Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction ... · PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA IBANG BANSA (Foreign relations) 10. PAGPUPUKSA NG KATIWALIAN AT PANGUNGURAKOT SA GOBYERNO (Eradicating

3rd Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey

SWS SPECIAL REPORT

19 October 2017, page 1 of 20

52 Malingap St., Sikatuna Village, Quezon City

Website: www.sws.org.ph

Tel: 924-4456, 924-4465

Fax: 920-2181

Oct 19 - Satisfaction with National Admin Overall and on Issues (Special report_FINAL).docx

Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey:

Net satisfaction rating of the Duterte National Administration at "Very Good" +58

• Excellent in Mindanao; Very Good in Visayas, Balance Luzon, and Metro Manila

• Very Good on 4, Good on 8, and Moderate on 5 subjects

• Net rating improves on 1 subject, declines on 4 subjects, steady on others

Social Weather Stations

The Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey, done on September 23-27, 2017, found 71% of

adult Filipinos satisfied, 16% neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and 13% dissatisfied with the general

performance of the current National Administration, for a net satisfaction rating of +58 (% satisfied minus

% dissatisfied), classified by SWS as very good [Chart 1; Table 1].

This is 6 points below the very good +64 (75% satisfied, 11% dissatisfied) in June 2017.

Excellent in Mindanao; Very Good in Visayas, Balance Luzon, and Metro Manila

The 6-point decline in the Duterte Administration’s general net satisfaction rating was due to

declines of 16 points in Metro Manila and 11 points in Balance Luzon, combined with increases of 2

points in Mindanao and 1 point in the Visayas.

The National Administration’s net rating stayed excellent in Mindanao, at +74 in September 2017,

up by 2 points from +72 in June 2017 [Chart 2; Table 2].

It stayed very good in the Visayas, at +57 in September, hardly changing from +56 in June.

It stayed very good in Balance Luzon, at +52 in September, although down by 11 points from +63

in June.

It also stayed very good in Metro Manila, at +51 in September, although down by 16 points from

+67 in June.

Very Good in classes ABC and D; Good in class E

The National Administration’s net satisfaction rating stayed very good in class ABC, at +60 in

September 2017, up by 5 points from +55 in June 2017 [Chart 3; Table 3].

It stayed very good in class D or the masa, at +60 in September, although 4 points below the +64

in June.

http://www.sws.org.ph/


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


However, it fell by one grade from very good to good in class E, at +46 in September, down by 22

points from +68 in June.

Double-digit declines in the National Administration’s net satisfaction rating occurred among men,

among 55 year olds and above, and among non-elementary school graduates and college graduates

[Table 4].

The SWS terminology for net satisfaction ratings is as follows: +70 and above, “excellent”; +50

to +69, “very good”; +30 to +49, “good”; +10 to +29, “moderate”, +9 to –9, “neutral”; –10 to –29,

“poor”; –30 to –49, “bad”; –50 to –69, “very bad”; –70 and below, “execrable.”

Very Good on 4, Good on 8, and Moderate on 5 subjects

Out of 17 specific performance subjects rated, the net satisfaction ratings of the Duterte

administration were very good on 4 subjects, good on 8 subjects, and moderate on 5 subjects. SWS calls

this its Governance Report Card [Tables 5 and 6].

The net rating of the National Administration was very good on: Helping the poor (+67),

Protecting the environment (+58), Defending the country's territorial rights (+52), and Providing jobs

(+50) [Charts 4 to 7].

It was good on: Distributing lands to deserving tillers under land reform (+49), Fighting terrorism

(+47), Protecting human rights (+46), Foreign relations (+40), Reconciling with Muslim rebels (+38),

Eradicating graft and corruption (+35), Reconciling with communist rebels (+35), and Fighting crimes

(+30) [Charts 8 to 15].

