310

Total Field Theory

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Total Field Theory
Page 2: Total Field Theory

Reinstatement of the Abandoned Cosmological Constant& Unified (Steady State) Field Theory. The New Gravity

1 - Contents

Page 3: Total Field Theory

*Copyright © December 1999 (*Previous copyrights 1959, '60, '66, '70, '79 '85 & '88.) *By Kent B. Robertson Published by Great Continental Eurasian Green Grass RiverDragon Productions Unlimited

Cover design & special effects by Austin P. Torney *******************

A proposed resolution to an ongoing 4-dimensional space-time gridlock. © By K. B. Robertson. ____________________________________________________________ formerly entitled: The New Gravity, Gravity Is the 4th Dimension Extraterrestrial Physics 101 Copyright © 1959, '60, '66, '70, '79, '85, '99, 2005 & 2006 by *K B Robertson (* Aka, the White Mongol, That Rascal Puff, etceteras. All rights reserved. With acknowledgement, may be reproduced for educational and non-commercial purposes.) (Please Note: Work In Progress. Gravity is the 4-D space-time continuum. By popular request of distinguished readers, the introductory material to this anthological and narrative work has been abbreviated to accommodate an easier beginning - toward a remarkably comprehensive and unprecedented understanding of post graduate information in later segments of this non-mathematical approach to theoretical physics in general, and Einstein's work in particular - the two considerations of which are inseparable. For the most part, the math in this subject is already history, what remains to be translated is the comprehensive meaning of the existing documentary references and math. It is the objective of this work to present a tenable non-mathematical interpretation, which, the reader will note, is all based on the same self-revealing premise.) Since 1959, the work has been small press printed, internationally distributed and sold out of print in ten hard copy editions of essays and books. This is a publicly accessible presentation, with an invitation to whoever may care to correct, corroborate or otherwise comment upon.

--------------------------------------------

2 - Contents

Page 4: Total Field Theory

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION - Page 5

Chapter One - Page 13FROM NEWTON TO EINSTEIN

THE GRAVITATIONAL ALTERNATIVE

Chapter Two - Page 44THE 4-DIMENSIONAL REPRISE

Chapter Three - Page 62“OBVIOUSLY MATTER IS NOT EXPANDING”

Chapter Four - Page 91FINDING THE 5th & 6th DIMENSIONS

Chapter Five - Page 107MAXWELL’S ACTION AT A DISTANCE, LAMBDA,

& NON ABSOLUTE SPACE-TIME DILATION

Chapter Six - Page 138THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT & GEODESICS

Chapter Seven - Page 154THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE, INERTIA, GRAVITY & E=MC2

Chapter Eight - Page 168THE BIG BANG IS WRONG THE SIGHT AND SOUND OF THE

‘INCOMPREHENSIBLE’ 4TH DIMENSION

Chapter Nine - Page 196REINSTATEMENT OF THE STEADY STATE

& UNIFIED FIELD THEORIES

Chapter Ten - Page 216THE DIVISORY DILEMMA OF LARGE & SMALL FORCES

Chapter Eleven - Page 223QUANTUM MECHANICS RECONSIDERED FROM

4-D PARTICLE TO 5 & 6-D FIELD Part I

3 - Contents

Page 5: Total Field Theory

Chapter Twelve - Page 232QUANTUM MECHANICS RECONSIDERED FROM

4-D PARTICLE TO 5 & 6-D FIELD Part II

Chapter Thirteen - Page 236QUANTUM WAVE & FIELD MECHANICS

Chapter Fourteen - Page 244AUXILIARY INFORMATION

EPILOGUE Part I

Chapter Fifteen - Page 256EPILOGUE Part II

Chapter Sixteen - Page 263AFTERWARD

Chapter Seventeen - Page 271AFTERWARD Part II

Chapter Eighteen - Page 278AFTERWARD Part III

Chapter Nineteen - Page 286AFTERWARD Part IV

Chapter Twenty - Page 295ART, PROSE & POETRY OF THE4-D SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM

**************************

4 - Contents

Page 6: Total Field Theory

INTRODUCTION

4-D accelerating expansion to macrocosmic infinity.

Copyright 1968 by Masao Komura.Special Effects Copyright 2007 by Austin P. Torney

5 - Contents

Page 7: Total Field Theory

An ensemble of systems. A Hierarchy of multi-moment 4-D space-time surfaces. - K.B.R.

("We cannot visualize such a curved space, because

humanity is not 4-dimensional" - Time-Life Science Series, p. 172)

TOTAL FIELD THEORY - No Space Empty Of Field.

(The statement 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension', includes time & motion)

The Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field (Steady State) Theory.

by K. B. Robertson

"Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended." - Einstein

"There is no space empty of field." - Einstein

"In his novel, THE SEARCH, C.P. Snow describes the reaction of a student in class on hearing the physics professor say he is not sure whether some of the subject matter in the course is right. This indication of disagreement of those inside physics comes as a surprise to the student; he has heard of past scientific controversies, but the current science which he is studying seemed to lack them altogether, as if scientist-authorities backed it up by unanimous vote. 'Science', writes Snow, 'had seemed to be without people or contradictions.' "The knowledge that physics is not as unanimous or bloodless as it may appear from the outside came as a surprise to me also. I wanted to know more..."

- Barbara Lovett Cline, THE MEN WHO MADE A NEW PHYSICS, Preface

“History shows clearly that the advances of science have always been frustrated by the tyrannical influences of certain preconceived notions which were turned in to unassailable dogmas. For that reason

6 - Contents

Page 8: Total Field Theory

alone, every serious scientist should periodically make a profound reexamination of his basic principles.” – Louis de Broglie, NEW PERSPECTIVES IN PHYSICS Speaking at the 2005 Solvay conference David Gross (Nobel laureate) said: "We are in a period of utter confusion...These equations tell us nothing about where space and time come from and describe nothing we would recognize. At best, string theory depicts the way particles might interact in a collection of hypothetical universes...we are missing something fundamental." Excerpts from The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas S. Kuhn, from paragraph 1: "Research is therefore not about discovering the unknown, but rather a strenuous and devoted attempt to force nature into the conceptual boxes supplied by professional education". "In the history of physical science, no published and allegedly 'recognized and acknowledged' scientific theory has been so misinterpreted, and consequently so misunderstood and underestimated as the Special and General Theories of Relativity (1905 - 1916) by Albert Einstein." - K. B. Robertson (KBR) ...........................

7 - Contents

Page 9: Total Field Theory

Abbreviated Reviews "There is nothing new about Newton's Classical Mechanical gravity or

Einstein's 4th dimension of time, except preeminent non-mathematical proof that they are one and the same. The New

Gravity Is The 4th SpaceTime Dimension." - K.B. Robertson, Ibid.

"It's still the same old universe, but gravity is the 4th dimension of that same old universe. I'm grateful for the indelible change in my

perception of it. It may be impossible to overstate the importance of this book. The one, two three and X Y Z of comprehensive infinity."

- Mark Stephen Halfon, Ph.D., Philosophy (*Nassau University), Brooklyn, New York. (*1977 - 2007)

"An ambitious new treatise on the otherwise seasoned subjects of

Space & Time. We are not qualified to evaluate it, but are pleased to see it in this (at that time 'comic book') format." - THE WHOLE

EARTH CATALOGUE, Portola Institute, 1970 - ‘71 "An unprecedented and awesomely credible non-mathematical theory which matter-of-factly proves that gravity is the 4th dimension of time,

then forthwith discovers the previously unrecognized - therefore unidentified - 5th & 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism." - Dr. John Shaw, Chemistry Prof. 1971, University Of California @

Berkeley

"Gravity is The 4th Dimension' - A documentary scientific 'Future Shock'; major conceptual breakthrough. It must be disqualified or formally acknowledged at the foundations of modern theoretical physics; there is no middle ground. So advanced it's simple."

- Mark Vukovic, Electronics Tech, U.S.N. USS Shasta (AE-33), San Francisco, CA.

8 - Contents

Page 10: Total Field Theory

"This book has clearly made a formerly mystified theoretical physics truly comprehensible to anyone with high school reading skills and 'street people' in general. Beyond its overt revolutionary scientific

import, the social implications are also profound. Bound to surprise and constructively influence an enormous number of people for a

very long time. Ignoring or denying it won't make it go away. Now I know what E=MC squared means." - Don Donahue, original printer

and publisher of ZAP Comix, San Francisco "Gravity really is the 4th dimension, and levity and mirth use to be the

5th and 6th dimensions, until K.B. Robertson proved them to be electricity & magnetism, respectively." - Herb Caen, The San

Francisco CHRONICLE

"Not without levity, the sharp shooting author expertly documents his academic and historical subject; then - suddenly - the reader is experientially surrounded by it. There is no intellectual escape from the 4-D space-time continuum anymore, in or out of an ignorant or uninterested yawn. The very act of reading these words is directly

and physically sustained by it. Observing various responses of others, in the early stages of recognizing it, is a recreation in itself.

The informal narrative is a social liberation. The conservative elements don't like it already."

- Sallie Taylor Melinda Bryan, 1979

"Academic L.S.D. in a Stockholm punch bowl, and everybody's invited. Ready or not there is no way out of this but through it. A

scientific Odyssey. The most remarkable fact about 'The New Gravity' is that it was not discovered and written fifty or more years earlier." - Gregory Nageotte, Ph.D. Philosophy, Santa Barbara, CA. 1979

"I am unable to disqualify it."

- Dr. Richard Feynman, 1966, Professor Emeritus, Cal Tech

9 - Contents

Page 11: Total Field Theory

"It reads a hell of a lot more easily and comprehensively than anything else of the subject of Einstein's Relativity. Reads at least as easily as the brass tacks section of any good sci. fi. mag., and it is not

science fiction." - Travis T. Hipp, KSAN radio, San Francisco, 1970

"The old saw, 'There is no gravity, the earth sucks', is no longer

tractable. The New Gravity (Is The 4th space-time Dimension) is the old gravity, in a pushy new paradigm of Einstein's 4 dimensional space-time continuum. Guaranteed to illuminate even the most

diffident mind. It will chancelessly see you and raise you indefinitely. The New Gravity will never let you down." - Arthur Kretchmer, 1979,

Article Editor, PLAYBOY Magazine

“KBR, I have read all of your posts and the entire many posts on the cosmological constant. I agree, much of what you have written is how I also see one interpretation of Einstein’s thinking. You have probably described most of it better than anyone before you, including Einstein himself, yet you have offered little new, to someone like my self, who

long ago figured out Einstein’s thinking, most the same as you.”- Lloyd Gillespie, THEORY OF EVERYTHING Forum, 2007

“Is gravity really the 4th dimension? Or has the author only cleverly built his theory around reality so that no one can tell the difference?”

- K.B. Robertson (RascalPuff)

________________________

10 - Contents

Page 12: Total Field Theory

From: Associate Professor BenTheMan To RascalPuff, 4/18/07

Rascal ---

It is not clear to me that you have done anything but quote

outdated references.

And, to be clear, Newton NEVER based ANYTHING on a graviton. One of the biggest problems Newton had with his own work was that he had no idea concerning what gravity actually

WAS. Sometimes you eat the bahr, and, well, sometimes he eats you.

---Anon

From RascalPuff to BenTheMan:

Dear BenTheMan:

The point of the 'outdated' references is they're retrieved from the trashcan and being put back on the slate. The increasingly desperate big bangers are plundering key features of what was previously abandoned; while continuing on with their bankrupt

(originally presented) 'big bang', which now only vaguely resembles its initial inception and presentation.

Enter (collectively) in google: Cosmological Constant Lambda

Expanding universe big bang acceleration red shift dark energy Friedmann Lemaitre Robertson Walker.

Enter in google: 'Einstein was right after all - maybe'.

11 - Contents

Page 13: Total Field Theory

I am fully aware of: 'The idea that matter can act at a distance across space to

influence other matter is to me so great an absurdity that no man with a competent facility for thinking could ever fall into it'. -

Newton, Paraphrased.

The animus mundi. Newton repeatedly, deliberately and emphatically clarified that

'gravity' was a complete mystery to him.

It is clear that your only respite is the statement of the obvious that you've extended. Thank you for your seasoned views.

--------------------------

http://www.toequest.com/forum/ethics/2840-imitation-compliment-plagiarism-something-else.html

_______________ "There was a young lady named Bright. Who moved much faster than light. She departed one day, in a relative way, and returned

on the previous night." - Eric Buller, 1923 *******************San Francisco City College, Small Theater Auditorium. Greenpeace Benefit(Expanded edition)

* * * * * * * * October 1976

12 - Contents

Page 14: Total Field Theory

Chapter One From Newton to Einstein The Gravitational Alternative

"Not long ago I was kindly admonished that the subject of this evenings' discussion - which is Einstein's 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum - is far too technically specialized and complicated for the majority of most otherwise knowledgeable persons: that, if I ever attempted to lecture it to an open audience, any such attempt would inevitably fail and moreover, quite possibly bore people to sleep. Such talk does not discourage me however; permit me to tell you why.

There's bound to be a few people here tonight, who need to catch up on some sleep. Of the few well intended critics who have made these heavy lidded predictions, none have read my book or attended my lectures. It's their jobs they sleep on. Such relaxed and yawning, recreationally preoccupied forecasts faithfully represent the fashionable response to any proposal that the 4-D space-time continuum can be identified or substantially communicated: without mathematics. Like gravity, the 4th Dimension is formally assigned

13 - Contents

Page 15: Total Field Theory

to non-mathematical incomprehensibility. Hence, any suggestion that the fourth dimension is non-mathematically approachable is immediately evaluated by the knowing as the mark of a rank scientific novice - someone who does not know enough mathematics to understand that the 4th dimension is comprehensively accessible, only to those who do (know enough mathematics). These foregone determinations stem from the fact that there is not even the slightest history of any unsuccessful attempts to non-mathematically identify the 4th Dimension, let alone any successful one. No such accomplishments are anticipated.

The 4th Dimension is correctly equated with time and motion, while formally and consistently relegated to be non-mathematically incomprehensible and even unimaginable. An abstraction on the face of a speculative wrist watch - in those 3-dimensionally timeless words (George Gamow, GRAVITY)... The reason why none of my somnambulant critics - most of them confidentially vanquished physicists and/or Big Bang advocates- (explosive beginners and entropic enders) have

14 - Contents

Page 16: Total Field Theory

troubled themselves with reading or attending my lectures. Hopefully, this accounts for all of the more serious and important matters; so that we may address ourselves, if you will, to all of this allegory insensibility, idle chatter, inane scrawl and/or ranting bombast about gravity being the 4th Dimension.

Gravity is the 4th dimension "That is an unprecedented statement. The only thing gravity and the 4th Dimension are presently recognized to have in common as far as academic physics is concerned, is what is not known about them. Specifically: neither gravity nor the 4th Dimension has ever been non mathematically identified. It is acknowledged that they exist, it is mathematically and elaborately described what they do, but it is not and it has never been comprehended what they are.

On the other hand, it is my intention to generate and popularize only one particularly prominent and inevitable question around the unprecedented statement that Gravity Is the 4th Dimension, and that question is: Didn't we know that before? And, if not: why not?

15 - Contents

Page 17: Total Field Theory

If the statement, 'Gravity is the 4th Dimension' is incorrect, why has it never been disqualified? No one is being asked, neither of course is anyone obliged to accept or believe that gravity is the 4th Dimension. When any one at any time finds this statement seriously credible it is not because I said so, or due to the introduction of a lot of new or ponderous ideas. The statement is found credible when it is revealed and recognized as the inevitable and quite overwhelming import of a wealth of simple, fundamental and familiar facts. Well known but hitherto unrelated facts, which, when related, reveal quite unexpected but equally unavoidable, imminent and overdue; still remarkably unrecognized (and as we shall see, stubbornly and apocryphally denied) conclusions.

Terra Incognita, revisited and Re-Cognized (Here be unslayable Old World dragons): As a place to start, I will cite three facts; the first of which is an excerpt concerning gravity, which is extracted verbatim from the 2nd and 3rd pages of Isaac Newton's three page (non-mathematical) Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA.

16 - Contents

Page 18: Total Field Theory

Then, we will review Albert Einstein's' definition of gravity from his GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY.

Thirdly, we will review the mathematical-geometric definition of dimensions, to determine if and how the definition for physical dimensions relates to Einstein's' renowned 4th Dimension. We will summarily consider if and how the 4th Dimension relates to what Newton and Einstein have independently and formally offered, in the PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA and the GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY respectively, as their two centuries divided considerations of the identity of gravity. Respectfully submitted here, that if you will simply permit presentation of the above subjects, the non-mathematical identity of gravity, and the non-mathematical identity of the 4th Dimension, will be revealed and proven to fulfill the engagement, comprehension and agreement of the majority of intellectual facilities present here this evening. I submit furthermore that this proof will self-explicitly and irrevocably include the statements: GRAVITY IS THE 4TH DIMENSION. ELECTRICITY IS THE 5th DIMENSION. MAGNETISM IS THE 6th DIMENSION;

17 - Contents

Page 19: Total Field Theory

proceeding from there, to find the floundering Big Bang Theory an assemblage of pilfered principles alleged to be abandoned and of no further use to the advancement of science.

Finally, I respectfully submit that the unfolding all of the above proposals will be accomplished in the next approximately seventy minutes (discourse time actual) or less (This dissertation is amplified from the original presentation).

The forthcoming excerpt from Newton's Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA is precluded here with the clarification that, even today, gravity is colloquially thought-of and popularly accepted definitively as a pulling force of attraction; originating at the centers of individual material objects (particles - charges; systems of same); the force of which increases proportionately with increasing mass values. This definition has always been a categorical presumption applied to the unknown identity of gravity, for the sake of convenience and for apparent lack of any other alternative definition.

Newton himself understandably had difficulty accepting the existence of an 'invisible force'

18 - Contents

Page 20: Total Field Theory

which he describes as 'occult', having the power to move apples and planets. Above all, he (very specifically) found - proved - the large force of the orbiting moon directly linked to the same mysterious force applying to the apple's inspiration for falling, above and upon the earth's surface - the aquatic, atmospheric and terrestrial tides; the planets orbiting the sun.

It was formerly thought that gravitational forces acting on earth were much different than forces acting elsewhere in the larger realm of solar system and universe. Newton, established for the first time, that it - the universal realms of the large and small - is all connected by a singular, commonly acting, unidentified invisible force. That is the gist of Newton's discovery - the proven extrapolation of the same force that causes relatively miniscule apples to fall, also causing the orbiting of the relatively enormous planets.

(“The ‘thump’ of a great apple, in the stillness of a crisp October morn - motivated only by the mere necessity of perfect ripeness.” - Hawthorne.)

Newton, finally acknowledged the conditional existence of gravity; only because his own

19 - Contents

Page 21: Total Field Theory

newly invented calculus confirmed that, indeed the same force that motivationally generates falling apples, does likewise generate and sustain the orbits of planets. Yet, as we are about to be reminded, Newton took great care to point out that he did not know or purport to know the identity of gravity, and that his mathematical address to gravity is not concerned with or dependent upon its causal identity, or, its direction...

Newton’s thoughts on ‘the occult (pre ‘Field Physics' recognized) force (Maxwell’s Electromagnetic Field, omni-directionally projecting <in the pattern of a spider-web> at light speed out of all material entities)’:

20 - Contents

Page 22: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

“It is inconceivable, that inanimate brute matter should, without the mediation of something else, which is not material, operate upon, and affect other matter without mutual contact. “And this is one reason why I desired that you would not ascribe inanimate gravity to me. That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter , so that one body may act upon another, at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is

21 - Contents

Page 23: Total Field Theory

to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty for thinking, can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.” - Isaac Newton, On Gravity.

As we shall see, the popular term 'Newtonian concept of attraction (a pulling force)', as applied to gravity, was never unconditionally endorsed by Newton. The concept of gravity as 'a pulling force of attraction' remains a speculative though understandably popular term, coined by Newton's beneficiaries. All of this is to say that the conceptualization of gravity as any sort of pulling force of attraction was not Newton's resolute conceptual or by any means exclusive definition of gravity. Allow the derivation of this last statement to be further qualified:

I wish to cite at this time what is to say the least, a most interesting alternative concept concerning the identity of (what Newton was always careful to call 'universal') gravity. An otherwise completely ignored statement which

22 - Contents

Page 24: Total Field Theory

might even be correctly categorized as 'obscure', or 'inconsequential'. Were it not for the fact that this statement is made by Sir Isaac Newton. And, were it not for the fact that this statement is included in the very (3 page, non-mathematical) Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA.

23 - Contents

Page 25: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

24 - Contents

Page 26: Total Field Theory

From the beginning of the 1st to the end of the 2nd page of Newton's three page Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA, Newton is discussing the motions of falling objects and orbiting planets; by way of his applied mathematical descriptions of the effects of the force of gravity. At this time, Newton offers the following statement about what causes the gravitationally induced motions of planets & apples, quote: Last sentence of first paragraph, verbatim, translated to English from the Latin…

“For I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend on certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other and cohere in regular figures, or, are mutually repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of Nature in vain."

That quote and its extraction will henceforth be referred to here, as THE GRAVITATIONAL ALTERNATIVE. Not my gravitational alternative; Newton's Gravitational Alternative to be exact. I repeat the quote (of particles and systems-of-particles: of matter), 'are

25 - Contents

Page 27: Total Field Theory

either mutually impelled towards each other and cohere in regular figures (orbits; juxtapositions), or, are mutually repelled and recede from each other.' It implies directly and categorically, that gravity may in fact be the opposite of the universally considered impelling or 'pulling force of attraction'; that is to say, Isaac Newton and his formal definitions, directly and resolutely suggest that gravity may in fact be a repelling or pushing force.

It is difficult to over dramatize the very existence of this statement, its author, and especially its contextual implications. It categorically allows that everything Newton mathematically confirms and describes in The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA - from orbiting planets, falling apples, aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric tides - all the large and small phenomena of gravity - is caused by one of two kinds of forces: the conventionally considered impelling or pulling force of attraction, or, its exact opposite, a repelling/ pushing force. That is fact #1.

Fact #1 evokes at least one question: Allowing possible advantage in Newton's Gravitational Alternative that gravity may in

26 - Contents

Page 28: Total Field Theory

fact be a repelling (pushing) force rather than an impelling (pulling) force, how might any such advantage be experienced and applied? That question and its derivation might still be deemed obscure and inconsequential, if its direct unequivocal answer did not exist, most profoundly, at the heart-foundation of the latest and most advanced generalized theory of gravity in the history of Physical Science. That being Albert Einstein's GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY.

In the first quarter of this century, Albert Einstein, in observing the already well known inversely proportional equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass values (which will be explained, shortly), described this equivalence as: 'an astonishing coincidence', and then applied the cause of his astonishment to the monumental task of formulating an unprecedented theoretical generalization concerning the identity of gravity. That, being none other than the General Principle Of Relativity; which principle is quite literally the foundation upon which rests Einstein's entire General Theory of Relativity. The most advanced statement about gravity, to date.

27 - Contents

Page 29: Total Field Theory

The General Principle is also misnomered as the 'Equivalence Hypothesis', or, more appropriately, 'The Principle Of Equivalence', which states: 'There is no way to distinguish the effects produced by the inertial force of acceleration (a pushing/repelling force) from the effects produced by gravitational force (assumed to be a 'pulling/impelling force: identity unknown').

For those already familiar with the General Principle of Relativity that is clear enough. But, to the uninitiated it may sound a bit complicated. Fortunately, there is a simple and excellent demonstration which clarifies the import of this statement. The explanation originally used by Einstein to point out the meaning and implications of the GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY, is since then often utilized by relativist writers and physicists for the same reason. The explanation spoken of here is popularly termed 'the elevator analogy'.

28 - Contents

Page 30: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Illustrations A & B

An elevator car is depicted as falling down the shaft of a very high building after having parted its restraining cables. A group of human passengers perform experiments. They hold out objects and release their grip on them - the objects (cannonballs, bb-shots, pound of butter, wristwatch, etc.) remain suspended in midair; they do not accelerate downward. Because, all of the released objects are falling

29 - Contents

Page 31: Total Field Theory

within and along-with the elevator and its passengers at 32 ft. per-second-per-second (16 ft per second, squared); in accordance with Newton's laws of gravitation (on or of, earth).

The observers in the elevator are unaware of their predicament. They understand and explain the suspension of objects and themselves in mid-air, by presuming they are outside the gravitational influence of the earth, and logically conclude that they are 'free-floating' in deep outer space where there is no significantly measurable force of gravity at all (a *macrocosmic weak force - the opposite of *microcosmic strong nuclear binding force; * generally misperceived as being unrelated; two different kinds of forces. The record proves they are qualitatively the same force, quantitatively occurring in two different - large and small/ tenuously thin and densely compacted - places/coordinate systems)... Refer to Illustration A

It is an apparently sensible conclusion - that they are in a coordinate system which is free-floating in deep space. In leaping from the floor, they float smoothly toward the ceiling with a velocity directly proportional to the vigor

30 - Contents

Page 32: Total Field Theory

of their individual leaps. If/when they push a suspended/floating object in any direction, that object continues to move in a straight line with uniform velocity, until it strikes the wall of the elevator car. Galileo's and Newton's Laws Of Inertia prevail exclusive of gravity, and are obeyed. Newton's Laws of Gravity are pointless to consider in the elevator at this time; because there are no significantly measurable gravitational effects in it, to influence its passengers and their experiments. The environment of the interior elevator is therefore purely and exclusively an inertial system, destitute of gravity and gravitational effects. THERE IS NO WAY FOR THE OBSERVERS INSIDE THE ELEVATOR TO DETERMINE WHETHER THEY ARE FALLING IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD (as they actually are), OR SIMPLY 'FREE-FLOATING' IN THE VOID OF DEEP SPACE, FREE OF ANY GRAVITATIONAL INFLUENCE WHATSOEVER.

Then Einstein alters the situation of the elevator and its passengers. (Refer to Illustration B) This time the experimenting passengers are still in the elevator, but they

31 - Contents

Page 33: Total Field Theory

actually are in the void of deep space, far away from any appreciable gravitational influence. A cable is attached to the roof of the elevator car and an arbitrary force winches-in the cable at 32 feet per-second squared (the descent rate of free falling objects on earth). The elevator is therefore accelerating 'upward' through space (any direction in which the elevator car happens to be pulled by the cable, is 'upward' relative to the passengers within it). Again, the observers within the elevator have no idea where they are, and again they evaluate their situation by performing experiments. Their feet now rest firmly on the floor; they now have their 'normal' (as experienced on earth) body weight to support. Confirmed by scaled weight measurement (The observers are actually measuring and obtaining inert mass values; not realizing they are not measuring gravitational mass values): their coordinate system having found the two values identical under the accelerating circumstances; indistinguishable from each other.

Inertial & Gravitational Mass Values; which are not supposed to have anything to do with each other, are likewise indistinguishable at

this *juncture; which Einstein called

32 - Contents

Page 34: Total Field Theory

*’astonishing’ - the *coincidental confluence of two different methods of measuring and

defining mass value; arriving at exactly the same - unrelated coordinates. *A pound of

butter offers exactly a pound of resistance to acceleration: when the acceleration exactly -

and 'coincidentally' - equals the descent rate of objects in free-fall @ 32' per second squared,

on earth.

When the passenger’s in Einstein’s elevator jump, they do not float to the ceiling because the floor is constantly accelerating upward beneath them at the descent-rate for free-falling objects on earth. When the observers and various objects are weighed on a standard scale within the elevator at this time, they all have their 'normal' earth-weight (heavy mass value ); due to their resistance - generated by physical matter - negative inertia: the tendency of all bodies at rest to remain at rest and offer resistance to outside forces acting upon them, including non-uniform motion. That is to say: inert mass value , opposing the acceleration (non-uniform motion) of the elevator floor.

If the elevator were accelerating at less than 32 ft. per-second, the objects and observers

33 - Contents

Page 35: Total Field Theory

would weigh correspondingly less than their normal earth weight. If the elevator were accelerating at more than 32 ft. per-second, the objects and observers would weigh correspondingly more than their normal earth weight. When the observers in the test elevator release objects from their grip, the objects appear to descend vertically - 'fall'/accelerate-'downward' @ 32 ft. per-second (per second). When objects are tossed or pushed in a horizontal direction, those objects do not move in a straight line in accordance with the laws of inertia; instead the paths of the tossed objects - due to the acceleration of the elevator car - describe a parabolic curve; descending vertically at 32 feet per second squared, relative to the floor; in accordance with the laws of gravitation. The observers remain unaware that their room is accelerating (ascending ever-faster) through deep space. They understandably conclude from direct experience and experimentation, that they are situated in quite ordinary circumstances in a windowless room on earth, influenced by conventional gravity.

THERE IS NO WAY FOR THE OBSERVERS TO DETERMINE FROM WITHIN THE ELEVATOR

34 - Contents

Page 36: Total Field Theory

(coordinate system) WHETHER THEY ARE AT REST IN THE EARTH'S GRAVITATIONAL FIELD; WHERE ALL OBJECTS ARE 'PULLED' DOWNWARD @ 32 ft. per-second BY GRAVITY, or: WHETHER THEY ARE ACCELERATING IN AN INERTIAL SYSTEM (which they are in this case, @ 32 ft. per-second squared): WHERE THERE IS NO GRAVITY WHATSOEVER.

From his imaginative and now renowned 'elevator analogy', Einstein formulated a conclusion of unprecedented theoretical importance; that being: The General Principle of Relativity: THERE IS NO WAY TO DISTINGUISH THE MOTION PRODUCED BY INERTIAL FORCES (acceleration/ centrifugal and centripetal force), FROM MOTION PRODUCED BY GRAVITATIONAL FORCE. This is the General Principle of Relativity. Fact #2.

It borders on being a statement of the obvious, but we are about to see that sometimes it isn't so obvious at all. That people in general everywhere, actively refuse to recognize it, altogether - the greatest problem - and the most importantly unrecognized solution - in science, since 1916.

35 - Contents

Page 37: Total Field Theory

It is particularly noteworthy, because the Classical and Contemporary popular concept of UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION remains, that is to say, continues to be, a 'pulling force of attraction'. Yet, here we find Contemporary Theoretical Physics - specifically Einstein's General Theory of Relativity - equating gravity with acceleration as - and which is - a 'pushing or repelling force'. That is to say, in 1686, Newton categorically and formally allowed that gravity 'may be' in fact a repelling force. Then, in 1916, we have Einstein's General Principle of Relativity equating gravity with acceleration, which is, once again, a repelling force. What I call: Newton's Gravitational Alternative - and Einstein's General Theory; on the same table. Historically 220 years apart. Lightning struck in the same place - ominously joined, since the resiliently unrecognized and stubbornly unattended opportunity afforded, in The (Einstein's) General Theory, of 1916.

