Hydrobiologia 186/187: 239-245, 1989.C. Ricci, T. W. Snell and C. E. King (eds), Rotifer Symposium V. 239 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgium.
Tasmania revisited: rotifer communities and habitat heterogeneity
R.J. Shiel', W. Koste2 & L.W. Tan3'Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, P.O. Box 921 Albury, N.S. W. 2640, Australia; 2LudwigBrill Strasse 5, Quakenbrack D-4570, Federal Republic of Germany; 3 Western Mining Corporation, P.O.Box 409 Unley, S.A. 5061, Australia
Key words: rotifers, Tasmania, dune lakes, endemism
The results of four field surveys for Rotifera in Tasmania are summarized. Most new species and recordsin a 1987 survey were from acid waters (pH < 4.0) of dune lakes on the west coast (42 S). Marked intra-and interhabitat differences in rotifer communities of lakes and ponds were demonstrated by clusteranalysis and related to habitat heterogeneity.
Our first survey of Tasmanian natural lakes on thecentral plateau (1980) provided 62 new rotiferrecords (one n. sp., Aspelta tilba). In 1984 thesurvey was extended to impoundments and arange of smaller ponds and stock dams, with 62further taxa (including n. spp. Lecane tasmanien-sis, Lepadella tyleri and Testudinella unicornuta)added to the known Rotifera (Koste & Shiel,1987a). In 1985, a third survey (100 sites, includ-ing all sites samples earlier), added 63 taxa(including Brachionus lyratus tasmaniensis, Cepha-lodella lindamaya, Lepadella tana and Testudinellamucronata tasmaniensis) (Koste & Shiel, 1986).
To provide seasonal information from the same100 localities, a fourth survey was made in spring1987, with the addition of eight new sites in aseries of dune lakes on the west coast of theisland. We had not investigated dune lakes previ-ously; work on the mainland (e.g. Timms, 1973)suggested that dune lakes were not productive ofRotifera. Indeed, in a review of these habitats,Timms (1986: 425) noted that rotifers seem to be
excluded by acidity; 'several taxa, including...rotifers... are rare or absent in acidic dune lakes'.Our attention was directed to these lakes by DrP.A. Tyler at the University of Tasmania, whohad sampled them for phytoplankton.
The 1987 survey resulted in 159 identified taxa,59 of these first records for the island (with Lecaneherzigi, Notommata tyleri, Trichotria buchneri andT. pseudocurta new) (Koste et al., 1988). Most ofthe new records came from the western plateauarea (Fig. 1). Some 250 taxa of Rotifera are nowknown from the island, and it is likely that only afraction of the rotifer fauna has been encountered.We summarize here the results of the four surveysto date, and discuss some of the peculiarities ofthe Tasmanian limnetic and littoral rotifer com-munities relative to those of the nearby mainland.
All sites described in the earlier reports wereresampled in 1987. Habitats ranged from shallowroadside pools, ponds, turbid stock dams, to large
Fig. 1. Tasmania, with nine lakes mentioned in text. Arrows indicate approximate locations of endemic species figured.
impoundments and natural lakes above 1000 mA. S.L. on the central plateau. A number of streamand river sites also were sampled. For con-venience, the sites are grouped here into (a) lakes,(b) ponds, and (c) streams, however the divisionis arbitrary in view of the range of habitats withineach category.
Species lists are provided in each of the surveyreports cited above, considerably extending theknown distribution of most taxa recorded. Newspecies apparently confined to Tasmania areshown in Fig. 1. Notably absent from Tasmania
are Brachionus species known from the mainland(28 taxa) (Koste & Shiel, 1987b). OnlyB. angularis was common in Tasmanian waters,with occasional occurrences of B. calyciflorus,B. quadridentatus and a local variant of B. lyratus(Fig. 1). The most abundant taxa in limneticassemblages were species of Keratella, with nineidentified and four (K. australis, K. cochlearis,K. procurva and K. slacki) widely distributed.Also abundant were species of Lecane (28 spp.),with four taxa common in the limnetic regions ofponds and stock dams (L. bulla, L.flexilis,L. hamata and L. lunaris), and an endemic(L. tasmaniensis) occurring widely in acid watersin the southwest. Trichocerca species (26) werewidespread, but only T. similis abundant.
Of 250 taxa recorded, 116 (48%) were foundonly once (or twice from the same locality in dif-ferent surveys). Such patchiness is generally inaccord with Australian mainland surveys (Shiel &Koste, 1986) and with studies reported elsewhere(Dumont, 1983). Approx. 20 % (49 spp.) have notbeen reported from the mainland; in most casesthese are acidophile species known previouslyfrom tropical regions of South America or SouthEast Asia, e.g. Testudinella ahlstromi, Trichocercabraziliensis (Koste, 1978). About half the recordedtaxa were of limited distribution (< 20 % of locali-ties). Only 10 species (4 %) occurred in > 20 % ofsamples (n = 267): K. slacki (38%), T. similis(35 %), K. cochlearis (32 %), K. australis/L. flexilis(30%), L. lunaris (28%), L. bulla (23%),B. angularis/Polyarthra vulgaris (21 %) and K. pro-curva (20 %).
