Upload
sarah-burstein
View
243
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 1/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLPChristopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698
E-mail: [email protected] Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: [email protected] Hung Q. Pham, SBN: 276613
E-mail: [email protected]
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326Woodland Hills, California 91367Telephone: (818) 888-7540Facsimile: (818) 888-7544
Attorneys for PlaintiffSPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba
SPECK PRODUCTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN,LLC, dba SPECK PRODUCTS, aCalifornia Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PATRICK MATTSON, an Individual;STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES,LLC, a Texas Limited LiabilityCompany; MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, a
business entity of unknown status; and
DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants
Case No.:
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND DECLARATORY RELIEF:
(1) FEDERAL TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT [15 U.S.C. §
1114/ Lanham Act § 43(a)]
(2) FALSE DESIGNATION OF
ORIGIN/UNFAIR
COMPETITION/FALSE OR
MISLEADING ADVERTISING
[15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)];
(3)
TRADEMARK DILUTION [15U.S.C . § 1125(c)];
(4) UNFAIR BUSINESS
PRACTICES [CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS
CODE § 17200];
(5) FEDERAL COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT [17 U.S.C. §
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 2/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
501(a)];
(6) COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT
INFRINGEMENT
[CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE §
980 ET SEQ., AND
CALIFORNIA COMMONLAW]
(7) FEDERAL DESIGN PATENT
INFRINGEMENT [35 U.S.C. §
271]
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
COMES NOW, Plaintiff SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba
SPECK PRODUCTS (hereinafter “Plaintiff” and/or “SPECK”), hereby alleges as
follows:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff, is now, and was at the time of the filing of this Complaint,
and at all intervening times, a California Limited Liability Company, duly
authorized and licensed to conduct business in the State of California, with its
principal place of business located in San Mateo, California.
2. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant PATRICK
MATTSON (“Defendant MATTSON”), is now and was at the time of the filing of
this Complaint, an individual doing business in McKinney, Texas. Plaintiff
further alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant MATTSON is the owner
and operator of STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, and the business ofunknown status MD5 TECHNOLOGIES.
3. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant STU
DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC (“Defendant STU”), is now and was at the
time of the filing of this Complaint, a Texas Limited Liability Company owned by
Defendant MATTSON, doing business at the address of 194 Industrial Boulevard,
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 2 of 23 Page ID #:2
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 3/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Suite 102, McKinney, Texas.
4. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that Defendant MD5
TECHNOLOGIES (“Defendant MD5,” collectively “Defendants”), is now and
was at the time of the filing of this Complaint, a business entity of unknown statusthat is a subsidiary of Defendant STU and is also owned by Defendant
MATTSON, doing business at the address of 194 Industrial Boulevard, Suite 102,
McKinney, Texas.
5. Defendants conduct business in the jurisdiction of the United States
District Court for the Central District of California by offering counterfeits goods
for sale in Los Angeles, California, that infringes on Plaintiff’s registered
trademarks, copyright, and patent.
6. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate,
associate or otherwise, of Defendants herein named as DOES 1-10, inclusive, are
unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious
names. When the true names and capacities of said Defendants have been
ascertained, Plaintiff will amend this pleading accordingly.
7.
Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants, and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
sued herein by fictitious names are jointly, severally and concurrently liable and
responsible with the named Defendant upon the causes of action hereinafter set
forth.
8. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times
mentioned herein Defendants, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, and each of them, were
the agents, servants and employees of every other Defendant and the acts of eachdefendant, as alleged herein, were performed within the course and scope of that
agency, service or employment.
JURISDICTION/VENUE
9. This Court has Federal subject matter jurisdiction over this matter
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b), in that the case arises out of
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 3 of 23 Page ID #:3
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 4/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition
and dilution under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.), and copyright
infringement under the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 501(a)); and this Court has
supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1367(a) and 1338 (a)(b).10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants since
Defendants have committed the tortious and illegal activities of trademark
infringement, copyright infringement, patent infringement, and unfair competition
in this district and/or Defendants have sufficient minimum contacts with this
district such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants by this Court does
not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. Among other
things, Defendants have advertised, offered to sell and have sold products that
infringe the trademarks of Plaintiff to consumers within this judicial district.
Defendants have also offered to sell and actually sold counterfeit products
(described more fully below) using an interactive internet website and knowing or
having reason to know that consumers throughout the United States, including
within this judicial district, would purchase said counterfeit goods from
Defendants, believing that they were authentic goods manufactured and
distributed by Plaintiff or its authorized manufacturers.
11. Additionally, supplemental jurisdiction exists over Defendants
because, on information and belief, Defendants conduct business in California and
in this judicial district, have purposefully directed action to California and this
district, or have otherwise availed themselves of the privileges and protections of
the laws of the State of California, such that this Court’s assertion of jurisdictionover Defendants does not offend traditional notions of fair play and due process.
12. Venue is proper, inter alia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because
on information and belief, a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise
to the claim occurred in this judicial district, and has caused damages to Plaintiff
in this district. The counterfeit Speck®-branded products were purchased from
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 4 of 23 Page ID #:4
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 5/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
California and Defendants purposefully shipped these counterfeit products into
California. Defendants’ actions within this district directly interfere with and
damage Plaintiff’s commercial efforts and endeavors and harms Plaintiff’s
goodwill within this venue. Additionally, Plaintiff conducts a substantial businesswithin this venue.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff and its Famous Speck®-Branded Products
13. Plaintiff is a privately held U.S. corporation founded in Palo Alto
California in 2001 as a form fit cellular telephone case company. Plaintiff creates
cases for the mobile accessories market.
14.
Plaintiff is one of the leading companies in their industry and has
gained numerous awards and recognition for its innovative products and designs.
15. Plaintiff is one of the world’s leading manufacturers of protective
carrying cases for electronic devices, including but not limited to, portable
electronic listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and for
portable computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular
telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants.
16. Plaintiff develops and manufactures protective carrying cases for
products such as the Apple iPhone®, Apple iPad®, Apple iPod®, Apple
MacBook®, Notebook bags and sleeves, Smartphones including Blackberry®,
HTC®, Sharp®, Samsung®, and Motorola® models, TomTom® GPS navigation
devices, portable hard drives such as WD My Passport Elite/Essential®, and the
Kindle 3®.17. Plaintiff is continually striving to discover and develop new,
advanced technologies and designs to meet the needs of the ever-advancing
consumer electronics industry. Plaintiff offers over 250 products and is sold in
over 75 countries worldwide.
/ / /
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 5 of 23 Page ID #:5
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 6/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
18. Plaintiff has spent substantial time, money and effort in developing
consumer recognition and awareness of its marks. Through the extensive use of
the Plaintiff’s marks, Plaintiff has built up and developed significant goodwill in
its entire product line. A wide array of newspapers, magazines and televisionnetworks has included advertising of Plaintiff’s products, which are immediately
identified by Plaintiff’s marks.
19. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of federally-registered and Common
law trademarks. The following is a partial (non-exhaustive) list of the registered
trademarks owned by Plaintiff:
A. SPECK, registered trademark number 3,663,010, registered on
August 4, 2009, for use on or in connection with protective carrying cases for
portable electronic listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and
for portable computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and
cellular telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants, in
Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);
B. [Design Mark], registered trademark number 3,666,082,
registered on August 11, 2009, consisting of an asterisk between parentheses
followed by the word “SPECK” in stylized letters; for use on or in connection
with protective carrying cases for portable electronic listening devices and music
players, namely, mp3 players, and for portable computers, global positioning
systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular telephones, portable media players,
and personal digital assistants, in Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);
C.
[Design Mark], registered trademark number 3,666,072,registered on August 11, 2009, consisting of an asterisk between parentheses; for
use on or in connection with protective carrying cases for portable electronic
listening devices and music players, namely, mp3 players, and for portable
computers, global positioning systems (GPS devices), mobile and cellular
telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants, in Class 9 (U.S.
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 6 of 23 Page ID #:6
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 7/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);
D. CANDYSHELL, registered trademark number 3,817,709,
registered on July 13, 2010, for use on or in connection with protective carrying
cases for mp3 players, mobile and cellular telephones, portable media players, and personal digital assistants in Class 9 (U.S. CLS. 21, 23, 26, 36 and 38);
Attached hereto as Exhibits A-D are true and correct copies of the
certificates of registration for each of the Marks that are federally-registered
(hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Marks”).
20. Plaintiff is also the owner of several international trademarks in the
following locations: Canada, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Malaysia,
European Community, Hong Kong, Int’l Registration – Madrid Protocol, Taiwan,
Australia, Singapore, Japan, Russian Federation, Thailand, and the People’s
Republic of China.
21. Plaintiff is also the exclusive owner of federally-registered and
common law copyrights related to and used in connection with the distribution of
its SPECK®–branded products, with the following (non-exhaustive) copyright
names, registration numbers, and registration dates: (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s
Copyright”)
A. “Fitted Arts Projekt iPhone 3 Core,” VA1778313 (Registered
May 27, 2011);
B. “PixelSkin iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1778433 (Registered May 27,
2011);
C.
“GeoMetric iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1778429 (Registered May 272011);
D. “Fitted iPhone 4 Core,” VA 1778411 (Registered May 27,
2011);
E. “Fitted iPhone 3 Core,” VA1778403 (Registered June 3, 2011)
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 7 of 23 Page ID #:7
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 8/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
F. “ToughSkin iPhone 3 Core,” VA1778414 (Registered June 3,
2011);
G. “SeeThru iPhone 3 Core,” VA1778421 (Registered June 3,
2011);H. “CandyShell iPhone 3 Core,” VA1778406 (Registered June 3,
2011);
I. “SeeThru Satin iPhone 4 Core,” VA1778423 (Registered June
3, 2011);
J. “SeeThru Satin iPhone 3 Core,” VA1791177 (Registered May
27, 2011);
K.
“SeeThru iPhone 4 Core,” VA1778418 (Registered June 3,
2011);
L. “Fitted Burton iPhone 4,” VA1778646 (Registered June 3,
2011);
M. “Fitted iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1778642 (Registered June 3,
2011);
N.
