16
SEISMIC REFLECTIONS OF SEISMIC REFLECTIONS OF ROCK PROPERTIES ROCK PROPERTIES Jack P. Dvorkin Jack P. Dvorkin Stanford University Stanford University 2008 2008

SEISMIC REFLECTIONS OF ROCK PROPERTIES - Earthjack/JD_Course_2008a.pdf · 1.5 METHODS OF PREDICTION Forward Modeling of Seismic Response from Rock Properties The AVO response changes

  • Upload
    lythien

  • View
    220

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

SEISMIC REFLECTIONS OFSEISMIC REFLECTIONS OFROCK PROPERTIESROCK PROPERTIES

Jack P. DvorkinJack P. Dvorkin

Stanford UniversityStanford University20082008

1. Problem Formulation

1.2

JD 2008

1.3

MAIN QUESTION OF ROCK PHYSICS

How to Remotely Map Rock Properties and Conditions:Lithology, Porosity, Pressure, Saturation

Rock and fluid prediction away from well control requires understanding of howrock's bulk and seismic properties are linked to each other and how they vary withgeologic age, depth, and location.

PROSPECTPROSPECTExistingExisting

WellWell

The main question of remote sensing is:What reservoir properties may stand behind the seismic amplitude?

1.4

METHODS OF PREDICTION

Forward Modeling of Seismic Response

Depending on the selectedelastic properties of theoverburden and reservoir,we model various classesof AVO response.

AVO Class I

AVO Class II

AVO Class III

Ip = ρbVp

PR ≡ν =12(Vp /Vs)

2 − 2(Vp /Vs)

2 −1

Impedance and Poisson's Ratio

1.5

METHODS OF PREDICTION

Forward Modeling of Seismic Response from RockProperties

The AVO response changes withthe compaction of shale whichmay be depth-driven.

AVO Class I

AVO Class II

AVO Class III

Shal

e co

mpa

ctio

n w

ith in

crea

sing

dep

th

1.6

METHODS OF PREDICTION

Forward Modeling of Seismic Response versus Fluid

The AVO response changes withthe pore fluid -- from gas to oilto water.

AVO Class II

GAS

AVO Class I - II

OIL

AVO Class I

WET

1.7

METHODS OF PREDICTION -- LAB

Relations between Lithology, Porosity, and ElasticProperties

Location of rock in theelastic-property plane.

Laboratory Measurements. Han’s (1986) laboratory data set includes over 60sandstone samples of medium to low porosity and zero to 50% clay content.Shown below is a P-wave velocity versus porosity cross-plot for a subset ofthese data. The measurements shown below are for room-dry samples at 40MPa confining pressure and atmospheric pore pressure (air).

All data. Data color-coded by clay content.

CLAY < 0.2

CLAY > 0.2

0.0 < CLAY < 0.5

1.8

METHODS OF PREDICTION -- LAB

Relations between Fluid and Elastic Properties

Location of rock in theelastic-property plane.

WET

DRY

Han's (1986) Data

1.9

EFFECTS OF OIL PROPERTIES

Oil Reservoir Response Depends on Oil API and GOR

Dec

reas

ing

GO

R

1.10

METHODS OF PREDICTION -- WELL

Relations between Lithology, Fluid, and ElasticProperties in Log Data

Sand/shale well in Alaska. Impedance and Poisson's ratio versus porosity.Top: at in-situ conditions, bottom: wet.

Impedance versus Poisson's ratio. Left: at in-situ conditions, right: wet.

1.11

METHODS OF PREDICTION -- WELL

Relations between Lithology, Fluid, Depth, and ElasticProperties in Log Data

Impedance versus Poisson's ratio. Left: at in-situ conditions, right: wet.

Sand/shale gas well offshore South Africa.

Impedance-porosity cross-plots show effects of clay (left) and compaction (right).

1.12

PRIMER ON ROCK PHYSICS

Finding Transforms and Applying them to Impedance Inversion

Reflection amplitude carries information about elastic contrast in the subsurface.Inversion attempts to translate this information into elastic properties within an interval.

These properties are important because we are interested in absolute values oflithology, fluid, and porosity within intervals.

La Cira Norte -- Courtesy Ecopetrol and Mario Gutierrez

1.13

PRIMER ON ROCK PHYSICS

Finding Transforms and Applying them to Impedance Inversion

La Cira Norte -- CourtesyEcopetrol and Mario

Gutierrez6

8

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Ip (

km/s

g/c

c)

POROSITY

SANDSHALE

4 6 8 10Ip (km/s g/cc)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3POROSITY

Log data can be treated as a result of a controlled experiment where various rockproperties are measured in the subsurface. Shown below are VSHALE, total porosity,and Ip curves for a Colombian well drilled through Tertiary sand/shale sequence.

The Ip curve mirrors the porosity curve. This means that there is a relation betweenimpedance and porosity.

0 0.5 1VSHALE AND Sw

15 m

1.14

PRIMER ON ROCK PHYSICS

Finding Transforms and Applying them to Impedance Inversion

La Cira Norte -- Courtesy Ecopetrol and Mario Gutierrez

Impedance-porosity transform can be applied to impedance inversion volume toproduce a porosity/lithology volume. Shown below is a La Cira field (Colombia)example.

Porosity Strata Slice from 3D Seismic Data and Rock Physics Trend

6

8

10

0 0.1 0.2 0.3

Ip (

km/s

g/c

c)

POROSITY

SANDSHALE

1.15

PRIMER ON ROCK PHYSICS

Finding Transforms and Applying them to Impedance Inversion

La Cira Norte -- Courtesy Ecopetrol and Mario Gutierrez

Stratigraphy and geology, in general, are important factors to be used to confirmmathematically derived reservoir descriptions.

1.16

PRIMER ON ROCK PHYSICS

Caveat of Scale

Thin sub-resolution layers produce smaller amplitude than thick layers. As a result,they produce smaller seismic impedance.

Applying an impedance-porosity transform to seismic impedance will produce awrong porosity estimate.

Wet Sediment: Blue isSand and Red is Clay

WrongPorosity

Gas Sand