RIAA Case Analysis

  • Upload
    kaigin

  • View
    232

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    1/22

    Executive Summary

    This case analysis revolves around the ethics of downloading music from the internet.

    The case began with Andy Decker who was problematic about what gift to give his sister. After a

    short and quick brainstorming, he ended up planning to buy a compilation of songs his sister

    likes. His dilemma began when he had to choose between purchasing an original CD from a

    music store or to simply get free copies from the internet. He came across a message on the

    internet while he was in pursuit for the perfect gift forhis sister. The message said, Distributing

    or downloading copyrighted music on the Internet without permission from the copyright owner

    is ILLEGAL.

    This study focuses on the RIAA or also known as the Recording Industry Association of

    America. RIAA is a trade association which represented common interests with different U.S

    recording companies. This study also discusses when the problem of the RIAA started and the

    different internal and external factors that affected its operations. It elaborates the significant

    incidents that followed the growth of the problem and how the company dealt with the seemingly

    insurmountable challenges that came before them. In addition, this analysis also contains

    scanning of the companys environment which includes the internal and external environment

    that could affect the business operation of the company.

    Moreover, this study also explains the people responsible for solving the problems, the

    companys objectives and possible alternative courses of actions. This analysis also covers the

    groups recommendations to solve the challenges faced by the company.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    2/22

    Case Background

    RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) is a trade organization that embodies

    the interests of the different U.S. recording companies. Its members include EMI Group

    Bertelsmanns BMG unit, Sony Music Entertainment, AOL Time Warners Warner Music

    Group, and Vivendis Universal Music Group. The sudden technological advancement led to the

    growth of interest in the free reproduction and distribution of music. The invention of CD

    manufacturing made a better and improved sound in recordings, made an easy to use and

    durable format. Moreover, computers became the source of multimedia creations including CD

    burning software and stereo sound systems.

    The emergence of the internet as part of the technological advancement gave birth to

    modern applications which included P2P FileSharing software. 2002, CD sales plummeted

    by 11% according to Nielsen Soundscan and on the same time, the consumer electronics

    association believed that the sales of blank CDs would rise by more than 40%. 2003, the

    downloading of music from the internet became a prominent leisure activity. This was

    commonly done by students in their dorm rooms and even made copies and shared downloaded

    files with one another. A survey by the Pew Internet and American Life Project showed that 60%

    of college students uses had downloaded music files compared to 28% of the overall populations

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    3/22

    Case Proper

    I. Time ContextOn May 1999, a P2P file-sharing service named Napster allowed users to

    exchange music for free and on December of the same year, Napster was accused

    of copyright infringement and encouraging of illegal copying and distribution of

    music. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filed a lawsuit

    against the said P2P file-sharing service.

    Since the growth of P2P file-sharing services, recording companies

    suffered a massive decline in worldwide CD sales. At the end of 2001, CD sales

    dropped by 5% and at the end of 2002, there was an 11% decline in sales of CDs.

    In 2003, a number of P2P file-sharing services announced upgrades to

    their software that would make it more difficult to uncover the identities of its

    users.

    II. ViewpointAccording to the RIAA, there were an increasing and significant number of

    students using the networks of the university to participate in online piracy of

    copyrighted materials. Because of that, the College administrators, including the

    General Counsel/Chief Legal Officer, Director of Information Technology, and

    the Chief Financial Officer were asked substantial support by the RIAA to help

    bring the piracy under control.

    The RIAA, being the embodiment of different recording companies is also

    responsible in the continuous effort of putting a profound value in the meaning of

    ethical music downloading.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    4/22

    III. Statement Of The Objectives Must Objective

    -To bring piracy under control

    -To educate online downloaders about how they could violate the Federal

    copyright law by simply uploading and downloading copyrighted works

    -To increase the sales of recording companies

    Want Objective- To specify what practices are and are not acceptable on the schools

    network

    - To impose effective remedies against violators

    -To improve security in university networks by monitoring student

    compliance

    IV. Statement of The Problem (CAUSE & EFFECT)o Cause

    Music Piracyo Effect

    According to RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America), Users whoupload and download infringing copyrighted works without permission of the

    owners are violating Federal copyrighted law.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    5/22

    Common Examples of Online Copyright Infringement:

    You make an MP3 copy of a song because the CD you bought expressly permitsyou to do so. But then you put your MP3 copy on the Internet, using a file-sharing

    network, so that millions of other people can download it.