It was moderate on: Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry (+29), Recovering the ''hidden

wealth'' stolen by Marcos and his cronies (+28), Resolving the traffic problem (+22), Solving the problem

of extra judicial killings or EJK (+22), Fighting inflation (+21) [Charts 16 to 20].

National Administration’s net rating improves on 1 subject, declines on 4 subjects, steady on others

The September 2017 survey found the National Administration’s net rating improved on 1 specific

subject, declined on 4 subjects, and steady on others, compared to when they were last surveyed.

The National Administration’s net rating rose by one grade from good to very good on Protecting

the environment, at +58, up by 26 points from +32 in March 2015.

It stayed very good on three specific subjects.

The very good +67 on Helping the poor was 2 points above the very good +65 in June.

The very good +52 on Defending the country's territorial rights hardly changed from the very good

+51 in June.


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


The very good +50 on Providing jobs hardly changed from the very good +51 in June.

It stayed good on six specific subjects.

The good +38 on Reconciling with Muslim rebels was 6 points above the good +32 in June.

The good +35 on Reconciling with communist rebels was 4 points above the good +31 in June.

The good +47 on Fighting terrorism was 2 points below the good +49 in June.

The good +40 on Foreign relations was 3 points below the good +44 in June.

The good +35 on Eradicating graft and corruption was 8 points below the good +43 in June.

The good +30 on Fighting crimes was 13 points below the good +43 in June.

The National Administration’s net rating stayed moderate on three specific subjects.

The moderate +28 on Recovering the ''hidden wealth'' stolen by Marcos and his cronies was 2

points above the moderate +26 in June.

The moderate +22 on Resolving the traffic problem was 3 points below the moderate +25 in June.

The moderate +21 on Fighting inflation was 3 points below the moderate +24 in June.

However, it fell by one grade from very good to good on two subjects.

The good +49 on Distributing lands to deserving tillers under land reform was 4 points below the

very good +53 in September 2016.

The good +46 on Protecting human rights was 9 points below the very good +55 in June.

It fell by one grade from good to moderate on two subjects.

The moderate +29 on Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry was 2 points below the good

+32 in June.

The moderate +22 on Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK was 12 points below

the good +34 in June.

Survey Background

The Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey was conducted from September 23-27, 2017 using

face-to-face interviews of 1,500 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 600 in Balance Luzon, and

300 each in Metro Manila, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±2.5% for national

percentages, ±4% for Balance Luzon, and ±6% each for Metro Manila, Visayas, and Mindanao).

The area estimates were weighted by Philippine Statistics Authority medium-population

projections for 2017 to obtain the national estimates.


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


The Social Weather Survey items on public satisfaction with the general performance of the

National Administration, and its performance on specific subjects, are non-commissioned. These items

were included on SWS's own initiative and released as a public service.

The satisfaction rating of the general performance of the National Administration is based on a

single question, and is not an average of answers to separate questions on specific subjects. The general

rating is repeated every quarter, whereas only a core of the specific subject-ratings are repeated. Subjects

are included or excluded depending on their contemporary salience.

SWS employs its own staff for questionnaire design, sampling, fieldwork, data-processing, and

analysis, and does not outsource any of its survey operations.

The survey question on public satisfaction with the overall performance of the national

administration is as follows: "Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa

kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? Kayo po ba ay LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO

NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, o

LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? [On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration? Are you VERY SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF

SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED?]"

For the specific subjects, the survey questions are as follows: " GAANO PO KAYO NASISIYAHAN

O HINDI NASISIYAHAN SA PAMAMALAKAD NG KASALUKUYANG ADMINISTRASYONG

NASYONAL TUNGKOL SA (PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES)? MASASABI BA NINYONG KAYO AY

LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI,

MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, O LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN? PAKISAGOT PO ANG MGA

ITO SA PAMAMAGITAN NG PAGLALAGAY NG BAWAT KARD SA NAAANGKOP NA LUGAR SA

RATING BOARD NA ITO. (SHUFFLE CARD) [How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present

national administration’s performance in (programs or activities)? Would you say that you are VERY

