57
Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 1

Stewards’ Consultation

September 1, 2005

Page 2: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 2

Welcome

Page 3: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 3 Morning AgendaMorning Agenda

10:3010:30 Welcome,Welcome, Damian BassettDamian Bassett

Blue Box Program Plan Updates & Blue Box Program Plan Updates & Amendments, Amendments, Derek StephensonDerek Stephenson

Proposed 2006 Program Rules, Proposed 2006 Program Rules, Gordon DayGordon Day

Q&A on Updates/Amendments & 2006 RulesQ&A on Updates/Amendments & 2006 Rules

2006 Stewards’ Fees, 2006 Stewards’ Fees, Guy PerryGuy Perry

Consultation & Further Amendments to Consultation & Further Amendments to BBPP, BBPP, Derek StephensonDerek Stephenson

Q&A on Stewards’ Fees & Further Q&A on Stewards’ Fees & Further AmendmentsAmendments

12:3012:30 Lunch (Webcast suspended)Lunch (Webcast suspended)

Page 4: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 4

Today’s InstructionsToday’s Instructions

New participants in all stakeholder groupsNew participants in all stakeholder groups Webcast available in archives – 180 daysWebcast available in archives – 180 days 22ndnd audience listening on-line audience listening on-line

we’ll note the number as we change slideswe’ll note the number as we change slides email questions/comments email questions/comments from your regular from your regular

email program email program to the address below to the address below

[email protected]

Page 5: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 5

Consultation Process & TimingConsultation Process & Timing

SeptemberSeptember

Presentation of proposed feesPresentation of proposed fees 11

Deadline for comments, 5 p.m. to Deadline for comments, 5 p.m. to [email protected]@stewardshipontario.ca

1212

Stewardship Ontario Board for approvalStewardship Ontario Board for approval

If approved, forward to next WDO If approved, forward to next WDO board meetingboard meeting

1919

Next WDO meetingNext WDO meeting

If approved, forward to MinisterIf approved, forward to Minister2828

Page 6: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 6

Blue Box Program PlanUpdate & Amendments

Derek Stephenson

Page 7: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 7

BBPP Update: 2005 Program YearBBPP Update: 2005 Program Year

First full calendar year for programFirst full calendar year for program Met all legal requirements under WDAMet all legal requirements under WDA On track for:On track for:

$51.3M direct payments to municipalities$51.3M direct payments to municipalities approved $5.1M in competitive grants to approved $5.1M in competitive grants to

improve effectiveness & efficiency of improve effectiveness & efficiency of municipal programsmunicipal programs

direct administration costs less than 5% of direct administration costs less than 5% of program costprogram cost

Page 8: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 8

BBPP Update: 2005 Program YearBBPP Update: 2005 Program Year

Successfully negotiated cost containment Successfully negotiated cost containment plan with AMO plan with AMO

$2.5M investment in new glass market $2.5M investment in new glass market development approveddevelopment approved

Received & processed 2,000 reports from Received & processed 2,000 reports from stewardsstewards

500+ 500+ potentialpotential additional additional stewards stewards identified but not yet reportedidentified but not yet reported

Page 9: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 9

BBPP Update: 2005 Program YearBBPP Update: 2005 Program Year

First charges have been laid under Act: First charges have been laid under Act: failure to reportfailure to report failure to pay feesfailure to pay fees both company & officers chargedboth company & officers charged

Completed first on-site audits of steward Completed first on-site audits of steward reportsreports

Page 10: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 10

Original BBPP projected 815,000 tonnes Original BBPP projected 815,000 tonnes recycled & municipal payments of $54M recycled & municipal payments of $54M by 2004by 2004

End 2004 results: 824,000 tonnes recycled End 2004 results: 824,000 tonnes recycled & municipal payments of $55.5M& municipal payments of $55.5M

BBPP Update: 2005 Program YearBBPP Update: 2005 Program Year

Page 11: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 11

Amendments to BBPP for 2006Amendments to BBPP for 2006

Minister’s decision on in-kind payments for Minister’s decision on in-kind payments for CNA/OCNA members with regards to their CNA/OCNA members with regards to their obligations to municipalitiesobligations to municipalities