“ToughSkin iPhone 4 Core,” VA1791169 (Registered May 27,
2011);
O. “PixelSkin iPhone 4 Core,” VA1791185 (Registered May 27,
2011);
P. “Fitted Flex iPhone 4 Core,” VA1791188 (Registered May 27,
2011);
Q.
“SeeThru Satin iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1791189 (RegisteredMay 27, 2011);
R. CANDYSHELL FOR iPHONE 4,” VA1772394 (Registered
May 6, 2011);
S. “Fitted Flex iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1791186 (Registered May 27
2011);
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 8 of 23 Page ID #:8
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 9/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
T. “ToughSkin iPhone 4 Apple,” VA1791180 (Registered May
27, 2011);
U. “GeoMetric iPhone 4 Core,” VA1791182 (Registered May 27,
2011);V. “ToughShell iPhone 4 Core,” VA1791178 (Registered May 27
2011);
W. “iPhone 5 ShieldView Envelope,” VA1879078 (Registered
November 20, 2012);
X. iPhone 5 GemShell Core 2 Wedge 2- Cardstock,” VA1879027
(Registered November 20, 2012);
Y.
iPhone 5 CandyShell Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,” VA1879028
(Registered November 20, 2012);
Z. iPhone 5 SmartFlex CARD Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,”
VA1879029 (Registered November 20, 2012);
AA. iPhone 5 CandyShell FLIP Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,”
VA1879012 (Registered November 20, 2012);
BB.
iPhone 5 CandyShell GRIP Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,”
VA1879031 (Registered November 20, 2012);
CC. iPhone 5 CandyShell SATIN Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,”
VA1879076 (Registered November 20, 2012);
DD. iPhone 5 SmartFlex View Core2 Wedge2- Cardstock,”
VA1879010 (Registered November 20, 2012);
EE.
iPhone 5 FabShell Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,” VA1879074(Registered November 20, 2012);
FF. iPhone 5 PixelSkin Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,” VA1879056
(Registered November 20, 2012);
GG. iPhone 5 PixelSkin HD Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,”
VA1879051 (Registered November 20, 2012);
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 9 of 23 Page ID #:9
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 10/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
HH. iPhone 5 FabShell Burton Core2 Wedge2 - Cardstock,”
VA1879040 (Registered November 20, 2012);
II. iPhone 5 CandyShell Apple Packaging Milk Carton,”
VA1879009 (Registered November 20, 2012);JJ. iPhone 5 GemShell Apple Packaging Milk Carton,”
VA1879038 (Registered November 20, 2012);
KK. iPhone 5 CandyShell Card Apple Packaging Milk Carton,”
VA1879036 (Registered November 20, 2012);
LL. iPhone 5 ToughSkin Apple 2 Carton- Cardstock,” VA1879035
(Registered November 20, 2012);
MM.
iPhone 5 SmartFlex Apple Packaging Milk Carton,”
VA1879034 (Registered November 20, 2012); and
NN. iPhone 5 SmartFlex Shine Apple Packaging Milk Carton,”
VA1879013 (Registered November 20, 2012);
22. Additionally, Plaintiff owns a valid and lawfully issued United States
Design Patent, patent no. US 8,204,561 B2, for its “one piece co-formed exterior
hard shell case with an elastomeric liner for mobile electronic devices” (“Design
Patent”). Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the
registration certificate and design drawing.
Defendants’ Wrongful and Infringing Conduct
23. Defendants use, amongst other things, the Internet auction website
known as www.ebay.com (“eBay”) to sell and distribute products, including
counterfeit hard goods bearing Plaintiff’s Marks, Copyrights, and Design Patentdescribed above, to consumers. At any given time, there are millions of items
listed on eBay.com for purchase by its more than 200 million registered users.
24. Beginning on a date that is currently unknown to Plaintiff and
continuing to the present, Defendants have, without the consent of Plaintiff,
offered to sell and sold within the United States (including within this judicial
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 10 of 23 Page ID #:10
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 11/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
district) goods that were neither made by Plaintiff nor by a manufacturer
authorized by Plaintiff (such goods are hereafter referred to as “Counterfeit
Good(s)”) using reproductions, counterfeits, copies and/or colorable imitations of
one or more of the subject Marks, Federally-Registered Copyrights, Common-Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent. On information and belief, Plaintiff
further alleges that Defendants imported said Counterfeit Goods into the United
States, or encouraged others to import said Counterfeit Goods into the United
States, for the purpose of reselling the Counterfeit Goods in the United States.
25. Defendants own and operate web stores on eBay using the seller IDs
“drsmartphonesgroup” and “md5technologies.” Through these web stores,
Defendants regularly and systematically advertised, marketed, distributed and sold
products bearing unauthorized Speck registered trademarks.
26. On or about January 29, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a purported
“IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL WHITE / BLUE COLOR. NEW, USA
SELLER” (Item #300852917445) from Defendants’ eBay seller ID
“drsmartphonesgroup,” for a cost of $13.53, shipping inclusive, charged to the
PayPal electronic payment account of Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s PayPal electronic
payment receipt clearly identifies Plaintiff’s payment was made to “STU
Distribution Services” (Defendant STU), with a Customer Service URL of
“http://www.md5tech.com” (Defendant MD5), and PayPal ID
“[email protected].” The Counterfeit Good was shipped into Los
Angeles, California within this Court’s jurisdiction and was received with
shipping label identifying the seller as “Patrick Mattson” (Defendant MATTSON)in the return address. A true and correct copy of the PayPal electronic payment
receipt is attached hereto as Exhibit F. A true and correct copy of the shipping
label identifying the seller Defendant MATTSON in the return address is attached
hereto as Exhibit G.
/ / /
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 11 of 23 Page ID #:11
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 12/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
27. The purported “IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL WHITE / BLUE
COLOR. NEW, USA SELLER” (Item #300852917445) purchased from
Defendants was inspected by Plaintiff to determine authenticity. Plaintiff’s
inspection of the purchased item using security measures confirmed that the itemDefendants sold to Plaintiff was in fact a counterfeit Speck®-branded product.
28. On or about January 29, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a purported
“IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL DEEP VIOLET / AQUA COLOR. NEW,
USA SELLER” (Item #271164615042) from Defendants’ eBay seller ID
“md5technologies,” for a cost of $18.75, shipping inclusive, charged to the PayPal
electronic payment account of Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s PayPal electronic payment
receipt clearly identifies Plaintiff’s payment was made to “STU Distribution
Services” (Defendant STU), with a Customer Service URL of
“http://www.md5tech.com” (Defendant MD5), and PayPal ID
“[email protected].” The Counterfeit Good was shipped into Los
Angeles, California within this Court’s jurisdiction and was received with
shipping label identifying the seller as “MD5 TECHNOLOGIES” (Defendant
MD5) in the return address. A true and correct copy of the PayPal electronic
payment receipt is attached hereto as Exhibit H. A true and correct copy of the
shipping label identifying the seller Defendant MD5 in the return address is
attached hereto as Exhibit I.
29. The purported “IPHONE 5 SPECK CANDYSHELL DEEP VIOLET
/ AQUA COLOR. NEW, USA SELLER” (Item #271164615042) purchased from
Defendants was inspected by Plaintiff to determine authenticity. Plaintiff’sinspection of the purchased item using security measures confirmed that the item
Defendants sold to Plaintiff was in fact a counterfeit Speck®-branded product.
30. Defendants intentionally and knowingly accepted Plaintiff’s money
from a financial institution located in the State of California.
/ / /
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 12 of 23 Page ID #:12
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 13/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
31. Defendants also intentionally and knowingly delivered the
counterfeit products into the State of California.
32. Through such business activities, Defendants purposely derived
benefit from their interstate commerce activities by expressly targetingforeseeable purchasers in the State of California. But for Defendants’ advertising,
soliciting and selling of counterfeit Speck®-branded products, Plaintiff would not
have been able to make a purchase of the subject products.
33. Defendants use images and names confusingly similar or identical to
Plaintiff’s Marks to confuse consumers and aid in the promotion and sales of its
unauthorized and counterfeit product. Defendants’ use of Plaintiff’s Marks,
Copyright, and Design Patent include importing, advertising, displaying,
distributing, selling and/or offering to sell Counterfeit Goods.
34. Defendants’ use began long after Plaintiff’s adoption and use of its
trademarks, and after Plaintiff obtained the trademark and copyright registrations
alleged above. Neither Plaintiff nor any authorized agents have consented to
Defendants’ use of Plaintiff’s Marks, Federally-Registered Copyrights, Common-
Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent.
35. Defendants’ actions have confused and deceived, or threatened to
confuse and deceive, the consuming public concerning the source and sponsorship
of the counterfeit Speck products sold and distributed by Defendants. By their
wrongful conduct, Defendants have traded upon and diminished Plaintiff’s
goodwill. Furthermore, the sale and distribution of Counterfeit Goods by
Defendants have infringed upon Plaintiff’s Marks, Federally-RegisteredCopyrights, Common-Law Copyrights, and/or Design Patent.
36. Defendants’ offering to sell, selling, importing and encouraging
others to import Counterfeit Goods in this manner was and is likely to cause
confusion or to cause mistake and/or to deceive consumers who purchase the
Counterfeit Goods. Defendants also offered to sell, sold, imported, and/or
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 13 of 23 Page ID #:13
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 14/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 15/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 16/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
46. Defendants’ acts of violating, directly and/or contributorily, Section
1125 have caused, and will continue to cause, Plaintiff irreparable harm unless
they are enjoined by this Court.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Trademark Dilution Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant
STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5
TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)
[15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)]
47. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other
allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as though fully set forth in this
cause of action.
48. Plaintiff’s Marks are distinctive and famous within the meaning of
the Lanham Act .
49. Upon information and belief, Defendants’ unlawful actions began
long after Plaintiff’s Marks became famous, and Defendants acted knowingly,
deliberately and willfully with the intent to trade on Plaintiff’s reputation and to
dilute Plaintiff’s Marks. Defendants’ conduct is willful, wanton and egregious.
