12
The Navajo Nation Background 1868 Treaty Right to Exclude – Williams v. Lee Education Frye Law Firm, P.C. http://www.fryelaw.us

The Navajo Nation

  • Upload
    matt

  • View
    41

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Navajo Nation. Background 1868 Treaty Right to Exclude – Williams v. Lee Education. Frye Law Firm, P.C. http://www.fryelaw.us. Congressional Treatment circa 1950. 1947 Appropriation Utah Land Exchange/Airport (1949) Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act (1950) 25 U.S.C. § 633 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Navajo Nation

The Navajo Nation

• Background• 1868 Treaty• Right to Exclude – Williams v. Lee• Education

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 2: The Navajo Nation

Congressional Treatment circa 1950

• 1947 Appropriation• Utah Land Exchange/Airport (1949)• Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act (1950)• 25 U.S.C. § 633• Subsequent amendments• Austin v. Andrus (1981)• NN v US (2009)

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 3: The Navajo Nation

1964 Civil Rights Act – Title VII

• “race, color, religion, sex, or national origin” discrimination

• Mundt amendment (“Indian preference programs now in operation or later to be instituted”)

• 1988 Guidance (per Thomas)• 638 amendment (1994)

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 4: The Navajo Nation

Early Navajo Nation Initiatives

• Tribal preference guidelines (1973)• Department of Labor position• U.S. Commission on Civil Rights position

(1975)• EEOC involvement (SRP settlement)

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 5: The Navajo Nation

DOI Leasing

• IMLA, Long-term Leasing Act, Rehabilitation Act

• Austin v. Andrus (1981)• S. Udall deposition

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://fryelaw.us

Page 6: The Navajo Nation

Judicial Backdrop

• Dawavendewa I (1998)• cert. denied

• Karuk (2001)• Dawavendewa II (2002)• cert. denied

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 7: The Navajo Nation

Peabody I (D. Ct.)

• Rule 19 dismissal – Navajo Nation absent

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 8: The Navajo Nation

Peabody II (9th Cir.)

• Reversal: EEOC join Navajo Nation if no affirmative relief sought against it• cert. denied

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 9: The Navajo Nation

Peabody III (D. Ct.)

• Rule 19 dismissal – EEOC indeed sought affirmative relief against Navajo Nation

• Rule 19 dismissal – Secretary of Interior absent• National trusteeship policies• Leasing Regulations• Consistent Practice

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 10: The Navajo Nation

Peabody IV (9th Cir.)

• Ignore EEOC’s pleadings• Secretary can be impleaded under Rule 14 • cert. denied

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 11: The Navajo Nation

Peabody V (D. Ct.)

• Peabody impleaded Secretary• Secretary’s position – consistent with

Solicitor General’s position

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us

Page 12: The Navajo Nation

Peabody VI (9th Cir.)

• Argued May 2014• Strong Federal brief

Frye Law Firm, P.C.http://www.fryelaw.us