    Even if you dont illegally offer recordings to others, you join a file-sharingnetwork and download unauthorized copies of all the copyrighted music you want

    for free from the computers of other network members.

    In order to gain access to copyrighted music on the computers of other network

    members, you pay a fee to join a file-sharing network that isnt authorized to

    distribute or make copies of copyrighted music. Then you download unauthorized

    copies of all the music you want.

    You transfer copyrighted music using an instant messaging service. You have a computer with a CD burner, which you use to burn copies of music

    you have downloaded onto writable CDs for all of your friends.

    Somebody you dont even know e-mails you a copy of a copyrighted song andthen you turn around and e-mail copies to all of your friends.

    o Cause Consumers do not buy original CDs and they download music from the internet

    instead.

    o Effect Recording companies experienced declining of sales.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    6/22

    o Cause Security and Privacy Risk from P2P (Peer to Peer) file sharing

    o Effect There are instances that files to be shared were susceptible to worms and viruses. Many users are not aware that their personal documents may be available for many

    of computer users to download

    Music piracy was not viewed as an ethical issue and because of this perception; a lot of

    people continue to patronize downloading of music for free without the authorization of the

    artists or composers who wrote the song. According to the national survey conducted by Edison

    Media Research, 74% of teenagers (12-17 years old) did not see anything wrong with

    downloading music for free.

    The RIAA is exerting too much effort on combating piracy instead of finding ways to

    change their business models and profit from digital music. Moreover, efforts being provided by

    different recording companies were not enough in order to catch the pace of digital music.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    7/22

    V. Environmental ScanningA. I nternal Environment

    Area Strengths Weaknesses

    Marketing Product

    Legal products(music)there are still existing P2P file sharing

    services nowadays that the RIAA

    pursues to abolish because of their illegal

    distribution, copying or recording of

    files. However, there are a number of

    legitimate subscription services such as

    ITunes and Emusic that sell music

    legally.

    Flexible payment options because of the advancement of

    technology, online stores was able to

    develop ways in providing different

    payment options for their customers in

    order to pave way for easy and

    convenient transactions.

    Price

    Expensive cost of CDs andonline copies

    -The costs of newly

    released albums are very

    expensive whether

    customers buy from music

    stores or online.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    8/22

    Place:

    Options to buy online or from stores P2P-file sharing networks are only

    available online but businesses offering

    legal music can be found in physical

    stores and online stores.

    Promotions

    Strong product advertisements- Music that customers are looking for

    are marketed or advertised in many

    different ways such as television, radio,

    newsprints, magazines, posters and

    online advertisements.

    -In the fight for the abolishment of

    illegal copying, recording, or distributing

    of copyrighted music or files, recording

    companies have the support of artists or

    celebrities who also support the same

    advocacy. In fact, prominent

    songwriters, singers, and musicians got

    together and formed a group called

    Music United for Strong Internet

    Copyright or MUSIC. This is to ask their

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    9/22

    B. External Environment (Industry Environment)

    fans not to download copyrighted music.

    Area Opportunities Threats

    Degree of

    Competition

    Legality of transactions as their advantage

    - The legality of their transactions can beused as their advantage to keep people

    from illegally downloading files.

    According to a research made by a

    Princeton University student for her

    thesis in Economics, she found out that

    46 percent of students who took the

    survey said that they would be willing to

    pay for a legal online music service

    while only 27 percent said they would

    not.

    Advocacy to stop music piracy

    - Other than partnering with prominentsongwriters, singers, and musicians, the

    RIAA has also sent letters to University

    Presidents to build a bridge between the

    understanding of ethical principles of

    Limited support from the

    public to fight music piracy

    - A national surveyconducted by Edison

    Media Research found

    that 74 percent of

    teenagers (12 17 years

    old) did not see anything

    wrong with downloading

    music for free.

    High-costs of legal and clean

    file copies

    - People view recordingcompanies as greedy

    charging $20 per CD

    when the costs of

    duplication were minimal.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    10/22

    downloading of music and the students.

    Clean files

    - Almost all of the legal online musicservices dont have viruses, adware or

    spyware hidden behind the files they

    provide for their customers as compared

    to P2P-file sharing networks that have

    less socially redeeming features.

    - According to an Ipsos-Reid survey, 19percent of Americans 12 years and older

    said that they had downloaded an audio

    file from a file-sharing network; more

    than half of people between 12 and 17

    years old said they had done so. Because

    of this, its possible that young people

    were being exposed to age-inappropriate

    materials.