50. Defendants’ intentional sale of fake, pirated and counterfeit items
bearing Plaintiff’s Marks is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive,
mislead, betray, and defraud consumers to believe that the substandard imitations
are genuine products manufactured by Plaintiff. The actions of Defendants
complained of herein have diluted and will continue to dilute Plaintiff’s Marks,
and are likely to impair the distinctiveness, strength and value of Plaintiff’sMarks, and injure the business reputation of Plaintiff and its marks.
51. Defendants’ acts have caused and will continue to cause Plaintiff
irreparable harm. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law to compensate it fully
for the damages that have been caused and which will continue to be caused by
Defendants’ unlawful acts, unless they are enjoined by this Court.
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 16 of 23 Page ID #:16
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 17/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
52. As the acts alleged herein constitute a willful violation of section
43(c) of the Lanham Act , 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive
relief as well as monetary damages and other remedies provided by 15 U.S.C. §§
1116, 1117, 1118, and 1125(c), including Defendants’ profits, treble damages,reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and prejudgment interest.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Unfair Competition Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant
STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5
TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)
California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq.
53.
Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other
allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this
cause of action.
54. Defendants’ actions described herein constitute unlawful, unfair
and/or fraudulent business acts or practices. Defendants’ actions thus constitute
“unfair competition” pursuant to California Business & Professions Code §
17200.
55. As a proximate result of Defendants’ actions, Plaintiff has suffered
an injury in fact, including without limitation, damages in an amount to be proven
at trial, loss of money or property, and diminution in the value of its trademarks.
Plaintiff therefore has standing to assert this claim pursuant to California Business
& Professions Code § 17204.
56.
Defendants’ actions have caused, and will continue to cause Plaintiffto suffer irreparable harm unless enjoined by this Court pursuant to California
Business & Professions Code § 17203. In addition, Plaintiff requests that the
Court order that Defendants disgorges all profits wrongfully obtained as a result of
Defendant’s unfair competition, and order that defendant pay restitution to
Plaintiff in an amount to be proven at trial.
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 17 of 23 Page ID #:17
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 18/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Federal Copyright Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON,
Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5
TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)
[17 U.S.C. § 501(a)]
57. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other
allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this
cause of action.
58. Plaintiff is the exclusive owner of copyrights in and related to its
Speck®–branded products packaging, having numerous applications relating to
the same pending with the United States Copyright Office and possessing
copyright registrations with the United States Copyright Office.
59. Defendants did not seek and failed to obtain Plaintiff’s consent or
authorization to utilize, manufacture, reproduce, copy, display, prepare derivative
works, distribute, sell, transfer, rent, perform, and/or market Plaintiff’s copyright-
protected materials.
60.
Without permission, Defendants intentionally and knowingly
reproduced, counterfeited, copied, displayed, and/or manufactured Plaintiff’s
protected works by offering, advertising, promoting, retailing, selling, and
distributing counterfeit Speck-branded products contained within product
packaging which is at a minimum substantially similar to Plaintiff’s copyright
protected product packaging.
61.
Defendants’ acts as alleged herein, constitute infringement ofPlaintiff’s copyright, including Plaintiff’s exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute
and/or sell such protected material.
62. Defendants’ knowing and intentional copyright infringement as
alleged herein has caused and will continue to cause substantial and irreparable
harm to Plaintiff and has and will continue to cause damage to Plaintiff. Plaintiff
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 18 of 23 Page ID #:18
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 19/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
is therefore entitled to injunctive relief, damages, Defendants’ profits, increased
damages, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Common Law Copyright Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK
MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant
MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)
[California Civil Code §980 et seq., and California Common Law]
63. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other
allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as thought fully set forth in this
cause of action.
64.
At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff has held and still holds the
exclusive rights under California law and common law to reproduce, distribute, or
license the reproduction and distribution of the artwork, design, pictures,
representation, model and patterns protected by Plaintiff’s Common-Law
Copyrights in any and all formats and mediums, throughout the United States.
65. The artwork, design, pictures, representation, model and pattern of
protected by Plaintiff’s Common-Law Copyrights are original works in tangible
form which have been widely disseminated and published since at least in or
about September 2001.
66. The conduct herein complained of was extreme, outrageous,
fraudulent, and was inflicted on Plaintiff in reckless disregard of Plaintiff’s
rights. Defendants’ acts have irreparably harmed and continue to harm Plaintiff’s
exclusive proprietary rights and constitute common law copyright infringementand unfair competition. Defendants’ outrageous conduct supports an award of
exemplary and punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and make an
example of Defendants and to deter them from similar conduct in the future.
67. Each infringing transfer, duplication, sale, rental, distribution, display
and other exploitation of the artwork, design, pictures, representation, model and
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 19 of 23 Page ID #:19
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 20/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
patterns protected by Plaintiff’s Common-Law Copyrights constitutes a separate
claim against Defendants under common law copyright and California Civil Code
§ 980.
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Federal Design Patent Infringement Against Defendant PATRICK
MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, LLC, Defendant
MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive)
[35 U.S.C. § 71]
68. Plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference each of the other
allegations set forth elsewhere in this Complaint as though fully set forth in this
cause of action.
69. Plaintiff is the owner of the Design Patent with the USPTO
Registration No.: US 8,204,561 B2. (See Exhibit “E,” Design Patent hereto)
70. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe Plaintiff’s Design
Patent by using, selling and/or offering to sell, in the United States and/or
importing into the United States, Counterfeit Goods which embody the designed
covered by the Design Patent. Defendants’ infringing products include all of the
ornamental designs in Plaintiff’s Design Patent drawings. By its conduct,
Defendants have violated 35 U.S.C. § 271 by direct infringement of Plaintiff’s
Design Patent.
71. On the basis allege, Defendants have gained profits by virtue of its
infringement of the Design Patent.
72.
As a direct and legal result of Defendants’ wrongful conduct,Plaintiff has been and will be irreparably and permanently harmed; wherefore
Plaintiff is without an adequate remedy at law. Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled
to, among other things, an order enjoining and restraining Defendants from further
engaging in the infringement of the Design Patent.
73. Defendants’ infringement of the Design Patent is and has been willful
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 20 of 23 Page ID #:20
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 21/51
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to its monetary damages, in an amount to be
proven at trial, and award of treble damages, and its reasonable attorney’s fees and
costs.
REQUEST FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff hereby respectfully requests the following relief
against Defendant PATRICK MATTSON, Defendant STU DISTRIBUTION
SERVICES, LLC, Defendant MD5 TECHNOLOGIES, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive, and each of them as follows:
1. An order and judgment preliminary and permanently enjoining
Defendants and their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees,
affiliates, attorneys, and all others acting in privity or in concert with
them, and their parents, subsidiaries, divisions, successors and assigns
from further acts of infringement of Plaintiff’s asserted Design Patent;
2. For an award of Plaintiffs damages and Defendants profits adequate to
compensate Plaintiff for Defendants’ infringement of the Design Patent,
and in no event less than a reasonable royalty for Defendants’ acts of
infringement, including all pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as
the maximum rate permitted by law;
3. For an award of all damages, including treble damages, based on any
infringement found to be willful, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, together
with prejudgment interest;
4. For an award of all profits, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289 together with
prejudgment interest;5. For an award of Defendants’ profits and Plaintiff’s damages in an
amount to be proven at trial for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C.
§ 1114(a);
6. For an award of Defendants’ profits and Plaintiff’s damages in an
amount to be proven at trial for false designation of origin and unfair
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 21 of 23 Page ID #:21
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 22/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 23/51
legal obligations, or as equity requires;
2 14.Fo r an order
from th
e Court
th
at an asset freeze or constructi
ve tru
st be
3
imposed over a ll monies and profits in Defendants possession which
4
rightfully belong
to
Pl
aintiffs;
5
IS.For destruction
of
the in
fr in
ging articles
in
Defendants possessi
on und
er
6 1
5U.S.C.§
III 8;
7 16. For treble damages s
uff
ered by Plaintiff as a result of the willful and
8
intentional infringements a
nd
acts of counterfeiting engaged in
by
9 Defendants, under 15 U.S.C. § I I 17(b
;
I 0
17.For damages in an amount to be proven at
tri
al for unjust e
nri
chm ent;
I I
18.Fo r an awa
rd of
exemplary or puniti
ve
damages in an amount to be
12
determined by
th
e Court;
13 19.for Plaintiff s reasonable attorney s fees;
14 20.For a
ll
costs
of
suit; a
nd
15 2 1.Fo r such other and further rei ef as the Court may deem just and
16 eq uitable.
17
Q ~ M N D
FOR
JURY
TRI L
18 Plaintiff SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN, LLC, dba SPECK
19
PRODUCTS, respectfully demand s a
tri
al by jury
in thi
s ac
ti
on.
20
21
DATED: August 13,2014
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOHNSON
&
PHAM, LLP
£
i
C
hri
sto
ph
er Q. Ph am, Es
q.
Hung Q. Pham, Esq.
Attorneys fo r Pla inti ff
SPECULATIVE PRODUCT DESIGN,
LLC dba SPECK PRODUCTS
2 1
CO
MPL INT
FOR
D M GES
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 23 of 23 Page ID #:23
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 24/51
EXHIBIT
A
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 1 of 28 Page ID #:24
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 25/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 26/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 27/51
lint
C3.; 9
hior
[J,S.
rCls,l
?I, ?3, 26,36awd33
{Jmirled
States
F;rtemrl aman Tradernurrlq
tDffice
t'[tAD]0MIARI{
DiTEqCFtI,IPJC1STER
IPeg,
Itlo.
3r656,il82
Regislerej
trr
?n 9
IA
TIA1
ENS,
AND
PENSONAI
DIGTIAL
ASSIS.
TnuYni,
rr't
cL^ss
I
(u,s,
clg, ll
,
1, 26,
16
AI'JD
3E),
FmST USE
).3:-2007it1\- COMdERCE
t-3t-:007
Tl{6
hrAFl( coNsisls
oF
r'J.l isTEldsl( BE-
TWEEN
FARENTHESES
FOLLONED
gY
TH8
WORD
TSPECTCI
IN STYLIZED
TFIT.ENS,
sE ,.
