Upload
doduong
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Summary of Technical Findings / Evaluation Results
Presented to :I-710 Corridor Advisory Committee
December 13, 2017
Key Technical Results Measures TAC CAC
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
March 2017
Key Technical Findings: TAC and CAC Committee Presentations
Benefits Costs Impacts
Dec. 2017
August 2017
Sept. 2017
Feb. 2017
March 2017
Dec. 2017
August 2017
Sept. 2017
Feb. 2017
2
Key Technical Results Measure TAC CAC
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Benefits Costs Impacts
Feb. 2017
Feb. 2017
Sept. 2017
Sept. 2017
April 2017
April 2017
March 2017
Feb. 2017
Feb. 2017
Sept. 2017
Sept. 2017
April 2017
April 2017
March 2017
Key Technical Findings: TAC and CAC Committee Presentations
3
Summary of Key Technical Findings
Compare the Two Build Alternatives:Alternative 5CAlternative 7
4
Key Technical Results Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
No
Best
No
NoYes
Best
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 5
Air Quality Results6
Air Quality Results7
I‐710
Freew
ayZE/NZE Trucks Only Address Tailpipe Emissions
Air Quality Results8
Greenhouse Gas Tailpipe Emissions
Air Quality Results9
Key Technical Results Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 10
Cost of ZE / NZE Trucks(in millions $’s)
Reduction in Diesel Particulate Matter(lbs, over the 8 year life of the vehicles)
Cost ‐Benefit($’s per lb. reduced)
Diesel Particulate Matteron I-710
11
Cost of ZE / NZE Trucks(in millions $’s)
Reduction in NOx(million lbs, over the 8 year life of the vehicles)
Cost ‐Benefit($’s per lb. reduced)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)Throughout the AOI
12
Key Technical Results Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
No
Best
No
NoYes
Best
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 13
Project Cost
I-710 Cost EstimatesCurrent Year Dollars (in Billions)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
Alt. 5C Alt. 7 Alt. 7‐ZE
$’s,
in B
illion
s
ProgrammaticFeatures
Freight Corridor
I‐710
14
Affordability
I-710 Cost EstimatesCurrent Year Dollars (in Billions)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
Alt. 5C Alt. 7 Alt. 7‐ZE
$’s,
in B
illion
s
ProgrammaticFeatures
Freight Corridor
I‐710
$1.179Billion
Total Amount of Funding that is Reasonably
Foreseeable
Note: Funding Scenarios developed by CH2M (Sept. 2017) to estimate funds available for highway construction through 2046/47. Funding for programmatic features such as near zero- and zero-emissions trucks would require supplementary, non-highway funding sources (i.e., air quality, clean energy funding sources).
15
Key Technical Results Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
NoYes
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 16
I-710 Cost EstimatesCurrent Year Dollars (in Billions)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
Alt. 7
$’s,
in B
illion
s
Finish I‐710
Build Freight Corridor
Minimum Build I‐710
Minimum Build I-710$ 5.26 Billion
Alternative 7 Constructability Dilemma
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
I-710 must be rebuilt first to make way for the Freight Corridor in
Alternative 7
17
I-710 Cost EstimatesCurrent Year Dollars (in Billions)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
Alt. 7
$’s,
in B
illion
s
Finish I‐710
Build Freight Corridor
Minimum Build I‐710
Alternative 7 Constructability Dilemma
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
$1.179Billion
Total Amount of Funding that is Reasonably
Foreseeable
Minimum Build I-710$ 5.26 Billion
Note: Funding Scenarios developed by CH2M (Sept. 2017) to estimate funds available for highway construction through 2046/47. Funding for programmatic features such as near zero- and zero-emissions trucks would require supplementary, non-highway funding sources (i.e., air quality, clean energy funding sources).
