Upload
vina-nguyen
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
1/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
2/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
3/22
MAP 2-1
.
THE
ANCIENT NEAR EAST
The green areas represent
fertile
land
that could support
early
agriculture, notably the
area
between
the
Tigris
and
Euphrates
rivers and the strips of land on
either
side
of
the
Nile
in
Egypt.
2-2
.
RUINS
AND
PLAN OF THE ANU ZIGGURAT AND
WHITE TEMPLE
Uruk
(present-day
Warka,
lraq).
c. 3400-3200
ece.
Many
ancient Near
Eastern
cities
still
lie undiscovered.
ln most cases an
archaeological site in the region is signaled by
a large mound-known locally
as
atell, tepe,
or huyuk-Thal
represents
the
accumulated debris of
generations
of
human
habitation.
When
properly
excavated, such mounds
yield
evidence
about
the
people
who
inhabited
the
site.
ABT OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST
CHAPTER
2
Anu
District of
Uruk
1. White Temple
2. allar
3
processional
stairs
4. NW terrace
4
,)
/'--'
/
'"
2
,ll
,|,li
i
--ru
29
-
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
4/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
5/22
marriage
between the
goddess
and
Dumuzi, her
consort-a
role
taken
by
the
priest-king-tht
took
place
during the New Year's
festival
to ensure the
fertiliry
of clops, animals,
and
people,
and thus
lhe
continued
survival of Uruk.
VOTM FIGITRES Limestone statues clated
to about 2900-
2600
ncn
from
the
Square
Temple
in Eshnunna
(rrc.
2-s),
exca-
valed in 1,932-1933, reveal another
aspect of Sumerian
religious
art. These
votive figures
of
men
and women-images dedicated
lo the gods-are directly relatecl
to
an ancient Near Eastern
devo-
tional practice
in
which
individual
worshipers conld set up irnages
of
themselves in
a shrine before a larger,
more
elaborate image
of
a
god.
A
simple inscription might identify the fgure
as
"One
who
offers
prayersl"
Longer inscriptions
might
recount
in detail
all the things the donor had accomplished in
the
god's
honor.
Each
sculpture
served
as
a
stand-in
for
the donor, locked
in
eye-contact
with
the god, caught perpetually
in
the act of worship.
The
sculptors
of
these votive statues followed
conventions
(traditional ways
of
representing
forms) that were irnportant in
Sumerian rt. Figures have
srylized
faces
and bodies,
dressed
in
clothing
that
emphasizes
pure
cylindrical shapes. They
stand sol-
emnly,
hands
clasped in lespect, pelhaps
a
posture
expected in
devotional contexts. The
bold,
staring
eyes
lnay be related
to state;
ments in
contemporary Sumerian texts that
advise
worshipers
to
approach
their
gods
ich
an attentive
gaze.
As with
the
face
of
the woman from Uruk,
arched
brows were inlaid with
dark
shell,
stone, or bitumen lhat once emphsized the huge,
wide-open eyes.
2-4
.
CARVED VESSEL
From
Uruk
(present-day
Warka,
lraq).
c. 3300-3000 BcE.
Alabaster,
height
36"
(91
cm). lraq Museum, Baghdad.
2-5
.
TWELVE
VOTIVE
FIGURES
From
the
Square
Temple,
Eshnunna
(present-day
Tell
Asmar,
lraq). c.
2900-2600 ace.
Limestone,
alabaster, and
gypsum,
height
of
largest
figure
approx. 30"
(76.3
cm).
The Oriental
lnstitute
Museum,
University
of
Chicago.
ART OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST
CHAPTER
2
31 I
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
6/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
7/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
8/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
9/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
10/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
11/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
12/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
13/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
14/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
15/22
2-17
.
ASSURNASIRPAL
ll K|LLING
LTONS
From
the
palace
complex
of Assurnasirpal
ll,
Kalhu
(present-day
Nimrud,
lraq). c. 875-860 ece.
Alabaster,
height
approx.
39'(99.1
cm).
British Museum,
London.
DUR
SHARRUKIN
Sargon II
(mled
72I-706
ncn) buik
a
new Assyrian
capital
at
SharrLrkin
(present-clay
I{horsabad,
Iraq).
On rhe
norrhwesr
of
the capital,
a
walled
citadel,
or
fortress,
str.acldlecl
the city
citadel
gate
A
Nabu temple
D-rr
side
wall
(rrc.
z-re).
Within
the
citrclel,
Sargon's
palace
cornplex
(rhe
group
of buildings
where
the luler
govelned :urd
r.esicled)
stood
on
a raisecl, fortified platfdrrl
about
40 feet high-denlonsrrrirlg
rhe
use
of ar-t as
political
propagrncla.
throne room
t
'/.,
,,tn thc
tlbc
bchi:rd lrirn,
br-rt this
rpprr-cntly
tllnclrLil clonlcstic
sccnc is rcturlly
l vi('tor)/
cclcblltion.
