Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

  • Upload
    cakalil

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    1/16

    1

    Exploring the Links Between

    International Business andPoverty Reduction:

    a case study of

    Unilever in Indonesia

    An Oxfam GB, Novib, Unilever and Unilever

    Indonesia joint research project

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    2/16

    2

    Background

    Why this research project?

    Shared interest in increasingcontribution of international businessto poverty reduction

    UN Global Compact/MDGs

    What is this report about? a learning project; not an audit of

    Unilever or UI. The goal: to understand how wealth

    generated by a multinationalcompanys local operating company

    can have positive or negative impactson people living in poverty To do this, we looked at UIs entire

    value chain from small-scale producerto low-income consumer to understandthe points of entry and leverage toreduce poverty.

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    3/16

    3

    Four areas of research

    UIs macro-economic level impacts

    UIs employment impacts

    The value chain from supply to distribution

    Low-income consumers in the marketplace

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    4/16

    4

    The UI business

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    5/16

    5

    Foreign exchange, trade & human resource flows

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    6/16

    6

    UIs distribution of profits

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    7/16

    7

    Value Chain

    Estimated

    employment linked

    to UI value chain

    (2003)

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    8/16

    8

    Value Chain

    Estimated

    distribution of value

    generated along UIs

    value chain (2003)

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    9/16

    9

    The supply chain

    Direct suppliers

    UI had 334 suppliers, spending approx Rp 3,591 billion (US$ 419m) 80% of suppliers are domestic, 20% are international Top 10 suppliers by value are all Indonesian and account for 34% of

    purchases Domestic suppliers provided 84% of goods and services All UI suppliers required to observe Unilevers Code of Business

    Principles UI maintains basic standards through negotiations, on-going dialogue, and

    a rolling three-year audit programme

    UI supplier companies exceed legal regulations governing wages andbenefits in Indonesia but pay and employment conditions for suppliersemployees and contract workers were lower than those for UIs directworkforce

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    10/16

    10

    The supply chain (cont.)

    Producers of raw materials

    UI products are made from raw materials sourcedmainly from Indonesian producers, traders andprocessors

    Producers growing agricultural products are among

    the poorest people in UIs value chain Five agricultural raw materials entering UIs localsupply chain stand out in this regardtea, palmoil, cassava, coconut sugar, and black soybean

    The market for coconut sugar a key ingredientfor Kecap Bangois characterised by oversupply,with farmers selling through middlemen andexperiencing high levels of debt which keep themin debt peonage

    Where there is a business case for alternativesupply chains, these can have positive impacts forpoor producers

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    11/16

    11

    The distribution chain

    UIs distribution side of the value chain createsmore employment and value than the supplyside

    The distribution chain creates twice as many

    jobs (62.5%) as the supply chain side (27.1%) This includes thousands of jobs among an

    estimated 1.8 million small stores and vendors This employment is often overlooked as a

    contributor to economic development andpoverty reduction

    The closer to UI that distributors and retailersare in the chain, the more likely they are to gainskills and knowledge, negotiate better pricesand conditions, experience higher employmentstandards and incomes, and be able to build upbusiness capital

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    12/16

    12

    Value chain insights

    Employment

    More than 300,000 people (FTEs) make their livelihoods in UIsvalue chain

    More than half this employment is found in the distributionand retail chain

    Value

    Total value generated along the chain was estimated atUS$633m: 1/3 UI 2/3 in the chain; the government receives(from UI alone) 26% of the total value generated

    The value captured by poorer people working at either end ofthe value chain is much lower than the value captured by thosewho are in direct interaction with UI

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    13/16

    13

    Lessons learned from project

    Understand the job multiplier in UIs total value chain, and potentialuse of value chain policies as tool in sustainable poverty reduction

    Value-adding activity creates a broad tax base - essential fordevelopment of formal economy and funding of governmentprogrammes

    FMCG value chains can offer poor people an opportunity to gain basicskills and earn incremental, regular income

    Although imperfect, may be useful first steps towards increasing skills,

    accumulating assets, and improving quality of life The scrutiny of UIs relationship with low-income consumers and its

    contractor review processes suggested ways in which the companycould improve its interactions with people living in poverty

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    14/16

    14

    Lessons learned from

    project

    Highly embedded MNCs and large domestic companies might in

    future provide a focus for useful work on private sector poverty

    impacts and poverty reduction strategies. This project has increased our understanding of UIs impacts and

    interactions with people living in poverty in Indonesia.

    Gained a better understanding of the potential of distribution chains to

    generate employment and income

    But participation in value chains does not guarantee improvements forpoor people

    Often difficult to define what constitutes fair practice by companies.

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    15/16

    15

    Follow up actions

    Unilever

    Oxfam GB / Novib

  • 8/14/2019 Session 3.3 Understanding Corporate Impacts - Mandy Cormack

    16/16

    16

    Exploring the Links Between

    International Business andPoverty Reduction:

    a case study of

    Unilever in Indonesia

    Questions & Discussion