View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
WORLD BANK
Sample Guidelines: Cumulative EnvironmentalImpact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
76998
Sample Guidelines:
Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment
for
Hydropower Projects in Turkey
December 2012
Ankara
DISCLAIMER
ESMAP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTESMAP MISSION
ESMAP COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Boxes
List of Abbreviations
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Objectives and Target Group
1.2. Scope and Relation to EIA Legislation/Process
1.3. Structure of the Guideline
2. CEIA FUNDAMENTALS
2.1. Definition of Cumulative Impacts
2.2. Overview of Basic Concepts
2.2.1. Valued Ecosystem Components (VECs)
2.2.2. Area of Influence
2.2.3. Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC)
2.3. Integrating CEIA into the Project-Level EIA Process
3. KEY TASKS IN CEIA STUDIES
3.1. CEIA Framework
3.2. Scoping
3.2.1. Definition of Project Activities
3.2.2. Identification of Area of Influence
3.2.3. Selection of VECs
3.2.4. Identification of Activities Affecting the Same VECs
3.2.5. Determination of PSS and LAC
3.3. Baseline Studies and Impact Assessment
3.3.1. Baseline Studies
3.3.2. Identification of Impacts
3.3.3. Impact Assessment
3.4. Mitigation Measures
3.5. Evaluation of Significance
3.6. Monitoring and Follow-Up
4. METHODS AND TOOLS FOR CEIA STUDIES
4.1. Overview of Assessment Methods and Tools
4.2. Selection of Assessment Methods and Tools
4.3. Use of Methods and Tools for Different CEIA Tasks
5. PREPARATION AND REPORTING OF CEIA STUDIES
5.1. Reporting of CEIA Findings
5.2. Key Criteria for Best Practice
5.3. CEIA Checklist
REFERENCES
i
ii
ii
ii
iii
1
3
3
4
7
8
11
11
14
18
20
23
24
26
28
28
31
31
35
38
38
39
40
45
47
50
53
54
57
58
61
63
66
67
69
Tabl
e of C
onte
nts
ii Sample Guidelines: Cumulative Enviromental Impact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
List of TablesTable 4 - 1 Overview of Assessment Methods and Tools for CEIA Studies
Table 4 - 2 Applicability of Assessment Methods and Tools for Different CEIA Tasks
List of FiguresFigure 4 - 1 Focusing on Impacts on VECs
List of BoxesBox 1 Sample VECs for a Hydropower Project
Box 2 Steps for CEIA and Unique Tasks for Each Step
Box 3 Scoping of Cumulative Impacts
Box 4 Associated Facilities
Box 5 Area of Influence and Project Activities for Hydropower Projects
Box 6 Area of Influence of HEPP Projects on Upper Ceyhan River
Box 7 Setting Spatial Boundaries in CEIA
Box 8 Habitat-based VEC Identification
Box 9 Sample VEC Table for HEPP Projects on Ceyhan River
Box 10 Selection of Other Actions
Box 11 Selected Actions for CEIA of HEPP Projects on Ceyhan River
Box 12 Critical Habitats Criteria
Box 13 Sample Legal Register
Box 14 Sample Project-Specific Standards
Box 15 Ecosystem Evaluation and Water Use Rights Studies
Box 16 Evaluation Matrix Used for HEPP Projects on Ceyhan River
Box 17 Scenarios for HEPP Projects on Ceyhan River
Box 18 Impact Assessment Tools for CEIA
Box 19 Impact Identification and Assessment Table/Matrix
Box 20 No Net Loss as a Mitigation Measure
Box 21 Analysis of Residual Impact (Impact Remaining after Mitigation)
Box 22 Sample Monitoring Program in the Scope of CEIA for a HEPP Project
55
59
57
13
24
27
28
28
29
30
31
32
33
35
35
36
37
39
41
42
43
44
45
46
51
iiiSample Guidelines: Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
List of AbbreviationsCEIA Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment
EBRD European Bank of Reconstruction and Development
EC European Commission
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EU European Union
GIS Geographic Information Systems
HEPP Hydroelectric Power Plant
IAIA International Association for Impact Assessment
IFC International Finance Corporation
IFI International Finance Institution
LAC Limits of Acceptable Change
MoEU Ministry of Environment and Urbanization
MoFWA Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs
PSS Project Specific Standards
SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment
VEC Valued Ecosystem Component
WPCR Water Pollution Control Regulation
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis study was undertaken jointly by the World Bank and the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General
Directorate of Environmental Impact Assessment, Permitting and Auditing. The World Bank team included
Esra Arkan (ECSEN, Task Manager), Gerhard Dieterle (AES), Aziz Bouzaher (ECSEN), brahim Haluk eriba
(consultant, editor), Dndar Emre Kaya (consultant, editor), Shinya Nishimura (ECSEG), lker Karamullaolu
(ECCU6) and Bilgen Kahraman (ECCU6). We want to thank to General Directorate of Environmental Impact
Assessment, Permitting and Auditing staff for their great leadership and contributions. The study also benefited
from significant contributions from the General Directorates of Water Management, Nature Conservation and
National Parks, and State Hydraulic Works of the Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs.
