22
PAT BURNS VICE PRESIDENT FOR IT COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY HAEHN COMMUNITY ROOM, DWIRE HALL 204 UNIV. OF COLORADO AT COLORADO SPRINGS 11:00 AM TO 2:00 PM PLEASE BRING A BROWN BAG LUNCH SCONE Networking Meeting

SCONE Networking Meeting

  • Upload
    hiroko

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SCONE Networking Meeting. Pat Burns Vice President for IT Colorado State University Haehn CommunitY Room, Dwire Hall 204 Univ. of Colorado at Colorado Springs 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM Please bring a brown bag lunch. Attendees :. Alan Ashurst and Danny Parks, OIT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SCONE Networking Meeting

PAT BURNSVICE PRESIDENT FOR IT

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYHAEHN COMMUNITY ROOM, DWIRE HALL 204UNIV. OF COLORADO AT COLORADO SPRINGS

11:00 AM TO 2:00 PMPLEASE BRING A BROWN BAG LUNCH

SCONE Networking Meeting

Page 2: SCONE Networking Meeting

Attendees:Alan Ashurst and

Danny Parks, OITPat Burns and Scott

Baily, CSURay Caplinger and

Dennis Shultz, District 11

Jeff Custard & Marla Meehl, NCAR/UPOP

Dan Maas, CASEDan Morris, CDE

David Niccoli, CSU-Pueblo

Jeff Pearson, Mesa County Schools

Jon Saunders, SECOMDenise Shorey, EagleNetRandy Stiles, Colorado

CollegeKent Tamsen, CALETJerry Wilson, UCCS

9/9/2008

2

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 3: SCONE Networking Meeting

Agenda

1. Introductions2. Purpose of meeting – Burns3. Backbone network – Scott Baily,

David Niccoli4. Possible topology – Jeff Custard5. SECOM discussion – Jon Saunders6. Cost models – Jeff Custard7. Other8. Adjourn

9/9/2008

3

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 4: SCONE Networking Meeting

1. Introductions

9/9/2008

4

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 5: SCONE Networking Meeting

2. Purpose of Meeting – Burns

A. Alan Ashurst – MNT’s strategyB. Is there a fit for providing UPOP services

in the 791 LATA via SCONE or otherwise? - Burns

C. Jeff Custard – UPOP’s strategy, SEGPD. Kent Tamsen – interest from K-12E. CDE commentsF. Others’ comments

9/9/2008

5

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 6: SCONE Networking Meeting

2. Purpose of Meeting – Burns

A. Alan Ashurst – MNT’s strategyB. Is there a fit for providing UPOP

services in the 791 LATA via SCONE or otherwise? - Burns

C. Jeff Custard – UPOP’s strategy, SEGPD. Kent Tamsen – interest from K-12E. CDE commentsF. Others’ comments

9/9/2008

6

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 7: SCONE Networking Meeting

B. Is There a Fit? – Burns

1. Access to national R&E networks2. Multi-homed to Commodity, automatic fail over3. “Dialable” capacity in 1 Mbps increments

1. Takes ~1 hour to adjust capacity2. Summer savings

4. Intra-FRGP traffic1. “Free”2. Can burst to circuit capacity, e.g. 1 Gbps3. High quality (e.g. video conferencing, multimedia work)

5. Community membership and evolution toward Next Generation Optical Networking

1. Some circuits can be shared, lowering costs and increasing capacity

2. A way for us to make progress, on NGN as a state

9/9/2008

7

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 8: SCONE Networking Meeting

Single-circuit Connectivity & Pricing

Qwest pricing looks attractive, on the surface, but: Capacity is not shared A site must order sufficient capacity to burst to its

maximum rate, or limit functionalityConsider pricing for shared circuits/services

EC BOCES at 1 Gbps through SCONE, Commodity only EC BOCES includes 17 rural school districts SCONE total aggregate connectivity at 30 Mbps We advertised $100-$150/Mbps-mo (FRGP ‘raw’ pricing) Instead, via aggregation, EC BOCES pricing averages closer to

$15/Mbps-mo – see slide on next pageUPOP pricing should be examined in this light

