Click here to load reader
Upload
vunhan
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Tracing the genetic roots of the indigenous White Park Cattle
A. Ludwig*, L. Alderson†, E. Fandrey‡, D. Lieckfeldt*, T. K. Soederlund* and K. Froelich‡
*Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10324, Berlin, Germany. †Rare Breeds International,
4 Cleaves Avenue, Colerne, Chippenham,Wilts, SN14 8BX, UK. ‡Tierpark ArcheWarder e.V., Zentrum f€ur alte Haus- und Nutztierrassen e.V.,
Langwedeler Weg 11, 24646, Warder, Germany.
Summary The White Park Cattle (WPC) is an indigenous ancient breed from the British Isles which
has a long-standing history in heroic sagas and documents. The WPC has retained many
primitive traits, especially in their grazing behaviour and preferences. Altogether, the aura of
this breed has led to much speculation surrounding its origin. In this study, we sequenced the
mitogenomes from 27WPC and three intronic fragments of genes from the Y chromosome of
three bulls. We observed six novel mitogenomic lineages that have not been found in any
other cattle breed so far. We found no evidence that the WPC is a descendant of a particular
North or West European branch of aurochs. The WPC mitogenomes are grouped in the T3
cluster together with most other domestic breeds. Nevertheless, both molecular markers
support the primitive position of the WPC within the taurine breeds.
Keywords ancient breed, conservation, domestication, entire mitochondrial genome,
genetic diversity, USP9Y, UTY, ZFY
Introduction
The White Park Cattle (WPC) is a primitive breed which has
been retained in Britain for many centuries. The breed is
known for ease of calving, excellent foraging ability,
longevity, milkiness, high fertility and exceptional hybrid
vigour (Alderson 1997). Today, the breed is used mainly for
the production of high-quality meat and for conservation
grazing.
The supposition of an old history for the WPC is based on
a few important references to cattle with a white coat
colour, which are found in ancient Irish history starting in
the first century B.C. (Cattle Raid of Cooley – O’Rahilly
1970). The aura of an ancient phenotype of white cattle has
led to much speculation surrounding the origin of the WPC.
However, their origin is still a mystery and an open
question. Today, it is widely accepted that modern taurine
breeds are descended from the extinct aurochs, Bos prim-
igenius, but this species had several genetic lineages, which
are partly distantly related (G€otherstr€om et al. 2005; Stock
et al. 2009; Edwards et al. 2010; Lari et al. 2011). Their
contribution to the gene pool of domestic cattle breeds
has been discussed controversially (Loftus et al. 1994;
G€otherstr€om et al. 2005; Achilli et al. 2008; Stock et al.
2009; Edwards et al. 2010; Lari et al. 2011). On one hand,
the WPC could be descended from the northern (British)
aurochs, but on the other hand, they could be the north-
western extremity of migration from the Middle East in
common with many other West European cattle breeds.
Although mitochondrial sequences have been used many
times successfully for phylogenetic reconstructions of breed
origin in domestic animals during the last decade (Cieslak
et al. 2010; Groeneveld et al. 2010; Lenstra et al. 2012), the
Y chromosomal sequences were less intensively investi-
gated (Lippold et al. 2011). Recently, a novel polymorphism
at the Y chromosome was detected (Bonfiglio et al. 2012a,
b), which allows the classification of paternal haplogroups
in cattle. In this study, we trace back the genetic roots of
the WPC using entire mitochondrial genome sequences
(maternal lineages) as well as short intron sequences of the
Y chromosome (paternal lineages) for detecting haplo-
groups.
Material and methods
In total, 19 EDTA blood samples and eight hair samples
were analysed (for their origin see Table S1). DNA from
blood was extracted using the standard protocol of the
DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), whereas the hair
protocol of the All-Tissue DNA-Kit (GEN-IAL) was used for
the hair samples.
Mitogenome analysis: We used D-loop sequences for a
genetic proof of origin indentifying offspring from the same
Address for correspondence
A. Ludwig, Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Leibniz-Institute for
Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10324 Berlin, Germany.
E-mail: [email protected]
Accepted for publication 17 December 2012
doi: 10.1111/age.12026
1© 2013 The Authors, Animal Genetics © 2013 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics
matrilineage. The mitogenome analysis was conducted
following a previously published procedure (Achilli et al.