36 - Contents

Page 38: Total Field Theory

Isaac's apple in Albert's elevator

F=GMM____________

r squared

Special Effects by Austin Torney Illustration copyright 1969 - 2007 by K.B.Robertson

Again, this elicits a question: If we are to seriously consider gravity as a repelling force, how might it be meaningfully construed as such? That is to say, how do we apply Newton's Gravitational Alternative, combined with Einstein's General Principle, to correspond with the anthropomorphic Gravitational Experience?

We will return to this question and its answer by way of a brief comparative investigation of

37 - Contents

Page 39: Total Field Theory

what relationship if any exists between Einstein's concept of gravity, derived from the General Theory of Relativity, and Einstein's concept of the 4th Dimension, which is also, as we shall see, more than coincidentally derived from the General Theory of Relativity.

A brief review the definition of dimensions as applied to the three recognized dimensions of space, follows. Let it be qualified firstly that, in colloquial language, the term 'dimensions' may be correctly applied to any number of descriptions, such as 'dimensions' of music or thought or color for example. But, in physics there is only one definition for dimensions, which we will reconsider, immediately after the following statement concerning contemporary academic physics and its representative posturing toward the subject of the (Einstein's) allegedly 'acknowledged' *4th Dimension (*of 'time and motion'). Mathematicians and physicists are of the consensus agreement that, when the definition of the 4th Dimension is applied to Reality-At-Large as Einstein proved it is in fact, then one automatically departs the realm of conscious experience and comprehensibility. This is the reason for example, that in one renowned case the

38 - Contents

Page 40: Total Field Theory

reputedly omniscient, ever-present yet conceptually elusive 4th Dimension was professionally referenced as, 'a mathematical abstraction on anyone's wrist-watch'.

This is also the reason the 4th Dimension is a favorite conscript among science fiction writers and metaphysicists. There is unflappable security in speculations and improvisations of a subject, about which there is no recognized non-mathematical comprehension; no recognized absolutes or authorities (when the allegory expert falsely emerges everywhere, waxing of discovery, while claiming his subject is functionally unfindable). A haven for befuddled academic refugees: a jingoistic proving ground that endorses (and/or ambivalently disqualifies) everything and/or anything; according to the needs of the sometimes desperately ignorant, pretentious, scientifically name-saked 'authorities' and historical revisionists. Innocent ignorance is exonerated in this consideration.

No discourse on the 4th Dimension, whether physics or science fiction, would be complete without directly suggesting that it is 'unimaginable', or, 'incomprehensible', or 'something else', or 'someplace else' ('far out').

39 - Contents

Page 41: Total Field Theory

Yet, it is agreed that the 4th Dimension is 'time & motion'; somehow integrally combined with the 3 recognized Dimensions of Space; existing always and everywhere. Therefore we need very little imagination or faith in Einstein, to know that we are perpetually witnessing and experiencing the 4th Dimension, in simply being conscious of the reality we are part of; by which we are constantly surrounded. We can correctly go one step further. We can be confident that the 4th Dimension has been, and continues to be overlooked. That is, we can know that some very fundamental constituent or phenomenon of reality - with which we are all familiar, but which has yet to be recognized, is the 4th Dimension - the 4-Dimensional space-time continuum to be exact.

Today's physical scientists tell us that 'the 4th Dimension is time and motion'. They say this because they know Einstein proved it mathematically. But it is not a non-mathematically satisfactory answer, because it does not contribute to any further comprehension of what the 4th Dimension is, relative to the colloquial 3-Dimensional Experience. Time and Motion are measurable

40 - Contents

Page 42: Total Field Theory

and comprehensible in Three Dimensions. Why not in 4? What is it about proven and measured 4-dimensional reality that has not been recognized? Why has it not been recognized?

NOTE: All of the below authorities proclaim that the 4th Dimension is non-mathematically 'incomprehensible', even 'unimaginable'.

Readers are cautioned against concluding that these authorities are right, and encouraged to read the accompanying discourse, and draw their own non-mathematically facilitated conclusions.

"In 1916, Albert Einstein published his General Relativity, a mathematical theory of gravitation which replaced Newtonian concepts with abstractions so difficult that it took a decade even for most mathematicians to grasp them. The essence of Einstein's theory was that the presence of matter distorts space and makes it curve. The concept of space curvature stemmed from many dimensional, non-straight-line geometry created abstractly through equations. Just as a surface can curve in ordinary 3-Dimensional space, so in non-

41 - Contents

Page 43: Total Field Theory

Euclidean geometry a 3-Dimensional space can itself curve in 4-dimensional space. No one can visualize such a curved space because humanity is not 4-Dimensional..." - LIFE Science Library, THE UNIVERSE, p. 179

"When events occur in 3-Dimensional Space it is not possible to draw an actual graph of 4-Dimensional space-time, but mathematicians have ways of handling such graphs without actually drawing them." - Martin Gardner, RELATIVITY FOR THE MILLION, p. 98

"The 4-Dimensional world of relativistic physics is the world where force and matter are unified; where matter can appear as discontinuous particles or as a continuous field. In these cases, however, we can no longer visualize the unity very well. Physicists can 'experience' the 4-Dimensional space-time world throughout the abstract mathematical formalism of their theories, but their visual imaginations - like everybody else's - is limited to the 3-Dimensional world of the senses. Our language and thought patterns have evolved in this 3-Dimensional world and therefore we find it extremely hard to deal with the 4-

42 - Contents

Page 44: Total Field Theory

Dimensional reality of Relativistic Physics." - Fritjov Capra, THE TAO OF PHYSICS, P 150

"This concept is very difficult to visualize. It is a consequence of the 4-Dimensional space-time character of the sub-atomic world and neither our intuition nor our language can deal with this image very well." - Capra, THE TAO OF PHYSICS, p. 80

"In the General Theory of Relativity, the framework of the Special Theory is extended to include gravity. The effect of gravity, according to General Relativity, is to make space-time curved. This, again, is extremely hard to imagine. We can easily imagine a 3-Dimensionally curved surface, such as the surface of an egg. The meaning of the word 'curvature' for 2-Dimensional curved surfaces is thus quite clear; but when it comes to 3-Dimensional space - let alone 4-Dimensional space-time - our imagination abandons us. Since we cannot look at 3-Dimensional space 'from outside', we cannot imagine how it could be 'bent' in some direction." - Ibid, p. 173

"The reader is cautioned against concluding that time is an additional physical dimension in

43 - Contents

Page 45: Total Field Theory

the sense that it can be seen and felt like a material object. No one in our universe can see in 4 Dimensions or more because of the way our universe is constructed." - James A. Coleman, RELATIVITY FOR THE LAYMAN, p. 69

Chapter Two THE 4-DIMENSIONAL REPRISE

The mathematical definition for the 4th Dimension is also the geometric definition. In order to consider the geometric definition for the 4th Dimension we will first review the singularly scientific and formal definition for the Three recognized Dimensions of Space. Then we will consider the 4th Dimension's relationship if any, to Einstein's General Principle of Relativity and/or Newton's Gravitational Alternative. ( Refer to Illustrations 1 & 2)

The (only known; geometric; metrically spatial) definition for physical dimensions, begins with no dimensions whatsoever - specifically a geometric point. We will call it 'point zero ('0'). Any motion of point '0' will inevitably be at right angles from itself, and,

44 - Contents

Page 46: Total Field Theory

any motion, at any speed, for any length of time, generates a One Dimensional Straight Line 'O' - 'A', of arbitrary length.

It cannot be a curved line yet, because it has no dimension(s) to curve into. It may become a longer or shorter One Dimensional Straight Line, but it cannot change its dimensional quality until it moves at right angles (90 degrees, perpendicular) from itself (again). Then it generates a Two Dimensional Plane 'A'- 'B'. When a Two Dimensional Plane ('A'-'B') moves at right angles to itself (yet a third time), it generates a Space and/or Solid 'B'-'C' of Three Dimensions. (Picture a line-drawn cube; progressively generated from 0 dimensions to 3-Dimensions: by the right angle extrapolation of the geometric point 0, to 0-A, generating a One Dimensional Straight Line <0------->A>. The Straight Line 0-A then moving at right angles to itself, generating A-B Two Dimensional Plane. The Two Dimensional Plane A-B moving at right angles to itself B-C; generating a Three Dimensional Solid, occupied or occupiable-by 3-dimensional matter). The rule here is the right angle/perpendicular projection of each dimension from out of the preceding dimension. This is how physical

45 - Contents

Page 47: Total Field Theory

dimensions are generated, hence, this is their singular physical and philological definition.

That leaves us here and now with the conceptual-geometric credentials to contemplate the three recognizable Dimensions of Space occupied - or occupiable - by matter; familiar enough concept; by-way of its Universal physical-conditional manifestation in the entire reception of physical-sensory, instrumental and therefore psychological-conceptual human experience (at large). Knowing; not speculating, that we are obliged by the laws of geometry, combined with Einstein's (allegedly 'acknowledged') proof that the entire physical Universe is 4-Dimensional: not merely to 'consider', but to find, observe and experience the physical as well as spatial Three Dimensions of Space moving at right angles from themselves. This is not a mere idea, or consideration, or project; it is an ultimatum: THE 4-DIMENSIONAL ULTIMATUM. Because, it demands without ambiguity or equivocation, that the entire recognized physical 3-Dimensional Universe of Space and Matter, must be and is moving at right angles from itself in one of two possible 4-Dimensional directions: that of overall 4-

46 - Contents

Page 48: Total Field Theory

Dimensional contraction, where everything recognizable as 3-Dimensional, is constantly growing smaller (moving at right angles from all three of it's recognized dimensions)...

Or, the direction of overall 4-Dimensional expansion, where everything recognizable as 3-Dimensional, is constantly growing larger (moving at right angles, constantly, to all three of its recognized dimensional coordinates).

Do we see or measure - do we recognize - 3-Dimensional reality as moving at right angles from itself; shrinking ever-smaller with 4-Dimensional contraction, or, growing ever-larger with 4-Dimensional expansion?

The unanimous and seemingly inevitable answer to this (apparently absurd and pointless) question, since Einstein required it, has uniformly been (as will be *documented, shortly), *“No, we do not observe or measure 3-Dimensional reality as 4-Dimensional. Obviously matter is not expanding. If the universe is made up of a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely."

47 - Contents

Page 49: Total Field Theory

48 - Contents

Page 50: Total Field Theory

Furthermore, it is uniformly agreed, we cannot measure, comprehend, or even imagine the 4th Dimension; nor will we ever. The 4th Dimension is declared to be non-mathematically incomprehensible; descriptively inaccessible without a mathematically encrypted frame of reference. (Refer, the half dozen mistaken quotes from authorities, at the back cover of this book.) The Three recognized Dimensions Of Space must move at right angles from themselves - that is to say, expand or contract, in order to fulfill the only definition there is for any geometric or mathematical consideration of - or address to - a physically prevailing 4th Dimension...

49 - Contents

Page 51: Total Field Theory

Of which, in the meantime, prevails ubiquitously: we are abundantly reassured that Einstein left no doubt. Probably safe to presume that some of you who are not snoozing, already have more than a vague idea of what's next, and if so - you're quite right of course. The resolve is exactly as simple as it is inescapable. Einstein's GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY equates gravity with acceleration. Einstein's 4th Dimension demands overall right-angle motion of the Three recognized Dimensions of Space: in one of two possible 4-Dimensional directions (Overall expansion or overall contraction). Since objects do not fall 'upward' and away from 3-D Matter, this rules out overall 4-Dimensional contraction. Objects do fall 'downward' toward the center of 3-D Matter; therefore (as is): a physically (materially) expanding Universe. identity (the source) of the observed, measured, acknowledged, recognized spatially expanding universe.

50 - Contents

Page 52: Total Field Theory

The conclusion is without precedent - although it has many historically noted revolutionary counterparts and parallels, in the history of Western Science. Recognizing the four dimensional space time continuum as being gravity, and conversely, is and has been patently unavoidable since its remarkably progressive advent; for the reasons provided herein (Refer to Illustrations 3 & 4)

The material as well as spatial Universe is 4-Dimensionally expanding; it is this 4-Dimensional accelerating expansion that generates the force experienced and recognized as gravity. Hence objects do not fall to earth; the earth - instead - accelerates

51 - Contents

Page 53: Total Field Theory

upwardly and overtakes them (just as the floor does in Einstein's elevator).

Gravity is the 4-D space-time Dimension.

If anyone asks or demands from this point onward, that this statement must or need be proven, they are reminded that this has already been accomplished, by Einstein, and Newton, and the laws of mathematics and geometry; at - by definition - their most fundamental, physically definitive level. We have simply taken Einstein's renowned accomplishments and recommendations seriously enough to actually apply-them-to and recognize-them-within, the human Gravitational Experience.

The Question is no longer, 'What & Where is the 4th Dimension in my own experience?' Einstein proved that it is time and motion; applicable to: Everything; Everywhere. The Question regarding the 4th D. is: 'What & Where is it not?'

"I feel sure we have to return to the program which may be described properly as the Maxwellian - namely the description of physical reality in terms of fields without particles."

52 - Contents

Page 54: Total Field Theory

- Albert Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 270

The challenge is no longer to prove that matter is an ever expanding field and that gravity is consequently the 4-D space-time dimension. The challenge is to prove that this is not the ongoing universal reality as we perpetually experience and witness it - all of the observed, experienced and audible effects of gravity as we know it; without previous recognition.

Approximately forty-five minutes remain of the allotted time to prove that gravity is the 4-D space-time Dimension. I respectfully submit, that; if you will permit me to do so, I will prove that gravity is the 4th Dimension, nine more times in the remainder of the allotted seventy minutes.

Past Is Prologue (Study History). Gravity is the 4th space-time Dimension because physical matter itself is 4-Dimensional. As Einstein proved and the institution of academic physics (presently insists - while simultaneously refusing to recognize it) acknowledged sixty-five years and five months ago (as of 10/'76 when this discourse was publicly delivered).

53 - Contents

Page 55: Total Field Theory

This means literally, that we are able to make a seemingly absurd prediction with complete confidence that it is not absurd - or even a prediction - at all, but rather an inevitability. That inevitability being that the fundamental material constituents of all apparently solid Universal Matter, i.e., neutrons, protons electrons and all other so-called 'sub-atomic particles', are not 3-Dimensionally static solids - billiard ball like 'particles' - at all, but rather, surfaceless electromagnetic charges without distinct boundaries: 4-Dimensionally accelerating fields - projecting/extending the previously unidentified 5th & 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism respectively, as we shall soon discover; forthwith.

Presently, we will consider further proof that physical, corporeal matter is a perpetually expanding, accelerating field...

Introducing an abbreviated but entirely accurate description of yet another proven and still unrecognized fact, furthermore and categorically confirming that Matter is 4-Dimensionally expanding. The most popular sources include a renowned book on physics written by the late and eminent journalist-

54 - Contents

Page 56: Total Field Theory

mathematician, J.W.N. Sullivan. It is very appropriately entitled, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE. On pages 100 and 101 of the hard cover edition of that title, the author is describing an experiment and discovery (entailing the controlled *bombardment of singular-atomic-thickness Gold plates/ filaments; *with subatomic particles – imparting concentric circles on the gold sheets); originally fulfilled by physicist, G.P. Thompson (Incidentally, G.P. Thompson is not to be confused with his father, J. J. Thompson who was the discoverer of the electron some decades earlier).

What G.P. Thompson did in 1937, when technology finally permitted him to be the first to access and measurably record the sub atomic/microcosmic realm of so-called 'particles (electrons, protons, neutrons; et al - sub-atomic particles)', was to overtly and experimentally discover and mathematically and repeatedly re-confirm that the ultimate physical constituents of matter - that is, neutrons, protons, and electrons - are not reducible to the anticipated microcosmic, 3-dimensional ‘particles’ having specifically defined boundary-surfaces; discontinuous from

55 - Contents

Page 57: Total Field Theory

surrounding space. Instead, G.P. Thompson, discovered that neutrons, protons and electrons are microcosmic charges of undulating electric field energy - 'charges' ('disturbed areas'), having no definite boundary surfaces whatsoever separating them from their surrounding space. The immediate below illustrations are excerpted from Geoff Haselhurst's Wave Structure of Matter Two Dimensional Cross Section of spherical standing wave.(Interior becomes increasingly more dense with approach to center, squared to microcosmic infinity. - K. B. Robertson 5/18/07 Re: 'Wavicle')

+ = This diagram shows how the In-Waves and Out-Waves form a Standing Wave around the Wave-Center 'particle' _______________________________________________________ http://www.spaceandmotion.com/help/introduction-physics-philosophy-metaphysics-space.htm

56 - Contents

Page 58: Total Field Theory

Because of the outcome of G.P. Thompson's original experiment and many other related experiments since then, physical science today formally recognizes, acknowledges, and categorically states, that two or more physical entities - be they individual neutrons, protons or electrons, or billiard balls in collision, or juggernauts moving in opposite directions at 90 miles per hour and colliding head-on: do not actually touch or contact one another.

The subjective term touch', and even the objective term 'contact' directly imply and require one surface meeting another surface.

Of course, for all subjective purposes in the human experience, the terms 'touch' and 'contact' are entirely acceptable. We observe that apparently solid 3-Dimensional substance has apparently discontinuous surfaces, therefore we intelligently - but in this case incorrectly - assume that all solid material substance including that of our own bodies, is ultimately constituted-of and reducible-to solid 3-D particles; also having specifically defined surface-boundaries, discontinuous from surrounding space. G.P. Thompson's original

57 - Contents

Page 59: Total Field Theory

discovery that there are only charges of electricity which somehow influence each other at-a-distance-across space, evoked the following commentary from Lord Bertrand Russell: "No two particles of matter ever come into *contact. When they get too close, they move off".- p.126 THE ABC OF RELATIVITY.

(Refer to illustration 7. Two charges/particles; in mutually oppositional collision. There is no ‘surface contact’.)

58 - Contents

Page 60: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

All of this is to review and clarify the context in which it is an observed and acknowledged physical fact that no two or more physical entities ever actually touch or contact each other. The conclusion of 'touching', or 'contacting' is reached by way of the field produced by atomic and sub-atomic structures - which Thompson refers to as 'disturbed areas' - a physical constituent of those structures. Although it is proven that any two or more material systems never actually contact each other, it is invariably observed and agreed that they do have, to say the least, an 'influence' on one another. Which influence must, because they do not touch or contact, be attributed to conflicting field forces.

"There is no such thing as space 'empty of field'. Space-time does not claim existence on its own, but only as a structural quality of the field". - Albert Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 375

For this reason, any answer to any question or consideration of whether or not two or more bodies touch, is entirely dependent upon the popular as well as literal interpretation of what is actually meant or circumspectly intended - in

59 - Contents

Page 61: Total Field Theory

what qualified context - by and in the practiced; applied terms: 'Matter' and/or 'physicality'. Discontinuity is, as a concept, displacing continuity; where the latter manifests in patently measured reality. A political coup in theoretical physics - Nobel Prize material in the Quick-Fix department of hasty discoveries. A series of historically obscure quick fixes (little denials), culminating into what only now emerges as a major oversight, if not cover-up. A Real Sign of the Virtually Artificial ('L.H. Oswald acted alone') Times ('JFK shot himself').

Ostensibly, contemporary physics refuses to acknowledge or term an energetic field entity, Matter (instead, grotesquely calling it an 'unstable; disturbed area'), even though that field entity disallows the simultaneous occupation of its space by any other field entity. That is to say summarily, two qualities observed of field entities are quite literally the formal definition of matter. That definition being: 'That which possesses inertia and occupationally demands 3-Dimensions of Space'.

That is Fact #3. There is still more to this.

60 - Contents

Page 62: Total Field Theory

Sullivan comments furthermore on pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE: "These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely."

Holy Smokes! The church is on fire? Thompson (as described by Sullivan, Ibid.), repeatedly checks the experiment and its mathematical confirmation; repeatedly gets the same results, and then dismisses the entire finding…

Perished the disturbing thought; before it spread indefinitely. Along with everything else that couldn't possibly be expanding - even though he just proved otherwise. Rescued the physical universe from 4 dimensional expansion. Been keeping General Relativity's most famous dimension, motionlessly suspended in three static, tenaciously non-expanding, glazed & permafrosted dimensions, ever since.

61 - Contents

Page 63: Total Field Theory

Chapter ThreeOBVIOUSLY MATTER IS NOT EXPANDING

'TIME Magazine’s Man of the Century': Einstein's 4-D universe is not an option in today's academia. Banned from the classroom. Why? Because it can't - mustn't - be where it is: everywhere.

The entire (perpetually ignored or actively dismissed) finding is Albert Einstein's allegedly 'immeasurable' and 'incomprehensible' 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum. The physically (spatially and materially) expanding universe...

What is happening here and ever since, is, G.P. Thompson, with J.W.N. Sullivan and the entire scientific community looking over his shoulder, is opting to subjectively over-rule and contradict the objectively proven and demonstrated, prevailing conditional reality, on the now very familiar and equally over-employed and foregone premise that it subjectively appears 'obvious' that Physical Reality-At-Large 'is not' (4-Dimensionally) expanding.

That is to say, Thompson did not simply fail to recognize and acknowledge the direct

62 - Contents

Page 64: Total Field Theory

implications of his discovery. He, and J.W.N. Sullivan refused, and all physicists since then continue to refuse to recognize and acknowledge its meaning and its abundantly measurable, observable, even prosaically *audible manifestations. (The very *sound of 4-D gravity is revealed, before this dissertation closes.) This is contrary to scientific method. And, Sullivan is not through, yet... I won't blame any who may not believe this next quote. I don't believe it either, and it's on pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE. Author, J.W.N. Sullivan, summarily endorses Thompson's dismissal of the experimental results (2+2 must equal 5). "As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be misled into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper

63 - Contents

Page 65: Total Field Theory

interpretation." - Pages 103 & 104 of THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, by J.W.N. Sullivan Here's a portion of a google obtained, 1993 review, by Maura Flannery:I'd like to discuss a book that I first saw on the bookshelf of a colleague. It's a paperback called The Limitations of Science by J.W.N. Sullivan. It's a 1963 reprint (New York: Mentor) of a book which originally appeared in 1933. It caught my eye because I had read another book by Sullivan, the second volume in the series called Aspects of Science (New York: Knopf, 1926). I really enjoyed it, and so I considered borrowing Limitations, but never got around to it. When I came across it in a used bookstore in Madison, Wisconsin (which is full of bookstores) at $1.50, I couldn't resist. On the back cover, Sullivan is described as "a mathematician, philosopher, and musician, who was called at his death by TIME magazine, 'one of the world's four or five most brilliant interpreters of physics to the world of common men.' I had never heard of him until I read an article on the beauty of physics by S. Chandrasekhar, who quotes Sullivan (Physics Today, 32 [1979], p.25). Since I'm interested in the aesthetics of science, I followed up on the quote and came to Aspects of Science, which is a collection of essays. I enjoyed it because Sullivan was saying in 1926 many things which I think still need saying today: that science is an exciting, passionate occupation that is it more than laws and facts presented in a dry form.

“These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely." – Sullivan, Ibid (Indeed it has, and so it will continue, maintaining the same relatively uniform density, from one moment to the next, ad infinitum - yesterday's square mile is much smaller and more dense than today's, and today's is much smaller and more dense than tomorrow's; squared. All frames of reference

64 - Contents

Page 66: Total Field Theory

remaining relatively equal; the infinitely small being no less endless and dense than the infinitely large is endlessly more thin and tenuous... Electromagnetic gravity is relatively stronger in the comparative earlier moments and relatively weaker in the comparative later moments of the continuous universal expansion. The value of time also varies, corresponding with the value of space it occurs in. More will be said about this, later.)

That is fact #4. (How they do carry on.) ‘Extremely Difficult To Avoid Unstable Disturbed Areas in The Recent, Profoundly Disconcerting History Of Science, Which Have Yet To Receive Their Proper Interpretation.’

Continued: P.D. Ouspensky, has the same kind of trouble in his NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE. An entire chapter entitled, The 4th Dimension. P.D. Ouspensky sets an awkward, out of character example of being so near and yet so far... “It is difficult to describe even approximately the significance which the discovery of the 4th perpendicular in our Universe would have for our knowledge. The conquest of the air.

65 - Contents

Page 67: Total Field Theory

Hearing and seeing at a distance establishing connections with other planets (How about if we start with establishing connections on this planet?) or with other solar systems; all of this is nothing compared with the discovery of a new dimension.” (What about the 4th dimension of space-time-gravity, the 5th of electricity, the 6th of magnetism? How much less are all those projected ‘nothings’, compared with this ensemble of newly discovered physical dimensions?)

Ouspensky continues: “But so far it ('the discovery of a new dimension') has not been made."

What We Must Do: “We must recognize that we are helpless before the riddle of the 4th dimension, and we must try to examine the problem within the limits accessible to us.” - P.D. Ouspensky, Chapter: THE 4TH DIMENSION, in the title: A NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE. p. 68 (*With all due respect, sir: How about a drop in the bucket?

66 - Contents

Page 68: Total Field Theory

+ = This rough diagram shows how the In-Waves and Out-Waves form a Standing Wave around the Wave-Center 'particle'. - Geoff Haselhurst

All the answers are there, looking up at the observer - ut infra, ut supra - not caring a ripple if the answers therein are recognized or not... The specific import of this statement will be clarified with the progression of this report.)

“The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible.” - Albert Einstein, IN SCHLIPP (1949) p. 112

For an even more detailed documentary of the remarkably employed Art of Missing The 4-Dimensional Point, refer pages 69 thru 97 in P.D. Ouspensky’s A NEW MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE. This is a very well written and illustrated book and chapter (The 4th Dimension), by a deservedly esteemed and dedicated author - well worth reading. Ouspensky exemplifies and dramatizes the standard refusal to recognize what is a proven - over-ruling result of objective experiment and mathematics with subjective misunderstandings.

67 - Contents

Page 69: Total Field Theory

How 'misled we can be into thinking that waves are physical realities.' Whereas, physical reality at large is ‘obviously not expanding.’ 'Clarifying' that all experimental proofs of the expansion of the physical universe at large - what is unanimously encountered and uniformly denied here - are merely 'mathematical phantoms.' The 'profound disconcertion' being that there's something here that isn't being recognized, and we (formally recognized scientists) apprehend that someone is going to run into it (provide the illusory ‘phantom’ with its so far rejected and actively denied, long belated 'proper interpretation', and non-mathematically make it conceptually accessible to everyone), before we do (Boo?).

‘We could be misled into thinking’...

Readers may draw their own conclusions, regarding the meaning and import of Buckminster Fuller's below quoted statement, regarding the geometrically considered 4th dimension (which is usually represented by a graphic illustration of a cube, or 'super/hyper-cube', and which in fact, as Fuller clarifies,

68 - Contents

Page 70: Total Field Theory

may be represented by any shape whatsoever...).

"In reality, mathematics can say very little about the 4th dimension. There is nothing in the hypothesis of the 4th dimension that would make it inadmissable from a mathematical point of view, this hypothesis does not contradict any of the accepted axioms and, because of this, does not meet with particular opposition on the part of mathematics. Mathematicians even admit the possibility of establishing the relationship that should exist between 3-D and 4-D space, i.e., certain properties of the 4th Dimension. But they do all this in a very general and indefinite form. No exact definition of the 4th Dimension exists in mathematics...

"The basis of the denial of the fourth dimension, which has been supported by the theoretical and fallacious plane and cubical geometry, has been the inability to produce an additional or fourth perpendicular to a cube, as the basis of an additional power multiplication, whereas, poor little plane arithmetic and algebra, without geometrical reference, being abstract, indicate the perfect ability to do so...

69 - Contents

Page 71: Total Field Theory

"Very rightly do they do so, for if the geometrist will go back to his first perpendicular, he will find it perpendicular to a sphere, for did he not assume a dot as his first basis of a geometrical theorem, which if conceded at all, must be spheroidal. Matter, if existent at all (and we cannot fallaciously assume a truth that is not), must be spheroidal. Surely the 'PlaneAndSolid' geometrist does not claim his 'dot' or 'point' to be cubical, for then he would have no further cause for his progressive antics.

70 - Contents

Page 72: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

We see that there is no cubism, and that we can have as many perpendiculars to the inside or outside of the sphere as we may wish. Each power raising, or root taking, is on the basis of spheroidal increase or decrease by that many units of its radial or time dimension. The only 'straight line' then is the radial or time line, demonstrated by spheroidal dissection on its radial axis. There is also much laughter at the

71 - Contents

Page 73: Total Field Theory

'Plane&Solids'" - R. Buckminster Fuller, 4-D TIMELOCK, p. 17

Apparently, what Fuller is qualifying, is that, although a geometric point does not exist, it is not square, it is round. Otherwise the motion of the square point A, to generate a Straight Line A --->B, begins a sequence of unnatural cubism, proceeding all the way up to the 4-D 'supercube'.

Fuller seems to be reminding us that the perpendicular - right angle - Euclidian law of (the extrapolation of) dimensions, can and does proceed from any shape at all; the three recognized dimensions of space being 4 dimensional and of a quasi infinite number of shapes and sizes. The reader is encouraged to look up Buckminster Fuller in 'Who's Who'? The majority of entries have a few paragraphs of fine print - whereas Fuller's achievements fill the page. He is not a man to be underestimated.

How ‘Indefinitely Spreadable’ It Is... George Gamow, in one mighty peculiar paragrah, shows us what's wrong with Einstein's Cosmological contribution.

72 - Contents

Page 74: Total Field Theory

"Einstein's Cosmological Constant is unstable, and might *start expanding or contracting at the slightest provocation." - George Gamow, THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE, p. 26(((Say When?))) Refer: As You (Squarely) Like It, by William Shakespeare.

Dear George Gamow: Please do let us know when and where it *stops.

( Here it comes again.)

4-D MassField Doppler Effect Consider the physical definition of an expanding field. The singular definition for all expanding field systems is: A measurable and definable area or system of or within space, which is inherently and constantly growing larger (or smaller). Such definable field areas of space may have any number of dissimilarities. But all manifestations of expanding field energy have in common one inevitable characteristic.

Consider the comparative relationship of two otherwise totally unrelated fields. Specifically, we will compare the qualities of an expanding

73 - Contents

Page 75: Total Field Theory

field of sound with that of an expanding field of electromagnetism - which is light.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

If these sound waves were light, it would be shifted toward red, from a receding source, and shifted toward blue, with an approaching source.

