4
Soil Summary 2019-2020 Soil Nutrient Status For this year’s annual soil summary, we have again split our focus on the four different crop categories with data summarised according to the nutrient levels specified in the 9 th Edition of the RB209. The data includes summarised P, K, Mg data for all soil samples submitted between June 2019 and May 2020 along with over 25 years of trended data. This year’s summary also includes details on the importance of trace elements and ensuring you are maximising your crops yield potential. Arable and Forage Soils Grassland Vegetable and Bulb Soils Fruit, Vines and Hops Soils Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils at target value 11% of soils at target value Magnesium Magnesium Magnesium Magnesium 42% of soils at target value 33% of soils at target value 49% of soils at target value 36% of soils at target value > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 Potassium Potassium Potassium Potassium 32% of soils at target value 26% of soils at target value 21% of soils at target value 37% of soils at target value > Index 2- < Index 2- Index 2- > Index 2- < Index 2- Index 2- > Index 2+ < Index 2+ Index 2+ > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 > Index 3 < Index 3 Index 3 > Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2 43% 25% 32% 35% 35% 30% 24% 41% 35% 74% 15% 11% 34% 24% 42% 59% 8% 33% 32% 19% 49% 58% 6% 36% 41% 27% 32% 29% 45% 26% 21% 58% 21% 46% 17% 37%

Soil Nutrient Status Soil Summary 2019-2020 · 2020. 9. 25. · Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus. 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Soil Nutrient Status Soil Summary 2019-2020 · 2020. 9. 25. · Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus. 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils

Soil Summary 2019-2020

Soil Nutrient Status

For this year’s annual soil summary, we have again split our focus on the four different crop categories with data summarised according to the nutrient levels specified in the 9th Edition of the RB209. The data includes summarised P, K, Mg data for all soil samples submitted between June 2019 and May 2020 along with over 25 years of trended data. This year’s summary also includes details on the importance of trace elements and ensuring you are maximising your crops yield potential.

Arable andForage Soils

Grassland Vegetable andBulb Soils

Fruit, Vines andHops Soils

Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus

32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils at target value 11% of soils at target value

Magnesium Magnesium Magnesium Magnesium

42% of soils at target value 33% of soils at target value 49% of soils at target value 36% of soils at target value > Index 2 < Index 2

Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2

Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2

Index 2 > Index 2 < Index 2

Index 2

Potassium Potassium Potassium Potassium

32% of soils at target value 26% of soils at target value 21% of soils at target value 37% of soils at target value > Index 2- < Index 2-

Index 2- > Index 2- < Index 2-

Index 2- > Index 2+ < Index 2+

Index 2+ > Index 2 < Index 2

Index 2

> Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2

> Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2

> Index 3 < Index 3 Index 3

> Index 2 < Index 2 Index 2

43%

25%

32%

35%

35%

30%24%

41%

35%

74% 15%

11%

34%

24%

42%

59%

8%

33%

32%

19%

49%

58%

6%

36%

41%

27%

32% 29%

45%

26% 21%

58%

21%

46%

17%

37%

Page 2: Soil Nutrient Status Soil Summary 2019-2020 · 2020. 9. 25. · Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus. 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils

The Importance of Trace Elements

Even though water makes up around nine tenths of a plant, the elemental nutrient composition of the remaining dry matter plays a vital role in successful growth. Their relative deficiency or excess can affect crop development resulting in lower yield potential and crop profitability.

Applications of bagged fertiliser containing trace elements is not standard practice for many farms. Instead some

nutrients may be applied with the farm sprayer as part of a tank mix, or as a result of applications of organic

material such as FYM. A broad spectrum of trace elements, including copper, iron, manganese, sodium, and zinc

are essential for plant growth.

Liebig introduced his ‘law of minimum’ (below) which

describes crop production as being limited by the nutrient in

shortest supply. For example, once the Nitrogen need of a

crop is met, another element such as Phosphorus potentially

becomes limiting. Liebig’s law demonstrates that in order to

manage a crops nutrition, first you must measure to identify

the limiting factor.

pH 38%

Phosphorous 27%

Potassium 32%

Magnesium 15%

Calcium 44%

Copper 38%

Zinc 46%

Iron 1%

Sulphur 29%

Molybdenum 16%

Manganese 43%

Boron 17%

Nutrient % of samples

deficient

Percentage of soil samples received at

NRM in an 8-year period (2010-2018)

which were indexed as deficient according

to the RB209.

Soil conditions and other growth factors

YIELD

Light

Molybdenum

Manganese

Iron

Boron

Nitrogen

Calcium

Magnesium

Sulphur

Potassium

PhosphorousZinc

Copper

SodiumW

ater

It is not only a deficit nutrient level which can be the limiting factor, excessive levels affect the plants nutrient

balance. Nutrients can behave in both a Synergistic and Antagonistic way. In other words, nutrients can either help

each other to perform their tasks or hinder each other.