Cost containment strategy including Cost containment strategy including agreements with AMO on reasonable cost agreements with AMO on reasonable cost bands & municipal administration costs bands & municipal administration costs

Page 12: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 12

Amendments to BBPP for 2006Amendments to BBPP for 2006

Minister’s requirement that Stewardship Minister’s requirement that Stewardship Ontario & WDO administration costs be Ontario & WDO administration costs be cappedcapped no more thanno more than 5% of total program costs5% of total program costs

Minister’s direction on voluntary stewardsMinister’s direction on voluntary stewards

Page 13: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 13

Amendments to BBPP for 2006Amendments to BBPP for 2006

Revised Stewardship Ontario governance Revised Stewardship Ontario governance model (when approved by Minister)model (when approved by Minister)

Changes to program rulesChanges to program rules 2006 fee rates2006 fee rates

Page 14: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 14

Proposed 2006 Program Rules

Gordon Day

Page 15: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 15

BackgroundBackground Rules changed annually:Rules changed annually:

update fee rates & datesupdate fee rates & dates improve clarityimprove clarity address shortcomingsaddress shortcomings

Board is considering three changes to Board is considering three changes to Rules for which they would like stewards Rules for which they would like stewards to provide commentto provide comment

Page 16: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 16

Today’s Rules PresentationToday’s Rules Presentation

Copy of proposed 2006 Rules providedCopy of proposed 2006 Rules provided Changes to Rules denoted in 1 of 3 ways:Changes to Rules denoted in 1 of 3 ways:

UnderlineUnderline: annual change: annual change Bold ItalicsBold Italics: new additions; for your : new additions; for your

information onlyinformation only Boxed: 3 boxed sections; changes for Boxed: 3 boxed sections; changes for

commentcomment

Page 17: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 17 Brand Owner Definition – Brand Owner Definition – What has been our experience?What has been our experience?

Many business models in placeMany business models in place some not clearly covered by Rulessome not clearly covered by Rules

Licensing arrangements wide-spreadLicensing arrangements wide-spread resulting in 2 possible “brand owners” in Ontarioresulting in 2 possible “brand owners” in Ontario

Need to assign obligationNeed to assign obligation must be logical, clear, fair & meet intent of programmust be logical, clear, fair & meet intent of program

Companies who have organized corporate Companies who have organized corporate structure for other purposes - exempt from fees structure for other purposes - exempt from fees related to Designated Blue Box Waste (DBBW)related to Designated Blue Box Waste (DBBW)

#1

Page 18: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 18

Proposed Changes – Brand OwnerProposed Changes – Brand Owner

Recognize that trademark owner & Recognize that trademark owner & licensee may both reside in Ontariolicensee may both reside in Ontario

Clarifies “Private Label” manufacturers not Clarifies “Private Label” manufacturers not classified as licenseeclassified as licensee

#1

Page 19: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 19

Proposed Changes – Brand OwnerProposed Changes – Brand Owner

In event of 2 brand owners in Ontario, obligation In event of 2 brand owners in Ontario, obligation assigned to party “more directly connected to assigned to party “more directly connected to production of DBBW, except Franchisor who production of DBBW, except Franchisor who shall be the steward.”shall be the steward.”

Reinforce that Franchisor is Brand Owner of Reinforce that Franchisor is Brand Owner of DBBWDBBW

Add “any person whose corporate name or Add “any person whose corporate name or business name registration includes trademark.”business name registration includes trademark.”

#1

Page 20: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 20

Impact of Proposed ChangeImpact of Proposed Change

Close gaps in current RulesClose gaps in current Rules currently exploited by small number of companiescurrently exploited by small number of companies

Clarifies obligation in case of trademark owner & Clarifies obligation in case of trademark owner & licenseelicensee

Captures companies registered in Ontario who Captures companies registered in Ontario who benefit from sale of products, but do not meet benefit from sale of products, but do not meet current test of residencycurrent test of residency

#1

Page 21: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 21 Designation of Steward – Designation of Steward – What has been our experience?What has been our experience?