NO,
77.600,,1O,
FILED
10.34.1008,
AISH.{
5ArEM, .EL
l,{tNtN.*c
ATtC'tU.tE]'
,Aii,€\
Irrhd/
\t
trj
spEcuLAt$E
ploDucr
DEsloN,
INq
(cALI-
FOn'r-lA
CoRFoRnTloN). DBA SPECK PRO'
DUCTS
]17 FOREST
AVENUE
PALO
ALTD,
C/t
9+301
FoRr
PROTECmTE CARRYINO
4ASES
FOn
PORTATLE
ELECTROI\IC
USTlh'lNc DE1'ICES
.AND
I{USIC
PLAYERS.
N,l]vtELy,
hlPl
PLAyEnS,
3I.iD
FOR
ORT,{FLE COM I.JTER$, GLOBAL PO,
stTJol.lING sYsTElrs
(cps
DEytcEs),
t?tornrE
AT.ID
CELLUIAR
TELEPHONES,
PORT..\I]LE
ItED,
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 4 of 28 Page ID #:27
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 28/51
EXHIBIT
C
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 5 of 28 Page ID #:28
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 29/51
<, Ci.:9
Elisr
U.S,
CIs,
11,
23,
26, 36
ard
3ts
trinlted
Stbtes
Patemrl
and
Tradeuaark
t0ffiee
ITEADEMA$I '
P \trllclPF3
BlEGISlE.il
S CULATI'E
PNODUCT
DESIGN.,INC. I
T'-ONNL,\
CORPORANOI'I),
DBA STJECI(
DUgIS
::7
FOIE5T AVlr'{U.E
I'ALO ALTO, CA
tU0t
CALI.
llto.
E-ez,
Itlo,
J,666,07?
ItcEtbnC .i-q.
JJ,
2889
lA FLAYEIiS,
A)'lD
FIIISONAI
i]tcrAl
,ISSIJ,
TAi.:TS,
N
CLA5S I0J.S.
Cls. ?1, ]J,36,
J6
AND
lB),
FnST
USr
l-31- 00?i
I.l
CoNIItIIRCE
t.lt.zCD?.
THE
]IARI(
Col'lslSTS
OF
/U,l ASTERI]K
Bb'.
T{'EIN'I PAREI\THESE5,
SEIL
N0, ?7-it8,l5l FlLrD
10.?t-? 00.
6lSH,1
SALE
I, EliLlv'lNlNo
AITOn}TEy
FOItr P oTECIn'E
CARltl'll'{G O\SES
FoR
IOJTTAIILE
ELECIITOI'IC
U5TENN{G
DE\ICES
N.tD ItUSIC
PLA)'ERS,
H,\l\tELl"
hIpJ
.tIERs,
AI.TD
FOR IORTA LE
COhlFUNif{s. GLODAL
PO.
slTtol{rNo sysT€hts
(ors
DEvIsEt,
h.toErLr
AhD
CELLULAR
TELETHONIT, t'ORTAELE
NtED.
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 6 of 28 Page ID #:29
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 30/51
EXHIBIT
D
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 7 of 28 Page ID #:30
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 31/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 32/51
EXHIBIT
E
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 9 of 28 Page ID #:32
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 33/51
llilflilIflrll ffi
illllulftilil
ffiil fl[lllll
fiIfl
flnffi
fiI
ilfl
lffi
l
us00820456182
(rD
{Jnited States Fatent
Mongrn
et
al,
0o)
Pslent
No,:
(4s)
Dotc oflatenl:
LJS 8,204,561 82
Jun.
I9,2012
(50
oNE PIiCE CO.lOlL]ltiD
It\TlitUOR
IIART)
SIELL C^SE
WITS.AN
EtnSTO
[ruC
LINER
FOR
IIIOBTLE ELECTRONIC
DEVICES
fi/1999 Al$au5c.ld.
6/ 000 KllchE .Eadi
Ue000 llosrrd,
t .
le00t
Yoncdct<lul.
(Codinucd)
5S0U,l14 A
6,tr7J,563
A
6,t0t,434
A
G,l?t,l::
Ill
(75)
Idvcnror3:
Rtrtn trlU
MrDgnE,
oJnosc,
c]\
(US);
Drwld
lrhn
LrrY, SarllL.,
1YA
(USI
Jorntvch, Srn limrcilco,
CA (US);
Arylr
Lcc
gynlcch
Frohonl"
C
(US);
SttpLcu
Rclgcr
MFft
,
Rdvood
Ciry,
c{
(US)
p:J,,.lrs;gn"":
Spccqlstlvr Produd nlslBq LLq I'alo
llro, cA
(US)
(.)
NoLice:
S$jccl kr lry dlrdiiocr,llc tcrm ofthis
lDtcd
is cllcddcd
or
djurrtd
llnd(ll 35
U.sf.
lsaG)
by
0
4 yr,
(:1)
Appl.
tlo.:
13n82,363
(2?)
Fil 'dr
Oct,26'?01I
(65)
Frlor
Publlcrilon
Drtr
US20120031?ll8Al
fc .9,201?
Rol tcd U.S.Appllcodoi
D t
(61)
Cootinu.itio[
ol.IDliotion
No. lZ3{6,76t,
Iilcd on
r-cb.
6, 2009.
cB
orHlllr.
I'ullLlcdlloNs
Vdle Blducl
nE/ic*
;?ho c
3G
cq.i ltdic*: iltoSz Lur.
LrR :
hup./qs.Fnbhccnmr\\:kh'r1-cli\lE Y74L\
Daic
M
i'l,rd:
JJn, 25, :009
Uploidul
by
phDlldoE oo lm- 15, 1009, I
nB.
(CllnLintul)
Pn-nloD'
Erclrlrril.
-'
RaIicl Fa'rq.-Gutiincu
,4ulrtan
tianir,c
l)utrill Nobil'r
174)
nnomq,,lscn4
or
fin'
-
SNR Dclloo US
LLP
16
ClulEr'
5
rrralving
Shcllt
FOREIFN PA]EICI'
DOCUMIjNTS
746371?
A
l/ 010
(CodllIdl)
(51)
(5t)
(58)
(s0
IDt. Cl,
HA'E 7/00
(3006.0I)
U-s, CL .,.,...,..,.-,. 455/575.8j
20ri/592i 361/679.55i
361167956i 155157
5.1
F/ctd
of
Clursltcolion
SUUr lL,..,.,...,-...,.,-,-
Noo
S
8 Fticorlon
filc
forcoIoplclc rcet
hi$ory.
(57)
^BSTIL\CT
A oE-nicce co'Jornud cxlcrior
,rnl s[ell
c15o
witb
ao
clJs-
ldEaric
lilcrIorEud
ontc
inlcdorot
rc
l4rudorl]Irdshdl
for
rnolilc eluctmnic
devices-
This llunl
rrctrclivc
qlcrior
sficll rllDws
0tc dcvicL
mdxinul
prcllcLion
frdar implcE
ridr sl)llF nbjcEr5whilc the
l(ltcd'orclislonclic
lcrtion
lhnt
IrEvjdEs
ehflcl
F.oEdion
for
tbc dcvicE
lnm iml,D ,
'ltrc
lxrcdor)urdshcll
plnis forDcdro
il tbcGviccclosuly9l
r
Fmrll offnal fmm
ll|c
riuvicL\nurhcc.'l a
u(Icdnrh .rd shdl
nl'5
rrDrnd
rE
cdgci
n[
drc
dlvicE lir ullo{
ltrc
Etcll lo
be
oblu lr
br
mourlsl
on rhE dcvic rhccomcrH
ofliriilDrdrh'ill
ur
dr opr Tlris lllous cnch ridLlvlll
ro
flq
lMy
whtjll:r
dcvlcu
is
insc
cd ond sruD
bocL
orEc il ix I
pu u.
Ilrc
cllslorncric
llllllri0l
fllN in
drc
g F{
crulbd ullh., drollts
ol
lho
c$crjorlurd
sbcll rc
dlow
flcx toroouulilg.
RcforencE, Cltad
U.S, P TIINT DOCUIVIENTS
Sa65;120 A ll/1991 Nrdi(onl
5,U6..1t, ,\
lOIrtS
nnnielcd
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 10 of 28 Page ID #:33
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 34/51
us
E,204,s61
B2
PoBB
z
6,?71,25?
El
6J71,056
BI
65t4.7:2 Bl
6661,t74
EI
6,78J,566
Ur
6p14,?74 Hl
6,980,7?? R?
688t,589 R2
7,11ff,00{ BZ
7J,ll,lel
Fl
D5 1,319 S
D5 1.?46
S
7.551.r,tt
l]:
7,509,512 n:
7$2t,8rr
Bl
i,647,08?
82
D617,?E{ S
7.9t1,t2 BZ
3mt/0002003
Al
r00i/0(no[
Al
t00l/0068 15 At
1rJ03/00?0r5, At
Il0y00[]094
l
o0l/0r03c24
Al
Iqll/ol
t66
At
20{l,tr00l1l06
Al
?00t0151?t At
2@ 8t74727 it
?00t02?9661 l
?0n6/0040550
l
?u06/0t6t800
Al
t0{t?/00602:.1
A
?0t7/0181?81
A
?008,001 718
A
2008/0019t61 A
3008/00 6610 A
:rxr8/0t17507 A
:00&0Ix84
A
20D9IlOt?33t
A
00t/0080151
,1
:0091011ts'll
A
:{r t/o rr+11{
A
:0tq/0006.iIq
A
t0lu/00?gl.tl
A
?0lq0096t6rt Jl
?0lu/010.t814
A
r0l0/0tr618? A
l' rdell
ki:atry
lbeulnl
Ririllrkor
Hobbsg
fiolllbjlg
Rtchr soo 4al,
lllcluGoE cl nI.
l'l'r4lol
0uc$cl$ct 1.
Hu
Xenppi cr
Mclisnncl
il.
Chu,-.,.-."....---.." 455/5?5,{
Llc
ar
il.