SATISFIED, SOMEWHAT SATISFIED, UNDECIDED IF SATISFIED OR NOT, SOMEWHAT

DISSATISFIED, or VERY DISSATISFIED? You may indicate your answers by placing each card on the

appropriate box on this rating board. (SHUFFLE CARD)]"

1. PAGLABAN SA TERORISMO (Fighting terrorism)

2. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG MUSLIM UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with Muslim rebels)

3. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA MGA REBELDENG KOMUNISTA UPANG ANG MGA ITO AY

MAGBALIK-LOOB SA PAMAHALAAN (Reconciliation with communist rebels)

4. PAGTUTULONG SA MGA MAHIHIRAP (Helping the poor)


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


5. PAGLALABAN SA PAGTAAS NG PRESYO (Fighting inflation)

6. PANINIGURO NA WALANG PAMILYANG KAILANMAN AY MAGUGUTOM AT WALANG

MAKAIN (Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry and have nothing to eat)

7. PAGBIBIGAY NG HANAPBUHAY (Providing jobs)

8. PAGRESOLBA NG PROBLEMA SA TRAFFIC (Resolving the traffic problem)

9. PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA IBANG BANSA (Foreign relations)

10. PAGPUPUKSA NG KATIWALIAN AT PANGUNGURAKOT SA GOBYERNO (Eradicating

graft and corruption in government)

11. PAGBAWI NG MGA YAMAN NA NINAKAW AT TINAGO NINA MARCOS AT ANG

KANYANG MGA KASABWAT O "CRONY" (Recovering the "hidden wealth" stolen by Marcos

and his cronies)

12. PAGTATANGGOL SA TERITORYO NG BANSA (Defending the country's territorial rights)

13. PAGLALABAN SA MGA KRIMENG BUMIBIKTIMA SA ORDINARYONG MAMAMAYAN

TULAD NG PAGPATAY, HOLDAP, PAGNANAKAW, PANANAKIT NA PISIKAL, ATBP.

(Fighting crimes that victimize ordinary citizens, like killings, holdups, robberies, physical

violence, etc.)

14. PAGLUTAS NG PROBLEMA NG “EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS” O EJK (Solving the

problem of “Extrajudicial Killings” or EJK)

15. PAGTATANGGOL SA KARAPATANG PANTAO (Protection of human rights)

16. PAMAMAHAGI NG LUPA SA MGA KARAPAT-DAPAT NA MAGBUBUKID SA ILALIM NG

REPORMA SA LUPA (Distributing lands to deserving tillers under land reform)

17. PAGTATANGGOL NG KAPALIGIRAN (Protecting the environment)

SWS terminology for Net Satisfaction Ratings: +70 and above, "excellent"; +50 to +69, "very

good"; +30 to +49, "good"; +10 to +29, "moderate", +9 to –9, "neutral"; –10 to –29, "poor"; –30 to –

49, "bad"; –50 to –69, "very bad"; –70 and below, "execrable"]. A single-digit net satisfaction is

considered not significantly different from zero.

#


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 1

Table 1

Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather ReportSeptember 23-27, 2017 National Survey

* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINES, FEB 1989 – SEP 2017

C. AQUINO RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

+58

VG

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


* Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused responses. Q: Sa pangkalahatan, gaano po kayo nasisiyahan o hindi nasisiyahan sa kasalukuyang administrasyong nasyonal? (SHOWCARD) LUBOS NA NASISIYAHAN, MEDYO NASISIYAHAN, HINDI TIYAK KUNG NASISIYAHAN O HINDI, MEDYO HINDI NASISIYAHAN, LUBOS NA HINDI NASISIYAHAN

C. AQUINOFEB 89 +23SEP 89 +14APR 90 +17NOV 90 -10JUL 91 - 1NOV 91 + 1FEB 92 - 2APR 92 - 5

RAMOSSEP 92 +32DEC 92 +30APR 93 +24JUL 93 +31SEP 93 +14DEC 93 +24APR 94 +15AUG 94 +14NOV 94 +16DEC 94 +17MAR 95 +10JUN 95 + 6OCT 95 -18DEC 95 - 3APR 96 0JUN 96 +11

NET* SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE

OF THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: PHILIPPINESRAMOS (cont.)