The Freight Corridor in Alternative 7 Cannot be Constructed and Utilized
18
Time
Phasing & UtilizationA
ltern
ativ
e 7
Ben
efits
Alte
rnat
ive
5CB
enef
its
Scenario: Funding & Phasing: $2 Billion per Decade
110%Relative
to 5C
2035 2045 20552025
$4B $6B$0 $2BConstruct Freight Corridor
Construct Freeway
Construct Freeway
100%Safety & Mobility
Benefits
$1.2B
ReasonablyForeseeable
Funding
10% of BenefitsRealized
20% of BenefitsRealized
50%Safety & Mobility
Benefits
19
Key Technical Results Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
No
Best
No
NoYes
Best
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 20
Right of Way Impacts
Acquisitions
Homes Businesses
Alt. 5C 109 158
Alt. 7 121 206
21
Relocations or Direct Impacts
Community Facilities and Parks
Alt. 5C Alt. 7Multi-Service CenterLong Beach
Compton Hunting & Fishing ClubCompton
Compton Homing Pigeon ClubCompton
Parque Dos Rios (Planned)South Gate
Salvation Army ShelterBell
Fire Station No. 4Vernon
* Alternative avoids impact to facility, but would require temporary construction easement at edge of property.
Avoids
Avoids
Avoids*
22
Key Technical Results Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 23
Vehicle Hours of Delay
I-710Study Area
Existing 83,500
Alt. 1 (No Build) 105,800
Difference 22,300% Change 26.7%
Alt. 1 (No Build) 105,800
Alternative 5C 102,400
Difference (3,400) % Change - 3.2%
Alt. 1 (No Build) 105,800
Alternative 7 99,400
Difference (6,400) % Change - 6.0%
Changes in Delay (Daily Hours of Delay)
Increase / Decrease in hours of Delay
I-710 Study AreaTravel Time Savings
24
25
PicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
Alt. 7PicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
Alt. 5CPicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
Alt. 1
I-710 General Purpose Lanes
Year 2035
Peak Hour LOS Results
Level of Service
LOS Dor Better
LOS E
LOS F
AM
Travel on I-710 Corridor (Northbound)
Alternative 5C Alternative 7Average Speed(mph)
TravelTime(min)
Average Speed(mph)
TravelTime(min)
AM Peak Hour 59 19.3 58 19.4
MD Peak Hour 59 19.4 57 19.8
PM Peak Hour 59 19.4 58 19.4
I-710 Freeway (Mixed Flow Traffic)Year 2035
End-to-End Travel Times and Average Speeds
26
Travel on I-710 (Northbound)
Alternative 7I‐710 Freeway
Alternative 7Freight Corridor
Average Speed(mph)
TravelTime(min)
Average Speed(mph)
TravelTime(min)
AM Peak Hour 58 19.4 62 18.0
MD Peak Hour 57 19.8 60 18.7
PM Peak Hour 58 19.4 63 18.0
Alternative 7 (Freeway vs. Freight Corridor Trip)Year 2035
End-to-End Travel Times and Average Speeds
XX.X Best Travel Time
27
Key Technical Results Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 28
Safety Evaluation - No Build Alternative
Alondra
I-405
SR-91
I-105
Olympic
North
Florence
LB Blvd Pico-Anaheim
RosecransImperial
PCH WillowDel Amo
Atlantic-Bandini WashingtonFirestone
I-5
SR-60
Safety Rating by Subarea
Good Poor Marginal
Severity of Operational Conflict Points Severity Rating (1 - 3)Severity Rating (4 - 5)Severity Rating (6 - 7)
Severity Rating (8)Severity Rating (9 - 10)Severity Rating (11 - 12)
Shoreline/7th
29
Alondra
I-405
SR-91
I-105
Olympic
North
Safety Evaluation - Alternative 5C
Florence
LB Blvd Pico-Anaheim
RosecransImperial
PCH WillowDel Amo
Atlantic-Bandini WashingtonFirestone
I-5
SR-60
Safety Rating by Subarea
Good Poor Marginal
Severity of Operational Conflict Points Severity Rating (1 - 3)Severity Rating (4 - 5)Severity Rating (6 - 7)
Severity Rating (8)Severity Rating (9 - 10)Severity Rating (11 - 12)
Shoreline/7th
30
Alondra
I-405
SR-91
I-105
Olympic
North
Safety Evaluation - Alternative 7
Florence
LB Blvd Pico-Anaheim
RosecransImperial
PCH WillowDel Amo
Atlantic-Bandini WashingtonFirestone
I-5
SR-60
Safety Rating by Subarea
Good Poor Marginal
Severity of Operational Conflict Points Severity Rating (1 - 3)Severity Rating (4 - 5)Severity Rating (6 - 7)
Severity Rating (8)Severity Rating (9 - 10)Severity Rating (11 - 12)
Shoreline/7th
31
32
I-710 General Purpose Lanes
AM Peak Hour
PicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
PicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
Alt 5CPicoAnaheim
PCH
Willow
Del Amo
Long Beach