,",..,,,.--.-
4i5/57J.s
'r8i
RictinLo
r
L
Chiincy
cl ol,
U.S. I',ATENT DOCIJMENTS
20t0/01{4411
At
2lt0/01477t5 ,1l
?0tqui:t515
r1l
64010
PcnirEill
612010
Yialioli
cr ol
9E010
vld
cr
al.
FOIIIICN I'IIIIjNL DOC:UMINTS
0zllt6t
At 22w?
OTIIBR PllBLlc/ ]ONS
&/200t
lly20D2
9t?og7
lz200l
84004
7T?oE5
113005
lt2.E6
7EW7
3/30 8
r':00t
('300t
6/?00t
97000
Itv:o0t
I
U 009
l/:010.
dlol0
4/:01r
r2001
?20[]
dlo0:t
4l]001
y 001
(irto0l
&3 01
tn00I
?/:Q05
8/1005
lv 005
1J2UA6
7t2006
x,.-pn1
8/ 007
z 000
z:0 H
,l/1008
t/t008
l0/ 008
teflr9
3/ tD
'v20w
vl l],
tEot0
4110r0
4/:010
,v 0r0
J/r0to
S 0cl
Folccdon
ofFotultu drcuDDic
lFdsctr:
Sl'o* td|loE
EpelrM, dlrE8u
boundry.4rFoEh
Bnd
blyond
ClotEl,
5
(RqrdDI)i
P.pabFoulur,
JMi sullivft ,
PIAT&T
Ildl lrbr, L c r
T.cb-ool,WlFls n EI b.600MlAYc,Itrt lb-zIalttumyllill,NJ,
0?974
(?Epri osh.clMdVbhdoa
199?,vol.4,
N..1,
F,
169-191,
ldpEltrB
lhrucl tolcec. ol
nDnol'lc
.lcctrctlc
t.qiEEi
cs
iluJyolcdlul
phonc.
S. Coyd, S.
UpuFiiDlil
D-V.
Lltlclt-l? d.
a' 01Mchsls Covs
Ddrc:
Ms. ,s,
lt9,
PubliEicc
SttiDls
BlsrorlSSNl0014485l
Sirbjcq;
f'rglBc.dn
shn
F.,[t
ElIlI
F
5]
vol,39
here
I
URL: hlF/,,(rdo1,oB/10.100711r02:l:tlu0
Dotr
I0.l007rBm2l?9300i l0
Fp,
Cindyshdl
Sours brF/
vch0nftivt.o'E/w$n00H
ll l80i5J09/
hfl
F,/1w1l*sFlhrEd
cts.com/nEducltct
dyrbell/rplolc.l ,,
16l,lide l&t008.I
F.
Rllu ol s o L EiInElc sp€trugr
i
cl€lFAic
prD.ticr
r$pL$lor
d€ill
Cotd,
S.,
Ello'
CEry
w,,
BuErylltli, Elstd
X. l .
brs-
liri@l
JouEd
ofMilBilrliE
uld
El<uDdc
d.bsir8,
vol
:J,
No. L
Sslold
(lll 1.r,
2000,
pp,
l8?-190lssNr
loal6l
l
Sout
dl
h0nr'/rvlv1{.i'i,1 ir.olgrour il/ 00{/Qvlo}il,Cl,
9pp,
DiiBdrt bcrl.b.clnD
lhlilr.lolsrdIl cdluld
plone od oAcr
ponrllo
r du u
GoFl,
S"
Urrlld,
Stlj.y
S"
dcl, Drllo
M.
lt ll I
r ''Icdhdql JouDd.
ol.
3,
No.
:1, l9t[,pF lst-l?d
DCJI:
10,10{114'ldf,
l3
solFc lEF//dr.'i i.odl0.l{0znl$.3lzl,
?{
pP
il' o
cuc ndicd lloutuF:
vlj ,
Si.I , OEqUo& DLo
d
aonvdc SouEq
hlp.//*11erlol,ildEbEtiq 1lom,riPett'llllon .
csq.lwic$Ih crstd:
S.P. 27,
201l,8PP,
CnpiulcRctEFx
tDr IPI@o
lG Sout .:
llF/scbrdr
coE/,*tb/
?008 13501 Z I
I4ft tlPy'/t*.Itwinrl( ..rtcedPlod{cts4lcb.U
R.tcl.p F,
Drc.
25,
:008,
3It'.
Crttiirtjloo,
for lFhn 3G Sou.e brF:,lA8b.NhlEolE4liv
:00
g
12220500,1
t&oD:r/$1d,Nit
h6ty
cdr'/pFducG/Ns/N.o.
IllFi
Dd.21.2008,4pp.
Slrt G 'lysbclt
fo ll'bolc
lG
Sousc
brl :/,r{cl,shlvc.rEl
$rtt:00901
I91l
llxt4,urg/ilouEgsorEiid4Pl'Crlq*redryl
rlcl'@d)6tclllor.iplolo.3€.
J$, I6,
:0q1,
?FP.
sI*q
Pr:l
lS20l0/OIll0 lucl
Je
:c,
Z0l0i lnlcln
lonl
srtur PqFrq ISMJSi M r. JL l0l0,
3
pP.
'
cilEd by $nlrincr
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 11 of 28 Page ID #:34
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 35/51
{.LS. Fatent Jur,
19, 2012
Sheer
I
0f 6
10
us 8,204,561
B2
12
r5
16
13
23
17
18
z6
F[G" {
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 12 of 28 Page ID #:35
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 36/51
{1,S.
Fatent
Jun.
19, 2012 Sheet 2
0f
6
20
13
F$G" 2A
12
us 8,204561
92
20
12
20
13
n--"
"
FEG"
2B
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 13 of 28 Page ID #:36
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 37/51
U.S"lPatent
Jun.19,2012
Sheet3of6
12
20
FEG"
3
us
8,204,561
B2
21
23
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 14 of 28 Page ID #:37
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 38/51
U,S.
Fatent
Jun.
19, ?oI2 sheet 4 of
6
21
F[G.4
20
19
FEG" 6
us
8,204,561 B2
13
12
13
,12
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 15 of 28 Page ID #:38
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 39/51
{.LS.lPatent
Jun.19,2012 sheets016
IJS 8,204,561B2
21
n
19
13
22
12
F[G.5
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 16 of 28 Page ID #:39
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 40/51
U,S,lPatent Jun.19,201?
Sheet6of6
u.
us 8,204,561
82
12
lJ
F$G"
7A
FEG" 78
13
tt
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 17 of 28 Page ID #:40
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 41/51
us
8,204"561 82
72
ONE PII,:CE CO.FoINII|D
g-T{TERIOR
D.ilrD
Dsc 6
lilic
rhc
tdil ot
rs
o.iiBJ
pbodc
usd would
likc
lo
SIIELL
(:rsl;
rYlm, \
l,f,.ASToMEIUC
Elli
0h
dur
fctl
bm still
* l
llmrcsliod
for
rhcir dcdcc.
LINER 'oltMoBILEELECTRONIC ltebrdlmrccrivccxtcdnrshcllofdl'prcscotisv@0oob
-_ DEVICE.5
o
low
cocfficicntofllictior1
Tbis
alloNs
th
dcviccro cosily
bc
J
$lirpral
h
llod our of
poEkcc
catily wi$oul
bccdt{ng
IUifjUfD.^PUUCAIIONS
ollscLld or
wi$oul
Ercxt
rcsist&le.lo
clolhjoE
EDleri |s. r1
rrujor coElhiql.lioE
cuErtrl
(,'lilstc@criu
q.lsc
usJrs.
Tbis lpplication
i5
0 coMINUAIoN
of u.s.
pltctrt
lho
c.se
lmgl
by lbc
ltlccnl
iuvcrtioD
br's
trn
inlcrior
Dppticali;;
Scr,
No. U.,lf6,?69,
lllq.d
f.cb,
6
|
200r,
ll. ;
cD -
cla onc;c
lortior
lh l.
Frovid6.shork
Prclecliod
for lhc
d;b
of
which
is
iDcolronltb
l"r"ir
ry
'.roio*,
r0
da'icc f| D1
d'ofFr.E8;
ljrls'
or
olhcr
iftlnta
TlL
i te'io'
clustoncdc
loaion
nL
o
c{rsurcs thc dcvicc ond thD tasc Jit
'ILOIMCAI-
lil|jLD
OF TIIE INVLN]ION
rogerlrlrrviu o
guire
us
tho
q$c
is
singlc
pictc
ossetbly,
IIID
cre
b 3
0
vcry Eolid
mnorcliotl
lo Io
lhollc
DEd
fcEI6
1tc
prEstlr
iqvcotloE
rluca
$inoElly
ro
llldbrld
Eobilu
lalrcErly hilh
quDlily
ud
li8lnvciShl
elect$iic
drviujr.
sucll I|J{
pcr:onaldicitol
ossislopl, ccllu.
15
\{lul
mokcs
lLdr
cascdiJlcrc[l
ie lhcgcollclry
der u_
Ior
rdlcplouq
lab
top compirtcn nr
poiobl€
rliBitr Ercdh
frcluritrgofthecsre Thcc](lcliorhltJdsll :llnsd
ic lorucd
to
plryv.
ttlorc
4ccifiirlly
llie
pnscoi iouurion nlotcs ro a
lil
lhc tlq.jrc cl0$sly wilh n lnnqll
olTFet
lmn
tho
dcviccs
'arulriph+oopincnr
pnxrcLivi:
crsc for mobilc
qlc{trcnic
curlsca
T[c cxlsrior
hard
sllcli rJls
lJotlnd Lha cd8cf oltltc
dEviar,
du'icc it is lbrmd for.
lo
lllow
*rc
6hcll
to
bc
ablc lo bc
:o
lDo olcd
on
d$
devlcc
tllc corluls
ot
lhc
blJtl Ehcll all, cur
opus-
Tlis
alloivs
coc)r
sidqf,all
10
fls
ovty whc d$,ie
is
i'$cncd
srd snlr bnEL
orcc
ir iE
io
CocllTtDuEiflc
r+nr
nr
th'E
crs€ is
rhnl
6c
elndomeriE
malrdd ls
formud
in
uddillon
lo Uru rlcriorhlrd cll
nn tll
inlcriorof tllEcncrior
hud
slcl, thu cl loolL=lE ltilluri l
lllls ir
Utc
goF
ctd(cd ol
ibe
corqcrs
ollbc srtcdor
hdrd
$cl)
L
rll'iw
dic
Ldrd
r[cl
to
Ilcx
for ]0untioB, Tlc chsllE
ric
roalcriul
is
Frovidcd
inl-hls
loEr ion
tc.auu it hll
mucl,
gE1rlst inlcrcrt fl$db:liry t0n
lhc
trhrlic
Drnul
lollic
cxlcdor blral shull
d
it slilctcs
sulEuicntly
to
.rlLrw
drc
sirlc*nlls ofdrc
qlctior
hard shcu
10
eljll
IL*
r]ray
on
mourtilg.Thk
cl(stcsa olc..pic'cc
c[scdrol
wtats
orDuld
phoru
oro rumobilc
clectronic dcvicc
crto
on
l,ollllrg Dod
plsvcds
difl md Ruid fmo cnrcrioE
whur'
cvlr bossible.