9/9/2008

8

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 9: SCONE Networking Meeting

9/9/20089SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 10: SCONE Networking Meeting

K-12 Video Classing Initiative 10

Disconnected Optical NetworksNeed an Inventory to Define Possibilities

EC BOCES

CSU

UW, Laramie

FRGP, Denve

r

BoulderLongmon

t

UW lease from National

FiberCo

Wyoming

Colorado

Limon

Kansas

Pueblo

Colorado Springs

Burlington

Monument Hill regen

Durango

Glenwood Springs

Bennett

“CCoD Fiber”

FMC

BiSON

CSM

PPIR

Grand Junction

Frisco33 Mbpswave

NC Telecom

Kit Carson

NE BOCES

Arkansas Valley

(SECOM)

DUSEL

(FastTrack)

PRPA(PC

Telecom)

SE BOCES

Page 11: SCONE Networking Meeting

2. Purpose of Meeting – Burns

A. Alan Ashurst – MNT’s strategyB. Is there a fit for providing UPOP services

in the 791 LATA via SCONE or otherwise? - Burns

C. Jeff Custard – UPOP’s strategy, SEGPD. Kent Tamsen – interest from K-12E. CDE commentsF. Others’ comments

9/9/2008

11

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 12: SCONE Networking Meeting

Agenda

1. Introductions2. Purpose of meeting – Burns3. Backbone network – Scott Baily,

David Niccoli4. Possible topology – Jeff Custard5. SECOM discussion – Jon Saunders6. Cost models – Jeff Custard7. Other8. Adjourn

9/9/2008

12

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 13: SCONE Networking Meeting

3. Backbone Network–Baily, Niccoli

A.SCONE overviewB.Level3 back-up circuitC.Separate VLANs for transportD.Secondary routing for redundancyE.Management and operations

9/9/2008

13

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 14: SCONE Networking Meeting

SCONE Overview

Southern Colorado Optical Network for Education

Partnership between CDOT and Higher EdCDOT provided right of way, infrastructure

including fiberHigher Ed provided design, labor (splicing),

and $50KApproximately $70K in equipment was

funded by the participants

Page 15: SCONE Networking Meeting

SCONE Participants

Colorado State University Ft. Collins, Pueblo, System Office

University of Colorado at Colorado SpringsEast Central BOCES

Page 16: SCONE Networking Meeting

CU HSC

Mon. Hill

Traffic Op. Ctr.

CSU-P

FRGP

SCONE Topology September, 2008 (approx.)

Level3 Backup Circuit

UCCS

Page 17: SCONE Networking Meeting

Basic Architecture

Gigabit Ethernet from Denver to PuebloMultiple VLANs, one for each site

Most efficient use of fiber Very cost effective

Pueblo-Denver Backup circuit via Level3 Metro Ethernet Service Currently capped at 100 Mbps Automatic Fail-over

Page 18: SCONE Networking Meeting

Management and Operations

Monitored and Managed by CSU NOC Most end sites do their own monitoring/alerting

“Best effort” supportRely upon “local” staff in some situations

Remote hands support, diagnostics, equipment swapsWeb page maintained at CSU

Contacts, Diagrams, Changes, Outages

Page 19: SCONE Networking Meeting

4. Possible Topology – Jeff Custard

A.Benefits of FRGP participation: aggregation, free peering, services, I2 access, ...

B.Use SCONE for transport across the LATA

C.Explore local connection optionsD.QMOE across the LATAE.UPOP place Ethernet switches for

aggregation at UCCS and CSU-P9/9/2008

19

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 20: SCONE Networking Meeting

5. SECOM – Jon Saunders

A.Use of SECOM fiber span to L3 service?B.Peering with the FRGPC.Possible interconnect with VNETS at Cheyenne Wells

D.Possible future collaboration for SCONE and SECOM for back-up services

9/9/2008

20

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 21: SCONE Networking Meeting

6. Cost Models

A. UPOP costs – Jeff CustardB. SCONE cost sharing discussion – all

9/9/2008

21

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204

Page 22: SCONE Networking Meeting

Q&A

Are most welcome.

9/9/2008

22

SCONE Meeting Dwire Hall 204