Confusion around who is obligated for “service Confusion around who is obligated for “service packaging,” specifically unbranded packagingpackaging,” specifically unbranded packaging

Previous “franchisee supply” rule confusing to Previous “franchisee supply” rule confusing to understand & difficult to monitorunderstand & difficult to monitor created un-level playing field within certain sectorscreated un-level playing field within certain sectors

Most franchisees under sales or 15 tonne Most franchisees under sales or 15 tonne threshold threshold

Franchisor owns trademark & benefits from sale Franchisor owns trademark & benefits from sale of products with trademarkof products with trademark

#2

Page 22: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 22 Proposed Changes – Proposed Changes – Designation of StewardsDesignation of Stewards

Add “Service Packaging” to defined termsAdd “Service Packaging” to defined terms Include “Service Packaging” to Brand Include “Service Packaging” to Brand

Owner, First Importer & Franchisor Owner, First Importer & Franchisor designationdesignation

Add new section (iv) to capture “Any Add new section (iv) to capture “Any person who delivers Service Packaging to person who delivers Service Packaging to consumers in Ontario” consumers in Ontario” to cover mail order/internet shoppingto cover mail order/internet shopping

#2

Page 23: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 23 Proposed Changes – Proposed Changes – Designation of StewardsDesignation of Stewards

In a franchise system, Franchisor owns In a franchise system, Franchisor owns brand & trademarkbrand & trademark consistent with Minister’s direction & rules for consistent with Minister’s direction & rules for

other stewardsother stewards

Franchisor will be responsible for all Franchisor will be responsible for all DBBW within their franchise systemDBBW within their franchise system

#2

Page 24: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 24

Impact of Proposed ChangeImpact of Proposed Change

Improves clarity around Service PackagingImproves clarity around Service Packaging including mail order/internet shopping companiesincluding mail order/internet shopping companies

Levels playing field for franchise operationsLevels playing field for franchise operations obligations consistent across similar competitorsobligations consistent across similar competitors

Increases number of franchisors obligated to Increases number of franchisors obligated to report & pay fees report & pay fees

Reduces quantity of exempted DBBWReduces quantity of exempted DBBW

#2

Page 25: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 25 Steward Exemptions – Steward Exemptions – What has been our experience?What has been our experience?

Two tonnage thresholds confusing & Two tonnage thresholds confusing & raises questions about fairness of raises questions about fairness of programprogram

Some stewards attempt to report Some stewards attempt to report business operations separately to avoid business operations separately to avoid obligationsobligations

#3

Page 26: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 26 Proposed Changes – Proposed Changes – Steward ExemptionsSteward Exemptions

Remove 75,000 kilogram (kg) threshold Remove 75,000 kilogram (kg) threshold exemption for newspapersexemption for newspapers

Resulting in only one 15,000 kg weight Resulting in only one 15,000 kg weight exemption for all DBBWexemption for all DBBW

Clarify weight exemption test in (ii) to Clarify weight exemption test in (ii) to include “the steward and its Affiliates” as include “the steward and its Affiliates” as currently applies in (i) sales exemptioncurrently applies in (i) sales exemption

#3

Page 27: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 27

Impact of Proposed ChangeImpact of Proposed Change One consistent & clear weight exemption One consistent & clear weight exemption Clearly defined 15,000 kg applies to Clearly defined 15,000 kg applies to

steward & Affiliates steward & Affiliates net impact will reduce number of exempted net impact will reduce number of exempted

stewardsstewards

Handful of exempt OCNA stewards will be Handful of exempt OCNA stewards will be obligatedobligated however financial impact would be <$150/yrhowever financial impact would be <$150/yr

#3

Page 28: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 28

Other Important ChangeOther Important Change

Reporting & payment schedule added as Reporting & payment schedule added as Schedule CSchedule C

Stewardship Ontario moving to quarterly Stewardship Ontario moving to quarterly payment schedule as originally plannedpayment schedule as originally planned

Reporting deadline remains March 31Reporting deadline remains March 31stst First payment of 25% in 2006 obligation due First payment of 25% in 2006 obligation due

