arX

iv:1

203.

0638

v1 [

cond

-mat

.str

-el]

3 M

ar 2

012

Skyrmion Generation by Current

Youngbin Tchoe1 and Jung Hoon Han2, 3, ∗

1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea2Department of Physics and BK21 Physics Research Division,

Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea3Asia Pacific Center for Theoretical Physics, POSTECH, Pohang, Gyeongbuk 790-784, Korea

(Dated: July 30, 2018)

Skyrmions, once a hypothesized field-theoretical object believed to describe the nature of ele-mentary particles, became common sightings in recent years among several non-centrosymmetricmetallic ferromagnets. For more practical applications of Skyrmionic matter as carriers of informa-tion, thus realizing the prospect of “Skyrmionics”, it is necessary to have the means to create andmanipulate Skyrmions individually. We show through extensive simulation of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation that a circulating current imparted to the metallic chiral ferromagnetic system cancreate isolated Skyrmionic spin texture without the aid of external magnetic field.

PACS numbers: 73.43.Cd, 72.25.-b, 72.80.-r

I. INTRODUCTION

Skyrmions are topological configurations of a vectororder parameter in field-theoretical systems, whose exis-tence had been anticipated mathematically by the par-ticle physicist Tony Skyrme for half a century1. Thetwo-dimensional version of it, sometimes known as thebaby Skyrmion, was recognized to be the topological so-lution of the non-linear sigma model, which serves as amodel for ferromagnets in two dimensions2. The dis-covery of two-dimensional Skyrmions took place in avariety of condensed matter systems such as quantumHall ferromagnets3,4, metallic chiral ferromagnets5–8,as well as the ferromagnetic monolayer9 and dopedantiferromanget10, and is predicted to be possible intwo-dimensional liquid crystal systems11. A series ofmetallic magnets of B20 structure including MnSi5,Fe1−xCoxSi

6,7, and FeGe8 is now known to host theSkyrmionic magnetic texture. In these magnetic mate-rials the formation of Skyrmions is a consequence of thecompetitive interplay between the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya(DM) interaction which tends to induce magnetic spirals,and an external magnetic field which tends to bring abouta ferromagnetic background12,13. Initial theoretical con-sideration assumed a layered structure of Skyrmions em-bedded in a three-dimensional crystal and found a smallregion for its stability just below the magnetic orderingtransition temperature5,12. Later, Monte Carlo simula-tion for two-dimensional magnetic model showed a muchwider region for its existence extending down nearly tozero temperature7,14, as was indeed verified in experi-ment on a thin-film Fe0.5Co0.5Si

7, due to the lack ofcompeting magnetic structures in the thin-film geometry.Upon increasing the thickness of the film, the Skyrmionphase gradually moves to a higher temperature regime8.Aside from their fundamental scientific allure, it is of

importance now to ask if these novel topological objectscan be manipulated to the extent that they can be usedas carriers of charge, spin, and of information in gen-eral. Applying external magnetic field to a chiral ferro-

magnet generates a lattice of Skyrmions, or a Skyrmioncrystal5–8. Spin wave fluctuations can be induced in theSkyrmion crystal by applying an additional ac magneticfield as was recently studied theoretically15,16. Otherthan by magnetic field, the Skyrmions can be manipu-lated through the Hund’s rule coupling of the spin ofelectrons in the metallic host to the localized momentsforming the Skyrmionic texture. Recent demonstrationof the rotation of the Skyrmion crystal axis by the ap-plied current17,18 is an example of this kind. In the ab-sence of pinning, Skyrmions are expected to move withthe velocity equal to the drift velocity of the electrons re-sponsible for the current19. Gilbert damping modifies theSkyrmion trajectory in such a way to induce Hall-like mo-tion of Skyrmion orthogonal to the current direction19.Although various aspects of current-induced motion

of Skyrmions have been studied theoretically in a num-ber of papers already18,19, the possibility of generatingSkyrmions by the current has not been addressed yet.From a technological point of view, it is desirable to havethe extra means to generate and destroy Skyrmions oneat a time, instead of having to generate them only in theform of a crystal by the external field. Such possibility,once realized, will help usher the era of “Skyrmionics”- an effort to tailor Skyrmions as carriers of informa-tion bits. In this article, using extensive simulation ofLandau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation, we provide ev-idence that circulating spin current can couple to localmagnetic moments to produce Skyrmion spin texture inthe latter. Basic theory and LLG equation are introducedin Sec. II. Numerical findings are given in Sec. III. Pos-sibility of experimental realization will be discussed inSec. IV.