Comparison of species distribution data fromthe Tasmanian series with those from a moreintensive sampling effort reported by Hillman(1986) from the R. Murray catchment on themainland suggests that the Tasmanian rotiferfauna is more diverse (Table 1), i.e. the R. Murraydata represent > 1500 samples from a300000 km2 area, the Tasmanian data 267samples from a 68000 km2 area. More speciesoccur in Tasmanian standing waters, with amarked decrease in streams possibly reflecting thesteeper gradients and greater turbulence atTasmanian sites. R. Murray gradients are gentler,
Table 1. Summary of rotifer recorded from Tasmanian andAustralian mainland habitats. Lakes includes artificialimpoundments; Ponds includes turbid stock dams.(R. Murray data after Hillman, 1986).
No. of species
Tasmania R. Murray(240) (229)
1. Lakes 148 1262. Ponds 189 174*3. Streams 50 734. Lakes and ponds 59 855. Lakes and streams 3 456. Ponds and streams 10 547. Lakes. ponds and streams 41 39
the flows slower, and a complex rotifer planktonis maintained.
A simple plot of species numbers againstsampling frequency (Fig. 2) suggests that morerotifer species await discovery in Tasmania. Typi-cally, such plots produce an asymptote asrepeated surveys produce fewer unknown taxa.Our sample series has not reached an asymptote,although first records have declined (90 %, 47 %,32%, 28% for respective surveys). Given that wehave collected from only 100 of > 4000 availablesites, it is conceivable that more rotifer taxa ulti-mately will be recorded from Tasmania than pres-ently are known from the mainland (about 600species).
1980 1984 1985 19871980 1984 1985 1987Fig. 2. Cumulative species numbers per sampling survey,
Using Sokal's (1961) distance measure to com-pare species assemblages (number of taxa andproportion of each) across all sites in all years, themost striking feature of the rotifer assemblageswas the marked dissimilarity in species com-position between habitats, even within the samehabitat category. The whole data set is too largeto reproduce here, however two smaller subsetsare used below as examples.
(a) LakesIn summary, over the four surveys, the naturallakes on the central plateau had the most diverse
rotifer assemblages, although not necessarily themost species. The rotifer assemblages (1987survey) of ten sites (mean no.spp. site- ' = 10.4;mean diversity (H') = 2.31) are compared byaverage linkage cluster analysis in Fig. 3a. Rela-tive proximity of the lakes is shown in Fig. 1.
Although communities of the ten lakes wereranked of low similarity (0-22% taxa shared) byJaccard coefficient run concurrently with Sokal'sniche distance, clustering grouped lakes in closeproximity, e.g. Great Lake and Arthur's Lake,both dominated by Polyarthra vulgaris, and shar-ing Gastropus minor and Filinia longiseta from 16and 10 species, respectively. Similarly, Plateau(16 spp.) and Augusta (11 spp.) were both domi-
Sokal's niche distanceFig. 3. Average linkage dendrograms (Sokal's niche distance) for (a) ten lake sites and (b) ten ponds/stock dams (indicated by
site #). 1987 survey.
nated by Synchaeta oblonga and shared Euchlanismeneta, Lepadella patella and Lecane flexilis.
Generally, the widely distributed taxa (K. coch-learis, P. vulgaris/dolichoptera, F. pejleri/longisetaand T. similis) comprised the shared species; theremaining taxa were specific to each lake. No twolakes had the same combination of temperature,pH and conductivity (within the range 7-14 C,pH 4.0-7.7, 9.0-33.0 t S cm - 1), suggesting otherdifferences in chemistry which may account inpart for the disparity of resident rotifer assem-blages by their influences on the algal and bac-terial communities.
Notably, a net tow from Lake Garcia, a dunelake first sampled in the 1987 survey (Fig. 1)(17.0 C, pH 4.3, 98.3 S cm- ) had 35 rotiferspecies, including 8 new records (3 n. spp., withone (Trichocerca) yet to be described) and thehighest diversity (H' = 4.37) yet recorded fromTasmania. The assemblage was a mixture of lim-netic and littoral taxa indicative of shalloweutrophic waters, including K. procurva (domi-nant), 5 spp. of Lecane and 8 of Trichocerca.
Seasonal changes in species compositionwithin each of the lakes were reflected in lowsimilarities between surveys, with only 1-3 of thecommon species present on successive visits. Inthe larger lakes, e.g. L. Pedder, there wereappreciable community differenc