Alondra
Rosecrans
Imperial
Firestone
Florence
Washington
Atlantic-Bandini
Slauson
3rd
91
Alt 7Alt 1
- 0%
- 5%
- 10%
- 15%
- 20%
- 25%
- 30%
- 100%
Truck Percentages
Best
Worst
Alternative 7 - Daily Truck Volumes
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
I-710 Freight Corridor
Alte
rnat
ive
7 D
aily
Tru
ck V
olum
es(I-
710
Cor
ridor
, bot
h di
rect
ions
, Yea
r 203
5)Under Alternative 7, about two-thirds of the trucks use the Freight
Corridor and about one-third of the trucks remain on I-710
33
Key Technical Results Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 34
Section 4(f) Impacts (De Minimis)
Alternative 5C(Seven Properties)
Alternative 7(Eight Properties)
• Parque dos Rios (temporary construction easement)
• Cesar E. Chavez Park & Drake/Chavez Greenbelt (incorporation of land and TCE)
• Bandini Park/Batres Community Center (aerial easement)
• LA River & Rio Hondo Trails (temporary occupancies)
• De Forest Market Street Basin (aerial easement and TCE)
• UP Railroad (incorporation of land)• Dale’s Donuts (incorporation of land)
• Cesar E. Chavez Park & Drake/Chavez Greenbelt (incorporation of land and TCE)
• Bandini Park/Batres Community Center (aerial easement)
• LA River & Rio Hondo Trails (temporary closures)
• Dominguez Gap Wetlands – West Basin (incorporation of land and TCE)
• De Forest Market Street Basin (aerial easement and TCE)
• UP Railroad (incorporation of land)• Boulder Dam/Los Angeles Transmission
lines (incorporation of land)• Dale’s Donuts (incorporation of land)
35
Section 4(f) Impacts (Non-De Minimis)
• Impacts to Section 4(f) properties under Alternative 5C:– Parque dos Rios (1.68
acres permanently incorporated)
36
Section 4(f) Impacts (Non-De Minimis)
• Impacts to Section 4(f) properties under Alternative 7:– Parque dos Rios (entire
8.6-acre park would be acquired due to limited functionality of parcel outside area of project footprint)
37
Alternative 5C is predicted to result in a lower AQ impact to EJ populations and sensitive receptors as compared to Alternative 7
Areas of increase in maximum annual PM10 impact
Areas of increase in maximum annual PM10 impact
Environmental Justice
Areas of increase in maximum 24-hour PM10 impact
Areas of increase in maximum 24-hour PM10 impact
Sensitive Receptors
Daycare
Healthcare
Nursing Home
School
Environmental Justice
Area exceeds County average for Poverty
Area exceeds County average for Minority Population
Alternative 5C Alternative 7
38
Key Technical Results Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 39
Visual Impacts
View from LARIO Trail, Looking Southwest at the I-710/SR-91 Interchange, in the City of Long Beach
Alternative 5C Alternative 7
40
Evaluation Factor Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
No
Best
No
NoYes
Best
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 41
Evaluation Factor Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 42
Public Review of I-710 RDEIR/SDEIS
43
Public Circulation
• July 21, 2017: Recirculated Draft Environmental Document released to public
• October 23, 2017: 90-day comment period closed
• Public Hearings:
− 8/23/17 Commerce− 8/26/17 Paramount− 8/31/17 Long Beach
• Community Briefings:− 10/18/17 East Los Angeles− 10/19/17 Long Beach
44
Summary of Public Comments
Key Issues & Concerns:• Preference for full zero emissions
technologies• Avoid right-of-way impacts (i.e.
residential relocations and impacts to Bell Shelter and Long Beach Multi-Service Center)
• Concerns about peak-hour parking restrictions on nearby streets
• Impacts during construction including ramp and street closures
• Need for more bike and pedestrian connections to LA River trail
• Environmental justice and air quality concerns for communities near I-710
• Need to include local hire provisions (in construction)
• Need to fully utilize freight rail and the Alameda Corridor
45
I-710 Zero- and Near Zero- Emissions Truck Program
46
The air quality benefits come from the Zero and Near Zero emissions trucks included in the alternatives, as well as cleaner port operations and regional/state regulations, not the freight corridor infrastructure.