II. FORMULATION

We imagine a thin slab of chiral ferromagnet, such thatall degrees of freedom behave identically along the thick-ness direction. The dynamics of the localized moments

2

n are governed by the Hamiltonian7,19

Hn =J

2a

∫

d3r∑

µ=x,y

(∂µn) · (∂µn)

+D

a2

∫

d3r n ·∇× n− 1

a3

∫

d3r B · n.(1)

Formulated in the continuum, a expresses the linear di-mension of the suitably chosen unit cell, while J and Dare the ferromagnetic and DM exchange energies, respec-tively. The Zeeman field B is typically applied perpen-dicular to the planar direction,B = Bz. The dynamics ofthe conduction electrons and the coupling of their spinsto the local moment, on the other hand, are embodied inthe sd Hamiltonian,

Hsd =

∫

d3r Ψ†

(

p2

2m− JHσ · n

)

Ψ, Ψ =

(

c↑c↓

)

. (2)

Electron operators are given in the spinor form Ψ com-prising up (c↑) and down (c↓) spin components. Deriva-tion of the subsequent equation of motion of n based onthe total Hamiltonian H = Hn+Hsd is well-documentedin the literature20 and reproduced briefly here.In the large Hund’s coupling limit (JH → ∞) the spin

Ψ†σΨ of the conduction electron is forced to align with

the local magnetization direction n while the electronband with anti-parallel spins forms a higher-energy con-tinuum. The idea is implemented by making the unitarytransformation, U †n · σU = σz, where U is given by

U =

(

z1 z∗2z2 −z∗1

)

, z1 = cosθ

2, z2 = eiφ sin

θ

2. (3)

The spinor z =

(

z1z2

)

forms the CP1 representation of the

classical spin n = z†σz = (sin θ cosφ, sin θ sinφ, cos θ).The new electron spinor U †Ψ has the upper (lower) com-ponent parallel (anti-parallel) to n, out of which wechoose to keep the upper one only, denoted ψ. The fieldoperator ψ gives the electron whose spin direction is pro-jected strictly parallel to the local moment n. The Hamil-tonian for ψ is

H ′sd =

∫

d3r ψ† [p+ ha]2

2mψ, (4)

where the gauge field a is derived from z as ai = −iz†∂iz.It is gauge-invariant under z → eiχz, and ψ → e−iχψ.Expanding the sd Hamiltonian gives the coupling of localmoment to the electrons as20

Ha−j =

∫

d3r

(

ha · j+ h2ρ

2ma2

)

, (5)

where we also introduced paramagnetic spin current j

and the spin density ρ as20

j =1

2m

(

ψ†[pψ]− [pψ†]ψ)

,

ρ = ψ†ψ. (6)

We focus on the dynamics of the local moments usingHn + Ha−j as the total Hamiltonian and ask how anexternally imposed spin current pattern j influences themagnetic dynamics. Already the likelihood of Skyrmioninduction by the circulating j can be seen in the followingsimple argument. In a steady state, the divergence ofthe current vanishes, ∇ · j = 0, making it possible to re-write j as the curl j = ∇ × c. For circulating current ofcylindrically symmetric form, the vector field c is directedin the z-direction. Integrating the energy functional byparts, one can re-write a · j ∼ −c · ∇ × a and find theeffective magnetic field (∇ × a)z couples linearly to thecurrent source c. This effective magnetic field is nothingother than the Skyrmion density through the relation

(∇× a)z =1

2n · (∂xn× ∂yn). (7)

A suitable c (j) of sufficient strength will overcome thenucleation energy cost and induce a Skyrmion with (∇×a)z 6= 0. The sign dictates that the creation of Skyrmion,Q > 0, is energetically preferred for counter-clockwise(CCW) direction of spin current, while anti-Skyrmions,Q < 0, are preferred for clockwise (CW) spin currentdirection. Here

Q =1

4π

∫

d2r n · (∂xn× ∂yn) (8)

is the total Skyrmion charge.The real-time action for the magnetic dynamics is

hS

a3

∫

d3rdt (1− cos θ)∂tφ−∫

dt(

Hn +Ha−j

)