Page 3: Soil Nutrient Status Soil Summary 2019-2020 · 2020. 9. 25. · Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus. 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils

Agri-Nutrient Service

Growers today are scrutinising every production cost, with the aim of growing sustainable and more profitable crops. Analysing nutrient levels and understanding any soil deficiencies, enables better management to maximise crop yield potential.

The NRM Agri-Nutrient Service provides a flexible broad-spectrum soil analysis solution that represents great

value. Both the standard UK agricultural extractions, and the Mehlich III universal extraction methods are used

to deliver a service with the usual high standards NRM’s reputation has been built upon.

The broad spectrum Agri-Nutrient Service offers a number of analysis options including pH, P, K, Mg, Na, Ca, Fe,

Zn, Cu, S, Mn, Mo and Co, with the option of adding Organic Matter (LOI), Textural Classification and Boron. This

flexible service represents a vital tool in helping to make informed plant nutrition decisions.

The new style of report displays all the results for a single sample on

one page to make is easier to interpret your nutrient levels. The report

also incorporates some aspects of the standard soil report you may

have seen before.

The standard soil analysis results are displayed as the index (from

RB209 9th Edition) and the nutrient value in mg/l. All other results

are displayed graphically in relation to optimum level.

Each sample report will include

numbered notes which refer

to recommendations given

based on nutrient levels.

The recommendations are

based on either RB209, RB247

or Field Trials depending on

the nutrient.

For further information on the

analytical services that NRM provides,

please contact our customer service

team on 01344 886 338 or by email

at [email protected]

Elements pH P K Mg Na Ca Fe Zn Cu S Mn Mo CoIncluded

Optional Organic Matter (LOI) Textural Classification Hot Water-Soluble BoronExtras

Part of the Cawood Scientifi c Group

NRM Coopers Bridge, Braziers Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6NS

Tel: 01344 886 338 Fax: 01344 890 972 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nrm.uk.com

NRM Laboratories is a division of Cawood Scientifi c Ltd, Coopers Bridge, Braziers Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6NS Registered Number: 05655711

AGRI-NUTRIENT SAVER SERVICE REPORT

Client : A FARMERTOPHILL FARMSOMERSET

Contact : ANALYSED BY COURTESY OF

NRM LABORATORIES

COOPERS BRIDGE

BRAZIERS LANE

BRACKNELLBERKSHIRE RG42 6NS

Tel. : 01344 886338 U 49

Please quote the above code for all enquiries

Sample Matrix : Agricultural Soil

Date Received 23-Apr-20

Date Reported 26-Jul-20

Laboratory Reference

Card Number 88149/20

Sample Number 717760/20

Notes (*)(1) Sodium is a non essential plant nutrient. It is seldom, if ever, deficient except for Sugar Beet and Spinach. No crops show recognisable symptoms of sodium

deficiency. Some crops can respond to sodium fertiliser when the potassium level is just adequate or low. At the level of sodium and potassium found in this

soil, no response to sodium fertiliser would be expected.

(2) Calcium plays an important role in soil fertility and its status is reflected in the pH of the soil. Plants thrive best when the predominant base in the soil is

calcium. If other bases, such as magnesium, potassium or sodium are present in amounts equal to or greater than calcium, nutritional disturbances can occur.

Correction is by application of a calcium based liming material.

(3) Zinc deficiency in UK soils is fairly uncommon. Symptoms may be seen if the spring growing conditions are cool and wet. However, crops sensitive to zinc will

require either a foliar spray or soil application when the soil level is low. Beans, Maize, Fruit Trees (Apples) and Onions have a high response to zinc. Root

Crops (including Potatoes and Sugar Beet), Barley, Strawberries and Tomatoes may be responsive to zinc under certain conditions. Winter Wheat has a low

response to zinc applications and specialist advice should be sought before applying zinc as foliar spray or soil application.

(4) Correlation between the standard method used by NRM for plant available Manganese (DTPA Extractable) and Mehlich III is only significant with a pH of less

than 6.5. In soil samples with a pH of > 6.5 the correlation between the methods is not significant so we recommend caution in the interpretation of these

(5) Very high levels of iron are common in soil, as it is one of the most abundant elements in soils and rocks. High levels are not generally associated with excess

iron availability to the plant but may have implications in the availability of other elements to the growing crop, such as manganese, zinc and copper.

(6) Plants absorb sulphur as the sulphate ion. Sulphates are not retained in the soil, to any great extent, they are soluble and tend to move with the soil water and

are readily leached by high rainfall or irrigation. This is particularly true for low capacity (sandy) soils. Sulphur behaves very much like nitrogen, the

largest pool of sulphur is contained within the organic matter. The sulphate sulphur becomes available to the plant via bacterial breakdown of the organic

matter, atmospheric sulphur and other forms of reduced sulphur. Intensification of agriculture, improved crop varieties, the use of sulphur free fertilisers and

control of atmospheric pollution have aggravated the sulphur deficiency problem. In many UK soils, the distribution of sulphate sulphur may not be consistent

throughout the soil profile. A profile test down to 90cm should be considered before using the soil test levels alone to calculate fertiliser sulphur

requirements. If the soil has relatively high sulphur levels at lower depths, the amounts can be reduced. The best method of building soil sulphur reserves is by

adding organic materials and maintaining an adequate organic matter content. Where satisfactory organic sulphur reserves cannot be maintained, certain

fertilisers or amendments have to be used to supply the crop with its sulphur requirement.