Air Quality & Public Health
Cost of ZE / NZE Trucks(in millions $’s)
Reduction in Diesel Particulate Matter(lbs, over the 8 year life of the vehicles)
4,000ZE/NZE
18,350ZE/NZE
18,350ZE
4,000ZE/NZE
18,350ZE/NZE
18,350ZE
47
I-710 Capital Cost Estimate*
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Alt. 5C Alt. 7 Alt. 7‐ZE
$’s,
in M
illio
ns
ZE Truck Fueling / Power StationsZero- / Near Zero- Emissions Trucks
* Costs are Order of Magnitude Estimates Only. Final costs will be determined based upon funding availability.
$134Million
Total Amount of Funding that is Reasonably
Foreseeable by 2035
Note: Funding Scenarios developed in collaboration with SCAQMD, examining known and potential funding sources for ZE and NZE trucks through 2035 (i.e., air quality, clean energy funding sources).
Funding for I-710 ZE/NZE Trucks48
Compare NZE & ZE Truck Performance Conventional Diesel Truck
Near Zero Emissions Truck
Zero Emissions Truck
Diesel Particulate Matter* (DPM) (lb/10,000 miles) 0.12 0 0
Nitrogen Oxides* (NOX)(lb/10,000 miles) 38.7 3.9 0
Greenhouse Gases* (GHG)(MT CO2/10,000 miles) 15.1 15.1 0
Subsidy: per Truck** $ 0 $25,000 $65,775
Number of Trucks per $100 million of Funding Not Applicable 4,000 Trucks 1,520 Trucks
* Running Exhaust emission factors are based on EMFAC2014 for heavy-heavy duty trucks in Los Angeles County for calendar year 2035.
** Unit costs represent incremental, average costs of zero emissions trucks (battery electric, fuel cell vehicles) from I-710 Zero Emissions Truck Commercialization Study, assuming pre-2035 deployment (Calstart, 2013).
49
How Many ZE / NZE Trucks Can We Get?
AQ Benefits to the Community
AQ Benefits to the Community
The number of “clean emissions” trucks that can be delivered depends upon the option and, ultimately, on AQ / Clean Energy funding levels.
Pro
babl
e Fu
ndin
g Th
roug
h 20
35
Pro
babl
e Fu
ndin
g Th
roug
h 20
35
50
I-710 ZE/NZE Deployment Strategy
Maximize Number of “Clean Emissions” Trucks and Air Quality Benefits – Begin with mix of zero and near zero emissions trucks in the near term. – Transition to pure zero emissions trucks in the future years, as zero
emissions truck technologies become commercially available and as unit prices drop.
– Partner with SCAQMD, EPA, CARB to pursue grant funding outside of the project programmed funds to support health-benefit investments.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
Num
ber o
f ZE/
NZE
Tru
cks*
AQ Funding Levels (in millions)
Option 3 Maximize Deployment of ZE/NZE Trucks
AQ Benefits to the Community
Short Term Long Term
* Number of number of “clean emissions” trucks that can be delivered depends upon the option and, ultimately, on AQ / Clean Energy funding levels.
51
Design Options
52
Design Options
East Los Angeles Area:
• Summary of Public Comments:Most Oppose Design Options 3A/3B
• Key Trade-Offs:− ROW Impacts / Displacements− Visual Impacts− Loss of Access− Cost ($173 million)
versus− Mobility− Safety Benefits
East LA Residences Businesses
Alternative 5C 0 0
Alternative 7 0 0
Design Option 3A 19 6
Design Option 3B 19 6
Displacements: East LA
Eliminate Design Options 3A/3B from further consideration
Design Options 3A/3B
Finding:
53
Design Options
Long Beach Area:
• City of Long Beach supports Design Option 2A
• Key Trade-Offs:− Improved Access to downtown
Long Beachversus
− Added Cost ($120 million)− Adds Three (3) Business
Displacements Carry forward Design Option 1A into Alternative 5C Design
Design Option 2AVernon/Bell/Commerce Area:
• Key Trade-Offs:− Avoids One (1) Business
Displacement− Avoids impacts to Hobart Yard
Operations− Saves $35 million
Design Option 1A
Finding:
54
Questions
55
Major Milestone: Select Alternative
Comment Review Process Extended to October 23, 2017
56
Purpose & Need
TechnicalFeasibility
Affordability
PublicComments & Environ. Impacts
How is the Preferred Alternative Determined?