(9)

with the effective moment S, and (θ, φ) are the polar andazimuthal angles of the magnetization unit vector n. TheLLG equation follows as

n+1

hn×

(

−Ja2∇2n+ 2Da∇× n−B)

+ αn× n+a3

S(j ·∇)n = 0. (10)

The Gilbert damping constant α is introducedphenomenologically20. Assuming all the spins sharingthe same (x, y)-coordinate behave identically, we arriveat a two-dimensional discretized version of the LLG equa-tion

3

ni + ni ×∑

j∈i

(

−ni+aeji + κni+aeji × eji − κ2b)

+ αni × ni

+1

v0

(

vxi (ni+ax − ni) + vyi (ni+ay − ni))

= 0. (11)

The drift velocity vi = (vxi , vyi ) is related to the current

density through a3j = pxv, where x is the number of con-duction electrons enclosed in a unit cell of volume a3 andp is the spin polarization fraction. All physical quantitiesin the equation are made dimensionless by choosing theunit of time t0 = h/J , and κ = D/J , b = B/(D2/J).The quantity v0 = aS/t0px with the dimension of veloc-ity is introduced as well. The wavelength of the spiralis given by λ ∼ 2π

√2a/κ in two dimensions. Square

lattice of size L × L is adopted throughout the simula-tion and the κ value equal to 0.5, which yields the spiralwavelength λ ∼ 4π

√2a ∼ 17.8a. The diameter of the

Skyrmion is roughly λ/2, which makes the Skyrmion ra-dius Rs ∼ λ/4. The sum

∑

j∈i spans the four nearestneighbors of the site i, connected by the unit vectors eji.Time-integration of the discrete LLG equation (11) is

done using the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method. Eachunit of time t0 is sliced into over 1000 steps for theintegration procedure, with no difference in the result

found for finer step sizes. Typical integration ran up tot/t0 ∼ 103 without a noticeable error accumulation. Thespin current density j = v/v0 is given the circulatingprofile with the Lorentzian shape

j(r) = φj0R2

c

R2c + r2

(12)

at the center of the simulation lattice, characterized byits magnitude j0 and the extent Rc. Both positive andnegative j0 corresponding to the CCW (CW) circulationof the spin current were considered. In our convention,a uniform spin current j = j0 leads to the Skyrmion flowvelocity vs in the same direction, vs ‖ j0, opposite towhat was used in Ref. 19. Previous study7,12,13 foundthe magnetic phase with helical spin configuration at zeromagnetic field and Skyrmion crystal phase over the inter-mediate field values bc1 <∼ b <∼ bc2. Two magnetic fieldsare considered in our simulation here, one for b slightlyless than the upper critical field strength bc2 where a typ-ical ground state consists of ferromagnetic spins dottedwith a few isolated anti-Skyrmions (Fig. 1b)7,8,13, andthe other at b = 0 and having the helical spins as theground state (Fig. 2b). We refer to these two groundstates as FM′ (FM+anti-Skyrmions) and H, respectively.

III. PROCESSES OF CURRENT-INDUCED

SKYRMION FORMATION

A. Skyrmion production

Due to the simpleness of the ferromagnetic spin back-ground, it is easier to understand the formation processof Skyrmions for the FM′ case, b <∼ bc2. For optimalSkyrmion generation condition we choose Rc comparableto the typical radius of a Skyrmion, Rc ≈ Rs. As thesystem evolves over time, the time-dependent Skyrmionnumber Q(t) = (1/4π)

∫

d2r n(t) · (∂xn(t) × ∂yn(t)) isevaluated to keep track of the Skyrmion creation process.

As shown in Fig. 1, CW spin current produces, for abrief moment, a spin texture that corresponds roughly toa Skyrmion-anti-Skyrmion pair within the radius r <∼ Rs

(red core region in Fig. 1c-d). Out of the pair, theSkyrmion part soon vanishes, leaving behind an anti-Skyrmion (Fig. 1e-g). The anti-Skyrmion then gradually

drifts out, due to the finite Gilbert damping which givesrise to a velocity orthogonal to the local current flow.The Gilbert damping-induced Skyrmion Hall motion wasextensively discussed in Ref. 19 to which we refer the in-terested readers. The Skyrmion meanwhile experiencesan inward flow and vanishes. Once the anti-Skyrmionhas drifted a sufficient distance out, another burst ofSkyrmion-anti-Skyrmion pair takes place (Fig. 1h), withthe Skyrmion portion vanishing through the core againdecreasing the total Skyrmion number by an integeramount (Fig. 1i-l). Each burst of the Skyrmion-anti-Skyrmion pair and the subsequent decay of the Skyrmionis responsible for the total Skyrmion number Q(t) jump-ing by an integer amount as shown in Fig. 1a.