SEP 96 +10DEC 96 - 1APR 97 +28JUN 97 +31SEP 97 + 5DEC 97 +20FEB 98 + 8MAR 98 + 9

ESTRADASEP 98 +19NOV 98 +36MAR 99 +34JUN 99 +28OCT 99 + 2DEC 99 - 8MAR 00 + 6JUL 00 +24SEP 00 +10DEC 00 + 2

ARROYOMAR 01 +27JUL 01 +12SEP 01 + 8NOV 01 +27MAR 02 +12

ARROYO (cont.)MAY 02 0SEP 02 +15NOV 02 +13MAR 03 - 3JUN 03 +23SEP 03 - 6NOV 03 +3MAR 04 +14AUG 04 +15DEC 04 + 3MAR 05 - 6MAY 05 -13AUG 05 -11DEC 05 -15MAR 06 -15JUN 06 + 2SEP 06 - 3NOV 06 - 2FEB 07 - 3SEP 07 + 9DEC 07 -11MAR 08 -19JUN 08 -21SEP 08 -4DEC 08 -1FEB 09 -19

ARROYO (cont.)JUN 09 -11SEP 09 -20DEC 09 -22MAR 10 -45

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +64NOV 10 +64MAR 11 +46JUN 11 +45SEP 11 +56DEC 11 +56MAR 12 +46MAY 12 +44AUG 12 +62DEC 12 +57MAR 13 +53JUN 13 +66SEP 13 +56DEC 13 +51MAR 14 +45JUN 14 +29SEP 14 +35DEC 14 +34MAR 15 +19JUN 15 +31

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 15 +37DEC 15 +39APR 16 +35JUN 16 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +66DEC 16 +61MAR 17 +66JUN 17 +64SEP 17 +58


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 2

Table 2




NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by AREA, FEB 1989 – SEP 2017


NCR: +51BAL LUZ: +52VIS: +57

MIN: +74

1989 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


C. AQUINOFEB 89 - 2 +22 +28 +37SEP 89 + 7 + 2 +25 +31APR 90 - 4 +24 +18 +15NOV 90 -42 -12 + 3 + 3JUL 91 -28 - 4 +14 + 5NOV 91 -23 0 +13 + 4FEB 92 -18 - 4 + 3 + 7APR 92 -13 - 2 - 2 - 8

RAMOSSEP 92 +35 +34 +23 +34DEC 92 +12 +34 +31 +35APR 93 + 5 +31 +18 +26JUL 93 0 +34 +28 +46SEP 93 0 +15 +16 +22DEC 93 +15 +30 +12 +29APR 94 +13 +19 + 4 +19AUG 94 + 9 +15 +10 +16NOV 94 + 4 +24 +10 +16DEC 94 + 8 +19 +19 +14MAR 95 -17 +19 - 2 +20JUN 95 - 4 +14 - 5 + 9OCT 95 -22 -22 -18 - 9DEC 95 -19 - 3 0 + 7APR 96 -15 + 2 - 9 +13

NCR LUZ VIS MIN

*Net figures (% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied) correctly rounded.