'l
be
clD5toharic lincrolso
can bo
ftmcd
olEr
uru
b'r:ttDns
0n
thc
drouu
whufti
u
us .simply
pirrll5
rbE
clnnofteric
linErmrEr nndils
lo
ll)c
Iloaioo
of
Gc
mb;lc
cbcrNDlc dLryhc lnput
dlol lrdcsircd.
BNEF DESCR]TTJON
OF'fHTi I)IT41VINCS
TIrc srrompDnyhg
dD$in8s, whjc
&c ircorloFlcd
hcrci
Ed
lbnn s pan
o[ 6c
slcsi]icolion.
illuslmt
dre
I'Il,rcol
irrslioo u d,
logrLbcr villl
Urc dr5cril,tion, fuihcr
Ecrvc
l$
uxtloin
d)c
nrinEinlc
ofdlc ilvcllioa
ud'l
ttr
crublc
o
prcon
slillc.t h tltc
Fdhcrt
irn
lo
m*
Erd uc Ib
i[vcrlio&
EIC.Ih
0
pcFpecrivE
vias
ofo bsDdlElddsviEcFml
rcrivc
m9c
delicllo
lhu o0crDll
hld
sLcll loycr
rvi6
cDlcoEcrr
Dod
unor
rlrnomcric lrycr
oftlru
prull.clivs
srrting
qlse
whcrc
illills
io
rc
crt co(llerg ofthc'etlertll
hrd 5Ic1l hyq;
fIGs.
s nnd 2j
lrE
scEriold
eiL.#
ofihDprulo4ivc6tc
ol thc
pnrcor
lnvmdon
slrnvi 8
rhu dcrcnl cr -lllcd by *t
inner cl0nancric
ldyF lor sccudsg
dsvice
in
ro c sc;
$lO,
r
:s
ll
lop
'.Elbes d
yls
of
a
budlcld
dcvicc
Iorcclirr-
cosc dcf,iclirg$c a(cmo) atd
EhcI
lsycrwilL
cu
concts
d irllcrc'dl1orEsic
luycroldLc
pNle€livc crdyiDg
ciro vhctc
is
filh i-o lhr cul comels
oI
l
cKcrnll L0td shcll
hycr dllllsddilionll
I
orBo cllstoDc[ic
ovcrltnd
tor
sccirn
ldg
o
dcvic ;
l;l(1, { iF
sl:cLiooul
vi w
oIUe
pmlEclivc
c 5c Ltftlc
pt tctr
hN'cndo
slowi 8
tlru
)urEc
closloEctic
ovsbrnd
for
s8 ur'
iog
r
duYicli
ljlc.5
is
n
pc$pLYlivc vlc? of
thc
FtDtrttivc
c05c oflhc
niE.icD
Invcnrion
brfurc dsviEc ir
su-Un:] dluI[in;
llC. 6 is Il
pc I 'cdvlt
vjcw ollhc
Irutuclivc
clls(tlllucbcd
lo
a
sompls
dcvic
shorv'irg
&c
dclcol
crslcd
by
lbc
iolcr
cl flomlric
la)'cr
Ior
$cclE irg u
devicc
in
lb', cnsq
md
BACKCIROIJND
OF 1'I
IJi
IIWENIION
Tlcru
ilro
m $y
sJscs for lEndheld
elcclrloic
dcviccs.
]l'ry tall iolD fuu
Elin
crlssedcr
F:hstolrutidtublcr
ekirs,
llJd
plarric
rhilk,
cu lld sLN
$rlctidls
lld
c€obi-
lItjori
of fte5c, In
gcncn
l
lbRclaslomcd crscs
llc tiodc
ski
wUc ,
blx[usc
ofttc
flcxjhle lBlurE
ofdru nulcd0l, m
uu\ily
hc
sucrched ovu'
tlc
devico
rnd
dlfr
oncc
illndlql
collorm
closely
tu
tI(.
sbq,o
ol
Uo
qcvicc,
Tle rubtsry
rrurcriul
trrD
pr$vidclcry
EDorl
$o krEiiellucu.
ll)c do$'l-
sidc
offtesc
rypcq
ofc,acr
ii
lbal &c
dlnorcric
llllerial
lns
a
lriglr
.ftED
friclon
scmcilat. tt -c lruJils fiis ryFc oI
crse
dilficuk
lu
llE
io
Dsd
rEeovc
liom
pockcGltodolhci
righl
th@.
Whrris nrL{d is r
devicc
ltul
oncre
llerery
good
stoElirlj3;Irunccofu n
cft
Lelirflrtricerrcwi$oul
w hid]
slrlucc t iclior
.ocllicicot
mo$rs il morc
cowcqil.Ilcc for
Ijhrd
lloltic
rlulls
norDouy
Bro
Ennui0ctlfcd lls roorc
ElnonBplecelosllow
tlEdevircl0 Flideinln
thcc4qcfu loru
bElDgcloscd
jo\r,jlhrsEcoEdlrypllts,Additiunrllythcf
y,ill
a0
oftco llrvc s
lilcr
ofclllromcric
Eulfdul,
Nhldr
h l s
Io
cuslion
te
iLvicc.
Tb
.r
bo
co-mold.d,
Irlo
cldy
sluclEd
nrlloaliog
rrith
thc ne*:fibly. Cul
nad S "w c€e{:s
&c
soEtlllly
d0dD
lloh
flli
rto [
matcrid,
wL]cfi k cut
jrlo
lalrenls
uod 0rs L'wtriDlo
u
Elups
lbrllhc
dLaie co
ilido
rr
futo.'ftc
dcaicc
lE
dl,n
llcld
iD
lluuo,
by friclion
or ll
dlrnl
of
soEc fDrE.'l-hc
downsids
o
ttlsc
dcviccs
isrhut it clln bc
difrlulr
ro
lulchcd
u dr{ic{
to
rigiLl
c$e, or+hrfli n casc
hls D sEcoodrry
llEcc
for $jcurlng
s
&vicc,
it
cln &i bull
Io
d'cmmbinndon oldrc dcvlcD
qrd
cIrE
mnkitrg
it imtnctic0l,
l0
AdditioEllt
Ur nni
ullcur
ofcarc'
which uc rlqul$tl
to
bc
cul
uod sc\rh togcthcr
gIthdy
hclcurcs
cosl wh (
is
lll.dlxl
G a
trrEu
tLat combinut bor lad slcli
cEscs oDd
closluEcric E
criul llr
ii
clry
lo
Floducc
ald ruqulrEs
minlor
raolcriDl ;n
lll
pnduclion.
55
SUMMTUTY OF
TIIP I}IWNTION
'[tu
llrtlrn
illvclrtion
is
un
implowncn
Dwr Oe exigllng
flscs bc{ausc il coEbioL.s ll:bcstfEaNftcoIbolhb dcusu 6
and
thc
duroEcriE
6cc€ \vhjlc tr-ilB ooly
r
siEsic
pln,
which
i5
lJrdicrlt,lrly
uscfbl
fro@ i
cnnsus]cr
vicrvpo_lll
lte
nrcscor
iovcrdon
pmvldcr
s
hld
prulcclivc
cxlcrior
sLtcil,
'Ilir
hld
Frutccdvc
cxlljrior
slrEll
allow3
$c dcvlcr
muxl-
rDuE
luolcclio
lrom idpacrs wiur slurp Dljclli
] e
bllfd d,
Fml{cdvccxlcdorrbcllEjD
cs
UicnnirholsEislirgphoncr,
MPt4
)nyc$.
d i.t
orlcr
Eobilc
clccBodc
dcvicca.
Mrlly
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 18 of 28 Page ID #:41
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 42/51
us 8,204,561
82
34
IICS. ?a
D[d
76 uc
ncrspcllivcvic{rs
oftlc
pnscrl
iqvco-
cur
\yould
bs torE
d
io Uc clostoEedc onlcriol bur thc lkr.
lion
dctlctil8
lhc c.dctDnl
lurd rbell hycr.q,irh
cut
Eolsun iEB
lo slloc o dcvicc tq
6
iNuded
lnto
$clmllcrivc co5c
aDd i (.I cLsrlotluric hycr olrhc
pDlecries
r rryiEEmsci
would('lacGomthDhfitcl.Ertcri
,osdtgrir,cullinglwry
a
rc$lrt,
-sccuring
posilinn
trnd
in
ar
c<pnod,:j,
dwice
ins.r.
drc conlcrs
oflhc
coe e
llows
drc sldes lo
coslly flsx.
riod
}ositjoL
5
FIGS.