2008). However, this approach produced satisfactory
results only for the blood samples. Additional primers
(Table S2) were necessary for the hair samples, shortening
the fragment lengths. Sanger Sequencing was done with the
BigDye Ready Reaction kit v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems) on a
3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) following
standard procedure.
Y chromosomal analysis: Our sample set included three
bulls for which we were able to investigate Y chromosome
variation in the intronic sequences of the following genes:
ZFY, UTY and USP9Y. We followed the procedure recently
described (Bonfiglio et al. 2012a,b). In addition to these
procedures, we decided to perform capillary sequence
analyses (ABI 3130xl) to achieve the detection of additional
sequence variants. Originally restriction analyses were
suggested, which are less sensitive but easier to handle for
large sample sets.
Phylogenetic calculations: The neighbour-joining trees
were calculated in MEGA 5.0 Tamura et al. (2011) using
p-distance values (1000 bootstrap replicates). Additionally, a
median-joining network (not shown) was calculated illus-
trating the phylogenetic relationships of the T3 cluster in
more detail. We used NETWORK 4.5.1.6 (Fluxus Technology
Ltd.) for this calculation.
Beef cattle [DQ124401]Korean cattle [DQ124375]
9856
T4
Ukrainian grey [GQ129208]Bos primigenius [BVA2] ItalyWPC21_25 [KC153977]Bos reference sequence [V00654]Pietmontese [EU177815]
Korean cattle [DQ124379]
56
67
51
[ ]Korean cattle [DQ124371]
WPC6_26 [KC153972]Holstein Friesean [DQ124406]Chianina [EU177825]Beef cattle [DQ124387]WPC24 [KC153976]
67
65
T
T3
Pettiazza [EU177832]WPC3_19 [KC153974]Chillingham cattleWPC23 [KC153975]WPC1 [KC153971]
Cabannina [EU177840]99
59
54
T
T1/2/3Cabannina [EU177850]
Redena [EU177861]Podolica [EU177843]Beef cattle [DQ124399]
Calvana [JN817306]Iraqi [EU177864]100
94
84
100
T1
T2
T5Piedmontese [EU177863]Chianina [FJ971081]Italian Red Pied. [FJ971082]Romagnola [FJ971083]Bos primigenius [JQ437479] Poland
DQ124389 FC3 P
100
99100
96
P
Q
T5
100Bos primigenius CPC98 England
Romagnola [FJ971087]Cinisara [FJ971086]Agerolese [FJ971084]
Mongolian cattle [FJ971088]Iranian cattle [EU177870]100
85
I (indicus)
R100
100
0.002
Figure 1 Phylogenetic tree calculated in MEGA-based p-distance values from the mitogenome sequences of domestic cattle breeds and aurochs
sequences. Novel White Park Cattle(WPC) mitogenomes are in bold.
© 2013 The Authors, Animal Genetics © 2013 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics, doi: 10.1111/age.12026
Ludwig et al.2
Results
We found six sequence variants in the WPC mitochondrial
genome. All of them were novel in Bos BLAST searches and
represent a unique mitogenomic pool for the WPC. All
mutations were compared with the bovine reference
sequence (BRS) (Table S3) and are archived in GenBank
(KC153972–KC153977). Within-group variation ranged
from one to 14 mutations. Sequence lengths differed from
16 339 bp (all other) to 16 426 bp (WPC1) and 16 448 bp
(WPC23) respectively. The differences are caused by tandem
repetition of a 22-bp motif located between positions 15 974
and 15 995 (control region) of the BRS. This repeat motif is
present five times inWPC1and six times inWPC23. Themotif
is found in different members of the bovine family, but so far
no repetition has been detected (BLAST search 08/10/2012).
The repeat formation in the WPC leads to heteroplasmatic
events, which were also found in some other bovine species
(data not shown). Phylogenetic reconstructions based on
neighbour joining, including representatives of all bovine
haplogroups, showed that all mitogenomes of the WPC
belong to the haplogroup T, main subgroup T3. However,
WPC1, WPC23 and the Chillingham cattle (Hudson et al.
2012) were grouped together with EU177840 (Cabannina
breed) representing a T1/2/3 haplotype (Achilli et al. 2008).
This group has a basal position to T3 and T4 in the
phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig. 1) and is discussed as
primitive within domestic cattle (Achilli et al. 2008).