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 - 9 +17 +13 +11SEP 96 + 4 +16 +10 + 1DEC 96 + 7 + 1 -12 + 3APR 97 +31 +35 +15 +24JUN 97 +23 +34 +30 +32SEP 97 + 5 +16 -24 +11DEC 97 +19 +24 + 5 +29

ESTRADASEP 98 +19 +22 +15 +17NOV 98 +33 +41 +20 +42MAR 99 +34 +38 +18 +40JUN 99 +23 +35 +15 +30OCT 99 + 9 + 4 -10 + 7DEC 99 -14 - 9 -19 + 4MAR 00 + 2 + 8 - 4 +16JUL 00 +25 +30 - 3 +36SEP 00 + 7 +12 - 1 +20DEC 00 -14 0 -11 +31

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +25 +30JUL 01 +3 + 4 +18 +26SEP 01 - 7 + 2 +19 +19NOV 01 +7 +27 +32 +35

ARROYO (cont.)MAR 02 - 6 + 7 +29 +17MAY 02 - 3 - 5 - 2 +16SEP 02 - 3 +18 + 4 +28NOV 02 -13 + 5 +23 +34MAR 03 - 6 - 3 + 3 - 6JUN 03 +23 +22 +35 +13SEP 03 - 4 -11 + 2 - 6NOV 03 -15 -7 +19 +18MAR 04 - 6 +13 +27 +18AUG 04 - 5 + 7 +39 +22DEC 04 -11 -5 +17 +16MAR 05 -22 -20 +25 + 5MAY 05 -43 -23 -4 +17AUG 05 -25 -10 +8 -18DEC 05 -27 -11 -9 -21MAR 06 -33 - 8 - 7 -24JUN 06 -35 + 4 +19 + 6SEP 06 +29 - 3 + 5 + 3NOV 06 -10 - 2 + 5 - 1FEB 07 -20 - 6 -2 +12SEP 07 -10 + 8 +17 +16DEC 07 -24 -9 -9 -10MAR 08 -32 -20 -8 -17JUN 08 -27 -16 -26 -23SEP 08 -14 -5 -4 +4


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by LOCATION (page 1 of 2)NCR LUZ VIS MIN NCR LUZ VIS MIN


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 3


ARROYO (cont.)DEC 08 -20 -1 +12 +1FEB 09 -29 -16 -21 -18JUN 09 -19 -12 -12 -2SEP 09 -22 -21 -21 -15DEC 09 -33 -18 -23 -20MAR 10 -57 -45 -39 -44

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +68 +66 +60 +61NOV 10 +49 +69 +59 +67MAR 11 +50 +42 +51 +47JUN 11 +48 +37 +47 +57SEP 11 +44 +59 +51 +63DEC 11 +64 +52 +58 +56MAR 12 +46 +39 +49 +55MAY 12 +41 +45 +29 +58AUG 12 +56 +65 +64 +59DEC 12 +47 +54 +66 +63MAR 13 +43 +54 +45 +63JUN 13 +53 +68 +76 +63SEP 13 +45 +59 +60 +53DEC 13 +30 +52 +51 +64MAR 14 +37 +41 +45 +56JUN 14 +16 +26 +41 +34

NCR LUZ VIS MIN


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by LOCATION (page 2 of 2)

B. AQUINO (cont.)SEP 14 +36 +24 +45 +46DEC 14 +21 +35 +31 +43MAR 15 +21 +8 +34 +26JUN 15 +18 +29 +43 +34SEP 15 +24 +44 +34 +34DEC 15 +36 +35 +52 +36APR 16 +17 +30 +58 +33JUN 16 +32 +45 +62 +60

DUTERTESEP 16 +66 +60 +62 +81DEC 16 +53 +56 +58 +78MAR 17 +62 +60 +67 +79JUN 17 +67 +63 +56 +72SEP 17 +51 +52 +57 +74

NCR LUZ VIS MIN





NATIONAL ADMIN., by ECONOMIC CLASS, FEB 1989 – SEP 2017


ABC: +60D: +60

E: +46

1988 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Table 3


C. AQUINOFEB 89 +25 +17 +38SEP 89 - 5 +14 +22APR 90 +26 +16 +15NOV 90 -47 - 7 + 1JUL 91 -27 - 2 +10NOV 91 -25 + 1 +10FEB 92 -25 0 + 2APR 92 -21 - 4 + 2

