Click here to load reader

Rutar, Vidic, Bizjak - DETECTING THE IMPACT OF 2010... · PDF file 2010. 11. 12. · Danica Bizjak, @gov.si Environment and Energy Statistics Statistical Office of the Republic of

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Rutar, Vidic, Bizjak - DETECTING THE IMPACT OF 2010... · PDF file 2010. 11....

  • DETECTING THE IMPACT OF DETECTING THE IMPACT OF

    ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

    PROTECTION INVESTMENTPROTECTION INVESTMENT

    Teja Rutar, [email protected]

    Tanja Vidic, [email protected]

    Danica Bizjak, [email protected]

    Environment and Energy Statistics

    Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia

  • Different environmental components in comparison to environmental

    expenditure and GDP, Slovenia, 2002–2009; 2002=100

    INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION

    Sources: SORS, ARSO

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    index

    GDP environmental protection expenditure

    generated municipal and industrial waste recovered waste

    generated waste water treated waste water

    greenhouse gas emissions

  • ENVENVIIRONMENTAL RONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION EXPENDITUREEXPENDITURE

    Gross investment for environmental protection:

    end of pipe investments

    integrated investments

    Current expenditure for environmental protection:

    internal current expenditure

    external current expenditure

    OKI OKI-S

    by environmental domains

  • GROSS GROSS INVESTMENTS INVESTMENTS FOR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL

    PROTECTIONPROTECTION AND CURRENT EXPENDITURE AND CURRENT EXPENDITURE FORFOR

    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SLOVENIA, 2001ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SLOVENIA, 2001--20082008

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    IN V

    2 0

    0 1

    /C E

    2 0

    0 2

    IN V

    2 0

    0 2

    /C E

    2 0

    0 3

    IN V

    2 0

    0 3

    /C E

    2 0

    0 4

    IN V

    2 0

    0 4

    /C E

    2 0

    0 5

    IN V

    2 0

    0 5

    /C E

    2 0

    0 6

    IN V

    2 0

    0 6

    /C E

    2 0

    0 7

    IN V

    2 0

    0 7

    /C E

    2 0

    0 8

    by annual delay

    m io

    E U

    R

    gross investments

    current expenditure

    Source: SORS

  • The share of gross

    investment for

    environmental protection

    in gross fixed capital

    formation, Slovenia,

    2001-2008

    Environmental protection

    expenditure for public

    sector in million EUR

    and % of GDP, Slovenia,

    2001-2008

    Source: SORS

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    E n

    v ir

    o n

    m e

    n ta

    l p

    ro te

    c ti

    o n

    e x

    p e

    n d

    it u

    re

    (m io

    E U

    R )

    0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    1,2

    E n

    v ir

    o n

    m e

    n ta

    l p

    ro te

    c ti

    o n

    e x

    p e

    n d

    it u

    re

    (% G

    D P

    )

    mio EUR % GDP

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    % o

    f G

    ro s

    s F

    ix e

    d C

    a p

    it a

    l F

    o rm

    a ti

    o n

    ( IN

    V -1

    )

  • INVESTMENT INVESTMENT IN IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

    COMPARED TO THE WASTE STATISTICSCOMPARED TO THE WASTE STATISTICS

    greater investment

    in waste

    management

    a larger quantities

    of waste

    recovered

    annual delay

    The quantity of recovered waste in comparison with gross

    investments for waste management, annual delay, Slovenia,

    2001-2009

    Source: SORS

    0

    500

    1.000

    1.500

    2.000

    2.500

    3.000

    3.500

    4.000

    4.500

    5.000

    5.500

    IN V

    2 0 0 1 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 2

    IN V

    2 0 0 2 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 3

    IN V

    2 0 0 3 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 4

    IN V

    2 0 0 4 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 5

    IN V

    2 0 0 5 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 6

    IN V

    2 0 0 6 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 7

    IN V

    2 0 0 7 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 8

    IN V

    2 0 0 8 /w

    a s te

    2 0 0 9

    R e c o v e re

    d q

    u a n ti ti e s o

    f w

    a s te

    (1 0 0 0 t

    )

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    G ro

    s s i n v e s tm

    e n ts

    f o r

    w a s te

    m a n a g e m

    e n t

    (m io

    E U

    R )

    recovered quantities of waste gross investments for waste management

  • INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

    COMPARED TO THE WASTE STATISTICSCOMPARED TO THE WASTE STATISTICS

    increasing quantities

    of waste generated,

    recovered

    increase in current

    expenditure for

    waste management

    Current expenditure - for the operation and maintenance

    of devices for waste treatment, compared to the quantity

    of recovered waste, in industry, Slovenia, 2002 - 2008

    Source: SORS

    0

    500

    1.000

    1.500

    2.000

    2.500

    3.000

    3.500

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    R e c o v e re

    d q

    u a n ti ti e s o

    f w

    a s te

    (1 0 0 0 t

    )

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    C u rr

    e n t

    e x p e n d it u re

    f o r

    o p e ra

    ti n g a

    n d

    m a in

    ta in

    in g f

    a c ili

    ti e s f

    o r

    w a s te

    tr e a tm

    e n t

    (m io

    E U

    R )

    recovered wastes funds for operation and maintenance

  • INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

    AND WASTEWATERAND WASTEWATER TREATEMENTTREATEMENT

    End of pipe investments for wastewater management in comparison

    with quantity of treated wastewater, annual delay, Slovenia, 2002-2009

    Source: SORS

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    IN V

    2 0 0 2 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 3

    IN V

    2 0 0 3 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 4

    IN V

    2 0 0 4 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 5

    IN V

    2 0 0 5 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 6

    IN V

    2 0 0 6 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 7

    IN V

    2 0 0 7 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 8

    IN V

    2 0 0 8 /w

    a s te

    w a te

    r2 0 0 9

    T re

    a te

    d w

    a s te

    w a te

    r (1

    0 0 0 m

    3 )

    0

    10.000

    20.000

    30.000

    40.000

    50.000

    60.000

    70.000

    80.000

    90.000

    "E n d o

    f p ip

    e "

    in v e s tm

    e n ts

    f o r

    w a s te

    w a te

    r m

    a n a g e m

    e n t

    (1 0 0 0 E

    U R

    )

    treated waste water

    "end of pipe" investments for wastewater management

  • INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

    AND WASTEWATERAND WASTEWATER GENERATIONGENERATION

    The quantity of wastewater, compared with gross investment and current

    expenditure for wastewater management in industry, Slovenia, 2003-2008

    Source: SORS

    0

    5.000

    10.000

    15.000

    20.000

    25.000

    30.000

    2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Q u

    a n

    ti ty

    o f

    w a s te

    w a te

    r (1

    0 0 0 m

    3 )

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    G ro

    s s i

    n v e s tm

    e n

    t a n

    d c

    u rr

    e n

    t

    e x p

    e n

    d it

    u re

    f o

    r w

    a s te

    w a te

    r

    m a n

    a g

    e m

    e n

    t (m

    io E

    U R

    )

    quantity of wastewater expenditure for wastewater

  • INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL

    PROTECTION AND PROTECTION AND GHG EMISSIONSGHG EMISSIONS

    Current expenditure in comparison to greenhouse gas emissions, Slovenia, 2001–2008

    Sources: SORS, ARSO

    18.500

    19.000

    19.500

    20.000

    20.500

    21.000

    21.500

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    G H

    G e

    m is

    s io

    n s (

    C O

    2 e

    q u

    iv a le

    n t