20
c[d
6 Brc arctiord
viE{rs
otllle
prulectivc
cosclo
DrirAlr.F.DDEscRu'r'roN o'rr'rNvlN'roN
*9".Xff'ffi:Hiil'fftiT#$t"lHli:fl,1lBfltit.;
'1 c
proicclivc
cllc
I 0
b liilcd
ro
chsp o o dcvicc
19, ord
In fle fDllol'lng dqlilud.
dL{cripLjon
o I
thc
inwndon
0I hcorf,omtgs B dctcnt 20
l0 cnsule
FnuE lnd
tecurB fir,
r,.xqlFbry
snti imeol-e
o[ r
invD'tirrl Nfei.r cis d
lo
ln
unaltqHlivc
clnhodiEEdl
lll
ehow[in LrlGS.2,
nnd {,
tn tleur:urupiuryiogdrnvin$
(rv}]lN
lilio nurDteE repreEent 'udditiulllllJgc
cbno$oric ovcr]Elg 21 Ior
s€puriDB
g
likc cleEuoL5), wlicb form
pil
hclEoi
iod
in
,, hc
ls
dsvicc
19
Euy
bc
i[clrdEJ
ja
t
prlrerilJc
rasc
10. ftis
ihlrvll
by w,iy o[ ilhEtntio[ spcciliE ersEplary
cobodl-
illuet&lcs
r
pos5iblc
lllcrDltiye cebodipcut wherc dtbcr
ments
in vhich
rbe iBvcnfoo ruy
bc
plaEticcd;
lllese
dur lDvjng
sl
uEdercur
in
tbc
cxtemd
hud
sheJl
llyEr
3
Eid
cmbodlmc[ls
llo
dcscdbed
jn
sol5cicot
dcuil to
enlblc
dNsc
rs
lts comsloodlogsldcs
0[$olrolcctivc
coio
]0,
thc
iloc
shilld)
inthr*t
to poctice
dre
Javr:ntio4
but
othcrruburli-
cllGtomaric
l0ycr 13
fortrs
Ic{hrcs $t wolld
Eccurc
t}a
ncnlsdsybculiliEd
dlogjcol,Eccl.anjcul,clactriml,a[C
prolcclivc
cage
to s device
lll.
ottcr chu 8cs Esy
be
m0dc
wirh'iuL d+orlisg fn)m d$
amps llc5c tcslllrc€
could
c
d0lcnts
2 0 B3
daEribcd nlolg
thc
ofthcl'l $c idvr5lidd,'ltclollowlngdorlilcddcscriJ'tioair Eidoorroplhd boflom ofr-hoc./tuIldtlld
sbcu
hycrL orlr
6et€ lirre, oot
ro bc
lllilll
in
r limhlng
eDs€,
old
llllcolcof
)u
could
bu
o hrg
srla lllu
iluslrfitul
in Fl6S.
2l
lnd
C
whlTe
tbe
prescot
ilvudlloll iE
dcllncd oDly by dle
qrlcldcd
ctqis5.
o
sddjdo ] IlBe
chnoEctic ovcrtEng
zl for E('urirg o
'I]uiDvllriouwi
tunv
lcdescriLdwitl
rEfun:
to
Flc,
dcvicE
19
rruy hc irclirdLrlindclrDtcrLivc
cnsc
10 so
th[t
o
1, rvhich
ie 0
prss cclivo
visfl
oftbc
prolccliyc
casc 10
dcpict.
dcvfuc
vro ld
bc
slippEd
uldcr
ord
sc.urd
lbcrcby
si{r
sod)o
ing
rhc
ouler ldyer
o .r.bc
prolccrivc
crsc
1 1,
ciEprieillg $ro
loro ofudd$c{l
o lbc olpo6itc
c[d
NbucrEoldcd'r.nto
drc
gEiomlc
llycrs, bo filst cncnDl lrnrd
lhcll
l0ycr l2 nrd [ 15 cncmalbrd ltull luycrl?
or dlc
iElcr
Ehsloduric
hycr
1:l.
lNoDrl ilterior
cluslu [cric
l y 'r
t3. II0 [Nl
lrftmli
lud
As
slllv h lilcs.3
nds, tu €(lcraEl]r&dsllulllryL"rlz
shcll
Isycr
12
$nd r
sccold inlcdor
closl rcric
Inyc.13
Ilrc
dcfrlcs
r
fucd
ovity
22
finedto
chsp
ooto
q
device 19
3 d
coDbiuLal ro
iodllaldcady [ ch
lo
r
hnldllu)d
drvlcE 19
ircorForqcs
s dErolr 20
ro
Fosurc
a EsuB 0 d eci.ue iil, Thc
lnd i.Ecorpomre |lt lc6st ooc vicE inE wioq|lw 11, iryut/oulput h'6dhald dlvicc 19
lrslocEvc
cisc dcpicls dlc cxlcrurl llard
lcccss
I'orr515,16,
nld I?, ood moldcil'clueIDm$ic
covu: ]n lbdl lot'trl2
withcul co@q€23
lDdi crobsloEoriclrycr
ovcr dsyice bu[ons,
l]Eccsriihlc
ll10rEh hol':3
h
6c ord drcll l3 of0u
prolrllivc
qrryinB
crsc whcII: 6c lnncrc]eiloncri
c
18
0nd
26. This
lur
plolr)ctivc
'xrc;or
uhcll
12
ullows lbc layq $ lllls
h
Lho
cul cohqs
23
of$c
l*lcrlll
lutd shdl
devicc lD0ximum
l'rorcrtio
hrn imltlcls wilh sfilrp sbjErs. loycr 1 ,
Thc
cr.lcrlll
brrd
slil I
hycr I2 dri mius Urc Ihlih
ol
cxisilg
IYILDI
E kc6 drls
cssc
difcEol is
lhc
gcooctry
ond
ntnu-
pbolcr,
lvlF3/4
lluyeF,
nld orlfi,'rnobllc
clcluodc dcviccl.
rl
f0ctudDg
oI Uc
(nse
1le
frelall
hlnl
sltll Joyq Iz i3
Mllny rl'crs likc
lhlr
fcll
o
llll oligiDrl
drDn
0 d
would
lilc IorEcd lE
I]l ll dcvlcc r
9
doscly
\ri
rlJsDrllofEcl[1]Elic
ro
m0
intairt
rhlt trrl bul elill
\v n
n'Er .ctinn
lor
lheir
dcvicc
dq/iccs
surhEc
Tbc
o(tcl l
hlrd shcll
iryll
12
rsps
lnrund
rr,-lllu
q(t|5 l
hurd rlrcll Inyer13
otllc
rcscll
'ravc[liDE
dr cdScs
ofu dsvicc I9 il
i5
forEsd Ior.
To dlow toq(lcra[l
Ilo5 lo$r coclllciclt of
frictieo,
1ti5 ollowi
thc
dwic lo
lrsrd
slcll
ldlcr
12 to be ablc ro
b
motrlcd
Dn
dsviEc
1.9
lbc
c'$ily bc 5liplcd i[ old our ofpoclicls
eaily
wi[rout
bcrom-
lo
coruurs 23 of lbc
cltlcfld]
ldd
shdl Isycr
.12
urc
ctrt opc
ioB ultuchdl oruiihour
grcrtnsi tmcE
ro
clothinE
notcridls-
Ttis ollorvs otch sidr:ntll
oflhc
E(lcflrl
bEd shcll laJer
xt ro
Nilh
lifih:r
rEfDnnco
10
FlC.
l,
lhc
cncmll
h
d
cll
ller
nvry
whcn
r
doicc
19
i5
iDr(cd
[na snol
bldi
o E
it
hylr
I2
is
uruElgrl
n
Urc
sscold
iircdor
clarlotDcric hycr is ia
llacu,
]lc
uiriilrc
osDccl
ofihe
pmleEtivc
care
1[
iJ
[hut
13.
'I c
e{tclnlrl
hnrd shcll
ldycr
I
Z
unrl lbc
fulcrior
cllsio.
0n
innlr
ulflsto(oEric
jrycr
13
ie
tordlGl
io
oddilio .lo tllD
&cric
lay$13
lauy hc0tt0c ed i.usevcrdl wlys;nrch r
ghc,
{5 cxlcro lllnl lbcll loycrlz
on$e inlgriorolllc
cnlelDll
lad
cblmicll boadi.Dg, haoLi & liaqt u -JLed cllcmiclk orutry shcll lqtr12.'1 c
illcrchslosrctic bycrl3
Ellt itrdc80Fs
oiher mErD
lsow IIl tle
0t1
a{rich
pontrllnl.r
ly
lltdch
dro
crcotcd
t
the
.oEetl
23
ollbe
e cmll hlrd shall
llyer U
lo
crEmll
d
rliu l0ycr
12 to lhc
llilarior
ehsioE{:rjc lu}dr rllow de
eflcm0l
b d
DhLtl
bycrJz lo ocx
drlrlng
@ollnd,lE
l:1,
Thc iltcdor
clflrlumlric pofllon
I I
J'$vides
abock
pll).
dc
sho$a
iD FIcs, 7d End
70.
rcrdon
for
Lhe dlvicc iomdnrlping,
hlis;
orolrerimpuEli, to
'Ilc
i cl cllsoEcriE
loycr 13
ls
lFvidcd
i lhi
lscrtis[
Tbu
jrlcrior
cbst mcric
loniou
l3
olno
cnsults tb
dlv;cc
I9 bc.ourc it
h0s
tnrich
gr 0lcr
inhultol tiedbiliry
&os
$c
til$-
nd
bc
FrDtrrlivc
clsc
10
lir
togulhq
virb
o
gDp
u
th
tjc
or )Eb
I
ofih cxlcm0l bod shcll loycr
12
,ld
it
sEclchc6
FrorEcdve
crsc
I
0
is
r
iirElo
liccll
0sscmbly.
ftc
pNrcclivc
iulllcicr
lly
I
o
luov rhu
sidp1vdls
of ltu &tlcrr.sl furd shcll
6rc lljll
rr
vsy Fljd
comuElitrn
ro
r
dcvjco
19
ultl fuclu
loycr
12
to lrill
llL't
uwsy or nuunlin8
u, sbown
it
FiGS. 7d
cxrlcqlely
Hsb
quJiry
lnd llgl$,*uiELri. JJ
lnd?r,ll
q6tcs
n
oD -I'i'rc
Frotcctivt
3 c
I0llrt
wFpE
Depundiog ou B$lfEcturinE roc loG otlcr Eqtcrisls
& 'nd r dcri.c cvu
oD
mmlrB
ond
prgvcn$
djr 0od
fluidc
Endc c ucd to rcpllEr ihc lsrd
plastic
uscd y
lLc
cxlijrul iiaE
cotca.iig wharcvcr
lossiblc
I&{ shcll r )'.?
