St

NE 50th St

NE 45th St

NE Blakely St

SR 520

Portage Bay

Union Bay

52

5

5

Constrainedbridge capacity

Not enough vehiclestorage capacity

Congestedinterchange

Congestedroadway

Non-peak periodexcessive delays

Not enough vehiclestorage space

Not enoughvehicle storage

space

Left turnpocket too

short

Congestedroadway

Congestedroadway

UndefinedIntersection


36/38

Husky Stadium Stati


37/38

Brooklyn St

Links/ Sources Catalyst Share Site


38/38

SDOT: University Area Transportation Action Strategy -http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/docs/uatas/UATAS2.pdf

SDOT: University Transportation Study Existing conditionshttp://www.seattle.gov/transportation/University/DraftReport/UATSchapt5.pdf

SDOT: University Transportation Study Transportation problemshttp://www.seattle.gov/transportation/University/DraftReport/UATSchapt6.pdf

SDOT: University Transportation Study Future conditionshttp://www.seattle.gov/transportation/University/DraftReport/UATSchapt7.pdf

SDOT: University Transportation Study Transportation Improvementshttp://www.seattle.gov/transportation/University/DraftReport/UATSchapt8.pdf

King County Metro University District

http://metro.kingcounty.gov/tops/bus/neighborhoods/university_district.html

King County Metro - University District Maphttp://metro.kingcounty.gov/tops/bus/area_maps/udist_routes.html

Sound Transit- Light Railhttp://projects.soundtransit.org/

Seattle Street Car- Future Networkhttp://www.seattlestreetcar.org/future.asp

http://www.seattle.gov/transportation/pedestrian.htm

http://www.seattle.gov/Transportation/rowmanual/manual/

Fall 2010 Transportation Study

UW Malhum PreDesign Volume 1, see pages 41,53,63,70

UW Master Plan, see pages 19-23, 33-137, 163-165

Documents

Transportation Presentation FINAL FINAL