49

The Framework for TeachingEvaluation Instrument

DOMAIN 3Instruction

Instruction

58

3c ENGAGING STUDENTS IN LEARNING 3c Engaging Students in Learning

Student engagement in learning is the centerpiece of the framework for teaching; all othercomponents contribute to it. When students are engaged in learning, they are not merely “busy,”nor are they only “on task.” Rather, they are intellectually active in learning important and chal-lenging content. The critical distinction between a classroom in which students are compliantand busy and one in which they are engaged is that in the latter students are developing theirunderstanding through what they do. That is, they are engaged in discussing, debating, answer-ing “what if?” questions, discovering patterns, and the like. They may be selecting their workfrom a range of (teacher-arranged) choices and making important contributions to the intellec-tual life of the class. Such activities don’t typically consume an entire lesson, but they areessential components of engagement.

A lesson in which students are engaged usually has a discernible structure: a beginning, amiddle, and an end, with scaffolding provided by the teacher or by the activities themselves.The teacher organizes student tasks to provide cognitive challenge and then encouragesstudents to reflect on what they have done and what they have learned. That is, the lesson hasclosure, in which students derive the important learning from their own actions. A critical ques-tion for an observer in determining the degree of student engagement is “What are the studentsbeing asked to do?” If the answer to that question is that they are filling in blanks on aworksheet or performing a rote procedure, they are unlikely to be cognitively engaged.

In observing a lesson it is essential not only to watch the teacher but also to pay close atten-tion to the students and what they are doing. The best evidence for student engagement is whatstudents are saying and doing as a consequence of what the teacher does, or has done, or hasplanned. Elements of component 3c : Activities and assignmentsThe activities and assignments are the centerpiece of student engagement, since theydetermine what it is that students are asked to do. Activities and assignments that promotelearning are aligned with the goals of the lesson, and require student thinking that both empha-sizes depth over breadth and that may allow students to exercise some choice.Grouping of studentsHow students are grouped for instruction is one of the many decisions teachers make everyday. There are many options: students of similar background and skill may be clusteredtogether, or the more advanced students may be spread around into the different groups. Alter-natively, a teacher might permit students to select their own groups or to form them randomly.Instructional materials and resourcesThe instructional materials a teacher selects to use in the classroom can have an enormousimpact on students’ experience. Although some teachers are obliged to use a school or district’sofficially sanctioned materials, many teacher use these selectively or supplement them with oth-ers of their choosing that are better suited to engaging students in deep learning—for example,the use of primary source materials in social studies.Structure and pacingNo one, whether adults or students, likes to be either bored or rushed in completing a task.Keeping things moving, within a well-defined structure, is one of the marks of an experiencedteacher. And since much of students’ learning results from their reflection on what they havedone, a well-designed lesson includes time for reflection and closure.Indicators:• Activities aligned with the goals of the lesson• Student enthusiasm, interest, thinking, problem-solving, etc.• Learning tasks that require high-level student thinking and are aligned with lesson objectives• Students highly motivated to work on all tasks and persistent even when the tasks are

challenging• Students actively “working,” rather than watching while their teacher “works”• Suitable pacing of the lesson: neither dragging nor rushed, with time for closure and student

reflection

59

3c Engaging Students in Learning—Possible Examples

Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient DistinguishedStudents are able tofill out the lessonworksheet withoutfully understandingwhat it’s asking themto do.

The lesson drags orfeels rushed.

Students complete“busy work” activities.

Students are asked tofill in a worksheet, fol-lowing an establishedprocedure.

There is a recogniza-ble beginning, middle,and end to the lesson.

Parts of the lessonhave a suitable pace;other parts drag orfeel rushed.

Students are asked toformulate a hypothe-sis about what mighthappen if the Ameri-can voting system al-lowed for the directelection of presidents.

Students are given atask to do independ-ently, then to discusswith a table group,and then to report outfrom each table.

There is a clear be-ginning, middle, andend to the lesson.

The lesson neitherrushes nor drags.

Students are asked towrite an essay “in thestyle of Hemingway.”

A student askswhether they mightremain in their smallgroups to completeanother section of theactivity, rather thanwork independently.

Students identify orcreate their ownlearning materials.

Students summarizetheir learning from thelesson.

60

3c ENGAGING STUDENTS IN LEARNING

Few students are intellectually engaged inthe lesson.

Learning tasks require only recall or have asingle correct response or method.

The materials used ask students to performonly rote tasks.

Only one type of instructional group is used(whole group, small groups) when varietywould better serve the instructionalpurpose.

Instructional materials used are unsuitableto the lesson and/or the students.

The lesson drags or is rushed.

Some students are intellectually engaged inthe lesson.

Learning tasks are a mix of those requiringthinking and recall.

Students are in large part passivelyengaged with the content, learning primarilyfacts or procedures.

Students have no choice in how they com-plete tasks.

The teacher uses different instructionalgroupings; these are partially successful inachieving the lesson objectives.

The materials and resources are partiallyaligned to the lesson objectives and only insome cases demand student thinking.

The pacing of the lesson is uneven—suitable in parts, but rushed or dragging inothers.

The learning tasks and activities, materials,resources, instructional groups andtechnology are poorly aligned with theinstructional outcomes or require only roteresponses.

The pace of the lesson is too slow or toorushed.

Few students are intellectually engaged orinterested.

The learning tasks and activities arepartially aligned with the instructional out-comes but require only minimal thinking bystudents, allowing most to be passive ormerely compliant.

The pacing of the lesson may not providestudents the time needed to be intellectu-ally engaged.

Critical Attributes

UNSATISFACTORY BASIC

61

Most students are intellectually engaged in thelesson.

Learning tasks have multiple correctresponses or approaches and/or demandhigher-order thinking.

Students have some choice in how they com-plete learning tasks.

There is a mix of different types of groupings,suitable to the lesson objectives.

Materials and resources support the learninggoals and require intellectual engagement, asappropriate.

The pacing of the lesson provides students thetime needed to be intellectually engaged.

In addition to the characteristics of “proficient”:

Virtually all students are highly engaged in thelesson.

Students take initiative to modify a learningtask to make it more meaningful or relevant totheir needs

Students suggest modifications to the groupingpatterns used.

Students have extensive choice in how theycomplete tasks.

Students suggest modifications or additions tothe materials being used.

Students have an opportunity for both reflec-tion and closure after the lesson to consolidatetheir understanding.

The learning tasks and activities are alignedwith the instructional outcomes and designedto challenge student thinking, the result beingthat most students display active intellectualengagement with important and challengingcontent and are supported in that engagementby teacher scaffolding.

The pacing of the lesson is appropriate, provid-ing most students the time needed to beintellectually engaged.

Virtually all students are intellectually engagedin challenging content through well-designedlearning tasks and suitable scaffolding by theteacher and fully aligned with the instructionaloutcomes.

In addition, there is evidence of some studentinitiation of inquiry and of student contributionto the exploration of important content.

The pacing of the lesson provides students thetime needed to intellectually engage with andreflect upon their learning and to consolidatetheir understanding.

Students may have some choice in how theycomplete tasks and may serve as resourcesfor one another.

PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Charlotte Danielson The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument© 2011 The Danielson Group