In the example of a field of sound, consider a simple mechanical alarm clock which is ringing, but not otherwise moving relative to an observer. The innermost circle represents the outside diameter of the alarm clock itself; of course the concentricity's emanating from center - the ringing alarm clock - represent the systematic structure of sound waves projecting omni-directionally from it. In the case of sound, the field is expanding from the alarm clock @ slightly less than 1,100 ft. per-second. Note, that the sound-Field system which is circumscribed by and contained within the area encompassed by the outermost (largest; oldest) sound wave is completely symmetrical (illustration 5); that is to say, it has the same

74 - Contents

Page 76: Total Field Theory

uniform structure in any direction from the center-source and throughout all of its parts.

Now consider the above diagram of a ringing alarm clock as a source of light, rather than sound. Whereas, light does not require a conducting medium to support its motion through space from its source, and sound does, and, whereas light moves at 186,282 miles-per-second as compared to the 1,100 foot seconds of sound. Nevertheless, what these two comparatively considered fields do have in common becomes graphically evident when either or both of them are in motion relative to an observer. That commonalty is a well known phenomenon, originally discovered in the mid-1800's by the Austrian physicist, Christian J. Doppler. This phenomenon is acknowledged to be invariably characteristic of all expanding fields. It is called 'Doppler effect', or sometimes 'Doppler shift/ contraction'. The definition of which is: The contraction of any field system in the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional to the velocity of its (center) source.

When we consider the field source to be a ringing alarm clock, we observe in that case the indicated left-to-right motion of the alarm

75 - Contents

Page 77: Total Field Theory

clock - or the right-to-left motion of the observer - to be approximately one half the speed of sound. When we consider the moving source of the field to be a light-field source rather than a sound-field source; we may then consider the left-to-right moving source or the right-to-left moving observer to be moving at approximately 4/5ths the speed of light.

Under these circumstances, the field is no longer symmetrical. The structure is not uniform in all directions from the source and throughout all of its parts. It is instead contracted in the direction of its motion; the contraction ratio corroborates to relative speed; forming a non-symmetrical field system; reasonably approximated in the referenced illustration. Let it be emphasized here that Doppler contraction is not and has never been applied to, or recognized as, applicable to Matter (Matter is stringently relegated as a static, non-expanding 'particle', not a field). I have said that Einstein proved that matter is 4-Dimensional. Yet, I have also said that Doppler effect has never been applied to matter.

76 - Contents

Page 78: Total Field Theory

This can only mean that Doppler effect is not applicable to matter; for the inevitable reason that matter is not an accelerating 4-Dimensional field after all. Or, that Doppler field contraction is actually applicable-to and exhibited-by matter, but that this application - like the 4th Dimension itself - has yet to be recognized. Another 4-DIMENSIONAL ULTIMATUM.

Pivot or Divot, continued:

Either, matter is found to exhibit Doppler shift and is therefore reconfirmed to be 4-Dimensional. Or, matter does not exhibit any evidence of Doppler shift, and, therefore, cannot possibly be a 4-Dimensionally expanding; accelerating field. Presently introducing for review one of the several unexpectedly discovered prevailing conditions of reality; derived yet once again directly from Einstein's combined Theories of Relativity. Its original technical derivations are the mathematical equations of the Dutch physicist, Hendrik Antoon Lorentz. Einstein's functional incorporation of the Lorentz equations within Relativity Theory, are, for this reason now

77 - Contents

Page 79: Total Field Theory

totally acknowledged among and familiar-to the 'physical science community' at large.

Specifically these equations are termed, 'theLorentz/Lorentzian Electromagnetic Equations'. Successfully and covariantly employed by Einstein, combined with Maxwell's electromagnetic equations, to describe the behavior of sub-atomic particles (charges of electricity).

Although H. A. Lorentz originally intended their application exclusively to moving sources (particles/charges) of electromagnetism or light, Einstein, very interestingly found another and quite unexpected application for them. Specifically, Einstein discovered that Lorentzian Electromagnetic Field Transformations are descriptively applicable to matter (in motion) itself. (The term, 'Lorentz Transformations' may sound somewhat formidable. What is mathematically and faithfully described here is still - non-mathematically - already familiar. To quote non-mathematically, what Lorentz Transformations describe, by way of what Einstein categorically proved: 'Matter: contracts in the direction of its motion at a rate increasingly proportional to its velocity'.

78 - Contents

Page 80: Total Field Theory

That is to say, matter, be it rocket or rhinoceros, and all of its contents, contracts in the direction of its motion at a Lorentzian measured rate increasingly proportional to its velocity. A brief but excellent non-mathematical elaboration of this fact can be found on page 190 of THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS, by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld. More elaborate documentation of this fact is available in any advanced physics text on Relativity. Fact #5.

I call this Einsteinian phenomenon of the Lorentzian contraction of Matter, 'MassField Doppler Effect'. It not only re-confirms that Matter is a 4-dimensionally expanding field, it also proves once again that gravity is the 4th Dimension. “What has Einstein done to these fundamental concepts (of space & time)?He has introduced a correlation or connecting link between what have always been supposed to be separate and distinct ideas. In the first place, he asserts that as we move about, the geometrical properties of space, as evidenced by figures drawn in it, will alter by an amount, depending on the speed of the observer’s motion, thus (through the concept of velocity)

79 - Contents

Page 81: Total Field Theory

linking space with time. He also asserts in the second place that the flow of time, always regarded as invariable, will likewise alter with the motion of the observer, again linking time with space. For example, suppose that we, with our instruments for measuring space and time, are located on a platform which we believe to be stationary. We can not be altogether certain of this, for there is no other visible object in the universe save another similar platform carrying an observer likewise equipped: but when we observe relative motion between our platform and the other it pleases our intuition to suppose our platform at rest and to ascribe all the motion to the other. Einstein asserts that if this relative velocity were great enough we might notice some strange happenings on the other platform. True, a rather high velocity would be necessary, something comparable with the speed of light, say, 100,000 miles per second; and it is tacitly assumed that we would be able to get a glimpse of a moving system as it flashed by. Granting this, what would we see? Einstein asserts that if there were a circle painted on the moving platform it would appear to us as an ellipse with its short

80 - Contents

Page 82: Total Field Theory

diameter in the direction of its motion. The amount of this shortening would depend upon the speed with which the system is moving, being quite imperceptible at ordinary speeds. In the limit, as the speed approached that of light, the circle would flatten completely into a straight line – its diameter perpendicular to the direction of its motion. Of this shortening, says Einstein, the moving observer will be unconscious, for not only is the circle flattened in the direction of motion, but the platform itself and all it carries (including the observer), share in this shortening. Even the observer’s measuring rod is not exempt. Laid along the diameter of the circle which is perpendicular to the line of motion it would indicate, say, ten centimeters; placed along the shortened diameter, the rod, being itself now shortened in the same ratio, would apparently indicate the same length as before, and the moving observer would have no suspicion of what we might be seeing. In fact, he might with equal right suppose himself stationary and lay all the motion to the account of our platform. And if we had a circle painted on our floor it would appear flattened to him, though not to us.

81 - Contents

Page 83: Total Field Theory

Again, the clock on the other observer’s platform would exhibit to us, though not to him, an equally eccentric behavior. Suppose that other platform stopped opposite us long enough for a comparison of clocks, and then backing off to get a start, flashed by us at high speed. As it passed we would see that the other clock was apparently slow as compared with ours, but of this the moving observer would be unconscious. But could he not observe our clock? Certainly, just as easily as we could see his. And would he not see that our clock was faster than his? ‘No,’ says Einstein. ‘On the contrary, he would take it to be slower.’ Here is a paradox indeed! A’s clock appears slow to B while at the same time B’s clock appears slow to A! Which is right? To this question Einstein answers indifferently: ‘Either. It all depends on the point of view.’ “- Paul R. Heyl, SPACE, TIME and EINSTEIN, pp. 2 & 3

One may quite reasonably ask why Einstein's successful and renowned applications of Lorentz electromagnetic Field Transformations

82 - Contents

Page 84: Total Field Theory

to Matter have never been recognized as MassField Doppler Effect. That is an extremely relevant question, and it has an equally fascinating and yet familiar 'answer' - that being that anyone and everyone can 'see' and therefore 'knows' that Matter, that is to say, physical reality at large 'is not' expanding. (The explanation for the eccentric behavior of time – non-absolute time and its relationship with non-absolute space – will be addressed with the progression of this missive.)

The contemporary 4-Dimensional dilemma unmistakably resembles the pre-heliocentric era (before Copernicus - 1473 - 1543), where everyone and anyone could 'see' and therefore 'knew' that the entire cosmological universe - the entire heavenly celestial vault - revolved around the earth, east to west; every 24 hours (rather than the earth revolving on its own axis, west to east; creating the illusion that the universe is revolving around it).

"It is all right to consider, but not to believe (they say): none of what you hear second hand, and half of what you see first hand." - A Persian parable, paraphrased (Author unknown). The only distinction in this presently

83 - Contents

Page 85: Total Field Theory

subjected case, being of course, that everyone and anyone can 'see' and therefore 'knows' that universal matter is not - certainly including people are not - expanding (4-Dimensional) field(s).

"In physics, particularly modern physics, the mathematical expression is apt to come first, its full implications only being understood afterward." - Barbara Lovettt Cline, THE MEN WHO MADE A NEW PHYSICS

Such a 'disturbing dynamic' would indeed have a dramatically endless, prohibitively incredible tendency to 'expansively spread'.

84 - Contents

Page 86: Total Field Theory

The very thought is perilously perishable. Ostensibly, everything is not expanding. The 4 dimensionally proven experimental results are discarded the moment it is 3 dimensionally subjected.

“History shows clearly that the advances of Science have always been frustrated by the tyrannical influences of certain preconceived notions which were turned into unassailable dogmas. For that reason alone, every serious scientist should periodically make a profound re-examination of his or her basic principles.” - H. Louis DeBroglie, NEW PERSPECTIVES IN PHYSICS, Basic Books, New York, 1962

"It is evident that the popular conviction that a generalized field theory is unable to explain the problems of the discontinuous structure of matter and quantum mechanics rests upon prejudice." - Albert Einstein, PHYSICS & REALITY

“We no longer think that physical action is explainable in terms of little hard balls which are the centers of all kinds of forces. A much more abstract kind of concept is demanded in which the particle is no longer something that can be considered in isolation but rather as a

85 - Contents

Page 87: Total Field Theory

part of an all-embracing entity called a ‘field’. In this development Einstein’s thought construction played a vital role. “When Minkowski in 1908 demonstrated that Einstein’s new theory was equivalent to a geometrical approach uniting space and time in one single entity (4-D space-time), the voices for a ‘physical’ explanation of relativity fell silent, since it now became obvious that an explanation in physical terms cannot be given.”- Cornelius Lanczos, ALBERT EINSTEIN and the COSMIC ORDER

Electrons, protons and neutrons invariably generate and project electromagnetic fields. In Newton's era and long afterwards, the phenomenon of electromagnetism generated by alleged 3-D 'particles' was completely mysterious. Newton specifically addresses that mystery. Matter, be it what Newton called 'particle', or systems of particles such as a planet or star, is simply represented here (Refer Illustration 8), by and within this solid circle suspended in the center of an otherwise blank page (orbited by question marks suspended in statically suspended - non-expanding – unstructured space). These Newtonian question marks were before the

86 - Contents

Page 88: Total Field Theory

advent of Field Physics, established by Maxwell (refer illustration 9).

The existence, structure and dynamics of the electromagnetic field was firstly and most successfully recognized and described in relation to Space and Time by the differential equations of the Scot, James Clerk Maxwell, in 1873. The matter (particle, electron, neutron, proton, mass-point) at the center, generates the apparent and familiar 'spider-web pattern' of radiating electromagnetic field energy projecting omni-directionally from its center source (matter generates electricity and gravity proportionate to its - the measured source's - given mass value; size, density.

87 - Contents

Page 89: Total Field Theory

Refer to Illustration 9, above and below…)

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

With the 'spider' at the center representing the field-generating particle (charge of electricity having no distinct boundaries, growing increasingly dense as you approach its center; having no surface, separating it from <but rather diffusing into> surrounding space) at the source of Maxwell's omni-directionally projecting electromagnetic field.

88 - Contents

Page 90: Total Field Theory

Incidentally, it was presumed in the Newtonian Classical Mechanical era, that gravity (F - the unidentified Force in the since adopted universal Newtonian formula for gravity: F=GMM over R2: Force = Gravity x Mass x Motion; squared) propagated across Space instantaneously, out of said particles and/or combined systems of particles. It is since then proven and acknowledged that whatever gravity is (it is politically prohibited from being electricity, or electromagnetism): also moves at the same omni-directional velocity from Matter, as does electromagnetic or light energy. Newton unarguably mastered the description of gravitational effects, while he did not pretend to know, and was careful about specifying that he did not know the causal identity - or even the directional vector - of F (Force=Universal Gravitation).

“Are gravitational waves divided into discrete energy packets, or quanta, as electromagnetic waves are? This question, which is as old as the quantum theory, was finally answered in 1960, by Dirac. He succeeded in quantizing the gravitational field equations, and showed that the energy of gravity quanta, or ‘gravitons’, is equal to Planck’s constant ‘h’, times their

89 - Contents

Page 91: Total Field Theory

frequency – the same expression that gives the energy of light quanta or photons.”- Isaac Asimov, UNDERSTANDING PHYSICS, p. 164 Until further notice, no one besides this record and apparently those influenced by its international distribution since 1959, seems to have allowed for the offered gravitational alternative (that gravity might actually be a repelling force: that Newton's famous findings allow for that unknown, unpursued possibility; from the preface to the PRINCIPIA); since Newton made a noteworthy point of offering it. No one on campus is allowed to sharpen a pencil on this dull note. It might awaken the big eared – electromagnetically bewildered - snoozing Physics teacher.

Mr. Spock has not left the Berkeley or Lawrence Livermore building or black hole engulfed holodeck? Obviously the earth is not moving rotationally on its own axis; generating the illusion imparted on all of its inhabitants that the universal celestial vault is rotating around the earth; rather than conversely. The archaic, pre Copernican era resides with us ever since, as a place to start realizing that

90 - Contents

Page 92: Total Field Theory

sometimes we misunderstand things as being the other way around, from the way things really are.

"According to the General Theory of Relativity, the concept of space detached from any physical content does not exist. The physical reality of space is represented by a field." - Albert Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 348

Gravity on or near a major gravitational mass: acting as a repelling force, rather than an impelling force - an alternative directional vector. Newton allows for it. Einstein requires it. But Carl Sagen and his friends don't allow for or require it. On the contrary, they reject it altogether.

Chapter Four FINDING THE 5th and 6th DIMENSIONS

"Since the General Theory of Relativity implies the representation of physical reality by a continuous field, the concept of particles or material points cannot play a fundamental part. The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which the field strength or the energy density is particularly high."

91 - Contents

Page 93: Total Field Theory

- Albert Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 348

Having One's Tea While Spilling It Also, continued: 'Obviously the universe is not made up of a bunch of disturbed areas. Because, if it was, by now it would have *spread indefinitely.' - J.W.N Sullivan (THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE) and G.P. Thompson(A *tensor equation - *4th coordinate; of time and motion - applicable where only three coordinates were previously perceived.)

Note: the ‘obvious’ is not put into words here. The obvious, being that the physical - as well as spatial - universe is found to be *expanding. Whereas, that inevitably *descriptive word - expanding - is displaced with 'spread indefinitely'.

Note also, J.W.N. Sullivan's (LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE) and George Gamow's (GRAVITY) reference to expanding charges of electricity (particles): they are not called that. Instead, they are obliquely referred to as 'unstable', and 'disturbed areas' (On medical hold?) - New Age Verbal Judoists?

92 - Contents

Page 94: Total Field Theory

Conversely: becoming exactly as three dimensionally small, as the universe becomes four dimensionally larger around a given 3-D entity (Refer Schwartzchild radius). Squared. (Refer: Black holes: Where Mr. Flatlander & Co. do bullish business and bearish residence without the 4th dimension.) The so called 'indefinite spread' is in fact very well defined. Refer, Sir Isaac Newton's gravitational alternative, and Albert Einstein's four dimensional acceleration, and so forth, squared: proving a steady state universe; discovering the 5th & 6th dimensions (which will be identified with the progression of this missive), allowing a causal explanation for black hole singularities, etceteras.

Having to do, for example, with anytime anyone drops - or in any way projects, or hurls - anything at all at any time, anywhere on/near this planet. "Physics is what physicists do". - Dr. Peter Bergmann, GRAVITATION. Every time the impatient mathematician at the blackboard drops his chalk, the reputed, immeasurable and incomprehensible answer continues to elude his precipitating powers of observation. Finding Dr. Livingston, patrolling

93 - Contents

Page 95: Total Field Theory

vigilantly on the popularly presumptuous river of denial.

Another Statically Overlooked, Expanding Ultimatum: Thereby and thence, it was Maxwell from whom we learned that the presumed static field, already known to originate-with and project-from Matter, is actually expanding, Thereby generating a perfect Natural expression of the geometric LAW OF THE INVERSE SQUARE. Projecting and distributing the same amount of energy, omni-directionally from matter sources; over an increasingly greater area, at the speed of light.

An outwardly unfolding field in time, inversely squared in space, per light wave and/or system of light waves, without end... Finite (at any given moment in space) but unbounded (in Past microcosmic and Future Macrocosmic time).

"An electromagnetic wave is a double wave: electric and magnetic field strengths travel together at right angles each to the other and are intimately interwoven (*inseparable). Thus light is electromagnetic field : traveling through space from out of electromagnetic

94 - Contents

Page 96: Total Field Theory

charges (*called 'particles') which have produced (*generated) them... these two sets of force lines are respectively analogous in familiar gravitational terms, to the lines down which falling objects drop perpendicular to a surface (as of the earth) and contrariwise to the path lines of moons or satellites orbiting parallel to the same surface." - Guy Murchie, MUSIC OF THE SPHERES (including illustation - electricity and magnetism as the 5th & 6th dimensions will be further issued with the progression of this missive. Please take note that the fields generated by the center source charges prevent those charges from ever contacting each other - there is no surface to surface 'touch', because there are no specific surfaces. The charges become infinitely more dense as their centers are approached).

95 - Contents

Page 97: Total Field Theory

It is noteworthy also that the Inverse Square Law of ElectroMagnetism, like its velocity (that of light), is likewise, equally applicable to gravity; whatever else gravity may be. It is emphasized here that gravity is not acknowledged or recognized to be electromagnetism. We will return shortly to further consider this vainly grid-locked, conceptually superstitious, Ivy League mesmerizing bogey.

96 - Contents

Page 98: Total Field Theory

The question arises, 'if' everything is actually expanding constantly, than how can this uniform expansion be observed, comprehended and/or non-mathematically measured? Are we not returned to not knowing and not being able to know whether or not MACDONALD'S pan fried BIG MAC's are expanding? Doesn't the consumer have a right to know (a meaty need to lean upon), one way or the other, about a rare consideration like this? If it is knowable, how may it be recognized? We will return to this beefy question and its unprecedented answers shortly, by way of the following, brief, introductory considerations. "Why could it not be as true to say that the earth falls up to meet things in the sky, as that things in the sky fall down to the earth? Is not that simple relativity? Or am I too full of apple juice? It is relativity, but perhaps it is not so very simple. For, although the apple is regarded as moving downward, can one... could one possibly justify a claim that the earth is accelerating upward just as much?

On the face of it, upward terrestrial acceleration would seem quite impossible for more than a very small portion of the earth,

97 - Contents

Page 99: Total Field Theory

since upward, globally speaking, is not one direction, but every direction. In fact, if the earth's surface is accelerating upward all around the earth, the earth as a whole must be exploding. Which it obviously is not." - Guy Murchie, MUSIC OF THE SPHERES

Murchie's work is a voluminous, superb labor of scientific love; this author has learned much from him, yet he suffers, like all the rest, not from being 'too full of apple juice', but rather, from not enough of it.

Without exception, every single approach to and encounter with this problem is dismissed, upside down and backwards - even the questions and attitudes addressing it. Without allusion to Guy Murchie, the mathematically mesmerized monkey has located, palmed and fisted his 4-D prize inside the narrow necked jar, but adamantly refuses to open his hand in the required effort to remove same. The unrecognized solution is mathematically proven and located; whereas the numbers-fixated primate deigns not to liberate the discovered genie; he insists that he cannot. All the while refusing to open his hand, let go of his subjectively incapacitating instincts, so that he may then non-mathematically remove his

98 - Contents

Page 100: Total Field Theory

hand, invert the jar, and let gravity do the rest...

In the history of particle expeditions, each one adventures into and returns with electromagnetic charges - 'matter-fields' - fulfilling all of the formal qualities of particular ('discontinuous, 3-D surface-boundaried, 'static' <'standing field' perceived>) 'matter': which has never been found. An entire, academically massive discipline of particle physics, abundant with Ph.D's, is 'based' on a so far mythologically subjective presumption - 'the particle' - that remains in suspension to be empirically established. 'Particle Physics', has yet to present itself as a tractable hypothesis, let alone any kind of tenable 'Theory'. Yet 'the particle' remains the dominant paradigm over the universally emerged, manifestly ubiquitous 'field', or 'charge'. If 'physics is what physicists do', as Dr. Bergmann proclaims, they are collectively residing in a (Einstein’s formerly speculated) house of cards, a sky castle of sand; applauding and paying homage to a hoax that makes the Piltdown Man a nominated candidate for the Nobel Prize.

The formula with which Maxwell successfully described and predicted the structure and

99 - Contents

Page 101: Total Field Theory

dynamics of the previously unknown (presumed static) ElectroMagnetic Field are now of course very well renowned as, 'Maxwell's ElectroMagnetic Equations'; describing the much controversied, newly recognized and acknowledged field forces.

In consideration of what Einstein called a 'TOTAL FIELD THEORY', it is consistently said that Maxwell's ElectroMagnetic Equations are not (POST-FIELD PHYSICS) applicable to the alleged 3-D static 'particles', because Maxwell's Equations describe expanding energy exclusively, and, 'therefore break-down at the non-expanding surface of the particle' - the in-place, 4th dimension-excluding, 3-dimensional filibuster.

“The unsatisfactory part of the total field theory showed up externally by the necessity of assuming finite dimensions for the particles in order to prevent the electromagnetic field existing at their surfaces from becoming infinitely large." - Albert Einstein, OUT OF MY LATER YEARS, p. 77

Yet, since Maxwell, we long ago unexpectedly discovered that the alleged 3-D ‘particle’ does not have a surface, and in fact is not a particle

100 - Contents

Page 102: Total Field Theory

at all, but an electrical charge of energy which simply becomes increasingly more dense towards its center. A charge of electricity fulfilling the formal *definition of particular matter (*that which occupies 3 or more dimensions of space and inertially opposes a resistance to non-uniform motion): ostensibly, having been doing this, all along, as it were. That is Fact #6.

Cogent quotes, worthy of repeating: "What appears certain to me in the foundations of any consistent field theory, the particle concept must not appear in addition to the field concept. The whole theory must be based solely on partial differential equations and their *singularity free solutions (*no discontinuous, 3-dimensionally static particles)." - A. Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 306.

"It is evident that the popular conviction that a generalized field theory is unable to explain the problems of the discontinuous structure of matter and quantum mechanics rests upon prejudice." - A. Einstein, PHYSICS & REALITY

We keep finding new ways to make the same mistake - sternly defining the universe for

101 - Contents

Page 103: Total Field Theory

Mother Nature, informing her of her ways and limitations; what is expected of her.

Here's how it happens all the time: The non-mathematical identification of the 4th space-time Dimension enables among other things, the unprecedented discovery and identification of two previously unrecognized Dimensions of Reality - the 5th & 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism - physically extending beyond the 4th dimension of corporeal ('apparently 3-D') matter.

102 - Contents

Page 104: Total Field Theory

Again, these two 'new' Dimensions are not really 'unknown' or 'inexperienced' at all; merely unrecognized. In compliance with the

103 - Contents

Page 105: Total Field Theory

geometric definition for dimensions, if anything moves at right angles to; perpendicular from the 4th Dimension (of matter), then whatever that something is, is also the 5th Dimension. Indeed, something does move at right angles out of 4-D matter - that something being electricity, therefore, electricity is the 5th dimension. In turn, whatever may move at right angles to the 5th dimension of electricity, is the 6th dimension - that being magnetism. That is to say, electromagnetism moving out of 4-D matter, is 5 and 6 dimensional.

After Maxwell we learned of the existence and especially the structural quality and dynamics of the electromagnetic field. The matter

104 - Contents

Page 106: Total Field Theory

(particle, electron, neutron, proton, mass-point) at the center, generates the apparent and familiar spider-web pattern of radiating electromagnetic field energy projecting omni-directionally from its center source (matter generates electricity and gravity proportionate to its - the measured source's - given mass value; size, density).

Prior to this time, Michael Faraday had already recognized the existence of some force originating in material bodies and projecting out of them across Space - but he had also considered this ' force' to be static; that is to say, 'non-expanding' (pre Field Physics).

Moreover, Faraday had no idea of the structure and/or shape/ pattern of the electromagnetic field. Maxwell, on the other hand, proved that electromagnetic fields possess a characteristic and predictable shape and intensity ('field density') in (Classical) Space & Time, and are projected continuously and omni-directionally outward from their alleged 3-D 'particle' sources at a finite velocity; that being 186,282 m.p.s... Along Came The Untangled Weave, Warp & Woof. Creating an interestingly similar pattern; as that structural transverse projection, so

105 - Contents

Page 107: Total Field Theory

characteristically like a spider-spun web (A natural expression of the inverse square law; projected omni-directionally from its source; uniformly more dispersed with distance)...

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

106 - Contents

Page 108: Total Field Theory

Chapter Five MAXWELL’S ACTION AT A DISTANCE, LAMBDA, & NON ABSOLUTE SPACETIME DILATION

With the spider at the center representing the field-generating particle (charge of electricity having no distinct boundaries, growing increasingly dense as you approach its center; having no surface, separating it from <but rather diffusing into> surrounding space) at the source of Maxwell's omni-directionally projecting electromagnetic field.

Specifically, we learned from Maxwell that something does in fact move at right angles out of (4-D) matter, and that 'something' is electricity. Therefore Electricity Is The 5th Dimension. Again, in compliance with the geometric definition for Dimensions, if any measurable entity moves at right angles from/to the 5th - whatever else it may be: it is also the 6th dimension. Indeed. Something does (invariably) move at right angles to/perpendicular from 5 dimensional electricity, and that something is magnetism. Therefore, magnetism is The 6th Dimension. (Electricity and magnetism - until further notice - always

107 - Contents

Page 109: Total Field Theory

accompany one another; at right angles, bumper to bumper and side by side.)

Of course, in order to recognize and identify the 5th & 6th Dimensions of Electricity & Magnetism, one must first of all acknowledge and recognize The 4th Dimension of expanding Matter & accelerating Gravity. From which is projected the 5th and 6th physical dimensions of electromagnetic reality: Acting at a distance across space; projecting the law of the inverse square; at the speed of light; 'just like gravity.' In fact, finding gravity and electromagnetism to be, in every sense of the word, one and the same (Dirac’s quantum ‘gravitons’ – Planck’s photo-electric constant ‘h’): a unified field.

We may - presently opportune to - know, gravity on earth is caused by the electromagnetic 4-Dimensional acceleration of Matter. This generates a mechanical pushing or repelling force on or near the surface of major gravitational masses (such as planets); as clarified within Einstein's elevators of The General Principle.

But, how does this account for action-at-a-distance across Space; generating

108 - Contents

Page 110: Total Field Theory

atmospheric, oceanic and terrestrial tidal effects for example, and sustaining the orbiting of the planets? *Why don't their orbits collapse? Why don't they all (stellar objects, galaxies, stars, et al) collapse upon and/or collide with each other, through mutual gravitational attraction? As Isaac Newton himself asked, and openly considered to be the major unresolved flaw in his own revolutionary system... *Two and a quarter centuries later, Einstein resolved Newton's problem with the Cosmological Constant - a repelling force paralleling conventionally perceived gravity, but acting in the opposite direction; paralleling the vector of a positive charge; in contrast to the impelling force generated by a negative charge.

“This was the introduction of a fresh term in the field equations of General Relativity, the ‘cosmological constant’, which represents a repelling force, which, contrary to ordinary gravitational attraction, increases with the distance between objects. The value given to this term determines the character of the universe which is produced, and from the first

109 - Contents

Page 111: Total Field Theory

it was a matter of controversy.” – Ronald W. Clark, EINSTEIN: The Life & Times, p. 269

The answer to Newton's question is not in the 4-dimensional MassField gravity, on or near the surface of expansively accelerating material systems - but rather the 5 & 6 dimensional ElectroMagnetic field generated by and projecting at right angles from material - 4 dimensional - sources (particles, charges; systems of same). That is to say, material bodies on or near the apparent surface of matter are gravitationally influenced to 'fall', or remain (mechanically-inertially) pinned against the earth's 4-Dimensionally accelerating surface. On the other hand, action-at-a-distance - specifically tidal effects and the orbiting of planets & moons - is gravitationally motivated by the push and pull of the 5th & 6th Dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively.

Another way of realizing this - when you are near and above a large 4-dimensional MassField, you fall, until your orbital vector 'outweighs' (transcends) the influence of gravity. Then your orbit is permanent; that is to say, you do not fall back to earth, but

110 - Contents

Page 112: Total Field Theory

rather, around it, having gone ballistically orbital. Wikipedia

• Have questions? Find out how to ask questions and get answers. • Jump to: navigation, searchNewton's cannonball was a thought experimentIsaac Newton used to hypothesize that the force of gravity was universal, and it was the key force for planetary motion. [edit] The experiment

In this experiment Newton visualizes a cannon on top of a very high mountain.If there were no force of gravitation the cannonball should follow a straight line away from Earth.So long as there is a gravitational force acting on the cannon ball, it will follow different paths depending on its initial velocity.