Evidently creation of Skyrmion-anti-Skyrmion pair(Skyrmion dipole) is energetically cheaper than creat-ing an isolated Skyrmion (Skyrmion monopole). Oncea pair is created, the Gilbert damping-induced Hall mo-tion naturally moves the two objects in the opposite di-

4

FIG. 1: (color online) Skyrmion generation by circulating spin current source in the FM′ background. (a) Time dependenceof the total Skyrmion number Q(t). Q(0) ≈ −2 is nonzero from the residual anti-Skyrmions in the ferromagnetic background.Blue (red)-colored curves correspond to CW (CCW) circulating current with the j0 value indicated for each curve. (b)-(l)Time-dependent snapshots of the spin configuration over the green-circled time interval in (a). Adjacent spins are separated bythe distance a. The circle at the center of (b) indicates Rc, the extent of the current source. Residual anti-Skyrmions lie outsidethe field of view. Red and blue refer to positive and negative Skyrmion densities, respectively. Time at which the snapshot istaken and the change in the Skyrmion number are given as (t/t0, Q(t)−Q(0)) above each figure. Skyrmion number is seen todecrease by one, and later by three. Threshold value j0c lies between 2.35 and 2.4 for CW spin current.

rections, so that only one species of Skyrmions can leavethe current core. When CCW current (j0 > 0) is ap-plied, the same Gilbert drifting mechanism that pushedthe anti-Skyrmions out now tends to absorb the nearbyanti-Skyrmions toward the core region because the di-rection of the Hall motion is also reversed. When ananti-Skyrmion is pulled sufficiently close to the center,a brief burst of Skyrmion appears at the core and “eatsup” the attracted anti-Skyrmion. A good mental pictureof the process is to take Fig. 1b-1g and reverse themin time. When all the existing anti-Skyrmions are eatenup in this way, the total Skyrmion number Q(t) remainsclose to zero (Fig. 1a) and does not rise above it as aconsequence of the fact that positive charge Skyrmionsare energetically forbidden for the magnetic field b > 0.

There is a critical value of the spin current densityj0c required to produce anti-Skyrmions out of the ferro-magnetic spin background. Obviously the rate of energyinput from the circulating current needs to outpace thatof the energy drain due to the Gilbert damping in orderto supply sufficient energy to create an anti-Skyrmion.Above the threshold, |j0| > j0c, the total Skyrmion num-ber begins to jump in integer steps with time intervalsthat decrease as |j0| − j0c increases (Fig. 1a).

Figure 2 depicts the Skyrmion creation process for Hbackground (b = 0). As with the FM′ background, Q(t)can be seen to increase in integer quantized steps. Incontrast to b > 0 case which prefers an anti-Skyrmioncharge, opposite signs of the circular current result inmore or less symmetrical profiles of Q(t) as shown in Fig.2a. Snapshots of spin configurations for Q = 0 → Q = 1are in Fig. 2b-g, and those of Q = 1 → Q = 2 in Fig. 2h-2l. At first a small patch of helical spin is torn into twodisjoint segments as in Fig. 2c-d near the current core,giving way to the nucleation of some defects in the in-tervening region. The defect profile is best described asthe meron-anti-Skyrmion-meron composite (merons arein blue, ant-Skyrmion in red in Fig. 2c), out of whichthe central anti-Skyrmion shrinks in size while the twomerons drift out, again due to the Gilbert damping-induced Hall motion. The two merons are responsiblefor the total charge Q(t) ≈ 1. Each time the processrepeats itself, the Skyrmion number increases by one.