    P2P-File sharing networks

    excuse

    - Kazaa, Morpheus, andGrokster did not distribute

    music; they merely

    provided the software that

    enabled the exchange of

    files among members. A

    federal court judge ruled

    that the users, and not the

    networks offering the

    software, were

    responsible for copyright

    infringement.

    - As a result of a federaljudges decision,

    networks were able to

    stay in business and were

    able to attract additional

    investors and advertisers

    now that the viability of

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    11/22

    c. General EnvironmentArea Opportunities Threats

    POLITICO-

    LEGAL

    - As stated by the courts of law, anyonewho digitally transfers files of

    copyright-protected songs and keep

    them on the hard drives of their

    computers or laptops were breaking the

    law.

    - When the RIAA found out about theentire business operation of Napster, it

    filed a lawsuit against Napster on

    December 1999. Napster was accused of

    illegal distribution and copying of

    - A federal court judgeruled that the P2P File-sharing

    services were not responsible for

    copyright infringement, its the

    users. Since then, these kinds of

    services continued to flourish and

    in fact, were able to persuade

    more investors and advertisers to

    invest on their services.

    their businesses models

    was more certain.

    Continuous

    growth of P2P-

    File sharing

    networks

    The continuous growth of P2P-

    File sharing networks provide

    alternatives for people who are

    looking for an easy and free

    access to music or any other

    kind of files.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    12/22

    music.

    - According to the Ninth U.S CircuitCourt of Appeals, Napster was fully

    well-aware of their users illegally traded

    music.

    - A group of P2P File-sharing servicesreceive their own lawsuits coming from

    a group of recording and movie picture

    companies for financially benefiting

    from the infringing of copyright works.

    - A restraining order was issued toMadster, was also known as Aimster.

    Another P2P File-sharing service

    established by Johnny Deep. Due to the

    restraining order, its operations were

    forcefully shutdown on December 2002.

    - A federal appeals court in Chicagoupheld an injunction that forced Aimster

    to shut down.(July 2003)

    -To further combat music piracy, the

    RIAA settled more than 900 subpoenas

    with university administrators and

    Internet service providers asking for the

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    13/22

    names and addresses of people sharing

    music files. The RIAA stated that they

    would file lawsuits against these

    individuals by the end of August.

    - School administrators value theirstudents right to privacy but they also

    felt obliges to follow the Digital

    Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA)

    ECONOMIC - Recording Companies

    experienced an 11% decline in

    worldwide sales of CDs,

    Approximately 1.7 billion

    blanks CDs were sold in 2002,

    up to 40% from 2001.(end of

    2002)

    SOCIO

    CULTURAL

    - Despite the culture of people whenit comes to their perception of music

    piracy, there are students who are

    willing enough to pay for legal music.

    Based on the study conducted by a

    Princeton University student, 46% of

    - Most people did not seemusic piracy as an ethical issue.

    According to a national survey

    held by Edison Media Research,

    74% of teenagers from 12 to 17

    years believed that theres

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    14/22

    the students who participated in the

    survey said that theyre will to buy a

    legal copy of online music and only

    27% said that they would not.

    - There were less socially redeemingfeatures being catered by P2P File-

    sharing services. An Ipsos-Reid survey

    clearly showed the negative impact of

    files being exchanged online and the

    advertising strategies used by the P2P

    File-sharing services on their primary

    users, teenagers. According to the

    survey by Ipsos-Reid, 19% of

    Americans 12 years and older confessed

    that they had downloaded an audio file

    from a P2P File-sharing network and

    more than half of people between 12

    and 17 years old also said that they had

    done so. Based on this study, there was

    a good possibility that the youth was

    being exposed to inappropriate

    materials. Downloading files from a

    file-sharing network could expose

    nothing wrong with

    downloading music for free.

    Most students couldnt accept

    the analogy that downloading

    music can be viewed similar to

    stealing a CD from a store.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    15/22

    TECHNOLOGICAL

    teenagers to pornographic images and

    advertisements luring them to visit an

    online gambling site.

    - Administrators of the differentcolleges and universities found the

    habitual downloading of movies,

    games, and songs would overload

    the computer network of the campus

    making it difficult for the professors

    to make use of the internet for

    teaching and researching purposes.

    - Screening software thathinders pornography

    materials from regular

    websites did not work

    on file-sharing

    programs.

    - The flourishing of theinternet opened a door

    of opportunities for new

    applications to be made

    that includes P2P File-

    sharing services.