,A
grisy
troplry, thc
scrrclcrl
hcrcl
of his
vrncLisrcd crcrry,
h:rrus
r-rrsidc
clorvn
lonr
l
tl'cc
rt
rhc fr- lcfi.
2-2O
.
ASSUREIANIPAL AND
HIS
From
the
palace
at Nineveh
(present-day
QUEEN
IN THE
GARDEN
Ninua, lraq) c 647 e.
Alabaster,
heightapprox,21'(533
cm).
British
Museum, London.
All()l
tlll A\lclt l\l t\t I
/\tl/\l,t
(iir\trt
I
43-
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
18/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
19/22
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
20/22
r- r-
> f,l-'
:
l-l:
r*r
L-.lL'f,t
2-23
.
AERIAL
VIEW OF
THE
CEREMONIAL
COMPLEX'
PERSEPOLIS
lran.
51
8-c. 460
ece.
[il/atch
a video
about
Persepolls
on
myartslab.com
t-{*f
*
-l"ta'
p&
;f ,i;''
-
.,
1*,
t-
f.ir-,n-
:
il-_
i-
t,.,
446
CHAPTER
2 AFT
OF THE
ANCIENT
NEAH
ASI
2-24
.
APADANA
(AUDIENCE
HALL)
OF
DARIUS
AND
XERXES
Ceremonial Complex,
Persepolis,
lran.
518-c.460
BcE.
^t
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
21/22
IY
2-25
.
DARIUS
AND
XERXES RECEIVING TRIBUTE
Detail of
a
relief from the
stairway
leading to the Apadana, Persepolis,
lran.
491-486
ece. Limestone, height
8'4"
(2.54
ml.
Coudesy the
Oriental
lnstitute
of
the
University of Chicago.
fWatctr
a
video about
the
process
of
sculpting in relief on
myartslab.com
listens
fi'om behind
the
thlone
(rro.
2-2s).
Such
pu.rels would
hrve
looked quite diflelent
when
they
wele
fi'eshly
pair-rted in
blighr colols, with
r-netal
objects such as
Darius's crown and neck-
lace covered
in
gold
leaf
(sheets
of
hammeleci gold).
At its height, the Per:sian Empire extenclecl
fror.r.r
Afi'icr
to
India. Frorn
Pelsepolis,
Darius
in
490
c
ancl
Xerxes
in
480
ucl
sent
their
anries
west
to
collqler Greece,
but r-nrir-rland Gleeks
sr"rccessfully
resistecl
the
unries of the Achaemenids,
preventir-g
THINK ABOUT IT
2.1
Describe and characterize
the way
human
figures
are
represented in
the Sumerian votive
figures of
Eshnunna. What
are the
potential
relationships
between
style
and
function?
2.2
Discuss
the
development of
relief
sculpture
in
the
ancient
Near East. Choose
two specific
examples,
one
from
the Sumerian
period
and one from
the Assyrian
period,
and
explain how
symbols
and stories are
combined
to express ideas that were impodant
to
these
two cultures.
2.3 Select two rulers discussed
in this chapter
and explain
how each
preserved
his legacy
through commissioned
works of aft and/or architecture.
2.4
How did
the
excavations of
Sir Leonard Woolley
contribute
to
our
understanding
of the
ad
of the
ancient Near
East?
,r
{
them
'orl
advancing,into
Enrope.
Incleecl,
it was a Greek wl-ro
trltirnately
put
an end
to their
errpire.
In
334
sc,
Alexander
the
Grert of
Maceclonia
(d.323
nce)
crossed into
Anatolia
u.rd swept
through Mesopotamia,
defeating Darius
III
and
near'ly
clestroying
Persepolis
in
330
sc. Although
the
Achaer.nenicl
Empire
was at
an
end,
Persia
eventnally
revived,
and the
Persian
style
in rt
coll-
tinued
to
influence Greek altists
(see
Chapter'
5)
:rnd
r.rltrnately
becune one
of the founclations of Islar.nic art
(see
Chrpter
9).
CROSSCURRENTS
H
rG.
2-10
Both of
these
works depict
a
social
gathering
involving food
and
drink, but they
are
vastly
different
in scale, materials,
and
physical
context. How do the
factors of scale and materials
contribute
io the visual appear-
ance of
the
scenes? How
does
physical
context and audience
affect
the meaning of what
is
portrayed?
Fc 2-2O
,l-
fstuAy
and
review
on
myartslab.com
ART OF THE ANCIENT
NEAR
EAST CHAPTER 2
47
-
8/9/2019 S&C 27-48
22/22