12
Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism.

Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Social Learning Theory

The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism.

Page 2: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Main Assumptions

Behaviour is learnt from a combination of others’ behaviour and expectation of reinforcement or punishment for copying what is seen.

It combines principles from the behaviourist and cognitive approaches.

Imitation of others’ is a key idea.

Page 3: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Similarities of SLT to the other approaches.

Behaviourist Approach Cognitive Approach

Similarities to SLT

Role of reinforcementBehaviour learnt

Role of cognitive processesFocus on human behaviour rather than animals

Differences from SLT

Importance of expectancySLT looks FWD while Behaviourism looks BWDDistinction between learning and performance in SLT, while they are the same for behaviourismAnimals not seen as the same as humans

Observational learning not part of the cognitive approachCognitive concentrates on processes like schemasSLT still tends to focus on external behaviour, while cognitive approach interested in internal processes

Page 4: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Principles of SLT Bandura explains learning as more complex

than the STIMULUS-RESPONSE approach of behaviourism. Playing down classical conditioning and reflexes, he emphasised two parts to learning:

Observational Learning Expectancy

Page 5: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Observational Learning

This is learning of behaviour from observing the behaviours of others and then imitating it, or, in the case of children, learning through identification. However, imitation is not automatic.

Page 6: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Expectancy Behaviour will only be copied if there

is an expectancy of reinforcement for doing so. A child, for example, watches an aggressive adult winning a fight. This sets in the child’s mind the expectancy of winning by using aggression and the child copies the aggression for this reason. This means that cognitive processes are involved in the SLT.

Page 7: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Cognitive processes involved

Attention Retention Reproduction Motivation

Page 8: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Not all models are copied, it depends on certain issues:

Appropriateness Relevance Similarity Warmth and Friendliness The model having power Admiration Consistency

Page 9: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Differences between SLT and Operant Conditioning

In SLT behaviour is only informed by reinforcement. In behaviourism, behaviour determined by reinforcement.

SLT works FWD, Behaviourism works BWD

Behaviourism dismisses Cognitive Processes. SLT bring in Memory and Attention.

Page 10: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

The Bobo Doll Experiment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCETgT_Xfzg&feature=related

Page 11: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Strengths

Adds cognitive processes to behaviourist principles

Based on lab experiments Less deterministic and reductionist Good at explaining specific imitated

behaviour Explains development of culture and

complex behaviours

Page 12: Social Learning Theory The bridge between Behaviourism and cognitivism

Limitations

Doesn’t explain how cognitive processes work

Still concentrates mostly on external behaviour

Lab experiments are artificial Criticisms of Bobo Doll studies Not good at explaining learning of

abstract ideas