11
Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting [email protected] MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting [email protected] MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Signe Zoller

Zoller Wine Consulting

[email protected]

MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Page 2: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Avoiding the need to fine white wines

-Tailor skin contact time and temperature to grape-In high terpene varietals glycosidic enzymes can contribute to course texture-High alcohols exacerbate harsh phenolics-Use a high polysaccharide-producing yeast-Judicious use of barrels and enological tannins -Lees management – Lees fine, use of glucanase, delay racking to maximize mannoproteins, polysaccharides-Too much acid can negatively affect texture-Oxidation management-Delay heat and cold stability for max lees benefit

Page 3: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Red Wine Management

-Pick at low catechin levels-0 to 100% berry crush – usually at least 50% for most Paso Robles fruit-Press early for tannic varietals-Seed removal during pumpover-Judicious use of oak alternatives and enological tannins-Aerative rack to barrels-Splash into receiving tank from the press-Periodic racking to soften tannins-Treat sulfides during or immediately after fermentation

Page 4: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

White Skin

Influence

FINING FOR BALANCE

Maximum fruit expression

Well-textured but not coarse

Page 5: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Compounds T – 0 hours (17oC)

T- 5 hours (17oC)

T- 22 hrs (17oC)

Sig LSDs

Methanol 34a 42a 58b *** 9.67

1-Hexanol (herbaceious/woody) 1.49a 1.64b 1.65b ** 0.092

2-phenyl-ethanol 16.77a 20.64b 19.75b *** 1.23

Ethyl acetate (sweet, solvent) 31a 40b 48c *** 7.90

Isoamyl acetate (banana, pear) 0.772a 0.543b 19.75b *** 1.23

2-phenyl ethyl acetate 0.083a 0.116a 0.026b ** 0.048

Ethyl butyrate (fruity, orange) 0.335a 0.765b 0.491c *** 0.148

Ethyl octanoate 1.08a 1.24ab 1.37b * 0.223

Ethyl decanoate 0.124a 0.030b 0.137a ** 0.071

Ethyl lactate (creamy) 33.57a 21.27b 24.25c *** 1.10

Isobutyric acid 0.550a 1.25b 1.08b *** 0.205

Butyric acid (goat, sheep, bison milk)

2.04a 2.78ab 3.64b ** 0.908

Hexanoic acid 6.25a 7.02b 8.34c *** 0.300

Octanoic acid 7.05a 7.45a 8.75b *** 0.446

Skin Contact - Treixadura – Portugal - Falque and Fernandez, 1996

Page 6: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Fruity flavor increase of Spanish Airén white wines made by brief fermentation skin contact.

The wines fermented with skins contained higher concentrations of methanol, proline, ethyl acetate, glycerol and ashes than did those fermented without skins.

The sensory profile method showed a considerable improvement in the fruity flavor as a result of mild maceration with the skins during the first 48 hours of fermentation of Airén wines.

Garcia-Romero et al, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 1999

Page 7: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Chardonnay wines with 0, 5.3, 10.7 & 16 hours pomace contact at 55oF. Phenolics, expressed as total, flavonoid or nonflavonoid, increased linearly (p < 0.001).The "total" aroma increased significantly (p < 0.001) with skin contact time, the 16-hour sample being rated the highest. The "fruity" aroma increased as well, but was lowest in the 5.3-hour treatment. No significant differences in bitterness or astringency were found among the four contact times.Arnold & Noble 1979

Chardonnay pomace contact (0, 6, 12 & 24 hrs at 59oF) showed no significant differences for fruit intensity, bitterness or acidity (N blanket during SC)Test, Noble et al 1986

Pomace contact (4 hrs at 59oF) showed increased aroma intensity for Chardonnay but not Grenache blancCheynier et al 1989

Page 8: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Whole Cluster or Crush?

Chardonnay – Whole Cluster or de-stem/crush/cold depending on stylePinot Gris – probably de-stem/crush/cold – Fining TrialsSauvignon Blanc – De-stem/crush/cold - Fining TrialsGewurztraminer – De-stem/crush/cold - Fining Trials (try gelatin)Viognier – Whole ClusterAlbarino – probably de-stem/crush/cold – Fining TrialsVermentino - probably de-stem/crush/cold – Fining TrialsGrenache Blanc - Whole cluster

Page 9: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Research needed

Optimal skin contact time by varietal for whites – focusing also on the question of crush or whole cluster

Then develop: Predictive modeling based on things we can measure like Brix at flavor peak, terpenes, flavor precursors, catechins/tannin assay

Page 10: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Frequently Used Fining Agents:

Isinglass/Silica GelBentonite – sine qua non for the presentCopper sulfateCaseinGelatinLees/Yeast PVPP Albumin

Frequently Used Fining Agents:

Isinglass/Silica GelBentonite – sine qua non for the presentCopper sulfateCaseinGelatinLees/Yeast PVPP Albumin

Page 11: Signe Zoller Zoller Wine Consulting signe@zollerwinestyling.com MAXIMIZING AROMAS/ BALANCING FINISH

Useful Publication from Jim Harbertson at WSU:

‘A Guide to the Fining of Wine’

Thank youSigne Zoller

Zoller Wine [email protected]

m