1
Colonic neoplasia: detection and quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation G Harewood, V Sharma, P de Garmo VOLUME 58, NO. 1, 2003 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 79 8. Computer Committee. Standard format and content of the endoscopic procedure report. Manchester (MA): American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; 1992. 9. Cohen SM,Wexner SD, Binderow SR, Nogueras JJ, Daniel N, Ehrenpreis ED, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic- blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689-96. 10. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inad- equate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-802. 11. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, Burton L, Geller AJ, MacMath T. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tol- erance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy prepara- tion. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218-23. 12. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy prepa- ration. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631-4. 13. Lieberman DA, De Garmo PL, Fleischer DE, Eisen GM, Helfand M. Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States. Gastroenterology 2000;118:619-24. 14. McCashland TM, Brand R, Lyden E, de Garmo P. Gender dif- ferences in colorectal polyps and tumors. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:882-6. 15. Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, Conell C, Finkler L, Ackerson L, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 1999;281:1611-7. 16. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997;336:8-12. 17. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1009-13. 18. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F, Bergman G. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346-52. Submission of ACCEPTED manuscript on diskette Gastrointestinal Endoscopy strongly encourages the submission of final manuscripts on disk. Although files created with WordPerfect are preferred, please send your final manuscript in any electronic format. On your disk, please indicate computer system (e.g., IBM, MacIntosh) and word processing software used (e.g.,WordPerfect 6.1). Please refer to complete Instructions to Authors in the most recent January or July issue of the Journal.

Submission of accepted manuscript on diskette

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Colonic neoplasia: detection and quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation G Harewood, V Sharma, P de Garmo

VOLUME 58, NO. 1, 2003 GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 79

8. Computer Committee. Standard format and content of theendoscopic procedure report. Manchester (MA): AmericanSociety for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; 1992.

9. Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR, Nogueras JJ, Daniel N,Ehrenpreis ED, et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansingmethods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689-96.

10. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H, Chalasani N. Predictors of inad-equate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol2001;96:1797-802.

11. Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR, Burton L, Geller AJ,MacMath T. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tol-erance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standardelectrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy prepara-tion. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218-23.

12. Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS, King PD. Prospective,randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution withpolyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy prepa-ration. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631-4.

13. Lieberman DA, De Garmo PL, Fleischer DE, Eisen GM,Helfand M. Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States.Gastroenterology 2000;118:619-24.

14. McCashland TM, Brand R, Lyden E, de Garmo P. Gender dif-ferences in colorectal polyps and tumors. Am J Gastroenterol2001;96:882-6.

15. Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, Conell C, Finkler L, AckersonL, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia withscreening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 1999;281:1611-7.

16. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF. Importance of adenomas 5mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. NEngl J Med 1997;336:8-12.

17. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM,MacCarty RL. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.Gastroenterology 1987;93:1009-13.

18. Aronchick CA, Lipshutz WH, Wright SH, Dufrayne F,Bergman G. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopicpreparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte andFleet Phospho-Soda. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:346-52.

Submission of ACCEPTED manuscript on diskette

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy strongly encourages the submission of final manuscripts ondisk. Although files created with WordPerfect are preferred, please send your finalmanuscript in any electronic format. On your disk, please indicate computer system(e.g., IBM, MacIntosh) and word processing software used (e.g., WordPerfect 6.1). Pleaserefer to complete Instructions to Authors in the most recent January or July issue ofthe Journal.