RAMOSSEP 92 +26 +42 +36DEC 92 +20 +29 +42APR 93 +17 +22 +33JUL 93 + 3 +33 +39SEP 93 + 8 +11 +31DEC 93 +23 +23 +26APR 94 + 5 +16 +17AUG 94 + 9 +13 +19NOV 94 + 8 +17 +18DEC 94 +10 +14 +28MAR 95 - 5 +11 +13JUN 95 - 8 + 8 + 9OCT 95 -14 -20 -14DEC 95 -19 - 3 + 3APR 96 -14 - 3 +17

ABC D E

RAMOS (cont.)JUN 96 + 4 +12 +10SEP 96 + 8 + 5 +27DEC 96 +16 - 5 + 6APR 97 +33 +27 +27JUN 97 +39 +31 +27SEP 97 + 8 + 3 +14DEC 97 +27 +20 +17FEB 98 + 2 + 7 +18MAR 98 + 3 + 9 +11SEP 98 + 6 +18 +34

ESTRADANOV 98 +27 +37 +36MAR 99 +27 +34 +38JUN 99 +20 +29 +30OCT 99 + 5 0 +10DEC 99 - 9 -10 - 2MAR 00 + 4 + 6 + 8JUL 00 +18 +24 +28SEP 00 - 5 +10 +20DEC 00 -30 + 3 +13

ARROYOMAR 01 +30 +25 +29JUL 01 +16 +11 +12

ABC D E

ARROYO (cont.)SEP 01 0 + 7 +13NOV 01 +14 +30 +16MAR 02 +17 +15 + 1MAY 02 - 4 -3 +11SEP 02 + 7 +19 + 6NOV 02 + 1 +17 + 7MAR 03 -16 0 - 7JUN 03 +40 +19 +27SEP 03 + 5 - 7 - 8NOV 03 -14 0 +16MAR 04 +6 +15 +15AUG 04 +22 +15 +14DEC 04 + 1 - 3 +19MAR 05 -21 - 5 + 2MAY 05 -15 -18 0AUG 05 - 2 -11 -15DEC 05 - 9 -17 -12MAR 06 -37 -9 -24JUN 06 - 1 + 4 - 3SEP 06 - 9 - 1 - 6NOV 06 +10 - 4 - 1FEB 07 + 4 - 2 - 6SEP 07 +20 +8 +9DEC 07 -21 -9 -13MAR 08 -18 -19 -19

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 1 of 2)



ARROYO (cont.)JUN 08 -24 -19 -25SEP 08 -14 -2 -5DEC 08 0 +2 -7FEB 09 -26 -20 -16JUN 09 -12 -12 -7SEP 09 -35 -21 -15DEC 09 -34 -22 -17MAR 10 -47 -47 -41

B. AQUINOSEP 10 +65 +66 +57NOV 10 +62 +64 +65MAR 11 +19 +46 +50JUN 11 +45 +48 +36SEP 11 +62 +57 +52DEC 11 +54 +57 +53MAR 12 +38 +44 +52MAY 12 +27 +44 +50AUG 12 +69 +62 +60DEC 12 +78 +54 +62MAR 13 +68 +50 +60JUN 13 +61 +65 +71SEP 13 +62 +56 +54DEC 13 +54 +51 +50

ABC D E

B. AQUINO (cont.)MAR 14 +32 +45 +48JUN 14 +27 +27 +38SEP 14 +47 +33 +38DEC 14 +41 +32 +40MAR 15 +19 +18 +24JUN 15 +33 +29 +38SEP 15 +21 +38 +40DEC 15 +23 +39 +44APR 16 +17 +32 +46JUN 16 +24 +51 +50

DUTERTESEP 16 +58 +68 +62DEC 16 +55 +61 +62MAR 17 +61 +66 +69JUN 17 +55 +64 +68SEP 17 +60 +60 +46

ABC D E


NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, by ECONOMIC CLASS (page 2 of 2)



SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Table 4


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO SEP 2017 (page 1 of 2)

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17

Total PH 75% 75% 71% 16% 13% 16% 9% 11% 13% +66 +64 +58

NCR 75 77 70 12 13 11 13 10 19 +62 +67 +51

Bal. Luzon 70 75 66 20 13 20 10 12 14 +60 +63 +52

Visayas 76 70 70 15 16 16 9 14 13 +67 +56 +57

Mindanao 84 80 81 11 13 13 5 7 6 +79 +72 +74

Urban 77 75 73 13 15 14 11 10 13 +66 +65 +60

Rural 73 76 69 19 12 18 7 12 13 +66 +64 +56

ABC 72 62 71 16 31 18 12 7 11 +61 +55 +60

D 75 75 72 16 13 15 9 11 12 +66 +64 +60

E 75 80 62 19 8 21 6 12 16 +69 +68 +46


PUBLIC SATISFACTION WITH GENERAL PERFORMANCE OF THE

NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: MAR 2017 TO SEP 2017 (page 2 of 2)

*% Satisfied minus % Dissatisfied correctly rounded. Ignores Don’t Know and Refused to Answer responses.Question. On the overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the present national administration? Are you very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, undecided if satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied?

Satisfied Undecided Dissatisfied Net*

Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17

Total PH 75% 75% 71% 16% 13% 16% 9% 11% 13% +66 +64 +58

Men 76 79 68 16 11 17 8 10 14 +68 +68 +54

Women 74 72 73 16 16 15 10 12 11 +64 +60 +62

18-24 74 74 71 19 15 18 7 11 10 +67 +64 +61

25-34 77 74 77 15 13 13 8 12 10 +68 +62 +68

35-44 75 76 70 17 13 16 8 11 13 +67 +65 +56

45-54 75 74 68 14 13 18 10 12 14 +65 +62 +53

55 + 74 77 68 17 13 17 9 10 14 +65 +67 +54

Some Elem 72 78 62 20 14 23 8 8 14 +64 +70 +47

Some HS 74 75 67 18 11 18 9 14 14 +65 +61 +53

Some Voc/Coll 75 73 75 15 17 13 9 11 11 +66 +62 +64

Coll. Grad 81 83 73 11 7 15 8 10 12 +74 +72 +60


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Table 5

Table 6


Overall performance rating 71% 16% 13% +58

Helping the poor 79 9 12 +67

Protecting the environment 71 16 12 +58

Defending the country's territorial rights 67 18 15 +52

Providing jobs 68 15 17 +50

Distributing lands to deserving tillers under land reform 64 20 15 +49

Fighting terrorism 65 16 19 +47

Protecting human rights 64 17 18 +46

Foreign relations 58 23 18 +40

Reconciling with Muslim rebels 59 20 21 +38

Eradicating graft and corruption 58 18 24 +35

Reconciling with communist rebels 56 22 21 +35

Fighting crimes 56 17 26 +30

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry 55 18 26 +29

Recovering the ''hidden wealth'' stolen

by Marcos and his cronies 52 24 24 +28

Resolving the traffic problem 52 17 30 +22

Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK 51 18 30 +22

Fighting inflation 53 15 32 +21


SAT UND DIS NET

SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, SEP 2017

Very Good

Good (8)

Very Good (4)

Mode-rate (5)