March 31March 31stst penalty & interest if payment received after penalty & interest if payment received after March 31March 31stst last quarter payment due last quarter payment due December 1, 2006December 1, 2006

Page 29: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 29

Questions & Answers

[email protected]

Page 30: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 30

2006 Stewards’ Fees

Guy Perry

Page 31: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 31

Topics to CoverTopics to Cover

Basis for calculating 2006 fees Basis for calculating 2006 fees Proposed 2006 Stewards FeesProposed 2006 Stewards Fees Next stepsNext steps

Page 32: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 32

Blue Box Stewards FeesBlue Box Stewards Fees

Total industry cost downTotal industry cost down

~$~$61.261.2M for 2006 vs. $64.3M for 2005 (~5%)M for 2006 vs. $64.3M for 2005 (~5%)

~$~$74.374.3/tonne for 2006 vs. $82.5/tonne for 2005 /tonne for 2006 vs. $82.5/tonne for 2005 (~10%)(~10%)

Page 33: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 33

Cost ContainmentCost Containment

Negotiated cost containment strategy with Negotiated cost containment strategy with municipalities:municipalities: apply “reasonable cost bands” based on better apply “reasonable cost bands” based on better

performing programsperforming programs instituted performance measure as basis for instituted performance measure as basis for

paymentspayments reduction in Blue Box System cost of $24M over next reduction in Blue Box System cost of $24M over next

two yearstwo years cap municipal administration costcap municipal administration cost payment to best practice costs in 2008payment to best practice costs in 2008

Page 34: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 34 Agreed Net Blue Box CostAgreed Net Blue Box Cost

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

2001 2002 2003 2004

Municipal Reporting Year

Net

co

st (

mil

lio

n $

)

Net Cost (actual gross cost less 3-year average revenue)

Agreed Net Cost

Page 35: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 35

* Due to difference in reported sales quantities & generation * Due to difference in reported sales quantities & generation estimates used to calculate previous years’ feesestimates used to calculate previous years’ fees

Key Elements of FeesKey Elements of Fees

Payments to Municipalities

91%

Program Delivery, MOE Enforcement &

WDO Charges5%

Administration & Start-up

3%

Anticipated Shortfall *

1%

Page 36: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 36

Key Elements of Fees: Generation RatesKey Elements of Fees: Generation Rates

Generation estimates largely based on waste Generation estimates largely based on waste composition audits & some industry datacomposition audits & some industry data

Used last year generation ratesUsed last year generation rates accounting for population growth (1.26%)accounting for population growth (1.26%) extensive waste audit program underway, but extensive waste audit program underway, but

incomplete incomplete As for 2005, used most recent stewards’ data for As for 2005, used most recent stewards’ data for

newsprint, telephone directories, paint cans & newsprint, telephone directories, paint cans & LCBO glass packagingLCBO glass packaging these represent more reliable generation figures than these represent more reliable generation figures than

waste audit resultswaste audit results

Page 37: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 37

Taken from 2004 annual municipal datacall reported by WDOTaken from 2004 annual municipal datacall reported by WDO

Overall recovery up ~6% from 779,843 tonnes to 823,627 tonnes

Recovery RatesRecovery Rates

200

2

200

2

200

2

200

2

200

2

200

2

200

3

200

3

200

3

200

3

200

3

200

3

200

4

200

4

200

4

200

4

200

4

200

4

0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

Printed Paper Paper-basedPackaging

Plastics Aluminum Steel Glass

Re

co

ve

ry R

ate

(%

)

Page 38: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 38

Gross CostsGross Costs

Reported by WDO from 2004 municipal datacallReported by WDO from 2004 municipal datacall up ~ 6.5% from $182.4M to $194.4Mup ~ 6.5% from $182.4M to $194.4M includes interest on municipal capital ($4.2M)includes interest on municipal capital ($4.2M)

deferred to 2006 negotiated as part of cost containment deferred to 2006 negotiated as part of cost containment strategystrategy

Use material specific costs from last year’s Use material specific costs from last year’s allocation study allocation study conditions not changed substantially across provinceconditions not changed substantially across province

preliminary work underway to address implementation of preliminary work underway to address implementation of single-stream recycling & combined recycling & organics single-stream recycling & combined recycling & organics collection in Torontocollection in Toronto

