20
The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235) Reducing the Impact of Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System

The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235). Reducing the Impact of Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System. ABA Racial Justice Improvement Project. Has identified over 40,000 consequences of criminal convictions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

The Records Privacy Act of 2011(SB 5019/HB 1235)

Reducing the Impact of Racial Disparity in the

Criminal Justice System

Page 2: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Has identified over 40,000 consequences of criminal convictions.

Found 584 Washington state laws imposing consequences for criminal convictions.

Sources: ABA Criminal Consequences Demonstration Site, http://isrweb.isr.temple.edu/projects/accproject/pages/GetStateRecords.cfm?State=WA;

Prof. Cynthia Jones, panel speech to the American Constitution Society (June 17, 2011), available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlExXuBeYjU at 55:23-56:08.

ABA Racial Justice Improvement Project

Page 3: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Racial Disparity in the Consequences

White candidates with a criminal conviction were half as likely to be called in for a job interview as a person without the record.

African Americans with a criminal record, were 2/3 less likely to be offered interviews.

Source: Devah Pager, “The Mark of a Criminal Record” (2003)

Page 4: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

“GUILTY BY GOOGLE”

Page 5: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

African and Native Americans are arrested at rates greater than their representation in the population.

Afr. Amer: 12% arrested/ 3.2% of pop.Nat. Amer: 3.2% arrested/ 1.6% of pop.

Asian Amer: 3.1% arrested/ 5.5% of pop.“White”: 81.5% arrested/ 81.8% of pop.

Sources:2010 Statistics for arrests by race compiled by WASPCCensus data available at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US53&-

qr_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U

Page 6: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

How many could SB 5019 help?

In Washington in 2010 …

24,181 African Americans were arrested6,385 Native Americans were arrested6,276 Asian Americans were arrested162,576 “Whites” were arrested

Sources:2010 Statistics for arrests by race compiled by WASPCCensus data available at http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US53&-qr_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1&-

ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U

Page 7: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

How many people suffer based on arrest alone?

Nearly ½ of filed misdemeanor cases result in no conviction.

Almost ¼ of felony charges are dismissed without conviction.

Source: compiled from data on www.courts.wa.gov

Page 8: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Real Life Stories

female (Hispanic)

single mother & computer engineer, falsely accused of child rape while fleeing abusive relationship, acquitted.

False accusation of rape continues to show up when she applies for jobs.

Page 9: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Real Life Stories

R.B. (ethnicity?)

high school student, charged with MIP, completed diversion, case dismissed.

rejected as a volunteer once employer saw charge on her record.

Page 10: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Real Life Stories

C.A. (Afr. Amer.)

8-year-old-misdemeanor dismissed after def. sentence completed

repeatedly denied employment and told he was unemployable due to

felony record.

Page 11: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Real Life Stories

E. R. (Afr. Amer.)

2 misdemeanor arrests, no convictions

Lost multiple jobs and his records are still available even though were sealed by the Court.

Page 12: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Real Life Stories

J. S. (White)

19-year-old misdemeanor dismissed after arrest; no conviction

friend denied mortgage because he was co-signer and lender did

background check.

Page 13: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)
Page 14: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)
Page 15: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)
Page 16: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)
Page 17: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

SB 5019/ HB 1235 Petition to keep “exonerating dispo.” confidential;

Defines “exonerating disposition”;

Places burden on filer to prove is an “exonerating dispo.” and that continued public access poses an unacceptable risk of harm;

Includes a proposed order to make GR 15/ Ishakawa compliance easy;

Includes a reasonable processing fee.

Page 18: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

SB 5019/ HB 1235 • Utilizes existing technology and procedures;• Includes legislative findings weighing the

public/private interests involved;• Places in own Chapter in Title 10, rather than RCW

10.97;• Clarifies that deferred prosecutions, NGRI, and

competency dismissals do not count;• Keeps nonconviction data available to courts,

prosecutors, law enforcement;• Includes a new section on dissemination of

protection orders.

Page 19: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

Consistent with GR 15;

State v. Ishikawa factors;

Access to Justice Technology Principles;

Board of Judicial Administration’s Resolution re: disparate impact;

Governor Locke’s Executive Order 00-33 re: Public Records Privacy Protections

Page 20: The Records Privacy Act of 2011 (SB 5019/HB 1235)

For more information contact:

Kim Gordon (206) 340-6034 [email protected]

Bob Cooper (206)852-3616 [email protected]