Overall guidance was provided by Kulsum Ahmed (ECSEN, Sector Manager), Ranjit Lamech (ECSEG, Sector
Manager), and Martin Raiser (Country Director, ECCU6). The team benefited from the valuable comments from
Agi Kiss (ECSOQ), Rikard Liden (TWIWA), and Wolfhart Pohl (AFTSG).
Special thanks to ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Program) for providing the funds for the
realization of this study and for their continuous support.
Introduction1
2 Sample Guidelines: Cumulative Enviromental Impact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
Introduction
Guidelines to Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment (CEIA) has been prepared within the scope of a CEIA technical assistance study (CEIA study) supported by the World Bank. The CEIA study was developed based on the need to
assess the cumulative impacts of hydropower projects in Turkey and was conducted
in coordination and cooperation with the relevant departments of the Ministry of
Environment and Urbanization (MoEU) and the Ministry of Forestry and Water
Affairs (MoFWA).
The Government of Turkey promoted investments in hydroelectric power plant
(HEPP) projects as a policy priority in response to concerns about the environmental
and climate change impact of other power generation technologies, as well as
with an eye to compliance with EU regulations and targets. The rapid growth in
investments raises concerns about the associated impacts (such as minimum
environmental flow, temporary/permanent roads opened for the investment, etc.)
and the significance of the cumulative impact of multiple HEPP projects on the river
basins.
3Sample Guidelines: Cumulative Environmental Impact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
Introduction
1.1 OBJECTIVES AND TARGET GROUPThe general objectives of the guidelines are to improve or strengthen the EIA process and
implementation, provide support for studies related to Strategic Environmental Assessment
(SEA) Regulation and future SEA processes, and promote the sustainable development of
natural resources as well as enhance basin management planning. The specific objectives
of the guidelines are the following:
Provide an overview of the current understanding of the practice of CEIA;
Establish the foundation for CEIA studies to be conducted;
Enhance the quality and content of project-level EIAs by incorporating cumulative
impact assessment considerations;
Provide guidance on CEIA scope and methodology;
Improve the scoping and reviewing processes; and
Inform all relevant stakeholders.
The target group consists of all relevant stakeholders, and in particular experts from the
MoEU, consultants who carry out EIAs, members of the review committees, and project
owners.
1.2 SCOPE AND RELATION TO EIA LEGISLATION/PROCESSThe target group consists of all relevant stakeholders, and in particular experts from the
MoEU, consultants who carry out EIAs, members of the review committees, and project
owners.
4 Sample Guidelines: Cumulative Enviromental Impact Assessment for Hydropower Projects in Turkey
Introduction
This guidance document aims to assist with the execution of CEIAs within the scope of
the EIA process. It is not a legal document and should not be used to supplement EIA (and
future SEA) legislation. The guidelines is not intended to be formal or prescriptive, but is
designed to help EIA practitioners or consultants develop a pro