Page 39: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 39

RevenueRevenue

Reported by municipalities to WDOReported by municipalities to WDO

$83.7M in 2004 from $65.6M in 2003$83.7M in 2004 from $65.6M in 2003

3-year average (used for obligation)3-year average (used for obligation)

$73.6M for 2006 fees from $64.9M$73.6M for 2006 fees from $64.9M

Relative prices will affect relative net costs & Relative prices will affect relative net costs & allocation among materialsallocation among materials

Page 40: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 40 Industry Share of Blue Box CostIndustry Share of Blue Box Cost

Municipal$58.78M

Municipal$55.46M

Industry$55.46M

Cost Band $10M

Industry$58.78M

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

2003 2004

Pro

gra

m C

ost

(m

illio

ns

of

$)

Total $117.55 M Total $120.92 M

Page 41: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 41

On Track with Program Plan On Track with Program Plan

Compared to original Blue Box Program Compared to original Blue Box Program Plan . . .Plan . . .for 2004:for 2004: plan forecast 814,700 tonnes to be recovered plan forecast 814,700 tonnes to be recovered

with an industry obligation of $54M with an industry obligation of $54M actual recovery was higher at 823,600 tonnes actual recovery was higher at 823,600 tonnes

with an industry obligation of $55.5Mwith an industry obligation of $55.5M

Page 42: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 42

Allocation FactorsAllocation Factors

No change to the funding formula for 2006No change to the funding formula for 2006 same allocation factors & weightingsame allocation factors & weighting

recovery rate – 40%recovery rate – 40% net cost – 40%net cost – 40% equalization – 20%equalization – 20%

Page 43: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 43 Program Delivery Costs for Program Delivery Costs for Market DevelopmentMarket Development

2003/2004 fees 2003/2004 fees $2.5M for glass $2.5M for glass 2005 fees 2005 fees $100K for plastics $100K for plastics

preliminary market development underwaypreliminary market development underway

For 2006:For 2006: no additional market development feesno additional market development fees

glass & plastics work ongoing & progress glass & plastics work ongoing & progress continues toward 60% diversion goalcontinues toward 60% diversion goal

this will be reviewed on an annual basisthis will be reviewed on an annual basis

Page 44: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 44 Program Delivery, Admin & Start-upProgram Delivery, Admin & Start-up

Start-up$0.89M

Administration$1.17M

Direct Program Delivery$1.93M

WDO Charges & MOE Enforcement

$1.20M

Total: $5.2M

Page 45: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 45

Difference between tonnes reported by stewards & estimates used for previous years fees

Stewards Reports vs. Fee EstimatesStewards Reports vs. Fee Estimates

Packaging & Printed Paper Packaging & Printed Paper Generation For 2004 FeesGeneration For 2004 Fees

20%

40%

60%

100%

1,285,000 tonnes

1,578,500 tonnes80%

Estimated Generation for 2004 Fees

Stewards Reports

Page 46: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 46

Revenue Against TargetRevenue Against Target

For 2003/2004For 2003/2004 Previously estimated $1.1MPreviously estimated $1.1M

Board decision to spread over 3 years Board decision to spread over 3 years pay $369K each year pay $369K each year Actual $1.6M (as of Dec. 31 2004)Actual $1.6M (as of Dec. 31 2004)

higher re-filing, lower new stewardshigher re-filing, lower new stewards

For 2005For 2005 Additional 2003/2004 fees & interest of $635K in 2005Additional 2003/2004 fees & interest of $635K in 2005 Projected net shortfall at Dec. 31 2005 of $1.15MProjected net shortfall at Dec. 31 2005 of $1.15M

Recovery in 2006 FeesRecovery in 2006 Fees 50% ($575K) in 2006 fees50% ($575K) in 2006 fees

Page 47: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 47Proposed Fee Rates Printed PaperProposed Fee Rates Printed Paper

Material2005 Fees

(¢/kg)

