11
Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013 Lee Pesky Center Dr. Evelyn Johnson [email protected] SESTA Gina Hopper [email protected] SLD

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

  • Upload
    hashim

  • View
    22

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013. Lee Pesky Center Dr. Evelyn Johnson [email protected] SESTA Gina Hopper [email protected]. SLD. Agenda. Introduction. 1. SLD Construct and Policy. 2. Process for Peer Review. 3. Case File Calibration. 4. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Specific Learning DisabilityPeer Review 2013

Lee Pesky CenterDr. Evelyn Johnson

[email protected]

Gina [email protected]

D

Page 2: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Introduction

SLD Construct and Policy

Process for Peer Review

Case File Calibration4

3

2

1

Agenda

Page 3: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Purpose & Objectives

• Inform state level guidance on cognitive processing evaluation

• Provide meaningful feedback to school teams to help develop their understanding of the ‘big picture’ of LD identification

• Inform state level training needs for 2013-14 (e-file data collection)

Page 4: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY - 20 U.S.C. § 1401(26)(A); 34 C.F.R. § 300.7(c)(10)

(A) GENERAL - The term means a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in an imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or do mathematical calculations.

(B) DISORDERS INCLUDED - The term includes such conditions as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia and developmental aphasia.

(C) DISORDERS NOT INCLUDED - The term does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities, of mental retardation, of emotional disturbance, or of environmental, cultural or economic disadvantage.

Page 5: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Prep

onde

ranc

e of

Evi

denc

eLowAchievement

Response to Intervention Processing

Class performance

Benchmark Data

ISAT data

Academic Achievement Data

All achievement data

Progress Monitoring Data

Fidelity – do we match intervention to need? Are others making progress?

Qualitative Analysis of Work

Observation

Processing Evaluation – strengths and weaknesses

Hypo

thes

is Te

sting

Data should tell a consistent story about the child’s learning needs.and ensure that exclusionary criteria are considered and effectively ruled out.

Page 6: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Comments about observation (if needed)

Page 7: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Broad Processes that were agreed on during the School Psychologist Symposium:1. Fluid Reasoning2. Crystallized Intelligence3. Visual Processing4. Long-Term Storage and Retrieval5. Auditory Processing6. Processing Speed7. Short Term Memory

Evelyn Johnson
Page 8: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013
Page 9: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013
Page 10: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Case File Calibration

E-file procedure review (Sydney)

Work in teams to complete

Group discussion

Work in your teams4

3

2

1

Page 11: Specific Learning Disability Peer Review 2013

Improving the lives of people who learn differently through prevention, evaluation, treatment, and research.

LPLC 3324 Elder Street • Boise, ID

208-333-0008

www.LPLearningCenter.org