16
THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT INFORMATION: RELIABILITY Kevin Klipfel, Information Literacy Coordinator, California State University, Chico. [email protected]

Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

  • Upload
    marrim

  • View
    47

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability. Kevin Klipfel, Information Literacy Coordinator , California State University, Chico. [email protected]. Thinking Critically About Sources. Is this source r eliable? Is this the best source for my current purposes?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT INFORMATION: RELIABILITY

Kevin Klipfel, Information Literacy Coordinator, California State University, Chico. [email protected]

Page 2: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Thinking Critically About Sources Is this source reliable? Is this the best source for my current

purposes?

Page 3: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Scholarly vs. “Popular” SourcesStyle “Popular” Articles “Scholarly” ArticlesWritten by? Non-Experts

(Usually. For example, a newspaper or magazine reporter.)

Experts in the field(For example: a professor or research scientist.)

Written for? A general audience Other experts in the field

Written How? General, “Everyday” language

Technical, “Scholarly” language

Page 4: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Scholarly vs. “Popular” SourcesReliability “Popular” Articles “Scholarly” ArticlesEditorial Review? Limited – Non-expert Rigorous – “Peer

Reviewed” by other scholars

References? Not Usually – though sometimes the article will be based on scholarship that is mentioned in the article

Yes – most claims the author makes are explicitly verified through footnotes and citations

Trustworthy? It depends - look for articles based in scholarship)

Infallible? No. But pretty much as good as it gets

Page 5: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

“Scholarly” Articles and Reliability Scholarly articles are typically preferred

for research because they’re the most likely to be reliable or trustworthy. You can easily verify what they say (with

footnotes, references, etc.). They provide empirical evidence for the

stuff they say (especially in the natural and social sciences).

They argue, using the rules of logic, for the stuff they say (especially in the humanities).

Page 6: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Other Types of Sources Other types of don’t necessarily do this:

Editorials may just express the options of an editor (without being backed by reasons and verifiable evidence).

Popular sources (like magazine articles) may not be peer reviewed and do not usually provide references.

Television and political pundits– how “scholarly” are they”?

Page 7: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Reliability Factors: Verifiability Verifiability: maybe the most important

criterion. Can I check (i.e. “verify”) what this author is

saying. Are they providing evidence for their claims. Are they arguing for their positions?

Is the evidence they use in support of their arguments good evidence?

Are their arguments logically sound?

Underlying question: Is the author merely stating their opinions or is there good reason to believe what they say?

Page 8: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Currency: Is this Source Relevant? How recent is the source? Have there been new breakthroughs on

this subject since my article has been written? If not, the article is probably current.

Page 9: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Reliability Factors: Pedigree Who wrote it?

What is the affiliation of the author? A university? Newspaper? Anonymous blogger?

Where does the article appear? Scholarly journal? Is it peer reviewed? Is it a

top journal in its field?

Page 10: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Pedigree: Top Journals

Page 11: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Is it Peer Reviewed? There’s no way to know for sure just by looking

at an article. The most sure way you can find out is by using

one of our library resources: Ulrich’s Web. With books, the best thing to do is see if it was

published by a reputable academic press (e.g., University of California, Oxford University Press, etc.).

If you’re having trouble figuring out if a book or an article is peer-reviewed, the best thing to do is ask a librarian.

Page 12: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Reliability: A Matter of Degree The best way to think of reliability is that

reliability falls on a continuum.

Page 13: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Tastiness … A Continuum.

Truly DeliciousLeast

PleasantThing Ever

Eating In-N-Out Burger!

PB & J

Eating Ramen. Every day. For 4 years.

Page 14: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Reliability … A Continuum.

Most ReliableLeast

Reliable Peer Reviewed

“Popular”Articles Based in Research

Articles Not Based in Research

Page 16: Thinking Critically about Information: Reliability

Contact a Librarian And if you’re having any trouble

evaluating information, don’t forget to contact a librarian: we’re more than happy to help!

For questions about this module, or how to incorporate this module into specific courses, contact: Kevin Klipfel, Information Literacy Coordinator, California State University, Chico. Contact: [email protected]