1. If the speed is low, it will simply fall back on Earth. (A and B) 2. If the speed equals some threshold orbital velocity it will go on circling around the Earth along

a fixed circular orbit just like the moon. (C)

3. If the speed is higher than the orbital velocity, but not high enough to leave Earth altogether (lower than the escape velocity) it will continue rotating around Earth along an elliptical orbit. (D)

4. If the speed is very high, it will indeed leave Earth. (E)

Summarily, in the case of permanent orbit you are repelled away from 4-D MassField

111 - Contents

Page 113: Total Field Theory

Earth and kept in (ever enlarging, spiral shaped) orbit by the 5th & 6th Dimensions of ElectroMagnetism. The ElectroMagnetic fields of the planets (for example) are reciprocally conflicting with the electromagnetic field of the Sun (emits about one billion tons of radiantly transitory energy every four minutes). Hence, planets cannot fall into the Sun; due to their mutual opposition from (and toward) it - and they cannot escape it either.

Wikipedia

The magnetosphere shields the surface of the Earth from the charged particles of the solar wind. It is compressed on the day (Sun) side due to the force of the arriving particles, and extended on the night side. (Image not to scale.)

The retinue of planets arranged exactly about the sun in the orders and orbits of Newton's indomitably calculated, universally gravitating retainer; unarguably caused by a pulling force or a pushing force. Or, a combined pulling and pushing force… Newton’s 3rd Law: “To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction; or the

112 - Contents

Page 114: Total Field Theory

mutual action of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.”

Mechanically pushing at near distances and electromagnetically pulling and/or pushing at far distances... (In Nature we find a positive charge projecting a repelling force and a negative charge generating an impelling force. Gravitational impelling forces are actively present on, near and within the surface of the earth – a test object suspended from a plumb-bob does in fact gravitate toward a mountain range, for example, and there certainly seems to be an impelling force involved in aquatic, atmospheric and terrestrial tides; but the repelling force of 4-D expansion is dominant).

The fields from isolated, individual charges look like this:

When there is more than one charge in a region, the electric field lines will not be straight lines; they will curve in response to the different charges. In every case, though, the field is highest where the field lines are close together, and decreases as the lines get further apart. physics.bu.edu/~duffy/PY106/Electricfield.html

113 - Contents

Page 115: Total Field Theory

__________________________

The isolated positive charge is confined to it's location - exhibiting negative inertia (a tendency to remain at rest; resisting outside forces) - by the recoil of omni-directionally expanding electrical energy.

The isolated negative charge is confined to its location - also exhibiting negative inertia (a resistance to outside forces) by the omni-directional influx of electrical energy. – KBR

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

114 - Contents

Page 116: Total Field Theory

Hypothetical dark energy is imo, another word for the formerly abandoned Lambda Cosmological Constant (/\), which is functionally back in service, as I have previously noted, unabashedly retrieved from obscurity and now referred to along side 'quintessence' and activated as 'LCDM' - Lambda Cold Dark Matter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/19419

Please observe the fait accompli reinstatement of Einstein's 'abandoned' Cosmological Constant, as this work predicted - along with an accelerating universe - over 45 years ago.

Due to their reciprocal acceleration against each and other's electromagnetic and/or radiation fields, extending beyond four dimensional matter; across space (acting at a distance) - fulfilling the definition for the fifth and sixth dimensions; as electromagnetism acting at a distance; commensurate with Newtonian-Einsteinian - and other formally proven and recognized and/or recognizable - definition(s) of universal gravity; including the

115 - Contents

Page 117: Total Field Theory

presently abandoned now reinstated Cosmological Constant.

Regarding the tenability of gravitation as an impelling force, paralleled by the Cosmological Constant as a repelling force, a natural and complementary occurrence of this apparently incongruous ambiguity exists and prevails in the fact that omni-directional electric field lines around a positive charge are directed away from the center of the charge; whereas, the field lines around a negative charge move inward, toward the center of the charge

A characteristic of the (reinstated) Cosmological Constant is that its effect increases with distance. Its application to the accelerating expansion of the spatial universe corroborates this characteristic.

The increase of speed with distance can be demonstrated with an expanding yardstick, the more it expands, the faster its ends move away from each other.

This principle of accelerating expansion is also applicable to the expansion of matter - why gravity is acceleration. ------------

116 - Contents

Page 118: Total Field Theory

Another look at the structure of a snail or nautilus shell, and/or the arms of spiral galaxies (What an @ sign geometrically describes the structural shape of): A consequence of this is the realization of the actual 4-D path of any orbiting body - electron, moon, planet - as compared to what we perceive in 3 presumably static Dimensions of Space. That is to say, because of the unrecognized 4-Dimensional acceleration of Matter, and the extensionally functional 5 & 6 Dimensional space separating it from other matter, the path of any orbiting body is not characteristically circular - O - or ellipsoidal - 0 - as it is 3-Dimensionally observed or understood to be. Instead, the MassField Concept recognizes that the path in Space-Time of every orbiting body exists 4-Dimensionally as an accelerating - ever enlarging - spiral (@ - see immediate below illustration): the distance of space opening up between the orbiting body and its point of orbit, is no more recognized and accounted for, than the ever ongoing physical enlargement of the orbiting body and its point of orbit (the dominant mass of two considered gravitational masses; each actually orbiting a

117 - Contents

Page 119: Total Field Theory

common center of gravity between the two - or more - centers). 4-D HyperOrbital path.

It is important to recognize that a spiral that does not exponentially enlarge, such as the 'Archimedes spiral', illustrated below, is not to be confused with the accelerating - exponentially enlarging/ extrapolating - spiral illustrated here, above. It is the difference between uniform enlargement and non-uniform, accelerating enlargement - both of which are expanding, but only the above of which is accelerating - ever faster - in its expansion.

118 - Contents

Page 120: Total Field Theory

Polar equation: r = a SPECULATIVE NOTE: The loss of 43° of arc per century in the elliptical extreme orbit of Mercury (the shortest of planetary years in the solar system) - and correspondingly more reduced losses for the planets correspondingly further from the Sun - appears resolvable in the (illustrated, uncompensated for) 4-D HyperOrbitalPath.

Likewise, the accelerating (equiangular) spiral - @ - as applied to Mendelyev's *Periodic Table of Elements exhibits this structure - very comparable to the shape of a spiraling snail shell, and/or internal structure of the mature *chambered nautilus (pompileus linnae).

119 - Contents

Page 121: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Accelerating spirals commonly occur in biologically growing, 4-dimensionally expressed nature. This example of planetary field reciprocally and physically conflicting with solar field, and lunar mass reciprocally and physically conflicting with hosting planetary field, is already directly experienced in the proven, acknowledged fact that two or more physical bodies never ‘contact’ each other. Due to conflicting field forces of surfaceless electrical charges: disallowing the

120 - Contents

Page 122: Total Field Theory

simultaneous occupation of their space by any other field-charge.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

121 - Contents

Page 123: Total Field Theory

An Expansive 4-D Thought Problem With a Dilatory Solution: The realm of the very small - microcosms - is said to host strong forces acting at very short distances; that are not considered to be related to large, 'weak forces of gravity', said to exist only in very large spaces and act at large distances in the very large - macrocosmic - spaces and times. So it is presently and dominantly considered, in the macrocosmic realm of the very large, exemplary, planetary-generated forces.

Gravity is thought not to occur - significantly - in the microcosmic realm of the very small. Whereas, gravity, like Gold, is actually where you find it, and how much of it you find; in large and *small, tenuous and *compact electromagnetic densities (*refer, nuclear binding forces). Moving in one of two possible - direction(s). Toward and/or away (impelling or repelling) from its material (4-D particle/charge) source.

Question: ‘Is matter expanding at the same rate of acceleration as light?’ Answer: ‘Yes, but, in a value of square (2). Consequently, the rate of acceleration is the same, but the expansion speeds vary with

122 - Contents

Page 124: Total Field Theory

microcosmic (very small) and macrocosmic (very large) space-time, in a value of square. Consider the (incorrect) distinction between electromagnetism & gravity as the status quo, i.e., the prevailing idea that microcosmic ‘nuclear binding forces’, ‘are not, and cannot be’ related to gravitational forces. This ‘disqualification’ of any unification of microcosmic electromagnetism with gravity is based on the false, prevailing and uncontested premise alleged in the ‘difference’ between large gravitational forces which cause planets to orbit, and the smaller forces which bind ‘particles’ together within the atomic nucleus - sometimes called ‘nuclear resinal forces’.

In this sense, contemporary physical science still dwells in the archaic conceptual world of *Ptolemic-*Aristotelean dualization of ‘earthly & heavenly motions’ - *when it was thought that the unidentified forces of the far flung universe and heavens were apart from - unrelated to - the unidentified forces acting on earth; until the time of Newton, who proved that large forces in the universe were the same forces acting on and near earth. That the fall of an apple was governed by the same forces that

123 - Contents

Page 125: Total Field Theory

caused the moon to orbit the earth, and the earth’s orbit around the sun...

It is said that the electromagnetic force reciprocating between an electron and a proton is 1041 times the gravitational force; the gravitational force between these two ‘particles’ alleged to be ‘too weak’ to be measured’ at this microcosmic level.

The nuclear force which is distinquished from gravity ‘because’ it is 1041 times stronger, is (microcosmic - 'earlier Moment A') gravity (unrecognized and unacknowledged by physicists): this is due to the (4-D continuum) fact that the value(s) of time is covariant with the moment(s) of space it (time/motion) occurs in...

Allow this pie plate chart design diagram < to represent the Moments A, B, and C, 4-D expansion of any given physical or spatial system, where the left-most intersection of the two lines represents earlier Moment A (the convergence of the 4-D space-time continuum emerging from out of the infinite microcosms) the right-most opening representing later Moment C, advancing into the infinite macrocosms, with the middle of this pie plate

124 - Contents

Page 126: Total Field Theory

chart representing Moment B - the 'eternal now' - of the considered 4-D continuum. (The actual shape of which would account for acceleration, in a profile structure such as Riemannian geometry's representation of a 'gravity sink' <Refer 'rubber sheet analogy'; featuring Riemannian geometric shapes>).

The value of a linear, square or cubic mile of space on (earlier) Moment A earth, is not the same value as that same mile measured on (later) Moment B earth, or on (latest) Moment C earth.

When a motorist on Moment A earth drives his automobile at the speed he measures as 60 miles per hour, he is not traveling 60 of Moment B miles per Moment B hour...

Moreover, the velocity of 18 & 1/2 Moment A miles per second, traveled by Moment A earth around Moment A sun, is not the same velocity as compared with the 18 1/2 miles per second traveled by Moment B earth around Moment B sun...

Neither is the 365 1/4 days of Moment A year the same interval in time - in this case determined by the completion of an orbit around the sun - as the 365 1/4 days of

125 - Contents

Page 127: Total Field Theory

Moment B or Moment C (providing that these moments could be and were compared with each other).

The velocity of light - C - in this continuum, correspondingly varies from one moment to the next, while remaining constant, relative to the space-time moment from which it originates and with which it is associated. This principle of relative velocity is what allows for an 'optical', or 'event horizon', for example.

When the ‘mini person’ inhabitant of Moment A earth may look ‘up’ along the positive (future) side of the 4th dimension of time, and see themselves at (later) Moment(s) B or C, they would see their own image as an incredibly huge, slow moving giant; if this slow moving giant of Moment A mini-person’s future could look ‘down’ along the past side of their continuously accelerating 4-D projection, they would then observe themselves as a tiny, very fast moving ‘mini-person’.

There is no way for Moment A mini-person (thinking in 3-D conceptual physics) to know that their 3 dimensions of space, and consequently their time will be relatively larger

126 - Contents

Page 128: Total Field Theory

(spatially) and slower (chronologically) at (future) Moments B and C.

Conversely, there is no way for that same giant, slow moving person in (later) Moments B and C to know that the spatial dimensions and time of their entire (Moment A) universe was correspondingly more contracted in space, having proportionately smaller durations of time, at Moment A. The false assumption is that the value of space is the same with the passage of time; that, if Moment A earth was compared to Moment B and C earth, it (the earth) would have the same uniform size and density in space, when compared with itself at different moments in time.

Newton contemplated a 4-D continuum but did not anticipate that the values of space and time would vary with different spaces and times of that continuum.

The ‘here and now’ dimensions of ‘space and time’ appear - and are 3-dimensionally conceptualized - to be uniform and unchanging. The law of conservation of mass-energy is not infringed upon, since this expanding continuum is always the same

127 - Contents

Page 129: Total Field Theory

amount of energy distributed over an ever increasing space; maintaining uniform relative density.

The acceleration of the apparently static (‘non-expanding’) 3 dimensions of space along the 4th dimension of time (the 4-D space-time continuum) reveals a contracted micro-space accompanied by a correspondingly and inevitably contracted micro-time. and a dilated macrospace accompanied by an equally and correspondingly dilated (‘slowed down’) macro-time. This is the reason that Einstein called ‘Space and Time’: Space-Time.

This is the cause of what Einstein calls ‘Non-absolute time’, and 'non-absolute space'.

It is also the cause of what Einstein calls ‘time dilation’. The value of time is determined by the value of space it occurs in. Larger moments of 4-D space result in relatively slower time, when compared with the value of time in smaller moments of 4-D space.

128 - Contents

Page 130: Total Field Theory

The Twin Paradox Re-visited: A popular example of relativistic non-absolute time (time dilation phenomenon) is known as the 'twin paradox'. One of two twin brothers

129 - Contents

Page 131: Total Field Theory

remains on coordinate system earth, while the other twin departs the earth in a spacecraft vehicle, approaches the velocity of light; remains in deep space sustaining high velocity for what his senses and instruments measure as 30 days; then returns to earth to learn that his earthbound twin brother and everyone else on earth (who was his age upon his departure) is considerably more aged than himself.

There is no conceptual explanation for this, however, the mathematics of relativity indicate that time dilation is a true effect of greatly increased velocities. The twin paradox becomes conceptually comprehensible with the application of the issued , expanding mass-field concept: When an object - a space-craft and its contents accelerates faster than the coordinate system from which it originates and with which it is normally associated, the earth, the mass-field constructed spacecraft and its contents are distributed over a greater area, in accordance with the inverse square law (a system of relatively uniform space and time; in this case, as applicable to light). Consequently it becomes an independent coordinate system, having relatively larger values of space and

130 - Contents

Page 132: Total Field Theory

proportionately slower experiences of time than its original coordinate system, earth.

In a spacecraft nearing the velocity of light the individual hairs on the heads of it's astronauts may (for example) be dilated (enlarged) to the diameter of a large radar dish (relative to the dimensions of space recognized on coordinate system earth). Yet, the astronauts detect no change of spatial values relative to themselves or their ship and its contents, including all of its time measuring instruments, because everything on board is proportionately dilated in 4-D space-time (much larger than that on coordinate system, earth). For example: It takes these mass field dilated astronauts several of earth's relatively micro-spatial hours - and one of their relatively macro-spatial seconds - to sneeze. Upon returning to coordinate system earth, they must slow their speed, and in so doing they proportionately decrease their former - field expanded - size. Upon disembarking the now 'normal sized' spacecraft, they learn that years have passed on earth, while they and their instruments have experienced, recorded, and can account for only a month of time in space.

131 - Contents

Page 133: Total Field Theory

Up to the time of this writing, there are not even any failed efforts to conceptually account for 'time dilation' and the 'twin paradox' that popularly accompanies it.

The (stubbornly unrecognized and denied) ever enlarging value of space is a ‘non absolute space’, which causes ‘non-absolute time’. The fundamental import of this discussion is that THE VALUE OF GIVEN UNITS OF TIME (seconds, hours, days, weeks, months, years) IS ENTIRELY DETERMINED BY THE 3-D VALUE (size) OF THE SPATIAL MOMENT (coordinate system) IT (time / motion ) OCCURS IN. .......................................................

The Unified Field Theory

132 - Contents

Page 134: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney Drawing by Robert Crumb

Einstein authored three major works on Relativity. Two are very well renowned, academically, as well as socio-politically. Einstein's two renowned theories are of course, the Special Theory of 1906 - which is all about light - ElectroMagnetism - and uniform motion (the C, of E=MC 2 ). And, the General Theory of 1916, which is all about Matter, Gravity and non-uniform motion (acceleration).

In 1919, Einstein authored a third work which is not so well known; primarily because it was

133 - Contents

Page 135: Total Field Theory

only temporarily accepted by the scientific community; then abandoned eight years later. Alloted time does not permit me to elaborate the details of Einstein's third and least known work, but I am sure you will find its title very familiar. It is the Unified Field Theory. The conceptual objective of which was to find electromagnetism and gravity one and the same force.

It would take at least thirty minutes to cursorily begin to do it justice here; in the allotted time we cannot afford to go into that detail. On the other hand, in a matter of one minute or less we may recapitulate the fact that the primary objective of Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field Theory was to unify the Special & General Theories into one singular statement, The Unified Field. Specifically the unification of what are otherwise academically considered to be separate and unrelated forces; forces, which the Unified Field proves as actually having the same causal identity - ElectroMagnetism & Gravity. Repeat: The Unified Field is abandoned; its cardinal objective was to find ElectroMagnetism and Gravity as two

134 - Contents

Page 136: Total Field Theory

apparently unrelated forces which actually have the same causal identity.

Presently summarizing that gravity is the space-time 4th Dimension because Physical Matter is found to be an expanding ElectroMagnetic Field, and conversely.

“Relativity theory furnishes a new way of looking at gravity and describing it, but it still remains a mysterious, little-understood phenomenon. No one knows what connection it has, if any, with electromagnetism. Einstein and others have tried to develop a unified field theory that will unite gravity and electromagnetism in one set of mathematical equations. The results have been disappointing. Perhaps some young reader of these words, will someday see how to formulate such a theory." - p. 108, Relativity for the Million, Martin Gardner.

Summarizing that the cause of gravitational action-at-a-distance is the 5th & 6th Dimensions, which are also (each and both), categorically, an expanding electromagnetic field. Fact #7.

We have, among other things in the past 65 minutes, overseen the reinstatement and

135 - Contents

Page 137: Total Field Theory

confirmation of Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field Theory. Matter as well as electromagnetism is found to be constantly expanding. Past is measured prologue...

"There is no sense in regarding matter and field as two qualities quite different from each other. We cannot imagine (or find) a definite surface separating distinctly field and matter. The division of matter and field is, after the recognition of the equivalence of mass and energy, something artificial and not clearly defined. Could we not reject the concept of matter and build a pure field physics? What impresses our senses as matter is really a great concentration of energy into a comparatively small place. We could regard matter as the region in space where the field is extremely strong. In this way a new philosophical background could be created. Its final aim would be the explanation of all events in nature by structure laws valid always and everywhere. A thrown stone is, from this point of view, a changing field, where the states of greatest field intensity travel through space with the velocity of the stone. There would be no place, in our new physics, for both field and matter, field being the only reality. This new

136 - Contents

Page 138: Total Field Theory

view is suggested by the great achievements of field physics, by our success in expressing the laws of electricity, magnetism, and gravitation in the form of structure laws, and finally, by the equivalence of mass and energy (E=MC2). Our ultimate problem would be to modify our field laws in such a way that they would not break down for regions in which the energy is enormously concentrated."- Albert Einstein & Leopold Infeld, THE EVOLUTION OF PHYSICS, pp. 242-3

"The electromagnetic field is, for the modern physicist, as real as the chair on which he sits." - Page 151, Ibid

Suppose we pursue, find and reflect this 'new physics' (not furniture?), referenced above by Einstein... What happens when we take his 'new philosophical background' as it is applied to a thrown stone (for example), and observe "the greatest state of field intensity travel through space with the velocity of the stone': beneath that thrown stone's apparently curved trajectory? What shall this pursuit and the proper - 'new view' - reflection of Einstein's proposed 'new physics' be called? Why not call it, 'the new gravity'? And how shall it be recognized and perceived? Why not exactly as

137 - Contents

Page 139: Total Field Theory

we find it; in accordance with the best information; opening with that (deliberately and inadvertently) provided by the most highly respected authorities on the subject?

"The comparative smallness of what we know today as gravitational effects is not a conclusive reason for ignoring the General Principle of Relativity in theoretical investigations of a fundamental character. In other words, I do not believe it is justifiable to ask: 'What would physics look like without gravitation (the General Principle)?' - Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, pp. 352-3

Chapter Six THE COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT & GEODESICS

This is Dave. / Dave's not here!; etc. - Cheech & Chong. CATCH 22, continued: Moreover, the attending or reading audience not sleeping, is witness to the unprecedented identification and hence the qualified recognition and discovery of the 5th dimension of electricity, and, the 6th dimension of magnetism:

138 - Contents

Page 140: Total Field Theory

The heart-foundation of Einstein's Unified Field Theory is a (previously unknown repelling) force which Einstein discovered within and extracted from his General Theory of Relativity. That is the same theory that revealed and introduced us to the 4th Dimension.

Einstein called this previously unknown force 'the Cosmological Constant'. When he spoke of it in his Unified Field equations he designated it with the Greek sign 'Lambda', which resembles an inverted capital 'V', like this: /\ .The non-mathematical definition of Einstein's 'Lambda' or 'Cosmological Constant': 'A previously unrecognized Universal Repelling Force, originating in all Matter and projecting across space at the velocity of light'.

Einstein's cosmological constant force does not eliminate or ignore the concept of gravitational attraction (the concept of a pulling force), but rather joins it. The repelling force and the impelling force are found co-existentially, side by side. The impelling force of gravity binds the universe together. The cosmologically constant repelling force of Lambda is Einstein's answer to Newton's candidly asked, previously unanswered

139 - Contents

Page 141: Total Field Theory

question of why a universe full of impelling bodies doesn't collapse on itself. Fact#8

Lambda. /\ The Cosmological Constant. A repelling force acting across space out of material bodies; proportionate in strength and intensity to the mass value of its material source (particle/charge). At a personal meeting with Hubble and others, Einstein was persuaded by the prevailing purveyors of what came to be universally considered - and mirthfully called - the big bang theory; to consider the *Cosmological Constant a mistake on his part; *said to be a repelling force acting exactly like and with gravity; except in the opposite direction; the strength of which increases instead of decreasing with distance, preventing the collapse of a universe of impelling (mutually attracting) bodies. At the unexpected discovery that the spatial universe is expanding (Silpher's discovery, 1912-27; Hubble's law, 1931), Einstein's Cosmological Constant Force was dismissed as superfluous. It was 'resolved' - the (spatial) universe did not collapse on itself because it was expanding.

140 - Contents

Page 142: Total Field Theory

Einstein was thereafter persuaded to call it 'the biggest blunder of my life'; as indeed this record takes accented note of agreement.

It's Still the Same Old Story, continued: The record can only very respectfully agree with Dr. Einstein's theory; as usual; while all others have grown weary. Abandoning the Cosmological Constant to the Friedman-Lemaitre-Hubble-Robertson (no relation to this author) -Walker model of an expanding - Big Bang originated-universe was indeed the biggest blunder of Einstein's life.

We will return to that redoubtably pensive consideration in a moment, but now this (I thought I told you never to play that song again, Sam.?): While a follow-through of reinstatement awaits anyone who pursues documentation of what happens when one objectively over-rules the subjective dismissal of the abundantly proven, objective concept of expanding matter: On the *chronically myopic premise that it is 'self-apparently' not happening.

Einstein's abandonment of his own Cosmological Constant - Unified Field - Theory is much controversied. On the other hand, they

141 - Contents

Page 143: Total Field Theory

aren't talking much about how Einstein was back to and working on his abandoned Unified Field; to the time of his death, in May, of '55.

“It is well known to students of high school algebra that it is permissable to divide both sides of an equation by any quantity, provided that this quantity is not zero. However, in the course of his proof Einstein had divided both sides of one of his intermediate equations by a complicated expression, which in certain circumstances, could become zero (‘at the slightest provocation’)...

“In the case, however, when this expression becomes equal to zero, Einstein’s proof does not hold, and (mathematician) Friedmann realized that this opened a whole new world of time-dependent universes; expanding, collapsing, and pulsating ones. “Thus Einstein’s original gravity equation was correct, and changing it was a mistake. Much later, when I was discussing cosmological problems with Einstein, he remarked that the introduction of the cosmological term was the biggest blunder he ever made in his life. But the ‘blunder’, rejected by Einstein, and the cosmological constant denoted by the Greek

142 - Contents

Page 144: Total Field Theory

letter /\, rears its ugly head again and again and again.” - George Gamow, GRAVITY, p. 270

The so called ‘ugly head’ of the Outlawed Truth:

“The cosmological constant has now a secure position... Not only does it unify the gravitational and electromagnetic fields, but it renders the theory of gravitation and its relation to space-time measurement so much more illuminating and indeed self evident, that return to the earlier view is unthinkable. I would as soon think of reverting to Newtonian Theory as of dropping the cosmological constant.” - Sir Arthur Eddington, THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE, p. 24

“I can see no reason to doubt that the observed recession of the spiral nebulae is due to cosmic repulsion, and it is the effect predicted (in 1919) by Relativity Theory which we were hoping to find. Many other explanations have been proposed - some of them rather fantastic (* ‘tired light’, ‘the big bang’, ’dark matter’, ‘super-strings’) - and there has been a great deal of discussion which

143 - Contents

Page 145: Total Field Theory

seems to me rather pointless. In this, as in other developments of scientific exploration, we must recognize the limitations of our present knowledge and be prepared to consider revolutionary changes.” - Sir Arthur Eddington, pp. 89 - 90, A TREASURY OF SCIENCE (Harlow Shapley publishers)

Long ago, this author noted that Einstein's designation for the repelling force inherent to universal gravitation is Lambda (Also, by apparent coincidence, the Aztec calendar's key symbol: /\ <repeated 9 times in a circle around the Aztec calendar>; translating to: "4-motion")… Shaped, not unlike a kind of transversely considered axe; also the shape of a pizza-pie-charted slice. So designated; so named. Godfathered by Albert - 'the Axe' - Einstein. An affectionate if levititious term for the Maestro of gravity.

144 - Contents

Page 146: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Four photostatatic copies of a quarter for every counterfeit dollar in change-seeker. At yore command. A 4-D chicken in every pot. An improved world, beyond Shake'n Bake. (Old Mack. He's back?)

A rash, sleep-disturbing look (in black & white) at Einstein's 4-Dimensional Geodesics. This discussion is rapidly approaching its close. Before it closes, I wish to cite another

145 - Contents

Page 147: Total Field Theory

accordance of the General Theory; which states that a thrown baseball or a fired bullet does not actually describe a curved or parabolic path to the earth, when projected horizontally above its surface. Instead, they actually move in straight lines which only appear to be curves and parabolas.

The reason for this says Einstein, is that, 'What is 4-Dimensionally straight gives the illusion of being curved or parabolic when projected on the 3 recognized Dimensions Of Space'.

These quasi 3-D parabolas and curves which are not really parabolas and curves, but instead are 4-D straight lines, are called 'geodesics'.

Einstein's geodesic account of gravity is that, 'Matter causes the 4-D Space-Time continuum to curve in the area surrounding it'. This fact is formally referred to as, 'Einstein's postulate of the 4-D Space-Time metric'.

If we find this Einsteinian description of gravitation vague, it is simply because it is indeed a vague description, yielding small conceptual compromise when compared with

146 - Contents

Page 148: Total Field Theory

the familiar if mysterious 'tug' of Classical Newtonian gravity.

One may question, what does Relativity mean when it accounts for gravity by referencing the 4-D Space-Time metric and the curving of the 4-D Space-Time Continuum? And how does this 4-D Space-Time Continuum cause bodies to descend, or geodesically appear to descend?

The 'answer' is that physicists do not understand the identity of Einstein's 4th Dimension; since space-time is one of the many effects of the 4th Dimension, it is not understood or recognized what the geodesic gravitational curvature of space-time is either. (The latest popular interpretation of this enigma is that 'there is no gravity' - only the 'curvature of the 4-D space time continuum'; the explanation for which remains as mysterious now as it was when it was perceived as gravity.)

“The General Theory (of Relativity) presented a completely altered view of gravitation. It is viewed as a property of space rather than as a force between bodies. As a result of the presence of matter, space becomes a curve and bodies follow the line of least resistance.

147 - Contents

Page 149: Total Field Theory

These 4-D lines are called ‘geodesics’.” - Isaac Asimov, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON’S GUIDE TO SCIENCE

The false enigma is resolved in recognition that the entire physical frame of reference is - 4-Dimensionally - enlarging, pinning the fans to the bleachers, all the cars to the asphalt in the parking lot, the city accommodating the ball park, and the omni-directionally expanding planet the city rests upon: rising up to create the illusion that the apparently curving baseball trajectory - which is actually moving in a straight line ('geodesic') - appears to be moving in a parabolic arc. When a test object is projected straight up in the air, it does not slow down, turn around and return to the catcher; no indeed. The catcher and the ground, rise up to overtake and impact the test object. “Time… is essentially a moving proposition, and we must perforce move with it.”- Paul R. Heyl, SPACE, TIME & EINSTEIN

Here's what false authority says of Einstein's 4-D geodesic: "We cannot visualize such a curved space, because humanity is not four dimensional."

148 - Contents

Page 150: Total Field Theory

- The LIFE Science Library's UNIVERSE, p. 179

Neither will it ever be visualized, until Matter is recognized to be 4-Dimensionally expanding; as simply illustrated here and affluently verified throughout this mere historical - previously unrecognized - review.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

“Impact and apparent ‘return’ of projectile, after being fired at MOMENT ‘A’. Acceleration of earth generates illusion of ‘curved’ parabola and ‘descending’ projectile.”4-D MASS-FIELD STRAIGHT-LINE GEODESIC (Back to Euclidean geometry.) Fact#9.

149 - Contents

Page 151: Total Field Theory

“The General Theory (of Relativity) presented a completely altered view of gravitation. It is viewed as a property of space rather than as a force between bodies. "As a result of the presence of matter, space becomes a curve and bodies follow the line of least resistance." These 4-D lines are called ‘geodesics’.” - Isaac Asimov, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON’S GUIDE TO SCIENCE

-----------------------

The Father of Experimental Science, Galileo, proved that Aristotle was wrong when the latter surmised that heavier objects, fall faster in descent, than lighter objects, when dropped from the same height at the same time, above the earth's surface. It does seem logical. It just doesn't happen to be true. Everyone who is anyone in physics today, falls on hocus pocus, to make this annoying fact go away. Reduce it to a trivial matter of no - ho hum – importance; whereas,

150 - Contents

Page 152: Total Field Theory

it is a major, unresolved enigma in theoretical physics. It is often falsely held up, either as a non-issue, or as a (falsely) resolved issue.

Galileo is said to be the first to make and note proof of that unexpected - ever since, bitterly disappointing - fact of reality - being the universal rate of descent of all objects in free fall, regardless of their mass values (in the absence of air resistance). 16 (32) feet per second squared, for bodies descending on or near the surface of the earth.