Pref. Alt.
Air Quality, Safety, Congestion Relief, Mobility Benefits, Travel Time Savings
Funding, Cost & Affordability
Constructability, Ability to Implement
or Constructin Phases,
Independent Utility
Air Quality & Health Risk,
Displacements, Visual, Section 4f, & Environmental
Justice
57
Evaluation Factor Measures Alternative 5C Alternative 7
1. Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter / Cancer Risk
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Least Amount of PM 2.5
Greenhouse Gases
2. Air Quality Cost Benefit
$ per lbs. Diesel Particulate Matter Reduced
$ per lbs. NOx Reduced
3. Cost / AffordabilityTotal Project Cost
Affordability
4. Constructability Can the Alternative be Phased and Utilized?
5. ROW Impacts
Residential Displacements
Business Displacements
Sensitive Facilities Displacements
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Best
Best
No
Best
No
NoYes
Best
Best
Best
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7
Benefits Costs Impacts 58
Evaluation Factor Measure Alternative 5C Alternative 7
6. Mobility Benefits Reduction in Vehicle Hours of Delay
7. Congestion Relief Improvement in I‐710 Level of Service (LOS)
8. Travel TimesI‐710 Auto / Trucks
Freight Corridor ‐ Trucks
9. Safety BenefitsRemoves Operational Conflicts
Separates Cars & Trucks
10. 4f ImpactsDe Minimus Impacts
Non‐De Minimus Impacts
11. EJ Impacts Least Adverse Effect to EJ Populations
12. Visual Impacts Fewest Visual Impacts
Compare Alternative 5C and Alternative 7, Continued
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Best
Same Same
Benefits Costs Impacts 59
I-710 ZE/NZE Deployment Strategy
Maximize Number of “Clean Emissions” Trucks and Air Quality Benefits – Begin with mix of zero and near zero emissions trucks in the near term. – Transition to pure zero emissions trucks in the future years, as zero
emissions truck technologies become commercially available and as unit prices drop.
– Partner with SCAQMD, EPA, CARB to pursue grant funding outside of the project programmed funds to support health-benefit investments.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700
Num
ber o
f ZE/
NZE
Tru
cks*
AQ Funding Levels (in millions)
Option 3 Maximize Deployment of ZE/NZE Trucks
AQ Benefits to the Community
Short Term Long Term
* Number of number of “clean emissions” trucks that can be delivered depends upon the option and, ultimately, on AQ / Clean Energy funding levels.
60
Preferred Alternative
• Include Project features that improve air quality and mobility within the I-710 Study Area:– Zero and Near Zero “Clean Emissions” Trucks– I-710 Community Health and Benefit Program– Intelligent Transportation Systems / Advanced
Technologies– I-710 Congestion Relief Program for intersections
and local arterials– Transit Improvements– Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities and Connections
61
Preferred Alternative
• Eliminate problematic project features and design options from further consideration:– Peak period parking restrictions on arterials– Design Options 3A and 3B in East LA
62
Next Steps
63
Winter 2018• Select Preferred Alternative for FEIR/FEIS • Coordinate with Air Agencies to:
− Refine and Enhance I-710 Zero and Near Zero Emissions Truck Program− Develop and Seek AQ Funding
• Initiate Work on FEIR/FEIS for Preferred AlternativeSpring 2018• Identify Initial Construction Stages for Roadway Improvements based on
Independent Utility, Benefits, Costs and Impacts • Define Integrated Packages (Roadway Improvements, Programmatic
Features) based on Funding AvailabilitySummer 2018• Finalize the Environmental ProcessWinter 2019• Release RFPs for Final Design of Early Action Projects
63