Study Cases Strategic Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    1/12

    Strategic ManagementStrategic ManagementStrategic ManagementStrategic Management

    Study casesStudy cases

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    2/12

    Capsule 1: The bold entrepreneurialstyle of Ted Turner

    Robert E.: Ted Turner is in the great tradition of the individualentrepreneur who had a dream and backed it with his money andhis sweet

    Ted Turner III president and chairman of TurnerBroadcasting System, Inc.

    Turner was not only a business man and entrepreneur, but als aflambuoyant character and a public figure;

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    3/12

    Building the TSB Enterprise 24 year-old in charge of his father advertising enterprise, company that

    had $6 million debts;

    Had an opportunity to sell it, but refused;

    He persuaded lenders to wait for a while;

    Sold off some assets to improve the company`s cash position, arranged forsome innovative financing, reworked contracts with customers, hired a

    sales force;

    By 1969 the dept was paid off;

    New growth perspectives: acquisition of 2 radio station in Chattanooga( TN, USA) 1970 acquisition of Channel 17; he applied strategic steps in order to

    get Atlanta TV viewers to watch Channel 17 instead of other channels: Convinced advertisers to buy time in Channel 17; Strengthened the signal of Channel 17; Broadcasting old movies and reruns of popular shows; Seized the opportunity to air 5 NBC network shows; Acquired rights to televise the Atlanta Braves major league baseball games

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    4/12

    Building the TSB Enterprise

    Acquisition of a UHF station, WRET-TV in Charlotte, North Carolina(personal funds); Conducted a series of televised Beg-a-thons, asking Charlotte viewers for

    financial support (over 36000 contributions were received, ranging from 25cents to $80);

    1975 - billboard advertising was spun off from Turner Communication andbecame Turner Advertising, with Ted Turner as majority stockholder;

    January 1976 - Turner Communication (TC) acquired the Braves club(baseball team of Atlanta);

    1977 the company acquired a 95% limited partnership interest in Hawks,Ltd. , owner of the Atlanta Hawks professional basketball team;

    Broadcasting live games of the Braves and Hawks on Channel 17;

    1978 T C acquired a limited partnership interest in Soccer, Ltd. , theowner of the Atlanta Chiefs professional soccer team;

    Also in 1978 the company sold its AM and FM stations on Chattanooga for$1.050.000 cash, realizing a pre-tax gain of $395.000;

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    5/12

    Building the TSB Enterprise In 1979 three important developments:

    The company launched plans for the Cable News Network(CNN), the first 24-hour all news programming network forcable television operators, to begin operations in June 1980;

    By the end of 1979 the company has invested $6.816.000, acquired

    and begun renovations of a headquarters facility, hired key personnel,and obtained purchase commitments to provide the programming;

    The Turner Communication Corporation became TurnerBroadcasting System, Inc.

    An agreement to sell WRET-TV in Charlotte to Westinghousefor $20 cash, plus the assumption by Westinghouse of thestation`s obligations for film programs;

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    6/12

    Building the TSB Enterprise In 1981 the business of Turner Broadcasting System

    (TSB) consisted of: The operations of WTBS-TV;

    The CNN, a 24-hour comprehensive news channel available toUSA cable television systems;

    100% ownership of the Atlanta Braves professional majorleague baseball team

    Equity interests in limited partnership operating the AtlantaHawks professional NBA basketball team and the AtlantaChiefs professional soccer team

    A management service contract (including all personnel) tooperate Turner`s outdoor advertising business, withoperations based in Atlanta and Chattanooga,TN.

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    7/12

    Ted Turner`s style of managing His approach to business and dealing with people was both

    colorful and controversial;

    Seldom he hesitated to say exactly what he thought;

    In 1981, during the baseball strike the rumor has it that heremarket that all players should be drowned and the reams

    restaffed from scratch;

    Writers and journalist appended him different labels, likeCaptain Outrageous, Terrible Ted, the Mouth of the South,honest, petulant, loud, profane, impulsive, egotistical, ruthless,money-grumbling, sincere and chauvinistic;

    He was described as having a strong sense of what to do andwhen to do it. Complementing his sense of direction and senseof timing was a knack for picking capable managers to workunder him. He delegated authority readily;

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    8/12

    Ted Turner`s style of managing As a general rule, he did not supervise them closely,

    preferring instead to let them to do their jobs, with aminimum interference from his side, as long as things wereprogressing satisfactorily;

    He had a positive thinking and greater innocence : it can`t bedone? Let`s find out if things were not so good, he wascapable of short temper tantrums;

    He had a trying to win conception, he liked to turn losersinto winner, in sports and in business;

    He didn`t look at himself as a win at all costs practioner: I don`t thing that winning is everythingBe kind and fair and

    make the world a better place to live, that`s importantPeoplewant leadership, somebody to rally around, and I want to be aleader.

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    9/12

    Capsule 2: Ted Turner and managing the totalenterprise: A short exercise of what general

    management is or is Not

    Exercise

    Understanding the job of a GM-an analogy: GM is like a football coach;

    He is both coach and player both managing through peopleand achieving results alone;

    There is a balance that need to be established betweenplaying and coaching/doing and managing: the larger and morediversified the organization is being managed, the greaterthe proportion of time spend on managing (achievingorganizational results through the activities of others)rather than doing (achieving organizational results throughone`s own personal actions)

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    10/12

    Capsule 3: How to tell a good onefrom a bad one

    Objectives need to meet five specifications: An objective should relate to a single, specific topic (itshould not be abstract);

    An objective should relate to a result, not to an activity to

    be performed;

    An objective should be measurable;

    An objective should contain a time deadline for its

    achievements;

    An objective should be challenging but achievable.

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    11/12

    How to tell a good one from abad one

    Poor objectives, avoid them: Our objective is to maximize profits (not measurable, no

    deadline);

    Our objective is to increase sales revenue and unit volume (notmeasurable,2 topics, no deadline indicated);

    Our objective in 1984 is to boost advertising expenditures by15% (is not an objective, is an action);

    Our objective is to be a pioneer in research and developmentand to be the technological leader in the industry (overlyambitious, too many topics, not very clear);

    Our objective is to be the most profitable company in ourindustry (not specific enough, challenging - but may not beachievable).

  • 8/6/2019 Study Cases Strategic Management

    12/12

    Capsule 4: The alternatives to Managing withObjectives

    Managing by Extrapolation (MBE) relies upon the principle if it ain`t

    broke, don`t fix it; the future will take care of itself and things willwork out alright;

    Managing by Crisis (MBC) based upon the belief that the forte of anyreal good manager is solving problems; MBC is a form of reacting, ratherthan acting and of letting events dictate the whats and whens ofmanagement decisions;

    Managing by Subjectives (MBS) this approach emerges in the absence ofany organizationwide consensus or clear-cut directives on which way tohead what to do about the company`s issues and problems; do your ownthing the best way you know how; the mystery approach, objectivesand plans to achieve them are never clearly articulated by seniormanagement;

    Managing by Hope (MBH) decisions are taken on the hope that they willwork out and that good times are just around the corner; solid analysisand results-oriented action plans are absent;

    All of the types presented above represent muddling-through types ofapproaches ways of Managing by Wandering Around (MBWA). It is

    doubtful that those kind of approaches can lead to performance.