In both H and FM′ spin backgrounds, the resultingcharge of the Skyrmions produced by the current is cor-related with the helicity of the circulation as predictedin an earlier argument; see paragraph following Eq. (6).In detail, however, the production process proves to be

5

FIG. 2: (color online) Skyrmion generation by circulating spin current source in the H background. (a) Time dependence of thetotal Skyrmion number Q(t) for various j0 values. Initial Skyrmion number is zero for the helical spin. Same color conventionas in Fig. 1 applies throughout this figure. (b)-(l) Two sets of snapshots corresponding to Q = 0 → 1 and Q = 1 → 2corresponding to two green circles in Fig. 2a.

far more intricate involving an Skyrmion-anti-Skyrmionpair at the initial stage of metamorphosis rather thanthe simple creation of an isolated Skyrmion out of thevacuum. A different mechanism then intervenes, namelyGilbert damping-assisted Hall motion, which separatesthe pair according to their respective charges, leavingonly one species of Skyrmions to survive at the end.

B. Influence of Gilbert damping

Gilbert damping plays a major role in the generationof Skyrmions and anti-Skyrmions by facilitating their ra-dially outward motion from the circulating spin currentregion. All results shown in Figures 1 and 2 are obtainedfor α = 1, which is a fairly large value for Gilbert damp-ing parameter. As the damping is reduced, the sharp,integer quantization of Skyrmion number Q(t) gets lessconspicuous as shown in Fig. 3. According to our numeri-cal observation, clear integer quantization of Q(t) is moreor less synonymous with the production of well-isolatedSkyrmions in real space, which only becomes possible forα in excess of certain minimum value as shown in Fig.3b and 3d. This is related to the quite complex mannerin which the Skyrmion creation process takes place. Theinitial creation process, as shown in Figs. 1 and 2, always

involves a pair of Skyrmions of opposite charges, out ofwhich only one is pushed outwards by virtue of Gilbertdamping-assisted Hall motion. A large Hall motion re-quires a correspondingly large Gilbert damping constant.Otherwise, when α is small, those Skyrmions after gener-ation continue to move in circular path (because currentis circular) rather than drifting out, and collide/mergewith other Skyrmions. This leads to a large overlap be-tween spatially adjacent Skyrmions, as well as a non-integral value of Q(t)22. Only with sufficiently large αdo we find that the Skyrmions are being pushed out fastenough after their generation to minimize the overlapand give rise to integer Q(t). Mochizuki’s recent LLGsimulation16 uses the Gilbert constant α ≤ 0.04, whileextra damping effects due to spin-motive force are ex-pected to increase this value to around 0.119. Furtherenhancing the Gilbert damping might require intentionaldisordering of the film by irradiation.

C. Skyrmion lifetime

Once the Skyrmions have been generated by means ofcurrent, it is important that they remain there after thecurrent is turned off if they are to serve as memory bits.After the current was applied long enough to nucleate aSkyrmion, we turned it off in the simulation to see if it

6

FIG. 3: (color online) Influence of Gilbert damping onSkyrmion generation. (a)-(b) Plot of Skyrmion number Q(t)with b = 0 (H background) for different Gilbert dampingconstants α. |Q(t)| increases monotonically with α withoutshowing signs of quantization when α is small. At a largerdamping, 0.3 < α < 0.5, quantization of Skyrmion numberbegins to occur. The time span of each integer plateau be-comes longer, and the production rate of Skyrmions becomesless, with increasing α. (c)-(d) Plot of the Skyrmion num-ber Q(t) with FM′ background. Numbers in the inset are theGilbert damping constants. (j0, Rc) = (−1.5, 3.0) was usedfor (a)-(b) and (j0, Rc) = (−2.5, 3.0) for (c)-(d).

would decay. In fact, the decay of Skyrmion is expectedbecause without the current, the Skyrmion would be ina metastable state. As the Q(t) plots in Fig. 4b and 4dshow, however, the anti-Skyrmions once created remainextremely stable although energetically it cannot existin the ground state for b = 0. As far as our numericalsimulation lasts, the spin patterns shown in Fig. 4a and4c remained persistently the same. Such a long lifetime ofan isolated Skyrmion is a positive feature in utilizing thechiral ferromagnet as a platform for encoding Skyrmion-based information.