Proposed 2006 Fees

(¢/kg)Change

CNA/OCNA Newsprint 0.076 0.182

Non-CNA/OCNA Newsprint 0.786 0.757

Magazines & Catalogue 0.862 1.522

Telephone Directories 1.302 1.213

Other Printed Paper 9.029 7.668

Page 48: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 48

Material2005 Fees

(¢/kg)

Proposed 2006 Fees

(¢/kg)Change

Paper Packaging 7.904 7.673

Plastics 13.907 13.556

Steel 4.745 4.601

Aluminum Food & Beverage Cans

-1.093 -0.476

Foil & Other Aluminum 5.502 3.577

Glass 4.003 3.41

Proposed Fee Rates PackagingProposed Fee Rates Packaging

Page 49: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 49

Looking Forward to 2007Looking Forward to 2007

Cost Pressures: Cost Pressures: further increases in recovery further increases in recovery cost of living & program changescost of living & program changes capital investmentcapital investment increase in municipal administration allowance increase in municipal administration allowance

to 3% & 5% to 3% & 5% commodity prices & revenuecommodity prices & revenue

Negotiated cost band for 2007 Negotiated cost band for 2007 $14M reduction $14M reduction Ongoing cost containment work & Ongoing cost containment work &

implementation of E&E Fundimplementation of E&E Fund

Page 50: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 50

Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPP

Derek Stephenson

Page 51: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 51 Consultation on Further Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPPAmendments to BBPP

Fee setting methodology; options include:Fee setting methodology; options include: revise current allocation factor weightingsrevise current allocation factor weightings modify the allocation factorsmodify the allocation factors alternative fee setting approachesalternative fee setting approaches

Aggregation/dis-aggregation of material Aggregation/dis-aggregation of material typestypes aggregation of paper gradesaggregation of paper grades dis-aggregation of packaging gradesdis-aggregation of packaging grades

Page 52: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 52 Consultation on Further Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPPAmendments to BBPP

Base year data to be used for 2007 fee Base year data to be used for 2007 fee setting purposessetting purposes use previous year steward reports for Blue use previous year steward reports for Blue

Box generation estimatesBox generation estimates harmonization with other provinces harmonization with other provinces

(e.g. reporting years)(e.g. reporting years)

Page 53: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 53 Consultation on Further Consultation on Further Amendments to BBPPAmendments to BBPP

Harmonize de minimis levels for all Harmonize de minimis levels for all stewardsstewards

Page 54: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 54

Process & TimingProcess & Timing

SeptemberSeptember Strike sub-committee of Board (including Strike sub-committee of Board (including representation from Technical & Policy Advisory representation from Technical & Policy Advisory committees under new governance model)committees under new governance model)

OctoberOctober Develop options paper for Board approval for Develop options paper for Board approval for consultationconsultation

NovemberNovember Circulate paper to stewards & other key Circulate paper to stewards & other key stakeholdersstakeholders

Hold public consultation meeting to review optionsHold public consultation meeting to review options

DecemberDecember Preliminary recommendations reviewed by Board Preliminary recommendations reviewed by Board sub-committee sub-committee

Page 55: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 55

2007 Fees – Jan. to Sept.2007 Fees – Jan. to Sept.

JanuaryJanuary Board review of sub-committee recommendations Board review of sub-committee recommendations

FebruaryFebruary Second public meeting on Board draft positionsSecond public meeting on Board draft positions

Stewardship Ontario Board approval of agreed Stewardship Ontario Board approval of agreed amendments to BBPPamendments to BBPP

MarchMarch WDO review & approval of proposed amendmentsWDO review & approval of proposed amendments

JuneJune Target date for Minister approval of amendmentsTarget date for Minister approval of amendments

JulyJuly Target date for consultation on 2007 feesTarget date for consultation on 2007 fees

August/ August/ SeptemberSeptember

WDO approval of 2007 fees & BBPP amendmentsWDO approval of 2007 fees & BBPP amendments

Page 56: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 56

Questions & Answers

[email protected]

Page 57: Slide 1 Stewards’ Consultation September 1, 2005

Slide 57

Lunch

Webcast Resumes at 1:30