17
SURROGATE DECISION MAKING AAOS ETHICS COMMITTEE Joan Krajca-Radcliffe, MD 1

SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

  • Upload
    rocco

  • View
    91

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SURROGATE DECISION MAKING. AAOS ETHICS COMMITTEE Joan Krajca-Radcliffe, MD. Objectives. Be familiar with the established levels of medical-legal surrogacy and the hierarchy within each level - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

AAOS ETHICS COMMITTEE

Joan Krajca-Radcliffe, MD

1

Page 2: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

• Be familiar with the established levels of medical-legal surrogacy and the hierarchy within each level

• Be aware of your state’s specific statutes regarding surrogate decision making, hierarchy, and limitations

• Be able to identify and utilize available resources to help in decision making and resolution of conflicts

Objectives

2

Page 3: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Case

The patient is a 40 year-old single male, stable, but in frail health due to multiple chronic medical conditions. Previously he had bilateral total shoulder replacements and is now hospitalized with infection in both shoulder joints.

3

Page 4: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Despite the recommendation of his orthopaedic surgeon, he refuses any type of surgical intervention, even after lengthy discussions regarding the risks and potential catastrophic consequences, including implant failure, sepsis, and death.

4

Page 5: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Medically-legally, can he dothis? What is the issue?

5

Page 6: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

After evaluation, the patient is deemed competent to make his own decisions. He is started on IV antibiotics. After continued discussions with his surgeon, he accepts only fluoroscopically-guided needle aspirations.

6

Page 7: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

He does quite well initially but, while on his course of IV antibiotics, the shoulder infections worsen. He becomes septic and is moved to the ICU. After continuing to refuse any surgical intervention, his condition deteriorates and he is no longer able to participate in his care or make competent decisions.

7

Page 8: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

He has no living will, advance directives, or durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOA). His twin sister, who has reluctantly accepted his decisions so far, is torn between honoring his wishes and trying to save his life. She is aware of his decision never to agree to surgery, having seen his struggles with his chronic medical conditions and previous difficult surgeries. She plans to honor his wishes.

8

Page 9: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Who is the legal decision maker?

9

Page 10: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Later that day, the patient's younger brother arrives in town and is horrified by his sister's decision. He has always looked up to his older brother as a role model and strongly advocates for the surgery recommended by his surgeon.

10

Page 11: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

What is the established hierarchy for surrogate decision makers?

11

Page 12: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

What if there is no living will, advance directives, durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOA), or available family members?

12

Page 13: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

What if the patient's preferences are known but are not in writing?

What if the patient has selected a surrogate informally, but legal documents are not completed?

What if the patient is married but estranged and not yet legally divorced?

13

Page 14: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

What if there is a designated surrogate, but his/her decision is inconsistent with the patient's known preferences or values?

What if there is a conflict of interest or seemingly ulterior motive of a surrogate or involved family member?

What if there are disagreements between surrogates?

14

Page 15: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

• When patients lose their decision- making capacity, it is imperative to ensure that health-care decisions are legally and ethically made on their behalf.

• Establishment of patient competency and surrogate decision making must be done appropriately.

• The physician must be familiar with his/her role in the process.

 

Summary

15

Page 16: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Code of Ethics and Professionalism for Orthopaedic Surgeons, I. F. Adopted October 1988, revised 2011.http://www.aaos.org/about/papers/ethics/code.asp

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Standards of Professionalism on Providing Musculoskeletal Services to Patients, Mandatory Standard 4. Adopted April 2005, amended April 2008.http://www3.aaos.org/member/profcomp/provmuscserv.pdf

Lo B: Resolving Ethical Dilemmas – A Guide for Clinicians, ed 4, Chapter 13. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkens, 2009.

References

16

Page 17: SURROGATE DECISION MAKING

Van Norman G: Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology: A Case-Based Textbook, Section 1, Chapter 4. Cambridge, Eng, Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 8.081. Chicago, IL, American Medical Association, ed 2010-2011.

17