D. Effects of radial current pulse

Earlier we used the circulating current as a platformto generate Skyrmions electrically. Clear, integer quan-tization of Skyrmion charge was possible only for verylarge Gilbert damping parameters. Here we show thatSkyrmions can also be created by radial current pulsesas given by

FIG. 4: (color online) Skyrmion generation by pulse cur-rent. (a)-(b) Pulse current of size j0 = 5 is applied for0 < t1/t0 < 50 over the helical spin state and then turnedoff. (c)-(d) j0 = 15 for 0 < t1/t0 < 15 over the FM′ state.Dotted vertical line in (b) and (d) indicates the terminationof the applied current. Top row: the spin configuration andSkyrmion number Q(t) − Q(0) when a sufficiently long timehas elapsed after the current is turned off. Bottom row: timedependence of the Skyrmion number Q(t)−Q(0). All currentdirections are CCW with Rc = 3 and α = 0.1.

j(r) = rj0√2r. (13)

While the radial current source remains on, a bunch ofplus and minus Skyrmion fragments appear from the cen-ter and drift out as they collide and annihilate with oppo-sitely charged fragments as shown in Fig. 5a. When theradial current is turned off, most of the plus and minusSkyrmion fragments annihilate, leaving behind a portionthat evolves into an integer-valued Skyrmion, with thesign as favored by the direction of the applied magneticfield, as shown in Fig. 5b and 5c. This way of creatingSkyrmion is only possible when external magnetic field isacting on the helical magnet. For helical spin configura-tion, the plus and minus Skyrmion densities created bythe radial current annihilate and disappear completely,returning back to the initial helical spin configurationover time.We emphasize that this method of generating

Skyrmions in the FM′ background works very well evenfor small values of the Gilbert damping constant α. Thisis because the selection process to isolate one particular

7

FIG. 5: (color online) Skyrmion creation by radial currentsource. Current pulse with j0 = 10 lasting for t/t0 = 10 wasgiven. The numbers above each figure indicate (t/t0, Q(t) −Q(0)). (a) Right at the turn-off, one finds a swarm of posi-tive and negative Skyrmion fragments. (b) After some timehas passed, most of the Skyrmions and anti-Skyrmions haveannihilated each other, leaving behind a predominant anti-Skyrmion density due to the external magnetic field. (c) Finalstate shows one anti-Skyrmion.

sign of Skyrmion is done by external magnetic field, notby Gilbert damping as in the case of circulating current.

IV. EXPERIMENTAL REALIZATION AND

DISCUSSION

The typical exchange energy scale of a chiral ferromag-net is J0 ∼ 3 meV23, with the dispersion hωk ∼ J0(ka0)

2

involving a0, the linear dimension of the physical unitcell. On the other hand, from our continuum LLG equa-tion in (10) follows the dispersion relation hωk ∼ J(ka)2.Hence, J used in our model is related to the microscopicparameter J0 by J ∼ J0(a0/a)

2, which also sets thetime and the velocity scales as t0 = h/J ≈ 220(a/a0)

2

fs and v0 = aS/t0px ∼ (a0J0/h)(S/p)(a0/a)4 ∼ 1.8 ×

103(S/p)(a0/a)4 m/s.

In order to fix the ratio a/a0, we note that with ourchoice κ = 0.5 the typical wavelength of the spiral isλ = 4π

√2a ≈ 17.8a. Values of λ vary quite markedly

among the chiral ferromagnets, ranging from ∼3 nm forFeGe21, ∼20 nm for MnSi5, ∼70 nm for FeGe8, and ∼90nm for Fe1−xCoxSi

6,7. Taking the characteristic spi-ral wavelength λ ∼ 60 nm yields 17.8a ∼ 60 nm, ora ∼ 4 nm. Choosing the microscopic lattice constanta0 = 4A then gives the ratio a/a0 ∼ 10. Finally, with

the spin polarization fraction p ∼ 0.1 and S = 1 we ob-tain v0 ∼ 1 m/s. The critical current density j0c of orderunity we saw in the simulation thus corresponds to thedrift velocity of a few m/s to be imparted to the con-duction electrons. Estimate of the carrier concentrationin MnSi24 ρe ∼ 1028 − 1029/m3 yields the critical cur-rent density jc ∼ 1010 − 1011A/m2, which is close to,or below the critical current required for domain wallswitching in typical magnetic devices20. The time inter-val between successive Skyrmion creation events as shownin Figs. 1 and 2 is ∼ 100t0. With the estimate t0 ∼ 20ps, the time interval is ∼ 2 ns. The requirement forSkyrmion nucleation is reduced to having a strong cur-rent pulse of a few nanosecond duration with the densityjc ∼ 1010 − 1011A/m2 - a practice readily available inmodern-day spintronics laboratories.Although a detailed practical scheme to implement the