Overall performance rating +61 +66 +64 +58

Helping the poor +66 +63 +65 +67

Protecting the environment +32 (Mar15) +58

Defending the country's territorial rights +54 +46 +51 +52

Providing jobs +51 +43 +51 +50

Distributing lands to deserving tillers under land reform +49

Fighting terrorism +41 +47 +49 +47

Protecting human rights +23 +55 +46

Foreign relations +46 +46 +44 +40

Reconciling with Muslim rebels +33 +33 +32 +38

Eradicating graft and corruption +45 +39 +43 +35

Reconciling with communist rebels +30 +32 +31 +35

Fighting crimes +50 +41 +43 +30

Ensuring that no family will ever be hungry +34 +22 +32 +29

Recovering the ''hidden wealth'' stolen

by Marcos and his cronies +24 +22 +26 +28

Resolving the traffic problem +21 +25 +22

Solving the problem of extra judicial killings or EJK +40 +37 +34 +22

Fighting inflation +25 +13 +24 +21


Dec16 Mar17 Jun17 Sep17

NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON SPECIFIC ISSUES: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2016 – SEP 2017

Very Good

Good (8)

Very Good (4)

Mode-rate (5)


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 4

Chart 5


RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON HELPING THE POOR: PHILIPPINES, DEC 1993 – SEP 2017


+67

VG

1993 1998 ..2001 2004 .2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE

NET* SATISFACTION RATINGS OF THE NATIONAL

ADMINISTRATION ON PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT:

PHILIPPINES, JUN 2006 - SEP 2017


+58

VG

2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 6

Chart 7




ON DEFENDING THE COUNTRY’S TERRITORIAL RIGHTS:

PHILIPPINES, MAR 1999 – SEP 2017


+52

VG

1999 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


NET SATISFACTION* WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

ON PROVIDING JOBS: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1998 – SEP 2017


+50


VG

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 8

Chart 9




ON DISTRIBUTING LANDS UNDER LAND REFORM: PHILIPPINES,

NOV 1998 - SEP 2017


+49

G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON FIGHTING TERRORISM: PHILIPPINES, NOV 2002 – SEP 2017


+47

G

2002 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 10

Chart 11



ON PROMOTING/PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2016 – JUN 2017


+46

G


1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction



ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: PHILIPPINES, SEP 1992 – SEP 2017

+40

RAMOS ESTRADA ARROYO B. AQUINO DUTERTE


G

1992 1998 .2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 12

Chart 13



NET* SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATION ON

RECONCILING WITH MUSLIM REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – SEP 2017


+38

G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction





ERADICATING GRAFT AND CORRUPTION: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 1987 – SEP 2017

+35

G

1987 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

+70

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 14

Chart 15




ON RECONCILING WITH COMMUNIST REBELS: PHILIPPINES,

SEP 1998 – SEP 2017

+35


G

1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction




ON FIGHTING CRIMES: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1990 – SEP 2017


+30

G

1990 1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 16

Chart 17




ENSURING THAT NO FAMILY WILL BE HUNGRY: PHILIPPINES,

DEC 2004 – SEP 2017

+29


M

2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction




ON RECOVERING THE ''HIDDEN WEALTH'' STOLEN BY MARCOS

AND HIS CRONIES: PHILIPPINES, JUN 2002 – SEP 2017


+28

M

Net*

Satisfaction

2002 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

+30


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 18

Chart 19


B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON RESOLVING THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM: PHILIPPINES,

MAR 2017 TO SEP 2017


+22

M

* 2016 * 2017 *

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


B. AQUINO DUTERTE


ON SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF EXTRA JUDICIAL KILLINGS OR

EJK: PHILIPPINES, DEC 2016 – SEP 2017


+22

M

* 2016 * 2017 *

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

Net*

Satisfaction


SWS SPECIAL REPORT


Chart 20

Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Report

September 23-27, 2017 National Survey



ON FIGHTING INFLATION: PHILIPPINES, NOV 1991 – SEP 2017


+21

M

1992 1998 2001 2004 2010 2017

+10

+30

+50

-10

-30

-50

Net*

Satisfaction

Documents

Third Quarter 2017 Social Weather Survey: Net satisfaction ... · PAKIKIPAG-UGNAYAN SA IBANG BANSA (Foreign relations) 10. PAGPUPUKSA NG KATIWALIAN AT PANGUNGURAKOT SA GOBYERNO (Eradicating