151 - Contents

Page 153: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

152 - Contents

Page 154: Total Field Theory

Much (low key, back stage) concern has been given to Galileo's unarguable fact of descending bodies in a gravitational field; ever since it was proven. Especially after Newton made a law of gravity that does indeed dictate: the heavier object should indeed descend faster than the lighter - less massive - object... Because, according to Newton's laws, there should inevitably be a greater mutual attraction between, say, a descending cannonball and the earth, than between a descending bb shot and the earth. The (ironic) mystery is frequently and glibly said to be resolved in the fact of the coincidence of inertial and gravitational mass values intersecting at the same qualitatively accelerating coordinates.

An obligatory description of the unanticipated and astonishing coincidence is not any explanation of the still completely unexplained *coincidence... By definition - like gravity and for exactly the same reason - *not understood (and stonewalled) by the scientific- academic status quo: representatives of which all too often are found pretending an understanding of that which they do not understand. Furthermore,

153 - Contents

Page 155: Total Field Theory

falsely representing what they (often capriciously - with all authoritative gravity) tragicomically misrepresent.

That is to say, a cannonball, according to Newton's Law, should (is supposed to) fall faster than a descending bb shot. The cannonball does not fall faster than descending bb shots or grains of sand or a leaping pod of airborne Blue whales. Everything falls at the same rate of acceleration, regardless of its mass value: *in the absence of air resistance...

Chapter Seven THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE: INERTIA, GRAVITY & E=MC2

*This last qualification is important; there are many novice critics who aggressively introduce 'terminal velocity' of descending object in free fall above the earth's surface as being 120 m.p.h., which is true, the critic sums up the argument by adding that if the earth is truly accelerating - expanding ever faster to rise up and meet apparently descending objects, then there wouldn't be a terminal velocity, and free falling objects 'would accelerate', instead of reaching 'TV' - terminal velocity - a free falling

154 - Contents

Page 156: Total Field Theory

parachutist before the chute is deployed, for example. All of this is to remind any such critic that terminal velocity limits the free falling object, due to air resistance: in the absence of air resistance the descent rate does in fact accelerate in corroboration with the 'proposed' (abundantly proved) accelerating expansion of the earth.

Proclaiming that inertial mass resistance (in allegedly unmoving space) to gravity (in descent time) exactly cancels out the gravity: does not explain why the allegedly unrelated (space and time) values are equal. Inertial values always (without explanation) proportionately canceling out what would be the difference between inertial and gravitational mass values... Einstein's *General Principle is the only functional solution to this (The descending objects are not really falling at all.) It continues: *unemployed.

“It was Einstein’s feeling about the form which the laws of nature should take that guided him. It led him to question a certain coincidence in Newtonian Law which, all too conveniently in his opinion, made everything come out right. This was the perfect balance

155 - Contents

Page 157: Total Field Theory

between the mass of a body, considered as a source of gravity in Newton’s Gravitation Law, and the mass of a body as a measure of inertia in Newton’s Laws of Motion. “According to the last, the amount of force necessary to change the motion of a body depends on its mass; a heavy object has a greater inertia than a lighter one and therefore is harder to move, or to slow down. To this law there was, apparently, an exception: the case of falling. Instead of falling more slowly, a heavy object reaches the same acceleration as a lighter one. Newton (*allegedly) accounted for this with his Law of Gravitation, which states that the attractive force exerted on one body by another increases with the mass of the attracted body. Thus, most conveniently, the force of gravitation always is exactly sufficient to overcome the inertia of a body so that all bodies fall at the same speed. “This perfect balance, this same mass constant which appeared in two different roles, looked to Einstein a bit suspicious, a bit forced. It should not be necessary to bring in a coincidence of this sort in order to explain the universe; God did not present such malicious complexities.

156 - Contents

Page 158: Total Field Theory

“He began to wonder whether the (*popularly perceived) distinction between inertial and gravitational forces might not be artificial. Could motion which was due to what Newton called ‘gravity’, in fact be distinguished from motion due to what he called ‘inertia’? It could not be, Einstein found, after he had made an analysis of experiments which might be done in answer to the question, the distinction was artificial. It had no experimental support and therefore - according to the rule: ‘If you cannot relate it to measurement, you do not know it’ - the distinction had (has) no place in a physical theory.” - Barbara Lovett Cline, THE MEN WHO MADE A NEW PHYSICS, p.p. 184 - 5

“A defect (of Newtonian Classical Mechanics) also eliminated (resolved) only by the General Theory of Relativity, lies in the fact that there is no reason given by the mechanics itself for the equality of the gravitational and inertial mass of the material point.” - Albert Einstein, OUT OF MY LATER YEARS.

Newton was fully aware of the unexplained, hauntingly unresolved problem: the functional intersection of inert and heavy mass values. Describing this coincidence too often passes as

157 - Contents

Page 159: Total Field Theory

explanation for this coincidence; which falsely currencied description is no explanation at all.

According to Aristotelian intuition and Newton's laws, heavier objects should indeed, fall faster. They don't.

Instead: Everything in free fall on or near earth invariably descends at exactly the same rate (in a vacuum. Sans air resistance). Repeat: Einstein's General Principle: is the only recognizable explanation for this.

At the turn of the 19th century, a Russian scientist, Roland Von Eotvos, pursued finding a difference in descent rates of heavier and lighter objects. A difference which is supposed to be there, and isn't. Eotvos, was inspired to achieve technological measurement of differences in descent time for variously light and heavy falling objects, down to a billionth of a second (A nanosecond). He could find no variants in rates of descent (in time) for variously massed test objects (in space). No difference in descent rates - gravitational time from inertial space; uniformly perceived as unrelated - of comparatively lighter and

158 - Contents

Page 160: Total Field Theory

heavier objects has ever been measured; to date.

The author (Truly Yours) submits that no difference will ever be found. Due to the more than coincidence - but rather the identity - of the fact that apparently descending objects are not really falling at all. The ever-expanding earth, matter of factly rising up to 4 dimensionally overtake and meet - make contact with - apparently falling bodies/objects.

(Upon occasions of free falling objects being overtaken and struck by, then to be inertially pinned down upon the earth's surface, present day science does not recognize the consequent gravitational fulfillment of the scientific definition for 'work'. May it suffice to clarify for the moment, that contemporary theoretical physics does not acknowledge and consequently does not employ the advantage of comprehending and accounting for a proper understanding of 'objects at rest', while constantly acted upon by gravity: the unidentified 'force' - F; on the earth's surface. That is, such objects are perceived and conceptualized as 'not moving'. Whereas, the scientific definition for 'work' requires motion ,

159 - Contents

Page 161: Total Field Theory

which, in the case of the ever-accelerating 4-D space-time continuum and the – perpetually - prevailing dynamics of the General <and Special> Theory of Relativity, is not recognized or acknowledged. Meanwhile 'force' is defined in several categories of motion, none of which are attributed to 'objects at rest' on the earth's surface <for example> in a gravitational field; all of which definitions are fulfilled. Not only in the inertial resistance to the acceleration of earth's surface upon the 'object at rest', but also and importantly, the - perpetual – omni-directional, accelerating enlargement of the - whatever - test object, itself...)

The ('Impossible') reason all objects (appear to) descend at the same rate of acceleration. Fact #10.

“Objects of such different nuclear constitution as aluminum and gold fall with accelerations that agree to better than one part in 10-11, according to Roll, Krotkov, and Dick (1964), one of the most important null experiments in all physics. Individual molecules fall in step, too, with macroscopic objects (Estermann, Simpson and Stern - 1935; and so do individual neutrons (Dabbs, Harvey, Paya and Horstmann - 1965), individual electrons

160 - Contents

Page 162: Total Field Theory

(Wittborn and Fairbank - 1967), and individual mu mesons (Beall - 1970).” - GRAVITATION, pp 13 - 16, Misner, Thorne and Wheeler.

"A defect (*in the Newtonian Classical system of 3-D mechanics) eliminated only by the introduction of the General Theory of Relativity, lies in the fact that there is no reason given by mechanics (*The Newtonian system) itself for the equality of the gravitational and inertial mass of the material point." - Albert Einstein, OUT OF MY LATER YEARS, p.71

"*In a neutron (cyclotron) experiment, a beam of fast neutrons close to that of the speed of light was shot into a moderator block, the emerging neutrons were observed to rain down from the block with about the same speed as rain droplets fall". - George Gamow, GRAVITY, p. 145 “The most dramatic of all early tests of the general theory took place in 1919 during a total eclipse of the sun. Einstein had reasoned as follows: if an elevator in interstellar space were pulled upward with an accelerating velocity, a light beam traveling from side to

161 - Contents

Page 163: Total Field Theory

side inside the elevator would bend down in a parabolic path. This would be regarded as an inertial effect, but according to the general theory, one can make the elevator a fixed frame of reference and view the curving of the beam as a gravitational effect. Gravity, then, is capable of curving light beams.”- Martin Gardner, RELATIVITY FOR THE MILLION, p. 110

162 - Contents

Page 164: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

“A beam of light projected horizontally over the earth's surface, 'falls' at the same rate as any

163 - Contents

Page 165: Total Field Theory

other test object. Only the hyper-speed of light sustains an apparently straight line, which is actually slightly parabolic, in accordance with slower moving - horizontally projected test objects, with more easily measured arcs. - KBR, TOTAL FIELD THEORY

Proving yet once again, gravity is the 4th dimension.

Reality Check, continued: As regards any question of, 'Why didn't Einstein say gravity is the 4th Dimension'? He did, and categorically. Einstein may have said and proved that gravity is the 4th Dimension much more eloquently and elaborately; much more absolutely than I or anyone else ever will.

We could reference an abundance of Einsteinian non-mathematical quotes at this time, quotes (many of which are included in this TOTAL FIELD THEORY presentation) - in other words - finding gravity the 4th Dimension. Instead, at this time and in the name of abbreviation, we'll reference what is literally the best-known mathematical formula in the world. The direct, non-mathematical

164 - Contents

Page 166: Total Field Theory

translation of which irrevocably proves - as it always has - that gravity is the 4th Dimension.

The formula is E=MC2. The direct non-mathematical translation of which is: 'Energy equals Matter times the speed of light, squared'. In grade school, I began to hear other students ask a question which I have since then learned is also familiar to many others; that question being: "In the formula 'E=MC2', why is C (light; field energy) squared (Out of M < Mass/Matter/ Particle>; which is perceived as a static, non-expanding, non-field)?"

I may have asked the question myself, but I knew less of mathematics than I do now. But others did ask that question, and that is understandable enough. The teacher's (ubiquitous) answer, which I have also learned since then is familiar to many others, was not so understandable. That (alleged) 'answer' being: 'It (C squared) actually isn't necessary'.

This answer, it will not surprise some of you to know, is quite standardized as a response to the question, 'Why is C squared, in the formula E=MC2?'

165 - Contents

Page 167: Total Field Theory

All are implored not to take my word for this. Simply ask the next physicist or mathematician you happen in to. If you pursue this question, you're apt to get that answer or its equivalent. I had no understanding of mathematics whatsoever, and yet it still left me and many others wondering: 'If in fact it isn't necessary, then why did Einstein include it in the formula?'

One may again reasonably ask, 'What is the speed of light squared from?' Of course the only answer is, 'The speed of light (C - celeritas constant) is squared from (out of) Matter'.

Smoke on The Perrier: Affixed to that familiar explicit statement made by Einstein, is the familiar implicit statement - 'but it isn't necessary'.

Light energy is acknowledged to be, to say the least, expanding. Specifically, it is very accurately measured, originally in 1887 by Michelson & Morley, to do so at 186,282 miles-per-second. *Light energy is also acknowledged to be qualitatively identical to *Matter energy; *their differences being only their densities - light

166 - Contents

Page 168: Total Field Theory

being much more thinly distributed and tenuous than matter. This is proven in the statement 'E=M' of the formula 'E=MC2, originally published by Einstein in 1906. Light energy or electromagnetism is furthermore acknowledged to invariably originate within and expand-out-of *MatterEnergy - *generator of all spaces and times.

On the other hand, MatterEnergy is not acknowledged to be expanding. Quite the contrary. Matter is unanimously agreed to be static and non-expanding.

Digressing To Reality, Geometric & Algebraic Law: In the formula E=MC2 we have the acknowledged dynamical omni-directional expansion of electromagnetic or light energy, squared from presumably static/non-expanding MatterEnergy. As long as there are those who demand and deny proof of the 4-Dimensional MassField, there will also be those who fail or refuse to recognize the accumulative achievements of historical and contemporary Academic Physical Science - and, the lessons of Algebra 101. If all the Nobel laureates in the world gather together to agree that any entity

167 - Contents

Page 169: Total Field Theory

acknowledged and agreed to be dynamically expanding, can be algebraically squared from any other entity which is agreed to be static and non-expanding (exactly such a gathering exists, and has existed since 1906): what is established in such an assemblage of authority is that, none among these mortar-boarded multitudes has possession of the mathematical ability required to pass the seventh grade. Fact # 11.

Chapter Eight THE BIG BANG IS WRONG. THE SIGHT & SOUND OF THE ‘INCOMPREHENSIBLE’ 4th DIMENSION

Einstein's 'renowned formula' E=MC2 proves again that Universal Matter is literally, constantly and dramatically expanding. Clipping right along on this planet at 32 feet per second squared. The Causative Source of the 4-Dimensional Space-Time Continuum: a dimension of time, and motion (are synonymous - time being the interval between two or more events <in space>).

168 - Contents

Page 170: Total Field Theory

An interim of levity about 4-D gravity: The bespectacled scientific malrepresentatives proclaim with all professionalism, that their 4-D spectacles are unfindable; that their sensory optical prescription is immeasurable. Unrefractionable. Even unimaginably out of sight. The 4th dimension: officially proclaimed to be nowhere in the measurable light, or the sensual realm of touch, taste, hearing or sight, in or out of italics and/or parentheses. Big Brother can't find the 4th dimension anywhere, 'because humanity is not four dimensional'.

Mr. Science is out to isolate gravity waves. Dr. Graviton Livingston is attempting to locate someone who presumes enough to find himself, and what he emptily purports to be in search of. Lost on the North African river of denial. The Star Optometrist has contracted a posse with Warner Brothers to polish-off both lenses on his misplaced spectacles.

Disregarding the descent of free falling objects, the weight (and inert mass value) of everything; the orbiting of the planets - and all other orbits with and without punctuation.

169 - Contents

Page 171: Total Field Theory

('The 4th D cannot be seen, felt, or imagined'. - The 'scientific consensus'...

'If science was a democracy, the world would still be flat or square with the universe revolving around it every 24 hours' - Anon)

The inescapable sounds of gravity . Rhythm songs of the 4-D space-time continuum. Anything round and rolling, especially metal coins and platters, glass and/or stone, that's allowed to slow down, fall over, and settle, audibly rocking, oscillating, rolling and rotating downwardly, audibly accelerating ever-faster toward a quick stop on a hard surface.

THE EVERYDAY SOUND and SIGHT of 4-D ACCELERATION (Is The Audio-Visual music & rhythm of Gravity) A tabled or floored coin, dinner plate or serving tray on a roll, slowing down to a coil of orbitally circling around its own accelerating drum roll, finally and abruptly settling down to a quick-stop, in the making of a gravitationally resounding, perfectly spiral shaped nest. Physically rolling and sounding out an accelerating spiral, while roundly resonating the rhythmically accelerating part. (What?)

170 - Contents

Page 172: Total Field Theory

The same harmonious polka may be harkened in a characteristically accelerating rocking motion, from any number of utensils, tools or spherical objects, rocking (to & fro) on solid hard kitchen sink or floored surfaces - the commonplace sight and sound of that which is adamantly pontificated as 'immeasurable', 'invisible', 'non-mathematically inaccessible, and 'unimaginable' (What?): the song of an errant hubcap settling down on the asphalt all by its rolling and rotating self; where (By and by; sooner or later) everything in present tense, continuously and collectively arrives from the past, squared. The sound, shape - and measurable sight - of materially manifest gravity, an everyday, globally ubiquitous occurrence (You dropped something?): the reputedly 'immeasurable, unimaginable' 4-D space-time continuum.

Heat flows downhill; ever smaller.Whereas, events flow uphill; ever larger. Entropic universal heat death is not as a conceptual dogma and/or social obsession, meaningfully derived from the 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics. Any more than the 4-D space-time continuum can be excluded as the explanation for a steady state theory and the

171 - Contents

Page 173: Total Field Theory

long withheld improvement over the incumbent, 4th dimension abolishing big bang gangers.

Are you seated comfortably?

A WORD ABOUT SIGNS OF THE TIMES. A Disinformational Time of The Signs: 'Time is a hallucination purveyed by the inventors of space.' - A (popularly deluded) bumper sticker mentality.

Actually: terrestrial time standards are based on astronomical motions of the planet(s) around the sun. A planetary year equals its completion of a 360 degree arc - round trip - about the sun (Which, itself is bound toward Vega). A month of 30 days is 1/12th of a year. A week is 1/4th of that month. A day is 1/7th of that week. An hour is 1/24th of a day. A minute is 1/60th of an hour. A second is 1/60th of a minute. Therefore, a second of time, for example is also 18 1/2 miles of space: traveled by the earth in its annual orbit around the sun… Sums up the bumper-sticker inspired hallucination. It’s about time.

172 - Contents

Page 174: Total Field Theory

Non-Absolute Relativistic 4-D space-time. What it is: Time, furthermore, in 4 dimensions, is shorter and faster in smaller, past (microcosmic) spaces, and slower (dilated) in future (macrocosmic) larger spaces; when compared to present time at any given moment of an observer in the eternal present: exactly between small fast space and large slow space. A square mile is not the same spatial size, when compared with itself; from the present: relative to (smaller, more dense) past or (larger, less dense) future 4-D expanding space.

Neither therefore, is 60 miles per hour (or 186,282 m.p.s.) always the same speed. Or a year, month, week, day, hour - or a second, always the same comparative duration. Proving that the value of time varies with the value of space it occurs in. Refer, relativistic time dilation. Slow time (Macrocosmic 'weak forces') occurring in relatively larger spaces; fast time (Microcosmically 'strong forces') occurring in relatively smaller and larger (earlier and later) spaces - the relativity of time values.

173 - Contents

Page 175: Total Field Theory

Refer: Einstein's 'non-absolute relative space', and 'non-absolute relative time'. For which, until here and now, there are not even any failed explanations.

Of course, in a 4-D universe, the value of time and space (4-D space-time) quite inevitably varies, from coordinate system to coordinate system. The speed of light for example, is ever-increasing, while remaining constant, relative to the coordinate system from which it originates and in which it is measured. The value of time being covariant with the smaller and larger - earlier and later - 4-D space-times it occurs and/or is measured in. Fact #12.

Now, to close with two brief considerations. At irregular intervals, the world press and scientific journals at large will report on contradictions and disqualifications of Einstein's theories. Modifications of the works of Newton and Einstein, for example, do correctly occur. Whereas, until the foundations of physical science represented by Newton and Einstein, for example, are replaced with some more improved system, the displacement of the work of the issued giants of science is confined

174 - Contents

Page 176: Total Field Theory

to whatever slight adjustment, accompanied by whatever dissertation.

Then, there are the ambitions of physicists attempting to discover, isolate or insulate gravity waves (Refer 'gravitons'). And yet, like the 4th Dimension, the only appropriate question regarding phenomenological gravity, is, 'Where is it not?' Yet still, Contemporary Physics and its mentors continue to brush aside electromagnetism (in the micro and macrocosms) in - high and low, large and small - probes, hunts, expeditions and searches for gravity waves (Where are they not? The bespectacled adventurers are wearing the corrective lenses they're frantically looking for… Refer, Dirac’s 1960 equation of ‘gravity waves’ with Planck’s constant h – a generally ignored equation: which finds gravity as electromagnetism. Refer, ‘unified field’).

"Although relativity theory replaces gravity by a geometrical warping of space-time, it leaves many basic questions unanswered. Does this warping take place instantaneously through space or does it propagate like a wave motion? Almost all physicists agree that the warping moves like a wave and that these waves travel with the speed of light. There is also good

175 - Contents

Page 177: Total Field Theory

reason to believe that gravity waves consist of tiny indivisible particles of energy called "gravitons." In 1969, Joseph Weber, at the University of Maryland, announced that his equipment, consisting of huge aluminum cylinders, had detected gravity radiation. It seemed to be coming from cataclysmic events at the center of the Milky Way. Since then, dozens of attempts have been made to confirm Weber's claim, some by physicists with detecting equipment more sensitive than Weber's. The results have been negative. The present consensus is that Weber misinterpreted his readings, and that gravity waves have not yet been observed (*Have not yet been proven beyond Dirac’s 1960 findings)...

“As for gravitons, no one has any knowledge of what a graviton is like, although many physicists are trying to invent theories that will predict some of its properties. Presumably it contains a tiny bit of space-time curvature, otherwise large numbers of gravitons would be unable to transmit curvature through space. At the moment the graviton, like the particle physicists' quark,' remains a hypothetical beast that physicists hope someday to capture."

176 - Contents

Page 178: Total Field Theory

- p. 106, THE RELATIVITY EXPLOSION, by Martin Gardner

Speaking of ‘hypothetical beasts’: (Why the opposition is out of 3-D time & space, continued:

WHY: THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG The Big Bang Universe has a (speculatively presumed super split second) beginning and a speculatively presumed (entropic heat death) ending.

Unlike the Steady State Theory; which for many substantial and eloquent reasons does not proffer a beginning or ending; which (Steady State Theory) was abandoned, because the (recently and unexpectedly discovered) proven expansion of the spatial universe must result; inevitably in the dissipation of occurring numbers (density) of objects occupying given units of space over extensively progressive periods of time. A Steady State Theory projects a general uniform density of space, rather than a dissipating space projected in a *Big Bang translation of Universal History.

Consider the more dense - relatively smaller - past; advancing into the increasingly less

177 - Contents

Page 179: Total Field Theory

dense and ever-enlarging future. *Big Bang dictated Space always becoming more dissipated, 'thinning out' with ('big rip') increased passage of time in the spatially expanding, 'Big Bang'. Which is what is said to inevitably result when the dissipating universe of the present and future, is back-tracked into the conceptualized universal (consequently ever smaller and more dense) 3-D past...

Eventually intersecting very densely, when and where, due to tremendous gravitational pressures and resulting high temperatures: an explosion (*Big Bang) is said to have occurred. Proclaimed by the big bang gang to be the cause of the recently (and quite unexpectedly) discovered, spatially expanding universe - *therefore 'inevitably' thinning out with the passage of time (often said to be enroute a conceptually accompanying, imminent forthcoming, 'entropic heat death' - more recently termed, 'the big rip').

178 - Contents

Page 180: Total Field Theory

179 - Contents

Page 181: Total Field Theory

Big Bang Cosmology. Product of a desperately concocted (1927 emerged, Henry Silpher discovered, Edwin Hubble refined, Friedmann/Lemaitre generalized), ad hoc makeshift history. The big bang theory is ad hoc, in the sense that it was conjured up in hurried response to the unexpected discovery that the entire spatial universe is expanding (1927- '1931, Silpher-Hubble).

Back tracking the observed expansion through past time seems to find the observed expanding universe at a point of convergence - an intersecting point where all the matter of the universe was presumably joined in one singular 'cosmic egg.' What seems inevitably, to be ('therefore') an ending of space, ergo, 'beginning of space and time.' A 3-D space-monopolizing universal beginning.

"Our sun at the center of our solar system is just one star among billions in the Milky Way galaxy. Around us are billions and billions of galaxies. Where could this entire universe come from? Was it always this way or did the universe have a beginning? The church has always believed that the universe came from a moment of creation - a time when the universe began. Meanwhile, scientists developed two

180 - Contents

Page 182: Total Field Theory

theories: the Big Bang and the Steady State theories. In this century, science has come to understand how the universe began from a tiny point, fifteen billion years ago. No matter how incredible it sounds, it seems that the church's ideas of a moment of creation were right from the beginning."- STEPHEN HAWKING'S UNIVERSE, Volume I, Program II: The Big BangCopyright 1997

Yet, there is, in astrophysical proven and agreed upon fact: no common center from which the spatially expanding universe recedes. Combined with the *1998 observed dynamic that the expanding universe is accelerating (*issued as early as 1975-6) - not a quality of any kind of beginning explosion; but more a feature of a repelling force ('Cosmological Constant'), acting across space out of material bodies, becoming more dynamic with distance. Fact #13.-------------

The Editors, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 415 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017

*14 May 1976

"An Accelerating Universe?" "...that most reasonable observational data.... fit closely all

181 - Contents

Page 183: Total Field Theory

models to which the expansion is accelerating. "The prediction of accelerating expansion is contrary to expectation... "something must be terribly wrong."..."The net forces between (receding) galaxies really are repulsive (Re: 'Hubble's Law - the more distant a given stellar or galactic light source the faster it's rate of recession from the point of observation". Re: Einstein's Cosmological Constant <repelling force acting parallel to and in the opposite direction as the popular concept of 'Newtonian impelling force>, a force different from others in that its velocity increases - rather than decreases, with distance.)”

- SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 'Science and the Citizen', December 1975, James E. Gunn and Beatrice M. Tinsley.

-----------------

'I point out this apparent conflict with the understanding that Gunn and Tinsley concluded "...the prediction of accelerating expansion is contrary to expectation... and that something must be terribly wrong."

Especially so if "...the net forces between (receding) galaxies... really are repulsive... and if gravitational values really are "equivalent to and synchronous with inertial acceleration

182 - Contents

Page 184: Total Field Theory

values beyond a billionth of a second and the technical ability to measure any difference" (THE NEW GRAVITY <Is The 4th Dimension>, April 1976, Kent B. Robertson). 'Is it possible we are overlooking a rather obvious consideration, concerning the real nature of 'gravity?' Very Truly Yours,

David F. Sicks, Anchorage, Alaska cc - Mr. Kent Robertson( Mr. David F. Sicks received no response.)

183 - Contents

Page 185: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Revisionary BB Politics - 11-11-2007, 05:22 PM (Posted by K. B. Robertson <RascalPuff – ‘RP’>, on ToeQuest) Recently in this Theory of Everything internet enclave, the following - exemplary - excerpt was included – in bold red lettering - in a post by the unarguably venerable neutralino:

"Note that nowhere in the BB theory does it state 'the universe exploded into existence', or in fact anything to do with explosions!!"

184 - Contents

Page 186: Total Field Theory

This conceptual posturing is merely an example of the fact that the big bang theory has evolved from it's inception as a 'beginning explosion', into a Standard Theorist bunker of denials that any 'original explosion' commenced what is now popularly referenced as 'The Expanding Universe'.

Proclamations that there is no original explosion associated with the big bang theory have become the status quo. When someone proclaims or implies otherwise, they are promptly described as a 'novice', and 'corrected', as exemplified by the above quoted statement by neutralino.

This controversy leads to the question of where the big bang theory originated, and, how it was described.Here is the google acquired answer to that question…

http://www.catholiceducation.org/art...ce/sc0022.html

“In the winter of 1998, two separate teams of astronomers in Berkeley, California, made a similar, startling discovery. They were both

185 - Contents

Page 187: Total Field Theory

observing supernovae — exploding stars visible over great distances — to see how fast the universe is expanding. In accordance with prevailing scientific wisdom, the astronomers expected to find the rate of expansion to be decreasing, Instead they found it to be increasing — a discovery which has since “shaken astronomy to its core” (Astronomy, October 1999).

“This discovery would have come as no surprise to Georges Lemaitre (1894-1966), a Belgian mathematician and Catholic priest who developed the theory of the Big Bang. Lemaitre described the beginning of the universe as a burst of fireworks, comparing galaxies to the burning embers spreading out in a growing sphere from the center of the burst. He believed this burst of fireworks was the beginning of time, taking place on “a day without yesterday. “After decades of struggle, other scientists came to accept the Big Bang as fact. But while most scientists — including the mathematician Stephen Hawking — predicted that gravity would eventually slow down the expansion of the universe and make the universe fall back toward its center, Lemaitre believed that the

186 - Contents

Page 188: Total Field Theory

universe would keep expanding. He argued that the Big Bang was a unique event, while other scientists believed that the universe would shrink to the point of another Big Bang, and so on. The observations made in Berkeley supported Lemaitre’s contention that the Big Bang was in fact “a day without yesterday.” When Georges Lemaitre was born in Charleroi, Belgium, most scientists thought that the universe was infinite in age and constant in its general appearance. The work of Isaac Newton and James C. Maxwell suggested an eternal universe. When Albert Einstein first published his theory of relativity in 1916, it seemed to confirm that the universe had gone on forever, stable and unchanging.”

Neutralino’s response:Re: Revisionary BB Politics - 11-11-2007, 06:38 PM “Ok I'm ready to eat a tiny slice of humble pie now, RP. My response that you've quoted in red is not correct. I can't remember saying that last night, and have no idea why I would do, but I did (I checked).

So here's my stance on the big bang. Many people say that there was an "explosion" at

187 - Contents

Page 189: Total Field Theory

some point in space, or that the universe was created from a single point in space. This, clearly, is incorrect (since the universe consists of the spacetime of the universe).

However, one can say that there was an explosion that created spacetime and that is why the universe is expanding in the way we see today. The important things to notice are that firstly, this explosion did not take place in a specific point in spacetime, since this would imply a centre, which contradicts the cosmological principle. Secondly, we note that we cannot run the clock back to time zero and see an infinitely dense point of matter. Thirdly, this explosion is not like any explosion that we would imagine. When we think of explosions, we think of fragments of something being thrown further into space. However, this explosion was an explosion on the universe itself which created the universe (if that makes sense.)

Anyway, talking about explosions, whilst technically not incorrect, gets confusing. I would much rather take the stance that the big bang theory states that the universe was once far more dense than it is today.

188 - Contents

Page 190: Total Field Theory

So, I apologise to you, RascalPuff, and to anyone else who read my incorrect views.

[As an aside, in future it may be better to get a reference from a non-catholic source if discussing workings and successes of a catholic priest!]”

The reversionary transition came about, because there is no common center from which the expanding universe, recedes. The dynamic structure of the expanding universe is such, that the recession of light sources is moving directly away from the observer, in direct line of sight, no matter what location the expansion is observed. 'The center is everywhere'. This is not the dynamic signature of an explosion - especially when it is learned that the expansion is proceeding ever faster: accelerating.

On the other hand the described dynamics are the signature of a repelling force acting out of all material bodies, 'just like gravity', except, in the opposite direction. Refer, 'the Cosmological Constant'.