Y chromosome
Identical intronic sequence fragments (overall 1237 bp) of
three different genes were detected from the three bulls. In
comparison, no new variants were found with previously
published sequences. Neighbour-joining analyses resulted in
a grouping within the Bos taurus haplogroup Y2 (Fig. S1).
This group is preferentially found in primitive breeds from
southern Europe. Recently, the Y1 haplogroup was men-
tioned as ancestral (no insertion in Bison bonasus, no data
available) for the USP9Y gene (Bonfiglio et al. 2012a,b),
whereas our analyses suggest the Y2 status as ancestral for
the ZFY and UTY genes. Both haplogroups occurred with
contrasting frequencies in two studies focussing on the
extinct aurochs (G€otherstr€om et al. 2005; Bollongino et al.
2008).
Discussion
Although records have traced back the existence of cattle
with a white coat many centuries, the WPC remained a
local breed until the early 20th century, when there were
exports to Europe, and the mid-20th century, when animals
were exported to North America (Alderson 1997). During
the 20th century, the population was small, and an acute
hierarchical structure resulted in an increasing degree of
inbreeding. Currently, the global population is about 3000
animals, and within-breed diversity in Britain has been
prioritised by expansion of population size and a dedicated
breeding programme. Comparative breed studies (Royle
1986; Blott et al. 1998) indicated that the WPC is very
distinct from other breeds, both in appearance and genetic
distance, and they retain many ‘primitive’ traits especially
in their grazing behaviour and preferences. These traits may
indicate a breed that has a unique history of artificial
selection and inbreeding in a small population. An Irish
study showed unique haplotypes based on partial mito-
chondrial D-loop sequences and suggested instead its origins
may lie in the Middle East, as it identified a link to
haplotypes found in Anatolian cattle (Flynn 2009).
The outcome of our combined mitogenome analyses and
Y chromosomal studies produced no evidence that the
WPC is a descendant of a particular North or West
European branch of aurochs. The WPC mitogenomes are
grouped in the T3 cluster together with most other
domestic breeds and the mitogenome of an Italian aurochs
(Lari et al. 2011). Notably, the Italian aurochs’s lineage is
phylogenetically only distantly related to its European
counterparts from England (Edwards et al. 2010) and
Poland (Lipinski et al. 2012). The mitogenomes of Western
and Eastern Europe aurochs were clustered in the P group,
whereas the Italian aurochs is a member of the T3 group.
Considering archaeological evidence, cattle were domesti-
cated in the Fertile Crescent about 8800 to 8300 B.C.
(Ajmone-Marsan et al. 2010), and early domestic cattle
were brought to Europe by the first farmers (Troy et al.
2001). Consequently, the roots of the genetic lineages of
the WPC are most likely in the Middle East. These founder
lineages migrated together with first farmers to southern
Europe, and sometime in the past they spread to the British
Isles. We found no evidence for introgression of North
European (British) aurochs. Nevertheless, the WPC has
substantial genetic variation. Unquestionably, the WPC
has a great conservation value resulting from its unique
cultural and historical importance.
Acknowledgements
We thank the farmers who provided samples and infor-
mation. Special thanks to Uwe G. W. Hesse (Frankenberg,
Germany) and Mario Nagel (Karlsbad/Spielberg,
Germany).
References
Achilli A., Olivieri A., Pellecchia M. et al. (2008) Mitochondrial
genomes of extinct aurochs survive in domestic cattle. Current
Biology 18, R157–8.
Ajmone-Marsan P., Garcia J.F. & Lenstra J.A. (2010) On the origin
of cattle: how aurochs became cattle and colonized the world.
Evolutionary Anthropology 19, 148–57.
© 2013 The Authors, Animal Genetics © 2013 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics, doi: 10.1111/age.12026
Mitogenome and y-chromosome variation of WPC 3
Alderson L. (1997) A Breed of Distinction. Countrywide Livestock
Ltd, Shrewsbury.
Anderson S., de Bruijn M.H., Coulson A.R., Eperon I.C., Sanger F. &
Young I.G. (1982) Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial
DNA. Conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial
genome. Journal of Molecular Biology 156, 683–717.
Blott S.C., Williams J.L. & Haley C.S. (1998) Genetic relationships
among European cattle breeds. Animal Genetics 29, 273–82.