12
t6
FEftrd
atrllodlfilnnr
oInE
I'crslr
aholllqclnfloEslclutclri u13o
ce bclo@El
eK'rlE
irlvsrli'ro. Fur
cxljlsplc,
if
il uus dasind to r
lc
u
EL'ury
bultorE on s
dlaico
19
1lJhcnji
I
trsc.
siqlPly
tnJssc
ftc
dD cxtoscrJ i[ c. c)Dslorocric Ioycr
1f,
corr .sPoodioE lo tbc
lor.
tioa
of
thc
Iooulc
elcctrDoic
dsvico
iDlul tbil it duslcd
as
illoslJdrcd
by
lhc hrlron
18
o dz6
oE Fl G. 1.
FIGS.
7o
:ad
?,
rrc
Frspccrivc
vi6r,s
of IlIc
prcscst
invcdon
dsicriDg
r.hc
qrunnl
hlnl
shcll
lntrr
12
qtidr
clt conlcr
23 ond Inncr
65
clunorDl.ric
hycr
13
oI
thc
prolccllvo
corying cre I
0
is
o
rcsdng,
sccorilg
losidon
z1
ltd
ln
a sxlJindcd,
dsvicc
irEonioo
losilio
25.
uh$omcdc corDbo for ho
pBrccriv crsc
10
wiuorJl ovcr-
banEs
in
l[c
lErd oDrcdal,
ir
t]'is o{olrlplc rnebi, siEplE
bcadil8
prgccss
could bu conildc(.d
Jor
du E
ual
filrlufac-
Nrin8
A
orcr
ooldrxt
inrcdor dorlorDlric tlycr
13
eould
Fmvldc
tfic
urderE1)lg
lo
scq.uE n devicE-
lllc
ftuhl r hqrd
I
0
Entr:ridl
vould
ttun
siEply
pruvidc
u
fillgr$vork
lor
lhr:
fio
licrDrlij ul idlcrior hyt
rnd
:r
lso
prDvidc
&u
L'ldsric
sdF-
Dcss
ro rllow
lbc dcvicc lo
bc
held i
dl ol,caiBg.
Tbe
uldcr-
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 19 of 28 Page ID #:42
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 43/51
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 44/51
EXHIBIT F
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 21 of 28 Page ID #:44
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 45/51
q r
I
4r
I
liq{L-q - ir 4r,
qalE
Bnsh16s
com&r
ll'orMrlor
oesdinihn:
shoppl.qcan
PayPa$'
Overurel
Aid
rrlr,ne
'
JurdrcR
Hinory shlernenls
Fssotu'Lon Cenler Prcfle
Trai',sa.tion
DeI?rils
lloll e
ExFess
clr€ckdr
pnyne{
seln
( nique
TEnsadlon
tD
*2\,357324wH31
3320D)
Originar
Transaction
Dn
T'p.
P@r{ 1o
STu
oisldbuir
Sq€
crbronrer
seMre uR :
rr:1i
lsi@r
tr
d51pr b ..m
cGlqnor s€Mce Ernr :
nldji1
r4t|.ulq3eridltrlr
, rl
ned Tolnt
s9 99 USD
Snles T.rt:
SldpDirrg:
$351USO
Seller lscdrior cln'res:
$000USD
Told no[n:
-sI3.53
usD
Fee
fltuxr[:
$0.00 Uso
D .:
Jan ?9 2013
Tirtr4:
?334 5/
PsT
St
rE
compleled
'it.ii;
i:
':-:
CA9130?.1502
|.:
:4
pnyDern
lo:
STU Dislrlbul on SBMcBS
Ohe
reoplenl ollhl€
palmenlisvEritletl)
S.ls
s
I0:
dtsmarlFhonesEro0P
s. :d's amiI
con
F n( ru Ti4€:
lnslanlTtanster
Fmdr{ Sorr c€r 11
3 53 USD
-
J
P MORoAN
CHASE
6ANK
NA
ChecNnq
(Conthed)
x ?735
&rckUpFnndru Sor .€:
Masleoad
Credil
Cad
Eoq-Do0(.)C4C<.
a
341
TrnckiruNtrtrJDr:
940010S6SSS38334263532]j
order
sr.nr6:
sh
poed (Jon
30,2013)
Need herF?
rfy00
have
poblehswih
an
eEeyhansa.l on
orenrhelF se
inq a d spute
with
ah eEaysete(
qololhe?+zvFe.o 1'onae.l.rPa',falandeEatslrongVrecor.mendlhatrcuaiempltorcsotreissues
dne.iysrh
lhe selle. {4renever
possrble.
4Cs'.l'-\
qolqdli1
L@14tsp - 4; 4r
Er.,3rr Ee.-3j SLs,t_e ,a4r,gl
FJ
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 22 of 28 Page ID #:45
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 46/51
EXHIBIT G
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 23 of 28 Page ID #:46
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 47/51
trli
l,()5I
AGl.: t'Aill
l'itllt.ry
lir.1w2-.,
ConrBasPrrr.e
'
l'.-
-r.
lJ
tl:ja,:
r:i:,ir,,l
:::rll'r'l
'( t3:)
&,
xa
ffi
ffi
,,:i,
i
l
:r
,l:,r
r:;ri
::i:lr :
::.a.;
:::::
Jp
:i:it.
U,SPS
FIRST-CLASS'NN
PKG
PhTRiCK h{ATTSiCi:
IS4 rf{DLrST,qi^r El.",U
i;-[:
i"-iltli".ii
;FrE\
Tx
75i-tii-
i-*,
,
l,
I
;
t
-
-t
:.
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
l
1
I
1
I
{&
I
irtl.r
1109$
gss
0000
l:.
a,
:.:.:::a,)t:L:':.:tl.'.:,.:'...::.):'::'.":|:,':::.:',t'.):::|::::.::::::..aa.:.:
{ f J
\'w
?
t
l
USPS TRACKING
g
A
l
I
I
i
I
j
I
slli.,
$.flLr
w
i];Y,
w
ffi
'rill,'.::.
383
84
268$
32
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 24 of 28 Page ID #:47
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 48/51
EXHIBIT
H
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 25 of 28 Page ID #:48
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 49/51
$-q
I lep
I 5.,.s&r itcrEtoi
Fe50rloncenler
Prolle
Payqag
ove
ew
Add rlone)
v\,ftidraw
Hlsrory
statemEnts
Trrr r.i i{]iiril
Dataias
I
rvp.
Js29,2013
Add
Fsds
trcn
q
tur* Accdir
[,lohle ExDr+ss
CrFckorI Pnymrn
ser|r
(Un
que
-rransaclior
rD+] 6097902T00716{3ro
0.6
Je
?9, ?013 PayEni To STU oKrbLlo^ sdvies
9rYi139:'.-q
cnsrormt
sdli.e
EnE
l
4 &uear 4q
snhd
51e(
h
i.n
PHOIE
5
SPECK
CA'IDYS.]ELL D€'P VOITT
]
AAUA COLOR, ICV\J.
UISA SELLER
&rsirBssCor ndlr(otrnnlioll
CudoDH
S€Mce URL:
teh Tor.rl
$17.54 USO
snl,es Tnx:
slrlDtlrt:
$l
21 UsD
Selhr
'tscourn
orclfr08.: $0 00 USD
Tor.rr.x'b
'ir:
$1875
USD
Fe.
dmun:
$0.00
USD
N€r
ronn:
-$18.75UsD
tl
e:
Jan 29,2013
Tioe:
?3 34 55 PST
sr.mrs:
comploled
Des.ripttotr:
thopprng Cad
1:rri-,r.i.:
rCA
91 302-1 50?
P(rynletrr
To:
gTU
Dislribulion € e ]c3s
(fhe
rccipisnr orrhis
paymentisveriiled)
Sells D:
md5le.hn0l0qles
Selleis
EDnn:
tr
rElr
Tme:
lnslanlTransler
Frrxlfug Sor[
ce:
5l
g.l5
USD
-
J P. MoFoaN CHr'€E BANK
NA Cho.kirq
(Connm
eO
*
2785
BnckU0
FntrdiroSorfi
ce:
Maslecard
Credil Card)CCq-IIC{X.FOC(-4844
I' nc|i{,
N{tr
,e':
9t00109699S395?4250790;:1
C
NEII USPS
ordet
sl.ntrsi
sh
pped
(Jan
30,2013)
Needhep,lfyouhdsproblemswhaneEatnansacliororMnthelpsehlino dspulewilhareBayselrer
00l01he
ee3 FesrLulion ceilEr
PayParandeEa/slrontryrecornmendlrralyoustempllolesolyelssues
dlreclywilh lhe
selerrhenerer
possib
e
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 26 of 28 Page ID #:49
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 50/51
EXHIBIT
I
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 27 of 28 Page ID #:50
8/10/2019 Speculative v. Mattson - Complaint
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/speculative-v-mattson-complaint 51/51
I
I
ii.r
'.1-
1J
;
.--
i;i;1-l
i;
;i:>
.{
c:s
lrsi
t,()s
I
A(;I t,Alt)
flilrrr-,y
firlwt:
s
C
onrEas
Prrce
-
.-
4
Fi'r'i
7
o.?i[:i.,*
q
ri:i_
I
USPS FIRST.CLASS'*
PKG
ililt];i
:ECHi.i
OL.CGi
E
E
'
9;
ittlu:5:TFilr,:
?;r./D
:j-5
1...r-
.lC(ii.i,l.rE'i
T,x.
75ii05-7:."i;
i
,l
I
I
I
:
r':i:
l.l
..
:.. t
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
0000
f'&
,}
,,,',:;;,
;
t;,11,,i;;;1;,.;;:,C
A [j
1
3fl 2
'
r.r,r.:.,r.r"i. rr.:r:r'irri:rr'ri::.r'r)-r:i,l
150.l
.,. USPs
TRACKING
#
I
I
I
I
ffi
lilill
ffilifi
Case 2:14-cv-06465-ODW-PLA Document 1-1 Filed 08/18/14 Page 28 of 28 Page ID #:51