189 - Contents

Page 191: Total Field Theory

The Unabashed Reinstatement of the Cosmological Constant (Lambda), continued

Before and since the latest writing of this condensed (originally, 1959) presentation of Total Field Theory: Gravity is the 4th Dimension, the 'big bang' "theory" has been ambitiously renovated - unflinchingly retrieving the 'abandoned' Cosmological Constant from the round file - putting it back on the slate (refer 'LCDM' - Lambda Cold Dark Matter, and the regularly employed big bang employment of the term, 'cosmological constant', in those words...). Moreover, the ex parte big bang gang has nonchalantly declared that it doesn't - after all - need a common center from which it originates. Under these rearrangements, the covertly bewildered, usurped, big bang gangologists carry on with 'business as usual'...

Enter in google: 'Einstein was right after all - maybe'. Then <collectively> enter in google: cosmological constant lambda expanding universe big bang acceleration red shift dark energy dark matter Friedmann Lemaitre Robertson Walker, and draw your own conclusions about what's happened to

190 - Contents

Page 192: Total Field Theory

astrophysics and the big bang theory, especially since 1976 thru ‘98 and continuing. - K. B. Robertson 4/21/2007

The expansion is proven, dynamically structured as though the center (alleged origin of the big bang - said to be the beginning cause of the observed spatial expansion of the universe) is everywhere. No matter the location of any given observation point: the structural dynamics of the observed expanding universe are such that always the red-shift recession of the measurable surrounding universe (of receding objects) is: in direct line of sight; moving directly away from points of observation; wherever they are located. This is not a 3-dimensional signature. It is the 4-dimensionally prevailing status quo; establishing a structural expansion corroborating a physically and spatially expanding - steady state – universe, where the center is everywhere; as it is in fact observed to be. Proving every point of mass (charge/ disturbance; systems of combined particles) and its (their) generation of omni-directionally expanding electromagnetism and gravity: as

191 - Contents

Page 193: Total Field Theory

the collective cause and origin of the observed, red-shift measured expanding universe.

The Big Bang is categorically founded on a 3-D premise. In what is insisted to be an ‘acknowledged’ 4-D Universe. Refer, George Orwell's 1984 *DOUBLE-THINK & *NEWSPEAK (*two mutually conflicting parallel lines to infinity): endless gridlock.

The Big Bang imposed retroactive progression to the bygone past's intersection of three dimensions to a point of origin (the anticipated end of retroactively expanding space - traced backwards in time to an inevitable intersection and consequent point of beginning), does not apply to a four dimensional space-time continuum...

The past of which is progressively smaller, to endless 4-D infinity, when the observed, spatially expanding (Big Bang originated; 3-Dimensionally fixated) universe is traced backwards through past time, from the present. Back tracking the observed spatially expanding universe is popularly said by Big Bang advocates, to eventually arrive at an

192 - Contents

Page 194: Total Field Theory

intersection where space ends: in three dimensions.

There is no open argument against the omniscience of the four dimensional space time continuum here. It is simply and altogether excluded as a solution (refer option/ aka, ultimatum). The Big Bang Theory denies/excludes/ignores altogether here, what its double-talking perpetrators say they acknowledge (the 4th dimension)... Meanwhile, the Big Bang Theory becomes dissolute, when it comes in a functionally applied contact with the (Invisible, What?) four dimensional space-time continuum.

"Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things can easily attain an authority over us such that we forget their worldly origin and take them as immutably given. They are then rather rubber-stamped as a ‘sine-qua-non of thinking’ and an ‘a priori given’, etc. “Such errors make the road of scientific progress often impassable for long times. Therefore, it is not at all idle play when we are trained to analyze the entrenched concepts, and point out the circumstances that promoted

193 - Contents

Page 195: Total Field Theory

their justification and usefulness and how they evolved from the experience at hand. “This breaks their all too powerful authority. They are removed when they cannot properly legitimize themselves; they are corrected when their association with given things was too sloppy; they are replaced by others when a new system can be established that, for various reasons, we prefer." - Einstein, "Ernst Mach", Physikalishe Zeitschrift 17 (1916), 102; Collected Papers vol. 6, Doc. 29

(P.S. Consider the Big Bang adoption of the formerly orphaned & ostracized Cosmological Constant & Steady theories, in order to 'maintain' the desperately stricken, anemically perished 'big bang beginning', ok? Maybe no one will be watching them, while they deign to do it in the road... <'What big bang makeover?'> Oh yes. They've gone through the line w'out paying for the abducted CC ( /\ Lambda) and Steady State; so far, it - 'the normal adjustment' - continues to be no big shakes...)

Whereas, in four dimensions (when space-time is not excluded from the universe, as the Big Bang Theory - while alleging to

194 - Contents

Page 196: Total Field Theory

acknowledge the 4-D space-time continuum - excludes the 4th dimension altogether), past space goes on ever-smaller forever; smallness proceeding as endlessly as largeness: with the relativistic center (source of expansion) located everywhere in the occurrence of matter-field particles (without a spatial limitation at the falsely assumed and foreseen intersection of all matter, culminating in the alleged explosive <Big Bang> beginning); in the increasingly distant, ever smaller past to infinity, and growing ever larger forever in the increasingly distant future; to infinity.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

(Refer <the herein reinstated>: steady state theory.)

195 - Contents

Page 197: Total Field Theory

Chapter Nine REINSTATEMENT of STEADY STATE & UNIFIED FIELD THEORIES

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron ('disturbed area') in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation." - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE.

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

The Steady State Theory was abandoned because it was unable to explain how the universe would remain at a generally uniform density while at the same time becoming ever larger, spatially.

196 - Contents

Page 198: Total Field Theory

Hoyle-Bondi & Gold, at first (desperately; because everything else about the Steady State theory is an eloquently strong account of the observed, universal status quo) proposed the *'spontaneous creation of hydrogen' to maintain the required uniform density of their Steady State universe. This reparative course was later abandoned, mainly because it contradicts the law of Conservation of MassEnergy. Whereas, the four dimensional space time continuum requires no such *adjustment - an adjustment that does indeed (prohibitively) contradict the Law of Conservation of Mass Energy. Whereas: 'These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely'. - J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104(Hold that non-expansive - standing field of static - thought?

197 - Contents

Page 199: Total Field Theory

Exactly what the present day - indefinitely spreading - universe looks like: without the Big Bang. (By now it would have spread indefinitely: squared...)

198 - Contents

Page 200: Total Field Theory

----------------------------The below quote is extracted fromhttp://www.pbs.org/wnet/hawking/universes/html/univ_steady.html

199 - Contents

Page 201: Total Field Theory

"Proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle, the steady-state theory was based on an extension of something called the perfect cosmological principle. This holds that the universe looks essentially the same from every spot in it and at every time. (This applies only to the universe at large scales; obviously planets, stars, and galaxies are different from the space between them.)

“Obviously, for the universe to look the same at all times, there could have been no beginning or no end. This struck a philosophical chord with a number of scientists, and the steady-state theory gained many adherents in the 1950s and 1960s. How could the universe continue to look the same when observations show it to be expanding, which would tend to thin out its contents? Supporters of this cosmology balanced the ever-decreasing density that results from the expansion by hypothesizing that matter was continuously created out of nothing. The amount required was undetectably small—about a few atoms for every cubic mile each year.

200 - Contents

Page 202: Total Field Theory

“The steady-state theory began to wither in the 1960s. First, astronomers discovered quasars, the highly luminous cores of very distant galaxies. Because the vast majority of quasars lie exceedingly far away, their existence proves that the perfect cosmological principle cannot be true—the distant and therefore ancient universe is not the same as the younger universe nearby. The death knell for the theory sounded when radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered the cosmic microwave background, the leftover radiation from the Big Bang. *The steady-staters had no reasonable way to explain this radiation, and their theory slowly faded away as so many of its predecessors had."

*Whereas, in the 4-D matter-field universe, background radiation is simply understood as signals from an earlier, more dense epoch in the physically and spatially expanding universe.

The folly of Cal. Tech's Dr. H. P. Robertson applied 'spotted balloon' analogy… Where he specifically explains that the expanding balloon's surface represents the expansion of space and that the spots

201 - Contents

Page 203: Total Field Theory

represent matter in space, but the spots on the balloon are not to be thought of as painted on the balloon’s surface, because then the spots themselves would expand with the surface of the balloon, so Dr. H.P. Robertson carefully clarifies that the spots representing matter are to be thought of as 'raisins glued to the balloon's surface', so that the raisins do not expand with the space, since matter is not to be thought of as expanding… “If matter were expanding we would have no way of detecting the expansion, since everything would be expanding uniformly.”- Dr. H. P. Robertson, CalTech.

Meanwhile, the Steady State universe remains steady state because physical (4-D) matter is expanding along with expanding space; consequently space does not 'thin out' of material systems with the ongoing expansion of space. Ergo, the abandoned Steady State theory is reinstated; due to the expansion of corporeal matter itself - excluding any need for the (unacceptable) 'spontaneous creation of hydrogen'.

Moreover, the recent observations that the expanding universe (including matter itself) is accelerating, corroborates acceleration as

202 - Contents

Page 204: Total Field Theory

found in nature. Summarily, the - earlier, relatively more dense - Steady State theory is as much an explanation for the controversied background radiation, formerly thought to be exclusively explained by the big bang.

Manifest Natural Precedents for Accelerating Expansion: Very much on the order of 360 degree arcs of ripples (or pie-plate charted portions thereof) emanating from the center disturbance point on the surface of a pool of water. The newer, earlier ripples not only expanding, but also accelerating. Moving ever more swiftly; with the aging development of distance from center source of disturbance. Not only is qualified continuous expansion, colloquially and precisely found here (on the surface of water), but also acceleration - a ubiquitous, natural emergence of an expanding; accelerating system.

Some observers flatly deny acceleration of expanding water ripples: they are mistaken... It is traditionally verified in ripple tank studies that the further water-waves move from their geometric origin (center source of disturbance), the faster they expand, etcetera, ad dynamic infinitum. The expanding water

203 - Contents

Page 205: Total Field Theory

ripples are accelerating - moving ever-faster - and the structure of the concentric acceleration is accountable in the law of the inverse square.

The difference between expanding water ripples and expanding electromagnetism is that water ripples are expanding (accelerating) much more slowly than light (electromagnetism) and water ripples require a conducting medium, whereas light (apparently) does not (Refer Michelson & Morley’s interferometer experiments and Einstein’s conclusion that there is no ‘aether’

204 - Contents

Page 206: Total Field Theory

<conducting medium previously thought to vehicularize light waves>). Consider the following quotes from Guy Murchie’s (excellent reference book) Music Of The Spheres:

"... the famous Krakatoa (South Pacific island volcanic eruption generated) swells of 1883 were credited with heights well above one hundred feet, combined with length that grew to hundreds of miles and a speed no less than that of sound in air (approx. 720 miles per hour)." - p. 373, Guy Murchie, Music of the Spheres.

"Another curious characteristic of the (ship or boat) bow wave... is that, taken in the singular, it becomes concave forward, due to acceleration." - Guy Murchie, Ibid, p. 374

"... stern waves (on/of water, as from a ship or boat) accelerate in concave backward form..." - Ibid, p. 375

"... liquid waves possess acceleration..." - Ibid p. 376 .............................................

205 - Contents

Page 207: Total Field Theory

"The Accelerating Expansion of the Universe

“I’ve read in Scientific American and other places that the acceleration of the expansion of the universe is increasing, (possibly due to dark energy), first postulated by Einstein as the cosmological constant.

“This is the beginning of the end of all knowledge about what was and is. As space empties out, our galaxy-to-be will come to be surrounded by a total void, past which we can never see. It will be as in 1908, when scientists thought our galaxy constituted the entire universe, for the quickening expansion will pull galaxies apart faster than light, causing them to drop out of view. Beyond a certain event horizon, no matter or radiation will be able to reach us.

“In five billion years, although our sun will be a red giant, the Andromeda galaxy will loom large in the night sky for those who remain in our solar system, for our Local Group of galaxies will collapse into a single enormous SuperCluster of stars, but all the other billions of galaxies will disappear into an oblivion beyond the event horizon. We will once again

206 - Contents

Page 208: Total Field Theory

live in a supposed island universe. Even the CMBR will be so faint as to be undetectable.

“Even now, the view of the early universe has pretty much vanished." - Austin P. Torney 3/7/'08-------------

"On the other hand, Austin, when the acceleration of the spatial expansion of the universe is viewed in conjunction with - and as a result of - the accelerating material expansion, then we may have a 'steady state' universe.

('Return of the Steady State' www.newscientist.com/article/mg13718622.300-science-return-of-the-steady-state-universe )

Whaddaya think?" - K. B. Robertson, Ibid-------------

"Is it fair to say that the accelerated expansion of the space between me, you and Austin is responsible for proportionately retaining our bodies' density, or is it the accelerated expansion of the space within our bodies that is responsible for creating its mass?

207 - Contents

Page 209: Total Field Theory

“I just wanted to be clear on whether or not the relationship between mass and gravity is the same for mass and acceleration.

Thanks." - Raven Knight (aka, 'Nobody') Ibid--------------------

"Good question.

I think they're synonymous, Nobody.

It has to do with the electromagnetic field surrounding sub atomic charges.

The 'loop' of magnetism - exiting the northerly core and swinging around to enter the southerly core constitutes expansion from the north and contraction to the south, within and sustaining the same system.

Refer, 'conspansion' (contraction & expansion).

'Tao', 'YinYang'.

It may have to do with Dirac's 'particle' and 'anti-particle' - where the northern (exit/outward) hemisphere constitutes one, and the southern (entrance/inward) hemisphere constitutes the other (particle, and anti particle).

The result may be what causes the explosion Dirac predicted; in turn, perhaps being the

208 - Contents

Page 210: Total Field Theory

cause (if not the identity) of the 4-D expansion of the subjected system, en toto." - K. B. Robertson (aka, 'RascalPuff'), Ibid----------------------

"Perfectly clear answer, Rascal. Thank you.

I don't know if it's just me, but it seems like your discovery way back when (50's?) has influenced many folks. You've given me many missing pieces of the master puzzle."- Raven Knight, Ibid-----------------------

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In physics, the Dirac equation is a relativisticquantum

mechanical wave equation formulated by Paul Dirac in 1928 and provides a description of elementaryspin-½

particles, such as electrons, consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity. The equation demands the existence of antiparticles and actually predated their experimental discovery, making the discovery of the positron, the antiparticle of the electron, one of the greatest triumphs of modern theoretical physics. ...the Dirac equation was originally invented to describe the electron...

209 - Contents

Page 211: Total Field Theory

The Cause of 4-D Expansion, QM & Negative Inertia? Professor Paul Dirac's proposed anti-particle (electric charge, referred to as a 'particle') and its proposed explosion upon contact with a conventional 'particle' (electric charge), may be an ongoing event constituting the status quo of (4-D) reality as we experience it...

Consider a sphere such as a macrocosmic planet, the sun (any and all of the stars), or a microcosmic system such as an electron 'particle' (electromagnetic charge). Each generates a familiar, spider web shaped electromagnetic field, wherein the magnetic portion of that field emanates in a 'northerly' direction from the north pole of the issuedsphere, loops around it in a circular motion which suddenly is traveling in a southerly direction upon reaching and passing the ecliptic middle of the sphere.

210 - Contents

Page 212: Total Field Theory

211 - Contents

Page 213: Total Field Theory

The continuing loop completes a full (torus structured) circle around the planet, sun or electron that generates, maintains and sustains it; the magnetic field then entering the southern pole of it's given system of origin (planet, star, electron) to resume a northerly direction through the axial center of and relative to the polar system at issue. This described dynamic represents an ongoing cyle of magnetism generated by and emanating from, around, and back into the system that generates, maintains and sustains it. The sphere itself, en toto, is stabilized by a magnetic field which is constantly moving in opposite directions - northerly out of, then looping around to a southerly course, and back into and through the core of the issued spherical entity in a northerly direction, ad infinitum.

(Download PalTalk for free)

212 - Contents

Page 214: Total Field Theory

Expansion and contraction within and sustaining the same system - refer 'conspansion'.

The reverse of directions - from north to south - occurs at the ecliptic (equatorial bisection) of the issued, spherical electron,

213 - Contents

Page 215: Total Field Theory

planet or star Each given system is also emitting electrical energy in straight lines at right angles from the ('particle') system that the circular magnetic field is parallel to.

In accordance with Dirac’s findings in 1960, these magnetic directional reversals and electric discharges correspond to the occurrence of observed - right angle emitted - quantum emissions. In the four dimensional (tensor) setting that Einstein has assigned to all material systems; these two (northern and southern) hemispheres are oppositely interacting with each other ('as anti-particles'), apparently resulting in the Dirac-predicted explosion, evidently constituting the omni-directional expansion of 4-D systems. The omni-directional motion of electromagnetism may also account for the generation of negative inertia (the tendency to oppose force applied to it; in reference to Mach's principle) in every such individual system.

*Mach's principle submits that in an isolated space (bereft of any but one entity) an object would have no negative inertia.

214 - Contents

Page 216: Total Field Theory

The fields from isolated, individual charges look like this:

physics.bu.edu/~duffy/PY106/Electricfield.html

Whereas, in context of Matter in 4-D expansion, the apparent defect in Mach's principle is that an isolated positive charge is confined to it's location - exhibiting negative inertia (a tendency to remain at rest; resisting outside forces) - by the recoil of - it's own, inherent – omni-directionally expanding electrical energy.

The isolated negative charge is confined to its location - also exhibiting negative inertia (a resistance to outside forces) by the omni-directional influx of electrical energy. These are the causes of negative inertia. – * KBR*The upshot of "Mach's Principle" is approximately this: the inertia of a body is determined in relation to all other bodies in the universe (in short, "matter there governs inertia here"). Mach's principle apparently does not compensate for the consequence of omni-directional expansion of all matter from it's center.

215 - Contents

Page 217: Total Field Theory

Chapter Ten THE DIVISORY DILEMMA OF LARGE & SMALL FORCES

A positive charge omni-directionally emits an outgoing electric force, and, a negative charge omni-directionally absorbs an incoming electric force.

Sometimes opposites do attract, and sometimes they repel. Newton says gravity may be an impelling - or a repelling - force ('the gravitational alternative'). Einstein says gravity is - at least sometimes - a repelling force; adding furthermore that gravity may be both a repelling and an impelling force (refer, the 'cosmological constant').

Truly Yours tends to observe that gravity is usually a 4-D repelling force, on or near major gravitational masses (GR), and an impelling (aquatic, terrestrial and atomospheric) tidal force (for example) at greater distances (SR). Summarizing that, since Newton introduced what he fully acknowledged as a mysterious, occult force of gravitation, usually - but not stringently - to be thought of as an impelling force, this record sees no reason why Einstein

216 - Contents

Page 218: Total Field Theory

is disallowed from introducing a repelling force acting parallel to Newton's impelling force... Summing up a tandem repelling and impelling force, with each man offering major contributions to understanding the universe; neither of which men - or forces - are mutually exclusive.

The Albert-Isaac Electromagnetic apple

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

The dilemma of microcosmic and macrocosmic forces: The superfluously conflicting schools of thought (Circa 1900 thru 1930 and ever since) on Max Planck's - Helmholtz inspired, Rubens confirmed - Quantum Mechanics'... The 1897 dated observation of black body radiation led Planck to attempt to observe an

217 - Contents

Page 219: Total Field Theory

invariable increase in entropy, which resulted in null thought and laboratory experiments; leading to Planck's 1900 revision of Boltzmann's alternately continuous and discontinuous statistical interpretation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics (later paralleled by Heisenberg's Principle of Indeterminacy).

It is only obscurely known or recognized that, although there are indeed opposing - J.J. Thompson-electron-launched - arguments on this subject, Einstein and Planck were in the same camp, along with Schrödinger, regarding the much misunderstood 'problem' of microcosmic 'continuity' of dualistic wave-field theory, and 'discontinuity' of so called 'particles'.

Leading to an undrained, ever rising swamp of determinacy and indeterminacy, entanglement, water ripple and shotgun pellets rolling sideways and speeding linearly through vertical and horizontal slits, in the ever imposing shadow of assumptive continuous wave eclipsed by the anticipated, non-prevailing 'ultraviolet catastrophe' and the newly incumbent black body radiation - vocabularized in electrical theory and thermodynamics - introducing the circle of

218 - Contents

Page 220: Total Field Theory

broken lines forming a sought-after curve but still leading to an apparently non discardable discontinuous 'quantum leap', because energy in discontinuous portions cannot be infinitely divided… Establishing that radiant energy is not quantitatively infinite - in unequal units, Planck resolved that the frequency of the considered discontinuous wave is directly related to its duration, or more specifically, its length. This was unexpected because it defined a seemingly antithetical, self contradicting equality in discontinuous and continuous energy packets - 'quantum', which, literally translated from Latin equals 'what quantity'. It came to pass that, depending on how these units are measured and otherwise evaluated, they alternately manifest as 'waves', and, as 'particles' - continuity, and discontinuity.

From this arose a further quandary of defining the dynamics of what was projected, compared to the method or conditions of projection. Quantum Mechanics (perhaps better understood as 'quantum dynamics') was not altogether contradictory to the - at that time, much established continuous wave theory -

219 - Contents

Page 221: Total Field Theory

which was often confirmed in delicate laboratory observations as well as more pedestrian observations such as the often exemplified fact that a swinging pendulum loses its momentum in a continuous declination of kinetic energy. Quantum Mechanics contests this. Black body radiation occurs in discontinuous packages of microcosmically indivisible energy units of erg seconds, where the individual, indivisible unit is designated as 'h', for the numerically expressed value of:.0000000000000000000000000066, or, 6, 6 x 1027

Establishing that ordinary sizes as perceived by human observers were not the end measure of what was occurring in the much smaller realms of physicality and dynamics. Max Planck had not excluded the previous standards of observation and measurement, whereas, he certainly had established that the characteristics of the larger physical world were not aligned with those of the smaller physical world, and that the Latin statement, ut infra, ut supra and conversely ('as above, so below'), was a generalization but not a law.

220 - Contents

Page 222: Total Field Theory

Atomic (microcosmic) physics was understood to be in its early stages and the Planck dynamics were a portention that many other unexpected discoveries were due, as the science of observing and measuring microcosmic reality progressed - the evolutions of which were alternately championed and challenged, by Planck, Rutherford, Einstein, Bohr, Schrödinger and a lot of others time and space does not allot for - as it was and is - in the format of this dissertation... ------------------------

There are two kinds of math. Metric, and, non-metric. The first is obliged to be responsive to and directly determined by measurably real conditions; with or without mathematical descriptions of them. Non-metric math is, for example, not obliged to conform to any existentially (conditionally, physically, spatially, dynamically, phenomenologically) manifest state or process of observed, measurable reality. An exemplary pair of non-metric mathematical formulas can be equally correct, while reciprocally and mutually disproving each other - numbers only. Who needs reality to do non-metric

221 - Contents

Page 223: Total Field Theory

mathematics? Has little or nothing to do with 'science'.

(Meanwhile, Truly Yours has been banned from several internet 'science forums' for providing the <what was then the free access> URL addresses to this work - they call it 'spamming'...)____________________________________

Einstein's Unified Field. The most evolved understanding of the large and small force dominated, macro and microcosmic universe. A comprehensive unification of large and small forces with their correspondingly relative space-time coordinated values, manifest in electromagnetism and gravity, discovered as having the same causal identity. Manifestly being the same entity. The Rosetta Stone of theoretical physics. (Yet to be rubber-stamped by the Hollywood Guild?)

222 - Contents

Page 224: Total Field Theory

Chapter Eleven QUANTUM MECHANICS RECONSIDERED FROM 4-D ‘PARTICLE’, to 5 & 6-D ‘FIELD’. Part I

A proposed Resolution of the Comparative Disparity between discontinuous Quantum Mechanics and continuous Field Theory, follows, after a brief review of the issued, dissolute problem.

The term ‘Force’ (‘F’), as it relates to and represents gravity, has never been comprehensively defined or understood in physics, until now. This is because ultimately, contrary to popular dogma proclaiming four universal forces: there are only two forces in the Universe - gravity and electromagnetism (including large and small, weak and strong forces) - What Fritjov Capra correctly calls ‘Tao’; neither of which has previously been identified. They are unified herein as results of the 4, 5 and 6 dimensional space-time continuum of gravity, electricity and magnetism - the simultaneous manifestation and extension of six Euclidean dimensions. - K.B.R.

223 - Contents

Page 225: Total Field Theory

THE RESOLUTE CONFLUENCE OF CONTINUITY & DISCONTINUITY Einstein was not awarded the Nobel Prize for his Special and General (continuous field) theories of relativity, but rather for his contributions to photon-discontinuity ('particle') theory, i.e. 'quantum mechanics'. This is the refuge of the Particle 'theory' school of thought, where quantum mechanics is adopted as the foundation of the 'theory' of so called Particle Physics and discontinuity; whereas, relativity is about continuous waves.

The two discussions, Quantum Mechanics/ Photoelectric Effect/Particle Theory, and the subject of relativity and field theory are generally considered antithetical/contrary-to each other - the perceived discontinuous fork in the formerly continuous road through theoretical physics.

In 1900, theoretical physics was near to recognizing and utilizing - pursuing continuous field theory to its fullest extents (*which the record humbly submits, is since accomplished herein); when Max Plank's discovery of the 'constant "h" factor' emerged - a discontinuous, invariably uniform value that

224 - Contents

Page 226: Total Field Theory

the continuous field could be (and is in fact) reduced to. This discovery deterred/ diverted any further pursuit of the direction Maxwell's accumulating camp was proceeding in, with his continuous field theory...

Theoretical physics branched out, at Planck's introduced juncture of discontinuity; wherein and thenceforth, theoretical physics in general was dichotomized, brachiated; divided into two camps...

Field Theory is about continuous waves. Quantum Mechanics is about discontinuous units (of waves, called 'particles'). The record repeats, the two subjects are generally considered mutually exclusive. Continuous Field Physics apparently contradicted by Discontinuous 'Particle' physics... (Quanta - photons - are not so much perceived as discontinuously surface 'particles', as they are perceived as discontinuously unsurfaced waves/fields).

Whereas, the apparently inherent, so called 'contradiction', is a 3-dimensionally misunderstood illusion: projected on a 4-dimensional phenomenon; starring, the usual, 3-Dimensionally spellbinding, culpable party

225 - Contents

Page 227: Total Field Theory

animals? Standardizing a three dimensional concept of a spiral, there is nothing unrealistic about Archimede's spiral (It's just 3-Dimensionally expanding, in an allegedly 'acknowledged' 4-D universe)...

Whereas, the record submits, continuous fields inherently beget Discontinuous Particles: Note (in the foregoing illustrations and narrative) the accelerating transition of the four dimensional mass, consisting of four ninety degree quadrants.

Any more energy generated by that system, has no more room to occur inside that spheroidal electromagnetic charge (of 360o 4-D mass/matter system); the 5th quadrant of ninety degrees - generated by and a result of

226 - Contents

Page 228: Total Field Theory

the four dimensions constituting the material energy that generates it, moves - is emitted - at right angles out of 4-D matter, in a fifth ninety degree unit of electricity, the 5th dimension. 'Quantum Leaping' out of the four ninety degree quadrants of physical matter.

For this reason - of a 5th 90o unit, all quanta/photons have the same 'Quantum' value (plural - 'quanta'), though they may occur - always having the same value - in more extended units of or toward infra red, or more compact units of or toward ultra violet.

The following information is extracted from The Dictionary of SCIENCE, by E.B. Uvarov and D. R. Chapman, Penguin Publishers, copyright 1943 to 1975. "Quantum - According to the quantum theory, energy exists in discrete units, only whole numbers of which can exist: each unit is called a 'quantum' <plural 'quanta'>. The quantum of electromagetic radiation is the photon; in certain contexts, the quantum of energy associated with nuclear forces may be taken as the meson.

Quantum Mechanics: The system of mechanics which, during the present century,

227 - Contents

Page 229: Total Field Theory

has replaced Newtonian Mechanics as a method of measuring physical phenomena occurring on a very small scale (e.g., the motion of electrons and nuclei within atoms; see atom, structure of).

Quantum Theory originated with the discovery by Max Planck that the heat radiation from a black body (see black body radiation) is quantized, i.e., emitted in discrete quanta of energy, the magnitudes of which are given by the products of the frequency of the radiation and a universal constant, now known as Planck's constant. It was soon realized that all electromagnetic radiations are quantized (see photon) and the theory was developed by Niels Bohr, so that the spectrum of hydrogen could be accounted for quantitatively (see Bohr theory). This early version of quantum mechanics was refined by Sommerfield to take into account the elliptical orbits of electrons. More recently quantum mechanics has been developed in a specialized form, known as wave mechanics, which is more versatile and involves fewer arbitrary assumptions than the original theory."

'Photo-electric effect'. In general, any effect arising from the result of a transfer of energy

228 - Contents

Page 230: Total Field Theory

from light incident on a substance to electrons in the substance. The term is normally restricted to one type of the effect, namely the emission of electrons by substances when irradiated with light of a certain frequency greater than a minimum threshold frequency. Electrons emitted in this way are called photo-electrons and constitute a photo-electric current when the system is included in a suitable circuit."

(*Quanta may sometimes be collectively measured and/or otherwise improvisationally considered, in erg seconds <one erg = 10-7 joules> or Angstrom units <One AU=10-10 metre. A measurement of wavelengths of light & intra-molecular distances.> - KBR) - The Dictionary of SCIENCE, by E.B. Uvarov and D.R. Chapman, Penguin Publishers.

And now, this: May the Reader mark the above issued definition of 'Quantum Theory', and especially its closure quote, alluding to the evolved adaptation of 'wave mechanics': "More recently quantum mechanics has been developed in a specialized form, known as wave mechanics, which is more versatile and

229 - Contents

Page 231: Total Field Theory

involves fewer arbitrary assumptions than the original theory."

The above information with its closing note is simply a reminder that the popular perception of quantum mechanics is that it contradicts 'field-wave' considerations, whereas, quantum mechanics has been addressed more manageably, in context of 'wave mechanics'.

An Offered Avenue of Comprehension in theQuantum Mechanical Field of 'Discontinuity' and the 'Quantum Leap' (continued)...

The 5th dimension (5th ninety degree extension out of the four part, three hundred sixty degree quadrants) doesn't ‘mysteriously’ leap out of 4-D matter at all, but rather is an inevitably extrapolated, continuous - and accelerated - extension of it (the 4-D mass from which it originates and by which it - the 5th dimension, is generated), manifest in an apparently discontinuous unit - "Plank's constant 'h' factor"; photon - always having the same value, because it is consistently the 5th ninety degree unit extending out of the 4 physical dimensions that precede and generate it.