Bollongino R., Elsner J., Vigne J.-D. & Burger J. (2008) Y-SNPs do
not indicate hybridisation between European aurochs and
domestic cattle. PLoS ONE 3, e3418.
Bonfiglio S., De Gaetano A., Tesfaye K., Grugni V., Semino O. &
Ferretti L. (2012a) A novel USP9Y polymorphism allowing a
rapid and unambiguous classification of Bos taurus Y chromo-
somes into haplogroups. Animal Genetics, 43, 611–3.
Bonfiglio S., Ginja C., De Gaetano A. et al. (2012b) Origin and
spread of Bos taurus: New clues from mitochondrial genomes
belonging to haplogroup T1. PLoS ONE 7, e38601.
Cieslak M., Pruvost M., Benecke N., Hofreiter M., Morales A.,
Reissmann M. & Ludwig A. (2010) Origin and history of
mitochondrial DNA lineages in domestic horses. PLoS ONE 5,
e15311.
Edwards C.J., Magee D.A., Park S.D. et al. (2010) A complete
mitochondrial genome sequence from a mesolithic wild aurochs
(Bos primigenius). PLoS ONE 5, e9255.
Flynn P. (2009) Characterisation of rare Irish cattle breeds by
comparative molecular studies using nuclear and mitochondrial
DNA markers. MSc thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin,
Ireland.
G€otherstr€om A., Anderung C., Hellborg L., Galil R., Smith E.C.,
Bradley D.G. & Ellegren H. (2005) Cattle domestication in the
Near East was followed by hybridization with aurochs bulls in
Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272, 2345–51.
Groeneveld L.F., Lenstra J.A., Eding H. et al. (2010) Genetic
diversity in farm animals – a review. Animal Genetics 41, 6–31.
Hudson G., Wilson I., Payne B.I.A., Elson J., Samuels D.C.,
Santibanez-Korev M., Hall S.J.G. & Chinnery P.F. (2012) Unique
mitochondrial DNA in highly inbred feral cattle.Mitochondrion 12,
438–40.
Lari M., Rizzi E., Mona S. et al. (2011) The complete mitochondrial
genome of an 11,450-year-old aurochsen (Bos primigenius) from
central Italy. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, 32.
Lenstra J.A., Groeneveld L.F., Eding H. et al. (2012) Molecular tools
and analytical approaches for the characterization of farm
animal genetic diversity. Animal Genetics 43, 483–502.
Lipinski D., Zeyland J., Nowacka A., Szalata M., Dzieduszycki A.M.,
Ryba M.S., Przystalowska H. & Slomski R. (2012): Bos primige-
nius mitochondrion, complete genome (JQ437479). Unpublished
sequence from GenBank.
Lippold S., Knapp M., Kuznetsova T. et al. (2011) Discovery of lost
diversity of paternal horse lineages using ancient DNA. Nature
Communications 2, 450.
Loftus R.T., MacHugh D.E., Bradley D.G., Sharp P.M. & Cunning-
ham P. (1994) Evidence for two independent domestications of
cattle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91,
2757–61.
O’Rahilly C. (1970) T�ain B�o C�ualgne. Dublin Institute for Advanced
Studies, Dublin, Ireland.
Royle N.J. (1986) New C-band polymorphism in the White Park
Cattle of Great Britain. Journal of Heredity 77, 366–7.
Stock F., Edwards C.J., Bollongino R., Finlay E.K., Burger J. &
Bradley D.G. (2009) Cytochrome b sequences of ancient cattle and
wild ox support phylogenetic complexity in the ancient and
modern bovine populations. Animal Genetics 40, 694–700.
Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M. & Kumar S.
(2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using
maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum
parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 2731–9.
Troy C.S., MacHugh D.E., Bailey J.F. et al. (2001) Genetic evidence
for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle.Nature 410, 1088–91.
Supporting information
Additional supporting information may be found in the
online version of this article.
Figure S1. Phylogenetic analyses based on three intronic
Y chromosomal sequences.
Table S1. Origin and pedigree of White Park Cattle (WPC)
that were analysed in this study.
Table S2. Additional primers that were used for the hair
samples DNA.
Table S3. Mitogenome haplotype definition.
© 2013 The Authors, Animal Genetics © 2013 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics, doi: 10.1111/age.12026
Ludwig et al.4