(7) Low molybdenum levels can be caused by low soil pH (less than 5.5) and/or high levels of phosphate. Acid, sandy soils are most affected. Legumes are

particularly susceptible to molybdenum deficiency and plants suffering from low levels of molybdenum will lack vigour and the leaves become light green. The

symptoms are very similar to nitrogen deficiency, however, non legumes will show symptoms of excess nitrate. The leaves develop yellowish areas and may curl or

cup upwards and become distorted. The soil pH should be adjusted (see lime recommendations) to target pH for the crop. This will increase molybdenum

availability. Soil applications or foliar sprays can be used to correct for molybdenum deficiency. The correlation between extractable molybdenum and crop

response is the weakest of all the essential nutrients. Therefore it is recommended that plant tissue analysis is carried out in conjunction with soil analysis.

Mehlich III is not suitable for extracting Mo due to the low pH of the extracting solution. Any results obtained for Mo from this extraction process will

Part of the Cawood Scientifi c Group

NRM Coopers Bridge, Braziers Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6NSTel: 01344 886 338 Fax: 01344 890 972 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nrm.uk.com

NRM Laboratories is a division of Cawood Scientifi c Ltd, Coopers Bridge, Braziers Lane, Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6NS Registered Number: 05655711

AGRI-NUTRIENT SAVER SERVICE REPORT

Client : A FARMERTOPHILL FARMSOMERSET

Contact : ANALYSED BY COURTESY OFNRM LABORATORIESCOOPERS BRIDGEBRAZIERS LANEBRACKNELLBERKSHIRE RG42 6NSTel. : 01344 886338U 49Please quote the above code for all enquiries

Sample Matrix : Agricultural Soil

Date Received 23-Apr-20Date Reported 26-Jul-20

Laboratory ReferenceCard Number 88149/20Sample Number 717759/20

Sample Ref: BIG FIELDSoil pH : 7.3

4 acres Winter Wheat into Winter Wheat

Notes (*)Index Result Deficient Marginal Target Marginal Excessive

Available Phosphate - P mg/l

17.1 2

Available Potash - K mg/l

49 0

Available Magnesium mg/l

174 3

Ammonium Nitrate Extractable Sodium mg/l110.01

Ammonium Nitrate Extractable Calcium mg/l480.02

Mehlich III Extractable Copper mg/l

3.6Mehlich III Extractable Zinc mg/l

3.03Mehlich III Extractable Manganese mg/l

20.14Mehlich III Extractable Iron mg/l

222.05Mehlich III Extractable Sulphate mg/l

40.46Mehlich III Extractable Molybdenum mg/l

<0.57Mehlich III Extractable Cobalt mg/l

0.38Estimated Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g

7.99(*) See notes pages

Page 4: Soil Nutrient Status Soil Summary 2019-2020 · 2020. 9. 25. · Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus Phosphorus. 32% of soils at target value 30% of soils at target value 35% of soils

Trends in pH, P, K, & Mg 1994 – 2020:

Grass samplesArable samples

For further information on the analytical services that NRM provides to the agricultural sector please contact our customer service team on 01344 886 338 or by email at [email protected]

Trend in mean Mg

Year

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

pH

Trend in mean pH

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

P (m

g/l)

Trend in mean P

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

K (m

g/l)

Trend in mean K

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

Mg

(mg/

l)

Trend in mean Mg

Trend in mean P

Year

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

pH

Trend in mean pH

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

P (m

g/l)

Trend in mean P

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

K (m

g/l)

Trend in mean K

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

Mg

(mg/

l)

Trend in mean Mg

Trend in mean pH

Year

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

pH

Trend in mean pH

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

P (m

g/l)

Trend in mean P

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

K (m

g/l)

Trend in mean K

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

Mg

(mg/

l)

Trend in mean Mg

Trend in mean K

Year

5.00

5.50

6.00

6.50

7.00

7.50

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

pH

Trend in mean pH

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

P (m

g/l)

Trend in mean P

100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

K (m

g/l)

Trend in mean K

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

94/9

5

95/9

6

96/9

7

97/9

8

98/9

9

99/0

0

00/0

1

01/0

2

02/0

3

03/0

4

04/0

5

05/0

6

06/0

7

07/0

8

08/0

9

09/1

0

10/1

1

11/1

2

12/1

3

13/1

4

14/1

5

15/1

6

16/1

7

17/1

8

18/1

9

19/2

0

Soil

Mg

(mg/

l)

Trend in mean Mg

NRM Laboratories Coopers Bridge, Braziers Lane,Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6NSTel: 01344 886 338 Fax: 01344 890 972

Email: [email protected] www.cawoodscientific.uk.com/nrm