230 - Contents

Page 232: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Four 90o quadrants constituting an electromagnetic charge. The illustrated ‘platform’ of the 4th quadrant is perceived as its 3-D boundary. Photoelectric emissions extending beyond it are the 5th & 6th

dimensions of electricity and magnetism.

231 - Contents

Page 233: Total Field Theory

Chapter Twelve QUANTUM MECHANICS RECONSIDERED Part II

The 5th ninety degree unit (photons; 'Planck's "constant 'h' factor") photons, or 'quanta' - is the smallest unit of energy known to academia. The described dynamic does not actually contradict continuous field theory (as popular perceived and alleged), but rather, is a result of and generated by the 4-D space-time continuum.

5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism respectively, are accelerating, just as the source from which they invariably originate (4-D matter), but the expansion of electricity and magnetism is exponentially extended from 4-D matter and therefore accelerating at a much faster - quantum leaping - rate. An illusion of 'contradiction' of continuous field theory, whereas the apparently 'discontinuous' particle is actually a 4-dimensionally and continuously expanding charge of electricity which generates 5 and 6 dimensional, 90o segments - photons - at right angles from it's 4-D boundaries.

232 - Contents

Page 234: Total Field Theory

(The record may be 'redundant' in the presentation of this issue, whereas, the

233 - Contents

Page 235: Total Field Theory

variously repeated descriptions wish to approach the unprecedented solution from several different perspectives. Thank you.) This record describes the above explained dynamics of Planck's 'constant "h" factor' (known as the 'quantum leap'): as the 'translatory moment' - when the 5th 90o unit of electricity extends out of the 4-D quadrant of 90o that generates furthermore, 90o of electricity, followed by 90o of magnetism; i.e. - the 5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively. Comprehensively and continuously emitted in discontinuous units, called 'quanta' and/or 'photons'; often referred to as 'photo-electric effect'. The 'translatory moment' is also when the apparently 'standing field' of (actually expanding) 4-D matter, projects the 5th and 6th dimensions of electromagnetism, abruptly accelerates beyond the acceleration-rate of 4-D matter (an apparent 'standing field', emitting the recognized electromagnetic field; in discrete - 90o units); emitted at light speed (relative to the apparently 'standing <'static'> field' from which it originates and by which it - electromagnetism - is generated).

234 - Contents

Page 236: Total Field Theory

360o divided by 90o equals four, followed by a 5th 90o 'pie chart' shape, extrapolated at right angles out of and far exceeding the - collective - area of the four 90o quadrants preceding it. Repeat: note that the 5th 90o component occurs beyond 360o, and that, by way of extrapolation - exponential acceleration - the 5th component, although identical in 90o shape, very abruptly transforms to a size much larger – and correspondingly more tenuous - than all four combined 90o quadrants preceding it. When the four 'sliced pie quarters' are gathered together in an equilateral circle, they simultaneously complete a 360 degree whole. This represents a so called 'particle', more appropriately described as a 4 dimensional 'charge' of field energy.

The 5th section of 90o occurs outside of and at right angles to the described quadrant of four 90o segments. This record offers the (above diagrammatic) geometric expression - of an extrapolating spiral - as an example of 4-Dimensional acceleration of matter, generating a fifth 90o segment, representing the 5th dimension of electricity, contiguously extending

235 - Contents

Page 237: Total Field Theory

at right angles out of the 360o, 4-Dimensional system from which it originates and by which it is generated; while the *6th 90o segment of 4-D charge-generated magnetism, exponentially extends at right angles out of the 5th.

Chapter Thirteen QUANTUM WAVE & FIELD MECHANICS

Notwithstanding, the herein proffered, geometric translation of the qualities of matter and space-time dynamics - provided by way of the recognition of matter (as an implicit 'standing <'static'> wave' system) and gravity, as the 4th D, generating the explicitly transient 5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism.

The consideration of the exponential inclusion of logarithmic 90o segments, definable as physical dimensions, up to and beyond six, proceeding to infinity (in 90o quadrants), may allow for recognition of previously unidentified dimensions...Wikipedia

236 - Contents

Page 238: Total Field Theory

The Golden Spiral You could, if you wanted to, continue drawing the spiral into infinity. It never ends. Look at the picture and you will understand. The golden spiral also resembles something in nature. A seashell of course! The Golden ratio is everywhere.-----------------------

Wikipedia - Magnetic field, moving at right angles to electric field, and parallel to charge.

The Earth's magnetic field, which is approximately a dipole. However, the "N" and "S" (north and south) poles are labeled here

237 - Contents

Page 239: Total Field Theory

geographically, which is the opposite of the convention for labeling the poles of a magnetic dipole moment.------------------------

Combined electric & magnetic fields manifest as an electromagnetic field.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

....with *magnetism moving at right angles to electricity (moving at right angles out of the 4-D center point mass; fulfilling the definition for a 5th dimension), 'charge'/'particle' - magnetism thereby fulfilling the definition for a *6th dimension...----------------------------

238 - Contents

Page 240: Total Field Theory

Photoelectric effect, i.e., 'quantum mechanics'. Moreover, the 'quantum leap' is a sobriquet from the popular consideration that a given unit of microcosmic energy moves from one (Niels Bohr) 'orbit' (or, alternative 'shell' theorized station) to another, without ever occupying the space - interval - between the transposed orbit. There is no explanation for this perplexing enigma-apparent ('the quantum leap').

This record submits that the transposition of a given orbit, as it is perceived in 4 dimensions instead of three, offers the alternative interpretation of the so called 'leap', as occurring in a spiral shaped path - unanticipated; uncompensated-for, in the status quo 3-dimensional failures to comprehensively accommodate 'quantum leap', as comprehensively expressed in the above two illustrations of 4, 5 & 6 dimensionally equivalent geometric structures. That is, the 4-dimensionally interpreted 'leap' is not per se, any kind of 3-D perceived vertical straight line ( ----> ) - up or down, to and from orbit A to orbit B, constituting the (short cut perceived) 'leap' (from one orbit or shell to

239 - Contents

Page 241: Total Field Theory

another) - at all, but, rather, is a (lateral, long way around) coil shaped ( @ ) - spiral-spin-up (360o) transience...

240 - Contents

Page 242: Total Field Theory

...which may be alternately and approximately perceived within the structure of the 'YinYang' or 'Tao' symbol, from center to outside parameters, from a lower orbit to a higher one, and conversely (*spiral spin-down, this perspective also includes the ambivalent dynamics of 'chemical valence').

Yin Yang ('Tao')

The symbol of apparent opposites with its connotations of antipodal contention is actually an icon of mutually supportive, complementary reciprocity, since about the 3rd century BC; accompanied by a philosophy proffering that its complete gestalt is beyond human comprehension (which it may well be, for all of its elegant - prescient implying - simplicity.)

(Refer Fritjov Capra's TAO OF PHYSICS, allows for *the illusion of apparent contradiction: actually mutually supportive; that being the central meaning of 'Tao'. In this case, the 'inexplicable enigma' of quantum mechanics and its perceived 'contradiction' of continuous field theory.)

241 - Contents

Page 243: Total Field Theory

In the Bohr modeled atom of planet-like, nucleus-sun orbiting electrons, the orbits are not circular or elliptical, but rather - as with any other orbiting entity's 4-D path: spiral shaped.

The 4-D space-time continuum is presently said to be 'acknowledged' in academic and experimental physics; yet, the effects of that continuum, continue to go unrecognized, denied, discarded and unaccounted for. The round - O and elliptical - 0 - 3-D structure - wherever it orbitally occurs - is not anticipated or perceived as spiral shaped - @ , as it is in fact, in the prevailing, four dimensional setting. There is no precedent for this offered (4-D spiral 'translatory moment') explanation, regarding the cited 'incomprehensibility' of Quantum Mechanical Dynamics; including a solution applicable to the 'quantum leap'.

Subsequent to this conceptual departure in what had formerly been the generally agreed dominant paradigm of field physics, Eddington quipped, "We'll call matter 'particles' on Mondays, we'll call it 'waves' on Tuesdays, and we'll call it 'waveicles' the rest of the week." - Paraphrased.

242 - Contents

Page 244: Total Field Theory

Eddington's slap-stick ambivalence about the apparent dilemma, directly implies the ambiguous enigma as illusory.

This record submits that continuous field physics does not contradict discontinuous 'particle' physics, or conversely. They symbiotically (and, until further notice, invariably) accompany one another, the latter being generated by the former. As gravity is generally a push (at short distances - GR) and a pull-push (at long distances - SR), so particles and fields are likewise non-contradictory and mutually reciprocal, co-existing together.

Until further notice, electricity and magnetism invariably accompany one another and are apparently two different vectors expressing the same obvious transience at right angles out of a 'particle' - electromagnetic charge, misunderstood as being a non-expanding, 3-D 'standing' ('static') field.

243 - Contents

Page 245: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

Chapter Fourteen AUXILIARY INFORMATION Epilogue Part I

When all else fails: read the instructions. Good morning class. Today were going to wake up to sleep-inducing lectures on theoretical physics; from now on, from dawning spin-in to dusking spin-out. Opposition here may optionally augur-in and/or crash and burn spectacularly at the front of the class. Once you're in, you're augured in for the revolving binary duration. Condemned to keep adding up to the 3 Body Problem: where 2 wrongs don't make a right. But, 3 or more do. (Carrying phi out to its consummately last decimal point?)

244 - Contents

Page 246: Total Field Theory

Please restrain any residual *applause?

(*All background noise, including hissing, booing and flatulence, will only be opportunistically interpreted as further proof of the Big Bang theory, and Big Brother's <'Gotta revolution!'> 'solution.' Refer the 13 billion year microwave background radiation hangover from the Big Bangologist's confetti and party throwing 'Beginning'. <Never mind the Steady State Theory's superior explanation for anything and everything that the Big Bang Gang is unconscionably plundering from Lambda /\ to 'explain'>...) __________________

Some of you may be familiar with the book title: ZEN AND THE ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE, by Robert Pirsig. There are two statements in that book which are appropriately applicable to the self inflicted demise of Contemporary Physics (representatives) and the prevailing gravitational and 4-Dimensional dilemma. On page 100, Pirsig writes: 'The real purpose of scientific method is to make sure Nature hasn't misled you into

245 - Contents

Page 247: Total Field Theory

thinking that you know something you don't actually know'. Again, on page 5, Pirsig writes, 'The truth knocks on the door and you say, 'go away, I'm looking for the truth', so it goes away'. Pirsig's precautionary allows that you must also make sure Nature hasn't misled you in to thinking that you don't know something that you do actually know.

The attempt to isolate and discover gravity waves is comparable to standing or sitting in Einstein's General Relativity-demonstrating elevators and 'attempting to isolate and/or discover gravity waves'.

This misunderstanding is directly contingent to the refusal to recognize the 4th Dimension:

246 - Contents

Page 248: Total Field Theory

as universal gravity on or near four dimensional matter; extended across space from four dimensional matter (acting at a distance), via the 5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively. In attempting to isolate - and find an insulation from - gravity, we have succeeded in isolating - and finding an insulation from - the 4th Dimension. Isolating it from reality - and ourselves from an unprecedented understanding of the Gravitational ('How can I relate to it in my own?') Experience.

We keep asking the wrong questions. I have been repeatedly asked by sincere people - "What can we do with the statement 'GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION'?" Having a mind of its own, this operator must censor what Molly Keyboard MacColley has to say in response to those who ask 'What can we do with the 4th Dimension?'.

May it suffice to say for the moment, the question might be asked of Lief Erikson for a run-down on North American Civilization, or the Wright Bros. for a quick briefing on Air Force One - or a Boeing 747 crossed with a bumblebee or humming bird. One must know that the unrecognized continent - or

247 - Contents

Page 249: Total Field Theory

aerodynamic principle - is there; must recognize it, before anything can be ‘done’ with it.

THE DOMINANT ACADEMIC PARADIGMReminiscently comparable to the drunk who was crawling around the base of a street lamp one moonless night. A policeman happened by and watched him for a few minutes; finally asked him what he was doing. The drunk replied, 'I'm looking for my wine bottle, I lost a full bottle of wine'. The policeman queried, 'Are you quite sure you lost it around here - I don't see a sign of any wine bottle'. The drunk replied, 'Oh no officer, I didn't lose it here - I know that for sure. I heard it fall out of my pocket about forty or fifty feet from here'. The policeman exclaimed, 'Well then man, you'll never find it here!' The drunk looked up and said 'Yes, I know officer, but there's no street lamp over there'." (At least, there didn't use to be.) - Kent B. Robertson, @ San Francisco City College GREENPEACE Gravity Premiere Benefit, October, '76

* * * * * * * * * * *

248 - Contents

Page 250: Total Field Theory

THE (amazing) LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE (continued): "There exists a profound similarity between Newton's Law 0f Universal Gravity, Coulomb's Law Of the Interaction Of Electric Charges, and Sir Humphrey Gilbert's Law for the interaction of magnetic poles. And, if one can shield electric and magnetic forces, why can it not also be done with gravitational forces?" - George Gamow GRAVITY pp. 143-4 --------

"Einstein again broadened his theory to include the phenomena of electricity and magnetism. This does not mean that he has given an electromagnetic explanation of gravitation. Many attempts of this kind have been made, and all have failed in the same respect to recognize that there is no screen for (insulation from) gravitation. What Einstein has done is something deeper and broader than that. He has succeeded in finding a formula which may assume two special forms according as a constant which it contains is, or is not, zero. (May expand, or contract <be 4-D: growing ever larger at right angles to itself, or, growing ever smaller at right angles to itself> at the slightest provocation.)...

249 - Contents

Page 251: Total Field Theory

"In the latter case the formula gives us Maxwell's equations for an electromagnetic (repelling) field; in the former, Einstein's equations for a (an impelling) gravitational field." - SPACE, TIME & EINSTEIN, Paul R. Heyl

Today's representative physicists are on Einstein's Relativistic elevator, attempting to "screen", insulate from or "isolate" gravity waves.

It sounds like a joke of some kind... The Book-Cooking Journalistic Questions: "If gravity is caused by the acceleration of the earth's surface, why does a ball roll downhill?" - * THE LA. FREE PRESS, 2/'71 (*A HALF VAST LOOK AT GRAVITY < IS THE 4TH DIMENSION>

250 - Contents

Page 252: Total Field Theory

- *A 'Book Review', under the smug pseudonym of 'Art Wand.')

Had the record been confronted 40 years ago, with such a formidable enigma, he would have abandoned Einstein's abandoned Unified Field in the same masterfully perplexing stroke? Mr. Wand's proposed interrogative (‘…why does a ball roll downhill?’) does establish he’s functionally illiterate or didn't read the book he 'reviewed'... A lot of that rolling around; with a growing number of ersatz, 'Final Theory of Everything’ - authors. (Some of whom have literally torched less condensed hard copies of this book in a trashcan, en conversant with Truly Yours... <P.S. I laughed out loud and reminded the book burner that it's intractable to expel the universe from itself.> The internet is peppered with anonymously originated, cast aspersions against – and censorship of - this author… Refer: http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-theory-articles/2517-einstein-s-so-called-biggest-blunder-right-after-all.html )

"Maxwell's (*expanding) field equations break down, at the (*alleged non-expanding) surface of the particle." – Ibid

251 - Contents

Page 253: Total Field Theory

*Maxwell's equations do not 'break down' at any 'surface' (There is no 'surface'), whereas, the recognized transient light energy 'shifts gears' (exhibits a 'translatory moment') as it moves out of, not as it moves in to a given source from which it originates and by which it is generated - converting upon extending from an apparently 'standing'/'static charge' of very dense 4-D mass energy, to dramatically accelerated, very tenuous 5 & 6-D energy - described by Maxwell's equations - moving at light speed. This transition ('shifting of gears'), is the ephemeral interim between the microcosmically very small, dense, surfaceless, apparently 'static' 'charge' (so called 'particle/'mass energy'), and its extension - quantum leap to - macrocosmic, very large, tenuous, ostensibly transitory electromagnetic field energy.

A 'vector' = direction and magnitude. In this case, the direction - from the center of the 'material charge' from which standing field and transitory energy co-variantly expands, remains omni-directional, while the rate at which the magnitude of a given expanding system, increases, at the transpositionally apparent 'surface', distinguishing the standing

252 - Contents

Page 254: Total Field Theory

(4-D) field inside the originating system, from the measurably transitory (6-D) field outside of the ('particle'/'charge') system.

Reprise: "If the universe was made up of (unstable) disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely." - Ibid.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

"Humanity is not 4 dimensional."

253 - Contents

Page 255: Total Field Theory

- LIFE Science Library's Universe, p. 179 (*The LIFE Science Library's editors and keepers have pronounced the <'acknowledged'> universal 4-D neutrons, protons and electrons as being 3-Dimensional: when they occur in the form of human beings. - KBR

Few in authority on other issues, are found with any, regarding the 4th dimension. A time of the signs. ..................................(‘When you’re lost in the rain in Juarez And it’s Easter time too And your gravity fails And negativity don’t pull you through Don’t put on any airs When you’re down on Rue Morgue Avenue They got some hungry women there And they really make a mess outta you.’ - Bob Dylan, Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues.) _________________________

"The only new thing in this old world, is the history you didn't know about." - Harry Truman

"If it's original, it'll be copied." - H. L. Mencken

254 - Contents

Page 256: Total Field Theory

"An error doesn't have to become a mistake, unless you refuse to correct it." - J..F.K.

('Lee Harvery Oswald acted alone'. - The Warren Report.)

>>>>>>>>>> ......... <<<<<<<<

NON MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS TO FORMERLY INVETERATE, RECIDIVIST PROBLEMS IN PHYSICS. (Continued)- Kent Benjamin RobertsonCopyright © 2002, 1999, ‘85, ‘70.

255 - Contents

Page 257: Total Field Theory

Chapter Fifteen Epilogue Part II

Absolute Zero. Zero degrees Kelvin, remains as controversial as it is elusive. Whereas, the Big Bang 'Theory' is comparable to a soda bottle rocket launched from a tilted box of proactive popcorn in an ad hoc museum of unnatural history.

The second law of thermodynamics has been politically corrected to 'prove' the alleged – post incidental big bang - 'entropic heat death' of the universe. No such occurrence unfolds in a 4-D space time continuum; steady state prevails. Theoretical physics, since the turn of the last century, has become a political carnival.

If this can occur in the purest field of physical science, it can occur in any academic discipline, or social morality or law. Enter mind control, doublethink, newspeak and double-government, as Orwellian dominated, normalized policy.

This author has been invectively described as having ‘satanistically turned gravity upside down’; whereas, under the authority of Newton

256 - Contents

Page 258: Total Field Theory

and Einstein, this author has documented gravity right side up. ...................

Infinite Smallness - in 4 dimensions - is just as endless as infinite largeness, continued: *‘Zeno’s paradox.’ (*’If you keep cutting the distance in half, between point A and point B, you never get from point A to point B’.) Not really a paradox at all. Zeno may have been entirely aware of its flaw and introduced it as a riddle, the timely solution to which he may have been aware. In any event: In reality, a person or thing can move from point A to point B. Whereas, in a purely geometric, 3-D consideration, the advance of point A, enroute point B (halving the distance between the two points), never arrives at it’s destination, because the geometric 3-D consideration - conspicuously - leaves out the 4th coordinate of time (Sound familiar?).

O degrees Kelvin - Absolute Zero - is (so far) unachieved in the laboratory. Word is, that laboratory experiments in cryogenics have come ‘very close’ to Absolute Zero (the cessation of all motion - molecular and atomic - in a given material system).

257 - Contents

Page 259: Total Field Theory

On the other hand, ‘very close’ to Absolute Zero, is indeed a relative term. A tenth, thousandth, hundred thousandth, or billionth of a degree (Kelvin or Fahrenheit) sounds impressively ‘very close’ to achievement of Absolute Zero: until the consideration of the relativity of infinite smallness in 4-Dimensional space-time is taken seriously into the allegory and deceptively apparent ‘very close’ approaches to Absolute Zero. (Speculative note: If and when any physical object is successfully subjected to Absolute Zero, that object may appear to implode and disappear; due to the cessation of all molecular and atomic motions, causing it to be the only 3 dimensional entity, surrounded by a 4 dimensionally expanding universe, creating the illusion that it swiftly shrinks, when it is actually the only thing that isn’t expanding. Black hole singularities for example, may be three dimensional entities in a four dimensional universe - becoming as infinitely small and dense in three dimensions, as the 4-D universe becomes relatively larger and more tenuous around it.)

Yesterday’s 4-dimensionally considered mile is much smaller, when compared with today’s

258 - Contents

Page 260: Total Field Theory

4-dimensionally considered mile. The day before yesterday’s mile is even smaller than yesterday’s or today’s mile. Yet, in context of the moment of time the measurement is made, in these A, B, C marked, ever enlarging-moment considered coordinate systems, they are all the same value, relative to the 4-D frame of time and space they are measured in. In the 4-D space-time continuum, yesterday’s 60 miles per hour, is not today’s. Today’s mile is larger, and today’s miles per hour is faster, when compared with yesterday’s. The same is true of the speed of sound or light. These remain constant, yet are always increasing with the size of the coordinates system they are measured in. The value of time varies, with the comparative and ever changing - physically expanding - value of the coordinate system it is measured in. Time is motion. Motion occurs in - requires - space.

This applies to all standards of space and time measurement. This same consideration is applicable to coming ‘very close’ to Absolute Zero. The reason Absolute Zero probably never will be achieved.

259 - Contents

Page 261: Total Field Theory

Yesterday’s 72 degrees Fahrenheit, is not today’s; today’s is not tomorrow's. All three temperature measurements, occurring in moment’s A, B and C, are the same, relative to the coordinate system they are measured in, and different, only when compared to themselves: in different moments of space-time.

The values of time, space (including measured heat, which is motion in space; motion is exactly synonymous with time, and conversely) are constantly changing - yet remain relatively constant - in the 4-D space-time continuum. Just as the velocity of light is constant, yet always increasing, along with the acceleration of the mass field (4-D matter) from which light invariably originates and by which it (light, electromagnetism) is generated...

The 4-D space-time continuum of the past, is ‘very small and dense’, when compared to the present. The present dimensional size of space and material objects at large in the present, is comparatively very small and dense, when compared with the future-projected physical dimensions of the universe or any four dimensionally expanding portion of it...

260 - Contents

Page 262: Total Field Theory

For the same reason that *'Zeno’s (alleged) paradox' suffers from leaving out the 4th coordinate of time. As does the ‘big bang theory’ - preempting the steady state theory on the premise that matter is 3-dimensionally static and that the universe is dissipating. (*'If you keep cutting the distance between A and B, in half, you never get from A to B.' This is true in space without time. But there is no space without time, and there is no time, without space. Refer 'space-time'. Time is motion, and motion requires space to move in. Zeno's Paradox excludes the factor of time. Therefore it is not a paradox at all. It's a misunderstanding... Caused by the exclusion of the element of time, and the 4-D space-time continuum.

The same misunderstanding is preventing the realization that the alleged ‘microcosmic (very small) nuclear binding forces’, are simply and inevitably a miniaturized manifestation of macrocosmic (very large) gravitational forces. Gravity is said to occur for the most part, only in the realm of the very large. Whereas, nuclear binding forces are simply 'very small' (very dense; electromagnetic) gravitational forces. How wrong a 3-dimensionally fixated

261 - Contents

Page 263: Total Field Theory

scientist (who says he 'acknowledges' Einstein’s 4-D space-time continuum) can be, and for what schizoid, transparently unscientific reasons.

"The whole evolution of our ideas about the processes of nature, with which we have been concerned so far, might be regarded as an organic development of Newton’s ideas. But while the process of perfecting the field theory was still in full swing, the facts of heat, radiation, the spectra, radioactivity, etc., revealed a limit to the serviceableness of the whole intellectual system which today still seems to us absolutely insuperable, in spite of immense success at certain points. Many physicists maintain - and there are weighty arguments in their favor - that in the face of these facts not merely the differential law but the law of causation itself - hitherto the fundamental postulate of all natural science, has collapsed. Even the possibility of a spatial-temporal construction, which can be unambiguously coordinated with physical events, is denied." - Albert Einstein, ESSAYS IN SCIENCE, 1934

______________

262 - Contents

Page 264: Total Field Theory

Chapter Sixteen AFTERWARD Part I

***************

Transcendental number - the square root of minus one - pi. Pi. 3.1416 followed by an infinite number of zeros. Refer: the interminable chore of carrying pi out to its last decimal point... And the transcendental growth of the number eleven when multiplied: 1x 11=11. 2x11=22. 3x11=33. 4x11=44; etceteras.

Buddhists have adopted it as an expression of expansion. ..............

The abstract definitive of and about physical reality is based on numbers. If you wish to learn the circumference of a circle, you use pi.

If you want to know the area within a circular circumference, you use pi r squared. There appears to be a four dimensional trout swimming in this acknowledged eloquent encryption. Cruising dorsal fins at the surface of our Tequila Sunrise?: the circle pi r squared is applied to, is evidently four dimensionally expanding; the reason it takes forever (and an

263 - Contents

Page 265: Total Field Theory

appendage of endless tomorrows?) to carry pi out to its last decimal point.

The Golden Rectangle and the exponential extrapolation of four 90o quadrants completing a 360 degree whole is invoked, if not alternately identified, here. It is said that Euclid was the first to find - in about the year 300 BC - what, by many other since adopted descriptions, was originally described as the golden rectangle. Its direct relationship to the already issued subject of exponential extrapolation in this book is said to have deeply disturbed no small number of post Pythagorean Geometricians and Mathematicians, due, to the 'incommensurate' value. That is, most numerical and mathematical considerations lead to a conclusive outcome; a result, an ending closure; a logical consequence of a reasoning process...

An enigmatically intriguing fact of pi r squared is, that that there is no resolution in the formula. It's renowned for taking whomever toils to carry it out to its last decimal point is subjectively synonymous with futile dissolution, and, among other more

264 - Contents

Page 266: Total Field Theory

objective if mysterious considerations, infinity itself. _________

INDUCTION, DEDUCTION, PRODUCTION, continued reprise:

The Pythagorean philosophers place great stress on the first four positive numbers. In the numbers one through four, you have 1 as a point. 2 as a line. 3 as a plane.

In consideration of a triangle in three dimensions - a pyramid: 4 sides then rest upon a 5th coordinate (number), the base of the four sided pyramid; wherein the colloquially recognized pyramid forms a tetrahedron. A square, plus B square equals C square.

A treatise on Nature, authored by Aristotle, entitled: ‘physics’; soon to be known as *metaphysics (*Nature beyond the knowledge of people), now specifically defined as ‘physics.’ Newton was not called a physicist, for example, he was called a philosopher, his PRINCIPIA is a philosophical dissertation. Academic physics would emerge from the more general roots of philosophy - a mode of inquiry. Refer the atomistic theory of Democritus. Atoms (matter reduced to its

265 - Contents

Page 267: Total Field Theory

smallest form, while remaining an element, rather than a - sub-atomic - electron, neutron and/or proton constituting an elemental atom) and the void (space - the interval between two or more points). Ontology, is the study of that which exists - reality at large. Often depending on the limitations of observation. Ontology is more than what is immediately apparent to the human senses. Epistemology, is the subdivision of ontology, in the sense of how he search for reality is conducted – the method of ontological study.

_________________

266 - Contents

Page 268: Total Field Theory

A Review Series of Timelessly Cogent quotes, follows:

"...Descarte was not so far from the truth when he believed he must exclude the existence of an empty space. The notion indeed appears absurd as long as physical reality is seen exclusively in ponderable bodies. It requires the idea of the field as the representative of reality, in combination with the General Principle of Relativity, to show the true kernel of Descarte's idea, 'there exists no space empty of field'." - Einstein, p.p.375 - 6, IDEAS & OPINIONS

"Regarding the tenability of gravitation as an impelling force, paralleled by the Cosmological Constant as a repelling force, a natural and complementary occurrence of this apparently incongruous ambiguity exists and prevails in the fact that omni-directional electric field lines around a positive charge are directed away from the center of the charge; whereas, the field lines around a negative charge move inward, toward the center of the charge." - K.B. Robertson, p. 221, GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION, Copyright 1979.

267 - Contents

Page 269: Total Field Theory

"I do find gravity an attractive force at times." - K.B.Robertson. Ibid.

"Matter and space are seen to be inseparable and interdependent parts of a single whole." - Fritjov Capra, THE TAO OF PHYSICS, p. 208

"According to the physicist-philosopher Ernst Mach... material objects not only determine the structure of the surrounding space, but are in turn influenced by their environment in an essential way."- Fritjov Capra, Ibid, p. 209

"In one of the most reckless and sweeping generalizations in the history of thought, Newton filled the entire space of the Universe with interacting forces of attraction, issuing from all particles of matter and acting upon all particles of matter across the boundless abysses of darkness." - Arthur Koestler, THE SLEEPWALKERS

"... when a light ray is spreading from a point, the energy is not distributed continuously over ever increasing spaces, but consists of a finite number of energy quanta, that are localized in points in space, move

268 - Contents

Page 270: Total Field Theory

without dividing and can be absorbed or generated as a whole". - Albert Einstein

"The above and below quoted statements have been called the most revolutionary sentences ever written by physicists in the 20th Century. It signals the end of perceived continuity and endorses the beginning of duality. The wave is no longer exclusively continuous. The particle is no longer exclusively discontinuous. The two seem to join and share each other’s qualities together as one." - Wikipedia

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

"The views of space and time which I wish to lay before you have sprung from the soil of experimental physics and therein lays their strength. They are radical. Henceforth, space by itself and time by itself, are doomed to fade

269 - Contents

Page 271: Total Field Theory

away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality." - Hermann Minkowski, 80th Assembly of German Natural Scientists & Physicists, 1908.

End of condensed (internet) presentation of Total Field Theory: The Non-mathematical Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Cosmological Constant and Unified Field.

Thank you for reading this missive.(Afterward Notes to follow)

(Special thanks to Robert & all moderators, administrators and staff of the science forum <T.O.E.>: Theory of Everything)- K. B. Robertson 4/21/07 1741 hrs EDT

"There once was a lady named Bright, who traveled much faster than light. She departed one day, in a relative way, and returned on the previous night". - Eric Buller 1923

270 - Contents

Page 272: Total Field Theory

Chapter SeventeenAFTERWARD Part II

TOTAL FIELD THEORY - No Space Empty Of Field.

The Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field (Steady State)

Theory.by K. B. Robertson

******

As this anthological narrative attests. there is nothing new about Newton's gravity or Einstein's 4th dimension of space-time, except, empirical proof that they are one and the same. Their causal identity is the physically accelerating expansion of the universe at large.In this work at hand, Einstein's formerly abandoned Unified Field is reinstated (with the Steady State Theory); without mathematics. New information keeps coming in that finds the 'Big Bang' universe not only to be expanding, but to be picking up speed. A 'Big Bang' originated universe isn't supposed to be doing that. Whereas, that's exactly what a physically accelerating 'Steady State' universe does.This work is all about the reasons why. Like the Unified Field theory, the 'Steady State'

271 - Contents

Page 273: Total Field Theory

theory is abandoned. The reasons for their reinstatement are accumulating...

____________________

Newton asserted ‘Hypothesis non fingo’. - ‘I make no hypothesis’. Yet, his entire,

unarguably revolutionary Classical Mechanics was based on the hypothetical 'particle' that science has yet to assuredly accommodate.

The ‘particle concept’ that dominates physics and the vast majority of colloquial human thought: has never been proven beyond

hypothetical, quasi-scientific retainers. ‘The (rarely) indicted ‘particle’ isn’t found ‘wrong’ here, but rather: resiliently incomplete; so as to aggressively exclude the incumbent role of

the continuous field in the corporeal balance of material considerations. - K. B. Robertson

"In the laboratory of Michael Faraday (1791 - 1867), who made many important

contributions to the knowledge of electricity and magnetism, there is an interesting entry in

1849. It reads: 'Gravity. Surely this force must be capable of

an experimental relation to electricity, magnetism, and other forces, so as to build it

up with them in reciprocal action and equivalent effect. Consider for a moment how

272 - Contents

Page 274: Total Field Theory

to go about touching this matter by facts and trial.'

"But the numerous experiments this famous British physicist undertook to discover such a relation were fruitless, and he concluded this section of his diary with these words: 'Here

end my trials for the present. The results are negative. They do not shake my strong feeling of the existence of a relation between gravity and electricity, though they give no proof that

such a relation exists.' " - George Gamow, GRAVITY

"It is very odd that the theory of gravity, originated by Newton and completed by Einstein, should stand now in majestic

isolation, a Taj Mahal of Science, having little of anything to do with the rapid developments in other branches of physics. Einstein's concept of the gravitational field grew from his Special Theory of Relativity, and the Special Theory

was based on the Theory of the Electromagnetic Field formulated in the last century by the British physicist, James Clerk

Maxwell (1831-79). But in spite of many attempts, Einstein and those who have

followed him have failed any (gravitational) contact with Maxwell's electrodynamics...

273 - Contents

Page 275: Total Field Theory

"Einstein's theory of gravitation was more or less contemporary with quantum theory, but in the forty-five years since they appeared, the two theories have had quite different rates of development. Proposed by Max Planck and carried forward by the work of Niels Bohr,

Louis de Broglie, Erwin Schrodinger, Werner Heisenberg, and others, quantum theory has made colossal progress and evolved into a

broad discipline that explains in detail the inner structures of atoms and their nuclei."

- Gamow, GRAVITY

"On the other hand, Einstein's theory of gravity remains to this day essentially as it was when

he formulated it half a century ago. While hundreds, even thousands, of scientists study the various branches of quantum theory and apply it in many, many fields of experimental research, only a few persist in devoting their

time and passion to further development in the study of gravitation."

- George Gamow, GRAVITY, p. 136.

"Magnetism, gravity, and action at-a-distance have not lost an iota of their baffling mystery since Gilbert (before Newton, 1642 - 1726)"

- Arthur Koestler, THE SLEEPWALKERS.

274 - Contents

Page 276: Total Field Theory

"Since the General Theory of Relativity implies the manifestation of physical reality as a

continuous field, the concept of discontinuous particle cannot play a fundamental part, the

‘particle’ can only appear as a limited region of space in which the field strength and/or density of energy is particularly high." - Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 348

"The combination of the concept of continuous field with that of mass-points discontinuous

from space appears inconsistent. A consistent (total) field theory requires continuity of all elements of the theory, not only in time but

also in space, and in all points in space. Hence the material particle has no place as a fundamental concept in a field theory." - Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 345

"It is very probable that there is a hidden relation between gravity on the one hand and the electromagnetic field and material particles on the other, but nobody is prepared today to say what kind of relation it is. And there is no

way of foretelling how soon any further important progress will be made in this

275 - Contents

Page 277: Total Field Theory

direction." - Excerpted from the Preface to GRAVITY, by George Gamow.

"According to General Relativity, the concept of space detached from any physical content does not exist. The physical reality of space is represented by a field." - Einstein, IDEAS & OPINIONS, p. 348

___________________

The ('red shift') ‘expanding universe’ took the ‘scientific community’ by surprise in 1927 -

1929.. An - ad hoc - explanation was hurriedly put together by Lemaitre, Hubble, Gamow, and

others - if the expansion of space in the universe was back tracked, it was reasoned, it

would eventually converge at a point of intersection (since estimated to have been some 13 billion years ago), where all the matter in the universe must have been

compacted, causing intense pressures and heat which resulted in and caused the ‘big bang’

explosion, resulting in the spatially expanding universe, as it is spectroscopically (‘red shift’)

observed today.

There are more recent variations on this theme, but the described dynamics are the

276 - Contents

Page 278: Total Field Theory

origin of the ‘Big Bang’ perspective. When previously unknown phenomena emerges out of astronomy or experimental physics that is contrary to big bang theory, its proponents reply that there is no other cosmology on the slate beside the big bang; then go about the business of plundering required explanatory ingredients from the very sources they eschew.The cosmological constant, lambda /\ , is not

functionally abandoned, nor is the steady state theory or Einstein's Unified Field (finding

gravity and electromagnetism as two apparently unrelated phenomena which

actually have the same causal identity). These reparative elements have simply been

transferred from their pastures of retirement and reemployed where needed by, of and for

the big bang gang.No big shakes.

('The big bang theory is all we've got.' The big bang is now artfully laced with elements of the

cosmological constant and the steady state theories, the unremarkable presence of which

is spearheaded by operative conditioning, double talk, neurolinguistic programming and

psychomolecular restructuring <refer 'brainwashing'>...)

277 - Contents

Page 279: Total Field Theory

Chapter Eighteen AFTERWARD Part III

Problem: There is no common - big bang - center from which the observed expanding

universe expands. The expansion is astrophysically established as dynamically

expanding in direct line of sight, away from a given observer, from any location. This is not the signature of an explosion from a common

center. It is the signature of a repelling force acting

across space out of all material bodies, paralleling all the characteristics of

conventional gravity, while acting in the opposite direction. Namely, what Einstein called ‘the cosmological constant’ - a force

unlike any other known, because it increases - instead of decreases - with distance.Einstein’s Unified Field theory of 1919

predicted an expanding universe - a prediction that Wilem de Sitter foresaw (in Einstein’s

equations) as early as 1917. A decade before the expanding universe was spectroscopically discovered between 1912 and 1922, by, Dr. Vesto M. Silpher, and translated in 1927 by Friedmann & Lemaitre, and 1929 by Edwin

278 - Contents

Page 280: Total Field Theory

Hubble as proof of a spatially expanding universe, observing (by way of spectroscopic

‘red shift’); that the speed of a receding galaxy increases with distance (‘Hubble’s "red shift").

Einstein - under much influence by Wilem de Sitter – had (inadvertently) predicted an

expanding universe, and that it is the result of a repelling force acting out of all material bodies, just like gravity, except, in the opposite direction. This is the force that

Einstein proposed prevented the universe (full of mutually impelling bodies) from collapsing - a problem that Newton himself called attention

to, for which there was no previous explanation.

When the spatially expanding universe was discovered, it was resolved that this explained why the universe didn’t collapse on itself, and

for this reason, under much ensuing controversy, Einstein was persuaded to

abandon his previously submitted Cosmological Constant repelling force.

Recent data is accumulating, finding that the spatial universe is not only expanding, but that

it is also picking up - increasing in - rate of speed of expansion. Again, this is not the

279 - Contents

Page 281: Total Field Theory

signature of a big bang originated universe, whereas, it is the signature of the abandoned

Cosmological Constant: a force which increases with distance...

It is well known that Einstein abandoned his Cosmological Constant repelling force

(designated with the Greek sign ‘Lambda’ - an inverted V, like this /\ - calling it his ‘biggest

blunder’ ), due to the discovery of the spatially expanding universe. It is not so well known that Einstein went back to working on his

formerly abandoned unified field - cosmological constant - theory, at Princeton, before he died

in 1955...

Besides the ‘red shift’ established expanding universe, there is one other evidentiary phenomenon in particular, which is said to support (if not ‘prove’) the big bang ‘theory’, and that is the issue of cosmic microwave background radiation predicted in 1949 by George Gamow and (inadvertently) confirmed (via satellite) in 1963, by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. Whereas, what is proven by the observed background radiation is that the universe as we know it was more dense and hotter in earlier moments that in the present.

280 - Contents

Page 282: Total Field Theory

The 'Big Bang' interpretation does not have a monopoly on this translation. Any model of an expanding universe yields the same observation (That the universe was more dense and hotter in the past than in the present. This work - the reinstatement of Einstein's presently abandoned Unified <Steady State> Field theory - represents such an alternative explanation).

When Science is Popularly Displaced by Falsity ---------------------------------------------------

The much applauded and controversial 'Big Bang Theory' is not a theory. It is an hypothesis.The much applauded and controversial 'Super String Theory' is not a theory. It is an hypothesis. (Please refer, Webster's dictionary, or, any dictionary of scientific terms.)

These importantly expansive misunderstandings negatively influence and handicap the entire world of contemplation at the foundations of objective thinking. These endlessly repeated misnomers sustain themselves. Calling hypotheses 'theories' is unscientific and misleading, digressive and harmful. Is there no room for a cordial fireside chat about such - very important,

281 - Contents

Page 283: Total Field Theory

fundamental, symptomatic - 'misunderstandings' (Resting comfortably in the center of 'Standard Theory'; expanding tolerance thresholds on the foundations of academia)? Are they not plaintively germane to the influence of scientists on public acceptance, controversy and tolerance thresholds - perspective, science, art, fiction and culture? ___________________

"Big Bang', 'SuperStrings' & the 'out dated' Cosmological Constant.

The ‘ugly head’ of The 'outdated' Truth: “The cosmological constant has now a secure position... Not only does it unify the gravitational and electromagnetic fields, but it renders the theory of gravitation and its relation to space-time measurement so much more illuminating and indeed self evident, that return to the earlier view is unthinkable. I would as soon think of reverting to Newtonian Theory as of dropping the cosmological constant.” - Sir Arthur Eddington, THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE, p. 24

282 - Contents

Page 284: Total Field Theory

“I can see no reason to doubt that the observed recession of the spiral nebulae is due to cosmic repulsion, and it is the effect predicted (in 1919) by Relativity Theory which we were hoping to find. Many other explanations have been proposed - some of them rather fantastic (* ‘tired light’, ‘the big bang’, ‘dark matter’, ‘super strings’) - and there has been a great deal of discussion which seems to me rather pointless. In this, as in other developments of scientific exploration, we must recognize the limitations of our present knowledge and be prepared to consider revolutionary changes.” - Sir Arthur Eddington, pp. 89 - 90, A TREASURY OF SCIENCE (Harlow Shapley publishers)

______________________________________

283 - Contents

Page 285: Total Field Theory

From Jacobowski, to Rascal Puff 4/8/07

It seems you are putting words into Eddington's mouth without alerting us:

Eddington died in 1944, so he could not possibly have made a statement about superstrings. _______________________

Dear Jacobowski:The words you say I seem to be putting into Eddington's mouth without alerting you, are in parentheses and also marked with an asterisk (*). Eddington speaks of 'some rather fantastic' explanations, but does not present any examples of his time, so I - ostensibly and markedly - presented some examples of our time. I believe this simple and obvious qualification is clear to any unbiased reader.___________________________

There are other potent disagreements with the so called Big Bang theory:

"Astronomers have now generally accepted the fact of this expansion, and Einstein's 'field equations' of his General Theory of Relativity can be construed to fit an expanding universe."

284 - Contents

Page 286: Total Field Theory

- Isaac Asimov, THE INTELLIGENT PERSON'S GUIDE TO SCIENCE, p. 49

"NEW CLUES ABOUT THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER: Einstein May Have Been Right After All:

... Energy: Einstein May Have Been Right After All View this image. The good news from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope is that Einstein was right — maybe. ...hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/12/text/ - 17k - Cached - Similar pages - Note thisHubbleSite - NewsCenter - New Clues About the Nature of Dark ...

285 - Contents

Page 287: Total Field Theory

Chapter Nineteen Afterward Part IV

From Buck Dharwin to *RascalPuff4/9/07 "Problem: The expansion is astrophysically established as dynamically expanding in direct line of sight, away from a given observer, from any location. This is not the signature of an explosion from a common center."

That's not a problem for the Big Bang theory. It doesn't claim that there was anything like a conventional "explosion" (*It used to). Neither does it require there to have been a common center (*It used to). In BB cosmology, all points in space suffice equally for the center (That's one of the renovations that have been applied to the Big Bang since its inception - absorbing the dynamics of the <abandoned> cosmological constant).It's also inaccurate to claim that it's not a theory. It predicted the cosmic background radiation, and this was in fact found, supporting the theory.

From *RascalPuff to Buck Dharwin 4/9/07

286 - Contents

Page 288: Total Field Theory

The two mainstays of Big Bang are Hubble’s 'red shift' expanding universe, and 'cosmic background radiation'. Recent observations find the so called big bang universe to be increasing in its rate of expansion. This is the signature of a repelling force acting across space, 'just like conventional gravity', except, in the opposite direction (preventing the universe from collapsing on its self).The big bang theory has evolved from having a common center, and being a 'cause for the expansion', to elaborately sidestepping the formerly central - since, compliantly metamorphosed - issue of a common center, and apparently ignoring the accumulating observations that the spatially expanding universe is picking up speed. Background radiation was predicted by George Gamow in 1949 and (accidentally) proved in 1963, Gamow proclaimed that such radiation would contribute to a big bang theory.

What background radiation indicates is a relatively more dense universe at earlier times, explicable in more ways than the proposed big bang. Specifically, the observed, controversied

287 - Contents

Page 289: Total Field Theory

background radiation is as much 'proof' of a physically (as well as spatially) expanding universe, that was more dense and hotter at earlier moments than it is at later moments. It appears that the presently abandoned Steady State and Cosmological Constant theories are overdue for reinstatement. Especially since the big bang school is already employing the cosmological constant to prop itself up.

From Buck Dharwin to Rascal Puff I merely pointed out that the theory made a prediction, which was verified, and so it qualifies as a theory.

As for geometric "sidestepping", I see this as the weakest argument in the anti-Banger arsenal. Perhaps you've got an algorithm that maps every existing point in space back to the interior of a singularity, but I'd dearly love to see how it assigns one of these existing points in space the role of "center". This isn't to say that the universe doesn't have a geometric center. For all I know, it does. Wouldn't matter either way.

From Rascal Puff to Buck Dharwin The Big Bang is undone by having no common center. Presently it is yet again

288 - Contents

Page 290: Total Field Theory

undone by the observations that the spatially expanding universe is increasing its speed.The background radiation is more likely the result of an earlier, more dense steady state universe than any big bang. A steady state (no beginning, no end) universe sustains itself without the spontaneous creation of hydrogen: when the physical universe is expanding, as well as being the cause of the spatially expanding universe, by way of the repelling force of the cosmological constant, originating out of all matter parallel to Newton's gravity, while acting in the opposite direction.I am aware that Newton's gravity has been functionally abandoned, whereas 'the curvature of space' and 'geodesics' are explicable by way of the employment of the expansion of matter itself, corresponding with and the cause of the spatially expanding universe. As the status quo stands, Standard Theory is convinced that without the big bang, there is no explanation for the expanding universe. There is an alternative explanation, and that is a physically expanding (physically 4-D) universe, complimenting and causing the observed spatially expanding universe.I submit that the 'curvature of space' will be reinterpreted, to accommodate a physically as

289 - Contents

Page 291: Total Field Theory

well as spatially expanding universe. George Gamow's prediction of background radiation, along with the interpretation of what that means - desperate measures to explain Lemaitre's ad hoc, innovative explanation for the unexpectedly discovered spatially expanding (‘red shift’) universe. The reinstatement of the Cosmological Constant is literally gaining on the Big Bang, via the observed increasing rate of expansion (acceleration).

From PuzzledCow to RascalPuff 4/10/07 “The reinstatement of the Cosmological Constant is literally gaining on the Big Bang, via the observed increasing rate of expansion."Not sure what your point is. The active process by which the expansion is supposed to accelerate is already a part of the big bang theory, be it under the name of "dark energy", "quintessence" or just "cosmological constant", or a combination of three different things - well, the state of the affair is unclear, but basically the big bang and the cosmological constant belongs to the same paradigm.

290 - Contents

Page 292: Total Field Theory

From RascalPuff to PuzzledCow The big bang commenced as a hypothesis based on 'red shift'. In 1949, Gamow predicted that background radiation should exist as a residual hangover from the big bang. Background radiation was detected in 1963 - hastily promoting the big bang to a theory status. Whereas, any expanding universe will inevitably be more dense in its past, as compared to the present, the presently abandoned steady state theory yields the same conclusion while the accelerating expansion of physical matter (in four dimensions) reinstates the steady state theory. The big bang hypothesis evolved into a theory by way of a conceptually polarized, prejudiced interpretation of the cause of the measured background radiation. Moreover and since then, the big bang premise has cavalierly disconnected itself from the requirement of a center source from which it originates.

Now, furthermore proclaiming that the recently and unexpectedly discovered acceleration of the (spatially) expanding universe is caused by the emphatically hypothetical impetus of 'dark energy', 'quintessence' or just (pilfers and tailors the)

291 - Contents

Page 293: Total Field Theory

'cosmological constant' (culminating in what you offer as a 'combination of three different things'); which you proclaim as 'already a part of the big bang theory'. Whereas, reiterating your own words, "...well, the state of the affair is unclear, but basically the big bang and the cosmological constant (steady state theory) belongs (sic) to the same paradigm." The cosmological constant accompanies the steady state theory, and the steady state theory - including the accelerating expansion of (4-D) matter itself - is the rigidly ignored alternative to the big bang, which has embraced and displaced many of the characteristics of lambda and the steady state theory, while simultaneously rejecting them...

Is it your point to say that, if the expanding universe is accelerating, the (repeatedly razed and reconstructed) big bang has it accounted for; by way of hypothesis and/or your unexplained reactivation of the cosmological constant or steady state theory?

4/11/07 PuzzledCow wrote:

292 - Contents

Page 294: Total Field Theory

First, I'm NOT a proponent of the big poof theory. However, that theory is permanently evolving, much like Ptolemy's earth-centric theory was evolving into variants by adding epicycles and deferents.

One of these epicycles is the cosmological constant, an old hat that Einstein had postulated in his original theory in order to keep the universe both finite and static, later was discarded by Einstein, and was put in the circuit again by 2000 or so when cosmologists deduced an acceleration of expansion from observation of the redshifts - the redshifts are no more seen as the result of a Doppler effect but as the expansion of space itself, whatever that means. My previous comments are from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy(the warning at the head of this page confirms that the whole story is unclear).The above dialogue occurred in the 'About Physics' forum of the internet. 10-11/4/07 ************** The Smith Chart Although originally intended for and applied to early radio technology, it's still used by radio technologists, and seems to have a distinguished place in the structural and conceptual considerations at hand - there appears (including

293 - Contents

Page 295: Total Field Theory

the issue of radiation) to be a lot of answers-questions here (in more ways than several dozen?). Its parallel to Maxwell’s field and Riemann’s geometry is self-evident.

Wikipedia

End of Afterward

294 - Contents

Page 296: Total Field Theory

Chapter Twenty Art, Prose & Poetry of the 4-D Space-Time ContinuumThe Non-mathematical Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field

Space-time Gravity Is The 4th Dimension:

Special effects & design by Austin P. Torney

295 - Contents

Page 297: Total Field Theory

For more cost free rhythm and reason, please consider a season that resonantly sings beyond theories of strings.

From Euclid's straight line shine to Isaac's golden apple and its geodesic grapple.

A catchy little tune that most anyone can croon, by the curved silvery light of Albert's expeditionary moon.

Dr. Einstein's waking inspiration may yet sweep the sleeping nation at the slightest provocation.

An unrecognized solution that could start a peaceful revolution. Big Bang Gangology’s further confirmation of their favorite libation - more denial and debate with the

orphaned Steady State.

Behold Albert's resurrected smart bomb with enduring aplomb. Benevolent bomb leaves all the buildings and

people intact; takes 4-D space-time to get them back on track .

Asked the teacher what gravity was, an' all he said is what gravity does. Said I wanna know why, not how

things fall. Teacher said nobody knows that one at all.Asked the people on the 6 O'Clock news; they said on

that we have no views. Same thing happened in a physics lesson - a picture of Newton gave a puzzled

expression. Still wanted to know what gravity is, so I went outside and continued the quiz. Asked a mathematician and he took all day saying gravity is numbers. So I lit one up

and, went into suspension, tintanambulating beyond the 3rd dimension. The answer appeared as a gentle kiss, so

I wrote another poem and it goes like this...

296 - Contents

Page 298: Total Field Theory

Poetry for all times and places, poetry for all rhymes and spaces. Where are the dimensions and where are they not, boundless dimensions of color and thought; infinite dimensions of cold and of hot. But countless

dimensions of space there are not. Dimensions of music, of wine and of thee, of these there

are many, but of space only three.A 3-D you anna 3-D me, munching 3-D apples from a 3-

D tree. 3-D up an' 3-D down, 3-D apples to the 3-D ground. A 3-D fall anna 3-D 'thump'. 3-D sugar inna 3-D

lump.3-D east an' 3-D west, Sir Isaac Newton did his 3-D

best. 3-D universe, 3-D math - 3-D projectiles onna 3-D path. 3-D smooth and 3-D rough; 4-D Einstein singin'

"Three ain't enough." 4-D amplifier and 4-D gear, singin' 4-D lyrics into 3-D

ears. 4-D guitar an' 4-D strings. Albert's 4-D song about 4-D things.

3-D professors onna 3-D jag, stuffin 4-D physics in a 3-D bag.

If yer lookin' for a message in here, it's of 4-D headaches from a 3-D beer. 3-D professors tellin' 3-D

lies, gettin' 3-D money for the Nobel Prize. 3-D scientists onna 3-D pension, refusing to recognize,

space-time gravity is the 4th dimension. (Variations on this thought provoking vignette appear else-where on the net. Copyright 1979, by K. B. Robertson. All

rights reserved. With acknowledgement for authorship, may be reproduced and distributed for educational, recreational and

non commercial purposes.)

297 - Contents

Page 299: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney Art by Richard J. Benish

298 - Contents

Page 300: Total Field Theory

4-D accelerating expansion to macrocosmic infinity.

Copyright 1968 by Masao Komura Special Effects Copyright 2007 by Austin P. TorneyAn ensemble of systems. A Hierarchy of multi-moment 4-D space-time surfaces. - K.B.R

4-D Salted Butter 'n Popcorn Cartoon Genesis

Crackerjack. Morton salt & Land O' Lakes butter. Squared.

-------------------------------------------------------

299 - Contents

Page 301: Total Field Theory

4-D Space-Time Continuum, continued:

It’s everywhere and especially represented in some places in particular.... there is a print-painting of a terrier looking dog with a sailor boy on a box of Crackerjack, holding an inevitably smaller box of Crackerjack, upon which is printed another image of what appears to be the same dog beside another - looks like the same - sailor, only smaller; holding yet another box of Crackerjack; with what would seem has a printed painting of another dog beside another sailor holding a yet smaller box of Crackerjack and so on...

It seems to go on forever, if the pictures could somehow be made ever smaller and still exist, as the visibly descending and/or ascending sequence of images certainly suggests... Geometrically squared rectangular boxes of hierarchically parallel and orthogonal Crackerjack containers and icons, out of infinite smallness proceeding to infinite largeness. Si. Nut city. (It took a while to learn the difference?)

Called me ‘Seahorse’ on the day we met. Gave me an English translated copy of Einstein's, 'Ideas & Opinions'. Mara Benevida Neapolis started it, in Naples, Italy, April of '59 (While Caryn H. Robertson has always underestimated her part in contributing to the evolution and publication of this work, since 1960).

Seahorse spots the ‘displaced’ box of Crackerjack and begins to see in its familiar artwork graphics what he will eventually recognize as an important representation of Einstein’s Unified Field without mathematics. Multi-moment space-time. An ensemble of constantly enlarging and diminishing systems...Ready or not teleported to a place no different than and

300 - Contents

Page 302: Total Field Theory

identical to all the places and times he’s ever known, a day like any other day, only Crackerjack boxes are now showing up in Italy with New World Icons of an ever enlarging - and ever diminishing - blue & white terrier dog with a blue and white sailor boy holding a red striped box of Crackerjack with the image of a Sailor with a Terrier dog, would never again be the same with or without punctuation... Pensive studies widened, more light was let in: wisdom and knowledge proving once again, like gold, to be where you find it.

Who said the ever-smaller sequenced pictures - smaller or larger, past, present & future - had to ‘end’, ever? If the atoms of the universe of the past got ever smaller and the atoms of the universe of the present got ever larger and the painter or printer passed his job on from one generation to the next, where was the ‘end’ of the illustrated hierarchy of images - the multi-moment space-time ensemble of differently sized pictures of the same dog and sailor boy holding a box of Crackerjack with a picture of himself and his dog on it?

Same thing happens on a cylindrical container of MORTON salt, the byword of which is ‘When it rains, it pours." Meaning that humidity or dampness in the air does not prevent the salt from being smoothly dispensed from the container, or whatever shaker it may be contained by. The pictorial logo on this dark blue colored, cylindrically shaped package is a little girl in a yellow skirt, walking in the rain, holding an open umbrella over her head with her right hand; with a container of MORTON salt, pouring out of the metal spout cradled in and under her left hand and arm; upon which is the same pictorial; and so on; squared - same as the CRACKERJACK.

Since then we’ve noticed elsewhere, "Land O Lakes" butter

301 - Contents

Page 303: Total Field Theory

and dairy products 'Where goodness begins'. It's an icon of a beautiful young Native American woman perched on a lake back grounded - presumably Minnesota - mound of grass, offering a sample of the product - in this case, a pound of butter upon which she is the labeled icon; squared. It doesn't look like the Land O Lakes anecdote of 'Where goodness begins' has any explanation of where it ends... Yes. The same thematically endless hierarchy as the multi-moment 4-D MORTON salt icon - 'When it rains (water) it (Morton salt, still) pours', and, the CrackerJack Sailor - squared.

Sort’a like getting a big box of something under the Christmas tree or for your birthday and when you go to open it, it turns into a hierarchy of empty boxes growing ever smaller or larger depending on whether you're wrapping or unwrapping the smallest or largest box... Depending on whether you're giving or receiving the container(s)...

There were too many coincidences, Einstein was caught up in a similar imbroglio, only it was in Bern, Switzerland, just northwest of where all this cartoon compounded dilemma was unfolding and back in the early 20th century.

302 - Contents

Page 304: Total Field Theory

Graphic & special effects by Austin P. Torney

303 - Contents

Page 305: Total Field Theory

A Brief History of Rhyme (The dreaded thread) Poetic science alliance.Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field reinstated w'out mathematics.

The joining of Field with Quantum Mechanics. The exclusion of politics from science.

A scientific paradigm shift in alliance.

Scientific panics at quantum mechanics

Democritus foresaw the invisible atom, but since then his discovery is found with substratrum. From antiquity, and ubiquity the continuous wave was the rave, the magnetic transparent field, all proved to be electrostatically real.

Faraday found the cathode ray. Thompson uncovered electrons one day. Rutherford discovered protons a different way. Temporally understood Maxwell's waves beneath the celestial hood. The wave emitting electron could not be subdivided - at first it was whispered, then openly confided.Yet along came smaller mysterious articles, of Max Planck’s curiously indivisible particles:

Transforming a known world of electrostatics into a schizoid tangle of quantum mechanics. Conceptual doors were opened for the entrance of protons, but no comprehensive vacancy for the residential photons. Other atomic tenants varied in weight height and disguise, but the photon is always the same value and size. A deteriorating atom might change its balance or valence, while the unchanging photon showed no such talents. Vigils are kept to find it changing its station, while its stubborn identity confirms in black body radiation.

304 - Contents

Page 306: Total Field Theory

At dollar conventions where no change is invited, twenty nickels sit down to an audience excited. The quantum takes for granted inclusion, while greenbacks resent the currency of intrusion. To and from spherical shells the electron darts, while the unchanged quantum arrives before it departs.

If you’re looking for a message in here, it’s of Max Planck’s quanta and Niels Bohr’s spheres. Invincible in principle, Newton’s Mechanics are sure as shooting, while quantum mechanics are robbing and looting. Evolutionary experiments are eclectic, but the final conclusions are photoelectric. As though these convulusions are not enough, reality panned out some other stuff. The only certain universal permanancy, is Einstein’s constant light-speed and Heisenberg’s indeterminacy.

Einstein’s fort was special & general relativity, while his Nobel Prize was for photo-electricity. Uncle Albert having firstly proven to be right - ahead of Brownian motion and the speed of light. This century old issue of size is how Einstein won the Nobel Prize - how the peace loving master-blaster stayed alive in 1905.

Anaxgoras of pre biblical days took big and little to greater heights and stays, he said "There’s always something larger than large, and always something smaller than small." Perhaps the smallest large statement of all. May this admonition of illusion be this brief sonnet’s conclusion.

The 20th century path has been rough - to the point of surrendering enough of this stuff.

- K. B. Robertson, Copyright 1979 & 2007 All rights reserved. May be used for non commercial educational and

305 - Contents

Page 307: Total Field Theory

recreational purposes with the stipulation that proper accreditation is extended to the author. Though this ballad may be spiritual or mental, any semblance to education is purely coincidental.

Readers are invited to this paragon of camp, may the poetic winner be rewarded with writer's cramp? Whoever may think that here is no thought, please feel free to carry over and give yer best shot.

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

306 - Contents

Page 308: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

307 - Contents

Page 309: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

308 - Contents

Page 310: Total Field Theory

Special effects by Austin P. Torney

309 - Contents