    - Technological advancesmade the downloading

    of music from the

    internet a prominent

    leisure-time activity in

    2003.

    - Because of the

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    16/22

    subsequent

    technological

    advancements, a

    tremendous amount of

    interest in the free

    reproduction and

    distribution of music

    grew.

    Some university students would

    set up search engines on their

    campus computer networks in

    order to keep files such as

    photographs, term papers and

    MP3 music files. Since these

    files are located in the campuss

    network, all of the students who

    study within the vicinity of the

    school can have access to any

    files available on the network.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    17/22

    VI. SWOT AnalysisSWOT MATRIX STRENGTHS

    1. Legal products2. Flexible payment option3. Options to buy online or

    from stores

    4. Strong productadvertisements

    WEAKNESSES

    1. Expensive cost of CDsand online copies

    2. Public perceptions of theRIAA

    OPPORTUNITIES

    1. Preference of the majority2. Advocacy to stop music

    piracy

    3. Clean files

    S1, O1, O2: Educate the

    people about the illegal

    transactions of P2P file

    sharing services.

    W1, O1, O3: Offer lower

    costs of CDs and clean online

    copies.

    THREATS

    1. Limited support from thepublic to fight music

    piracy

    2. P2P-file sharing networksexcuse

    3. The continuous growth ofP2P-File sharing

    networks provide

    alternatives for people

    T1, T3, S4: Strengthen

    advocacy about music piracy.

    Educate consumers about the

    possible viruses and malicious

    materials that could be

    harmful to people between 12

    and 17 years old.

    T1, W2: Fix their accounting

    errors which will help them

    gain public support in order

    to regulate music piracy.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    18/22

    who are looking for an

    easy and free access to

    music or any other kind

    of files

    VII. Alternative Course of Action - Solution of the ProblemThose who participate in the sharing and distribution of music without the permission of

    the original artist or composer are violating the Federal copyright law.

    Education about Music Piracy

    ACA 1: To strongly educate the people, especially the students of different colleges and

    universities regarding Music piracy and how they are violating the Federal copyright law by

    simply uploading and downloading infringing copyrighted works without permission.

    ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

    - This course of action will teach thepeople about the fundamental part of

    educating them about ethics, personal

    responsibility, and respect for the rule

    of law.

    - Moreover, this will also make themunderstand that if they pirate

    copyrighted works, they are subject to

    - It takes a lot of time and effort foreducation about music piracy to

    completely spread.

    - Theres no assurance that people willabide to the advocacy the company is

    trying to send across.

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    19/22

    legal liability.

    - Education about music piracy couldlead to a possible decline in the

    percentage of people illegally sharing

    and distributing music.

    ACA 2: To change their business models that will help them earn profit from digital music.

    ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES

    - This course of action will allow them tocompete against other P2P file-sharing

    services by providing a myriad of legal

    digital music.

    - This will give options to the consumersthat will result to them convenience.

    - Changing business models and keepingpace with the advancement of

    technology will require them a huge

    amount of investment

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    20/22

    Recommendation

    They should modify their promotion and change it that will help them gain morecustomers. For example, they could offer a bundled music with a lower price.

    Offer lower prices that will not compromise their profit. Ensure the accuracy and correctness of their accounting papers in order to gain the trust

    of recording artist and the public.

    Detailed Plan of Action

    Activity People Involved Time

    Scheme

    Desired Results Priority

    -Education of

    people especially

    students

    - School administrators

    (General Counsel,

    Director of Information

    Technology, Dean of

    Student Affairs)

    -Hilary Rosen (Chairman

    and CEO of Recording

    Industry Association of

    America), Edward P.

    Murphy (President and

    CEO of National Music

    Publishers Association),

    Q1Q2 -To see students

    encouraged to stop

    downloading music

    without permission

    from the original

    author or composer.

    -To see colleges

    and universities

    apply stricter rules

    when it comes to

    the students access

    to the internet and

    High

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    21/22

    - Modification of

    business model

    and Rick Carnes

    (President of the

    Songwriters Guild of

    America)

    CEO and the board Entire

    year

    impose appropriate

    warnings and

    penalties to those

    who violate the

    rule.

    -To see more

    people informed

    about what music

    piracy is and what

    penalties can be

    given upon them

    when its violated.

    -Letters sent to

    different colleges

    and universities.

    -Additional option

    for customers to

    buy music.

    High

  • 7/27/2019 RIAA Case Analysis

    22/22

    -Additional

    department that

    will handle digital

    music