circuitry needed for the Skyrmion generation is yet to beworked out, our simulation provides a proof-of-conceptdemonstration for Skyrmion creation by electrical cur-rent. It is conceivable, in principle, that an artificialbend in the current pathway (like a curved freeway) isfabricated to mimic the circular pattern we assumed inthe simulation. As the current of enough intensity passesthrough such a bend, Skyrmions will “pop out” from thepoint of greatest curvature. The Skyrmion productionby means of radial current discussed in Sec. III D canbe mimicked by designing a narrow channel of metallicmagnet that opens up into a much wider region. A cur-rent coming through such constriction will be a source ofradial motion, thus of Skyrmions. Although much engi-neering ideas need to be carved out yet, the fundamentalprocesses revealed by the present numerical simulationwill be exciting to realize in laboratories in the near fu-ture.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Mid-career Researcher Pro-gram (No. 2010-0008529). Valuable comments on themanuscript from Suk-Bong Choe and discussions withHyun-Woo Lee are acknowledged. We also thank pro-fessor Naoto Nagaosa for careful reading of the initialmanuscript and suggestions.

∗ Electronic address: hanjh@skku.edu1 T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. of London, Ser. A 260,127 (1961); Nucl. Phys. 31, 556 (1961).

2 R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons (North-Holland,1989).

3 S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. A. Kivelson, and E. H.Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16419 (1993).

4 S. E. Barrett, G. Dabbagh, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, andR. Tycko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5112 (1995).

5 S. Muhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch,

A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. Boni, Science 323, 915(2009).

6 W. Munzer, A. Neubauer, T. Adams, S. Muhlbauer, C.Franz, F. Jonietz, R. Georgii, P. Boni, B. Pedersen, M.Schmidt, A. Rosch, and C. Pfleiderer, Phys. Rev. B 81,041203(R) (2010).

7 X. Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han,Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature 465, 901(2010).

8 X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z.

8

Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, NatureMat. 10, 106 (2011).

9 S. Heinze, K. von Bergmann, M. Menzel, J. Brede, A. Ku-betzka, R. Wiesendanger, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blugel,Nature Phys. 7, 713 (2011).

10 I. Raicevic, Dragana Popovic, C. Panagopoulos, L. Ben-fatto, M. B. Silva Neto, E. S. Choi, and T. Sasagawa, Phys.Rev. Lett. 106, 227206 (2011).

11 J-i. Fukuda and S. Zumer, Nature Commun.doi:10.1038/ncomms1250 (2011).

12 A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii, Sov. Phys. JETP68, 101 (1989); A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, J. Magn.Magn. Mater. 138, 255 (1994).

13 Jung Hoon Han, Jiadong Zang, Zhihua Yang, Jin-HongPark, and Naoto Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094429 (2010).

14 Su Do Yi, Shigeki Onoda, Naoto Nagaosa, and Jung HoonHan, Phys. Rev. B 80, 054416 (2009).

15 Olga Petrova and Oleg Tchernyshyov, Phys. Rev. B 84,214433 (2011).

16 Masahito Mochizuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017601 (2012).17 F. Jonietz, S. Muhlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, A. Neubauer, W.

Munzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. Boni, R. A.

Duine, K. Everschor, M. Garst, and A. Rosch, Science 330,1648 (2010).

18 K. Everschor, M. Garst, R. A. Duine, and A. Rosch, Phys.Rev. B 84, 064401 (2011).

19 J. Zang, M. Mostovoy, J. H. Han, and N. Nagaosa, Phys.Rev. Lett. 107, 136804 (2011).

20 G. Tatara, H. Kohno, and J. Shibata, Phys. Rep. 468, 213(2008).

21 N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K.Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, and Y.Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156603 (2011).

22 In a continuum theory one should obtain integer Q(t) evenfor overlapping Skyrmions. The non-integral values are aresult of the calculation being carried out on a discretelattice.

23 S. V. Grigoriev, S. V. Maleyev, A. I. Okorokov, Yu. O.Chetverikov, P. Boni, R. Georgii, D. Lamago, H. Eckerlebe,and K. Pranzas, Phys. Rev B 74, 214414 (2006).

24 M. Lee, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, and N. P. Ong, Phys. Rev.B 75, 172403 (2007).